carol: welcome to bloomberg businessweek. is the pay issue gap, and wait until you are about the gender gap that comes to stock options. jason: president macron once likened him to the god jupiter, but lately, his powers have started to falter. carol: first, we start with

another jampacked week in washington. ourking it down for us is correspondent philip. explaining how things like the supreme court process and trade policy are impacting the top agenda and midterm. the question over whether this acquisition tanks his nomination is a big one. and with the midterms coming so quickly, it is not clear they will have the time, if cap and does not work out, cap another -- to have a another process. on trade, the political ramifications of this are quite real. the chinese are quite calibrated in how they are going after certain issuance with their retaliatory tariffs, looking at agriculture, the other sections of the country. seeming to calibrate their response to trump voters in farm country.

matthew, when we think about the implications of this for the midterms, it feels like regardless of how the kavanaugh situation turns out, this will be an issue that both sides sink their teeth into to galvanize their respective electorate. is an issue that has played well for the democrats. it has fired up women voters. there are lots of estimates out there about how big this blue not justoing to be, taking back the house, which seems more likely than not, but whether the senate is in play too. also not hard to imagine that the president could use this to his advantage. the friction, to say the least, that he has with

the democrats on the hill. >> yeah. his comments about this have been "look, i feel very badly about cap, he is a great man. " he has also gone out of his way to criticize democrats, asking why are we hearing about this now. unclear of the timing, when her office was made aware of these accusations. but clearly, he is trying to make clinical hey -- political hay. speaking about politics, there are a lot of politics within the white house itself. thinking about the trade issue, not everybody agrees about how we should be determining new policy. you, mnuchin has one of robert lise hauser has another view. you really want that white house to be together. >> in the first year of the

administration, there really was this internal battle raging between your globalists, so to and garyur mnuchin's cohn, who resigned after the tariffs were announced. he left just five days after. and on the other side, you have navarro,ross, peter they have won the fight, it seems. they have got the ball. they are moving quite quickly on nafta, or at least trying to. tariffs are the tools they have decided is going to be the most effective in trying to bring your reshaping of the trade deals. washington is coming on on a big week on fed rates.

this week has a story about jay powell's first months in office, a story that leaves the politics section. jason: the fed chair is not supposed to be in the politics section, but president trump put him there. his tweets test the principle of central bank independence. carol: it does. one of our veteran fed watchers joins us now. yellen, he has made a concerted effort to go on capitol hill and pound the caucus, as he puts it. in the first six months, he has visited or spoken to about 45 lawmakers, roughly. amount three times the that his predecessor did over the same timeframe. ournd this, of course, is

tweeter in chief president trump , who has broken with decades long precedent and take an open, public hotshots at the fed -- pot shots at the fed. carol: next week, we have another meeting. the market is pricing in another increase. president trump has been very outspoken about not wanting higher rates. ability, test of his not just as a banker, but a politician, how he manages that. because he has stayed out of the spotlight by not reacting. >> this will be the first ther-trade increase since president went public with his displeasure. and this will be the first time when how will publicly beaver -- be pressed to respond. so how he responds, how he does

that, does he dismiss it? does he say the president can do it he wants, but we will do what congress has told us. it will be interesting how he does the delicate dance so that a punching become bag for trump. carol: you talked about what he has been doing, i love how your story starts, taking us back to july president trump gave an interview. at the same time, how is up on capitol hill talking to lobby and how the fed is doing. you talked to him about being a politician with a little p. i love that. this is a guy who understands government, he does not have the training like other central bankers. he is not a politician, but he understands how washington works. >> he has been around washington a while.

he knows his way around, he is comfortable in pressing the flesh. predecessors, in contrast, they were phd economists. they always seemed more comfortable in seminars or conferences than they did on capitol hill. but he does have these political instincts. it seems suited for this task, which is a very important one, protect our independence, our ability to carry out our policy without somebody sticking their nose in it. jason:jason: still ahead, jeff s explained why he hates to take meeting before 10 a.m.. carol: and when it comes to salary, women are missing out, and we have one more thing to add to that list, equity options. jason: this is bloomberg. ♪

carol: welcome back. jason: you can also find us online. carol: and on our mobile app. one of the stories we continue to follow has to do with amazon, always watching to see what new business bezos is getting into. we also took a look at the revenues. let's bring in taylor riggs with an interesting chart. like the top line, because it shows a clear picture of what they are doing. going down, things can look muddled. we are looking at top line revenue growth. normally, a company of the side that pulls in $200 billion of you'd expect a minute or high single-digit growth, but this company continues to blow it out of the water.

another reason why even at $1 trillion in market cap, economists are still bullish. jason: i kept looking at that chart and thinking "am i reading that right? " and that brings us to a withight, an interview jeff bezos thanks to our colleague david rubenstein. a rarewe have conversation with jeff business at the economic club in washington. filledwatch in a week with stories about amazon. about aith speculation new alexa devices, cars, and more. jason: there is always a lots to talk about when it comes to building a trillion dollar company and leadership. so here is a clip from the david rubenstein show. david starts by asking jeff about some legendary quirks. >> i get up early, i like to

putter in the morning, have breakfast with my kids before school . my puttering time is important for me. i like to do my high iq meetings before lunch. anything that is mentally challenging, that is a 10:00 meeting. because by 5:00, it's like, i can't think about this today. on sleep, i get eight hours of sleep, unless i am traveling in different time zones, sometimes it is impossible. but i am very focused on it. for me, i need eight hours of sleep. i think better, have more energy, my mood is better. executive, what do you really get paid to do? as a senior executive, you get paid to make a small number of high quality decisions.

your job is not to make thousands of decisions everyday. if the really worth it quality of those decisions might be lower because you are tired, grouchy, or any number of things? it is different if it is a startup company. if amazon was 100 people, it would be a different story, but amazon is not a starter. -- start-up. and all of my executives work the way i do. none of the people who report to me should be focused on the current quarter. carol: now, the gender pay gap. for a longn talking time about how women are underrepresented and underpaid across industries. unfortunately, we have a new twist to the conversation, the wealth gap created by stock options. we dig into how compensation packages are favoring men. jason: and that has big implications in places like silicon valley and the next

class of angel investors and business owners. here is rebecca greenfield with the information. >> we looked at 6000 companies, and the data is solid. womenhey found is that hold $.47 of equity for every dollar a manhole. -- man holds. that is over 50%. >> that is important, because this is literally and ofuratively the currency innovation, so implications just beyond dollars and cents. the money that can lead to down the line has a next financial affect. >> to be clear, lots of equity does not turn into anything, but we can see that equity can turn into a lots of money for a lots of people. a can mean you get to buy house, but it also means you become the next angel investor the next startup founder.

arguably, this is more impactful than the pay gap. carol: break it down, you spoke specifically about a young software engineer. we talked about people going in to startups. tell us about her experience. >> one of the women we talked to was an engineer at lyft. she got a pay offer, and knew a man who got a similar offer. they were sharing stories, and it turned out he was offered more equities than she had. shetook the job, but when got there, she asked around and it turned out that she had less equity than all of them. even though the recruiter told her equity was standard and could not be changed. when she pushed back, she got more. but if she had not been really aggressive then she would have been making less money. jason: one of the sub trends you

point out is the notion of miss s-levie --- mi leveling. >> when you join a company, they tell you this is the standard compensation, standard equity. and what i was told by a lawyer who handles these negotiations company will a tell you this is your level, whatever, and this is what we offer. that, often times, you are being hired for a position that is higher than that. thenf you just push back you will get the equity that you deserve. carol: i am curious about the legality of all of this. a company come out for a similar position and offer a man and woman with similar experience different pay packages and stock options? >> that is an interesting question. i am not exactly sure, but mis-leveing gives them some

cover. if they say this is the position you are doing and this is what we pay everyone. once we argue you do more work, then that is illegal. carol: macron has seen a setback. plus, florence continues to ravage homes in carolinas but one city is figuring out how to beat it. carol: this is "bloomberg businessweek." ♪

jason: welcome back, i'm jason kelly. carol: and i am carol massar. you can listen to us on the radio. new york, boston, and washington dc. jason: and in the bay area as well as london. section, french president macron's victory reverberated around the world, striking a blow for europe as

unified the rising tide of nationalism. some setbacks.d slowed, andwth has anti-european sentiment is growing. carol: call it his monumental challenge. he is now staking his credibility on next year's elections and is really aiming to show that the magic is not gone. let's catch up with editor christine. he had a state his future on being a leader in europe. to knit the countries closer together. and he had several proposals that he sketched out in broad strokes and now those seen at risk because of the loss of lyrical capital -- political capital. jason: how much of this is on him? how much of it is forces beyond his control? >> he has not helped himself,

definitely. 60% is on him. he called himself, at one point, jupiter, the king of gods. and he has spent the last year trying to walk that back, but still. this idea that i'm going to stun the world with the majesty of french power. i will use that power. know,stead, and you people just look at him and they feel like he is calloused. than 70% ofore people feel he is ruling for the rich. carol: it is interesting reading that story. was there any kind of support for what he wanted to do? in terms of making the region even tighter? has been this notion that he and angela merkel have common ground on these ideas. but the devil is in the details.

example,of having, for a joint fiscal budget. one finance minister. that, you know, would be very tough to negotiate which country gets that. right now, we're seeing all of the jockeying going around. this would be another very important post. some promises to his voters in terms of domestic issues, but has not really come through. if he had succeeded in that way, what his star be a little bit higher? to give him credit in the sense that these reforms he has pushed through are not going to yield results. it is not just france's economy. we are seeing, across the country, germany is losing and dynamism too. his government argues that there has been more hiring. in some of the things he has said really makes them come

across as somebody who does not care. there is a sense now, he understands there is a problem. and in the last month, we have seen a change. this month, he visited a homeless shelter, announced a new policy on poverty. he has been trying to soften his language. that, we understand beyond the statistics, the government reports, it is about people, and people are suffering. the politics section, we continue to check the aftermath of hurricane florence and returned to one of our favorite writers. he has become a leading chronicler of how cities cope with a ferocious climate. carol: the city focuses on north carolina's largest city. they tear them down and have been doing this for 20 years. jason: climate experts think this could be the blueprint for the rest of the country. but it has taken a lot of

political will. here are the details. >> i went to charlotte, north carolina just before florence saw the -- landed because they have one of the most interesting programs. they use their own money to buy out homes that keep on flooding. everybody points to charlotte as the example of how to defend against flood risk in the best possible way. i think hurricane florence is proving what is a good idea. jason: how did this come about? candidly, toising, see a government that is this forward-looking. this is not happening, obviously, at a federal level. what is triggering this? >> the answer is individual leadership. charlotte is not the most flood prone place, but from what i can tell, the stormwater utility really cares about this.

local diveble to get in to raise rates on local customers, not a huge amount of money. of money, theyt can afford to buy out dozens of homes a year. and over time, they have reduced the number of homes and their flood plans. that means that, though florence is a problem, will be less bad than otherwise. carol: you write this in your story. that no longer exists is, by definition, a house that can no longer flood. here is the point, remove those ines from flood prone areas those devastating storms that are increasingly happening. it also doesn't reduce costs when it comes to rescue efforts. that is the other side of this equation. >> i spoke with the gentleman who runs this program. he said it is not just a money thing. he is trying to think of all of the homes that, if they still

they will just put people in danger, but it means firefighters and police have to figure out how to get in, often by boat, often at night, and save lives. that means more danger for everyone. and that people come out, they go into shelters, they need federal aid. i do not want to paint this as an obvious picture, there are strong arguments for allowing building as often and widely as you can, affordability is an issue in this country, and lots of cities have issues finding land for homes. charlotte is saying "let's take the lance with the most risk, by them, tear them down so they are not a problem anymore." more peoplethat will look at charlotte and say, as our risk grows, we have to look at options like this. hoping for the best is not a great strategy. toyota ising up, behind in the race to create a driverless future.

dive into the challenges facing driverless cars. jason: this is "bloomberg

to rent a movie? showtime. or buy the hottest shows. even here? we've got you covered. now they are all yours. to take on the go. on any screen. bingo! alright! and watch whatever you buy. wherever you are. head to xfinity.com/stream to start watching. simple to rent, easy to buy, awesome to go.

"bloomberg businessweek." i had in this week's issue, engineers have 100 problems to solve in developing driverless cars. make it 101. we are talking about whether. -- weather. and the u.k. government

is having trouble getting anything else done. every weekeems like we are focusing on something that is going wrong for tesla. jason: another piece of bad news this week. we checked out the latest bump in the road for tesla and elon musk. back tweeted a few weeks claiming he was going to buy the company and there has been all of this back and forth over whether or not he has secured funding to do that. bloomberg news reported there is a criminal probe of these tweets. we re: new the fcc was looking already knewwe the fcc was looking into this. is a lot of risk for tesla.

some interesting reads the magazine this week. one was about toyota and their ambivalence on the future of self driving. toyota is viewed by some as in last place in this driver list -- driverless ca contestr. the story in business week this week looks at the strategy behind this. toyota is taking a contrarian bet, saying we don't think autonomous vehicles are going to happen as quickly as people think. the real benefit is to make our safer. -- cars safer. carol: we still have to figure out weather. max: there's a great story about

s, which could screw things up if they get in the way up the car. and snow is very difficult for conventional sensors in a driverless car to pick up. if there is a whiteout, you could get lost -- it'd be easier for a computer. jason: the technology is lazers instead of radar. light bounces all over the place and the car gets confused. max: snow is very problematic for lasers. there are other sensors that go into driverless cars, including radar, cameras, and also futuristic stuff. scans the bottom of the road to try to locate the car. carol: this is technology archaeologists in the military already use.

-- and the military already use. putting thise is together. you have all of these inputs and the car has to put these together and make a decision. you can imagine a world where it becomes get another input for driverless cars. the problems are all of these things added up together. jason: max just talked about some problems facing driverless car technology. the driverless car of the future cannot handle more than a dusting of snow. thelters the traction of car and how its cameras perceive the road. problem ins a known the field and a little bit embarrassing. even the best autonomous driving technology is still struggling

to navigate bad weather. the robots have a much more difficult time. foggs like snow or rain or cause issues with cameras or the laser-based sensor, partly because it can cover lane markings, which a thomas ous vehiclesautonom rely on and can use it to create a map of the subterranean area and use it to navigate the lidar. in concert with jason: that sounds really cool, but i don't quite get what you are talking about. how do you avoid the person in front of you if the radar is looking down? positioning.ng by creating a map of the

subsurface and relying on it, you are impervious to things like snow or rain or fog. jason: how does this become onomousle to an auto bang d driver? lane andve over a create a map of that lane and use it to navigate the vehicle. hailing and commercial trucking can allow us to create maps of the largest metro markets in the u.s.. are not saying this will replace the other sensors on the self driving cars. this is meant to work with it. tarik: right. you need all of these independent layers of safety and security.

the public wants to trust something you would put your mother or children in. lidar in all of these challenging scenarios. jason: al gore believes it is not too late to do something about climate change and he believes investors can profit. gettingnd another issue more urgent, coming up. jason: this is "bloomberg businessweek." lidar and camera are essential parts of the solution, but insufficient right now in terms of building a product that can be used♪ product that can be used♪

jason: welcome back to "bloomberg businessweek." carol: you can find us online. jason: and our mobile app. carol: now to climate change and al gore. he's been an environmentalist for decades.

documentary, "an inconvenient truth," that the world to global warming. bloomberg sits down with the vice president and nobel peace prize winner to talk about climate change policy interesting less than the future of the planet. >> if there is so much money to be made in sustainable finance, why haven't more investors flocked to this? >> anytime there is a significant change, inertia is an obstacle. nature.because of human werty keyboard does not make any sense, but the transition to the new design has all of the keyboard

and software companies. change can be difficult, but once changes embraced, you feel the wind at your back. was just talking about what he is doing with sustainable investing. joel: he is all about the future. we need to have companies that benefit us tomorrow. protera, 100% electrical buses. he positions that company as something that can displace diesel buses that are already going out of business.

tot is where he is trying find highly disruptive thanks -- things that do better for the planet and invest. gore'swhat is al mindset? joel: we are 10 years passed "an inconvenient truth." thatthe highs and lows of period, he is thinking, how can we actually affect change? is not going to let go of this fight. carol: does he think it is too late? joel: not at all. he says it is so easy to be alphabetical. -- apathetical. but he says you have a moral responsibility not to let that happen. you should look at where your

money goes. that is the only way you can really affect change. carol: what would you tell your younger self about what you've learned? joel: he has a great respect for the role business can play. a publicly elected official who looks at the business community and says, this is where change .an come from a public official who was figured it out. -- has figured it out. jason: we have a team at bloomberg dedicated to see sweet -- c-suite. tell us about these remarks. the old ceo of pepsi is

going to be transitioning out, someone who was not white and not a man. now it there is this massive competition in c-suite, all-male and white. this story is covered in the u.s. edition of the magazine. let's go to jordan. despite this diversity commitment by companies, we still have a c-suite that is predominately white and men. jordyn: with the departure of s aree ceos, c-suite getting more male and white. we are seeing diversity more at the entry-level. we looked at what was happening. jason: this is a stark disparity.

we hear this all the time, about inclusion efforts. when these female ceos leave their jobs, the impact this had on the numbers alone, much less the perception, was incredible. we have three black ceos and 24 female ceos, a 25% drop in the past year. these companies are not following through with the black and latino women in terms of new hires they are having. that is because people -- sally lays it out like it is in the story. she says, just do it. there has been so many programs companies say they will do, yet here we are.

rdyn: some companies are like, we are going to just do it. citigroup says they are going to increase the number of black managers in their management ranks, and women. do a conference every year for the black and latino new hires and say, this is how you get promoted. carol: your story talks about interns and new hires. but there is something deeper we have to get back to fix this problem. dyn: those relational factors. you have to make someone feel like they want to come to work every day. we are talking about white-collar jobs, decidingnals, the factor will be if someone stays at a company or looks elsewhere. jason: you work on a team

devoted to all of this. are you more optimistic after doing this story? rdyn: when looking at the numbers, it was hard to feel more optimistic. in we are going to check with interns in a few years and see if these new programs make people want to stay. carol: how brexit became neglected, coming up. jason: into cities are seeing massive growth, but what about the villages people are leaving growth, but what about the villages people are leaving behind? carol: this is "bloomberg businessweek." ♪ is "bloomberg businessweek." ♪

carol: welcome back to "bloomberg businessweek." jason: you can also listen to what's on the radio on sirius xm, in new york, boston, washington dc -- >> and in the bay area and

london. jason: i love private equity. to sit down a treat with one of the big executives in that world. sit at the nexus of investment and commerce to get insights into companies no one else gets. carlyle groupthe talk to me about the world of investments. -- talked to me about the world of investments. >> public companies are around half of what they used to be from 20 years ago. we are seeing companies that don't want to go public. there is so much more advantage to working with private equity in terms of long-term growth and value creation of what we can do to help ease companies drive value. we are seeing a tremendous shift in terms of the desire to partner with private equity. you are seeing growth in

different asset classes, infrastructure, private credit, which is growing at twice the rate of either equity. we are seeing the role of public versus private capital at play. you will continue to see the emergence of private capital at the expense of public capital. do with the money and all the value we bring to our companies is going to drive what we produce in the future. carol: this is a pretty big week u.k. officials meeting in salzburg to try and make progress on a deal, with no luck. sides failed to come up with a deal to break the deadlock. our reporter points out all of this single-minded focus on brexit across u.k. has led the government to stop working. lexit."ls it "neg

>> we are completely obsessed with brexit in the u.k. people outside of the u.k. don't think about it that much. it's become such a big deal much. it's become such a big deal here. one lawmaker point of this phrase -- cointed this phrase because of the political turmoil it is constant questions about whether theresa may will be the prime minister next week, whether we are going to have a hard or soft brexit, the fact she has this minority government, which means she struggles to get anything done in parliament that is controversial. carol: what are some domestic policy issues that are not being tackled, and foreign-policy issues? >> one of the things we looked at was a big issue in the united

states at the moment, flooding. floods beforee the brexit referendum kicked off in the north of england. at the timeor promised millions of pounds to people up there. this has not been delivered. that money has been allocated but it hasn't been spent. people far away from london are becoming increasingly frustrated. of these people are the kind of people that voted for brexit, because many of them felt frustrated at the way their lives were going and the policies the government had. are feeling more removed than ever before from westminster. from a foreign-policy perspective as well, it feels like the government is so internally focused, as well as from a citizenry perspective.

members of parliament cannot really content with much of anything, especially things beyond the border. the government is focused on securing a trade deal with the hopefullynion, and trade deals with other countries after we leave the european union next year. we have to understand how civil services work in government -- civil servants working government. things- bright young will have innovative opportunities to make names for themselves in the civil service. that is how ministers become prime ministers. but these people just get brushed aside and say, we are so busy focused on brexit -- focusing on brexit.

they are not thinking of anything innovative, apart from how to solve this conundrum. jason: there are thousands of villages that risk becoming ghost towns. carol: better jobs and modern lifestyles lure people to cities around the world. we see remote villages they are leaving behind. jason: a few are turning ntondoned buildings i towns with hospitality hubs. carol: we got more from our editor. this whole idea of living like a local when you travel has become big business. are falling into disrepair and becoming ghost towns. few entrepreneurs have decided to start turning these towns

into hotels, everything from churches to staples to hotel rooms. -- stables to hotel rooms. jason: can you live up to this standard? >>-- there is a term in italy. of these places threat italy. i have stayed in one of these town-hotels, very cool places. b&b to do we have air thank for this? people are looking for more authentic experiences when they travel. >> you are living the way people in that town live. they got that idea through the company. people don't expect to have all these services when they travel, they expect to just be living like a town person -- townsp erson. carol: some of these towns are

almost dying. no one is living there. when people went to live in the city is, the way of life -- cities, the way of life left behind would be agriculture-based. that is not the way it is anymore. whole towns are up for sale. these entrepreneurs are re-creating infrastructure in the town. bloomberg businessweek is available on newsstands. jason: and on our mobile app. carol: what was your favorite story this week? jason: jay powell is a different sort of fed chair. he has -- he knows his way around washington. we know the gender gap that is out there when it comes to salaries and opportunities.

it discouraging bed when it comes to stock option grants, women aren't -- that's when it comes to stock option grants, women are just not getting the same as men. jason: more bloomberg tv starts now. ♪

emily: i am emily chang and this is "best of bloomberg technology " where we bring you all of our best interviews this week in technology. we speak exclusively to the ceo on the outfitter's newest friend. and building to be the world's largest payment network. thanacing more disruption ever, arthur kelly lays out