jonathan: from new york city for our viewers worldwide, i'm jonathan ferro with 30 minutes dedicated to fixed income. this is "bloomberg real yield." coming up, the federal reserve is not returning to read a fourth rate hike in december. even as global growth concerns are increasing, fueling a bit es andid into treasuri crude oil falling into a bear market. we begin with of the big issue, the fed staying the course. >> i would expect to the fed's -- i would expect the fed's projection of gradual increases in the target funds rate to stay

on track. >> the economy is cooking, baby. you have fiscal policy going on, the lowest unemployment rate since the 1960's and the economy is doing nicely. he is tightening policy. nobody in the world is because their economies are getting crushed like bugs. >> there is no reason to keep tightening up this pace, especially since we're doing it twofold. i think one of that has to slow down. of hikingterms or the balance sheet. >> slow down? it should be reversed. give me a break. four rate rises of a quarter-point per year? that's 1%. they started in 2015. >> if they start to see the curve inverted or really flatten toward zero, i think they are going to back away. i do not think they will play chicken with the market. jonathan: joining me around the table here in new york city is henry peabody, mary bowers. a portfoliondon,

manager at algebras investments. i will begin with you to see if you disagree with your colleague. mary: we are thinking the fed will remain on pace with the rate hikes. the one thing from a high-yield perspective -- i have been fairly cautiously optimistic on high yields from the fundamentals perspective. we were a little more cautious this summer from the valuation perspective. we repriced 50 basis points in october, but we are starting to see concerning things by the -- bubbling from bottom up in terms of supply chain disruption and cost increases while top line is starting to slow. it feels like putting plugs in the portfolio. the sector seems to have issues. that is keeping us, despite the repricing, concerned. now more from the fundamentals perspective. henry: i think it is spot on. aboutthink a little

stimulation risks being to the upside and we are still quite stimulative on the front end. we are talking about moving up to neutral, 3%. we have a ways to go. what happens if wage inflation pushes into the high threes and productivity stays around 1%? then all of a sudden you have even more expansionary policy. the yawning deficit at this point in the cycle is something to pay very close attention to. so the fed has its work cut out for it. especially with a leverage the economy and having to walk that line. it is a tough gig. jonathan: it is a really tough gig, but i thought it was interesting in their statement they barely acknowledged anything that happened the past two months. what did you make of that? henry: i think they are trying to overlook the volatility of the market. i think the fed knows there is little dry powder left if there is another slow down in the next three to five years. and they have to build a policy buffer. the fiscal policy ammunition will be limited because it is youth already late in the cycle.

so they want to increase the potential for tightening -- sorry, for loosening policy in a slow down. having said that, if you strip out the cost of housing from inflation, inflation is growing, but growth is still relatively muted. we do not have the pass-through you had in a normal recovery between low unemployment and inflation. you could see if the next year the momentum of the fiscal stimulus fades, he you could see the fed looking at itself and maybe saying we hiked too much. , we are far from that moment. henry: building on what was said, early october we have the powell comment about being a far , along with from neutral. jonathan: we do not know what neutral is, but we are a long way from it. henry: we are building and a little bit of buffer and it adds to the fragility in equity markets. markets and credit. markets. they said they will not bailout

bad positioning. jonathan: perhaps they should not. most people in this program will also can smooth -- conclude that they should not. if you look outside, doggedly looking at unemployment and inflation, there are often things turning on in this economy beyond what many would consider lagging indicators. are there things you need to be focusing on now? mary: where we are seeing it is autos, auto parts. obviously homeowners have been underperforming sectors. in october, wilson saw -- we also saw the basics start a selloff even more. so we are seeing cost pressures and supply chain disruption, everything we still have uncertainty around where the next wave of tariffs might come. are we going to reach an agreement? that still seems a way off from our perspective. jonathan: it is not about having a conversation week after week on programs like this about what the federal reserve should and should not do. it is what they will do.

and they are communicating pretty clearly to us at the moment, they are going to carry on hiking, aren't they? the conclusion is they will carry on hiking until something breaks. alberto: yes, this is the worry. you carry on hiking, but at the same time, structurally the economy globally has been more fragile. the has been more leveraging in the corporate balance sheets. markets have been one way for 10 years. there is more liquidity mismatches. and regulators have been focusing a lot on banks, which is where the channels of contagion were for the last crisis. they are not necessarily the issues that are potentially going to be affected in the next crisis. you know, the next crisis could be about higher real yields, the lack of liquidity in markets, high-yield balance sheets and so on. so it could look like they are overdoing it, especially for emerging markets and other economies that are dependent on

dollar funding next year. henry: i think the dollar funding issue is a real one. we saw a shift in late september when that became more of an issue. and let's think now about technicals out next year. we could see capital flowing from the u.s. back to europe . if you see a shift in the ecb policy, there could be a bit of a sucking sound into europe now that they have been priced out. so i think that is a technical aspect that a lot of people are not talking about. jonathan: let's talk about fundamentals. icd celebration and -- i see deceleration and growth across europe. i see it more clearly this week in china as well. how do you get the sucking sound when the momentum is not there in the united states? henry: everyone has been looking for china to slow and push as -- and china is doing everything they can in their power to avoid a rate cut and push as much as they can. but we have to think about second derivatives here.

we have had a push towards the deflationary mindset for a long time. it takes a lot to dislodge that. even if the ecb pushes up rates 25 basis points in q3 recaps the , italian banks to a degree, brings him back into their camp, that is a big change in risk attitude over there. so i do not think it takes a lot to shift from a zero to actually flows returning. outflows,if you get where from? where is moldable on the treasury curve for you, the way things are priced? henry: you saw that auction on tuesday, it was a really ugly auction. today, but the treasury curve -- the high-quality debt space, whether it is u.s. high grade or treasuries, that seems vulnerable to us, between supply, refinancing, correlations, the fact that japan and china, the two largest buyers of treasuries, are starting to get along better. that is business school 101.

that is something to pay very close attention to. jonathan: mary? seen all your, we have not that bid from overseas that has really fueled inflows over this credit cycle. a lot of it is the dollar cost of hedging. high-yield at euro hedge backing the dollars, it is almost doing better at this point, considering that we do not have some of the same bottom-up issues maybe from a sector perspective. so that is a risk and i think that is a risk, like you said, for investment grade and high-yield. jonathan: i want to put that question to someone in london. will we get that talking sound, those outflows through 2019? alberto, from where you're sitting what does it look like? the emerging markets in the u.s., there have been some outflows, but the area which really has suffered this year has been europe, which is -- last year with the

french elections, president of grahn the dream of a united europe. this year, with the italian coalition, we have come back to the opposite extreme. the pendulum has swung towards europe breakup fears again. we think the market is now priced for extreme fear risk. it is priced for if aliens go back to invade earth, first thing they do, they will attack europe and the european banks. 2016,re are the loans of the record high in spread premium between high-yield bonds in europe and u.s. held bonds for the same rating since 2010. here, you have to think about the european side has been a lot slower. companies are still to leveraging. deleveraging, and you are getting pretty high spreads for medium or good-quality high-yield companies. if you don't have a recession, which is really what the market

is telling you is going to happen, if you do not have a hard brexit, if you kick the can you get paid very well. andre talking about 6% 7% yields in euros. you been have increasing exposure to italian bank credit over the past few months? alberto: we have produced some european exposure in q1, and after the summer we have been buying. italy obviously has long-term issues, but you have the same ineads, the same returns spain and the u.k. as well. you have barclays debt trading wider in latin american countries, which have elections and a very unsustainable debt burden to give you the idea. there is an extreme premium, and that's potentially an opportunity. if you look at emerging markets in the u.s., valuations are not

as wide as in europe. jonathan: guys, right to have you -- great to have you with me henry peabody,, and mary bowers. --cex is set to trade a change its $750 million leverage loan. this is bloomberg. ♪

jonathan: i am jonathan ferro. this is "bloomberg real yield." i want to head to the auction block now, where we start with more issuance from the u.s. treasury. a ton of issuance this week, but the one that made a lot of news was the $19 billion of 30 year bonds with a ratio that it does

-- a bid to cover ratio that hit the lowest level since 2009. it was awarded 3.42% above the bidding rate. paste corporate side, this wednesday investment-grade bar was posted, the biggest supply total since early october. volkswagen led the way within a billion dollar, seven part deal, just shy of $60 billion. and in leveraged loans, spacex is planning to launch a $750 million loan, which will now be led by bank of america. aldman recently led talks on smaller $500 million financing. still with me to discuss these issues is henry peabody, mary bowers, and alberto gallo from algebris. mary, many people might have missed it. especially if you are outside of fixed income. for leveraged loans, it was the busiest month since may of october. that was october, where everyone was going crazy, and october was

still that busy. how? mary: they posted a small positive return in october. it outperform much of fixed income this year. clo demand has been enormous. we had over $100 billion of clo issuance and it is sucking the newest supply yield out. best new issued supply out of high-yield, which we have talked about in the past. the technical for high-yield has been pretty good, despite the markets.we had for the for now, it seems like the leveraged loan space is still going to be able to print a lot of new issuance. jonathan: is that attractive for you? henry: we think it is getting a little frothy, frankly. it is not just the terms. it is what is discussed around covenant light. we are seeing very top-heavy secured cap structures, and what ends up happening in the next a road tohas been recovery values that have

typically been pretty high for leveraged loans. we had beentime, saying throughout the year that the fundamentals look pretty good for credit, and while we have seen some choppiness in the third quarter, i would say that we are rolling over. it is certainly getting late in that cycle and we are seeing some speculative issuance. jonathan: on the leverage loan side of things, how is this attractive? from a floating rate perspective or a credit perspective? henry: we have a number of strategies that are focused on loans to our strategies, which are very much focused on total return. the attraction is the floating rate component, the secured component. those are the textbook assets to it. let's look at the combined high-yield loan market as a whole. the composition of that market is changing dramatically. we are doing top-heavy capital structures, have more in the second lien space. groups ande clo

retail involved. some of the attraction is everything else is expensive. it is very easy to go and comfortable to go someplace with a floating rate aspect to it. what happens when something become less -- something becomes less expensive, or the yield selloff and the flows reverse? i would leave that as an open question. liquidity, we will see how the market responds and how we can absorb that liquidity. and how much liquidity is in the leveraged loan space. alberto, how would you manage exposure? alberto: we think there are more attractive parts of the market. asset classes have done really well this year. like you said earlier, if you have a repricing of yields across short-term interest rates from the fed, longer-term interest rates going up in real terms, other asset classes will be attractive.

interesting point is that a lot of investors think leveraged loans are good because they have a floating rate component. however, from a credit point of view, some companies will get hurt by higher financing cost. if rates go up, you do not have the duration component. but you could have higher refinancing costs for companies, which can get hurt from their balance sheet weakness. it is not immune from an increase in real yields. jonathan: a straightforward point, but uninformed one. borrowing costs are going up. mary: borrowing costs are going up, and where we are seeing some of the m&a froth coming into the pre-leveragedm lbo's. but that is something to keep in mind, particularly for top-heavy cap structures.

where you have a high-yield bond, a fixed-rate bond, and as credit improves, it can requalify had lower rate. you have a tough heavy capital structure with a lot of floating rate debt, as your debt moves higher, your cost is moving higher at the same time. when we look at our own positioning, we are very mindful of some of these top-heavy security cap structures. jonathan: guys, you're staying with me. let's get you a market check on where bonds have been this week. to's, tense, and 30's, yields shaping up as follows. of of the front-end by two basis points, but a bit into the 30 year, even with that ugly auction this week, 3.40 on a u.s. 30 year. the week ahead, featuring a fresh read on u.s. inflation and comments from both draghi and powell. this is "bloomberg real yield." ♪

jonathan: i am jonathan ferro. this is "bloomberg real yield." it's time now for the final spread. coming up over the next week, we will have speeches from jay powell and mario draghi. plus, we have an opec meeting, key economic data from the united states and china, and italy will show its new 2019 budget to the european union. a reminder, the u.s. bond market is closed monday for veterans day. still with me to discuss is henry peabody from eaton vance, mary bowers from hsbc global asset management, and alberto gallo. mary, we have to get you on the oil market. within opec meeting through -- with an opec meeting through the weekend and we see a big move lower in crude, can high-yield stay as resilient as it has done? mary: what we see now through the workings of the oil market and the high-yield cycle, we saw

the -- cycle in high-yield. that flushed out a lot of the lowest credit quality in energy. yes, what we have left are a couple of bad actors, but by and large, the credit quality is much higher and they can extend lower -- they can withstand lower prices of oil. jonathan: henry, is that your stress test? henry: you washed out a good deal of the market. on oil, one of the interesting things about it is this iranian situation and how trump has given out to several nations ahead of the midterms. i think he knew he could not have $3.75 gas going into the midterms. he has a year or so before he needs to worry about his reelection. and he can actually put the boot to iran a little bit more. so watch for higher prices. he actually has the ability to do this now. jonathan: you are a bit more constructive on crude, do you higher into be

high-yield." henry: no, i do not think you need the crude story -- high-yield? henry: no, i do not think you need the crude story for high-yield. it is a technical story. watch for those technicals to potentially unwind and give you an opportunity to buy duration and have them improve into their balance sheets, which they cannot do in the loan market. jonathan: that is a good point. you know how we and the program, you get into the boxes and we ask you quick questions of the rapidfire round, we are going to do that now. we want to get to the federal reserve. a lot of people wondering where rates will peak. more than three or less than three? henry, more or less? henry: more. mary: more. alberto: more. jonathan: the 30 year through the week, yields are lower. some people out there might be considering to add duration. is this a time to increase duration, yes or no? henry? henry: no, not in the least bit. mary: no, no yet. alberto: not yet. jonathan: getting a consensus from you guys.

final question. have a feel for where this is going as well. will be oil rout catch-up with high yields? yes or no? henry: high yield is going to be softer, but not because of oil. mary: agree, yes. jonathan: alberto? alberto: i think high-yield is weaker, but not too weak. jonathan: a clear consensus, guys. i will work better next week. great to catch up with you, henry peabody, mary bowers and a gallo from algebris. we will see you next friday at the same time, 1:00 p.m. new york, 6:00 london. this was "bloomberg real yield." this is bloomberg tv. ♪ [ phone rings ] what?!

ready for christmas? no, it's way too early to be annoyed by christmas. you just need some holiday spirit! that's it! this feud just went mobile. with xfinity xfi you get the best wifi experience at home. and with xfinity mobile, you get the best wireless coverage for your phone. ...you're about to find out! you don't even know where i live... hello! see the grinch in theaters by saying "get grinch tickets" into your xfinity x1 voice remote. a guy just dropped this off. he-he-he-he.

carol: welcome to bloomberg businessweek. jason: we're here in new york. carol: bloomberg businessweek is releasing its 30th annual ranking of the best schools in the united states. stick around for the winner. jason: the search for serious returns in the decade since the financial crisis.