♪ up on "bloomberg best," the stories that shaped the week in business around the world. , threatsks get testy router markets as the u.s. and china tried to deal. was inhave a market that position for a complete breakdown in trade talks. >> they broke the deal. >> i would rather not do a deal than a bad deal. >> reports rolling in, another gloomy forecast. occidental in a bidding war for anadarko. a publicly traded company. wall street movers and shakers

way in in las vegas. >> there are so many investors desperate for yield right now. >> we want to ask those investors what corporate governance should or should not be. >> an economy full of question marks, policy moves are not the answer. >> i am not inclined to lower the fed funds rate. >> we think the u.s. economy and monetary policy is in a good place. >> it is all straight ahead on "bloomberg best." ♪ >> hello and welcome. youris "bloomberg best," weekly review of analysis and interviews from bloomberg television around the world. let's look at the top headlines. investors had high hopes that

the u.s. and china were moving towards a deal, but tweets from president trump dampened the optimism. uppresident trump ramping pressure to finalize a trade deal this week. he is threatening to double tariffs on $200 billion of chinese goods to the u.s. and impose new taxes. >> it is a shift in town. they have been sounding they could be close to a deal with china. there are two big things. administration officials are concerned china might team backpedaling on its agreements. the other is politics, president trump is facing pressure from hawks who want him to keep pressing to really push china, and that seems to be happening. between china and the

u.s. are in jeopardy after beijing hits back at president trump's threat. sources saying china is considering canceling trade negotiations due to begin in washington wednesday. saide chinese have always they will not negotiate at knife point. there will be a lot of voices in beijing saying trump tweeting he will raise tariffs is a knife point. >> the latest threat is twofold, to increase existing tariffs, and to secondly broaden the tariffs to blanket all goods from china. it is starting to hurt consumer sentiment, spending. if the threats were pushed through, then economists say you're looking at a change in sentiment and global growth. >> the trump administration says it will raise tariffs on chinese goods on friday, accusing

beijing of backpedaling on commitments made during trade talks. what did the treasury department say? >> they said there had been a clear turnaround in the chinese position. they had seeing the chinese really try to ne renegotiate positions. therade talks continue as feist premier is set to visit washington may 9 and may 10. >> there could be a few raised eyebrows that the vice premier is still getting on the plane despite the threat. the chinese side have said they won't negotiate with a gun to their head. that is what they are doing at the moment. what is key is whether the feist premier is going to washington with anything to say. he may stall and he may have

something new in his bag. , tech dow down 600 points and industrials leading losses. >> it has been ugly, relentless. >> most people are in the camp we will get some deal. that expectation is eroding by the hour. >> president trump saying china is coming to the u.s. to make a trade deal. meanwhile, the delegation arrives with reports they could retaliate if the u.s. does impose higher tariffs. what changed this morning? trump's tweet with before the markets open. thatnounced on sunday tariffs would be escalated as of this friday on china, so trump had a happy tweet saying they are coming here. he railed against the trade

deficit and introduce the idea china might be stalling because they might see themselves getting a better deal with democrats. democrats michael weaker if they keep these talks going on to the presidential election. president trump upping the rhetoric, seining china broke the deal they were negotiating. you see the tariffs -- >> you see the tariffs? they broke the deal. >> when he talks about china preaching to deal, what is he talking about? >> he had a hint today from the foreign ministry and the global times. they made the point that the u.s. and china can work together on this, but also the global times made it clear that china is bracing for a fight, even if talks continue. >> china has said there have been very's commitments made and

china honors its word and that has been for change. that is all we are hearing from the chinese ahead of the talks. >> the s&p 500 breaking below the 50 day moving average. it looks like there is no place to hide. >> you have a market that was in position for a complete breakdown in trade talks. they weren't position for the escalation of a trade war, for the possibility we will add 15 percentage points to those tariffs. >> i did get last night a beautiful letter from president xi jinping. let's work together. let's see if we can get something done. but they renegotiated the deal. they took intellectual property theft, many, many parts of that deal and renegotiated it. you can't do that. >> we have come off the lows quite a bit. it looks like we will close

closer to the highs of the session. the s&p is down for a fourth straight day. >> the reality is the market was not pricing in a good deal at the beginning of this year and a lot of the rally had priced in a pretty good deal between the u.s. and china, so the surprise this week has continued to increase the level of uncertainty investors had in what was a bullish market signal. .> let's talk uber it sold 180 million shares for $45 a piece, $8.1 billion. a violationves uber of $75.5 billion, just below its last private market value of $76 billion. 10r's listing is among the largest ipos of all time and the biggest on the u.s. exchange since 2014.

they are more cautious. is it because of the trade war and concerns on the market, or they think they don't want to repeat -- >> they are looking at lyft, which went on in the middle to top end of the range and has subsequently seen its value followed by 20%. that is a concern if you are an uber investor. >> we have our first trade. $42.20. >> that a 6% below the ipo price. that is a huge gap down. to digest.large ipo you're talking about an $8 billion ipo. it will take investors time to make up their minds. ♪ >> overnight, new tariffs on chinese imports. resident trump tweets this morning that he is in no rush to

come to an agreement. overnight we also heard from the chinese government that they are considering countermeasures. >> we didn't get any details on the retaliation, other than being told to stay tuned. we have seen this and previous tariff spats where china promised immediate retaliation. perhaps a view that they are waiting to see how the talks go in washington today. doesn't sound like a deal is imminent. china is probably lining up the retaliation to have ready to go. >> negotiators ramping up their talks without a deal. the treasury secretary said it was constructed, no deal, but no breakdown. what is the mood in washington? music,e is public mood then there is than the music inside the negotiating room and

the u.s. trade representative's office. we were told that these negotiations basically got nowhere over the last two days. the only thing we have ended up u.s.is a threat from the side for more tariffs and the next three to four weeks on chinese goods. tranche, ifllion the chinese don't bend, we have no end to the trade wars, certainly not today in washington. ♪ , an exclusive conversation with jamie dimon about what is at stake for both economies and the u.s.-china trade negotiations. plus, we discuss the next potential downturn. richard clarida and robert kaplan. up next, highlights from a busy week of earnings reports. >> the first quarter salt tailwinds as opposed to headwinds. >> we had no assets that did not make a contribution to the

bottom line. >> it has turned from a nightmare to reality. >> this is bloomberg. ♪

♪ >> this is "bloomberg best." earnings and focus this week. our roundup starts with commerzbank. commerzbank net estimates. it added customers, better results for net interest income. the numbers should give a boost after the breakdown of merger talks with deutsche bank. difficult,ronment is as it has been for the last five years. expect forward, we don't

it to get easier. >> you have negative rates to contend with. how long does that happen? is this a permanent situation? >> it has turned from a nightmare to just reality. what was said about rates going up and down for the upcoming years, i think there is little to no believe that we will see rates rising in the next two years at least. >> walt disney rose in late trade after earnings beat estimates. profits fell 13% in the second quarter. analysts were expecting a deeper drop after the move into digital streaming. what truth a good result? >> theme parks did well. espnable tv business with also did pretty well, better than expected. disneys always been what

has been able to pull off. it has these diversified businesses. if one thing is not doing well, another picks up. shares fell after a quick pop. projectingiler is second-quarter revenue of $810 million, exceeding $782 million forecast. lyft also reported an eye-popping net loss of more than $1 billion in the march period, more than it has lost in all of 2018. what stood out to you? >> the company is losing an extraordinarily large amount of money. even on the call with investors, they said they see themselves on a path to profitability. i have a hard time seeing it. they lost nine dollars per share and the stock is $60.

is that a stock you want to own? lossunds like an awful big for a company trying to get its feet on the ground is a public company. softbank's uber that pays off. gain on a super juicy others. a loss when it comes to nvidia. not everything was perfect for them. >> it is a giant fund in terms of growth. the vision fund was $100 billion. he noted they are going to market for a second vision fund. these earnings and profit and figures could help in terms of investor attraction for that. largest lindner says it is seeing and improving environment after better-than-expected first-quarter results. >> the first quarter salt tailwinds as opposed to

headwinds. on top of that, the fact that most central banks have backed off of monetary tightening, in some case easing monetary policy. that is always helpful to global economic conditions. i think the, environment is clearly better than it was a few months ago. range ofc targeting a eightcuts after profit drop of 20% last year. hitooks like westpac was hard by this misconduct costs. westpac,n't pretty for a $617 million charge. what nationalhan australia bank had flagged before they reported. as you said, 22% drop in cash profit for westpac because of weaker business conditions, the

remediation costs, and the findings handed down earlier this year. earnings beat estimates for the first quarter, the first since the merger. the big headline was the asset sale, $1.5 billion next year. what you selling? >> non-core assets, assets better in other people's hands. a solid quarter, apart from those going to closure, those assets performed in line with plan. we had no assets that did not make a contribution to the bottom line. we want to focus on to your one interior to assets. particularlydon't fit in our strategic focus. we will put them in other people's hands. >> bmw's first-quarter profit

slumped as the carmaker's setting aside more money for potential fines. it revised and antitrust division 21.4 billion euros. it is being investigated falling allegations it colluded to delay the rollout of clean emission cars. >> the profit if you look at the numbers today look to bad. the first automotive profit loss since 2009. if you take out the 1.4 billion euros you mentioned, profit is still lower than last year by 42%. that brings the group profit down 27%. there are a lot of factors at play. trade tensions and things like that, but bmw is in the middle of a model refresh. until that happens, profit is not hitting the level they hoped it would. >> the u.s.-china trade spat is hurting japanese automakers with toyota and honda forecasting

below estimates. i want to get to your key takeaways. is howota foretell profitable their china businesses. they also make quite a lot of money in japan through lexus and royalties. honda, the numbers were somewhat disappointing, coming primarily from the motorcycle business come away there has been a slow down in the indian market. when we look at the two wheeler business, they are gaining share globally, but there is pressure on sales in emerging markets. that was perhaps the weakest area of their earnings. ♪

♪ to "bloombergk best." on wednesday, bloomberg set down with jamie dimon at the global china summit in beijing. -china trade talks were about to resume and jamie dimon was blunt. >> what ever the odds were before, it is still 80% to get it done, the odds of something bad has now doubled. what ever they were before has stumbled. that is why the markets are reacting. they are not afraid of the direct effect. , itreverse of global trade

can slow down global growth and hurt economies around the world. >> the imf is projecting global growth at the slowest pace since the global financial crisis, with a china deal. is it as dire as that am a worse than that? >> the world economy is doing ok. 6.5%, $1growing trillion in growth. america is almost 3%. they have slowed down, but it is still active. the fly in the ointment would be that if this goes south, it could change global growth. >> do you feel talks are getting louder voice -- hawks are getting a lot of voice in the white house, even as there is pushed back to the comments from donald trump. do you hang tough or du haggle for a less than ideal deal? >> both sides should do what is

in their best interest. , there are yeah serious issues that need to be resolved. i think they have made a lot of progress doing that. it is good for the chinese and americans. neither side has to do something. it is an error to say because we are doing better -- just get the proper trade deal done. it may take some time to do a proper trade deal. i would rather not do a deal been do a bad deal. idea forhat is of that i d american china. i think we would like to see proper trade deal done between china and america, then they can support it. can they overcome getting a verifiable timetable for implementation of their pledges and a reversing of the forced technology transfers and other big issues on intellectual property? >> i don't think there is anything that can't be resolved.

china has opened up a lot of industries. they have been doing that anyway. need reform and their own markets for bond markets and equity markets, transparency, rule of law. i don't expect the chinese to do anything in our interest. i think these things are in their own self-interest. so while you don't want unfair competition, let's not blow it completely out of proportion. a country like china is allowed to have industrial policy. let them work it out. was jamie speaking exclusively in beijing on wednesday. more compelling conversations coming up on "bloomberg best," including the ceo of uber on the day of the company's ipo. next, exclusive insight from steve eisman. he says at some point there will be another recession and he

explains where it will hit the hardest. causeporate debt will not the next recession. it is where the pain will be in the next recession, a subtle difference. >> this is bloomberg. ♪

♪ >> this is "bloomberg best." haschair jerome powell given policy for the foreseeable future, but investors still have questions about the inflation outlook, and what kind of data could spur the fomc to hike or cut rates. this week, top fed officials added perspective on bloomberg television. let's start with the bank of dallas president robert kaplan, who told kathleen hays about the difference he sees between transitory and structural inflation in the u.s. economy. ♪ >> the part that is muting inflation is the structural part

of inflation, not the cyclical, the structural. what i mean by that, technology enabled this disruption, to some extent globalization. businesses don't have pricing power. the consumer has in the palm of his or her hand enormous computing power, more than most companies 15 years ago. and when a business has a cost increase today, it is likely it will erode their margins and they won't be able to pass it on. that is muting inflation. >> when will you get worried about this inflation? >> the reason i highlight the structural issue, and i have been talking about this for meansyears, for me it inflation is not running away from us. it also in my view is not as susceptible to monetary policy. we used to take that into account. we just got talking about corporate debt.

i think we are just going to have to monitor this very carefully. i am not inclined at this point to lower the fed funds rate to address it, and i'm not sure lowering the fed funds rate -- that is more effective dealing with the cyclical elements of inflation. i'm less convinced it deals with the structural elements, so i am still of the view -- i could change my mind, but for the time being, i would stand past. ♪ >> the economy is in a good place. we had a strong first quarter looking throughout the rest of the year. the fed views economic growth this year as coming in around 2%, perhaps a little bit above that depending on where the data breaks. in terms of inflation, inflation has been running on the soft side recently. we think there are some temporary factors to at least some of that. our baseline view is that inflation will begin to move up toward the 2% objective, but we

are certainly looking at the data closely. >> markets seem confident that 2.5% is now a terminal rate, correct? >> well, again, that is one view, and the data can break either way and surprise on the upside or the downside. what i would say is that we think the u.s. economy and monetary policy is in a good place right now. our focus is in sustaining maximum employment and price stability. we don't see a strong case to move rates in either direction, but of course as data comes in we will always be looking for indications on that. ♪ markets broadcial concerns this week, many top investors gathered in las vegas. erik schatzker spoke exclusively with some of the most prominent attendees, including billionaire real estate market sam zell, who explained why he prefers active investing to passive. ♪ theory of passive

investing is that, when it's all you have noe, reason to believe that you can do better than the average. the etf approach or the passive approach is to try and replicate average. all of which is fine. >> what's your specific concern? >> but until, all of a sudden, all these passive energies started adopting corporate governance criteria, which is hardly a class act -- >> so corporate governance is an active approach. >> without question. >> so you think there's a discontinuity or conflict, if you will, between active corporate governments and passive ownership. thate of the reasons being they pay dividends, and have a

disproportionate ownership by passive investors. i don't know the answer but i wouldn't be surprised if 15%, 18% of all of us had our own passive investors. do we want to ask those passive investors what corporate governance should or shouldn't be? do we want people who are investing solely to do as well as everybody else but not better passing judgment? >> so what do you want the blackrock's and vanguard's and other index managers to do? >> i think they should do exactly what they say they are. they should be passive. i think they should vote the same way as the majority of the shareholders. this is not a management issue at all. this is strictly -- >> in other words, let the

active investors speak -- >> let the active investors speak. i'm a passive investor, i should go along with whatever is resolved. ♪ biggest week for issuance, new issuance, and months. what does it say to you that so much debt is coming to market? >> there's a lot of people in the market. there are so many different types of investors who were desperate for yield, and who went through a period in december where there was zero new issuance. rates are down. the fed said it was going to keep rates down, and rates globally are down. there's a contest with a lot of investable capital, looking for yield. issuers take advantage of that. >> there's not much yield in the investment-grade market. >> there's more in the investment-grade market in the u.s. than most u.s. markets -- most non-us markets. it allows issuers to push the boundaries of behavior in terms of what kind of covenants and protection they offer to

investors. >> that is certainly something you see in your corner of the credit market. one of the most recent features to emerge in the collateral -- excuse me, covenant world, is collateral light. the expressed opportunity or rights written into loan documents for sponsors, backers of leveraged buyout's, to be able to take collateral out from underneath the loan. >> there is how you behave insus other buy side people those fighting for the scraps of food on the table scratching each other. then you have these difficult issues like how cds is triggered. you get issuers that have much,ms, and they become much more aggressive and how they behave toward creditors, because they know they can because creditors need something to invest in, and there's another batch of them around the corner. those are sometimes pushing the limits, in my opinion, of

behavior that we might necessarily be involved in. however, when the market is willing to accept low covenants, to me that is established in limits of the playing field, and it makes the whole negotiation more interesting, not less interesting, and a time when there's a credit problem. ♪ insights more exclusive from a leading voice on wall street. steve eisman famously foresaw the collapse of the pridemore -- of the subprime mortgages before the crisis, chronicled in the book and movie "the big short." he joined us to share his thoughts on what he sees coming for markets. ♪ anything in the recesses of the financial industry which worries you? >> i don't. let me give you a statistic. precrisis, citigroup was leveraged 33-1. if you leveraged in the balance sheet, it was in excess of 40-1.

by 2016, it was 10-1. that's the difference from mercury to pluto. 2016, fory that by the first time in all the years i've covered financials, i can say the financial system of the united states is safe. that doesn't mean we won't have a recession, and i think there will be massive losses in the bond markets because of the lack of liquidity, but that will be the problem of the people investing in the bond markets. it's not a systemic problem. >> people don't really know what's going to hit that next when it comes to financial crises. >> i want to be very clear, there is not a financial crisis. in the recession, people will lose money, and where they will lose money will be in the bond markets, because they're so much less liquidity as part of the clear pricing. you will see big losses and things like triple b corporate debt, high yield, but you need a recession first. >

what wall street did precrisis caused the financial crisis. corporate debt is not going to cause the next recession, it is where the pain will be in the next recession. there's a subtle difference but it's an important point. ♪

♪ this is "bloomberg best." let's resume our global tour of the week's top business stories in europe, where a new economic -- contains more downbeat predictions for growth in the region. ♪ >> the european commission spring report came out a short time ago, in which it cut its german gdp forecast to .5%, trimmed its euro area gdp forecast to 1.2%, and said that risks from trade and brexit remain "pronounced." >> the forecast that they put shows that these

slowdowns are temporary. germany is expected to have a already nextcovery year from the low growth that is projected for 2019. takest act politically, decisions very quickly on issues that have been accumulating in the last one or two years , and we have certainly given the expectation for a better second semester. ♪ >> iran says it will no longer comply with some parts of the nuclear deal. it has given the other signatories to the agreement 60 days to fulfill their commitments. this is in response to the u.s. increasing economic pressure earlier this month when it let

oil sanctions expire. doesn't mean they will automatically go to uranium enrichment? >> not yet. iran is espousing a gradual policy. what they are doing now is stopping a couple things they've committed to as part of this agreement, and they are saying that what they want is for the europeans -- this is clearly aimed at the europeans, because americans have already left the agreement, saying that in the next 60 days, we want to see something from the europeans that shows us that it is worth staying in. then they said they will remove andlimits on enrichment, essentially the beginning of the end of the agreement. ♪ >> occidental has escalated the bidding war for anadarko, increasing the cash portion, bearing the burden of the $1 billion breakup for abandoning the deal with chevron.

this proposal comes just hours after occidental struck a deal to offload nearly $9 million. anadarko is still not saying we are in. how much further do they have to go to get this deal done? >> time around, 50-50, now 78% cash, giving them the right to bypass shareholder approval. and at the same time, they are bringing in total, bringing in billions of dollars of these african assets. it makes sense. >> anadarko petroleum has declared occidental's sweetened takeover superior, allowing chevron to either boost or walk away with one million-dollar breakup fees. >> anadarko's board has voted to move forward. we know that chevron and the ceo

are committed to staying on the message of discipline, but now i think we are seeing that nothing can be predicted. we have seen all sorts of twists and turns. ifis too early to say chevron will come back. >> chevron is taking a $1 billion breakup fee and will not raise their bid for anadarko, instead putting it in buybacks, seeing more value in buying back its own share than making another bid for anadarko. a win for chevron and for our shareholders. we came out of the deal with $1 billion, and we will return back to our shareholders of the higher buyback. winning in any environment doesn't mean winning at any cost. in the commodity business, costs and capital business always matter. it would have eroded value to our shareholder in diminished returns. this was a good opportunity but it wasn't a necessity for chevron, and we are not desperate to do a deal. we came out of this feeling very good. ♪ omaha overrging on

the weekend for berkshire hathaway's annual meeting. billionaire investor warren buffett found himself in an unusual position, answering questions about whether a change is needed after bets on amazon. we got news at the end of last week about amazon being a view, doesin your this represent some sort of drift from the berkshire style of investing, or are we just in a world where you couldn't possibly say that something inut amazon can arguably fit at berkshire? >> it's the letter. it's not a 20-year-old company. it is still doing interesting things, and jeff bezos is an innovative guy, but the track record is clear. those guys can now probably pattern those cash flows with a reasonable degree of certainty and form a judgment that they can pay less than it's worth. ♪ >> conflicting signals from the

bond market. it was the weakest demand in a decade for the 10 year option yesterday. then the corporate debt markets had the busiest week and eight months. another 19 million sale. what does this say? >> from the corporate side, they are looking at extraordinarily low yields, a chance to raise some capital. if you look at where they could do it now versus last year, just 12 months ago, it is radically lower from the financial side. i think i can see the motivation coming from the sectors to do that. on the demand side, you have investors also reeling from relatively low yields and high quality portfolios, trying to add a little more return. you can see where the demand is going away from the highest quality, in part because it just doesn't give u.s. much. that is what we are seeing on

both sides of the equation. ♪ bankerer goldman sachs -- has been extradited from malaysia to the united states to face charges thanks to the 1mdb state investment fund scandal. what's the outlook? >> this is the latest in the 1mdb case. he has already been arrested in malaysia and now that he's coming to the u.s., this gives the doj a lot more firepower. we have to remember that they -- we are still awaiting details, we are still trying to figure out what were the terms of the extradition, is there going to be bail, will they get him to plead guilty, but the bottom line is this is good for the doj and not for goldman. ♪ >> the turkish lira is falling against the dollar. highest electoral body nullifying the election results. let's put this in perspective, because there's a key level the

turkish lira fell below, pretty key to sentiment. >> it's a 50 day, 200 day, but at the end of the day, it's just about credibility and confidence in the turkish government. this is something we've been calling for. offshore creditors need to see a little more give-and-take between turkey and the market. by calling for new elections, this is what's rattling markets. we have seen the lira blow points,six, 450 basis these are key levels that put it on par with places like nigeria, pakistan. the frontier market economy. they have their work cut out for them to put themselves in the right place. ♪ mobile to provide phone service in the u.s., rejected today by regulators who say that national security concerns about the companies

controlled by beijing adds friction to trade relations between the world's biggest economies. was this a shock? >> to me, after seeing this, this may have been the least surprising thing i've read this week. the chinese carrier, china mobile, amid trade discussions, everything going on between the u.s. and china, trying to break into the u.s. market to become a telecom provider, there was no way this is going to happen in this climate. i don't find this surprising one bit. ♪ a third day after the african national congress looks on track for a convincing win in national elections. anc got 55% of the vote, which could means -- what does it mean for the president and his agenda? mandate for the president last year, it would give him the strength within his party to make a lot of unpopular

decisions, cleaning up the state owned enterprises which have large debts, appointing his own cabinet with people he trusts to implement his agenda, and tackling the scandal tainted officials who are still in government and are relics of the zuma era. ♪

♪ i want to draw our viewers to the bloomberg terminal, this is a blog about earnings. saying it going fast, that they are spending very heavily before interest tax appreciation. >> there are about 30,000 functions on the bloomberg and we always enjoy showing you our favorites on bloomberg television. maybe they will become your favorites. here's another function you'll find useful.

it will give you detailed information on initial public offerings, past and present, from around the world, including this week's highly anticipated debut by uber. the ride-hailing company began trading on friday, and we spoke with the ceo on the floor of the new york stock exchange. ♪ road, and thethe price dropped to the lower end of the range, lower than what your bankers had floated at least a couple months ago. what were investors responding to? what were they telling you? >> there was a group of investors that absolutely loved the platform story, transportation as a service platform, a $12 trillion market play. but i think how hard it is to execute, how expensive it is, how capital-intensive it is, those are all challenges. the good news about the road is investors were long-term oriented, they believe in our

vision, and now we have to execute to make sure the bet they made on us is for the best. >> you have compared the company to amazon. you have some investors who think it more be like ebay. there are questions about how big the ride-hailing market can be. how do you deliver on amazon? >> you got to execute. and when you think about what amazon did, they went beyond other categories of retail. what books are to amazon and we are expanding beyond rides. as we expand each category, we expand our audience all around the world. >> lyft has struggled. how much have you been following that and how much does that impact the pricing today and the sentiment we are feeling? >> i think there is certainly some effect. they are a very different company. we are the global player, we are the category leader, and we are

getting into a number of different transportation categories. well we don't think we are a direct conflict, certainly some people look at it. they have gone through a tough opening but i think that for both companies going after car ownership, deep bundling all of these cars, takes an enormous market, and long-term i believe they can succeed and we can. >> 20 you think you are going to get losses below $1 billion per year? >> we haven't been specific about losses one way or the other, but we have plenty of markets that are contribution positive. i think that going forward we can grow the business and improve markets. ♪ much more find information at ipo go on the bloomberg. you can also find it at bloomberg.com, along with all the latest business news and analysis, 24 hours a day. that will be all for "bloomberg

best" this week. thanks for watching. this is bloomberg. ♪

♪ emily: uber's rocky debut meets market anxiety. we will sit down with the ceo to talk about the underwhelming first day. plus, the u.s. delivers on its threat to hike tariffs on more than $200 billion of chinese goods after talks fizzled in washington. president trump says there is no rest for a deal.