♪ >> welcome to the spooky addition of the best of all due -- "with all due respect." this monday, halloween, will mark the countdown to election day. if that wasn't frightening enough this week on the show, we , covered and obamacare scare. first, we discussed whether it was a wise decision for donald trump to take time off of the campaign trail. >> less than two weeks before the election, donald trump did what every underdog presidential candidate would do, attend a hotel ribbon-cutting for his -- with his family. here in washington, d.c.

there has been some head scratching in the media with critics accusing trump of foolishly taking time away from his campaign to promote his business interests. the team says it is a perfect example of his management and leadership ability. for his part, trump said -- he touted his hotel and said that the project was finished under budget and ahead of schedule and promised to bring that to -- that kind of ethic to washington. after that event, i asked trump about a very personal speech. -- about what was for him a very personal speech today. mr. trump: i was just trying to say we built a great building. we took it out of the doldrums one of the great structures in , the country. it was very important because in underught it

budget, under schedule. our country, we cannot build a highway, a bridge, fix a tunnel. we are in such trouble so i'm very happy with how this worked up. this building has turned out to be so amazing. >> how does the building connect to presidential aspirations? mr. trump: under budget, ahead of schedule. it is very simple. you look at what is going on. $20 trillion. that was really -- now also i , wanted to come and stop. it takes an hour and a half, and we do it. what it really says is you can do things under budget and great work. this will be one of the great hotels in the world. under budget and ahead of schedule. our country has to do things under budget and ahead of schedule. >> we will have more of that interview later in the program. after our talk, trump went back out on the campaign trail. to the battleground state of north carolina. john, was going to this hotel opening a discretion -- distraction for smart clinical -- distraction or a small -- smart political move?

well, i would say, mark that if donald trump had spent , his entire campaign talking about his prowess as a builder, building a message architecture around that this event today , would have been on message and effective in making the argument he was making. as it happens it seems random , and kind of tailor-made to generate the kind of news coverage it has generated were -- where people look at it and say this is donald trump looking past election day and focusing on his business interests and not spending time on the presidency. mark: as is often the case, the campaign did not lay enough groundwork. i thought it was one of the best speeches he had given. it was somatic. -- thematic. he was calm and optimistic about the future of america. not particularly negative about hillary clinton. i don't know if he will give the speech ever again, but if he gave a version of this at the commission, and had driven that

mission -- message, i think he would be doing better. in terms of style it was one of , the most natural and heartfelt speeches i have heard him give. getting off the campaign trail i , think people are making way too much of it. washington represents and a compass meet for him. -- an accomplishment for him. makes sense to me. john: i would say maybe candidates do get off the campaign trail and give really focused speeches. they usually do it in may, june, or july, not the last two weeks, especially when they are behind. >> no question. >> look like so many trump , teaches, i think we are saying -- speeches i think we are , saying the same thing. if he had given the speech before the third debate, he had -- would be in a better position. but he didn't, so he's not. same with the speech. mark: definitely too little, too

late to be a game changing speech. a very well-written speech which isn't often the case for donald trump. in an interview for "the circus," our showtime series, in conjunction with bloombergpolitics, i spoke to trunk -- trump after the event and i asked about what his opponents have insane. -- his opponents have been saying. mr. trump: i wouldn't be surprised. mark: she said it is a new hotel, same story. mr. trump: let me say we had no undocumented workers. a false report was written that they found a couple out of the thousands that built it. we had no undocumented workers and in fact we used e-verify for every single worker. every single worker was e-veri y ied.

a newspaper came over and said i think that person is undocumented. every single worker was documented and perfect. mark: are there foreign products in the building? >> that i don't know. i would like it to make it so but our country does not make things anymore. china, mexico, germany, they are making all of our products. this is one of the reasons i'm running. i know how to turn it around. the problem we have is when you build something like this, so much of the bidding has to go to other countries because we don't make the products anymore. television sets i would love to , buy television sets made in the u.s. but they are all made in south korea and japan. mark: does it feel different we? the polls? mr. trump: it didn't, really. you know, when i'm speaking in front of 25,000 people like last night -- we have amazing crowds all over. last night we had 25,000 and we

had 15,000 that couldn't get in. the reason they told me is stampede. market: people have told me that this is a great trump speech. mr. trump: i love that they are saying that. they are all different. that speech wouldn't be well received if i was in front of 25,000 people. with a spirited -- with a spear to make america great again. but in front of a hotel, i think that speech was appropriate. mark: you redefined how candidates talk about polls. some polls, now you are winning. we have one where you are top in florida. what is her journal sense of where you are in the battleground states? mr. trump: i think we are winning. i think we are winning ohio, winning florida. i think we will do fantastically in pennsylvania. i think we are winning north carolina and soon new hampshire. we are going up there.

soon. -- you know,on when i go there, people say -- look, it's jobs. fix our military. it's -- don't let the world take advantage of us. a greatknow if i'm messenger, but the message is absolutely the right message. mark: you think you're going to get to the 270 electoral votes? mr. trump: i think we will win. mark: what do you want the american people to know about the wikileaks e-mails? mr. trump: wikileaks shows how crooked the entire thing is. it shows how unbelievably dishonest the whole thing is. you know what else? i don't know john podesta. he says she has bad instincts. honestly i wouldn't want anyone talking about me the way that he talks about her. mark: are you under the weather? >> i feel good. mr. trump -- mr. trump: i feel great.

i made eight stops yesterday. don't put that in my head. so far, i have not. that's not me. we will win. i really believe it. mark: you really believe you will win? if you thought you were going to lose, would you tell us? mr. trump: there's a big difference. we are going to win. look at it state-by-state. we are coming out ahead. believe me. mark: you're not worried about utah, arizona, georgia? mr. trump: i think arizona's going to be great. obamacare, failing 100% in arizona. they are having tremendous crime problems. mark: the polls have gotten closer. mr. trump: sure they have got , closer. i have a third-party candidate which is not help. -- helping. we are going to terminate

obamacare. you have to terminate. disaster. arizona, higher than anybody else, they will be a 100% increase. hillary clinton wants to keep it. she wants to make it more expensive. don't forget, we are also going to be doing a massive tax cut. mark: you're not desolate -- necessarily explain what you will do. do you want to revise health -- health? richard trump: no. obamacare is a disaster. i have companies with obamacare. i have contractors with obamacare. those people are suffering. i do not bring them out to talk about obamacare. i just brought them out to show what a great place that is. mark: stay tuned, more of the best of "with," right after this." ♪

mark: joining us now to talk about the stresses of the election cycle and how to handle them, the coanchor of "abc news nightline," the great dan harris. also, the officer -- author of "the 10% happier app." 10% happier incorporated, you might say. dan, welcome. so we know a lot of stress is pervasive for people. dan: more than half of americans say the election is giving them anxiety. 25% of americans say that it gets in the way of them doing their work because of political discussions in the workplace. have lostat they

friends over this election. it's pretty bad. >> it's not just dug? t-rex no question. also doctors all over the , country are reporting people with heart palpitations, stress eating, compulsive cleaning. not a problem. mark: so this is a rare segment on the show. we are prepending to be a morning show -- pretending to be a morning show here. what am i supposed to do about it dan? dan: i think there three big tips. one, this is tough to say on television limit your media , consumption. also, the big piece of advice is meditation. with all -- just the show. -- this show. big piece from doctors across the country, privately and publicly, meditation. i'm obviously a big proponent of that. i do think it really helps. we have posted free guided meditations. >> where? >> thank you, mark.

on our app. 10% happier. >> smoking dope? >> there's no research. i don't want to name any names. [laughter] there, applauding vigorously. >> that would be my advice. >> yes, smoke out. >> someone who has never done it before, with 12 days to go? dan: yes. tatian -- that medic meditation works quickly. i don't do meditation as some magical metaphysical fix. it's brain exercise. and just the way when you exercise your body, your muscles and heart get stronger. when you exercise her brain, you get less stressed out by your emotions. we feel helpless, angry. we are allowing that to get us into arguments with coworkers or

spouses. you are kicking the dog. meditation helps you not get so yanked around. >> there's the common, general perception that meditation is ullcrap,dippy, b bullpucky. you are saying know this is a legitimate thing. dan: i was under the view -- like cat stevens. meditation rings. >> you say like those are bad things. [laughter] dan: we now know that he smokes dope and likes finger cymbals. correlation is not necessarily causation. anyway, i was under the view -- of the view that it was weird for a long time. then i looked at the science. the science shows it helps your immune system, lowers blood pressure, and i give it a shot. there are plenty of weird kinds of meditation you can do.

i think if you do the straight up, secular kind, which i am a proponent of, you are in good hands. >> it doesn't have to be transcendental to work? >> you can transcend in a lot of environments. >> and can be ok? dan: a lot of people do tm who are pretty straight. >> you have a new segment on this? >> next week. i just got off the train from philadelphia. we convened trump supporters and clinton supporters together in the room. it was super tents. they have serious disagreements. by the end, actually, they andted talking about -- this is going to sound grandiose -- about shared humanity. these are people who had just come from basically shooting daggers out of their eyes at one another. >> these strong supporters were

singing kumbayah to each other? dan: something to that effect. mark: coming up, hall of famer bill bradley will be with us when we come right back. ♪

♪ mark: half a century ago, lyndon b. johnson released an ad that was considered one of the most powerful political attacks in american history. it was called daisy and run in 1964 against barry goldwater. picking flower petals, just before nuclear explosion. now, people of the buckeye state are getting their own trump

focused, daisy style ad. the spot is called careful. take a look. >> one nuclear bomb can kill one million people. that is more than all the men, women, and children living in columbus, ohio. usingre is talk of maybe nuclear weapons. no one wants to hurt -- year that. >> well, why do we make them? [echoes] mark the shadowy super pac that : is running that at plans to -- advertisement plans to put at least $75,000 to run that add in columbus. the news here, the man behind the effort. one-time democratic presidential candidate, bill bradley is a , well-known hater of super pac. -- super pac's. he is here to explain what made him get a super pac to help run

the ad. >> you know, i think the nuclear issue transcends all issues. the president calculates the enemy. if he doesn't have the leadership skills to defuse a crisis, then it doesn't matter what his position is on other issues. whether it is campaign finance reform, abortion, trade, or immigration. because we will all be toast. i happen to think it is an up or thing forn important people to ask. who do i trust with my life? i think that is for republicans to ask, as well as democrats. we are dealing with very serious issues. i think about donald trump and i say he does not have the ability or experience to be able to defuse a crisis diplomatically. mark: so, why not just go to ohio and give speeches about

this? why engage in the big-money politics with a super pac that you have derided? >> i think this is the most powerful way to reach the will. -- people. you have heard me speak. [laughter] i'm not going to sweep the crowd, that's for sure. this is something you might ask -- how did this come about? for almost a year, i watched the outrageous innuendos of trump. you know. the slurring of african-americans, latinos, and muslim americans. the data grading -- the denigrating of women. threatening to put his opponent in prison, attacking the american democracy with not saying whether he is going to abide by the results. saying dangerous things all the time. i said, you know, i'm appalled. what can a citizen do? and so, i had a conversation with my friend torch lucas who

-- friend, george lucas, who came up with the idea of a commercial that would essentially educate people about what nuclear war means. i then took it to another friend at an agency in boston, who produced it. i then had it tested by the firm of my former communications director. i then started a super pac because that is the only way he can get it on and i raised , money through contributors and we bought time in ohio for people to contemplate what might happen if donald trump was in the position with his finger on the nuclear button. mark: creative director, george lucas? not bad. i want to get to the question about testing this ad. there's been a variety of things trump has said on for policy that many consider dangerous. a wide variety have condemned him.

the nuclear issue seems to be a big one. it is amazing that people don't discuss it more. that he is kind of in favor of nuclear percolation -- proliferation. is this something that still run -- resonates as a real threat? >> i think so. we are closer to nuclear war today than we were during the cold war. people are blissfully unaware of the danger they are in. so this is to make it clear to , people that this is a danger. mark: for whatever reason, people no longer -- they are fixated on terrorism. they are fixated on domestic terrorism. there's not a wide discussion of this. so, is it inadequate in ohio to think that this was all that? >> once the president says the missiles are gone, they're gone. they can pull them back. -- can't pull them back.

i think there is a question of personality. donald trump is erratic. he is undisciplined. he lashes out. that is not the person we want with the nuclear button. i think you need somebody who is steady, not someone who is impulsive. the real question is also focus. look at donald trump in his three debates. how long did he focus? he did not even focus an hour and a half. if you are president, you have to be able to focus on it for seven. -- 24/7. i think he's a danger to america. mark: we only have a minute, but regarding the campaign, you two have a history. talk about tax reform and what impressions he had a few and you he had a you.

you had a few of him. >> i was on his early loser list i think. [laughter] there was an issue related to his casinos in atlantic city which he thought the answer was , sports gambling. the idea is not what happened in the past, but what the american people have to decide today and what kind of country we want to become. it didn't please them too much. the idea here is not what happened in the past. but what the american people have to decide today and the kind of country they want this to become. i travel around the country. i has for 50 years. as a politician, a businessman, and a basketball player. i have an idea for what is best about america. when i ran for president back in , i found ithic era thought people were tolerant, generous, innovative.

that is the america that trump is running against. mark: stay tuned, we discussed the obamacare news that broke this week and what it means for the election cycle -- right after this. ♪ . .

when you're on hold, your business is on hold. that's why comcast business doesn't leave you there. when you call, a small business expert will answer you in about 30 seconds. no annoying hold music. just a real person, real fast. whenever you need them. great, that's what i said. so your business can get back to business. sounds like my ride's ready. don't get stuck on hold. reach an expert fast. comcast business. built for business.

mark: republicans are on offense after the announcement that obamacare averages will go up 20%. donald trump talking about this pretty much all day, including at length in sanford, florida. mr. trump: i will ask congress to put a bill on my desk getting rid of this disastrous law. basically 5%? forget 25%. it will be 60%, 70%, 80%, 90%. in the great state of arizona, it is over 100%.

even bill clinton admitted that obamacare is the craziest thing in the world where people wind up with her premiums doubled and coverage cut in half. then he was forced to take it back the next day because it might he suffered greatly. this is where of the single most important reasons we must win on november 8. mark: trump also warned people will see fewer insurance options under obamacare, and he vowed to give people more choices if he becomes president. democrats are pushing back. they say the subsidies for most people who cannot afford insurance on their own will be offset with subsidies against the rising right next year, but this obamacare news has been a juicy fillet of redmeat for conservatives warned about rate hikes of less consumer choice.

>> the story of obamacare premiums going up 25%, we need to stop for a second, because this is outrageous, and it ought to have everybody in this country up in arms. by all rights, everybody in this country ought to be flipping mad and feeling betrayed and lied to by the democratic party and by obama and, by extension, and hillary clinton ought to be in deep trouble because she is out there advocating this thing. mark: so, bill clinton, you heard trump say got in trouble big league john: -- john: big league. mark: again talking in north carolina. mr. clinton: you keep what is good about the law and attack the problems.

she is the only person who can vote for who wants to do that. he just said, i am going to repeal this law, trust me on the rest. look, what are the problems with the law? we can all tick 'em off. the co-pays or did up to bulls or premiums are too high. mark: republicans are jumping all over this. is this a game changer for republicans or are they overstating what they have? john: where do i start -- first of all, bigly, not big league. also, that hat, i don't think i have seen before. mark: you've got to pay closer attention. john: first of all -- most of the people in the country do not need to be outraged. most people get their insurance from their employers. there has been a stabilization in the way the public views this law.

it's a little more unpopular. this is not going to revolutionize back and start to reach people who -- the might be some, a small number -- you are not going to like the premiums going up, but the idea this will revolutionize the race, most republicans have hated the law for a long time and now will hate it even more, just like rush does. it will not change the dynamics of the presidential campaign -- mark: if other candidates could talk about this in a disciplined way, i think it could make a difference. john: i thought we were talking about the presidential race primarily? mark: i'm talking about the old thing. almost every republican on the ballot does not support the affordable care act. almost every democrat does. you will see places where the races are closed -- particularly in states where the nl statistics show -- take arizona.

and in the presidential race, to ul, you will see -- in the presidential race, too, you will see an energized race. trump has exposed the fact that he does not understand the law very well. john: a lot of outside groups like the koch brothers and others have focused on this issue. this will be helpful, i agree with you, possibly in some legislative races, senate races, republicans will get a talking point and it could help them. but i will say for all of them it would be easier to take advantage of this is they had an alternative. [bell rings] donald trump saying there will be more choice under my plan -- there is plan on health care. mark: it could help them from being blown out because he is currently on a path to being blown out. john: a new wikileaks update. new e-mails posted on that show -- and among other things, vicious infighting between

chelsea clinton and longtime clinton aide doug band. but they offer a window into how clinton felt to handle be unorthodox malpractices when they were revealed in march 2015. the first is an e-mail that seems to depict that president obama knew about the private e-mail account, even though he said publicly at the time he learned about it through his reports. referring to e-mails between the president and clinton when she used the private account, mills wrote "we need to clean this up." the second e-mail turning heads is a colloquy between john podesta and the center for american progress president, who complained clinton felt team failed to get out ahead of the e-mail server story. he says that they did not disclose the private account sooner because "they wanted to get away with it." mark, i will ask you the same question you asked me. conservative media a let's are jumping all over all of these the clusters -- disclosures.

are these as big a game changer as republicans are portraying them to be and hope they will be? mark: these are pretty bad. we have had days and days of this. these are as bad as they are as far as an atmosphere of attempting to cover-up clinton behavior. it's so problematic for them that none of these are from hillary clinton the. still staffers talking about things. no smoking gun. i do not think the dam is going to burst. i don't think this is a game changer of the presidential level, but it does create a momentum for the republicans and energize the republican base as any that have been disclosed so far. john: "we need to clean this up." obviously they were in damage control mode when this came to light. that does not shock me. there are a lot of questions about the possibility president obama had an anonymous account or was connected to every clinton for private account and what he knew, but that story has been put to bed a long time ago.

the white house came out and said, you know what, the president said that he did not know she had a home server -- mark: the damaging thing for a president clinton, not in terms of getting elected, it shows that there is finger-pointing and suspicion and enablers around her and powerful people cannot stop the enablers from enabling. john: i disagree with that. mark: up next, we talk about the impact of wikileaks on the election, my search for julian assange, and john farrell discussion with roger stone, next. ♪

♪ john: you have no direct contact with julian assange. >> correct. john: you have a go between that is a good friend of yours. >> yes. john: are you suggesting,

through your mutual friend, in the next three weeks, wikileaks will release or could release information that is substantially more damaging to hillary clinton than what it has release already? >> yes. i think the race is close enough and the electorate is volatile enough, anything could substantially change the race. throat may need some breaks, but to say he is out of it, it is over -- nothing is over until we say it is. mark: i'm at the embassy of ecuador here in knightsbridge. this is the area where julian assange has lived -- basically in captivity of his own choosing -- system 12. we do know he obsessively looks at the wikileaks twitter account. we are treating of the guy. we will see what happens. >> where are you guys from? mark: where are we from? the u.s.

is there anything i can do? can i handwrite a question? i would literally like him to answer one question. it would take maybe 30 seconds. what can expect of the podesta e-mails? do you think the u.s. media has underreported? ok. he can just write a short answer. >> we got an answer. mark: my question was, what aspect of the podesta e-mails do you think the u.s. media has underreported? one word -- everything.

>> that was part of this week's episode of "the circus," in conjunction with bloombergpolitics. and we have our two guests from the nation's capitol. julian assange says "everything" when asked what we are undercovering in this race? has wikileaks been undercovered, it are some of the most useful revelations for the race and the next administration? >> i think they have a point that at least initially they were under covered. i think they are getting a lot of coverage now. but in terms of what has been revealed, the specifics are not all that revelatory, not all that shocking.

but what it does is a really gives you a behind-the-scenes look at the kind of handwringing and strategizing that goes on internally within a campaign and also for those of us who are junkies -- you know, a lot of the back fighting, a lot of the organizational tension. it's interesting in that the clinton operation on the outside seems to have run pretty -- in a pretty disciplined way. certainly a big, big contrast from her last campaign in 2008. what we have seen from these e-mails is they are not without tension and some of the old problems, including some of the clinton hangers on have continued? >> you think there has been a smoking gun and how much of the level of coverage can be expelled by media bias? how much by donald trump just making so much news on other

fronts that it is kind of hard to stay focused on the first thing? >> the first batch of these e-mails came out the same day and the same weekend that the truck "access hollywood" tape featuring his lewd remarks about unwanted advances toward women came out, so i do think it was natural the trump remarks were covered over and above the e-mails, and that is largely then -- largely why they got less coverage. there was less excitement and attention paid to be subsequent round of e-mails that have come out. i think slightly understandably. the smoking gun, i would say, not only do they reinforce what people already thought about hillary clinton, that there is a tremendous amount of strategizing about how she is presented to the public and all of the tensions that between the forces in the clinton global initiative, the financial

aspects of that, versus her public appearances, what bill clinton is doing -- but they have not disabused to the public of any notions the public has had about her, her honesty, and i do think, though donald trump is getting the bulk of the attention right now during the campaign, once she gets into office -- which it does seem she is likely to do -- the sorts of things will haunt her throughout her entire presidency. >> there is been a lot work coverage in the conservative media about the e-mails -- "daily caller" in particular seems to be flooding those out. is there anything that has the potential to break through and become more of an issue in the day today, the remaining weeks of this campaign? eliana: i think her comment about wanting free trade and open borders is certainly going to haunt her with the far left. her remark about free trade well. and a remark about open borders

will haunt her with the right. what you hear from immigration hawks, they are considered feverish and crazy for saying what some on the left really want is open borders, and here we have hillary clinton saying really saying that, outright in her e-mails. it will be fair for her to say these are crazy right-wingers accusing the left of something they don't really want and not being -- not coming to the table with good faith about protecting the border and securing the border. no, that is what she set out right. the other thing, what really looks like data play on morocco. she was not set the terry of state, but she was that secretary of state, but she was running for president. that's pretty damning. john: i'm next one of the highlights of the week -- first lady michelle obama hits the campaign trail with hillary clinton. we talk with a reporter on the clinton beat in one moment ♪ .

mrs. obama: i know there are some folks out there who have commented it has been unprecedented for a sitting first lady to be so actively engaged in a presidential campaign. and that may be true. but what is also true is this is truly an unprecedented election. [cheers and applause] mrs. obama: and that is why i am out here. mark: that is more of michelle obama, the star of hillary clinton's rally in north carolina. what do you think of the body language? i remember bill clinton and barack obama did one event in 2008 and the body language was not that warm. it seemed pretty warm to me today. reporter: yeah, it was.

they cannot together, not totally in the classic clinton arm in arm pose, that you would see maybe with a vice president, but very, you know, close together, and michelle obama made a point of saying she considers clinton a friend. i think that was in some ways i'm not to the perception that they do not have a particularly close relationship. it is certainly true they do not have an anonymous amount of experience with one another and their relationship was not so great eight years ago in the aftermath of the 2008 election. it has grown considerably deeper and warmer sense. i thought michelle obama had substantive things to say today about what she thought clinton could do as president that go

beyond a standard one democrat in endorsing another kind of stump speech. john: i think one of the big stories of 2016 is the undeniable reality that michelle obama is the biggest star of the democratic party. she is performing at a level even higher than her husband, but she is not out as often as her husband who is doing a lot of campaigning. how much will we see her between now and election day? anne: a large amount, a surprisingly large amount even by the clinton campaign expectations. they will tell you, they are surprised michelle obama wants to do as much as she is volunteering to do. and they are not pressuring her to do more, they say, but she came to them with a number of proposals about things she wanted to talk about. and including today's event, the side-by-side with hillary clinton. i think one data point that is telling as they booked a really big venue today.

it is a stadium that in some configurations conceit 14,000 people. -- can seat 14,000 people. the way that it was configured today, there was fear, and there was a capacity crowd of about 11,000 according to the fire marshal. that is more than twice the size of any but the very, very two or three largest clinton rallies we have seen all year. crowd sizes at recent rallies -- and we are two weeks from the election. crowd sizes at recent rallies have been more in the 1700, 2500, 3000 range. certainly not 11,000. mark: i want to switch over the wikileaks and the doug dan disclosures. and christina palmeri has been talking, everything she said was the russians, the russians, everything is the russians. they plan to keep that up? will that be there answer for the next two weeks, or something going to force their hand?

anne: well, they do not think that something is going to force their hands yet. it certainly appears with 12 days left they can get it out by continually saying, this is stolen property, by the way it was stolen by the russians. has anyone taken a good hard look at donald trump's connection to the russians? all good questions, all valid points, but the side the mounting pile of dirty laundry we see in these e-mails. notably, they do not dispute the authenticity of these e-mails. they simply won't confirm it. john: anne, do you think -- donald trump once again giving vladimir putin praises, a gift to the clinton campaign -- have they gone through all of john podesta's gmail now so they know what julian assange has so they know what can come out between

now and election day? anne: god, you would hope so, right? just you know the potential trove that is out there. one thing we really don't know from the outside is exactly when it was clear to the campaign that this material had been stolen and exactly how much they knew about the size and scope of that theft. podesta apparently never deleted anything. he had many, many years of e-mail stored in his gmail. so, apparently with one hack, whoever did it was able to go back many years spanning podesta's time out of government, at the white house, and as he was the chairman and weighting of the campaign. so, it was an awful lot exposed there. you have to think the clinton campaign and lawyers have been

going through that for months. we knew that they knew that there was a risk out there. we did not know exactly what it was. mark: we talked earlier about what you just in a seated -- we have seen weeks and weeks and days of these e-mails -- the batch reduce yesterday produced front page stories in your paper, the "new york times." what about that memo? anne: it do a lot of lines we have only seen the traces of before, it drew them quite explicitly. and beyond that, here you have doug van, once one of bill clinton's most loyal and trusted, closest aides appearing to point fingers at the boss, right? at bill clinton, saying, look, how come you're saying i should not be doing some of these

overlapping -- having some of this overlapping business internal relationships, some of these, when bill clinton has far more than i do and has even greater exposure, if you consider it a risk, greater exposure than i do? that's an extraordinary thing for someone in his position, and frankly who all of his position to bill clinton, to say. one interesting aspect of it, i think it raised the profile of it and caused us to write about it in the detail we did -- here you see john podesta trying to attempt this down a little bit and saying, hey, cool it. i don't think that is quite the language you want to use. and he is saying, oh, no, that is exactly what i want to say and i want to defend myself. john: thank you very much for watching this edition of the best of "with all due respect." if you are watching is an washington, d.c., you can also watch is on the rate -- listen to us on the radio radio. we will see you again monday.

until then, for me and mark sayonara. ♪

david: welcome to "bloomberg businessweek." i am david gura. coming to you from inside the magazine's headquarters in new york. we will take you inside the donald trump presidential campaign. also, twitter has one revenue stream, the company's firehose. we will tell you about that. professional mermaids, yes, mermaids, taking to their business seriously. all of that on "bloomberg businessweek." ♪ david: we are here to talk about the cover story on donald trump with ellen pollock. editor-in-chief. we are here to talk about donald