mentioning the redesign of toilet paper? charmin will change the perforated line to a scalloped edge. >> thank goodness. >> and they say we don't innovate anymore? scalloped edge in toilet paper. it's going the change the world and society. >> welcome to "closing bell." i'm scott wapner from the new york stock exchange. this make or break hour begins with rate relief as a weak adp report sends yields lower. stocks take their cue and try to get back on track today. we'll see how it goes but there's your scorecard with 60 minutes to go in regulation. hasn't been the strongest day for the dow, as you see, but after yesterday's selloff, green of any kind is a welcome sight, isn't it? salesforce, microsoft, the big winners for the industrials today and speaking of tech, the nasdaq is outperforming on that holdback in rates, despite a rare downgrade for apple today.

keybanc taking a knife to that stock. it's still higher, though, nonetheless, and that is helping to keep the market upright. there's apple getting a little bit of a lift. it does take us to our talk of the tape. the rising rate reality and whether we're getting close to the end of the recent move. you've got to think we need to be if stocks can get anything going from here. dan greenhouse, liz young with us as well, and so is cnbc contributor rick. we got a big desk because we got a big story. greg branch, is this your moment? is your call that stocks are going to have a really rough go in the process of taking place? >> i think it's starting to take place, scott, and i think as you know, i see another 10% downside from here. at this juncture, we still haven't seen many of the catalysts happen for my thesis to play out, and that is that consensus estimates are just too high.

i am higher and longer than consensus, and that means that i see no path to an 8% fourth quarter, now an 8.3% fourth quarter, which means that i see nopath to a 12.2% growth rate on earnings in 2024. >> all right. liz young. he's been negative for a while. market's gotten away from him a little bit. he hasn't wavered at all and now he's feeling like this maybe is his moment. >> i mean, i respect an opinion that if you feel wrong and you stick to it. i've been cautious all year. obviously, we're getting a little reprieve today but i think it's just that. it's a brief reprieve, pretty big down day yesterday, scary across sectors, scary across rates, and this idea of a 5% ten-year now is not that far off and then you start to worry about, what is a 6% ten-year look like? and one of the things that i have been thinking about a lot today and will be thinking about for the rest of the week is the resteepening of the yield curve, and i have said this over and over again. it's not the inversion that's

the problem. it's the resteepening, and we have resteepened by a lot of basis points, now i think at 31 basis points as we're shooting this. that's what the problem usually is. >> okay, so, you're on team gundlach because he tweets, "deep inverting very rapidly should put everyone on recession warning, not just recession watch. if the unemployment rate ticks up just a couple tenths, it will be a recession alert. buckle up." is that what we should be worried about? >> i'm going to take issue with this. i take issue with a lot of what was just said, but we'll focus on this. the yield curve inverting, liz is exactly right, and everyone who's made this point, it's not the inversion. inversion is the starting of the clock, so to speak. it's the resteepening, if you will, that indicates that you're close to recession. but we have ask ourselves, why? and historically, it's because rates in yen are coming down, but particularly the two-year is

coming down because the market is starting to price in or realize rate cuts. that's not what's happening today. the curve is getting closer to zero because the ten-year is moving higher, and i'm not sure we should take historical analogies, which are not perfect parallels, and apply them to today and reach a similar conclusion. i don't think that's fair. >> today, that is exactly what's happening, so today is different than yesterday. today, the two-year did come down further than the ten-year came down, so there was a resteepening that accelerated. >> one day. >> it's because of the weak jobs report. it's all based on the fed is going to cut sooner. i take your point, though, completely. the resteepening that happened earlier this year during the regional bank stuff was the troublesome resteepening where the two-year came down rapidly. my take is more so that the upside surprises to economic data won't last, especially at these rate levels, and if you get to a point where the long-term average between twos and tens is a positive 88 basis points, if the two-year stays where it is, that suggests a

ten-year of about 6%, and i don't see that as sustainable and something that we can get to without pain. >> that's the kind of pain that greg branch says is coming because you do think we're getting to that level? >> i do. and to follow on something that liz said, for the last few months, what we have been doing is taking things that are episodic and trying to make them a trend. yes, we had an 89,000 job add, which is in the right direction, but we had historically low job benefits applications two weeks ago. we're stuck at 3.5%. to take that one point and say this is a trend has been a mistake we have been making over and over again for the last four months. so, when you look at what consensus is forecasting and when you look at the -- where we are right now, and don't forget, scott, i'm still at 6%, so i still believe that the fed has action the take that is currently not discounted in the market. >> the former vice chair said the fed may well be done. >> she did. sorry, he did, and there are

other representatives who said there is at least one more. we'll see. they've given us head fakes before. last year, sent us on a pivot party that didn't happen, and so when i look out at 2024, and i look out at the estimates for 2024, i wonder how consensus can have both of these things. i wonder how we can forecast rate cuts and 12.2% earnings growth. and so, i don't think both can occur. i think you would, quite frankly, need to be below my estimate of 2.25%, which is one of the reasons i don't think we get rate cuts next year. >> let me tell you how both can occur. i'm not saying this is what should be the baseline scenario, but it is the fed's baseline scenario. if you look at their economic projections, if you will, they're effectively forecasting exactly what you're talking about, the type of environment that will allow them to cut rates a few times next year, economy still expands, employment goes up a little bit but not so much, and inflation continues to glide down through 2026. there's a lot more to talk about with respect to that, but if that comes to pass, and to your

point, they have been as wrong as the private sector for quite some time now -- >> i don't think that's a 12.2% earnings growth scenario what you have just described. >> he's describing a soft landing scenario. >> which is not a 12.2% earnings growth scenario. that's what i'm saying, how do we get both? >> it might be excessive but whether it's 8% or 12% is not really the point. if you have that environment unfold. again, i'm not sure that it will, but if you do have that environment unfold, the path for earnings in the stock market is going to be higher because in a larger sense, what the fed is effectively saying, whether, again, it comes to pass or not, is we are not willing to do the damage to the economy necessary to get inflation to target sooner. we'll take a little higher inflation and a little unemployment in exchange for inflation reaching target in 026. if that happens, that means the fed is not going to do some of the extra 6% rate hikes that you projected, and again, they might have to, but in terms of how do you get the earnings growth, how do you get the equity gains, et cetera, how are credit

spreads appropriately priced, that's the scenario. >> what if, greg, you're ignoring the trend of falling inflation, which it has been. it's been -- it has been. wouldn't you agree? >> i would not -- i don't think i would agree with as much disinflation as you're implying. the fact is that up until recently, core has been expanding by 30 to 40 basis points every month with the exception of june and july. when you look at the underlying metrics of the inflation reports, airlines was down 8%. utilities was down 1.7%. and used cars were down 70 basis points. nothing else was down more than 40 basis points. >> but i mean, goods inflation has come down a lot. housing inflation has come down. it's that nonhousing services area that's been, you know, more sticky than i think the fed and others would like. but if the economy's going to slow to a degree that the fed wants it to, if you have a slowdown in job growth, you know, citi data today suggests

that the consumer credit card usage is continuing to slow. if you get the kind of slowdown that the fed wants to achieve, you could continue to get pulldown in inflation as well. without crashing everything. >> you could. the risk is that we're interpreting any disinflation as the needed disinflation, and those are not the same thing. we, of course, are going to experience some disinflation with 500 basis points of interest rate hikes, but the problem is, yeah, the services inflation, not the goods inflation, and we can applaud the good inflation all day, but those 89,000 jobs that were added to the economy, that he has were all in services. >> hang on one second. for the viewer, and michael made this point earlier on the network with sara, the adp report is not exactly the best predictor either of economic performance or the friday employment report, so we need to take the adp report a little bit of grain of salt. >> that goes both ways. perhaps the number is actually

higher. >> what makes you wrong? where do you get it wrong? >> i get it wrong if there is something fundamentally in the economy that does get us to 8% earnings growth. now, the reason i think that we can't get there is that the cost of capital is significantly higher than earlier in the year or last year. the base effect is going to be more unfavorable. that's an inflation number. wage pressures are slated to continue, at least in the services sector, and i see the consumer weakening, and you know, one of the things that you waved off last time we were on, dan, is delinquencies are increasing rapidly. >> normalizing. >> they're increasing rapidly as well. both. both can be true, dan >> sure. >> you know, we're now up at 3.5%. the new credit cards, which are the consumers most at risk, that delinquency rate is above pre-pandemic levels at 7.3%, so i don't see where this environment is telling us that we can get an 8% aerearnings grh rate. >> the rebuttal that you'll get,

because i've gotten the same rebuttal, that you get to the 8% earnings growth rate because capital is harder to get, too expensive, is that if it's driven by companies that can internally finance their growth, then they don't need to borrow money. they're not constrained by this capital environment, and that's partially true. i think the issue and the risk is that if the expectation is 8 or 9% earnings growth, in my opinion, the risk is bigger on the revenue side. inflation has fallen. we can't justify the price pass-throughs. companies don't have that pricing power, so they've raised prices as much as they're going to be allowed to based on what the consumer will pay. revenues are capped out. revenues can't grow to maintain this level of cost, so they have to cut costs. they've cut a lot of costs already. the next thing left to cut is labor. if you look at -- and i know history is only a guide -- but if you look at a long-term chart of the unemployment rate, when it hits a bottom, that's right before it spikes back up. it never hits a bottom and then chugs along at the bottom. it gets really tight and then it flies back up. >> you think earnings are going

to be good for this reported season? >> good is relative. and so, the aexpectation -- >> better than you and others have thought for quarter after quarter after quarter? they've largely been better than you thought. >> they have been better than we thought and that was because we were pumping a lot of stimulus into the economy. right now we're at a contraction of ten basis points. i think it will hit that on the head. i think we see a fourth straight quarter of negative earnings growth. >> a lot of that is energy, and not that you should do this, although on the network we all do that, but if you excel energy, you're got a couple percentage points. >> if you look at the earnings growth, i'm not sure if we have this in the back or not. projections aren't to be down. this is the quarter where you tick up, and then you continue to go up, and obviously, you're more robust as you get into 2024. the story surprised almost everybody, that the economy has remained as resilient as it has. you can't get it wrong every

time and say it's because of the stimulus here or find another reason of why the economy has performed better. the fact of the matter is, it's just performed better. consumers have remained more flush than we thought despite a manufacturing recession. the overall economy has hung in there. now it's at two-thirds, 80% or so consumer driven economy, so i totally get it, but the story hasn't taken the horrible turn that a lot of the forecasters who are big bears want it to. >> let's distinguish between what we think and what we want, because we think that it might take a horrible turn, doesn't mean that we want it to. it's a fair point that you make, scott. i don't think any of us look back on what we got wrong or what we did wrong to explain it away. i think we look back to figure out so that we don't get it wrong the next time. and i think that no one can deny that there was a lot of stimulus pumped into the economy. we just had $9 billion of student loan debt erased.

that's stimulative. that saves and postpones the duress on the consumer. these things are happening. whether it's good or bad, i leave for others to decide, but it does have an impact on the -- >> but we're going from -- i feel like in some respects, liz, we're going from an environment which, you know, those who are more cautious or negative describe it as, well, the consumer has run out of money, so you go from big spending to off the cliff. and then, other areas that have been strong, you just widgo fro there off the cliff, and it doesn't necessarily have to be that way. >> it doesn't have to be that way. it could start very slowly and i think there are indications that consumer spending has pulled back. a plateau in credit card borrowing is an indication they've pulled back and the bigger question is, have they stopped borrowing more on credit cards because they max out? have they stopped borrowing because they can't make the current payment? is it just that we're taking a break and waiting to see what happens? the only way that consumer spending falls off a cliff like that is if the labor market falls off a cliff.

people are going to keep spending as long as they feel employed or feel optimistic about getting a new job if they end up unemployed. when the labor market -- if and when the labor market cracks, that's when you'll see consumers really pull back. >> now, look, these guys have, you know, kind of the trend, the recent trend on their side of a market certainly under the surface that's troubling. the sdy has made lower lows on 33 of the last 50 trading days. that's tied for the most in the etf system. >> not great. >> we got to get off the mega cap bus for a minute and really look under the hood and say, well, i mean, i need a hose replaced over here. i got oil leaking over here. can we get past that? >> i don't think, to greg and liz's credit, or to reinforce their point, i don't think people in their camp do a good enough job of emphasizing the point that you just made, which can be illustrated in the equal weight index. if you guys want to be -- the royal you guys -- want to say,

hey, the fed's raised rates by 500-something basis points, that's going to have an effect on the economy or the market. don't look at the s&p 500. look at the equal weight index, because i, money manager at firm a, b, and c, need to pick stocks and outperform. that index is basically down on the year. yes, the index is up. we know this. this is not unknown to viewers on the panel. nvidia, apple, et cetera. the average stock is down. so, you can say with some gusto, some emphasis, the federal reserve has raised rates by 550 basis points,they might have to do more, and stocks have reacted. >> can you also say that therefore, when, you know, those might suggest that, well, the market's so overvalued relative to where interest rates are? i mean, you can pick at the seven forward pes of the megacaps, but under the surface, to your point, is it really -- >> the equal weight is trading at call 15, including the seven. that said, i want to make -- i want to rebut something they

said earlier very quickly. greg made the appropriate point. the reason why you go back to explain why it was wrong is so you don't make the same mistake again. what he left out is with respect to the consumer, the gdp, et cetera, that just happened, showed us consumers had more savings than we anticipated. there's even more ammunition. forget the $9 billion, which is a drop in the bucket. consumers had multiple hundreds of billions of dollars of extra savings than we thought. that is a positive. >> greg, let's just paint this picture and see if it's realistic to get to the final portrait. rates stop going up. the fed doesn't do anything more, and earnings surprise us and they come in okay and the consumer manages to hang in enough. job losses don't accelerate to any meaningful degree. sure, hiring slows. maybe adp is a tell. but under that scenario, that

doesn't sound, in my book, as super negative for equities. >> that sounds like a great scenario. it doesn't sound like one that gets you to 2% inflation, though. >> maybe, maybe not tomorrow, but as long as the fed knows you're on the path there, you know, to dan's point, and what has been reported over the last month is this change of focus somewhat from the fed of, used to be erring on the side of doing too little, right? they would just keep doing it, keep doing it, because they didn't want to make the mistake of what happened in the '70s, but that has now morphed into, as dan suggested, not doing too much for no reason. and hurting an economy they actually might be -- i know it's hard for some to think -- they might actually be able to pull it off. >> and i think that it's easy for us to hypothesize about this. i think the luxury that 200 million americans don't have and that the fed probably doesn't have is that things that used to cost a dollar in 2021 now cost

$1.30 and while that might not be meaningful for much of our audience, for 200 million americans that live in a family of four that make $70,000 a year, that is very meaningful. i think the fed will approach this with more urgency than they have let on. >> let's go real quick. transports have been weak. small caps have been weak. utilities have been weak. home builders, cruises. >> the consumer finance companies. >> all of those types of companies. is that a worrisome sign that we should talk about more? >> yeah, there's a lot of weakness going on right now. i think a lot of this is the correction of the strength of the rally that we had. obviously, the speed of the adjustment of interest rates is a problem. it's not necessarily the level. it's the speed. and i think if you can, to echo some of the points made on "the halftime report", if you can find a level and stop going up, you have the seasonality as a tailwind. >> speaking of, nasdaq high of the day, up 1.25%. >> they knew i was going to say it. >> well, as rates have taken a breather, and i don't know.

things are unsettled if you downgrade apple, and apple goes up and the nasdaq does too. go figure. guys, thanks. appreciate it very much. greg branch, liz young, dan greenhaus. question of the day. would you buy apple on today's downgrade? head to @cnbcclosingbell on x to vote. top stocks to watch, kristina partsinevelos joining us now. >> travel stocks are getting relief as oil prices pull back. the cruise lines are in the green with the exception of -- no, they're all positive right now, royal caribbean up almost 3%. this is after a sharp drop yesterday, and many of the major airlines have warned of higher fuel prices, just in the last few weeks or so, and that's part of the reason they're all off about 10% or more just in the last month. but today, we're seeing green across the board with the winner, american airlines, up over 3%. cal-maine is lower, though, after the egg producer reported a 30% drop in revenue compared with last year. that comes alongside a 30% decline in egg prices, which the

company says have now normalized from last year's record. remember when we were talking about that? egg prices soaring. cal-maine stock, down 6.5. we are just getting started right here on "closing bell." up next, green shoots for big tech, one of the hardest-hit sectors over the past month. our next guest sees clearer skies for that space in the months ahead. he makes his case. he shares his plays. we do it after the break. we're live from the new york stock exchange. i'm kareem abdul jabbar. i was diagnosed with afib. the first inkling that something was wrong was i started to notice that i couldn't do things without losing my breath. i couldn't make it through the airport, and every like 20 or 30 yards

i had to sit down and get my breath. every physical exertion seemed to exhaust me. and finally, i went to the hospital where i was diagnosed with afib. when i first noticed symptoms, which kept coming and going, i should have gone to the doctor and told them what was happening. instead, i tried to let it pass. if you experience irregular heartbeat, heart racing, chest pain, shortness of breath, fatigue, or light-headedness, you should talk to your doctor. afib increases the risk of stroke about 5 times i want my experience to help others understand the symptoms of atrial fibrillation. when it comes to your health, this is no time to wait.

meet gold bond daily healing. a powerhouse lotion that moisturizes, heals, and smooths dry skin. with 7 moisturizers & 3 vitamins. and... new gold bond healing sensitive. clinically shown to heal & moisturize dry, sensitive skin. gold bond.

we're back on "closing bell." keybanc downgrading apple to sector weight today, slowing u.s. sales and high valuations were just some of the reasons behind that call and it's a rare one at that. joining us now to discuss, chief strategist at baker avenue wealth management. good to see you again. welcome back. >> thanks, scott. >> you don't see apple downgraded very much, especially by somebody who's been bullish like this analyst has been. what do you make of the call? >> i think the research report, there's a couple of good points. what we agree with is the iphone 15 would probably just be a more modest driver in earnings growth for 2024. what we disagree with is we don't think apple is necessarily trading at a premium valuation. in fact, it's about one standard deviation away from average over the last ten years in terms of

its multiples. we've seen the shares trade much higher, in fact, two standard deviations, three standard deviations above historical average. and frankly, we think the higher multiples may be warranted since the company's pivoting to more of the services business. so, some good points but overall, we disagree with the research note. >> i think there are many who would suggest that they're not sure that apple deserves a 28 times forward pe. that's well higher than its historical average. how do we justify it when we know that we've been in an environment, at least, where revenue growth has been consistently slower? >> yeah, i think you justify it with the fact that these services business is a growing part of apple's hardware business. i think this year, you know, it's a little harder to justify, given that apple's earnings, to be honest this year, is kind of modest. but looking into 2024, and 2025,

you're actually seeing a little bit of acceleration in earnings growth. so, relative to what we see potentially for an iphone 16 catalyst, we actually are much more excited about the next generation of iphones and the iphone 15. we think that's going to be a catalyst for a lot of user upgrades. >> yeah. what about -- what about tech overall right now? certainly looks a little shaky as rates have gone up over the last month, these stocks have come down. what now? how do you make the case to buy the dip if you do? >> it's been tough, i would say, since the july 31st month-end, markets have been down about 7%. i would say tech has done a little bit better than that. you can look at the qqq, it's done better than the overall s&p. however, i do think we're near a bottom here. perhaps we have a few more down days. the reason why i think that is number one, i think a lot of the headwinds that we've seen will start to dissipate in the second half of october. you know, we've seen some seasonal tax law selling from

mutual funds that have a 10/31 fiscal year end. they need to do their tax losses by then. we've seen cash raises from clients as well, selling for raising cash for california's tax payment, which is about $100 billion that california didn't give to the irs. i think there were some factors coming from there. we're also seeing technical factors. we saw the vicks invert. the last time we saw that was back in march, and the market gained about 18% to the highs, and now we're still about 10% from that vicks inversion. we saw that yesterday. we're about 8% of the s&p stocks are, you know, above their 50-day moving average. that typically bottoms out at 5%, so we're seeing a lot of technical data that also suggests that we're getting near the bottoms here. >> i mean, second half of october, that not coincidentally coincides with when these companies are going to report earnings.

so, you must assume that we're going to get some pretty special deliveries. >> you're right. i mean, if you're looking for q3 earnings, what's interesting is among the tech sector, communications and technology and amazon, specifically, since the the end of the second quarter, we've seen earnings estimates tick higher by analysts. so, we're not seeing too many sectors out of the s&p. actually, increasing estimates. so, the tech sector's actually one of the few, and the fact that share prices have been down since the end of july, it makes the valuation hurdle that much easier to eclipse. >> king, we'll leave it there. king lip, joining us from baker avenue today. straight ahead, roger altman, waiting in the wings. how he sees the market set up into year-end. when will this rate rise end? not to mention the dysfunction in d.c.

all of it taking a toll on investor sentiment.

s&p and nasdaq rebounding today, treasury yield pulling back from multiple highs, but my next guest sees more ahead for stocks. evercore's roger altman, good to see you. welcome down here. we have more rough times ahead? >> i think it's going to be hard for markets to do well between now and the end of the year. the level of interest rates, as you've been talking about so much, at the margin, makes bonds more attractive than the stocks. if you have about a 5% yield on the ten-year and you look at all the uncertainty, whether it's in washington or whether it's hard landing versus soft landing, it's not a bad place to be, at least temporarily. and then you have some fresh concern about whether there -- we can really count on a soft landing with this level of interest rates and some other

factors, and then you have the mess in washington. and in particular, the likelihood of another shutdown, and any time you don't have a speaker of the house, which is a figure -- i mean, a position we decided directly in the constitution, that's not a good thing. you have some fresh concern over the fiscal trajectory of the country, which i think is quite poor, and it manifests itself in a massive supply of treasurys, of course, but also just no interest in washington in addressing it. and when you have a roughly $2 billion deficit when the economy is as resilient as it is right now, and the outlook for the debt to gdp ratio as it is, it's not good. >> so, rates have obviously backed up a bunch. we're talking about the prospects of a 5% ten-year. how high do you see rates going? are we getting to the point where we've just moved a little too far a little too fast and we're going to stop this upward momentum some point soon? >> of course, it's hard to know,

but i would -- my best guess would be, they're not going to go a lot higher because we have an environment where inflation, even though it's stubborn, is coming down. and that's obviously good, because people focus on real returns, as they should. and i also think the economy is more likely to be softer at the margin than stronger, which obviously is a positive from the point of view of a cap on yields. so, i would doubt that rates are going to go a lot higher, although there is a sense, as you know, that the so-called neutral rate or rate at which the economy is neither expanding or contracting, should be higher than people have been thinking it would be. that has a fair amount to do with why rates have jumped up. are they going to go a lot higher? i would be surprised. >> the fed is trying to figure out if the neutral rate is in the right place. rich mentioned it earlier, the former vice chair, suggests maybe they are done, and you have to believe they want to be

done. they don't want to inflict undue harm on what's been a better economy than even their forecasts suggested it would be. let's not forget, they got the forecast on the economy incorrect, and they've gotten the forecast on inflation incorrect. so -- >> historical error, i might say. >> that's going to be talked about for decades. but what do we do with it now? what if there's enough still in the economy that they can pull it off? >> as you know, the futures market at the moment is signaling less -- that it's not very likely the fed will hike again, at least this year. i think that makes sense, because if you're the fed, you're surprised, i think, by this level of open market interest rates, not the overnight rate you control, but the ten-year, the 30-year, et cetera, i think you're surprised by that, you're a little concerned as to how much it is tightening financial conditions in addition to what you have done at the fed. >> the lag effects haven't even -- they've got to be

wondering, wow, we thought the lag effects would already be starting to take hold. maybe these are first winds blowing in before the storm, but that's been a surprise too, and they probably think there's more to come. >> yeah, i think if you're the fed, you're feeling cautious. i think the mentality probably is, at the moment, steady as she goes. no change. as to next year and when they will cut, how many cuts, i just think that's data dependent. we just aren't going to know that for a while. >> do you think, though, that they will cut rates next year? >> i do. i do. and i think that because i think it's going to be -- the economy has been remarkably resilient, but there are some factors that are more down beat, you know, apparently, for 80% of americans, the surplus pandemic-related household savings are now gone, and that's going to work its way through consumer spending and retail. the top 20%, yes, still pretty flush, but the everyday american

consumer, not as flush as she was three months ago, six months ago, and so forth. and a few other factors. i think that are going to cause the fed to feel more -- i mean, we have to wait and see how inflation progresses, but i think they'll hit their target on inflation in the next medium term, and i think they'll cut rates. i'm not sure how often, but they'll cut rates next year starting by mid-year. >> as you were seeing the first half of your answer just now, i was going to come back and say, so, you're suggesting they're going to cut out of necessity, because the economy has weakened to the point where they've got to do something, but you finished by saying, inflation's going to come down enough that they'll be able and willing to cut rates for that very reason. >> i think there will be a sense that they finish the job, that they've solved or at least mostly solved the inflation problem, and that that's their core mission after all. >> yeah. >> and that there will probably be some soft, i don't know about recession, but soft economic

data and the combination of having solved inflation and somewhat softer just growth factors, i think will cause them to begin to cut back. >> that sounds like a good scenario for stocks, no? >> i think stocks should do pretty well next year, because under that scenario, broad market rates would come back a little bit, come in a little bit. >> sure, yeah. >> and that would be positive for stocks. and if you don't think there's going to be a recession, and right now the market still is more in the soft landing camp, it should be a pretty good environment for stocks, yeah. >> what about m&a? >> there's two countertrends going on right now. at one level, activity levels are definitely up, backlog is up, and announcements are beginning to improve. at another level, though, all this macroeconomic and global financial uncertainty causes liz leaders and decision makers to pull back. i think the first factor, improved activity, is at the moment a little more prominent than the second, and by the way,

earnings remain good and that's a positive for confidence, but it's kind of a little bit of a rising tide and a falling tide at the same time. >> i appreciate it very much. thanks for coming down here. that's roger altman joining us right here at post nine. up next, we track the biggest movers as we head into the close and kristina partsinevelos is standing by once again. >> well, software firm palontir shares are up. and beer and medical marijuana, the saving grace for one company? we discuss next.

just about 15 minutes before the closing bell. let's get back to kristina partsinevelos for a look at the stocks she's watching. >> thank you, scott. tilray reporting larger than expected loss in q1 with the ceo telling cnbc just this morning that "it's frustrating when you look at our stock and have all this great growth opportunity." you can see the shares are down about 16% year to date. the company has been expanding recently in medical marijuana as well as beer. it acquired eight beer and beverage brands from anheuser-busch and the stock is off its lows of the day, but like i said, still down 17%, despite all those growth opportunities. palantir shares popping on a bloomberg report that the software firm has the top pick for a contract and that would be the uk's national health service. the report said the deal is

worth $550 million and should be announced later this month. i reached out to palantir, they didn't respond back in time. shares are up almost 6%. >> what a difference a day makes. those shares -- >> just yesterday. >> got crushed, yeah. >> because of the yields. >> thank you, kristina partsinevelos. last chance to weigh in on our question of the day. we asked, would you buy apple on today's downgrade? head to @cnbcclosingbell. first, a quick message as cnbc celebrates hispanic heritage. >> as a first generation cuban american, both of my parents were born in cuba. migrated here to the u.s. for political reasons. growing up in miami, the cultural melting pot that it is, was always a comforting feeling because i always felt like i was surrounded by folks that understood my heritage and understood the dynamics of my culture, and now that i'm able to raise my own kids here in miami, it's really nice, because

we're able to really keep a lot of our own cultural heritage of our own cultural heritage alive. not selling hot dogs, i invest in a fund that advances innovations like robotics. fresh, warm hot dogs, straight out of my torso! u, one for you. oh, you're a messy one. cool, right? so cool. anyone can become an agent of innovation with invesco qqq, a fund that gives you access to nasdaq-100 innovations. hot dogs! fresh, warm hot dogs! before investing carefully read and consider fund investment objectives, risks, charges, expenses and more in prospectus at invesco.com. hi, my name is damion clark. and if you have both medicare and medicaid, i have some really encouraging news that you'll definitely want to hear. depending on the plans available in your area, you may be eligible to get extra benefits with a humana medicare advantage dual-eligible special needs plan. all of these plans include a healthy options allowance. a

monthly allowance to help pay for eligible groceries, utilities, rent, and over-the-counter items like vitamins, pain relievers, first-aid supplies and more. the healthy options allowance is loaded onto a prepaid card each month. and whatever you don't spend, carries over from each month. other benefits on these plans include free rides to and from your medical appointments. you pay nothing for covered prescriptions, all year long. all plans have dental coverage which includes 2 free cleanings a year, fillings, and a yearly exam. they also have vision coverage including vision exams and a yearly allowance towards eyewear such as lenses or contacts. and hearing coverage, which includes routine hearing tests and coverage for hearing aids. you'll also have a $0 copay for the shingles and other routine vaccines at in-network retail pharmacies. plus, your doctor, hospital and pharmacy may already be part of our large humana networks. so, call the

number on your screen now to speak with a licensed humana sales agent. wouldn't you love benefits like a monthly allowance to help pay for eligible groceries, utilities, rent and over-the-counter items? so, if you have medicare and medicaid, call the number on your screen now and speak with a licensed humana sales agent. if you're eligible, they can even help enroll you over the phone in a humana medicare advantage dual-eligible special needs plan. so, call now. humana. a more human way to healthcare. thanks to avalara, we can calculate sales tax automatically. avalarahhhhhh what if tax rates change? ahhhhhh filing sales tax returns? ahhhhhh

business license guidance? ahhhhhh -cross-border sales? -ahhhhhh -item classification? -ahhhhhh does it connect with acc...? ahhhhhh ahhhhhh ahhhhhh oofrmt the results now of our question of the day, would you buy apple on today's downgrade? it's neck and neck, yes, barely winning out. stock is up. coming up, energy stocks slammed as crude oil pulling back to its lowest level in nearly a month. plus the latest check on the health of the consumerhe wn costco reports its september sales in o.t. that and much more when we take you in the mz. that's the market zone for you that's the market zone for you playing at home.pand as well.

we need to rethink... next level moments, need the next level network. [speaker continues in the b the network with 24/7 built-in security. chip? at&t business. that first time you take a step back. i made that. with your very own online store. i sold that. and you can manage it all in one place. i built this. and it was easy, with a partner that puts you first. godaddy.

here's why you should switch with a partner from chrome to duckduckgo. duckduckgo is a browser you download to your mobile and desktop devices. unlike chrome, the duckduckgo browser has privacy built-in. it comes with a private alternative to google search, which doesn■t spy on your searches, and it blocks cookies and creepy ads. and there's no catch. it's free. we make money from ads, but they don't follow you around.

join the millions of people taking back their privacy by downloading duckduckgo on mobile and desktop today. gold isn't merely a commodity. it's an investment in people and communities. at osisko, we strive to build modern, safe, and sustainable mines that benefit all. think big. shape tomorrow. osisko. power e*trade's easy-to-use tools, like dynamic charting and risk-reward analysis help make trading feel effortless. and its customizable scans with social sentiment help you find and unlock opportunities in the market. e*trade from morgan stanley. with powerful, easy-to-use tools, power e*trade makes complex trading easier. react to fast-moving markets with dynamic charting

and a futures ladder that lets you place, flatten, or reverse orders so you won't miss an opportunity. e*trade from morgan stanley ♪ we're now in the "closing bell" market zone. cnbc senior markets commentator mike santoli here to break down the crucial moments of the trading day. crude oil is tumbling to lows today. what to expect from costco when it reports. mike, you first. we're kind of at the highs of the day. nasdaq's 1.37%. dow is now good for triple digits. s&p, back above 4,200. what do you make of it? >> stepping into it pretty tentatively and just sort of one eye if not both eyes on the bond market. usually, bonds are going to do

what they're going to do by 3:00 p.m. eastern time. you get the treasury futures trading on the floor. it ends around there, felt as if it was safe to say, fine, we have this little bit of a bid in treasurys and that was enough to get this oversold market moving a little bit. it is still the megacaps. you know, we've lost 300 s&p points in about three weeks from high to low, and we regained about 34 of them. so, obviously, it's baby steps. we stopped just short, so far, of that 200-today average, so maybe we've tested the technical scenario a little bit. now it's all about what the economic narrative is going to be. also, a net positive that the bond market did respond to slightly softer economic numbers. it showed you that it wasn't just about yields blitzing higher based on fear and self-reinforcing supply concerns. >> you said it. it's too soon to declare that it's anything other than a short-lived reprieve. and to your other point, it's largely going to depend on what bond yields do.

we have a jobs report, right, on friday, and then the bond market's closed on monday too. you have some for columbus day. lot of interesting things coming up that could drag this market around >> without a doubt. it's a little bit of a delicate fundamental situation because you want to see enough softening in the economy that the bond market can find some kind of real buying in there and have a reversal in that upside in yields or at least get the stock market used to the idea that it's not going to fly higher from here while also, of course, you don't want to pull forward the real slowdown and the real recession concerns. so, we will see, but it's pretty well scripted here. 200-day average test, oversold market. we'll see if the rally has more than a day in it. >> oil might be a determining factor, pippa stevens, and that is a big relief because it seems to have been pretty relentless on the way up. >> scott, it was a brutal today here for oil closing as you said down almost 6%. and actually falling below that 50-day moving average for the first time since july. we did have that virtual opec

meeting this morning where the group reiterated its commitment to those production cuts through the end of the year. so, perhaps some signals there that they don't see the global economy on all that strong of a footing, but it feels like some of the headwinds that the oil market had been ignoring on that relentless climb higher are now starting to catch up. that's the higher dollar as well as what higher for longer rates might ultimately mean for oil demand, and we are starting to see some cracks in gasoline demand, specifically the gasoline crack spread has all been collapsed, really falling off a cliff with rbob futures down 7% or so today. we got the latest data from the eia today that showed demand was down over 8% over the last month compared to last year. we saw so much interest in this trade, money flowing into the sector over the past few months, and bullish bets outnumbered bearish bets 6 to 1 and so it was looking really overbought. there was just too much momentum behind this, so this pullback today, perhaps, not all that surprising. that said, scott, while that

$100 level might be further afield, it feels like we've reset on the downside and we will see higher lows looking forward. >> all right, we'll see. pippa, thank you. now to courtney reagan. we spoke yesterday about the destruction court in some of these discretionary names. well, we got costco coming with earnings in overtime. what do we think? >> costco is the lone retailer reporting these monthly comparable sales and last week, it reported another solid quarter, but we did note continued softness in big ticket nonfood items so investors won't be surprised if sales are down slightly from last year. placer.ai store traffic data for costco, shows store traffic fell each of the three weeks of september compared to those weeks last year. gasoline may begin to act a little bit more like a tailwind than a headwind for costco. we'll see how that impacts the numbers. consumers are in this pressure cooker, right? it's likely only a matter of time until spending gets pulled

in more sharply, but costco members skew a little bit higher, but still like the deal, particularly on essentials, so it's a really interesting retailer to watch here. shares are up about 5% over the last month. the xrt fell 8%. consumer discretionary and consumer staples etfs fell 5% in that same period of time. i would put costco more in that staples category, but again, they sell a little bit of everything, and so i think we can really pull a lot from the consumer behavior in spending with them. >> courtney reagan, you just heard the two-minute warning. september sales, not earnings, i misspoke on that. let's talk about what's happening here. apple gets this really rare downgrade, and the stock is in the green, and it looks like it's going to close near the highs of the session, at least for that stock. and the nasdaq is too. >> yeah, it was a relatively tepid downgrade. the fair value estimate was like $182, above where the stock was trading. it was much more about, do we really want to pay up for apple, given the fact they might have some fundamental challenges? it does show you something,

though, that when you do have a little bit of an opening, for investors to feel as if it's safe to do some nibbling, it is the familiar, the safer, the better balance sheets. nobody's going out on a limb and going to these companies that are massive consumers of capital. so, that's usually the way it starts. i think this stuff usually goes in waves. a lot of valuation risk, whatever you want to say, whether the market's cheap or expensive, has been taken down in the last couple of months, and so you have to, you know, just see if the market is in a mood to try to reward bargain hunters or if it's still going to be like, look, we don't know how bad things are going to be. it's late cycle. we can't declare victory just yet, and we had the jobs number coming and yields. one day doesn't make a trend. >> no. nor does a bunch of buying in the nasdaq either. we'll have to see. it's one of the central questions as to whether the buy the dip folks were going to come into mega cap between now and the end of the year in a more meaningful way. >> lot of room to the end of the year.

you notice the smaller stocks not really getting much help today. >> all right. mike, thank you. we'll see mike tomorrow, of course. that does it. there's the bell. dow, good for, well, better than 140. the nasdaq, the standout today as you see interest rates taking a breather. that does it for me. morgan and jon in o.t. right now. ♪ stocks finishing near session highs. some green on your screen as we've seen some yield reprieve in the treasury market. the action is just getting start, though, welcome to "closing bell: overtime." jon fortt is off today. coming up this hour, market watcher and technical analyst jeff degraaf is making a big call on the market's next move. he's going to join us to break that down. plus we'll talk to the head of the mortgage bankers association as mortgage demand falls to its lowest level since the clinton,