tv Mad Money CNBC January 8, 2025 6:00pm-7:00pm EST
6:00 pm
to be here >> tim >> it's 18 years of an honor doing this every night taiwan semi. >> dan >> interesting announcement from ebay and meta. >> og. guy? >> great seeing d.r., great seeing you together. sn, melms. >> thank disney >> thank you for watching for 18 years. my mission is simple to make you money. i'm here to level the playing field for all investors. there's always a bull market somewhere. i promise to help you find it. "mad money" starts now i'm cramer welcome to "mad money. i'm just trying to make you money. my job is not just to entertain but to explain call me. we focus on the ten-year treasury we focus on the fed. inflation reports, these are
6:01 pm
important. all impactful to stock prices, including today. the s&p advanced the nasdaq dipped. by the way, these were nice recoveries from very ugly moments in the middle of the day. the bond market ended up where it started what we don't focus on enough here or anywhere else is froth yes, froth specifically, negative correlation between the love for the red hot stocks of flavor of the month companies that aren't doing all that well. when these firecrackers get overheated, you have to be careful. it means buyers are carried away with concepts, not earnings, not sells. the market is driving through the danger zone. i started telling you to worry about froth at the end of
6:02 pm
november, just before thanksgiving some others just kept running to my own chagrin i high greated highlighted plas some traditional sectors also. those were the results of a screen we had run searching for stocks that have a return 50% for the month of november. that's a red flag if i have ever read of one. since then, there's been a downturn in most of the stocks, which is a good sign there were some that just wouldn't quit. which is a very bad sign until yesterday. until yesterday when the helium in the balloon, quantum computing stocks got skewered. you know my position i think nvidia is the vanguard
6:03 pm
of the new industrial revolution it will touch every aspect of our lives in a short time. robots will dominate, cluesing some surprising sectors. digital ctory trin wins. machines augment humans and do a better job, especially when we deal with labor-intensive tasks. nvidia stock gets heat for being too high none of what happens there is froth. the ai revolution is real. the sales and earnings are real. they are spectacular, which is why i tell you to own this one don't trade it this can play out over multiple years. it will benefit numerous companies. it can spawn froth speculators seize on businesses that could do better than the accelerated computing and artificial intelligence that are the hallmarks of nvidia and that i love so much the worst and i mean -- i'm talk about the worst, the most
6:04 pm
dangerous, least popular, most hyped, quantum computing stocks. wizardry mixed in with alchemy that represent the worst of all worlds yesterday, an unlikely source flattened the froth. yesterday, wong told us about the truth about this group i want you to listen >> we are ably somewhere between -- order of -- five orders or six of magnitude away. if you said 15 years for very useful quantum computers, that would -- that would be on the early side if you said 30 is on the late side if you picked 20, i think a bunch of us would believe it
6:05 pm
what we are interested in is, we want to help the industry get there as fast as possible and to create the computer of the future we will be a significant part of it >> 20 years? holy cow the quantum computing stock got crushed from those words annihilated. many people thought the future was now when it came to quantum computing. it could be a competitor this year, next year, you got it. the panic sellers, they got quantum wrong. i bet these stocks have got more downside, maybe more, similar to the dotcoms of a different era you can escape before the insiders take advantage of the windfall many of you have given them by bidding these stocks up. i don't want you to get hurt you are getting your chance to get out and you need to take it.
6:06 pm
jansen questioned the use case of quantum computers all together the new industrial revolution runs on large data quantum computing needs normal computers to work. because they are so slow could make it less germane than promoters think. ouch i focused on three stocks for you in november. ionq, quantum computer and d-wave computing i changed my mind. all these companies share a couple of traits they lose tons of money and they also have no revenue one has okay revenue it got to $2 by late november, the company issued 50 million shares to raise $100 million
6:07 pm
that made it 21 bucks. that's the definition of froth that's what you never want to see if you are a true believer in a bull market today, it fell from 18 to 10 it's not too late to sell. it was at a buck a couple of months ago give me a break. same with the three we highlighted in november. quantum computing nearly got cut in half. when you do this kind of speculation, you have to know you are playing a dangerous game i think all these frothy stocks remain vulnerable. you own a stock with ai in the name, you could be in trouble. you own a hyped up alternative energy company, you need to ring the register tomorrow. they have come too far too fast for technology it could take over a decade to deploy i wrote a piece this went talking about how much i wanted to buy palentier
6:08 pm
the stock just wouldn't quit i had a huge case of fomo. i said, it's the wrong move for the trust to buy a stock that's run from 16 to 82 in one year. i felt it. i wanted it. of course, that was the top. the stock, which fell today, is at 68 now. can't stabilize. it will and that's how much i respect them it has to churn and burn before that happens shaking out all the hot money. i see that happening in every one of the speculative categories all i can say is, i told you so. i can't be part of this froth. i have seen so many people get caught up in alternative fuels, small caps, chinese stocks, the early generation enterprise software stocks. stay in this game, but i couldn't save the people who refused to sell the red hots they were greedy and then they were too poor. i take this personally i don't play for dinner anymore, but i used to. i know what you are going through.
6:09 pm
you can make money, but these are not stocks you buy and hold or invest in you gotta buy them to sell them. bottom line, if you haven't sold, sell if you actually these are sustainable, take a breath limit your risk. take profits so that you don't have to play for dinner either robert in new york >> carol >> caller: it's great to talk to you tonight. thanks for invite meg. this company i want to talk about is the biggest u.s. egg producer they beat sales estimates. not to mention, they are obtaining the production assets of ise america the bird flu has skyrocketed the egg prices this company has benefitted huge the share price has nearly doubled in the past year listen to this on april 3rd, let's go to the
6:10 pm
videotape, you said positive things on this company you got me to buy this stock i paid in the 60s. you did it for me because now the stock is at 105. >> it's not done, robert it's not done. the secret sauce behind it is not the egg shortage it's the fact that that's the protein that people who take glp-1 drugs need eggs are the best source of protein. that's why that stock is moving. i was shocked because that is the secret sauce behind their growth it's why it will make money. you can't take part in these frothy names for long. you can make money in them, but they're not investments. they are just trades you have to buy and then you have to sell, sell, sell, sell a marathon of deals hit the table this week. i'm scrolling through what we know about a potential tiktok ban and giving you a rundown of
6:11 pm
what to watch for. before i head to the west coast next week, i'm getting to hear more about what to expect from the conference with lisa gill. stay with cramer >> don't miss a second of "mad money. follow @jimcramer on x tweet cramer, #madmentions give us a call at 1-800-743-cnbc miss something head to madmoney.cnbc.com. ♪♪ ♪♪ ♪♪ ♪♪ ♪♪ ♪♪ at state street, we know everyone's trying to get somewhere. ♪♪
6:12 pm
6:13 pm
morgan stanley can help create the future only you can see. [crowd cheers] [music out] let's say you're deep in a show or a game or the game. only you can see. [crowd cheers] on a train, at home, at work. okay, maybe not at work. point is at xfinity. we're constantly engineering new ways to get the entertainment you love to you faster and easier than ever. that's what i do.
6:14 pm
6:15 pm
the ftc and justice department have taken a hard line on m & a. they are hostile to corporate consolidate. companies figured it's not worth the effort no guaranteed success. that's why when trump won in november, it became obvious we were looking at a deluge of deals. these companies couldn't even bring themselves to wait for inauguration day we have gotten a slew of merger activity monday morning, disney will combine hulu with fubo it offers a streaming content on live sports. disney is acquiring fubo 70% stake in the entity. they are snapping this up to save litigation. by the way, after the close in a
6:16 pm
bullish announcement, disney have 157 million global users streaming content with ads we talked about buying more for the trust at the 10:20 morning meeting. i'm frozen and can't buy any i like what i'm seeing the hulu deal was the appetizer. monday night through tuesday, we got several multi-billion dollar m & a transactions starting with the medical device maker stryker buying inari it is complimentary to the neurovascular business i checked it out i like this deal next early ned yesterday morning we learned getty and shutterstock
6:17 pm
the shareholders will own 55% of the combined companies two players in the same industry combining to give themselves for leverage something they need in this age of ai-generated content. later on tuesday morning, the paychex announced it is acquiring paycor, for $4.1 billion. they are rolling up human capital management listen, that's not the list activity this week on monday, phillips 66 will acquire natural gas infrastructure assets. yesterday, waste management company gfl environmental is selling its business to private equity firms for over $6 billion. yesterday, we learned small business uniform rental provider
6:18 pm
cintas was launching a takeover attempt of furse what do we make of this? i gotta say, it's nice to see mergers. this was anticipated because of the change in administration it makes me feel confident in betting on more deal activity why we bought the stock of goldman sachs. they have a huge m & a advisory business that's been in hibernation for years. it should be bought by everybody. i'm happy to see so many companies going for deals that should improve their business. looking at the transactions we have seen this week, some likely would have been challenged by
6:19 pm
biden's regulators, most seem justifiable. all of them make great business sense. there's a streaming venture with fox and warner brothers. i'm not sure that will work. now they can try it. stryker doesn't do much in the specialized embolism space where inari operates getty images and shutterstock, generative ai can create images. they will be stronger together they will be in a better position to negotiate with software developers who want to license their photos there are benefits from widespread adoption of blackwell. paychex is gaining the biden administrators -- this could draw antitrust check i can't see why this could get blocked.
6:20 pm
paychex has stiff competition. payroll processing fight with adp. stock is flying. the only proposed deal that might deserve some scrutiny is the cintas deal. tease hostile. even this raises eyebrows because they mostly serve the same small business space. i don't love the idea of squeezing any small usiness. especially if you talk about uniform rental i went to the ceo of cintas about that he pointed out they have competition. businesses can source uniforms and safety equipment from amazon, walmart, costco. by joining forces, they would be able to provide better service to their clients even if they are allowed to
6:21 pm
merge, they would serve 2 million businesses out of 18 million in the u.s. and canada i hadn't thought about the idea that it could compete with amazon and walmart to sell supplies to the small and medium-size business customers the bottom line, i'm glad we are back to reasonable arguments like this will be considered fairly rather than the situation under biden where every takeover is considered anti-competitive until proven otherwise lots of stocks will be going away given we have few ipos. there won't be new stock to replace it that's good news for investors "mad money" is back after the break. is it time's up for tiktok cramer is digging into what the future holds for the social media platform next.
6:22 pm
6:24 pm
6:25 pm
at morgan stanley, old school hard work meets bold new thinking. to help you see untapped possibilities and relentlessly work with you to make them real. is tiktok really about to be banned in the united states? do you know without intervention from the supreme court, it appears the chinese-owned social media platform might get shut down that's a huge deal on april 24, president biden signed the protecting americans from foreign adversary
6:26 pm
controlled applications act. it was crammed into a larger piece of legislation something that passed with broad bipartisan support the bill stipulated it would be banned within 270 days until the chinese owner sold the business to an american firm. it was always a long shot. tiktok is worth hundreds of billions of dollars. there are few companies that could afford it, even if both sides are willing to make a deal either way, we didn't get a deal that 270-day deadline, that works out to january 19, 2025. 11 days from today the day before president trump's inauguration the tiktok ban was challenged in court with the company arguing it violates its free speech rights under the first amendment. it worked its way through the
6:27 pm
lower courts they upheld the law. the supreme court agreed to hear the case they are hearing oral arguments on friday. given the timing, it's worth noting that trump, who tried to arrange something similar when he was last in office, changed his chance, coming out against the ban and pledging to save the platform on the campaign trail last month his lawyers filed a brief with the supreme court basically asking them to extend the deadline so he can address the ban once he is sworn in. who knows if the supreme court will play ball with the market closed tomorrow in honor of late president jimmy carter, it's worth looking at this issue before the court hears oral arguments the briefs filed by the u.s. solicitor general and tiktok give us a creative occasion how each party will argue the case tiktok is arguing it violates free speech and the rights of the users. the first amendment protects the
6:28 pm
speech of foreign adversaries even if it's propaganda. they offer an alternative to a ban. disclosure of the source of material of tiktok saying it's the least restrictive alternative too address the concern the public is being misled y the way, tiktok creators hav petitioned against the ban one of the briefs, their lawyers argued it's anathema to the first amendment because it shields americans from nothing more than the disagreeable mix of ideas the justice department claims this is not a free speech issue at all they say the law targets the national security risk stemming from china's control here is how they put it. the first amendment would not have required our nation to tolerate soefsh et viet ownershg
6:29 pm
the cold war it does not require us to tolerate ownership and control of tiktok by a foreign adversary today. i'm not convinced. we didn't let the soviets control american radio stations but we did let them publish a newspaper. they argue tiktok doesn't have any first amendment rights here because it does not control the algorithm. they argue the rights are not being violated by the law because tick tok ktok could coni it had a u.s. owner. it is the access to sensitive data the justice department says the remedy won't work, claiming such a generic standing disclosure would be patently ineffective. what's going to happen i honestly don't know. i think tiktok and its creator petitioners can score points with the first amendment argument if the government can paint a
6:30 pm
clear picture of why tiktok is a national security threat, it could be able to win given the supreme court's advantage for conservatives, you can get a sense which way most cases will break this is a tough case to game given most were strongly in favor of taking a tough line against tiktok until trump changed his mind we will get an indication during oral arguments friday, because questions tend to be pointed i'm not sure if president-elect trump's request for an extension will be considered, let alone granted. if the court does uphold the law, it's unclear what trump's options would be it's tricky because this is the result of a law passed by congress it's not an executive order that can be reversed with the stroke of a pen it may require congressional action while trump has tremendous sway with the new gop controlled congress, most of those legislators voted to ban tiktok last april we do know that if the tiktok
6:31 pm
ban is upheld, it will be enforced via app stores. apple and google users will be unable to download or receive updates what does it mean for your portfolio? most obvious answer is it's good news if not great news for the other publicly traded social media platforms. that's true for meta platforms trust holding has its own version of tiktok with reels we could see service providers take a hit oracle comes to mind no matter how this case plays out, it deserves more attention than it's getting. for the nearly nine months since the ban was passed, it feels like people have assumed something would be worked out to prevent the most draconian outcome. they figured trump would step in bottom line, we listen and we
6:32 pm
don't judge. here we are almost nine months later and it seems like the only way to stop the ban is if they win this case before the supreme court. given this isn't really a straightforward partisan issue and we listen and don't judge, let's call it anybody's ball game i'm taking questions i will start with susan in new jersey >> caller: hi, jim thank you for taking my call love your show thank you to you and your crew >> thank you >> caller: thank you i'm a second generation listener my dad watched your show my late father now i'm continuing to watch. >> i love that i'm so glad you did. i'm glad your dad loved the show that's a nice thing. thank you. >> caller: he did. i remember him watching. thank you. i took the dive and became a new member. >> fantastic we are working hard. jeff and i are working together to get this stuff right. how can i help you
6:33 pm
>> caller: you are awesome here is how you can help hdq thinking i would get a jump on the 3d printing it is just sat flat. it's been neutral, even a little in the negative. friday when everything popped. do i hold? do i sell? what's your take okay i think there are better stocks to own i expected we would get a better -- it would mean more i don't think it's going to. i would take that one -- the fact it sells low and it has a 3 3.46 yield, take that money out. blackwell is a great stock it's a different area. stocks come down 100 points. that's my favorite thank you for the great words. i will pass it on to the staff
6:34 pm
it seems like the supreme court is the only thing standing in the way of a tiktok ban. no one is talking about. since this isn't a partisan issue. it's a tossup what will happen stay focused if meta wins -- they would be the winner if tiktok is banned watch more "mad money. i'm breaking down the decline in food and beverage stocks your calls, rapid fire, the lightning round. stay with cramer
6:38 pm
point to attend jp morgan's health care conference in san francisco coming up next week. it offers access to the top ceos in the industry. it's the most important health care event of the year some people feel it's the most important conference of the year we get a preview of what we can expect from lisa gill, managing director of jp morgan. welcome back to "mad money." >> thank you i love coming every year >> thank you i know you will start things off by taking to your ceo. can you give us a preview about what you will discuss? we have a new administration we have a lot of changes in health care. i think we have a new m & a approach and a lot of deals. >> that's right. my discussion will be around health care. deregulation, what does this mean financing, rates going into next year that's how you finance deals three, you are right, most deals either get announced at our
6:39 pm
conference or meeting for the first time at our conference to put something together >> which parts of health care would be most likely to have deals? we are doing a piece tonight about deals. they seem to be in element every industry. >> across the board. a lot of what you have seen more recently has been pharma/biotech deals. you could see deals in life sciences, in services. i think from a service perspective, it's probably less likely big deals near term there's been talk about one of the managed care companies buying either a managed medicaid name or a medicare advantage name there's a lot of question around this administration about what does medicare advantage mean in this administration? >> you have -- your group, a lot of things in play. a lot of people -- take a contrary approach. you like companies involved in drug distribution. a lot of people are suspicious of these companies
6:40 pm
you think it represents great value? >> i do. at the end of the day, the drug distributors provide a service of getting the product safely from point a to b. saving the u.s. healthcare system billions of dollars each year if you try to replicate, look at 2003 and 2004 when there were white papers written about if we change the system and got rid of the drug distributors, what it would mean there were concerns as we saw a change in the reimbursement model. >> i know some were priced for imperfection we have a president, sometimes he -- let's say he can say things that we are shocked at. >> incoming president? >> yes president-elect. owe seems to want to knock out the middleman. isn't that the people you say are cheap? >> what i would say is that i would love to believe that any company would give you a good
6:41 pm
price without having to negotiate. the middlemen negotiate. think of president-elect trump as the biggest negotiator. i think perhaps he doesn't really know exactly what these companies do the models are opaque. understanding what they bring to the system you need to have someone in the middle to be able to negotiate between the manufacturer, between the retailer, be able to provide the level of service needed for the member and all the clinical programs that go around that. people forget about that i would remind you, you are talking about pbms drug distributors are more logistic coordinators. a pharmacy benefit management company is on the drug side. if you look at that, those companies make about just over $2 per script. it's not big dollars >> drug companies like to blame them >> it's easier to blame someone else right? they don't set the price at the owned of the day, we need
6:42 pm
the drug companies we need innovation we have seen innovation with glp-1 and companies trying to figure out, how do we pay for those? how do we sustain what weight loss people have longer term >> if you want to -- if you want to say you have a pill or a once a month shot or something that reduces fat without muscle loss, it's going to be done at your conference >> most likely >> you think news? >> i don't know if we will get news but i would bet over the next several years we will see it move in that direction >> i speak to a number of ceos like you do. no pharma ceo i know was able to get in to see biden. his people said, bad optics to be in the room they don't want you in the room. that's going to change, right? >> i would think so. i would hope that president trump seems to be more business friendly, wanting to make the right decisions. i think if we go back to the
6:43 pm
last administration, he had them at business roundtables. i think that his practices most likely will look similar to the last administration. >> really? that could be. >> could be. >> sometimes he is fiery i did think that i brought this lawsuit -- this is the cvs lawsuit. this is about how they say the pharmacists were encouraged to do the wrong thing for opioids we have walgreens all the way down these stocks are at their 52-week low. i know there's a lot of bad baked in anything good that could be interesting? i'm more interested in finding out new things that could create bargains than i am about saying why they went down. >> let's talk about cvs. there's good opportunities in cvs. the biggest driver was medicare advantage. they had very strong growth in membership for '24 that came at a cost. they lost about $3.3 billion in
6:44 pm
medicare advantage in 2024 in 2025, based on their plan design, they will shed a number of those members number two, they will regain their stars. stars is the program -- >> i'm involved. >> i can't believe that. >> i am. i was checked in the other day. >> look at the stars it will come back for cvs, which will create a tailwind on that side of the business when you look at their pharmacy business, it was pretty good last year. >> it was. >> they beat expectations. they continue to gain market share. closing stores, stores, too my pharmacies. >> my understanding is they closed losing stores management has a good hand is that possible >> that's possible one of the things that everybody cares about in health care is transparency one of the knocks on retail pharmacy and pbms has been transparency cvs has a transparent model that they offered to the marketplace. though put out a press release this week saying the majority of the scripts will be at that cost
6:45 pm
plus >> that would be an interesting opportunity. a lot of people know the brand they know the stock is low you are not that worried about this lawsuit >> i'm not worried about that lawsuit. at the end of the day, we saw it with the drug distributors they settled around the opioid settlement that's where the stocks started to work. when you think about cvs, it's a small piece of their business. they have good cash flow i think at the end of the day, it's something they will have to work through i feel good about cvs going into next year. >> i like your approach. there's a lot of value there i can't wait to see you at the conference i think there will be more news, because i think there's companies that have to do things they are down so much. >> maybe >> all right that's lisa gill, jp morgan's head of equity research. this is as good a preview you will get next week is so exciting i can't wait to go to your
6:46 pm
conference thank you. >> can't wait to see you there. >> coming up, cramer takes your calls. the sky is the limit it's a fast fire lightning round next ♪♪ ♪♪ ♪♪ ♪♪ ♪♪ ♪♪ at state street, we know everyone's trying to get somewhere. ♪♪ take the next step toward your future, by investing in the s&p 500 with spy. getting there starts here.
6:49 pm
6:50 pm
>> caller: good evening. i hope you have a great day. >> yeah. >> caller: my focus question for you tonight is on pfizer pharmaceuticals pfe. >> too low to sell that's all i can say i don't want you to sell if you have it. let the dividend do its job. >> caller: how are you >> i'm good. how about you? >> caller: i'm good. thank you for being great. you are doing a marvellous job >> we are going to revert to -- if you want robotics, here is what you will get. you will get nvidia. that's it. nobody else. let's go to ed in illinois >> caller: a true aestro of wall
6:51 pm
street >> what's up >> caller: disappointing news on a wonder drug. is the long-term positive outlook intact >> i have to tell you, ed, i was disappointed on that i was praying they would have something that wouldn't be addictive. it's not working i would not -- it reflects the other great drugs they have. nothing good on that drug. i don't see upside that was the drug of the future. thanks for the call. lisa in north carolina >> caller: thanks for taking my call >> thanks for calling. what's up? >> caller: i'm calling about qx. >> yeah. i don't want to be too negative. i have had it with quantumscape.
6:52 pm
i don't think they have the horses i would be a seller even right at this level. have to say it let's go to randy in ohio. >> caller: i got two quick questions. i want to know about powl industries. >> it's unbelievable how badly -- i did not see that coming i think that i have to do more work on them, because it's a big, big disappointment. that, ladies and gentlemen, is the conclusion of the lightning round. >> sponsored by charles schwab coming up, how should snack food makers be preparing for the influence of glp drugs cramer is giving you his take next
6:53 pm
knock, knock. #1 broker here for the #1 hit maker. thanks for swingin' by, carl. no problem. so, what are all of those for? ah, this one lets me adjust the bass. add more guitar. maybe some drums. wow, so many choices. yeah. like schwab. i can get full-service wealth management, advice, invest on my own, and trade on thinkorswim. you know carl is the only frontman you need... oh i gotta take this carl, it's schwab. ♪ schwaaaab! ♪ have a choice in how you invest with schwab. ♪♪ only servicenow connects every corner of your business, putting ai to work for people. pfft ... every corner?
6:54 pm
every corner, nick. ow! so kate in hr ... hey kate. can focus on people, not process. oh actually, i have a question ... keep up, nick. do you have to be sick to take a sick day? patty in it is using ai agents to deal with the small stuff, so she can work on the big stuff. agents like secret agents? secret agents i control. with your mind? you know ... i played a secret agent once. - we know. - oh gosh ... i liked it. over here, ai gives tina the info she needs to get the job done. nick, what did we say about touching? no touching. good. ai helps jim solve customer problems before they're problems. for reals? for reals. for reals. servicenow is the only platform that connects every corner of your business, putting ai to work for people. oh, so we all work better, together! my work here is done. excuse me, which way back? uh, follow him.
6:56 pm
practically every day we see more research why the food and beverage stocks are going down we heard they are hurt by the glp-1 zones. foods are designed to be craved. what if the drugs stole your craving? we heard lay's tell us, bet you can't eat just one we hear a new generation believes their bodies are temples. they won't eat anything processed. junk food isn't selling as well
6:57 pm
as it used to. we know three other things first, no food or beverage company is willing to say their earnings are hurt or compromised by glp-1 no company is willing to accept there are changes in the way young people consume food and drink, else alcohol which they have turned on their dividends, a trampoline, are marginal in an era where the 30-year treasury yields more than 4.9%, highest since 2007. that's devastating for the dividend paying packaged food stocks denial is a river that runs through the grocery store aisles the ceos have to get realistic they have to assume the glp-1s will be more popular given the diabetic shots work for more than two categories. you think people will stop
6:58 pm
because they don't want to give themselves a shot? how about if you give yourself a shot once a month instead of once a week? how about pill form? people losing too much muscle? the industry will come up with one that only attacks fat. in other words, the food and beverage business has to get realistic. they have to realize they will sell less food they need to merge finally, i think the food and beverage stocks have to slash prices they have to stop the revulsion when we look at prices liquor is up too much. you read about all the bad things liquor can do, they can't hold price they have to find a new way to tempt you with profit. value. snacks, too expensive. we need value. processed food prices should be cut to keep loyalty.
6:59 pm
that's what the stocks are saying look at mcdonald's, it stopped going down when they rolled out the $5 meal. the packaged food companies need to accept they need to make money for the shareholders, even if it means selling themselves to each other. how can the food ceos believe what they are saying do they watch the same things you and i do until i see a food exec say we need to reset expectations and cut prices and estimates to the analysts, their stocks will keep experiencing this endless slow motion decline how can they not see this? there's nothing wrong with resetting expectations your stocks will get killed for day two or three it's true. unless you hold the chart upside down, it's telling youu
7:00 pm
have to do slash prices slash estimates. merge and start all over again it's the only way to get out of this jam they never saw coming and refuse to acknowledge when everyone else knows what's happening. there's always a bull market somewhere. i will find it here for you on "mad money." i'm jim cramer see you next time. i love this space. it's super hot right now in silicon valley. [ new york accent ] who wants to sell some meat, or do i gotta break some knees around here? let's go! this is, like, next-level science. i've hired the top minds to make this a reality. the future of fitness is... how big is the bankruptcy market in the u.s.? -[ laughs ] -it's really, really big. if you want him to match my deal and you would pick him, that you will regret forever. [ thunder rumbles ] yeah, baby. whoo! -- captions by vitac -- ♪♪ narrator: first in the tank is what the entrepreneur believes is cutting-edge healthcare for your loved ones.
0 Views
IN COLLECTIONS
CNBC Television Archive Television Archive News Search ServiceUploaded by TV Archive on