in north america, "john king usa" starts right now. you're on the hook tonight for more than $500 million and congress is trying to find out just how it happened. including whether a now bankrupt green energy firm got a big government loan because of political influence in the obama white house. don't hold your breath waiting for answers about what went wrong. >> mr. chairman, on the advice of my counsel, i must invoke the privilege afforded by the fifth amendment to the u.s. constitution and respectfully decline to answer any questions put to me by this committee and subcommittee. >> will you invoke your fifth amendment rights in response to all questions here today? >> yes. >> then you are excused from the witness table at this time. >> also, mahmoud abbas rejects appeals from the obama white house and asks the united nations for recognition as an independent state. >> translator: at a time when the arab peoples affirm their quest for democracy in what is

called now the arab spring, the time has come also for the palestinian spring. the time for independence. up first tonight, testing time for republican presidential front-runner rick perry. this from earlier today. a textbook example of playing it safe. >> our president, the great promiser of hope and change, he has delivered neither. >> this, on the other hand? call this throwing fuel on the fire. >> my friend governor perry said if you don't agree with his position giving in-state tuition to illegals, that you don't have a heart. i think if you're opposed to illegal immigration, it doesn't mean that you don't have a heart. it means that you have a heart and a brain. >> those competing speeches to a conservative political gathering continued. the immigration dividing line that was on display in last

night's latest feisty republican presidential debate. governor perry's immigration views, opposition to a border fence, support for in-state tuition breaks for the children of illegal immigrants are anathema to many conservatives. there is suddenly a sense the front-runner is perhaps a bit wobbly. our conservative contributor, eric ericson wrote this of governor perry's latest shaky debate performance. quote, rick perry stands on the precipice. he is about to fall off. a weekly standard editorial by the conservative bill crystal was equally harsh. no front-runner a presidential field has ever, we imagine, had as weak a showing as rick perry. it was close to a disqualifying two hours for him. it is, we remind you, only september 2011. still more than four months until the iowa caucuses but if governor perry is wounded tonight, how much so? eric is with us tonight from macon, georgia. long-time conservative activist al cardin is in atlanta and the veteran "washington post" political writer dan bowles is

with me in studio. dan, we have covered a lot of these things. this is a case of fast gravity, i guess. rick perry went up very quick. has he really fallen that fast? >> well, there is certainly a lot of air that's come out of the balloon. we have not seen with him what happened with michele bachmann, who went very quickly up and very rapidly down. but he has certainly been damaged by the three debates he's participated in. and the reviews particularly from conservatives, as you point out, have been very, very harsh, especially in the wake of last night's debate. so i think there's no question that he's wounded. does he have time to recover, certainly. but he's in a different place today than he was. >> let's dig deeper into exactly why. eric, i want to start with you on the policy. you heard governor romney there essentially going after governor perry, who said this in last night's debate. governor perry, the texas governor of a border state, supported the in-state tuition breaks for the children of illegal immigrants. here's why. >> but if you say that we should not educate children who have

come into our state for no other reason than they have been brought there by no fault of their own, i don't think you have a heart. >> that is his position. it has been his position for more than a decade, eric, but he's telling a lot of conservative voters who disagree with him they don't have a heart. >> yeah, that's not helpful. this reminds me of the george bush rhetoric in 2005 with his comprehensive immigration reform where conservatives got mad at him not necessarily to begin with with what he was doing, but the way he was demagoguing the issue against conservatives. this isn't going to help perry if he actually explained his policy, i actually think most conservatives would probably agree with it. we are actually only talking about a couple hundred students for the entire state of texas. and explain that versus the offset of if they weren't going to school getting an education, they would probably be sucking up community resources elsewhere. so that's his position. he just -- he did not have a debate performance last night worthy of a debate performance but of course, his camp today

says you know, he's lost every single debate he has ever been in in any election he's ever run in and still won those elections. >> he's never run for president. a lot of governors do find out it's a little different. i want to get to the debating skills or lack thereof in a second. you just heard eric saying if the governor defends his position, most conservatives would agree with him. we were together just a little more than a week ago at a luncheon in tampa and you had a lot of tea party activists there and they flat-out were just furious when they heard this about governor perry, state resources, their tax dollars, going to support the children of illegal immigrants. can he win this one with the conservative base on the policy question? >> you know, on the policy question, i didn't understand his response, frankly. conservatives believe in the tenth amendment. he could have said look, this is a state decision. people in the state of texas on both sides of the aisle supported the subsidy program, whether you agree with it or not, that's how we like it in texas. but he didn't use that argument.

nationally that doesn't sell. i think everyone on the panel, all the other candidates and most conservatives, didn't have a problem with kids who didn't have anything to do with the decision to come to america going to college but i don't think anyone in the conservative movement agrees they ought to receive subsidies, no matter how many of them. frankly, something that stuck in our craw was if they were in arkansas, a military veteran wanted to go to school in texas, they would have to pay $100,000 more for their education than that other kid. that won't sell well. obviously, governor perry entered this race, john, without any chinks in the armor. as the campaign goes on, folks find out all candidates have a chink in their armor and we are beginning to discover a few in his. >> that is one of the questions, that's an important policy issue he's going to have to litigate with conservative voters. can they set that aside even if they disagree with him and maybe support him for other positions. one of the other big things about governor perry was people said here's this texan, he's

smooth, aggressive, tough, he's the guy we can see up on the stage against barack obama in the next debates. then this comes along, his third debate. his reviews have been so-so, not great. here, he's trying to draw a contrast with mitt romney, trying to say romney is inconsistent, he flip-flops on the issues, but the answer sounds a bit rambling. listen. >> i think americans just don't know sometimes which mitt romney they're dealing with. is it the mitt romney that was on the side of against the second amendment before he was for the second amendment, was it before he was before the social programs from the standpoint of he was for standing up for roe versus wade, before he was against roe versus wade. he was for race to the top, he's for obama-care and now he's against it.

i mean, we'll wait until tomorrow and see which mitt romney we're really talking to tonight. >> to be fair to the governor, dan, all candidates have rough debate performances, especially new candidates on the presidential stage. sometimes whether it's nerves, whether it's inexperience, he hasn't debated a lot in his races. if he's been ahead, they said no to debates. if you're trying to sell yourself in this republican year, when republicans feel the president is vulnerable, is the guy you want up on that stage next october, that didn't help. >> no, it sure didn't. that particular answer along with some of the other things he had to say last night and some of the other debates, have really caused people to say is this the rick perry that we thought we were getting when he came into the race. on paper, he looked really good to a lot of conservatives. but as you know, presidential campaigns are a much different order of battle than anything he's gone through. he's never experienced this. there is obviously nerves, there is lack of preparation and i think the third thing he suffers from is he's had to do this all under the bright lights. everybody gets a chance to make

mistakes kind of out of public view. every mistake he makes now is going to be magnified. >> so when you're talking to conservative activists at your cpac meeting today, in other settings, what are their questions now that they have seen this guy, most are probably favorably disposed. what's the number one and two question they have? >> yeah, john, using the football metaphor, the big question is is he in preseason form or is this a regular season and this is the best you get. most of his supporters push back saying he's brand new into the process, he's in preseason form, wait until he gets a good hang of it. other folks are saying if this is the best he's got, he's in real trouble. i don't know the answer to that. i guess we'll know as the future takes hold. but one thing he's got going for him, unlike previous years where we had two or three debates and a debate like this would have been fatal, you fellows are going to have 12 or 15 of these things by the time the primary season's over so if he lost one

round like he did yesterday, he may have ten more rounds to go to recover. but recover, he must, if he's going to continue to be a top tier contender. >> al, dan, thank you. eric will be back with us in a little bit. gentlemen, thanks for your help tonight. we have more debates coming and we know governor perry will probably feel the pressure to be in the next one. thank you. developments today at the united nations and in the middle east. next, will it bring israel and palestinians any closer? [ male announcer ] when you play in the same sandbox as luxury s.u.v.s, it helps to have the quality and craftsmanship of your leather interior test better than the lexus rx 350. it's also helpful to set your "select terrain" dial to "sand." ♪ with $500 bonus cash during the jeep celebration event, there's never been a better time or reason to celebrate at your jeep dealer.

♪ ♪ ♪ when the things that you need ♪ ♪ come at just the right speed, that's logistics. ♪ ♪ medicine that can't wait legal briefs there by eight, ♪ ♪ that's logistics. ♪ ♪ freight for you, box for me box that keeps you healthy, ♪ ♪ that's logistics. ♪ ♪ saving time, cutting stress, when you use ups ♪ ♪ that's logistics. ♪

♪ [ country ] [ man ] ♪ gone, like my last paycheck ♪ gone, gone away ♪ gone, like my landlord's smile ♪ ♪ gone, gone away ♪ my baby's gone away with dedicated claims specialists... and around-the-clock service, travelers can help make things better quicker. will your auto and home insurer... be there when you need them most? for an agent or quote, call 800-my-coverage... or visit travelers.com.

at the united nations today, a defiant public demand for palestinian statehood and an urgent private effort by the united states and others to get some semblance of a peace process restarted. and quickly. the push for statehood by the palestinian president authority, president mahmoud abbas, came despite appeals from the obama administration that he give diplomacy more time. >> translator: i do not believe anyone with a shred of conscience can reject our application for a full membership in the united nations and our admission as an independent state. >> that palestinian request is vehemently opposed by israel and

gener benjamin netanyahu said granting statehood now would be a statehood, not progress. >> israel is prepared to have a palestinian state in the west bank but we're not prepared to have another gaza there. that's why we need to have real security arrangements which the palestinians simply refuse to negotiate with us. >> as that war of words played out, two dynamics worth noting. first, cheers for president abbas and celebrations as he made his case for statehood at the u.n. later, though, some clashes between palestinian youths near israeli checkpoints. you see them there, in the west bank. also t so-called quartet worked on a new proposal designed to get direct negotiations started again, they hope within four weeks. the goal is to have an agreement, a peace agreement, by the end of 2012 but the quartet's statement avoids the most difficult obstacles to peace talks now.

palestinians, for an example, demand an immediate freeze of settlement expansions. israel demands recognition as a jewish state. hardly clear, this push to resume talks will actually result in productive negotiations but that didn't stop secretary of state hillary clinton from hailing it as a significant break-through. >> the quartet proposal represents the firm conviction of the international community that a just and lasting peace can only come through negotiations between the parties. therefore, we urge both parties to take advantage of this opportunity to get back to talks. >> let's take a look at how these different perspectives play out on the map. essentially if you look here, this is the border of israel, roughly along the 67 border but you see in this area here in the west bank, you see yellow shading. that's because israel has security control over much of the west bank area. what do the palestinians want? they want an independent state, that had this land here, the

palestinians want east jerusalem and the gaza strip. in negotiations in the past, they have tried negotiate some sort of land swap that gives them a contiguous state that involves some of this land so the palestinian territories would be connected in the state. that is what they want. let me clear that up. one of the big obstacles, israel has built a wall. you see it here, sometimes eight or ten miles in from israel proper into the west bank areas. that's a security wall built for security purposes. it alienates, to say the least, the palestinians. then this. this is the biggest hang-up. these are all israeli settlements. you see israel proper here, the west bank here, all these israeli settlements, many still expanding. a huge source of contention. the palestinians want any expansions stopped immediately before they agree to go back to the peace table. all of these issues, you have seen this map for decades, a short time ago i discussed the obstacles to peace with the israeli ambassador to the united nations. >> mr. ambassador, thanks for joining us. you heard president abbas today. he says essentially there's an arab spring all across the

region, why can't we palestinians have our independence? we have been waiting so long. he says the old ways, waiting for negotiation, haven't worked. why is he wrong to go to the united nations and say we haven't been able to negotiate this, so just grant us statehood? >> first, good to be with you, john. the answer is very simple. by declaring a state unilaterally, it won't bring about peace. it won't bring about stability. it won't bring about the same type of benefits that people protesting in the streets across the middle east are struggling for. there is no shortcut to peace, john. you got to sit down face-to-face, israelis and palestinians, and work out the difficult problems. we do have some very difficult problems, but as prime minister netanyahu told the u.n. today, he's ready to do it, ready to do it today, and meet with president mahmoud abbas in the u.n. building to reach an historic peace. he held out his hand and he hoped that the palestinians would accept that hand. >> he held out his hand but he also said, i want you to listen to some of the prime minister's speech, i know you're quite familiar with it, he was going

through a litany of some of the issues and brought up the very difficult, always contentious issues of settlement. here's the prime minister's take. >> the core of the conflict is not the settlements. the settlements are a result of the conflict. the settlements have to be -- it's an issue that has to be addressed and resolved in the course of negotiations. >> if we were having this conversation five or six years ago, i think some palestinians might say okay, i get the point, those were there. but as you know, a burning issue for the palestinians is the continued growth and expansion of settlements. would the prime minister, is there any gesture he could make, pulling back some, shutting down some, any gesture he could make that maybe would convince the palestinians he means it when he says let's sit down, let's talk? >> well, we froze settlement building for ten months to get the palestinians back to the negotiating table, john. they didn't come back. so that gesture is not going to work. i think that the prime minister said today that he had been

discussing with the united states some ideas about moving forward, there were some things there that were hard for us, there were some things we knew would be hard for the palestinians but he's willing to take that step forward, too, even though it's difficult to get the palestinians back to the negotiating table. >> as you know, it's not unfamiliar to you, israel sometimes gets beat up in the court of public opinion, certainly at the united nations. i want to read from a "new york times" editorial just today. the main responsibility right now belongs to prime minister benjamin netanyahu of israel who refuses to make any serious compromises for peace. he appears far more concerned about his own political survival than his country's increasing isolation or the threat of renewed violence in the west bank and all around israel's borders. that is the "new york times" there. i want you to listen here, mr. ambassador. bill clinton, former president of the united states, considered i believe you would say a friend of israel. listen to the exasperation in his voice right here. >> but sooner or later, everybody's going to have to come clean here. if the current government has decided that there will be no

palestinian state and that they have no intention of having a reasonable settlement on the west bank, they should say that so the palestinians can get on with their lives and they should live with the consequences. >> it's not just the palestinians, sir, who are skeptical that the prime minister genuinely wants peace. >> well, i have nothing but respect for president clinton, but here you have the prime minister of israel who in his first public address, he was the leader of the party now, came out and embraced the two state solution. he gave that ten-month unprecedented moratorium on new construction in west bank settlements and by the way, the word unprecedented was the word the secretary of state clinton used to describe it. he removed hundreds of roadblocks and checkpoints from the west bank to facilitate a very remarkable palestinian economic growth there. he eased up on restrictions going in and out of gaza to get the palestinians back to the negotiating table. this is a person who has done one thing after another to try

to get those negotiations restarted, and i'm hard-pressed, i think you would be hard-pressed to think of anything the palestinians have done except to refuse to go back into negotiations. it's quite tragic. >> the prime minister made an important point in his speech that we left gaza and look what we got. do you worry at all, though, if mr. abbas does not get negotiations, does not get statehood, that over the course of the next weeks and months, his political support in the west bank could be severely undermined and you may get another gaza like it or not? >> well, we hope not and we are preparing for all sorts of eventualities and preparing our security forces, preparing our population. i think that the palestinians can look at the situation in gaza, where there's no economy, no great future for the children and grandchildren of the parents of gaza. look where they are today in the west bank, where there is a thriving economy, and there is a possibility for a much brighter future not only for their children, but our children, and they have that choice. they literally have two windows in front of them. they could choose the gaza way

or they can choose the way of peace with israel, which can be better for all peoples in the entire region. we hope they make that choice. >> ambassador, appreciate your time tonight, sir. still ahead, who benefits most from a prolonged fight for the republican nomination? the winning candidate? or president obama? ♪ ♪ ♪ when your chain of supply ♪ goes from here to shanghai, that's logistics. ♪ ♪ chips from here, boards from there ♪ ♪ track it all through the air, that's logistics. ♪ ♪ clearing customs like that ♪ hurry up no time flat that's logistics. ♪ ♪ all new technology ups brings to me, ♪ ♪ that's logistics. ♪ ♪ [ female announcer ] the road is not exactly

a place of intelligence. highway maintenance is underfunded, costing drivers $67 billion a year, and countless tires. which drivers never actually check because they're busy, checking email. this is why we engineered a car that makes 2,000 decisions every second. the new audi a6 is here. the road is now an intelligent place. ♪ the road is now an intelligent place. somewhere in america, a city comes to life. it moves effortlessly, breathes easily. it flows with clean water. it makes its skyline greener and its population healthier. all to become the kind of city people want to live and work in. somewhere in america, we've already answered some of the nation's toughest questions. and the over sixty thousand people of siemens are ready to do it again. siemens. answers.

if nothing else, three debates in three weeks helping us learn more about the republican candidates for president. but also raising an interesting question. does all this debating produce a stronger nominee or a scarred nominee? and the sharp attacks hardly limited to the debates. jon huntsman suggests former massachusetts governor mitt romney isn't the conservative he claims to be. >> i'm not standing over a history of being pro-choice, raising taxes and enacting heavy-handed government mandates, so before believing the hype and rhetoric, all i ask is that you take a look at the record and make your judgments and decisions based on the record. >> let's assess the state of the gop race with cnn contributors

mary matalin. it has been governor perry taking most of the hits since he got into the race and rose right to the top. you have been through a bunch of these. do you worry at all that all this debate and the increasingly sharp rhetoric will scar your nominee and maybe expose some chink that makes them unelectable or does it make them stronger and tougher? >> i don't worry and by far, it makes them stronger and tougher, as is evidenced by mitt romney's exceeding expectations. i remember the first time he was at cpac and there was so much expectation for him and the speech fell flat so the longer you're out there, the more times you run around the track, the stronger you get. the notion that our having an internecine debate is going to be worse than what the obama people are going to throw at us, it's not even close. i think it sounds counterintuitive and everybody gets really excited when the other guys are fighting each

other but it's good and the larger good is that if you listen to this group collectively, starting with newt and herman cain who have been consistently the best in all of these debates, collectively they have been making a sound and clear case for conservative governance and a very sound and clear case against obama. so i think lots of the debates, as panicky as they're making us for the moment, really help over the long run. >> eric, mary used the word long run. is it your sense most republicans i talked to and i think you're in this camp, see what one, i think jokingly, i'm not quite certain, refers to it as the perry/romney death march, thinking this will go on for some time. here's the american research group poll september 16th through 21st, among likely voters in new hampshire, you've got romney way up there. romney at 30, perry at 13. there's a suffolk university poll of new hampshire voters also has romney way up. the state of new hampshire, which is the first primary. but governor perry has been ahead in all the national polls.

governor perry has been ahead in south carolina. i think governor perry is ahead at the moment in iowa. is the expectation among most conservatives that this is going to be one wins, then the other wins, we march on for awhile? >> no, not really. i think everyone kind of thinks this is going to go on for awhile but you know, for awhile, just for perspective right now, is go on until iowa, new hampshire and south carolina, which is four months away. it seems like we've been doing this since november 7th of 2010. we have been in this. look, it does make a stronger candidate. if you look historically, even in the house races, senate races and presidential races, the candidates down to the state level, the candidates who don't have aggressive primaries typically are the candidates who flame out in general elections pretty badly. the ones who have strong contested primaries become stronger candidates in the general because a lot of the attacks become the same attacks repackaged so they are able to respond to them. a great example of this is the democrats are out there saying the republicans are too far

right to get elected. so we've got jon huntsman attacking mitt romney for being too liberal, we've got mitt romney standing to the left of rick perry on entitlements, the other candidates pushing rick perry to the left on immigration. it's kind of hard to say these guys are right wing extremists when they're being attacked for being too moderate on some of these issues. >> mary, i want you to listen to governor perry at the cpac conference. de not have a very good night last night. i'm being kind. he tries to make the case today that well, that debating thing really doesn't matter all that much. >> as conservatives, we know that values and vision matter. it's not who is the slickest candidate or the smoothest debater that we need to elect. we need to elect the candidate with the best record and the best vision for this country. >> i assume republicans looking for somebody to go up against president obama hope that after the next debate or the one after that, governor perry doesn't need to say we're not looking for the best debater anyway,

right? >> you know, there are four critical elements in a primary phase. money, staff and endorsements, what's going on in the states, and political skills, and debate skills. so he's got three out of four. now, we don't know if they're all equally weighted. he did not have a good night. he's not had a good run of performances but he's working against very heightened expectations, against a klieg lighted at warp speed front-runner position. but yes, debates matter, being able to articulate conservativism, it's not that he isn't the most conservative and he does have the best record on things that conservatives care about, and he really could have explained, as eric said earlier, he's right, that immigration position is substantively solid. he did not explain it now three times but i have been in a room with him, in meetings with him, i'm not on anybody's campaign, i have been in events with him, he was at the southern leadership conference here in new orleans,

he can rock a room. what he needs to do is make up for his debate deficits by being in venues that accentuate his really dramatic charisma. so far, he's not done that in a national way but i think he's still doing that in the states that matter. >> in the states that matter. mary, eric, thanks for coming in on a friday night. we got more debates. little bit of a break here so if governor perry needs a little work on that, he's got a little time before the next two coming up pretty soon, including a cnn one in october in vegas. still ahead, a satellite is falling from space and there's a chance some pieces could land right here in the united states. and former vice president al gore tells cnn what he thinks about president obama's record on the environment. capital one's new cash rewards card

gives you a 50% annual bonus! so you earn 50% more cash. according to research, everybody likes more cash. well, almost everybody... ♪ would you like 50% more cash? no! but it's more money. [ male announcer ] the new capital one cash rewards card. the card for people who want 50% more cash.

what's in your wallet? woah! [ giggles ] and who ordered the yummy cereal? yummy. [ woman ] lower cholesterol. [ man 2 ] yummy. i got that wrong didn't i? [ male announcer ] want great taste and whole grain oats that can help lower cholesterol? honey nut cheerios.

welcome back. here's the latest news you need to know right now. the dow and nasdaq and s&p 500 closed slight higher today but the gains not enough to keep this from being the dow's worst week since october 2008. the vatican statement says pope benedict was quote, moved and quote, deeply shaken by today's meeting with men and women who are victims of abuse by catholic priests. the pope is on a four-day visit to his native germany. following through on a promise made a couple weeks ago in shanksville, pennsylvania, george w. bush and bill clinton along with john boehner have recorded an appeal for donations to finish the memorial for the passengers and crew of flight 93 which crashed in shanksville on september 11th, 2001. we don't hear much from al gore these days but in a new

interview, the former vice president has both good and bad things to say about president obama's record on the environment. >> i have a lot of empathy for president obama inheriting a really difficult situation and a political environment, and i recognize that he's done a lot of good things, the auto efficiency standards, fantastic. some of the moves he's made in other areas, really great. but on the climate issue, i have said in the past i think that he should be doing more. >> former vice president there. you're on the hook now for half a billion dollars. coming up, why congress can't get any answers about who is to blame. [ oswald ] there's a lot of discussion going on about the development of natural gas,

whether it can be done safely and responsibly. at exxonmobil we know the answer is yes. when we design any well, the groundwater's protected by multiple layers of steel and cement. most wells are over a mile and a half deep so there's a tremendous amount of protective rock between the fracking operation and the groundwater. natural gas is critical to our future. at exxonmobil we recognize the challenges and how important it is to do this right. accept it. you can't change the way banking works. just accept it, man. free ? doesn't close at five ? try nature. you give them all your money, and they put you on hold.

just accept it. what are you going to do, bury your money in the backyard ? accept it. just stay with the herd, son. accept it. it's only money. it's a bank. what do you want, a hug ? just accept it, friend. hidden fees, fine print, or they'll stick it to you some other way. smile and accept it. it's been this way since pants. accept it... just accept it. accept it. i'm a doctor. just accept it. accept it... accept it. just accept it ! if we miss this movie, you're dead. if you're stuck accepting banking nonsense, you need an ally. ally bank. no nonsense. just people sense.

anderson cooper 360 coming up at the top of the hour. he's here with a preview. >> the program at 8:00 p.m., we're beginning with congress and its inability to basically get anything done. the latest frustration, yet another potential shutdown looming of the government because politicians can't agree on a bill to keep the government running until mid-november. despite the gridlock, guess what? the house is packing its bags for vacation next week. we're keeping them honest. big day for amanda knox and her family. she's the american student convicted of murdering her roommate in 2009. her appeal trial started today. her family hopes new information about how dna evidence was handled will help free her. i spoke with amanda's mom about how her daughter is holding up. >> she's amazing.

i don't know how she does it. she's obviously stressed. today was horrible, you know, listening to really terrible lies about her, about the case, and she just had to sit and listen to it, and it obviously caused a lot of stress, but she's hanging in there. >> more of the interview coming up. and something to make you laugh, tonight's ridiculist. >> looking forward to it. a classic moment of capitol hill drama earlier today. the top executives of a bankrupt solar energy company raised their right hands, swore to tell the truth, then refused to answer any questions. >> i need to make sure your mike's on, if you don't mind. do you both swear that the testimony that you are about to give is the whole truth and nothing but the truth, so help you god? >> yes. >> thank you, mr. harrison. thank you, mr. stover. the chairman recognizes himself for questioning of the

witnesses, and i should be less than two minutes, hopefully. mr. harrison and mr. stover, we're very -- was every document and piece of information you submitted to the department of energy and the white house office of management and budget, the united states congress and your investors, accurate and complete to the best of your knowledge? >> they didn't answer, of course. they used their fifth amendment rights against self-incrimination. those executives ran a company called solyndra. it made solar panels and was the star of president obama's push for clean energy and green jobs. he visited the plant may, 2010. solyndra also received a half billion dollars in government guaranteed loan, money u.s. taxpayers now have to pay back. congress is looking into how much pressure the white house put on regulators to approve those loan guarantees. one of solyndra's main investors was a big contributor to the president's 2008 campaign. today, lawmakers wanted to ask solyndra's executives whether they misled the government about the company's shaky finances and, well, congress wasn't happy when they refused to answer.

>> we finally had to resort to a subpoena and now the outright resistance of getting answers that both of you, our two witnesses, assured us only last week that you would provide. let me just warn you and the other folks involved in this taxpayer ripoff, we're not done. no, we're not. >> the "new york times" eric lipton co-wrote today's excellent front page story about the rush to assist solyndra. he's with us tonight. let's start with the white house, one of the big questions congress has, one of them is political influence but one is just the facts. were there warning signs, were there flashing red lights that said hey, this company has problems, don't give them this loan? >> even as of late 2008 before obama became president, there was a huge decline in the price of silicon which was an essential ingredient in solar panels. that was a warning sign that perhaps the whole business plan for this company was perhaps troubled because it relied upon the silicon prices being at a

certain level. so at the end of the bush administration, they were concerned that maybe this was going to undermine their plan and then there was a move early on in obama to disapprove it. some people in the obama administration say not ready for prime time, we need more time, we want to scrub the business plan more yet it is approved. one of the questions now, as you report in the piece today, at least three visits by solyndra officials to valerie jarrett's office, top white house official, key access to the president there. she's the outreach to the business community but she also has some sway. any reason to be concerned or raise alarms about that or is it normal business? >> it wasn't with valerie jarrett herself, it was with an aide. there was a lot of interaction between the company and the white house. clearly this company had hired six different lobbying firms in the period since the beginning of the obama administration. it was heavily working washington. and that may have been part of the reason that they continued to get funds even as there were signs that they were in a serious decline and they were able to get their loan restructured and that the private sector got, you know, the first line of defense against potential bankruptcy.

so there are some signs that perhaps their lobbying had an effect. >> so one of the questions people are trying to connect the dots, did fund-raising, political influence, political friendship, help here. george kaiser is the billionaire fund-raiser for obama 2008, backs the foundation of the top investor here. is it just this happened, that happened or can anyone connect the dots? >> so far, it's a great question for the republicans to ask, because it looks, it makes it look like this was some political conspiracy, but there's no evidence at all so far that i've seen that george kaiser played a role in getting this loan done. it does not appear to be a political contributor getting payback. there's no evidence of that that i've seen. >> i want to follow up on that point. the best evidence you have seen so far is maybe bad judgment, maybe a bad call, maybe even an egregious judgment but nothing to suggest undue political influence or essentially a decision that was bought? >> no. what i see is that this was an administration that had promised change. it wanted to get money out the door for the stimulus quickly. it was rushing to get this done in 60 days. that was an imperative from the white house, to do it quickly. i think that perhaps in that rush, they may have been a

little too fast in their review of some of the warning signs that were out there. >> how cooperative has the white house been with you in trying to get documents? there is some frustration in congress. how about from a reporter's perspective? >> they have answered my questions. they have put people, they have made people available to answer my questions. they provided me with some documents. they have been pretty responsive. >> appreciate it. great report today. >> thank you. >> thank you. let's get more on the congressional investigation now from the committee's top democrat, who made a point this morning that he thought republicans seemed more interested in political theater than finding the facts. >> what we have heard today is a line of questions that seemed designed to create catchy sound bites. these questions constitute witness badgering that's both unseemly and inconsistent with a long line of precedent. >> the california congressman henry waxman joins us now. sir, thanks for being with us. you say you see political theater but i just want to ask you off the top, you have been the chairman of this committee in the past for a long time, you have led a number of

investigations. it is not a good thing when top executives of a company come in and all plead the fifth. not good for them and certainly not good for the obama white house, either, is it? >> well, i was disappointed that they took the fifth amendment. i wanted to ask them a lot of questions. the ceo of solyndra came in and told me how his business was doing very well, they were going to double their revenues, and a month later, they went into bankruptcy. i was disappointed but on the other hand, they do have the constitutional right to assert the fifth amendment. but that means we've got to continue the investigation and get the information from every source that's possible, because we ought to find out what went on with solyndra, the contract they got and the loss for the taxpayers of $500 million. >> i know you think some republicans are leaping to conclusions before they have all the facts, but do you have questions, a lot of these republicans are saying the white house should have seen the flashing lights before the loan was given or at least soon after the loan was given, and done something about it. instead, the republicans think

because of political favoritism, political pressure, this thing was kept in the pipeline. is that a legitimate question? >> well, it's a legitimate question but they shouldn't assert that there was a political motive without evidence to sustain it. what i want to know is whether solyndra misrepresented to the administration their own financial stability because they were certainly making that misrepresentation to me. but i believe investigations ought to be to find the facts and then see what conclusions you would reach. but the republicans are attacking the obama administration, they're just trying to use it in some ways, they're trying to use it for political purposes. i don't want to begrudge them the fact they do want to get to the facts and this is a bipartisan investigation. >> right. taxpayers, more than $500 million left holding the bill. in the "new york times" story on this mess this morning, there is a paragraph saying paragraph saying that solyndra's lobbyists corresponded frequently, met at the white house at least three times with an aide to the top white house

official valerie jarrett to push for loans, tax breaks, other government assistance. you remember candidate obama saying he was not going to play by the old washington rules, that things were going to be different. does this look like the same old washington to you? >> well, i don't know whether those meetings took place or what was said at those meetings. the republicans were complaining that one of the investors in solyndra had also contributed to the obama campaign. that doesn't tell me anything. they also had investors who were very active republicans. but getting contacted by a company or their representatives is approved by the constitution of the united states. we're supposed to hear from our constituents. but we're supposed to make the decision based on what were the merits. and if they weren't able to show they were going to be successful, we shouldn't have lent them the money. >> as a veteran investigator for several decades here in washington, when you see the e-mails from staffers at the office of management and budget saying hey, we need more time, hey, this one's not ready for

prime time. when you pick up "the new york times" and read this comment from an energy department official, we had to knock down some barriers standing in the way to get these projects funded said matthew rogers, the energy department official overseeing the loan program. does that suggest to you that somewhere there was pressure? >> it suggests to me that the budget people had some questions about it but other budget people said go ahead. the energy people were excited about it through two administrations. and i think the pressure that i know of -- and again, i don't want to reach conclusions about everything, was to get this thing approved quickly enough so that the vice president can go and announce it and the president later can go to solyndra to show that this is the wave of the future. i'm sure they didn't want to do that to get it approved quicker if they had any thought that this was going to be a failure. they thought it was going to be a great success. they turned out to be wrong. >> congressman waxman, appreciate your help tonight. we'll keep in touch as the

investigation moves forward. >> thank you. >> thank you, sir. next, a nasa satellite is supposed to fall out of the sky tonight. where will the pieces hit? stay tuned. ♪ and the flowers and the trees ♪ ♪ all laugh when you walk by ♪ and the neighbors' kids run and hide ♪ deep inside you, there's a person who refuses to be kept deep inside you. ♪ but you're not ♪ you're the one be true to yourself. what's healthier than that? or creates another laptop bag or hires another employee, it's not just good for business -- it's good for the entire community.

at bank of america, we know the impact that local businesses have on communities, so we're helping them with advice from local business experts and extending $18 billion in credit last year. that's how we're helping set opportunity in motion. i'm a dad, coach, and i was a longtime smoker. in my heart i knew for the longest time that did not want to be a smoker. and the fact that i failed before. i think i was discouraged for a very long time. ♪ knowing that i could smoke during the first week was really important to me. [ male announcer ] chantix is a non-nicotine pill proven to help people quit smoking. [ jeff ] chantix reduced my urge to smoke, and personally that's what i knew i needed. [ male announcer ] some people had changes in behavior, thinking or mood, hostility, agitation, depressed mood and suicidal thoughts or actions while taking or after stopping chantix. if you notice any of these, stop taking chantix and call your doctor right away. tell your doctor about any history of depression or other mental health problems,

which could get worse while taking chantix. don't take chantix if you've had a serious allergic or skin reaction to it. if you develop these, stop taking chantix and see your doctor right away as some of these can be life-threatening. if you have a history of heart or blood vessel problems, tell your doctor if you have new or worse symptoms. get medical help right away if you have symptoms of a heart attack. dosing may be different if you have kidney problems. until you know how chantix affects you, use caution when driving or operating machinery. common side effects include nausea, trouble sleeping and unusual dreams. ♪ these are the reasons i quit smoking. [ male announcer ] ask your doctor about chantix. over 7 million people have gotten a prescription. learn how you can save money and get terms and conditions at chantix.com. down the hill? man: all right. we were actually thinking, maybe... we're going to hike up here, so we'll catch up with you guys. [ indistinct talking and laughter ]

whew! i think it's worth it. working with a partner you can trust is always a good decision. massmutual. let our financial professionals help you reach your goals. a nasa success story from 1991, well, could hit you on the head tonight. the uars satellite was carried into the orbit by the space shuttle. that's what it looks like. upper atmosphere research satellite. it was up there to study the chemical composition of the earth's atmosphere. well, tonight or tomorrow evening it will re-enter the

atmosphere. i'll show you a bit of the path here. when we started the show, it was over australia. we think it's somewhere roughly around here right now. nasa says when this happens, i'll play it th out a little bit, that's what's going around the world, nasa says when this happens and it comes back into the atmosphere it's going to break up into pieces. 26 pieces, perhaps. ranging in size from ten pounds to hundreds of pounds. may survive that re-entry, hit somewhere possibly in the united states. charles lu is a professor of astrophysics at the state university of new york. professor lu, thanks for being with us. and help me out. i'm going to close this one down and bring up another animation as you speak so i can show our viewers. what are the rhys snkz as this thing hits and breaks into pieces, some of them perhaps 300 pounds coming to earth, what are the risks of someone getting hurt? >> i tell you what, the bottom line is that you have 100,000 times better chance of striking it rich in the lottery than to be hit by one of these pieces. so i wouldn't lose any sleep tonight. >> you're going to have a lot of people going out to play the lottery right now. how close can nasa be given that

this thing is traveling around so fast, how close can any prediction be of where it was going to hit? it was over australia when we started the show. somewhere over the next hours it will come down. >> right. they did a pretty good job, but you can think about it as trying to predict, say, the path of hurricane irene. but this time on a orbital scale. it's not an easy task, especially since the sun has had a lot of activity lately. when you have solar flares coming through, it temporarily affects the magnetic field of earth in such a way that the atmosphere can grow and shrink. and when that happens, it can change the speed of the satellite ever so slightly back and forth. so they probably got it pretty good in the sort of 12 to 18-hour window. beyond that nothing is really certain. >> and we've known for some time about this probability, possibility. all of a sudden there's a lot of interest. i guess that's to be expected. is there anything more in the design that anybody could do to prevent this. or is this simply what happens when -- >> well, it's really interesting. about 20 years ago when this satellite was launched, nasa actually had no official policy

about what to do about things falling out of the sky. since then the policies have been established. different protocols are in now for satellites that have been launched. the probabilities were just so low of these things coming down and actually hurting anybody or anything that it wasn't part of the policy. but now it is. and fortunately, it doesn't make any difference. i think we've always been very interested in things falling from the sky, even from ancient and medieval times. this is certainly a manmade event. but in the end it's kind of fun to see things falling out of the sky, especially since they're not going to hurt us at all. >> kind of fun as long as you're right on that last point. this has been driving traffic on cnn.com all day long. why is it do you think people get so fascinated by this idea that look up in the sky, it's a satellite, here it comes? >> well, you know, 1,000 years ago people thought that comets and shooting stars were divine messages. we've always as humans had a fascination with things in the sky, whether they're falling out of them or moving around them or moving away from us. and i think this is just an extension of that. maybe we've gotten a little more attention on this one recently

simply because it's coming a little earlier than scheduled because of the solar activity. in fact, last year an even larger satellite fell down last summer, and there was absolutely no fanfare involved. >> more to come? we're sending more stuff up. does that mean we're going to have more coming down? >> no question about it. but fortunately, i think nasa now has it right in terms of how to make sure that the space debris is even safer than it is now. >> professor liu, appreciate your insights on this night. i just want to show our viewers this one more time. when it comes down and begins to break up, it will look something like this. it'll hit the atmosphere. you'll see the pieces there. it will be many pieces. let's hope professor liu is right and they all come down and land in harmless places, some of them perhaps as much as 300 pounds. it's fascinating to watch. we appreciate professor liu's insight. that's all for us tonight. have a great weekend. we'll see you back here on monday night. "anderson cooper 360" starts "anderson cooper 360" starts right now. -- captions by vitac -- www.vitac.com good evening, everyone. thanks for joining us. it is 8:00 p.m. on the east coast. we begin tonight keeping them