but a lot of the important things that have gone down at this summit have happened behind the scenes. some of them we may never be privy to. but it hasn't all been, you know, i guess, tea and cookies you can say. president obama did have some, as i mentioned, those bilateral meetings, the one on one meetings. for instance, he had one with the president of china, hu jintao, and we know from a white house official that he expressed frustration and impatience at the way that china is moving forward on economic issues. so certainly there have been some touchy subjects that have been broached in that meeting. we know they discussed intellectual property rights. the u.s. trying to protect its intellectual property rights in china and certainly having a really difficult time doing that. and also currency manipulation. so there have definitely been some touchy subjects. he met with the president of russia, medvedev. and they discussed iran. of course, the u.s. looking for some cooperation there and not on the same page with russia.

trying to present a front agreement on moving forward and a common response there. but at the same time, not a lot of specifics showing that there is still some daylight between the two. a jovial atmosphere. it's certainly how do you sort of not have a smile on your face when this is the scenery around you but also touching on serious subjects here as well. >> brianna keilar, thank you very much. please stand by. also dan lothian stand by. we have to get to business for our viewers here in the united states. they expect us to deliver a full newscast and catch them up on news. we're going to do that right now. here is the quote. enough is enough. that's the message. many u.s. cities are sending the occupy wall street movement. police in portland, oregon, today arrested more than 50 protesters as they cleared city parks of makeshift camps. >> this particular standoff you are looking at on a city street

lasted for hours. the mayor of portland, oregon, told cnn he was sympathetic to the occupy movement but their encampments had become public health hazards and had to be torn down. ies ka from koin is in portland and joins us from pioneer courthouse square with the very latest. tell us what's going on around you. has everyone cleared out or are they still in the face-off with police? >> well, right now, don, they are actually in pioneer courthouse square which is basically in the center of portland and the heart of downtown portland. they moved here after being moved out of three public parks in the downtown portland area. and there was actually a long standoff situation before the protesters came here to pioneer courthouse square. a standoff with police and riot officers and protesters from the occupy movement. but also others -- many who are called anarchists who have been sparring with police. they are a more violent portion of these protesters sparring with police. that standoff situation lasted for hours. no one was seriously hurt but

the tensions were very high. the sides went back and forth. the possibility of teargas being used was definitely a possibility but it didn't come to that. and so now it all subsided and they've moved here to pioneer courthouse square. the protesters, they've been chanting here in the parks getting their message out. they say they don't plan to camp here in pioneer courthouse square. this park actually closes at midnight tonight. they don't plan to camp, but they plan to stay here and get their message out. the big question that everybody here in oregon and the portland area wants to know is what's next from here? they say they want to continue to send their message out, continue to possibly camp. so it's possible they will be moving to another public park here in the metro area. so definitely it's been a long weekend. they were given an eviction notice to move out of those three parks on thursday. they were given that notice. and now they had been moved out. but now here in one of our downtown parks in the pioneer courthouse square area.

>> jessica marquette from koin, we appreciate your reporting. we want to tell our viewers, you are seeing that box at the bottom of the screen. we're paying attention to the president of the united states. he's in honolulu, hawaii. he's going to speak any minute. when he does, we're going to take his comments live. he's hosting an apec summit in honolulu. the president of the united states live just as soon as he comes up to the podium. let's move on and talk about the occupy movement. police in portland wasted little time tearing down those camps we mentioned. earlier this evening i spoke with one of the protesters and the mayor about the police action. >> we worked really hard to keep the peace here in portland. this is our fifth -- fourth or fifth police action. there's not been any serious injuries. we've not used tear gas or rubber bullets or those kinds of things. we work really hard, even in passionate moments like you are seeing now to make sure that the coolest heads prevail. and i want to really give a

shout-out to the portland police bureau for their professionalism and also the organizers of occupy portland who work really hard as well to keep the peace. >> we feel strong that this community supports us and we feel -- i'm sorry, i should say that i can't speak on behalf of occupy portland. i can only speak on behalf of myself. but i feel like i am extremely disappointed eed that the mayo chose to crack down on these supports when the outpouring from the community was so strong and clearly in favor of occupy portland. >> all right. now to denver. denver police force occupy denver out of the civic center. they dance in the street while police tore down streets. 17 people were arrested in that situation. a similar story unfolding in philadelphia. a man was arrested after a woman was sexually assaulted within the occupy philly camp here city hall. the encampment is preventing a $50 million renovation project from starting keeping many

people from working. fires, public urination, graffiti, all are taking a toll on the histor area. philadelphia's mayor says the people who started the movement have left. >> occupy philly has changed. we're seeing serious health and safety issues playing out on almost a daily basis. occupy philly is fractured with internal disagreement and disputes. the people of occupy philly have also changed, and their intentions have changed. and all of this is not good for philadelphia. >> also tonight on cnn, behind the scenes. drama from saturday night's gop debate. details on the accidental e-mail that republican presidential candidate michele bachmann is crying media bias over. in the meantime, we're going to go back to honolulu, hawaii, where the president of the united states is expected to give a press conference at any moment. our white house correspondent

dan lothian is standing by as we await the president to come to the podium. dan, we got a two-minute warning just about 1 1/2 minutes ago and we see the president walking up in the background. >> that's right. >> and he's going to hit the -- >> he's coming out right now. again, he'll be -- he'll be taking about six to eight questions. oh, i'll sit down and let the president begin. >> so there's the president of the united states. we're going to listen in to president barack obama in honolulu, hawaii. >> i want to begin by thanking the people of hawaii for their extraordinary hospitality. usually when michelle and i and our daughters come back to visit, it's just one president and this time we brought 21. so thank you so much for the incredible graciousness of the people of hawaii and their patience because i know that traffic got tied up a little bit. now the single greatest

challenge for the united states right now, and my highest priority as president is creating jobs and putting americans back to work. and one of the best ways to do that is to increase our trade and exports with other nations. 95% of the world's consumers are beyond our borders. i want them to be buying goods with three words stamped on them. "made in america." so i've been doing everything i can to make sure that the united states is competing aggressively for the jobs and the markets of the future. no region will do more to shape our long-term economic future than the asia-pacific region. as i've said, the united states is and always will be a pacific nation. many of our top trading partners are in this region. this is where we sell most of our exports, supporting some 5 million american jobs. and since this is the world's fastest growing region, the asia

pacific is key to achieving my goal of doubling u.s. exports. a goal, by the way, which we are on track right now to meet. and that's why i've been proud to host apec this year. it's been a chance to help lead the way toward a more seamless regional economy with more trade, more exports and more jobs for our people. and i'm pleased that we've made progress in three very important areas. first, we agreed to a series of steps that will increase trade and bring our economies even closer. we agreed to a new set of principles on innovation, to encourage the entrepreneurship that creates new businesses and new industries. with simplified customs and exemptions from certain tariffs, we'll encourage more businesses to engage in more trade. and that includes our small businesses which account for the vast majority of the companies in our economies. we agreed to a new initiative that will make it easier and faster for people to travel and

conduct business across the region. and yesterday i was pleased to sign legislation, a new travel cart that will help our american businessmen and women travel more easily and get deals done in this region. i note that we also made a lot of progress increasing trade on the sidelines of apec. as i announced yesterday, the united states and our eight partners reached the broad outlines of an agreement on the trans-pacific partnership. and today i'm pleased that japan, canada and mexico have now expressed an interest in this effort. this comes on the heels of our landmark trade agreements with south korea, panama and colombia which will support tens of thousands of american jobs. and in my meet with president medvedev, we discussed how to move ahead with russia's accession to the wto which will also mean more exports for american manufacturers and american farmers and ranchers. second, apec agreed on ways to promote the green growth we need

for our energy security. we agreed to reduce tariffs on environmental goods and make it easier to export clean energy technologies that create green jobs. we raised the bar on ourselves and will aim for even higher energy efficiencies. and we're moving ahead with the effort to phase out fossil fuel subsidies. this would be a huge step toward creating clean energy, economies and fighting climate change which is a threat to both the beauty and the prosperity of the region. third, we're redoubling our efforts to make sure that regulations are encouraging trade and job creation, not discouraging trade and job creation. and this builds on the work that we're doing in the united states to get rid of rules and regulations that are unjustified and that are overly burdensome. our apec partners are joining us in streamlining and coordinating regulations so we're sparking innovation and growth even as we protect public health and our environment.

and finally, since many of the leaders here were also at the recent g-20 summit, we continued our efforts to get the global economy to grow faster. apec makes up more than half the global economy and it will continue to play a key role in achieving the strong and balanced growth that we need. as i've said, as the world's largest economy, the best thing that the united states can do for the global economy is to grow our own economy faster. and so i will continue to fight for the american jobs act so that we can put our people back to work. i was glad to see that congress moved forward on one aspect of the jobs bill, tax credits for companies that are hiring veterans. but we've got to do a lot more than that. so again, i want to thank the people of hawaii for their extraordinary hospitality and for all that they've done to help make this summit such a success. i want to thank my fellow leaders for the seriousness and sense of common purpose they brought to your work, and i believe that the progress we

made here will help create jobs and keep america competitive in a region that is absolutely vital, not only for our economy but also for our national security. so with that, i'm going to take a few questions. i'll start with ben feller of ap. >> thank you very much, mr. president. i picked the sun here. so i'd like to ask you about iran. did you get any specific commitments from russia or china on tightening sanctions? did you move them at all? and do you fear the world is running out of options short of military intervention to keep iran from getting nuclear weapons? >> one of the striking things over the last three years since i came into office is the degree of unity that we've been able to forge in the international community with respect to iran. and when i came into office, the world was divided and iran was unified around its nuclear

program. we now have a situation where the world is united and iran is isolated. and because of our diplomacy and our efforts, we have, by far, the strongest sanctions on iran that we've ever seen. and china and russia were critical to making that happen. have they not been willing to support those efforts in the united nations, we would not have been able to see the progress we've been making. all our intelligence indicates iran's economy is suffering as a consequence of that. and we're also seeing that iran's influence in the region has ebbed in part because their approach to repression inside of iran is contrary to the arab spring that has been sweeping the middle east. so we are in a much stronger position now than we were two or three years ago with respect to

iran. having said that, the recent iaea report indicates what we already knew, which is, although iran does not possess a nuclear weapon, and is, you know, technically still allowing iaea observers into their country, that they are engaging in a series of practices that are contrary to their international obligations and their iaea obligations. and that's what the iaea report indicated. so what i did was to speak with the president medvedev as well as president hu and all three of us entirely agree on the objective, which is making sure that iran does not weaponize nuclear power and that we don't trigger a nuclear arms race in the region. that's in the interest of all of us. in terms of how we move forward, we will be consulting with them carefully over the next several

weeks to look at what other options we have available to us. the sanctions have enormous bite and enormous scope. and we're building off the platform that has already been established. the question is are there additional measures that we can take and we're going to explore every avenue to see if we can solve this issue diplomatically. i have said reportedly, and i will say today, we are not taking any options off the table because it's my firm belief that iran with a nuclear weapon would pose a security threat, not only to the region but also to the united states. but our strong preference is to have iran meet its international obligations, negotiate diplomatally to allow them to have peaceful use of nuclear energy in accordance with international law, but at the

same time, fore swear the weaponization of nuclear. and they have the same aims be objectives and i believe we'll continue to cooperate and collaborate closely on that issue. dan lothian? >> thank you, mr. president. last night of the republican debate, they -- some of the hopefuls -- they hope to get your job -- they defended the practice of waterboarding which is a practice that you banned in 2009. herman cain said, quote, i don't see that as torture. michele bachmann said that it's, quote, very effective. so i'm wondering if you think that they are uninformed, out of touch or irresponsible? >> that's a multiple choice question, isn't it?

let me just say this. they're wrong. waterboarding is torture. it's contrary to america's traditions. it's contrary to our ideals. that's not who we are. that's not how we operate. we don't need it in order to prosecute the war on terrorism. and we did the right thing by ending that practice. if we want to lead around the world, part of our leadership is setting a good example. and anybody who has actually read about and understands the practice of waterboarding would say that that is torture. and that's not something we do. period. nora o'donnell. >> thank you, mr. president. if i could continue on that.

the republicans did have a debate on cbs last night. a lot of it was about foreign policy. and they were very critical of your record. >> that's shocking. >> so if i could get you to respond to something that mitt romney said. he said your biggest foreign policy failure is iran. he said that if you are re-elected, iran will have a nuclear weapon. is mitt romney wrong? >> i am going to make a practice of not commenting on whatever is said in republican debates until they've got an actual nominee. but as i indicated to ben in the earlier question, you take a look at what we've been able to accomplish in mobilizing the world community against iran over the last three years, and

it shows steady, determined, firm progress in isolating the iranian regime and sending a clear message that the world believes it would be dangerous for them to have a nuclear weapon. now is this an easy issue? no. anybody who claims it is, is either politicking or doesn't know what they are talking about. but i think not only the world but the iranian regime understands very clearly how determined we are to prevent not only a nuclear iran but also a nuclear arms race in the region. and a violation of nonproliferation norms that would have implications around the world, including in the asia

pacific region where we have similar problems with north korea. david nakamura. >> thank you, mr. president. yesterday in a speech before business leaders, you said that you want china to play by the rules. and then your staff later said that in a bilateral meeting with president hu that you expressed that american business leaders are growing frustrated with the pace of change in china's economy. what rules is china not playing by? what specific steps do you need to see from china? and what punitive actions is your administration willing to take as you said it would yesterday if china does not play by the rules? >> well, first of all, i also said yesterday that we welcome the peaceful rise of china. it is in america's interest to see china succeed in lifting hundreds of millions of people out of poverty.

china can be a source of stability and help to underwrite international norms and codes of conduct. and so what we've done over the last two years is to try to develop a frank, consistent open relationship and dialogue with china. and it's yielded considerable benefits. for example, you know, support for issues like iran. but what i've also said to chinese leadership since i came into office, when it comes to their economic practices, there are a range of things that they have done that disadvantage not just the united states but a whole host of their trading partners and countries in the region. the most famous example is the

issue of china's currency. most economists estimate that the rmb is devalued by 20% to 25%. that means our exports to china are that much more expensive and their imports into the united states are that much more cheaper. now there's been slight improvement over the last year. partly because of u.s. pressure, but it hasn't been enough. and it's time for them to go ahead and move towards a market-based system for their currency. we recognize they may not be able to do it overnight, but they can do it much more quickly than they've done it so far. and by the way, that would not necessarily be a bad thing for the chinese economy because they've been so focused on export-driven growth that they've neglected domestic consumption, building up domestic markets. it makes them much more vulnerable to shocks in the

global economy. it throws the whole world economy out of balance because they're not buying as much as they could be from other countries. and this is not something that's inconsistent with where chinese leadership say they want to go. the problem is that you've got a bunch export producers in china who like the system as it is. and making changes are difficult for them politically. i get it. but the united states and other countries, i think, understandably feel that enough is enough. that's not the only concern we have. intellectual property rights and protections. companies that do business in china consistently report problems in terms of intellectual property not being protected. now that's particularly important for an advanced economy like ours. where that's one of our

competitive advantages is we've got great engineers. great entrepreneurs. we're designing extraordinary new products. and if they get no protection and the next thing you know, china's operating as the low-cost producer and not paying any fees or revenues to folks who invented these products, that's a problem. so those are two examples, but there are a number of others. these practices aren't secret. i think everybody understands that they've been going on for quite some time. sometimes american companies are wary about bringing them up because they don't want to be punished in terms of their ability to do business in china. but i don't have that same concern. so i bring it up. and in terms of enforcement, the other thing that we've been doing is actually trying to enforce the trade laws that are in place. we've brought a number of cases,

one that the u.s. press may be familiar with are the cases involving u.s. tires where we brought very aggressive actions against china and won. and as a consequence, u.s. producers are in a better position, and that means more u.s. jobs. so i think we can benefit from trade with china, and i want certainly to continue cultivating a constructive relationship with the chinese government. but we're going to continue to be firm in insisting that they operate by the same rules that everybody else operates under. we don't want them taking advantage of the united states or u.s. businesses. jake tapper.

>> thank you, mr. president. the other day you told espn that the scandal at penn state which you said was heartbreaking should prompt some soul searching throughout the nation. i'm wondering if you could elaborate on that, what exact you you meant. i know you are a big fan of college sports if this is something you think is an indictment not just of what happened at penn state allegedly but how athletics are revered in universities. >> well, i think that's the kind of soul searching that i was referring to, jake. you're right. i'm a big college sports fan. i think that when it's kept in perspective, college athletics not only provides a great outlet for competition but helps to build a sense of community and can help to brand a university in a way that is fun and

important. but what happened at penn state indicates that at a certain point folks start thinking about institutions and don't think about individuals. and when you think about how vulnerable kids are for the alleged facts of that case to have taken place and for folks not to immediately say nothing else matters except making sure those kids are protected. that's a problem. it's not unique to a college sports environment. i mean, we've seen problems in

other institutions that are equally heartbreaking. not all of them involve children, by the way. there have been problems, obviously, with respect to sexual abuse or assault directed against women where institutions sort of closed ranks instead of getting on top of it right away. and that's why i said i think all institutions, not just universities or sports programs have to step back and take stock. and make sure that we're doing everything we can to protect people who may be vulnerable in these circumstances, but also just keep in mind what's important. keeping and making sure our excitement about a college sports program doesn't get in the wave our basic human response when somebody is being hurt. it's been said that evil can

thrive in the world just by good people standing by and doing nothing. and, you know, all of us, i think, have occasion where we see something that's wrong. we've got to make sure that we step up. and that's true in college athletics. that's true in government. that's true everywhere. juliana goldman. >> thank you, mr. president. in conversations you've had over the past couple of days with asian-pacific leaders have about of them brought up the rhetoric we're seeing from republican presidential candidates when it comes to china? and does that kind of rhetoric or posturing jeopardize the progress that your administration has made with china and the asia-pacific region as a whole? >> i think most leaders here

understand that politics is not always measured or on the level. and so most of our discussions have to do with substance. how do we put our people back to work right now? how do we expand trade? how do we expand exports? you know, i've been very frank with chinese leaders, though in saying that the american people across the board, left, right and center, believe in trade. believe in competition. we think we've got the best workers in the world. we think we've got the best universities, the best entrepreneurs. the best free market. we're ready to go out there and compete with anybody. but there is a concern across the political spectrum that the playing field is not level right now. and so, you know, in

conversations with president hu and others, what i've tried to say is we have the opportunity to move in a direction in which this is a win-win. china's benefiting from trade with the united states. the united states is benefiting as well. jobs are being created in the united states and not just in china. but right now things are out of kilter. and that is something that is shared across the board as we saw with the recent vote on the chinese currency issue in the senate. and i think leaders in the region understand that as china grows, as economic influence expands, that the expectation is

that they will be a responsible leader in the world economy. which is what the united states has tried to do. i mean, we tried to set up rules that are universal, that everybody can follow and then we play by those rules and then compete fiercely. but we don't try to game the system. that's part of what leadership is about. china has the opportunity to be that same type of leader. and as the world's second largest economy, i think that's going to be important not just for this region but for the world. but that requires them to take responsibility. to understand that their role is different now than it might have been 20 years ago or 30 years ago. where if they were breaking some rules, it didn't really matter. it did not have a significant impact. you weren't seeing huge trade

imbalance imbalances that had consequences for the world financial system. now they've grown up. and so, you know, they're going to help manage this process in a responsible way. laura meckler? >> thank you, mr. president. why did you get rid of the aloha shirts and the grass skirts? are you at all concerned it appears it's a party over here while others are living with a tough economy and i wonder if that was on your mind when you were planning this trip which takes you to some fun and exotic locations. >> i got rid of the hawaiian shirts because i looked at pictures of some of the previous apec meetings and some of the

garb that had appeared previously and i thought this may be a tradition that we might want to break. i suggested the to leaders -- we gave them a shirt. if they wanted to wear the shirt, i promise you it would have been fine. but i didn't hear a lot of complaints about us breaking precedent on that one. with respect to this trip, look. this is a pretty nice piece of scenery here. and, you know, i take enormous pride in having been raised in the state of hawaii. but we're here for business. we're here to create jobs. we're here to promote exports. and we have got a set of tangible concrete steps that have been taken that are going to make our economy stronger. and that's part of what our leadership has been about.

when i went to europe last week, our job was to help shape a solution for the european crisis. and a lot of folks back home might have wondered, well, that's europe's problem. why are we worrying about it? well, if europe has a major recessi recession, then the financial system in europe starts spinning out of control, that will have a direct impact on u.s. growth and our ability to create jobs and people raising their living standards. the same is true out here. if we're not playing out here in the world's largest regional economy and the world's fastest regional economy, if we have abandoned the field and we're not engaged, american businesses and -- will lose out and those jobs won't be in the united states of america. so part of my job is to make

sure that the rules of the road are set up so our folks can compete effectively. part of my job is to sell america and our products and our services around the world. and i think we've done so very effectively. and as i said, just to take the example of exports, we're on track to double our exports since i came into office. i mean, that was a goal i set. we're on track to meet it. that's actually been one of the stronger parts of our economic growth over the last couple of years and i want to make sure we keep driving that. chuck todd. >> thank you, mr. president. the republican co-chair of the super committee jeff hensarling went on tv today and said if the sequester happened, this idea of

the automatic cuts there was plenty of motivation to change the make-up of these automatic cuts. i know you had a conversation with him about this and said that was changing it in any way was off the table. that means you're going to veto this bill if that's the case if it ends up they can't get a deal in the next ten days. and then can you clarify your end of the hot mike conversation with french president nicolas sarkozy as it involved the israeli prime minister netanyahu. >> can i just say that chuck is the only guy who asked two questions so far. so just -- when i cut off here, whoever was next in the queue -- i'm mess with you, chuck. with respect to the super

committee, in august, we negotiated to initiate a trillion dollars in cuts over the next ten years. primarily out of discretionary spending, but we also said that in order for us to move towards a more stable, fiscal condition that we're going to have to get an additional 1.2 minimum. i actually argued that we needed more than that. and the whole idea of the sequester was to make sure that both sides felt obligated, move off rigid positions and do what was required to help the country. since that time they've had a lot of conversations but it feels as if people can stick with their rigid positions rather than solve the problem. now i've put forward a very

detailed approach that would achieve $3 trillion-plus in savings. and it's the sort of balanced approach that the american people prefer. it says everything is on the table. we've got to have discretionary spending cuts of the sort we've already put in place. we've got to have nondefense cuts. we've got to have defense cuts. we're going to have to look at entitlement programs. we've got to reduce our health care costs. and we're going to need additional revenue. and when we're talking about revenue, if we've got to raise money it makes sense for us to start by asking the wealthiest among us to pay a little bit more before we start asking seniors, for example, to pay a lot more for their medicare. now this is the same

presentation that i made to speaker boehner back in august. it's the same kind of balanced approach that every single independent committee that's looked at this has said needs to be done. and it just feels as if people keep on wanting to jigger the math so that they get a different outcome. well, the equation, no matter how you do it it is going to be the same. if you want a balanced approach that doesn't gut medicare and medicaid, doesn't prevent us from making investments in education and basic science and research, all the things we've been talking about here at apec that every world leader understands is the key for long-term economic success, then proven cuts have to be matched up with revenue. my hope is that over the next

several days the congressional leadership on the supercommittee go ahead and bite the bullet and go ahead and do what needs to be done because the math won't change. there's no magic formula. there are no magic beans you can toss on the ground and suddenly a bunch of money grows on trees. we've got to just go ahead and do the responsible thing. and i am prepared to sign legislation that is balanced that solves this problem. one other thing that i want to say about this. when i meet with world leaders, what's striking, whether it's in europe or here in asia, the kinds of fundamental reforms and both on the revenue side and the

public pension side that countries are having to make are so much more significant than what we need to do in order to get our books in order. this doesn't require radical changes to america or its way of life. it just means that we spread out the sacrifice across every sector so that it's fair. so that people don't feel as if once again, people are well connected. people who have lobbyists, special interests, get off easy and the burden is placed on middle class families that are already struggling. so if other countries can do it we can do it. and we can do it in a responsible way. i'm not going to comment on whether i veto a particular bill until i actually see a bill. because i still hold out the process that there's going to be

a light bulb moment where everybody says, ah-ha. here's what we've got to do. with respect to the hot mike in france, i'm not going to comment on conversations that i have with individual leaders, but what i will say is this. the primary conversation i had with president sarkozy in that meeting revolved around my significant disappointment that france had voted in favor of the palestinians joining unesco. knowing full well that under our laws that would require the united states from cutting off funding to unesco. and after i had consistently made the argument that the only

way we're going to solve the middle east situation is if palestinians and israelis sit down at the table and negotiate. that it is not going to work to try and do an end run through the united nations. so i had a very frank and firm conversation with president sarkozy about that issue. and that is consistent with both private and public statements that i've been making to everybody over the last several months. ed henry. >> mr. president, i have three questions. starting with mitt romney. just one question. i promise. you started with a $447 billion jobs bill. two months later, many speeches later, you've got virtually nothing from that. you've got the veterans jobs bill which is important, obviously. and a lot of executive orders.

but your coming to the realization that you may just get nothing here and go to the american people in 2012 without another jobs bill, 9% unemployment and then wondering about your leadership, sir? >> well, i think first all of, the american people at this point are wondering about congressional leadership in failing to pass the jobs bill, the components of which the majority of americans, including many republicans think are a good idea. and that's part of the reason why the american people right now aren't feeling real good about congress. normally, by the way, the way politics works is if the overwhelming majority of the american people aren't happy with what you're doing, you start doing something different. so far that has not happened in

congress. and the republicans in congress in particular. they don't seem to have that same sense of urgency about needing to put people back to work. i'm going to keep on pushing. my expectation is that we will get some of that done now and i'll keep on pushing until we get all of it done. and that may take me all the way until november to get it all done. and it may take a new congress to get it all done. but the component parts, cutting taxes for middle class families. cutting taxes for small businesses that are hiring our veterans and thirg long-term unemployed. putting teachers back in the classroom. here in the state of hawaii, you have a bunch of kids who are going to school four days a week because of budget problems. how are we going to win the competition for -- in the 21st century with our kids going to school basically half time?

the jobs bill would help alleviate those budget pressures at the state level. rebuilding our infrastructure. every world leader that you talk to, they are saying to themselves, how can we make sure we have a first class infrastructure. and as you travel through the asia-pacific region, you see china having better airports than us. singapore having superior ports to ours. well, that's going to impact our capacity to do business here. our capacity to trade. our capacity to get u.s. products made by u.s. workers into the fastest growing market in the world. and, by the way, we can put a lot of people back to work at the same time. so i'm going to keep on pushing, and my expectation is that we will just keep chipping away at this. if you are asking me, do i anticipate that the republican leadership in the house or the senate suddenly decide that i

was right all along and they will adopt 100% of my proposals? the answer is no. i don't expect that. do i anticipate that at some point they recognize that doing nothing is not an option? that's my hope. and that should be their hope, too. because if they don't, i think we'll have a different set of leaders in congress. all right. thank you very much, everybody. thank you. >> president obama wrapping up a press conference. we'll have complete analysis of all the questions and answers the president took. everything from iran sanctions to penn state, the child sex scandal going on there, the jobs bill, a hot mike. hawaiian shirts. complete analysis on the other side of this break. life insurance companies

treat you like a policy, not a person. instead of getting to know you they simply assign you a number. aviva is here to change all that. we're bringing humanity back to insurance and putting people before policies. aviva life insurance and annuities. we are building insurance around you. hey, it's sandra -- from accounting. peter. i can see that you're busy... but you were gonna help us crunch the numbers for accounts receivable today. i mean i know that this is important. well, both are important. let's be clear. they are but this is important too. [ man ] the receivables. [ male announcer ] michelin knows it's better for xerox to help manage their finance processing.

so they can focus on keeping the world moving. with xerox, you're ready for real business.

two of the most important are energy security and economic growth. north america actually has one of the largest oil reserves in the world. a large part of that is oil sands. this resource has the ability to create hundreds of thousands of jobs. at our kearl project in canada, we'll be able to produce these oil sands with the same emissions as many other oils and that's a huge breakthrough. that's good for our country's energy security and our economy. i tell you what i can spend. i do my best to make it work. i'm back on the road safely. and i saved you money on brakes. that's personal pricing.

back now with more analysis on the president's speech. dan, we thought he was going to go till the top of the hour to make our jobs a little easier but he gave us to time to talk. seriously here, the question about waterboarding came up last night in the debates. the president got a question about it as well, from you. what did you think of his response? >> well, i thought it was a very direct response. i was asking him to comment on whether or not he thought it was irresponsible among other things when herman cain and michele bachmann and others said that they supported waterboarding. and take a listen to how the president was very blunt in his response to my question. >> let me just say this. they're wrong. waterboarding is torture. it's contrary to america's traditions. it's contrary to our ideals. it's not who we are. that's not how we operate.

we don't need it in order to prosecute the war on terrorism. and we did the right thing by ending that practice. if we want to lead around the world, part of our leadership is setting a good example. and anybody who has actually read about and understands the practice of waterboarding would say that that is torture. and that's not something we do. period. >> now the president was also asked a question about the republicans targeting him on iran. he did not take that question at all. in fact, suggesting that he did not want to weigh in on what the republicans were saying until they had settled on their candidate. the president, though, his -- the theme of this press conference if you will, at least at the top, was the president

talking about how his number one goal is to create more jobs at home to lower that unemployment rate. and he won't stop until he sees more and more goods that have stamped on them three words, made in america. >> dan lothian in honolulu. dan, thanks very much. i want to bring in cnn contributor david frum. you heard dan saying this is mostly about the economy. that's why the president is there. he said the best way to put people back to work is to increase trade around the world. that's what the mission is here. >> well, that's, of course, an important and worthwhile mission. trade, however, contributes over the long term. it doesn't offer any kind of an immediate response. the country's economic difficulties. we all want to see a stronger international trade regime, especially since it looks like the whole wto system is breaking down. and we're going back instead to country by country deals. >> yeah. i thought it was interesting, too, at the very end he got a question about his $447 billion

jobs bill. you started with a $447 billion jobs bill. you've hardly gotten anything that you wanted. is it time? do you think now that this is going to be your legacy, that you aren't going to be able to accomplish anything? the president said i'm going to keep trying up until november of next year to try to get all of this done. >> what's so disappointing with the president's most recent jobs proposal is it includes a lot of things that are good ideas. but the president insisted on tethering his ideas, many of which, as he said, have been accepted by republicans in the past to a tax increase he had to know was going to be unacceptable to republicans. it raises the cynical thought, was he trying to get to no? is the no more useful to him than the yes? think of it this way. supposing the republicans had said yes to everything he proposed, the effect of those measures would have kicked in quite late in 2012 and still wouldn't have made much of a dent in the unemployment numbers by voting day of 2012. what he now has is not a slow

acting jobs bill that wild -- th he has an issue. unemployment would go away if only they had exceeded. but he made sure they wouldn't by attaching the job proposals to tax measures. >> and that's going to have to be the last word. david frum, thank you for joining us. thank you for joining us tonight, viewers. i'll see you back here next weekend. good night. i trade on tradearchitect. this is web-based trading, re-visualized. streaming, real-time quotes. earnings analysis. probability analysis: that's what opportunity looks like. it's all visual. intuitive. and it's available free, wherever the web is. this is how trade strategies are built. tradearchitect. only from td ameritrade. welcome to better trade commission free for 60 days when you open an account.