thank you for joining me tonight. i appreciate it. >> you're very welcome, piers. thank you for having me on. >> "ac 360" starts right now. ja and roger moore, 007 himself. >> we begin tonight with late word that president obama will speak to the nation tomorrow, making a brief statement from the east room at 1:00 p.m. eastern on the economy. that issue of the economy directly touches on the dysfunction in washington that americans said they hate. they went to bed election night hoping to fix that. speed really matters here. in just seven weeks the bush tax cuts expire, automatic spending cuts agreed to by both parties kick in. we call it the fiscal cliff and even though it's more like the fiscal steep slope it could do some very bad things to the economy. concerns about rolling down it or falling off it or whatever you want to call it have made markets nervous and credit rating agencies and economists of all stripes are warning about the consequences of not hammering out a deal in time. politicians in both parties,

they've been sending out mixed signals ever since the election. on the one hand they're talking about common ground. take a look. >> we want our children to live in america that isn't burdened by debt. that isn't threatened by a warming planet. >> the nation as you know is at a critical point. at a time like this, we can't risk partisan bickering and political posturing. >> if there's a mandate in yesterday's results it's a mandate for us to find a way to work together on the solutions to the challenges that we all face as a nation. >> it's better to dance than to fight. it's better to work together. everything doesn't have to be a fight. >> sounds promising, right? but that's not all they're saying. tonight on abz house speaker boehner ruled out any deal that lets any tax rates go up. >> raising tax rates is unacceptable. and frankly, it couldn't even pass the house. i'm not sure it can pass the senate.

>> vice president biden, meantime, told reporters off camera the voters gave democrats a clear mandate on taxes by re-electing a president who promised the following over and over again. >> another $5 trillion tax cut that favors the wealthy is not change. i'm not going to turn medicare into a voucher just to pay for another millionaire's tax cut. i'm going to lower taxes for middle class folks. let's also make sure the wealthiest households pay a little bit more. >> keeping them honest, americans did vote for that by a slim majority in the popular vote and comfortable majority in the electoral college. they also increased the democratic lead in the senate. however, they preserve republican control of the house so no matter how ugly you think the tone in washington has been over the last four years, no matter how childishly you think a lot of lawmakers have acted on a structural level, who controls what, there may be less change than meets the eye which is why what you'll be hearing in washington in the coming weeks may sound less like this -- >> everything doesn't have to be a fight. everything doesn't have to be a fight. >> -- and more like this.

more like each side getting ready for an epic fight. >> i do not think we should be raising taxes, especially when the country is on the brink of a recession. >> can you have a compromise? >> yes. >> that was a gasp before you said yes. that scares me. >> i will spend every moment in the senate working to help lead the effort to stop that. >> another round of tax breaks for very wealthy people will somehow trickle down. we know that doesn't work. >> the president wants to raise taxes. raise taxes on the wealthiest 2% of americans. my principle would be mr. president, we're not going to help you to get that done. >> olympia snowe is the outgoing republican senator from maine, a moderate. she says she is retiring in part because of dysfunction in washington. the senator joins me now. senator, you recently said senators should be individually and collectively embarrassed, those were your words, about their failure to work together to address big issues. based on the rhetoric we are hearing now from both sides, do you have any faith they are going to be able to do that, to work together to avoid this fiscal cliff? >> well, i certainly hope so,

anderson. it does not bode well based on what the president said on the eve of his election. as well as what speaker boehner addressed in his own remarks yesterday, and i know the president's going to be making a speech tomorrow. but it's critical that we begin to do so as soon as possible. the more we prolong the uncertainty and unpredictability, the more likely we are going to invite or trigger a financial crisis. we've seen what's happening even on the stock market. we never know. i think that's the point here. and the sooner that we can get back on track in helping the economy, helping businesses to make decisions for the future that would help to generate economic growth, the better off we will be. but the uncertainty is certainly a dangerous -- is dangerous and we're in uncharted waters. >> do you see any real signs of a willingness to compromise? it seems like compromise has become a dirty word in washington and you know, even

speaker boehner, you know, basically gave an interview in which he said that obama care is the law of the land and then kind of walked it back after a tea party group went ballistic about it. >> well, one thing i know from this election and certainly i think we should all have learned is that people want bipartisanship and they understand that compromise is absolutely invaluable ingredient to getting things done. we have an obligation to be problem solvers. now more than ever, given the tenuous nature of our times and the situation that we're in as a country. i describe it as not just any moment. we're at a tipping point. so it's crucial and i think the president should invite the leadership in both the house and the senate to sit down to begin to sketch out an agenda and a framework by which we're going to address these issues in the lame duck sessions. >> have republicans figured out how to move forward? there are extremes in your party just as there are extremes in the democratic party, a

different kind of extreme but let's talk about the republican party. there are extremes in the republican party and it seems like a lot of republican leaders who are not on the extreme have a hard time even calling out the extreme, or having an open discussion about it. >> well, that's why their leaders are going to have to take those positions in doing what is right. obviously they represent the caucuses, you know, they're elected by their caucuses but sometimes they are also going to have to stand up and say we have to move forward, and we have to do that. i've worked with six presidents and it certainly worked that way with president reagan. they had to build coalitions in order to get things done. he didn't get everything he wanted but he got some of what he wanted, the most important things. so both sides have to understand it and reach accommodation. there's no other way to do it in the united states senate. after all, you need 60 votes. if you need 60 votes, that means both sides have to get together and you have to make concessions. the american people understand that.

they know that you have to, you know, solve problems and that you're going to have to reach consensus and compromise in order to do so. >> senator snowe, appreciate it. thank you. >> thank you. how much of the problems in washington stem from instability and extremism and how much is it simply a matter of structural divisions that the latest election did little to change. we are joined by mark mckinnon, moderate republican who has been a member of both major parties and co-founded a movement called no labels dedicated to bipartisanship and civil discourse in politics. he's also been a national song writer which puts him in pretty good company. also with us, political analyst david gergen and gloria borger. gloria, let me start with you. you think the onus is on the president to set the tone here. do you think that's because he bears more responsibility in this situation than the republicans or because he's got a better ability as president to set the tone? >> you know, he just got re-elected as president of the united states. i think when you're president, it's incumbent upon you, we are going to hear from him tomorrow, to set the tone for negotiations, to extend the

olive branch and say you know what, i want to work with the folks on the other side of the aisle, i'm not saying that the president has to completely compromise with himself before he sits down at a table. i know he's not going to do that. but to me, anderson, the problem is, i was listening to olympia snowe, the problem is that nobody got punished for bad behavior in this election. everybody can take something away from it and say okay, the public is with me. >> yeah, but david, to gloria's point, all this election we heard from both candidates, mitt romney and from president obama and from all their supporters that this was a very clear choice, that the choice couldn't be clearer between president obama who wanted to raise taxes on the wealthiest americans, mitt romney, who did not, and yet now that the choice has been made, all of a sudden we're hearing from a lot of republicans saying well, that's not the choice the american people made. >> anderson, i would respectfully say that both parties intentionally muddled the choice during the campaign. neither candidate set forward a

comprehensive agenda for dealing with the deficits and it's now incumbent on both parties to do that. i think we have no choice. i think gloria's right. the president ought to set the tone. i also think speaker boehner, speaker of the house, he's got to come forward. they, too, ought to be sitting down together along with two or three other leaders in the next 48 to 72 hours -- >> it doesn't sound like -- he made a statement about obama care being the law of the land, now he's walking that back because some tea party groups -- >> well, that's true. what we've got is a problem russell long described a long time ago, the senator. he said everybody in washington wants to go to heaven but nobody wants to do what it takes to get there. that's what we've got. they are all for compromise as long as it's on their terms. what you've got now and especially in the republican party, we've got an extreme element that is deeply dug in against no tax increases, period. we're going to go over the cliff, we have to. and you've got in the democratic party a group of people equally dug in on medicare and social security. we're not touching the benefits. for that, you can't get there to entitlement reform without that. the president has got to unlock

that now. that's what being elected to the second term. you know, look, the second term is not all about laurels and applause. it's about you got elected to do hard work. >> which is worse for republican law makers right now, the consequences of compromise or of failing to compromise? >> well, the consequences, anderson, will be if there's no action. what we saw across the board from no labels as we were campaigning across the country talking to candidates and talking to voters is that they don't care about partisan politics at this point. they just want the problems solved. americans understand that there's got to be give on both sides. so i'm encouraged actually that voters get it. they sent the message and i think our elected representatives know at the end of the day, i think there's a lot of posturing going on right now. i'm encouraged by what speaker boehner said about revenues. he may have hedged that a little bit in the last 24 hours and may want to see where he can get it from tax reform first, but ultimately, republicans are acknowledging which is a good sign that there has to be revenue as part of this deal.

same thing on the democratic side -- >> you think it's posture right now, some of this stuff we're hearing? >> i think it's what harry reid said. there's a lot of dancing going on but i think we'll get to the fixing pretty soon. >> gloria, everyone sees the fiscal cliff coming here. how much can congress get done in the lame duck especially if they are only going to give it a week or so? >> you know, that's a big question. look, there are two things to consider here. first of all is the question of the bush tax cuts for the wealthy expiring. the president has said that's going to happen and that's the real stumbling block here before you get even to the larger question of the fiscal cliff. everybody knows in the larger package, everybody wants to do tax reform. mitt romney proposed capping deductions, for example, during the campaign. that's something republicans might be able to sign on to. but before they even get to tax reform, they have to figure out how to get around this larger problem and you know, in talking to some democrats, chuck schumer has suggested redefine wealth. make it tax cuts expiring for people who earn over $1 million

a year, something like that. they just have to find a way to get around that. if they can do that, i think they can have a framework for everything else. >> mark, i'm curious to hear what you have to say because the republican party, i think i've heard you say in the past republican party has a problem with its brand right now. what lessons should they take from the results of the election, because if you listen to rush limbaugh, i was just reading the transcript of what he was saying, we don't have a demographic problem. the problem is not enough republicans came out and voted. so all this talk about the extremes and demographic problem is just not true. then i saw something saying sean hannity is now switching his position on immigration or evolving it and he says he's evolved today. >> well, i don't think the results could be any clearer, and to suggest that republicans didn't turn out, well, that's true they didn't turn out but part of the reason they didn't turn out is because a lot of them recognized there wasn't a

clear message coming from the republican party, that the brand has suffered a lot because of their failure to step forward and put forward clear plans, and to problem solve. the republicans just like democrats agree that we've got to solve these problems and they understand there's got to be a give so, you know, it's about stepping up to the plate, recognizing there's sacrifice on both parties, the need to be put on the table and i look forward to the president's remarks. i think he just should get everybody in the room, lock it up and get it done. >> good to have you on. let us know what you think. my twitter @andersoncooper. let's hear from you now. where does the tea party stand in the wake of tuesday's elections? michele bachmann, the tea party did not extend its raks in congress. where does the movement go from here? that's next. eóoç=ñp

president obama's re-election was obviously a loss for mitt romney, a bad one, but by extension, may have been an even bigger loss for the tea party. after all, paul ryan, a tea party favorite, couldn't deliver his own state of wisconsin for his ticket. he will return to his house seat to serve an eighth term. many tea party members kept their house seats as well but they didn't increase their ranks on tuesday, and they lost two very winnable senate races. it's a pretty big contrast to the splash they made in the 2010 midterm elections and the muscle they flexed throughout the prime primaries. here's gary tuchman. >> reporter: this is not the scene most supporters of the tea party envisioned or desired. barack obama was supposed to be a one-term president. >> liberty, yes. obama care, no. liberty, yes. obama care, no. >> reporter: a primary mission of the tea party, get the government out of people's lives. there was even an

african-american led chapter in south-central l.a. complete with a sign at one rally that read tea party supports mlk's dream. >> i see today that fidel castro likes obama care but we don't like obama care. doesn't that kind of tell you something? >> reporter: there was a lot of passion but also problems. there was christine o'donnell running for senate in delaware. years earlier, she had told bill maher she had dabbled in witchcraft and she delivered this line in a political ad. >> i'm not a witch. >> reporter: not only did she lose but some say this was an early sign of problems the gop would later have with untested tea party candidates. there were many other notable tea partiers in the limelight that year. sharon engle running for senate in nevada, tripped up when she said this to a group of latino teen agers. >> i don't know that all of you are latino. some of you look a little more asian to me. i don't know that. >> reporter: as the tea party increased its influence, speculation increased. former vice presidential candidate sarah palin won for

president. >> many of us today, that outrage, that moment of outrage, it came with the passage of obama care. >> reporter: ultimately, palin decided not to run for president in 2012. but friends of the tea party like newt gingrich, rick santorum, herman cain, rick perry and michele bachmann did. i caught up with bachmann at the minnesota state fair in 2010. she was running for re-election for congress and was at the height of her influence. >> i don't take it for granted. i don't take any election for granted. thank you. >> reporter: in 2012 not only did her support drop quickly in the presidential race, she barely won her congressional race this week. it was worse for two other tea party favorites. todd akin lost his senate race in missouri. his effort not helped by this comment. >> if it's a legitimate rape, the female body has ways to try to shut that whole thing down. >> reporter: and richard mourdock lost his senate race in indiana after he said this. >> even when life begins in that horrible situation of rape, that it is something that god intended to happen. >> reporter: the tea party's anti-government message

continues to resonate with many. but arguably, the group's policies and miscues might have cost the gop a chance to be the majority party in the u.s. senate. tea party supporters put together a video of what they expected to see this week. >> theteaparty.net is revolutionizing the movement. they think it's over. won't it be fun to see their faces on november 6th? >> reporter: as it turns out for them, it wasn't a lot of fun. gary tuchman, cnn, atlanta. in the wake of tuesday's losses, the tea party is taking heat from some republicans who believe the tea party's views on socialist views alienated voters and cost romney the election. it's complicated. here's what house speaker john boehner said today in an interview with abc news' diane sawyer. >> is the tea party going to be by your side through this? >> we've got members from all different types of -- all walks of life, if you will. >> do you think they come back changed by this election? >> listen, i think this has been the most misreported story

of my two years tenure. we don't have a tea party caucus to speak of in the house. all of us who were elected in 2010 were supported by the tea party. these are ordinary americans who have taken a more active role in our government. they want solutions. but we've all come a long way over the last two years, i think we all understand each other a lot better. >> we reached out to a number of tea party groups to be on the program, they declined. joining me now, former white house press secretary ari fleischer, unpaid occasional communications adviser to the romney campaign. also van jones, former special advisor to the obama white house. ari, what about that? is the tea party to blame for fielding some candidates who weren't ready for prime time, for some of the problems the republican party is having, or what? >> well, it's complicated and it varies from state to state. frankly, in missouri, where todd akin was a horrible candidate and said foolish, foolish things, he wasn't the tea party candidate. he actually ran against two tea party endorsed candidates.

they split the vote. he walked into the middle of it. so akin was more your traditional social conservative wing of the party. i don't think he's a traditional tea partier. and in 2010, the tea party's record was terribly mixed. they brought us on the one side marco rubio and senator ron johnson. to their credit. they defeated moderates. rubio defeated a moderate. he's a stellar senator. on the other hand, they brought us christine o'donnell and sharron angle in nevada, neither one of which was qualified to be a nominee, let alone a senator. my issue, i like the economic conservatism of the tea party. they are the ones reminding america that we are going broke. but in addition to having that message, they have to have good messengers. you cannot separate message from messenger. >> van, according to tuesday's exit polling, central tenet of the tea party that of less government is still alive, 51% say government is doing too much. can democrats make room, do they need to make room for policies that support that message? >> well, first of all, when we talk about the tea party, i think sometimes people just say

everything they don't like about the republican party, they just say that's the tea party. that's not fair. the tea party is one of the most impressive citizen movements in the history of the country. they have to be spoken with with a certain amount of respect. however, they have been i think harmful to the gop. the gop's big problem now is that they have backed themselves in this sort of demographic cul-de-sac where they just are a dwindling party at this point. they are not appealing broadly and some of the style and tone of the tea party has been very offensive to people of color, to women and it's going to make it harder for the gop to govern and harder for it to grow. that said, the other thing is that they were rejected this week at the ballot box. not that they didn't grow. key tea party heroes were voted out of office. alan west is gone, joe walsh is gone so i think they've got to really reconsider what they're doing. at the same time i think it would be a mistake for democrats to say that we can't work with anybody in the tea party. that's not true. or that the entire republican

party is just the tea party caucus. that's also not true. >> but ari, it seems like some of that not willing to compromise, some of that rhetoric came from tea party groups, that idea that if you're compromising you're giving up your principles and it's better to stand on principle, you know, damn the torpedos, full speed ahead. >> look, i don't think compromise is a dirty word. i think we have to get things done in washington. but when we have a debt the size of the debt we have, the tea party is really the ones who have woken us up to it and made us think this is the nation's number one problem and it must be tackled. we can't make the usual compromises of the past. we have to do fundamental big things. so i'm with them on that principle, focus on the debt, make meaningful, not temporary solutions to the debt. but at the end of the day, i do want to compromise. let me point one thing out. when you did have the boehner/obama compromise on debt limit, that was supported by two-thirds of house freshmen. only 50% of the democratic members voted for it. so there's also a bit of a mislabeling going on here. they did compromise on that debt

limit agreement. the liberal caucus in the democratic party was not as willing to compromise. >> but it's -- >> you have to look at it issue by issue, not paint with too broad a brush. >> but it is interesting specifically on obama care, speaker boehner said today obama care is here to stay, it's the law of the land. members of the tea party went ballistic and now he's walked that back. >> i think that's right. part of i think the challenge for the tea party is they talk a lot about liberty, they don't talk as much about liberty and justice for all. there's a sense that they have a very narrow, almost negative view of what american patriotism is all about. and for those of us who consider ourselves to be deep patriots who want to see the full promise of america realized, who love the statue of liberty and therefore love immigration and love imgrants and think we're a nation of immigrants, who are deep patriots who believe in america the beautiful and therefore want to defend america's environment against polluters, we find that we can't quite figure out how to be in a conversation about what it means to be an american with the tea

party ethic and theiretteos when they approach problems. it's tough for us to figure out how to work together and i think it's important. >> ari, just to the boehner example on obama care, is that an example where can a republican, leading republican now, fight back against the tea party if they so choose? if they wanted to, can they speak out against them? it seems there's a lot of people afraid to voice any opposition or have that public discussion. >> well, look, john boehner also today put the idea of taxes on the table. he has caught flack for that. at the end of the day it's the job of the president to split from the liberal base of his party and the job of the republicans to split from the most vociferous voice of the conservative movement if we're going to accomplish anything. no one is going to get everything they want in this new divided washington. what the american people are tired of is the nation fighting and everyone getting nothing. the tea party does make it more difficult for the speaker. on the other hand, the tea party are the ones who woke the

republican party up to the fact that we're a nation going broke and we really do have to take it on. >> ari, appreciate you being on. van jones as well. thanks very much. the obama campaign had a secret weapon it used to defeat mitt romney. highly technical sophisticated data mining operations. really fascinating. we will take a look at how it worked, kind of pull back the curtain, next.

first super storm sandy, now another storm. hundreds of thousands of new yorkers still left in the dark tonight. where is the power? what's being done to bring it back? i'll talk with a resident of

hard-hit staten island outraged at the situation.

up close tonight, a first look at the previously unknown secret operation the obama campaign used to defeat mitt romney. as you've heard about or as

you're about to learn, this operation was so highly organized, technical and computerized, could become a template for future campaigns. president obama spent months on the campaign trail of course but so did mitt romney. the president shook hands, posed for photos with voters. so did mitt romney. the obama campaign spent millions on radio and tv ads. obviously the romney campaign did, as well. so what was the ultimate difference between the two in terms of their operations? well, obama's data mining operation microtargeting voters. "time" magazine's white house correspondent michael scherer got an exclues ever inside look at the operation. he joins me now. michael, this is so fascinating stuff. this whole notion of microtargeting. explain what that is and what surprised you most about it? >> there are a lot of different things that fall under that umbrella but basically what happened is after 2008 the obama campaign came back together and said we want to do this the way we always wanted to. we are going to build this campaign from the ground up so they invested heavily early last year in a huge amount of technical support staff, analytic people, they had a

chief scientist, data base engineers and they really reengineered the whole democratic voter file so that it can now not just be a voter file for reaching voters, but it can include fund-raising information that they collected from donors, it could also include all the information they gathered online. it could be overlaid on social networks like facebook, and so they created basically a holistic system where they could not just target people, but figure out the best ways to target people, and so in practice what it meant was almost everything that was happening in the chicago headquarters, the whole campaign was being tested over and over again, analyzed for ways to improve things, and so even the smallest decisions like who to host a fund-raiser or what to put in an e-mail or how to design a web page was actually tested against data they had collected. >> you mentioned like george clooney, you could win a dinner with him and president obama and with sarah jessica parker in new york. that was tested out before those people were picked, correct? >> so what happened was they did

the clooney fund-raiser, obviously it was going to be a big draw, biggest hollywood star there is. it was enormously successful but they found when looking at the data to who was giving money to enter the drawing to appear at that dinner with george clooney, the demographic that was giving the most money were women between the ages of 40 and 49 and it was on the west coast. so they realized two things. one, this group, women ages 40 to 49, like entering these kind of contests and two, there's a regional aspect to this, that people who live near clooney's house are more interested in being part of this sort of a fund-raiser so when they went to look for a follow-up they had this information in their hands and they started looking for someone who they could use on the east coast. that's how sarah jessica parker came about. someone who would appeal to that group of people and who would be in the new york area to try and tap into a new group of donors. >> also, it's very scientific in terms of who they would have reach out to people in states, they learned it was better to have somebody from the state, from the area, reach out? >> yeah, that's right. one of the big insights from 2008 is the best way to get people to do things is to have

someone from their neighborhood, even better, someone they actually know, tell them to do it. and they actually used this not just in their field organizing but at the end of the campaign, they had thousands of people had signed up for facebook app for the campaign. when you signed up for the app you basically gave the campaign all the information about who your facebook friends were, they overlaid that data with their own data bases and they were then able to ask you to target the people they wanted to get at. so if you were part of this facebook app you were getting messages in the final days saying message your friends, you know, joe schmo in colorado or in texas, and when you did that, they knew because they tested this as well, that the likelihood that your friend joe would act on your recommendation, go vote, go register, early voting's open, whatever it was, was far higher than in the campaign just sent an e-mail. >> you think this changes the game for future campaigns? >> it definitely will. in four years the technology will probably be light years ahead. but it definitely changes the

game. it also, because you had an incumbent re-elected, they were able to invest all the millions of dollars they did in this, it puts democrats at a significant advantage and republicans do have a lot of catchup to do. >> not having a primary fight certainly helped out in that, devoting resources. appreciate it. fascinating stuff. >> thank you. coming up next, a number of people without power in new york is actually up from yesterday. as people shiver in the dark, they're boiling over at power companies and the government. we'll talk to one hard-hit resident when we continue. plaque psoriasis. i decided enough is enough. ♪ [ spa lady ] i started enbrel. it's clinically proven to provide clearer skin. [ rv guy ] enbrel may not work for everyone -- and may not clear you completely, but for many, it gets skin clearer fast, within 2 months, and keeps it clearer up to 9 months. [ male announcer ] because enbrel®, etanercept, suppresses your immune system, it may lower your ability to fight infections. serious, sometimes fatal, events including infections, tuberculosis, lymphoma, other cancers, and nervous system and blood disorders have occurred.

before starting enbrel, your doctor should test you for tuberculosis and discuss whether you've been to a region where certain fungal infections are common. don't start enbrel if you have an infection like the flu. tell your doctor if you're prone to infections, have cuts or sores, have had hepatitis b, have been treated for heart failure, or if, while on enbrel, you experience persistent fever, bruising, bleeding, or paleness. if you've had enough, ask your dermatologist about enbrel. he loves risk. but whether he's climbing everest,

scuba diving the great barrier reef with sharks, or jumping into the market, he goes with people he trusts, which is why he trades with a company that doesn't nickel and dime him with hidden fees. so he can worry about other things, like what the market is doing and being ready, no matter what happens, which isn't rocket science. it's just common sense, from td ameritrade. with the country he claims to lead in revolt, syria's dictator vows to live or die in

his homeland and issues a stark warning.

digging deeper, late word tonight that starting tomorrow, people in new york's five boroughs and long island's two counties will have to check their license plates before

trying to fill up with gas. officials announcing odd/even gas rationing to try and shrink the long gas lines and shortages that sprang up after sandy hit. new york mayor bloomberg saying only one in four city gas stations are open. that's not all. a week and a half since sandy, a day after a bad nor'easter, an awful lot of people, especially in new york and new jersey, still without power. 666,000 customers. that's actually up from yesterday, thanks to the nor'easter. people are cold, they're living in dark, damaged houses. they say they're getting the run-around from state and federal agencies and utility companies. listen to this woman who lives in staten island. >> where is the generator to heat, to plug in one heater and one light bulb? that i can survive? i'm a united states citizen. >> she's angry at con-ed and fema. fema says it has 15 relief centers across new york city but hopes to double that number by the weekend and have 50 centers up and running eventually. as for the power company in this case con-ed, there's a catch 22. they won't turn on the power until homeowners get their houses inspected for potentially

lethal wiring damage but electricians are hard to come by and the company isn't providing any. a company spokesman saying quote, utility companies like con edison don't have electricians. the people have to do that on their own. it's their home, their property, their equipment. this is a safety measure. nick camarota and his wife dianne join us from staten island. they are living along with their kids without power in a house heated only by propane stoves. i appreciate both of you being with us. you don't have power, you don't have gas. what are authorities saying to you? is there a plan to help? have you heard from them? >> yes. i just had the plumber come in to do -- look around. he says that everything that i did with the boiler to get it up and running as fast as i could was perfect. he would okay it. once we had power and gas restored. my meter, i only had -- my meter wasn't under water.

my panel was four breakers on the panel were submerged. i already replaced the breakers on the panel but he was telling me that bloomberg may have shot down the program because they're afraid of restoring the power and being responsible for people's houses burning down. >> have you got word from fema? have you talked to fema? >> fema came by, did their measurements, you know. they came and went. this is really ridiculous, you know. i'm going to stick it out, you know. i have no choice. i have nowhere to go. and this is all i got over here. i'm probably not the only one that's bearing the storm and bearing this tremendous inconvenience by the city. i mean, this is new york city. we should be, you know, prepared

for stuff like this. we shouldn't have to be waiting out in the cold for power or gas to be restored after so many days went by. i know this was a tremendous devastation, but you know, this is 2012. you know, this is -- this is, you know, modern technology. it doesn't take a rocket scientist to know that we need power, we need gas down here right away. that's it. >> diane, as a mom, what's it like to see your kids going through this? >> this is devastating. i mean, my youngest is 8 years old. i have to dress him in layers. we have to do homework with blankets, not just one blanket, two, three blankets on and he's freezing, and i have to like keep him on my lap and make him do homework with me. believe me, i've had offers for

people to take us in and get hot showers and i thank them from the bottom of my heart, but i can't leave my home. i can't leave -- i'm afraid to leave my home. i don't want what i have left to be taken from me and for my kids to be even more devastated than what they are, and to watch my kids shiver and say oh, mom, when are we even going to have like heat in this house, it's so cold, why are the windows open, and to try to explain to an 8-year-old, no, vin, the windows aren't open, it's hard. it's hard. it breaks my heart. i try to make the best of it. it's just hard. it's very difficult. >> nick and diane, we're going to continue to follow you and folks throughout this entire region. our thoughts and prayers are with you and we'll see how quickly power can get restored for you. thank you so much for being with us. >> thank you. >> retired congresswoman gabby

giffords face-to-face today in court with the man who shot here ahead on "360." >> announcer: you never know when, but thieves can steal your identity and turn your life upside down. >> hi. >> hi. you know, i can save you 15% today if you open up a charge card account with us. >> you just read my mind. >> announcer: just one little piece of information and they can open bogus accounts, stealing your credit, your money and ruining your reputation. that's why you need lifelock to relentlessly protect what matters most... [beeping...] helping stop crooks before your identity is attacked.

and now you can have the most comprehensive identity theft protection available today... lifelock ultimate. so for protection you just can't get anywhere else, get lifelock ultimate. >> i didn't know how serious identity theft was until i lost my credit and eventually i lost my home. >> announcer: credit monitoring is not enough, because it tells you after the fact, sometimes as much as 30 days later. with lifelock, as soon as our network spots a threat to your identity, you'll get a proactive risk alert, protecting you before you become a victim. >> identity theft was a huge, huge problem for me and it's gone away because of lifelock. >> announcer: while no one can stop all identity theft, if criminals do steal your information, lifelock will help fix it, with our $1 million service guarantee. don't wait until you become the next victim. you have so much to protect and nothing to lose when you call lifelock now to get two full months of identity theft protection risk free. that's right, 60 days risk-free.

use promo code: gethelp. if you're not completely satisfied, notify lifelock and you won't pay a cent. order now and also get this shredder to keep your documents out of the wrong hands-- a $29 dollar value, free. get protected now. call the number on your screen or go to lifelock.com to try lifelock protection risk free for a full 60 days. use promo code: gethelp. plus get this document shredder free-- but only if you act right now. call the number on your screen now!

i'm isha sesay with the 360 news and business bulletin. a judge sentenced jared loughner to life in prison today without the possibility of parole. some of his victims addressed him in court. loughner has schizophrenia, pleaded guilty to the 2011 mass shooting that killed six people and injured 13, including former congresswoman gabby giffords. she was in the courtroom today. syrian president bashar al assad vowed to live or die in his homeland and also issued a stark warning. he said foreign intervention in syria's bloody conflict would have a domino effect that would come at an unbearable cost. u.s. officials said two iranian fighter jets fired on an unarmed predator drone there the persian gulf days before the presidential election. the drone east of kuwait wasn't hit. the postal service is predicting the busiest holiday season ever. it expects to handle 365 million packages. a 20% spike over last year.

and emotional moment for president obama yesterday in chicago. he stopped by his campaign headquarters, he thanked workers for their hard work and shed some tears. a new mother in kenya has named her twin boys barack obama and mitt romney. they were born yesterday. no word on which baby won the race to be first-born. anderson? >> americans vote on election day. now they're expecting their leaders and representatives to get to work. we saw throughout the campaign, fixing the economy, solving the debt crisis were the top issues for voters. americans are tired of waiting. they want action as tom foreman found out in tonight's building up america report. >> just an hour outside of d.c., people in this small town of

washington, virginia, spent months waiting to see what the election would bring their way. and many like cabinetmaker peter cramer say they didn't much care about whether the democrats or republicans would win, just as long as the creeping economy starts racing again. >> yes, somebody fix it. let's get some people in washington who want to sit down and say let's solve the problem and stop the gridlock. >> next door at the stonyman gourmet farmer's cafe, susan james spent the run-up to the election feeling much the same way. >> certainly the economy has changed the way we conduct business. and it's changed decisions we've made. major decisions. >> instead of expanding her family-owned business, she kept a close eye on costs, steered clear of debt, and watched the electoral process play out. what is it that you most want to see from washington, d.c.? >> leadership, and stepping up.

the game of passing the buck, blaming the other guy, sounds like the way my brother and i used to fight when we were 7 years old. and people know it. we don't want that. >> it was that way all over town before the election. many, like jewelrymaker caitlin mullen were unsure of what would happen with taxes, jobs -- >> i think a lot of people are just scared to commit a large amount of money to anything, whether it be a couple hundred dollars for custom jewelry, or homes, you know. people are nervous. >> no one expects any quick fix for the economy. >> it's big and it's going to take some time. and a lot of work, and it would be nice to get at it. >> but they are more than ready to start building up again, just as soon as the other washington settles down, gets back to work. tom foreman, cnn, washington, virginia. >> the ridiculous is up next. confusion over m.i.t. sweat

shirts at polling places nearly cause two people their right to vote. ñç@rño when back pain slows you down,

trust icy hot for powerful relief. [ male announcer ] the icy hot patch. goes on icy to dull pain, hot to relax it away. so you're back to full speed. [ male announcer ] icy hot. power past pain.

time for the "ridiculist." tonight, we are adding confusing sweatshirts. that's right, damn you confusing sweatshirts. here's what happened. there was an election the other day, perhaps you heard about it. now this election involved many things, candidates, ballots, wolf blitzer hollering stand by, we have a projection every five minutes or so. the election also involved

people known as voters. now, i'm no john king, but from what i understand, voters when voting typically wear what those of us in the mainstream media refer to as clothes. and therein lies the problem. at least in two locations in colorado and florida, you see election officials were reportedly alarmed to see voters showing up in clothing emblazoned with the name mitt, a violation of election laws that prohibit campaigning for a candidate within a certain number of feet from voting booths. the problem? the shirts did not say mitt. they said m.i.t. as in massachusetts institute of technology. one of the top colleges in the country, by the way. mr. romney's name in case it wasn't clear, is spelled with two ts. now, i'm seriously not making this up. but look, i give election workers a lot of credit. they're helping our democracy. it's thankless work. what's more, you really can't blame them for thinking the romney campaign might have misspelled their candidate's name. remember this, the romney campaign's iphone app that allowed you to take a photo with the words "a better america"

super imposed over it except they misspelled the word america as amercia. look, i don't want to be a stickler about this but you know, i'm just really particular about spelling. frankly, i think anyone who isn't a good speller should be embarrassed. >> m-a-l- -- m-a-l-i-a-b-l-e. wait a minute. what did i say? hold on! m-a-l-i-a-b-l-e. [ buzzer ] >> sorry. >> i hate this game! >> yeah. i lost the spelling bee to a 12-year-old. so what? so what? but m.i.t., come on. it's not exactly an unknown school. it has some brilliant students and pretty smart staffers. >> you dropped 150 grand on a [ bleep ] education you could have gotten for $1.50 and late charges at the public library. >> you mess with m.i.t. you get good will hunting up in your grill. for the voters who were sing