>> as i said a new position for us relatively small cap health care name, but we think has a lot of growth in front of it. >> joe t. >> a few weeks ago, i gave applovin as a final trade. a little bit of an update here. i think it's about to take out. it's december all time high for 17. >> thank you very much. thanks, everybody. see you on closing bell. >> and thank you very much, scott. welcome to the exchange. on this monday to kick off a busy week, i'm kelly evans, the president expected to announce new tariffs on all steel and aluminum imports into the u.s. that should come this hour. any minute really would make it harder for overseas companies to sell lower priced steel in the us markets. and that's why the us makers are on the move. take a look at cleveland-cliffs united steel and new car nucor all shooting higher. cleveland-cliffs is up 18% now. we'll talk to one of the biggest players in the industry. he's had to close two of his plants

in recent years. he says these tariffs can't come fast enough and will explain why ahead. but let's begin with the other big breaking story out of washington that all kicked off with a post from elon musk on x late friday afternoon saying cfpb, r.i.p. then came the directives to cfpb employees to stay home. we're talking about the consumer financial protection bureau. they were asked to stand down from all work. interim director russell vought, who's director of the omb, telling workers in an email on saturday to cease all supervision and examination activity and pause enforcement actions. that was followed up with a memo from the cfpb's chief operating officer yesterday, informing staff to stay home. with the office closed through the end of the week. today, an error message greeting visitors on the organization's landing page. let's talk about all of it with the man who was in charge of the cfpb until a few days ago. joining us now in his first tv interview since having effectively been fired by the president, i hate to put it that

way. rohit is former cfpb director rohit chopra. welcome and thank you for joining us. >> thanks so much. >> for having me. >> are you employed right now? >> i'm not. it's been just a. >> few days since. i wrapped up my time. >> as head of the cfpb. >> and really what was in flight was a lot of big investigations over large companies, banks non-banks big tech companies who we thought might be breaking the law. so the news about really law enforcement being told to stand down, i'm really worried that this is just not going to be fair for all those mortgage lenders and banks and others who are following the law and are going to have to compete with those who just think they're above the law. >> so was this a surprise? i mean, we've known for years now, and people have been unhappy with the creation of the cfpb. this goes back to the financial crisis. it was created in the wake in 2010, i believe, and it

was basically funded through the federal reserve or held accountable through the federal reserve. in other words, not through congress and not through the people's power of the purse. was that original sin why we ended up in this situation today? >> well, actually, every single federal banking regulator is funded through a dedicated funding system. and part of the reason why was to limit some of the political interference. now, look, at the end of the day, we should want to make sure that the cfpb is actually a strong cop on the beat because there was no agency focused on some of this. that's part of the reason we had a subprime mortgage meltdown. so i'm not really sure it makes sense to want to just put away a cfpb. it seems like you're almost baiting another crisis. >> that may be the case. but again, going back to whether there's other agencies that can or should be doing this work, what would you say were the most

consequential actions taken by the cfpb in its 1415 year history? >> well, certainly, we have uncovered over the years some major meltdowns and scandals, including the wells fargo fake account scandal, the return of billions of dollars of people who had been defrauded, but also some of the real plumbing of the financial system, making sure that data is protected, making sure that credit reports are accurate. these are things that are not controversial anywhere except for in washington, and perhaps by those on wall street and silicon valley who don't necessarily want to play by the same rules as main street banks and lenders. we have to make sure there is meaningful oversight, and we know that large tech companies are eager to get into payments and banking. it's one of the reasons why the cfpb has put more focus on how they handle data and

payments, to make sure there isn't errors and fraud and surveillance. and, you know, we'll see how this plays out. but at the end of the day, the work of the cfpb has been welcomed by people no matter what their political stripes are. >> you mentioned some active work that's ongoing, which agencies or which parts of the government are likely to pick up if they pick up, where where would that go? you know, agencies like the sec, i mean, there's plenty of existing ones. >> the question good question. the law gives exclusive enforcement authority on so many of these laws to the cfpb. so if there is nobody enforcing at the federal level, it is really unclear how this is going to work. and we lived that before in the in the years leading up to the financial crisis, there was no one really responsible, especially for those companies that were not chartered as banks in the mortgage market, payday lending and others. so i don't

know. i really don't know who would do it, because the law that congress has passed has assigned to the cfpb that oversight work. >> just 1 or 2 more questions, one of which is, and we've seen this with some of the other diktats that have come out so far, the courts have halted them. and i understand that there was a lawsuit sunday filed, you know, by the treasury employees union that represents cfpb staff, saying that these actions by vote could be unconstitutional, which is why i was curious, if you consider yourself fired or merely kind of working from home. >> well, look, no, i was i'm no longer employed by the cfpb. and as i said on this network many times, i was happy to pass the baton to whoever was chosen. but i also believe that if you really care about lowering costs, about making sure that everybody can achieve the dream of getting a mortgage and buying a home, you really need a marketplace that is not set up

to exploit. you need one that's fair and competitive. and that's exactly what i think you want the cfpb to be working on. you also want the cfpb protecting people's data from intrusions by data, you know, data brokers, credit reporting agencies and so much more. so again, i am really i think the country would be worse off if we just defunded all the police over wall street and silicon valley that are really handling our money, our loans and our payments. >> right. although again, there are other agencies that oversee a lot of pieces of this, which. >> well, you keep saying that, but i think the issue is that there are laws that are specifically assigned for enforcement for the cfpb. the cfpb does not regulate securities, right? you know, it does not regulate the trading of commodities. but when it comes to consumer financial products, that's the agency that takes the lead. >> so let's take credit cards for example, which is an issue

that the president himself, senator sanders, have said, you know, we'd be better off capping rates at 10%. and most people think that's a pipe dream. is that something the cfpb would have oversight of, or where would that fall? just typical legislation does. >> does enforce on the credit card act, doesn't have the power to set rates like that, though over the past few years, we really have uncovered lots of abuses when it comes to fee churning and other practices in the credit card industry. but yes, you know, that proposal that is one that the president has said he supports and others do as well. americans are paying over $100 billion in credit card interest, and the interest rates have gone up far further than even the fed has raised rates. there's real issues about whether that market is competitive and whether it's observing fair practices. so, you know, we'll see if that does become a legislative proposal. but even if it was passed into law, who on earth will enforce

it? if there is really no one at the cfpb doing their job? >> i guess, you know, you break the law, you break the law. so someone someone would, i would imagine is going to hold you accountable. >> well, actually, who will do that? what what when we have laws we need them enforced. sometimes laws provide for individuals to take take companies to court, but many of them do not. and it requires law enforcement to be able to look at the whole picture, look at all the facts and go to court. you know, the cfpb has done that routinely. it doesn't always win, but it makes sure that it is watching so that consumers are not routinely cheated. and that really is a very important part of a of a market here in the us. >> so for the and remind me how many employees there are at the agency, what is their status right now, especially with this possible lawsuit in the works to stop this action from taking

place? >> well, there's about 1700 employees. i don't know the latest. my understanding from media coverage is that they're really not supposed to be doing any work. that means those law enforcement investigations. that means that oversight of banks and other financial companies, the handling of consumer complaints. and i think i'm already getting calls from some in industry worried about this because it could be chaotic. you know, the mortgage industry, for example, relies on some of the rules and guidelines that are issued by the cfpb when it comes to making sure that the mortgage market is working. so i don't know what is going on, but i don't think anyone on wall street should even want to see this kind of chaos or a situation where bad actors who are egregiously violating the law can do so with impunity. >> super interesting. rohit, i want to thank you again for

joining us to explain, to the extent that you can, the events that are taking place. extraordinary, really, for those of us who remember when this was created, to see what's come now full circle, thanks for taking the time. >> great to see you. >> rohit chopra, formerly of the cfpb and shuttering that agency, is just one of many caught in the path of president trump's war on government waste. my next guest says american exceptionalism is peaking and preparing to go join japanese from 1990 and chinese exceptionalism from 2010. in the tank. that's some strong words from bill smead. he's the chief investment officer at smead capital management. so, bill, i mean, i think of you as a real patriot. and this is quite a word of caution from you. >> well. >> yes, the. >> people are. >> confusing political improvements with an effort to extend a euphoria that charlie munger called the. >> biggest of his career because. >> of the totality of it. see, this is euphoria. >> we put. >> out a piece right. >> after the election, euphoria

of the first couple of days. >> and if you look, i think the s&p is lower than it. >> was a. >> couple of days after the election day euphoria. and that's. because go back to 1980, ronald reagan was the was going to be great for business. and paul volcker did what he had to do to break the back of inflation with 18% 90 day t-bills. while reagan stood down the air traffic controllers, psychologically breaking inflation. but despite that, the market went down 22% over the first 21 months of his term. and that's with record low participation in stocks, stocks that went from seven and a half times earnings on average to six. and we've started out this with the with the most expensive market, as measured by 7 or 8 main ways of measuring like buffett's gdp to market. >> so let me just back up for a second bill. i mean, do you do

you we're all trying to figure out is what does this mean? let's just say for the s&p 500 for investing in the stock market. you know, i see some making the argument that as these government jobs are trimmed, that will make the us economy more productive in the long run. for example, that doesn't sound like the argument you're making. you see this as more how do you expect this all to play out exactly? >> no, no. the argument involved, it has to do with the economy, the on the ground economy. and people have to understand that from 1964 to 1981, the on the ground economy did great and stocks did terrible. they've got to realize. >> a lot of inflation during that period. i don't know if they'd say it was doing great. >> well, think about it like this. we went all the way to one quarter percent interest rates from 18% t-bills in a 40 year stretch. of course, people bid the price of common stocks up in

reaction to that, that the future income stream got more valuable as the riskless rate went down, the riskless rate is no longer going down and people are ignoring it and continuing to bid up very exciting stocks that are the last major trend, which was technology. reggie fang, then magnificent seven and now i and that is the last trend. they're bidding that up even though even though we're at the point where in prior historical circumstances where a very legitimate development came to pass, you had to start getting away from it. and so it to me, it's very bizarre that the riskless rate is going up, despite the fed cutting rates for a while, and people continue to capitalize tech and growth and quality wide moat 35 times earnings stocks and putting 60

times earnings on costco like they did coca-cola in 1972. >> well, let's talk about some of the names that you think are much more attractively valued. and amex, you know, lennar, horton, simon properties. >> well, simon, the simon family is basically the berkshire hathaway of real estate. and they have done a fantastic job for us. remember five years ago, kelly, in the middle of the covid closures, no one was going to want to shop. well, that's been changed now to no one's going to want to shop in downtown large cities, but people like to shop. we found out that 60% of the stuff is going to get shopped for. but but more important, you hear all these people talking about nuclear and data centers and all this kind of thing. natural gas is how we make electricity. and that's the largest source of electricity in the united states is natural gas. and that's a

natural byproduct of providing oil and gas. and those stocks are just cheap as all get out. they're hated and vilified, left over from the religion called esg. and they're so afraid that trump is going to ruin them the way that drill, baby drill did back in the 2016 time period. >> that said, apa does have a 5%. but let me just ask you this bill for the for the kinds of industries, the sectors that you like, are tariffs a threat or an opportunity? >> it the tariffs i'm a my economics major taught us that david ricardo and comparative value if someone can make something better and less expensive than you, go do something else and let that other country produce it. so that's that's just my natural philosophy from the way i was educated. and so i believe that it will be inflationary. i

believe that when ups cuts their amazon deliveries in half, because the usps is going to charge $5.35 for the last mile versus $3.10, that's inflationary. that's a 60% increase in price. when the dockworkers get 8.5% per year, compounded for six years when the machinists at boeing get 8.5%. and then you throw and then you throw tariffs in on top of it. it can't help but be inflationary. but the only way you can stop this inflation would be to retract the $12 trillion of federal government monetized debt. and it's almost impossible to do that at this stage. >> well we'll see. i know they're trying to chip away here and there, maybe revalue the gold holdings. bill, thanks very much. appreciate your time today. bill smead with smead capital management. we've got some more breaking news out of the white house. let's get to eamon javers. eamon, what's the latest? >> kelly we're. >> about to see president trump in the oval office have called the white house press pool here to go in. so we'll see that

momentarily. i'm told that what we're going to see here is the president officially signing those steel and aluminum tariffs that he talked about yesterday, 25% across the board tariff on steel and aluminum. what we're not going to see, at least at this time, is the reciprocal tariffs that he'd also talked about on countries that have tariffs against the united states. that set of tariffs is going on a separate track, i'm told. not clear whether that's later today or later this week. but we're not going to see that at this event that's coming up here in a short amount of time. we're also going to see kelly, the president, signing an executive order related to the foreign corrupt practices act, according to a white house official. now that's important. that's the law that makes it illegal for american companies to bribe foreign officials overseas. what president trump is going to sign, i'm told, is an executive order that pauses enforcement of that by the department of justice and the attorney general until they can issue new guidance about how

they're going to enforce the fcpa, the foreign corrupt practices act, going forward. now, the exact wording of that is going to be important. critics will immediately suggest that this is president trump trying to loosen up rules to allow american companies to bribe officials overseas. the details of this will be important because american businesses have complained for a long time that the fcpa and enforcement of it makes it impossible for american companies to compete, particularly in the oil and gas sectors, infrastructure, construction and other businesses that do business with foreign governments and in foreign countries around the world. so we'll look to see what the exact language is. i'm told what to expect is a pause in enforcement of the fcpa until they can work out new enforcement guidelines for the department of justice relative to american companies that are engaged in alleged bribery of foreign governments overseas.

kelly. so a lot coming up here, and we'll see the president here in just a couple of minutes. >> yeah. but to your point, it sounds like the business community, eamon was saying that it was somewhat vague and confusing sometimes to comply or that the costs outweighed the perceived benefits. >> yeah. i mean, the biggest complaint from the business community for years about fcpa has been that it makes it difficult to compete, right, with western governments around the world that don't have an fcpa equivalent. u.s. companies simply can't operate in some of the places where culturally, it's deemed necessary to make certain payments and the like in order to win business, to hire people who are politically well connected, that sort of thing. that's something that u.s. businesses generally have wanted to have lifted, you know, but reformers and good government folks have said for years, look, what the fcpa does is it makes the united states a leader in global anti-corruption, the idea being that the united states can use its massive economic capacity to set the terms for the rest of the world, saying,

we don't believe that bribery of government officials is a good practice and we're not going to do it. and that might cost us some business on the margins, but that's going to set the tone for the world. this administration now reevaluating the terms of that deal, altering the terms to suggest that they're going to have a pause now in enforcement. >> yeah. interesting to see enacted in 1977 was dormant for a while in terms of enforcement until the bush, bush and obama administrations, which started collecting more revenue from it. and again, so many different interesting developments to follow. we appreciate you bringing all this to us. we'll we'll let you go for now. eamon javers at the white house this afternoon. still to come powell is heading to capitol hill tomorrow for the first time since july to testify before the senate banking committee. our economist says he's not quite ready to join the camp forecasting zero cuts this year. we'll ask what he's expecting powell to tell lawmakers next. plus, as mentioned, president trump announcing plans to impose a 25% blanket tariff on steel and aluminum imports. that's boosting shares of american producers today, cleveland-cliffs by almost 20%.

we'll ask north america's largest steel tube and pipe manufacturer what it will mean for his business and for his consumer. prices ahead. stay with us on the exchange. >> this is the exchange on cnbc. >> nothing stands still. not technology, not. >> the market, and not franklin templeton. >> we've been a firm in motion for over 75 years, always innovating. >> today we're a. >> leader in public. and private markets, digital assets and custom tax management, empowering. >> advisors with. >> solutions to. >> build the. >> portfolios of the future. >> portfolios of the future. >> today. it all started with a small business idea. it's a pillow with a speaker in it! that's right craig. pulling in the perfect team to get the job done. i'm just here for the internets. at&t, it's super-fast! you locked us out?! and when thrown a curveball...

arrggghh! ahhhh! [crashing sounds] we had everything we needed. is the internet out? don't worry, we have at&t internet back-up. the next level network for small business. ♪♪ i sold a pillow! a lot of the revenue streams are guaranteed. >> the countdown is on. cnbc sport official nba team valuations revealed friday in squawk box weeknights. >> if the. >> market is. >> becoming more skeptical about. these types of massive ai investments, and even punishing companies that commit to that type of spending, then maybe the hyperscalers will start dialing back their hardware i feeling under the weather after the big game? you need a dose of comedy. or a feel-good movie. maybe some reality tv. at xfinity we know what we need for sick monday. extra-strength wifi built for streaming, so you can make the most of your “sick” monday.

stream all day with xfinity streamsaver. get netflix, apple tv+, and peacock for just $15 a month. and learn how xfinity rewards members can get a food delivery gift card when they add streamsaver. bring on the good stuff. amazing and is something that we get to use every day. >> welcome back to the exchange. will we get any more fed rate cuts this year after that strong jobs report friday and the spike in inflation expectations? a lot

of economists are starting to think no, but my next guest isn't ready to go that far. here to explain what he sees differently about inflation, as michael darda, the chief economist and macro strategist at roth capital partners. it's good to see you, mike. and you know, i to me it feels a little bit like some of the inflation is cost push and some of it's idiosyncratic. and but it all seems to be sticking around, you know longer than we had hoped. so i'm curious how you would explain kind of the broader trends that you see. >> well, kelly, i think we've made a lot. >> of progress. >> and i think that's what. >> powell is. >> going to say this week. >> if you go back two years. >> we were 350 basis points. >> above the fed's target. >> on pce inflation. >> now we're. >> 60 to. >> 80 basis. >> points above on a year. >> to year basis. and if you just look at the monthly figures core pce inflation annualized at 2% or less in six out of the last eight months. so i think that's a pretty good track

record in the sense that the fed was able to do this. and avoid what typically happens, which is a recession and a big stock market crash. so, you know, i think you have to give them credit. i was skeptical that they'd be able to pull this off. they're pulling it off. i think what powell is going to say is the economy is held up better than expected. we've taken the short rates down 100 basis points. we're just going to sort of see what happens from here. and i think it's completely premature. i mean, it's february 10th. no one knows what the situation is going to look like in the fall of this year or in december. so i just think it's a little early to say, okay, you know, all further rate cuts for the year completely off the table. the market's only pricing in about a cut and a half now. so you know we'll see. the fed i think is going to retain a lot of flexibility here. >> are you surprised that that consumers seem as aware as they are about tariffs. you probably saw that data from friday inflation expectations. you know a quarter a third of respondents cited tariffs as a reason why

they think prices are going to be higher. we've seen a lot of pull forward in demand. so i'm curious how that's all going to work through. >> yeah, i'm a little skeptical of some of these surveys. with the university of michigan data. there could be some political biases, and it wouldn't be the first time that we've seen that. so these sudden spikes tend to either be revised away or reversed. we got some data out of the new york fed today on inflation expectations that looked much better behaved. so you know, now look, the bond market inflation expectations have moved up pretty considerably since the fall of last year. but they were rolling over hard going into the fall of last year. it looked like the labor market was losing steam rapidly. so the fed's rate cuts reversed that. and at least if you look at the ten year horizon for the tips market, 240 basis points that you know, that's a good level. that's consistent with price stability. so that means the fed is doing it right. we shouldn't worry so much about

you know, whether there's stability in short term interest rates. really what we want is nominal stability in terms of nominal spending and inflation over time. that's the fed's task not to just keep the short rate fixed at some level and then have the business cycle go off the rails. so they're basically getting it right here. i hope that can continue. >> and what's interesting, mike, is i think you are like, you know, other voices we've spoken to recently. you have more of a bias towards value, towards some of the health care stocks, towards the small caps kind of staying away from the s&p 500 and its dominance with the mag mag seven. but if the fed ends up looking at this and saying we see job growth slow or, you know, what have you, like you said, but they see stickiness in prices because of tariffs and they don't cut rates more. then wouldn't that be a broader risk to the economy? wouldn't that be a risk to things like value in small caps? >> oh no doubt. i think anything cyclical, if the economy stumbles or if the fed has difficulty in tracking the neutral rate because of these supply side crosscurrents,

that's probably the bigger risk. and i think, you know, anything that is hitched to the business cycle could end up not performing particularly well. but if we go back to the late 90s, early 2000, the last time we were in a frenzy driven by the technology sector with super high valuations, we saw a seven year period of outperformance for small cap value stocks. in the wake of that, including through a recession period and nearly a three year bear market for the s&p 500. and so, in my view, this is an area i think that as long as we're committed to a multiyear horizon, which individual investors should be doing, they shouldn't be day trading, in my opinion. yeah, i think, you know, i think it makes a lot of sense. >> i even heard about it. he wasn't advocating, but just pointing out the outperformance, which bernstein said, look at the european small cap value space when that's outperforming, which it has this month, the past month or so, you know, things have changed. mike, thanks so much. it's good to

check in with you. we appreciate it. >> thank you. >> michael darda with roth capital partners. coming up, the chip stocks haven't fully recovered from last month's deep sea induced selloff. and now openai is reportedly close to developing its own first custom ai chip. is it another headache for the semi stocks or just a head fake? we'll talk about that next. >> individually. >> each of us is great. >> but from. >> here you can see. >> we're one big. >> team at atlassian. we believe real progress takes. >> all of. >> us working together on new sources of. >> energy. >> cars that drive to the future, even pizza deliveries. together, we can go beyond where we've ever been collaborating from anywhere on everything. atlassian makes software for teams to do what is impossible alone. >> it's an absolute problem. >> it happens all of the time. if you own property, you've got equity. you can be a victim. >> how can a scammer actually.

steal my home? >> it's so easy for them to get the original document. >> they can download. >> it and forge it. >> they begin to take. >> out. >> loans and. >> you're left holding the bag. >> what can i do to protect. >> my title? >> go to. home title act.com. >> we monitor. >> your title and alert you. >> if anything. >> disturbs your title. >> protect your home. >> you'll sleep better that night. >> most power players on wall street rate nvidia a strong buy today. yet why are so many legendary investors quietly ignoring that advice and instead selling the stock hand over fist? every billionaire on your screen has recently sold nvidia. some have offloaded millions of shares, in fact. hedge funds are quietly selling all of their tech stocks at the fastest rate we've seen since 2016. my name is mark chaikin. during my 50 years on wall street, i helped build three indexes for the nasdaq. that means i know how to recognize these signals from the tech market, and exactly what

they mean for you and your money. i explain everything in my new free market briefing, including the truth about what's going on with nvidia today and the specific stock i recommend you buy instead. simply visit the website below to get the details 100% free. >> i love rise mushroom coffee and not just. >> because i look. >> good drinking it. >> hello there! >> the all day energy i get is. good too, and it's easy on the stomach, but mostly. >> it's. >> because i look. >> good drinking it. >> you found it then?

>> of course i did. >> good boy. >> welcome back to the exchange. >> i'm bertha. coombs with your. cnbc news update. president trump says palestinians would not be allowed to. return to. >> gaza under his. >> plan for us ownership of the territory. >> according to. >> a clip released today of an interview with fox news. the president's assertion contradicts statements last week from both secretary of state marco rubio and. white house press secretary karine leavitt, who said the relocation would only be temporary. arab nations, including us allies egypt and jordan, have sharply criticized the entire proposal. the head of the office of special counsel, a federal agency that looks to protect whistleblowers, is suing president trump, saying he was illegally fired. hampton dellinger argues in the suit that he can only be removed for

inefficiency, neglect of duty or malfeasance in office, and sony is giving playstation plus members five extra days of service following a network outage this weekend. the company said the playstation network had fully recovered as of sunday from an operational issue. players had issues with logging into their accounts, visiting the playstation store and launching online games. hopefully, it was back by the second half of the super bowl. a lot of people turned away. >> good point bertha. thank you very much. bertha coombs first chatgpt came along and disrupted the entire internet's business model. now its owner, openai, is looking to disrupt the semiconductor space as well. the company, according to reuters, is getting closer to creating its own in-house custom ai chip. deirdre bosa has more in today's tech check. deirdre. >> hey, kelly. so this is really a strategic move designed to give openai more choice for training and running their ai models and reduce their reliance on nvidia. but reading between

the lines, this may have just as much to do with its evolving and increasingly complicated relationship with microsoft. when project stargate was announced earlier this year, openai and microsoft, they tweaked their agreement. microsoft was no longer the exclusive cloud provider to openai, but it moved to a model where microsoft has a right of first refusal for a cloud computing hosting. so even though microsoft now allows openai to negotiate with other cloud vendors like aws or google cloud, those companies have no incentive to give openai a good price. microsoft will just match it. negotiations over cloud contracts. they are fierce and time consuming. as one source i spoke to put it, negotiating with a company that has a right of first refusal contract with microsoft, that is a waste of time for the others. so openai developing its own custom chips may be one step toward untangling its microsoft relationship. project. stargate. masa san. softbank. oracle. three more factors that could give openai even more leverage in its ai infrastructure future.

now, it also just speaks to these shifting dynamics in the ai landscape. kelly, where models themselves are being commoditized and the real moat is infrastructure and distribution. and certainly openai has its eye on those two pieces. over the weekend, sam altman posting about where they are, according to similarweb, in terms of most visited website, i believe it's 5 or 6. no surprise google has the top with search and youtube and then it's the meta properties. >> i'm getting more and more used to using that. kind of like the i tried to ask it last night, name the last ten super bowl halftime shows, but i was googling it and then i had to open a web page, and the web page wasn't helpful. and i was like, ai is better ai. does this better. >> give you the answer right away? >> i didn't actually go and use it because then i was like, i did it, but i liked the super bowl ad. deirdre, thanks for now. we appreciate it. deirdre bosa. still to come, the steel prices spiking to a ten month high as the president announces plans to impose a 25% tariff on imported steel and aluminum. american producers are getting a

boost today. but what will it mean for us manufacturers? we'll ask the ceo of zekelman industries about that next. >> techcheck is sponsored by >> techcheck is sponsored by comcast [ car engine revving ] when i started walton goggins goggle glasses, i had no idea what i was doing. but godaddy airo does. using ai to build a logo, website and social content. so i can let the world know, if your goggles ain't goggins, they don't belong on your noggins!

fraction of the cost. whether it's fueling meme coin mania or building infrastructure for high frequency trading networks on wall street, developers are choosing the solana network. and now osprey brings you a tradable ticker for solana osol. don't let solana fly by. you can start investing in it right from your brokerage account or ira. osprey funds your trusted guide to select crypto. >> hi. >> i'm kevin chung and i'm the chief strategy officer at ryder. companies like mine are proof that an ai powered future is already here. and if you want to experience. experience. the great barrier reef.

huh? here we are. oooh. — g'day. — uh, where am i? australia! and you look like you need a vacation. show us what ya got. (♪♪) remarkable. yep! it's amazing. i love it! — what is it? — a wombat. come on! (♪♪) jump! down under, g'day is the start of every good adventure. so, what are you waiting for? come and say g'day. (♪♪) >> it looks like what you want it to look like. it looks like your investment made sense. >> every day. >> i'm reading extensively. >> i'm checking. >> the markets. >> throughout the. >> trading session. >> working the phones, talking to sources. >> and doing. >> my own reporting to share insights. >> information. >> and all of the details.

>> that you need. >> to be able to make money. >> welcome back. the white house is expected to announce a blanket 25% tariff on all u.s. imports of steel and aluminum. it's unclear exactly when it would go into effect, but shares of the u.s. aluminum and steel producers are popping on the news, as are steel prices, by the way. but cleveland-cliffs a good barometer, up 18% today. my next guest says these additional tariffs can't come soon enough, as he's had to close two plants here in recent years. joining us for more is barry zekelman, the chair and ceo of zekelman industries. it's the largest independent steel pipe and tube manufacturer in north america. and i don't know anything about steel pipe and tube, barry. so please try to, like, break this down for me. what has been happening? we've we've had a lot of these tariffs going back to the first trump administration. they've been in place for a long time. what has been happening to your business. >> yeah i mean tariffs go back. >> a long way. but what's. >> happened is you know president trump put in 232 tariffs on aluminum and steel. he negotiated with certain countries to back down those

tariffs and put in place kind of. a quote unquote quota system if you will. and they'd agree to limited imports. but what's happened is a lot of those countries have violated those agreements. i mean, mexico in particular with us, i mean, their their imports of steel conduit have gone up eight and nine fold, you know, decimating our industry, taking it from 2% market share to 20% market share. so, you know there are targeted tariffs that need to happen. i think, you know, president trump putting in a trade policy like this is trying to get the conversation going. but more importantly, it's not just about tariffs on steel and aluminum that the producers make per se. i think we have to look further down the value chain. you know, the whole supply chain and what this product goes into. u.s. steel cleveland-cliffs, nucor sdi all sell me steel. but they wouldn't be in business without me. so you have to look at the consumer of this product. and then what we compete against. and we compete against products that are using steel from the likes of china and

india and other countries like this, shipping them in through the trade back door if you will, like mexico, and then taking over our markets with dumped products. so they're circumventing other dumping duties that are already on the steel, transforming it into another product and quote unquote changing the country of origin and, and a substantial transformation and otherwise coming in under the guise of these trade agreements, all at the expense of our communities, our workers, and, and our business. and we can't invest something. >> like that. so our guest at the top of the hour made a point that i think a lot of people themselves learned in school or are curious about, which is to say, you know, if someone if mexico, china, others are going to dump cheaper steel into the global marketplace and other players can use that steel to make things more cheaply that ultimately compete with u.s. goods in the global marketplace, then if we tariff what's happening here in order to

protect our industries, are we just going to end up losing in the global export race? >> no, i mean, i mean, it's an easy argument to make because it's not that sophisticated. it's okay, we're going to put a tax on it or a tariff, and it's going to cost more. and the consumers will will have trouble. it's actually the other way around. look what happens when you take product out of making it in america. you take jobs away from americans. you take capital investment away. the last time 232 were put in the u.s. steel industry announced $30 billion of investment here in the most efficient and modern steel mills in the world. i've invested over $1 billion in my company, in plants, you know, becoming way more efficient. we're the most efficient two producer in the world, but the product that we buy to make our steel of is 80% of the cost that goes in. so when you have that as dumped product as the substrate, then countries can target you, annihilate an industry and then they own it. >> no, absolutely. and we've

seen this time and again i have so many more questions. let me try to ask you just the most important ones. i don't know if you caught the 60 minutes report, the interview with robert lighthizer a couple of weeks back, but they actually used steel tariffs as an example. and i don't know where this research comes from. i tried to find if it was peterson or something similar. they said the steel tariffs back then protected a few thousand jobs in the steel industry, but cost 75,000 other jobs in other industries that use these inputs and were therefore paying higher prices couldn't produce jobs over. can you comment on that phenomenon that researchers are pointing to and saying, okay, whatever you tariff might help that industry, but what happens to the broader customer base? >> well. >> i can absolutely comment to that. exactly what i said earlier. we didn't go far enough, far enough down the value chain. so, you know, when those jobs then leave america and go to mexico to be made with cheaper labor and no environmental controls, and then other steel that comes in from around the world, from the likes of russia and china, circumventing duties. they take

jobs away from america. so we didn't go far enough. and that's the problem. yeah. i mean, no question. why does general motors pick up and go to mexico from from here in the u.s? i mean, for the weather, they went there because the labor is cheaper, the taxes are cheaper, there's less environmental regulation. these tariffs don't. >> go far enough. bury these these new this new 25% blanket tariff. does that go far enough? >> not at all. >> no. >> what would i think? we need to go way further down the value chain. i'll give you a specific example. we all know what a hydraulic cylinder is that moves. some of us moves a blade on a well. like if you look at a bulldozer or a caterpillar machine, that shiny piece of steel that moves in and out, that cylinder is made here and assembled here with lots of high value jobs and many parts that go into it. so what happens now is you tariff the steel so that i make the hydraulic the main cylinder. from now they've moved

that manufacturing to mexico. they bring in the cylinder from india or china. they bring in the bearings from china. they assemble it there with very cheap labor, and they ship the whole cylinder in. so you took away all of those jobs from, from the us. >> what fixes. >> that need to go downstream and tariff those products as well and provide jobs for the communities here? cheap is expensive. when you move a product out of the us and make it somewhere else, you're losing the tax dollars that we pay on the income tax on the income. >> just to be clear. so if i if what would be the verbiage if they're tariff ing steel, but you're using the example you described, what else should be tariff in order to get at that whole value chain? >> well, i think that products are that heavily, heavily use of steel. right. maybe it's by a kilogram weight. maybe it's by the percentage of steel that's in it. i think they need to go way down the value chain. i mean, look at a car, right? a car has a ton of steel in it. so you just showed steel prices that went up 100 or $150 a ton

in the future. so are you telling me that consumers aren't going to buy a car because it cost $100 more? so last. >> question, barry. >> incentives on cars of two, three, $4,000. >> absolutely. one more. just because i highly relevant as a customer then of u.s. steel as you mentioned. would you have any problem with nippon buying that? i mean, do you perceive that that company needs to be modernized? do they now that there's maybe just going to be an investment? what's what's your view on that potential, you know, tie up? >> well i don't think that that they need to be bought. i think that if there was the right comprehensive trade policy that was long term in the u.s, u.s. steel would do just fine. they've invested capital, they have good facilities. they need to invest more, but they need the environment to do that. we can't invest long term when every four years we get the rug pulled out from under us. how do you make hundreds of millions and billions of dollars of investment when you don't have a landscape that is stable enough? we are competitive. i am not

afraid of competing with anybody in the world. no problem. but i can't compete against governments. and my single biggest problem in my business is competing against dyslexic trade policy. it's a problem. >> understood, barry, thank you for so articulating this all so well, helping us understand the vagaries of the steel industry to really appreciate it today. >> the time. i appreciate. >> it of course. best of luck. barry zekelman joining us. we're back after this. >> individually, each of us is great. but from here you can see we're one big team at atlassian. we believe real progress takes all of us working together on new sources of energy, cars that drive to the future, even pizza deliveries. together we can go beyond where we've ever been collaborating from anywhere on everything. atlassian makes software for teams to do what is impossible alone. >> the number of public.

>> companies is shrinking, while the number of private companies is increasing. at franklin templeton. we're expanding access to. >> the growing. >> opportunity in private markets, offering the potential for greater diversification and enhanced returns through our world class specialist investment managers, we are empowering advisors with solutions to build the portfolios of the future today. alternatives by franklin templeton, your trusted partner for what's ahead. >> we empower. those who act, those who see the correlation between things above and things below the surface, those who navigate risk by meeting every turn with. >> a heightened. >> awareness of what's possible. constant assessment. the best position. catch the perfect wave cme group where risk meets opportunity.

>> for me, squawk box is breakfast with the most interesting people in the world. >> it's a privilege to get to talk to them every day. >> it's more. >> entertaining than any other morning. >> show, but you might get craig here pays too much for business wireless. so he sublet half his real estate office... to a pet shop. there's a smarter way to save. comcast business mobile. you could save up to an incredible 70% on your wireless bill. so you don't have to compromise. powering smarter savings. powering possibilities. switch to comcast business internet and mobile and find out how to get the new samsung galaxy s25+ on us with a qualifying trade in. don't wait, call, click or visit an xfinity store today.

vetted fiduciary. financial advisors@smartasset.com. >> welcome back. last night's blowout win by the eagles made it easier than ever for the super bowl commercials to steal the show. but did they? let's ask mark douglas, the ceo of ad tech firm mountain, who joins us along with fetch ceo wes schroll. his company gave away more than. $1 million in the final two minutes of the game. gentlemen, welcome to both of you. at least my kids did. but did anything really jump out at you? >> well, ironically so my opinion. >> was i'll back up. my opinion was, is that the super bowl 2025 was humorless, or at least the ads were. and since companies couldn't figure out how to how to tell a joke, and instead they figured out how to talk about their product, and i thought

fetch was one of those companies that thought they poppy. i actually bought poppy on the spot after i saw the ad, the. ads that told me what they actually do are the ones that i actually responded to. >> why was it so humorless, mark? you know, someone else was making the point that, you know, back in the day for independence day, they teased that movie in such a clever way, and now everyone just does these traditional trailers, and it all feels so boring and predictable. >> yeah. >> i mean, i think there were attempts at humor, but i mean, maybe there's another writers strike going on in hollywood that i don't know about, but like, people could not tell a joke in 2025. they should be embarrassed. >> all right. with with that introduction, let's turn it over to wes and mark. stay with us. so, wes, you guys did come up with something a little bit more clever. and this was late in the game when we don't really know how many people were watching. so what can you tell us about engagement? >> well, first. >> and foremost, i'm not a comedian. so that's why we decided. let's do something that's more on brand. let's reward people for watching the

end of the game, which turned out to be the most boring game you could expect. so at least we gave people something fun to do that they could actually look forward to. and we ended up hosting. we did that 32nd commercial, and in the two minutes following that 32nd commercial, we had 1.3 million people. download the app and sign up for fetch. so many. so that even apple was struggling to keep up with the download velocity. and then we had well over 3 million people that were live and engaging on that live stream, which we had done, which is a first one we have ever done, and kept them all captivated and interested because we had an average watch time of nine minutes and 20s wow from those. so people were definitely captivated. >> so people were still watching and they were still engaged. but your customer acquisition costs has to be pretty high, right? >> you know, for us, we actually did the commercial as a form of being able to work with general mills, one of our partners, just to show a bunch of the brands and advertisers that we work

with that fetch is here on the national stage. i mean, 1 in 10 u.s. households already use fetch every single month. so for us, the growth was actually a byproduct of the success of the b2b campaign that we were doing that culminated with the super bowl commercial. so for us, it was all upside. it was awesome. >> that's super interesting. mark, let me bring you back in here again. as an advertising guru, what are your conclusions then, from the fact that people spent $8 million, you know, and with wes's example aside, what did they walk away with? >> well, i. >> think like if you look at fetch's example and the words they literally just use is like they came onto the national stage. and so brands that did that and, you know, and kind of announced who they were and announced what their product is actually did really well. i don't think those downloads will just end tomorrow that they're getting i think, you know, they started some momentum and momentum they already had. they built on it and now they're going to continue. so i think

it's a good investment if for that if your brand old school brand humorless sad you know it just didn't work. there were some brands that created moments and i thought those worked really well. like the ad that the one, take me home, rocket mortgage, where even like like you couldn't listen to that and not start humming it. singing it. apparently they even showed that ad at the super bowl and people in the stadium started singing it, and it just kind of created a memorable moment that fits with the rocket mortgage brand. take me home. >> i'm almost thinking, was that are these going to evolve into more of like a vc, like a shark tank kind of moment for startup companies and those who want to make their debut on the national stage, instead of the traditional brands who are going to, you know, we think about the budweisers and the pepsi's and those who are just going to shell out money year after year to kind of stay relevant. >> i do think consumers are demanding a lot more right now. they're not ready for just like another humorless joke that

doesn't land. they want something that is truly engaging and unique. the thing i will say, though, is shooting our commercial is by far the easiest part of it. the actual execution of hosting a live stream that is at that scale. to put it in perspective, trivia hq, which a lot of people remember from a couple of years ago, was doing terrific with hosting these. we had more live stream people concurrently viewing our live stream than they ever had on their biggest night. so the actual tech infrastructure that we had to put in place to do that was incredibly difficult. but that being said, like mark talked about, it was us showing what our brand is. our brand is about people having fun and getting rewarded while they do it. so it was well worth the investment because it was our way of just bringing out what our brand was to the brands watching and consumers. >> do you think, mark, that's kind of the direction we're heading? >> i do, i think that you're going to you know, it starts with just more younger emerging companies moving on to television as a medium, something we've talked about a

lot. and i think them getting into the super bowl, you know, is just an extension of that and will continue. and but it's unique to the super bowl and a few other key events where you can draw that big an audience. so i don't think you'll see that across, you know, every basketball game or something like that. it's going to be these big moments. >> to julia's point, she has reported julia boorstin for us as well, that, you know, there's no guarantees for viewership or ad or any of this. the super bowl is its own beast. you pay to get in, you get what you get and you don't get upset. like the moms say. thank you both very much for your time today. appreciate it was the cool story and i'd love to know how it all turns out. you know, a year or so from now, what role of fetch and mark douglas of mountain and that's it for us. thanks for watching the exchange. and i'll watching the exchange. and i'll join brian ♪♪ [inner monologue] this is going to sound crazy. but i know these attack vectors.

oh, had a little upgrade have we? ♪♪ okay, so that's how you want to play. ♪♪ gift that's really impactful, but something that really makes a difference. jolie has been a tremendous gift. it's something that is not only looks beautiful, but makes us feel amazing and is something that we get to use every day. >> home. the place where you create those special moments. we celebrate the home and the way you live in it. at three de blinds, we help you create that special place. and because we know you're busy, we bring the showroom to you at your convenience and provide a design expert to help you find the perfect solution that fits your style and budget. three de

blinds. you'll love the treatment. call or go online right now to schedule your free in-home design consultation. >> what makes a. comfortable retirement? it's having the money to. >> retire on your terms. >> that means having a smart plan for how your money is invested, how long it needs to last, perhaps where it will go when you're gone. creating a retirement plan with fisher investments gives you the confidence your money will cover your health care costs, blast out your retirement, and perhaps become a legacy. >> take it from legendary money. manager ken fisher. >> retiring the way. >> you choose. >> makes a difference. >> call one. >> (800) 885-7650 for the fisher help, you need three. >> free, indispensable. >> guides to. >> retirement income, paying. >> for health. >> care, and providing peace of mind for. >> your. >> loved ones. >> call 1-800-885-7650. >> if you're planning to retire or are already there, fisher has the answers you need and our fees are structured so we do better when you do better. >> if your portfolio.

>> is 1 million or. >> more, call. >> for your three. >> for your three. >> free fisher guides. when emergency strikes, first responders rely on the latest technology. that's why t-mobile created t-priority built for the 5g era. only t-priority dynamically dedicates more capacity for first responders. >> and welcome to power lunch fly. markets fly. >> it's my best. >> philly impression. your money is on the rise again. stocks are higher. it's a good sign. >> because mondays. >> have been a little bit. >> manic so far this year. plus, why one of. >> the world's biggest energy companies. >> now in. >> the sights of. >> a very. >> aggressive hedge fund. >> and speaking. >> of energy. >> europe's woes getting even worse. >> power prices popping. >> kelly, you may not. >> care, but we're. >> going to. >> tell you why. >> what happens. there matters here. >> and we have