mark: it has been two days since americans woke up to the news deadliest mass shooting on american soil. he put the world has been transfixed by how the two presumptive nominees are responding to this moment of national crisis. to talk about what candidates and -- we will talk about what candidates and party leaders have been saying. bloombergnew national politics poll hot off the presses that show hillary clinton leading donald trump by double digits in a head-to-head general election matchup, 49% to 37%.

frompoll was conducted friday to monday, so the shooting in orlando occurred while in the field, making it the first telephone survey conducted since the attack. yesterday, we added a few questions, including asking which presidential candidates they think would be better as commander-in-chief handling an event similar to the one in orlando. saidaid trump and 41% hillary clinton. 15% said they were not sure. we will have more on this poll later in the program, but just from a we have discussed so far, what do you think and what do you find most striking about these numbers? the survey shows what a lot of democrats and republicans have been saying privately. in the run-up to orlando and in the run-up to orlando, hillary clinton is showing herself at her best and donald trump is struggling with all but his core

supporters. is her ceilingt and his floor and republicans certainly hope that's not the is a spread that's about as wide as you can imagine . our poll is going to confirm what a lot of private data has said. trump mayfraid that be pretty far behind in this race as a snapshot of where we are right now. clear, i's be described the timing but this poll takes into full account donald trump's problems, the problems he made for himself by making those racist comments about the judge and then doing day after day of negative news coverage for doing so, criticism from the left, the right, the center, and it does also include this one night of polling since orlando. the: it also includes

coming together of the democratic party with president obama coming in behind hillary clinton. with elizabeth warren. clinton has had a story working toward unity. wouldthat is true and i add further to that that the one thing it doesn't is clued is -- it doesn't include is bernie sanders is not endorsed to hillary clinton, so there's still some part of the democratic party not on board the hillary clinton bandwagon. she could still benefit in terms of her polling strength when the that eventuality occurs. when it does, she's going to get more good news and more of a lift in the polling. i agree 100%. the horse race is ugly but it is striking and although it is within the margin of area, -- margin of error, more voters say donald trump would be a good commander-in-chief in a situation such as this.

trump still has a few percentage point lead, within the margin of error to but he leads are on that and leads are in the attributes that voters see him at that are at handling terrorism. that is in line with what we have seen in past polling but it is worth noting here. mark: since the shooting, donald trump has been talking and tweeting quite a bed and one thing he has been stressing is the fact that president obama and hillary clinton are wrong for not using the words "radical islamic terrorism" to describe the motives and basis of these kinds of attacks. yesterday, during his national security speech, he said he suspected clinton might give in and start using the phrase. at a campaign event in pittsburgh today, clinton showed no sign she's going to back down on that. ms. clinton: i have clearly said we face terrorist enemies who use a perverted version of islam to justify slaughtering innocent people. we have to stop them and we

will. donald suggests i will not call this thread what it is. he has not been listening. but i will not demonize and declare war on an entire religion. trump's words will be, in fact they already are, a recruiting tool for isis to help them increase its ranks of people willing to do what we saw in orlando. he is turning americans against americans, which is exactly what isis wants. fought who have actually terrorists know this. he says he knows more about isis than the generals do. [laughter] hard to even think of what to say about that claim. he said i will abolish the second amendment. well, that's wrong. he said i will let a flood of refugees into the country

without any screening. that's also wrong. lies, butdemonstrably he feels compelled to tell them because he has to distract us from the fact he has nothing substantive to say for himself. [applause] right around the time clinton was speaking in pittsburgh, the president was meeting with his national security team and defended his own word choices with fiery remarks at the treasury department. has nott obama: there been a moment in my seven and a half years as president were we have not been able to pursue a usetegy because we didn't islam."l "radical once has an advisor of mine said if we really use that

phrase, we are going to turn this thing around. not once. seriously thinks that we don't know who we are fighting, they know full well who the enemy is. so do the intelligence and law enforcement officers who spend countless hours disrupting plots and protecting all americans, including politicians who tweet. and appear on cable news shows. they know who the nature of the enemy is. magic to theo phrase "radical islam." talking point,l it is not a strategy. and the reason i am careful about how i describe this threat has nothing to do with political correct this and everything to

do with actually defeating extremism. qaeda like isil and al war a warke this between islam and america. intense,t was president obama at the white house. we asked likely voters if avoiding the term "radical islam " makes the u.s. look weak in the fight against terrorism. for the 7% say they agree with disagree.ment and 44% within the margin of error. who is getting the better of this argument? this first, let's just say picture we have seen right here today, two on 1, 2 political heavyweights, hillary clinton barack obama both taking on trump is a striking thing to watch and something we will see a lot over the course of the general election. that whole number is interesting

, the fact that there is some sense that trump is onto something, at least in a narrow way that the public is on his side and believe the administration does not like to islam" phrase "radical is a weak point. trump is insts that the wrong place to suggest obama is on the wrong side of terror. they are also strongly against the notion of increasing surveillance on muslims living in america. focused onhy he is the language issue because it's one of the few areas substantively where he seems to have a bit of a strong hand. mark: that is a point of view there -- the family breaking down along partisan lines will it's a testament to the

competent to hillary clinton and president obama have overall on foreign policy, that they are both going after him and not hiding from it. this is an issue trump has talked about for months and i have not in age to monitor. it shows you they believe they are at a moment in time when confronting trump, even where trump thinks he's on offenses or maybe on offenses to some extent, they are feeling confident enough to do it. that and they also think this is not just a policy discussion but a character discussion and trying to make it clear that the way he talks makes him unfit to be president of the united states and as a key part of hillary clinton's argument going forward. democrats are not the only ones having a problem with trump's reaction. republican leaders yesterday seemed to be distancing themselves on both policy and political ground on their party's presumptive nominee.

praisedbob corker who trump's last major foreign-policy address and has been talked about as a potential running mate told reporters today that his remarks, trump's remarks were not what corker expected and that he was "discouraged" by the campaign trump was running. here is what house speaker paul ryan said about trump's proposed temporary ban on muslims entering the united states. think a: i do not muslim ban is within our country's instrument -- interest or reflective of our principles. adding the smarter way to go in all risk sex is a security test and not a religious test all test.- religious john: trump has projected strength in the face of a crisis that we see many party leaders rejecting trump's position out of hand and concerns are growing

, i know you are hearing it among republicans that trump might be losing not just news cycles but the entire general election before it even begins to stop what do you think are the sources of concern among republicans about trump's standing with the electorate? they don't see a turnaround in his level of organization and that convention planning is going to slow all stop they see private data that suggests his performance in last 10 days have heard him and of course, he continues to create controversy and not talk about issues like the economy and changing washington as he did last tuesday in a way that was making them feel better about the campaign. it can change or turn around again but the biggest thing is a lot of the media and a lot of republicans, mostly ones who don't want trump to win, but including some who do, think this thing is being cooked in a way that would be difficult. john: you and i have talked to a

lot of people who have done presidential campaigns. we have talked about how campaigns are won or lost not in the fall but in the spring or summer. not only were these bad for trump but could not come at a worse time and to see the reaction of republican leaders to the speech yesterday, his tweets on sunday and his attack on president obama during the morning shows, it is all created a sense that this is a moment trump has normally benefited from it people are turning tail. i feel like they would not be running from him quite the way they are if they didn't sense this might be a sinking ship all the reasons -- for all the reasons you describe. difficult tond it accept the fact that trump is going to stop making errors. can he turn around and how is he going to do it? john: i am increasingly of the

view that a guy who is donald trump, who is 69 years old and has been the character he has been for as long as he has been and has had so many reinforcements for his behavior peoplekely to change and in the republican party who are praying for him suddenly to become more presidential and to pivot, they are barking up the wrong tree or whistling past the graveyard or whatever cliche you want to use all stop i can imagine a million things donald trump could do to turn around but i don't know if he has anything like the inclination to do those things and so far, there's no evidence that he does all stop -- that he does. mark: he needs to pick a running one,that is ready from day he needs a great convention and a great first debate. all of those things are within his grasp, but he better be planning as things now because if he's going to approach them in the same ad hoc way he approaches every thing else, i

don't think he's going to pull off that important trifecta. john: the question is whether even if he does those things you suggested, whether it may be too late if he does enough damage to himself over the next month or so in addition to what he has done. the great and powerful pollster and seltzer shows us what is behind the curtain of her and our latest bloomberg whole after these words from our sponsor. -- latest bloomberg poll after these words from our sponsor. ♪

mark: welcome back. we are just -- joined by and seltzer coming from just that of des moines, iowa. thank you for coming back on. want -- thank you.

mark: i want to talk about hillary clinton. let's talk about the groups that are powering that lead. this is the first time we have measured a third-party candidate in the race, so she does well with each additional groups you would expect her to do well with. high. is not quite as a lot of people are playing the game of how is she doing with this together group and is she going to be able to get the number? the groups she does well with our the groups you expect -- the nonwhite groups, nonmarried groups and non-male groups, that is women. she's doing very well with those groups. she's also winning a majority of the under 35 age group and i think it's going to be the bright spot for her. that's because the bernie sanders people are now coming on board with hillary clinton.

she gets 55% of people who say they supported bernie sanders in the nominating contest. of is still losing a total donald trumps to and gary johnson, so that is something to take a look at. trumpin terms of donald costs for, he's pretty far behind. who's with him and who is against him? ann: his support, if you look at the groups that are most likely to support our the mirror image of the clinton group -- he does well with whites, especially well with white men, with married men, he does well with men and whites in any way you look at it. the additional things he has going for him are evangelicals. that is his strongest support, 54% of evangelicals say they prefer trump over hillary

clinton or gary johnson. as donald trump would say, the evangelicals love him. what do the polls say about their respective weaknesses? ann: one of the things we wanted to check in with his things that have been going on, things they have been charging each other with all stop how bothered our voters with what is being said about the candidates? for hillary clinton, the most about her is the wall street speeches. that is the reason you heard bernie sanders beat up on her and the reason trump is likely to beat up on her. 50% saying they are bothered a lot by that kind of talk. by comparison, for trump you talk earlier about his comments to the mexican judge and his --ments, think 55% bothered

were bothered a lot and you talked about the muslim band -- the muslim ban. 60% are bothered by the way he talks about women will stop so when we say he is losing with women and he's losing by a lot, the language part, the semantics part is part of what is driving people to say that does not sound residential, that does not sound like a candidate i want to support. john: we got a bunch of questions about orlando last night, we did ask some specific things and one of them was on an assault weapons ban. a big part of this medical discourse because hillary clinton has kicked that back into the debate. how do people feel about that proposal? the american public is divided on this issue -- on that

issue. it's just about half and half of saying there should be a ban on assault weapons for sale to civilians and about half say they disagree with that. it's one of those issues that there is a cleavage in the electorate about what to do about that kind of thing. thank you very much for joining us. when we come back, check in on the democratic unity project after this. ♪

>> what happens to the clinton global initiative if your wife is president? we will do the

right thing. some will clearly be changes in what the clinton foundation does and how we do it and we will have to cross that bridge when we come to it. john: that was former president bill clinton talking to david westin at the clinton global initiative conference today in atlanta. over here, we are more focused on what happens after the polls close in the nation capital, when biller -- when bernie sanders is expected to be with hillary clinton to discuss the future of his campaign. sanders huddled with advisers this weekend as he bowls his next move will stop today, sanders did not offer his endorsement of hillary clinton and said the democratic party leadership needs to change. still talking about the possibility of keeping his campaign alive, he has shed some

of his staff and sought being critical of clinton public appearances. where does the prospect of democratic unity stand? think he's going to get out like a normal candidate and be on the trajectory to stop hindering secretary clinton but i think he wants to go into philadelphia with guns somewhat blazing, still trying to change the democratic party. i think you will be out of the race is effectively but wait until philadelphia and see what kind of frame of mind he is about trying to make some kind of changes that will will require him to press on the roll call for as many votes as possible. what isthink it matters going on behind the scenes between their campaigns. there are two possible places where sanders can push for change. one is on the platform and the other is on the process for nominating president and it's obvious from what he has been saying that is much more focused on trying to do open primaries, same-day registration and i

think it is likely hillary clinton will be fine with giving those things to him which will put things on track toward a more unified convention rather than a convention if she were to be resistant on that front. mark: you are seeing so much attention on unity and the symbolism, they even had to cancel their event this week because of orlando, president obama double-teaming donald trump. it doesn't mean bernie sanders is irrelevant, but they are capturing a lot of the energy of the party and that reduces his leverage. john: when we come back, we will talk about the -- we will talk to the libertarian candidate for vice president about a rethink that has been going on in the news. ♪

♪ john: joining us now is the only 2016 candidate so far campaigning to become the vice president of the united states,

former governor of massachusetts william weld who is running on the libertarian party ticket with gary johnson. thank you for being here. we are going to spend a little bit of the segment talking about what is going on. we have heard from hillary clinton heard from donald trump, heard from barack obama about what should be done about preventing more instances like what happened in orlando. weld: these alone walls acting by inspiration, they are tough to combat and i think the way to do it is too treated it as one big, enormous organized crime case. we did this successfully in the 1970's and 1980's and took out the top three echelons of organized crime scrambling bits of information from all over and i successfully used a hotline to take out narcotics in boston. you get the world's biggest

hotline, whistleblower and you hire 1002 fbi agents and transfer season fbi agents with experience in counterterrorism to sift the evidence that comes from all over and that is a you get the predication for a search warrant or a wiretap double help you make a real case. the tragedy in this case was that the kite was investigated twice and when those investigations were close, his name was removed. that should have never happened, not when the stakes of this high. john: before you were governor in the 1990's, you were in the justice department. head of the criminal division of the justice department in washington under reagan. i have all of this shooting massacre, terrorism, cia, fbi. john: in terms of domestic enforcement, do you think that the fbi needs new tools, greater electronic surveillance, on the grout surveillance? resources dedicated

spawnating isis and its in the united states, particularly as one vast criminal conspiracy like the organized crime in the 1980's. that is what rudy giuliani did and that is what i did. you have to have a single brain which can do this thousand person task force. you have to make sure you can put the pieces together and that is i you would've gotten a guy like this. mark: what you have laid out is not some different from what i've heard from a lot of republicans and democrats. for voters trying to understand what your party is about, how does the libertarian party, how does your ticket differ from donald trump, hillary clinton and barack obama? >> that is really a justice department proposal, not a libertarian party proposal based on my experience in the justice department.

we had a lot of long-running grand jury investigations making big cases. that is coming to cut the organized crime people, the posses, athe jamaican task force dedicated to enron because they needed to have a dedicated set of personnel and that is what i am talking about here. i am applying task force by analogy to the organized crime strikeforce of the 1980's. mark: since 9/11, has the federal government passed any laws that have encroached on civil liberties that you object to? >> i think there were a couple things in the patriot act, some changes made there. the fact is -- mark: what specific provisions? >> i think there were a dozen or more in the rewrite back in 2005 and the principle was, you do not want the government compiling information of people

with no predication just because they want to have information like going to the library and who is taking out books on world war ii? that is no good. if you have two instances of a guy that is saying, i know terrorists and i know people and i want to kill people, that is a totally different thing. that is what we call predication and that enables you to keep stitching that evidence together. mark: let me ask you about the signature proposals of a major party candidate. let's start with donald trump. his signature proposal is, a an on muslims and says we should have a ban on all muslim immigrants that have countries with proven terrorist ties. how do you feel about that proposal? >> it is unworkable and unrealistic. you cannot exclude people based on their religions as i think speaker ryan or somebody pointed out today.

would inflame the situation and make it worse and we would probably have a worse lone wolf, copycat ratio without that. i think that is a poor idea. john: secretary and clinton and barack obama think the answer is, part of the answer lies in more stringent gun safety measures, particularly banning the sale on assault weapons, reviving the 1990's assault weapon ban. >> i am not one that thinks the gun commits the offense. the ar-15 was a standard military rifle, standard five shot rifle and if you alter it, which is a legal and make it fully automatic or put in a clip or a magazine of 20 or 50 shells, of course, that is quite different but that is an independent office. you think the democrats have it wrong and the republicans have it wrong dealing with this problem? >> yes. i think the people in the justice department.

the head of the fbi was a deputy general. loretta lynch headed the attorney's office in new york and she knows this stuff. it is just a question of resources. the stakes are so high. i think you do have to acknowledge that there is such a thing as islamic jihad and that is the name of the game here and that is the case that has to be made and that is what isis is all about. mark: what would you say in the realm of national security and foreign policy is barack obama's greatest achievement. >> i am a bad person to ask because i think the iran deal, buying 10 years of slowdown, that is a long time and i do think, i had a lengthy conversation with the former president of iran and became persuaded that the people of want to tilto western.

mark: why does that make you a bad person to ask? >> because i am the only former republican of the united states that things like that. john: some think that makes you a good person. >> i give him an enormous amount of credit for that. the whole world was screaming at him and he stuck to his guns and he got it done. ld, we are not we done with you. you will have a little bit more interrogation after the break. if you are watching us in washington dc, you can also listen to us on the radio. we will be right back. ♪

♪ mark: we are back with bill weld

the libertarian party candidate for vice president, also the former governor of massachusetts. on the last segment, you refer to yourself as a republican and then corrected or so. >> it just popped out. mark: a lot of people in the party in the convention question your shift from party of the republican party's the libertarian party. was that is when she made with gut head, got or heart -- or heart? some people suspect it was a matter of convenience. >> it did not seem like a switch to me. i have always self identified with the libertarians. with never comfortable socially conservative movements with the republican platform so i had to wear that on my back in a way. i now feel free at last now that i do not have to support that

part of the republican party dogma. you aree area where libertarian on economic policy, i just want you to explain the american disabilities act into law, your big -- you are a big 10th amendment guy. why should washington tell the state of massachusetts that private businesses, how they have to spend money to configure their businesses so that people with disabilities can be customers? > i suspect you libertarian party platform would not espouse that. i think that was the older bush. i knew it was very important to him, so i more than sat still for that and the family act which is what you could call intrusive. i do not know about that. family makes my heart go pitter pat. i think those were both h w bush

and i do support both of them. to roll back the american with disabilities act and say we are going to take out all of these ramps, that would be a bit much. john: if i were going to describe you as cecile richards on social matters and steve forbes on economic matters, you would not reject those? >> no, that is right. i think steve forbes was probably a jack kemp guy. we try to successfully get christie whitman elected of governor of new jersey. on the social side, abortion, a-ok? partial-birth abortion, a-ok? >> i am not sure i want the government making any of those decisions. john: that is what i mean. you do not believe there should be any restrictions placed on those? >> a bunch of men in washington making decisions about what some

woman is going to do about the most intimate of her decisions? no. john: governor johnson is most famous and about to get more famous as you guys begin campaigning about legalizing drugs. how far would you go with legalizing drugs. just marijuana, hard drives, everything -- hard drugs, everything? >> i have endorsed the marijuana legalization ballot measure in massachusetts for this year. that was kind of a close one. when i was a prosecutor we used to say that marijuana was a gateway drug. i do not know. i just see alcohol dimming so much more damage than marijuana. i can see a logical argument for that. the other stuff is contextual at this point. john: you do not want to go as a hard-core libertarian that says, full free market that says all drugs all the way, up to cocaine and heroin? are statesthese

issues perhaps not federal issues, but let's see what happens with the few states that of the marijuana and it will be an indicator. the jury seems to be mixed on colorado right now. policy, whatstic has been president obama's greatest achievement? >> i endorsed him in 2008 and i thought he had a disappointing first term. i think he started to pick it up a little bit the last 18 months or so. of course, i very much agree with them on cuba and executive orders that he did with immigration, so it is easy to think a president is doing a better job once he starts doing things you very much agree with. president,t elected you and your front running mate, governor johnson would have to win some big states. what are those? justthink at this point we went to have the contrast made between us and the two major parties. we do not agree with either major party.

we are socially compassionate, inclusive. we are fiscally conservative. we were rated the two most fiscally conservative governors in the middle 1990's, so we really cut the budget, we know how to do that and we think that the democrats, to judge by the primary this year would probably raise taxes and spend a lot, a lot of money that we think hollows of the economy to a certain point. gets as a wider audience to know you although you have been a player on the national stage, tell people about your family. >> i have been married twice, have five kids to my first wife, susan roosevelt and three stepchildren with my second wife susan marshall. i grew up in a teddy roosevelt household in my second wife is a writer so i am really the father of eight. john: that is an impressive

achievement on its own. i want to ask you about economics just because you talk about being conservative on economics, not wanting to spend a lot of government money and low taxes. when you look at hillary clinton's platform and what she advocates, which of those, which concerns you more? there are a lot of republicans that fine trump as problematic as a democratic platform. >> i do not have a sense of the spending level of mr. trump's proposals. i think they are all over the place. , and i thought wednesday forbes ran for president and got into the flat tax pretty deeply, i think you could run a generous federal government relatively on a 19% flat tax and if you really ch your billn you could run on a 15% flat tax.

gary johnson is more attracted to the idea of a consumption tax , and we will talk it through, but that seems a little regressive. they tax reform, guess. john: one of the places where they are in agreement, neither one of them is a full free trader at this point. >> that is awful. john: how do you feel about that? >> i think it is inexcusable to say they do not support the transatlantic partnership. i am certain about that. since the time of reagan and clinton and after, i can remember being in the bill clinton white house with newt gingrich and myself and bill clinton counting votes with two days to go on the north american free trade agreement. i think it is doubtful that mrs. clinton with signed a free-trade agreement or the welfare reform act of 1996 if it came to her desk now. i thought clinton did a good job moving to the center.

john: one last question, what was your biggest accomplishment that you are most proud of is governor? >> we put in the work requirement for welfare and the expense dropped 75% the next year. that indicated that that was a good idea. the other one was we put in standards for high-stakes a andg for 10th grade ever since then, massachusetts ranks number one in reading and mathematics. john: i do not think there is more of a governor more energetic about st. patrick's day. >> that went with the territory. mark: thank you for coming on. we will see you out there. >> i appreciate it. with we will be right back a little bit more on our new bloomberg politics national poll right after this. ♪

♪ mark: we are back with a little bit more from our brand new politics national poll, the first major telephone survey done of the nation since the orlando shooting. there have been a lot of policy ideas, political insinuations flying around, so we thought we would test a couple of them. one thing we ask likely voters was whether like some republicans have an argument, law enforcement agencies should increase surveillance of muslim communities in america, even if it conflicts with civil liberties. voters we spoke to did not like that, 27% said they agreed with the proposal to increase surveillance and 69% said they disagree. america is rare that agrees with civil liberties. this is good news for the

clinton campaign, politically and surprising that it is so high in the wake of what happened over the weekend. john: i am surprised. who knows, as we have set a couple of times, we had one night in the field after orlando. it may be in the coming days the these numbers change as core of orlando sinks and deeper. i agree with you. it is surprising that these numbers are that wide, especially when you think about other questions that we asked on this poll that were a lot closer, as we discussed earlier, the split on the assault weapons 50%.s 50% to this is very unpopular and will give clinton a lot of confidence in the arguments she is making if she sees that number. another thing we asked voters, the weight some republicans have also been insinuating, including donald trump most forcefully, president obama has not taken

forceful action to stop the messick terrorism because he sort of sides with muslims. 30% said they likely agree with that statement. 51%, again, big number, they say they disagree, so again, mark, one of the areas where we are less polarized than we may have thought and where donald trump is finding less purchase than what it would've assumed how those things fared during a republican nomination. mark: most of that support for donald trump's positions coming from republicans. he is notgap means getting much democratic support and a lot of independence deciding on that. .hat will be interesting to see donald trump has been under a lot of pressure from democrats and the press and some republicans to start moderating some of his positions on issues of controversy to try to focus more on the economy, to focus on the record of obama with foreign

policy rather than emphasizing the issues related to national security, civil liberties, immigration, muslim-americans and this will create for a lot of republicans a concern that donald trump has from their point of view talking about the wrong things. john: interesting and sort of confusing given the fact that opinions on ae still trump's proposals, in margin of 45-41 trump is seen handlers as better to the crisis if you were commander-in-chief. he still has some cards to play in this area. mark: of all the numbers in the poll, that will be the number to find the most heartening. the reality is secretary clinton would like to be ahead on the number. she would like to think that americans see her experience better equipping her for that, lead, withinsmall

the margin of air shows you the strength is still his biggest calling card when it comes to national security. ♪ we are going to have more from our national poll on her website. you can look at it right now at bloomberg politics.com and more data on the poll. we will be right back. ♪

♪ john: coming up on "bloomberg until tomorrow, for myanmar, sayonara.

mark: you're watching "bloomberg west." president obama angrily rejected assistance from republicans that the united states should

describe terrorism's that happened to be muslim to be radical islam is. he said the term of validate islamic state and apply that america is at war with an entire faith. ms. tree ourma: reat our fellow citizens. his remarks came following a meeting with his national security council. french authority and say a man described as a john hardy intruder made a video after he's fatally stabbed an off-duty police commander and his partner. authorities say in the video the man says, i just killed a police officer and his wife. their three-year-old son was held hostage yesterday but was rescued when police stormed a home and kill the attacker. russian government hackers penetrated the computer network of the democratic committee. the intruders gained access to the entire database of