specializing in fish and game from the great northwest. he'll start investing early, he'll find some good people to help guide him, and he'll set money aside from his first day of work to his last, which isn't rocket science. it's just common sense. from td ameritrade.

good evening this is the piers morgan special guns in america. president obama is creation of the second amendment. press secretary jay carney says the president's proposals will be significant. >> the president has made clear that he intends to take a comprehensive approach, including the assault weapons ban, including a measure to ban high-capacity magazine clips, including an effort to close the very big loopholes in the background check system in our country. >> is the white house plan enough? tonight i'll talk to experts on both sides of the gun battle plus victims' families and big city mayors leading the charge for gun control. and consider this. since adam lanza murdered 20 children and six adults at sandy hook at least 917 americans have been killed by guns. while the nra reports an unprecedented surge in membership, up 250,000 over the past month. add to that record sales of ar-15 assault rifles. so what's the solution? more weapons or stricter laws?

let's talk about all of that tonight with our studio audience. it's our version of the town hall. it's the most important issue facing america right now. here is what the president is going to propose tomorrow. he will press for a ban on high capacity magazines with more than ten rounds. he will push for universal background checks and increase criminal and mental health checks. he'll press for an assault weapons ban. and the president will request that money be made available to treat mental illness and provide schools at all levels support to enhance safety. if you've been watching our show for the last knew weeks, indeed months you'll know i agree with most of that and have campaigned on it. all this comes on a day with two new school shootings, one in kentucky that left two dead and one in missouri that left two men injured. if you want to be part of the conversation, join us on twitter. @piersmorgan. use our hashtag which is #gunsinamerica. let's get started. joining us is philadelphia mayor michael nutter and his police commissioner charles ramsey. delaware attorney general beau biden, son of vice president joe biden.

and daniel webster. he's the director of the johns hopkins center for gun policy and research. welcome to you. >> thank you. >> let me start with you, if i may, mr. mayor. you're a mayor of a major american city. a violent city. like many of the big cities in america. from what you understand of what the president will be revealing tomorrow as wa he wants to push forward with, is that enough? >> it is a fantastic start, piers. and the problem is we haven't done enough in the past. first and foremost, president obama and certainly the work of vice president biden needs to be commended. this will not be easy. we all know that. and so for all those, if there are going to be those voices already saying is it enough, how about joining the fight to make sure that we're successful? and then we'll keep pushing forward. >> police commissioner ramsey, there are two issues here, it seems to me, in terms of the type of violence. you have the predominantly handgun violence of criminals and gangs. and then you have the mass shootings, which have escalated in recent years. i think half of the 12 worst

mass shootings in american history have come since 2007. most of them now happen with the ar-15 style assault rifle. it seems to me they're almost two different issues to deal with, certainly from a policing point of view. >> well, semi-automatic handguns pose the biggest threat to us in cities. last year in philadelphia we had 331 homicides. 85% were committed with a firearm. and a vast majority semi-automatic handguns, the 9-millimeter being the most important. i think all these laws have to fit together. it's not an either-or proposition. banning assault weapons in and of itself is not going to solve the problem. you have to do it in combination with a variety of things. so i'm pleased that the administration is moving forward. i agree with the mayor. it's a start but it's not the finish. >> right. let's turn to beau biden. i mean, the reality, beau, isn't it, that this will not solve the gun crime problem in america. it's not going to stop mass

shootings. what it is, it seems to me, is an eminently sensible reaction to the horrors of what happened in sandy hook and indeed in aurora and the other seven mass shootings in 2012. >> well, i think we are going to see tomorrow a common sense approach to dealing with the issues you've laid out, both mass shootings, tragedies like what happened in connecticut, but also what's happening on the streets of my city and the city that i love and used to work in in philadelphia, whether it be the market street in philadelphia or market street in wilmington, delaware. you see a proliferation of weapons being used. you see younger and younger people using them, being used on them and against them. this is going to be a comprehensive approach to deal with all of these issues. three kind of legs that this stool is going to be built on. one is dealing with gun violence. two is dealing with school safety. and three, i think, is dealing with the mental health category, making sure you have a rational approach to making sure that

people who have mental illnesses, not just those who have been adjudicated as such, have less access to weapons. i hope that's what we'll be hearing about tomorrow. i hope that's what we'll be talking about in my state. >> certainly you've seen both in your state and now new york with governor cuomo bringing stringent laws to a state that already had pretty tough laws. and it seems to me they are, as the commissioner said, they're attacking now all aspects of this. because there are many threads to how you deal with gun violence in america. i have a particular interest in the assault weapon ban because i just simply can't understand why these military-style weapons are even in civilian hands. but you have to add in mental health, the potential impact of video, violent games on deranged people. hollywood movies even. but certainly the handgun situation as well. your father obviously has put in a lot of time in this, as he did before. one of the big reality checks tomorrow is going to be whatever

the president says on your father's recommendations, can it get through congress? can it actually become law? >> well, that remains to be seen. congress has an obligation to act. you know, i'm not going to preview what the president is going to say and what my father has recommended to him. i'm going to attend tomorrow. i look forward to hearing what they are offering. i know it's complens comprehensive. i know my father has put in a lot of thought sxefrt, meeting with the nra and victims and survivors in connecticut to other sportsmen as well as people that have been on the fight to have a sensible gun policy in america. but, look, on the assault weapons piece of this, look, i served in the military. i was assigned an m-16 for the majority of my career. these are weapons designed for battlefields, not our cities and communities. so that's a part of it. but a big part of it, piers, and something you've talked about very eloquently-s right now under the 1968 gun control act one of the categories of people

who are prohibited are people that have been adjudicated mentally ill. i have a view and we're going to talk to leaders here in the state is whether or not that's too narrow a group. whether or not how do we deal with the person who's been adjudicated -- rather diagnosed as a paranoid schizophrenic? should they be able to walk out of their diagnosis from their psychiatrist and go to the walmart and buy a weapon? under the current law they can because unless they've been adjudicated mentally ill they can. these are going to be difficult issues. they're going to involve privacy folks who are very great defenders of privacy, aligned with defenders of the second amendment. these are difficult issues we need to work through. i'm confident that the administration's package is going to attack those things as we are here in the state of delaware. >> turning now to dr. webster. you spent the last two days at more than 20 of the world's leading gun policy experts formulating research, policies to reduce gun violence in the united states. tell me this. how does the united states compare to other countries? take the most industrialized countries in the world. is it as shocking as many would

have us believe? >> yes, it is. if you compare united states homicide rates with other high-income countries in terms of their average homicide rates, ours is approximately six times higher than other countries of similar wealth. if you look at our firearm homicide rates, our rates are 22 times higher than other countries. >> dr. fox, you're an expert of school and mass shootings. and i suppose the obvious question for people like me that reacted with such horror to sandy hook and demand these assault weapons be removed from circulation is this -- would it actually make any difference? are they choosing these weapons because they're easy to get hold of? will they just go and find some other weapon that can do the same job for them? >> well, incidents like sandy hook certainly motivate us to do some reasonable, sensible things that we must do about gun

violence. but they will have the least likelihood of impacting mass murder. mass murder is a very deliberate, very determined to reach their mission. and they will do whatever they need to do to get a weapon, no matter what we put in their way. all these strategies the white house is talking about are good ideas, but the fact of the matter is that there's unfortunately far too many weapons already in circulation, which a mass murderer can acquire. and even if he can't get a gun, by the way, the largest mass murder in america was with bombing, oklahoma city. the second largest, with fire, in the bronx. so these are all good ideas. but if you expect that this will prevent the next sandy hook from occurring -- and i hear people saying that -- you'll be bitterly disappointed. >> mr. mayor, let me ask you. you're a mayor of a huge city, like i said, with a lot of these problems you have to deal with directly on a daily basis. clearly there's no easy fix here

to this. underpinning it all is you have a culture of guns and gun violence in this country, which is unlike almost anywhere else in the world. how do you deal with that issue? how do you deal with the americans who say, no, you're not having any of my guns? it's my second amendment right to bear arms. i can have all this. >> well, first of all, no one is talking about taking anyone's weapon. but even the u.s. supreme court has made clear in the chicago ruling and the washington, d.c. ruling that you can place reasonable restrictions on guns. many, many states have a variety of -- almost a menu of restrictions in terms of type of weapon, type of ammunition, et cetera, et cetera. i commend governor cuomo and the assembly in the senate in new york. they're respecting the second amendment. but they're trying to make their state that much safer. so, i mean, this is not about the second amendment. as you have said earlier, i have said certainly many, many times,

why does a civilian need a military-style assault weapon? why does a civilian need body armor? you cannot buy hand grenades. those are weapons. but somehow those are prohibited. you cannot buy an f-15 just because you think you would like to have that kind of device. we need to talk about more serious things. >> you have, actually, a lot of gun control in america. this is the myth of this debate. there's already substantial gun control. commissioner, let me ask you this. i mean, lots of things are banned already. it's merely a question, really, of degree. i have yet to hear a good argument for why an ar-15, which is a military-style weapon, why that should be in civilian hands. no one can say anything other than they're fun to use. well, that's not good enough anymore, is it? >> well, listen, i agree with you. i think there's no legitimate reason for a civilian to have those kinds of weapons. but the kinds of laws i would like to see across the board, and i think it has to be done at a federal level because

pennsylvania is a good example of very weak gun laws, just the opposite of new york. but registering firearms. if you want to sell the firearm, it should be done through a federal firearms licensed dealer where there's a background check done, there's some transfer of title just like if you sold your automobile you can't just give your car away and not transfer the title. >> what gets me, they always throw back to me on twitter or whatever it may be, what about cars? they kill more people than guns. of course cars have another purpose. they transport people. guns have just the one purpose. and in relation to driving a car you have to go through all sorts of regulations. >> you have to be licensed. >> americans go along with that. this kind of invasion of your rights, i don't get. a gun is more dangerous than a car. >> they're not particularly serious arguments and they're not people who want to be serious about public safety. they don't get the phone calls. they don't get the e-mails and text messages about another body in the streets. and so this is what we deal with on a daily basis.

and we mourn, certainly, the tragic loss in newtown or aurora or tucson. but in cities all across america almost on a daily basis, someone is shot and people are killed and we do have a culture of violence issue in the united states of america that we must address. >> 35 americans are killed with guns every day. >> right. >> more than double that take their own lives every day. >> yes. >> then you can add another whole lot that get hit by gunfire thanks to developments in modern surgery they survive. >> we're very fortunate. we've got excellent trauma centers. or the numbers would be a lot higher than they are now. but, i mean, dr. fox mentioned that, you know, it's not an absolute that it will stop mass shootings. i understand that. i think everybody understands that. but we need to put in place as much as we possibly can to try to minimize the opportunity for people who should not have guns to get their hands on them and use them. >> dr. fox, you want to jump in here? >> yeah. let me add one thing.

the mayors against guns brought this up just yesterday in their report. we also have to deal with how guns get into the illegal gun market. this is not necessarily just gun show issue or background checks. but we need to repeal the hart amendment. that's the amendment that prevents people like me and other researchers to identify the rogue dealers who just aren't doing what they should be doing in terms of keeping the best records and making sure that the wrong people don't buy guns. we know, for example, that less than 1% of gun dealers in this country are responsible for about half of the guns that are used in violent crimes. we need to identify those dealers and perhaps make sure that they upgrade their business practice. you also have to do something about the teaharden amendment. >> chicago gets blamed for the horrific gun violence they have. but half the illegal guns they find in chicago come from indiana, where they have much more lax control. let's keep everybody here. let's take a break. when we come back next, gun rights advocates will join me on my panel to defend the nra.

and why they say more gun control is wrong for america. see life in the best light. outdoors, or in. transitions® lenses automatically filter just the right amount of light. so you see everything the way it's meant to be seen. maybe even a little better. visit your eyecare professional today to ask about our newest lenses, transitions vantage and transitions xtractive lenses. experience life well lit. ask which transitions adaptive lens is best for you. and these come together, one thing you can depend on is that these will come together. delicious and wholesome. some combinations were just meant to be. tomato soup from campbell's. it's amazing what soup can do.

humans. even when we cross our t's and dot our i's, we still run into problems. namely, other humans. which is why at liberty mutual insurance, auto policies come with new car replacement and accident forgiveness if you qualify. see what else comes standard at libertymutual.com. liberty mutual insurance. responsibility. what's your policy?

welcome back to my special "guns in america," police commissioner charles ramsey, mayor michael nutter. james fox. charlie webster. scottie hughes, director of the tea party news network. her brother was shot and killed when they were children. also nicholas johnson, professor of law at fordham university school of law and co-author of "firearms and the sebld amendment." and lou palumbo director of the elite intelligent protection security firm, also a former police officer. welcome to you all. scottie, let me start with you. obviously an awful tragedy in your early life involving firearms. despite that you have quite strong views that there should be no more gun control as such. why is that? >> because evil is going to happen. that is the thing. they will find a way. if someone wants to do somebody harm, they're going to do it regardless of whether they use a gun, knife or any sort of tool. all this is doing is punishing the legal, good citizens of the united states and taking away rights that were given to us by our founding fathers. >> do you think the founding fathers ever had in mind when

they framed the second amendment at a time when muskets were the preferred weapon of choice and took maybe 15 seconds to reload an ar-15 style bushmaster rifle that could unload perhaps 100 bullets in a minute? >> at that same thinking you could look at the first amendment and say could the founding fathers imagine something like the internet or maybe cable news networks? and if we're going to sit there and start applying to the second amendment to different weapons, where do we stop? where do we draw the line? >> the first amendment refers to freedom of expression, and speed for the press. that doesn't change depending on the medium. but the apparent ability of an ar-15 compared to a musket to cause mass carnage and mass murder is significantly different. >> piers, the other thing to think about here, though, is the variation between the power of the individual and the power of the state. at the time that you're talking about in 1787, the government had muskets and individuals had muskets, there was a very close correlation between the power to use violence on both sides.

the other thing that you have to take into account, this is something i haven't heard in this debate, and that is if you look basically to the middle of the 19th century, 1862, the winchester henry rifle, report on that rifle that i just cited in a recent paper showed that it fired 15 rounds in less than ten seconds. the fact of the matter is that repeating technology is 150 years old. and one of the worries here, i think, for people who are on the other side of this is that when we go through this bad gun analysis that there's not really a solid boundary between the current category of assault weapons, parcularly rifles, and any other gun that is out there. >> why ban machine guns then? >> machine guns were banned in 1934 as a result of the national firearms act. >> why not ban the ar-15? >> i think you can make a coherent distinks between semi-automatic firing and automatic -- >> explain to me the distinction between an m-16, military machine gun and an ar-15 semiautomatic that may have been modified, for example. >> well, you added modified.

but the fundamental distinction is that the machine gun will fire -- first of all, it's crew served. it will fire from a belt. the machine guns that are mainly targeted under the national firearms act are guns that you could categorize as requiring multiple individuals to operate. so the idea -- no, so the idea that -- >> right. but if an ar-15 can fire 100 bullets in a minute and somebody like the shooter in aurora, holmes, used a magazine with 100 bullets and an ar-15, they are effectively machine guns, aren't they? >> no, they are not effectively machine guns. >> i know they're 99 terms of a technological description. but in terms of their firepower they behave like a machine gun. >> no, they don't. in terms of fire power they're really not that distinct from lots of other repeating technology. so one of the things that you have to do if you're serious about this, and i think -- and i'm not here to defend anyone or any particular group. but if you're serious about this, you have to acknowledge that there is a thin distinction between the repeating capacity of the ar-15 and a whole list of

things that appeared on the good guns list in 1994. one of the problems with what happened here is that we're going to make things worse. we're going to make things worse. >> the whole good and bad gun thing to me -- >> here is how it happened in 1994. it happened in 1994 that we focused on handgun control, no longer interested in handgun bans. josh sugarman wrote a memo that said let's focus on this other thing. people mistake them for machine guns. and what happened was we took guns that had -- that were in the inventory at about a rate of a couple hundred thousand, $300,000 or $400,000 of these guns and this law juiced the demand. now we've got millions of -- probably have ten million ar-15s in the inventory. and that is a consequence partly of the -- >> part of what the president said earlier in the week. the problem is the nra and the gun lobby now have such a powerful voice and they play off this fear factor that exactly that happens, the volume of guns sold, the amount of ammunition

sold rockets every time there's any conversation about gun control or in the immediate aftermath of any massacre. i mean, i've read a staggering statistic today. did you know that more americans bought guns in the last two months, december and november, than would fit the entire chinese and indian armies? i mean, beau biden, when you hear that, what does that tell you as a reaction to aurora and then sandy hook? >> well, piers, look, the reality is that gun sales skyrocketed upon the election of barack obama and vice president joe biden in 2009. they skyrocketed again in the recent election well before the tragedies in connecticut. there's a lot of misinformation out there on the part of gun owners. i'm a gun owner. i have a shotgun. i'm in the military. i have an m-16 that as i said was assigned to me for most of my career. as the mayor said, who i have great respect for, and the chief from the city just 25 piles from my hometown, the second

amendment and the supreme court has spoken. the united states constitution has guaranteed a right to bear and keep arms. but that doesn't mean it's an absolute right just as you referenced at the first amendment. you cannot yell fire in a crowded theater. justice scalia has spoken eloquently in his opinion that the fact is that you can regulate the types of firearms that are actually -- can be regulated. there has to be common sense approach to this. they are very difficult issues. we propose an assault weapons ban. but what we're focused on also in my state is a universal background check, something that those on the far -- >> sorry. if i may, beau, i want to bring in lou palumbo because you've got lots of experience with firearms, you know them better than anyone in this room. when you hear people say there's no comparison between the m-16 military weapon and ar-15, what is your reaction? >> well, i understand what his position is, and it's a little bit of semantics. the fact of the matter is that these semi-automatic ar-15s

cycle at such an extreme rate that they're capable of inflicting an immense amount of damage in a very short window of time. the issue here also with the nra, we should be behind this. we apparently need to address the vetting process that isn't in place for civilians, that is in place for us in law enforcement. in other words, as a condition, i had to comply with psychological screening to get a handgun so i could work with it. the general public walks in with a driver's license and in two days they walk out with a handgun. it's not sufficient any longer for us to know the only thing about you is the fact that you haven't been convicted of a felony. and that's just the reality check. and it's part of the evolution of our culture. we need to know more -- >> when you hear this, what no one has told me yet is why anybody would need an ar-15. what do you actually need one for? >> our bill of rights isn't a bill of needs, it says bill of rights. >> piers -- >> it is our right. hundreds of thousands of men and women have died so we could have that right to own it. >> you're not answering my

question. why do you need one? >> to protect myself and protect my family. let's look through history. right now we might like our government. but you've got cambodia, you've got russia, you've got germany. >> right. so just to clarify you believe that an american government in the modern age is going to turn tyrannical? >> no, i'm not saying that. but i have the right to be able to own a gun just in case -- >> i want to clarify what you're saying to me. you that would need an ar-15 to protect yourself against your own government? >> well, let's look at it right now. tomorrow we have 19 executive orders coming down. i wouldn't say that's a tyrannical government but it kind of sounds like thar mandates. the last six years we have had natural disasters where police have cleared out of those cities and the people that had the weapons were safe. we don't know what's happening. today we might have a bright sunny america but who's to say what's doeg to happen in the future? >> how about this one? you're a young gay couple or you're a young interracial couple, you're in a rural area and the next morning there's a klan march downtown and the next

night you go home and you wonder what the night holds and what the next several weeks hold. i would venture that you could talk with a variety of people in that context and they would say, i think i would like a gun. >> okay. >> and those people might actually -- >> but -- >> or you might want to call the police. >> yeah. >> here's the deal. here is the thing about police. look what all these crimes have in common. we're sitting here talking about all these vicious crimes. the one thing they have in common, the police came after the crime happened. the rapes, murders, suicides, the police weren't there when they happened. >> can i respond to the mayor? because this is core. this is central. there is a window of eminent threat in which the -- >> hold your comments to the mayor until after we come back from the break. i think the point i would make to that is exactly what he said. you can call the police. by the way, i have no problem, nor does he, with americans having a gun at home to protect their family. that's not this issue. when we come back, we'll debate more of this and the president's plan for universal background checks. excuse me, maestro? bring it down, please?

(orchestra plays softer) better. that's what happens to background noise, when you're making a call on this. this microphone here, picks up the sounds around you and helps turn them down. (orchestra plays louder) so when the world gets noisy -- calls sound better.

isurprise...it's eating less. to losing weight. i'm hungry just thinking about it. thank goodness for new slimful. one delicious, 90-calorie slimful and a glass of water, like before dinner, helps keep me satisfied for hours. so instead of this much, i only need this much. and slimful tastso good... i don't even miss dessert. slimful and a glass of water... eating less is a beautiful thing.

back now on my special "guns in america." we left it on a point you raised there about calling the police. you have an issue with that. >> i wanted to emphasize this because it sharpens the point of our disagreement. people who own guns have kids, they have families. they love them. they've got a different view about how to maintain their individual security. and what we're talking about in response to your comment, call the police, is that there is a window of imminent threat that's recognized by our law of self-defense that says the government's monopoly on violence is something that we create an exception to. >> here is my response. i don't think anybody in this room, or very, very few people -- >> legitimate violence. >> government's monopoly on violence? >> sure. the government -- >> we're not in the violence business. >> no, the government has a monopoly on legitimate violence. the government can execute people. the government can execute people. and when you go into a civilized

society the idea is that only the government can use violence -- >> let me interrupt here. i think we're drifting slightly off the point. because here's my response. i think most people in this room have no issue with americans having a gun at home to defend themselves. i come back, scottie, to what i said earlier. what is the purpose, what is the need of an ar-15 which can have a magazine of 100 bullets? nobody can give me any reason why a civilian needs that. your explanation appears to be you fear a tyrannical government attacking you. >> because i have the right. that's my first explanation. i have the right. hundreds of thousands of men and women for the last 250 years have died for me to have that right. >> to have an ar-15? >> to have any gun. >> why do you need an ar-15? >> because i do want to protect my family and god forbid something happens in this country -- piers, we have $16 trillion in debt. our economy is teetering. what would happen if our economy collapsed? who is to say what would happen? look at l.a. riots. look at everything that happened like you said -- things happen in this world.

>> reality check. we're not -- >> this is reality check. >> we're not back in the 18th century. right? george iii is dead. and let me explain one other thing to you. if your government does turn tyrannical they have 5,000 nuclear warheads at their disposal to come after you and your guns. so let's wake up and smell the coffee. >> you know, if they want to drop a nuclear bomb in tennessee -- >> let me bring in james fox. james fox, you want to jump in. >> that's just ludicrous. >> we seem to be focusing too much just on ar-15s and assault weapons. actually, a small percentage of homicides are committed with assault weapons. >> wait, wait, wait. let me respond to that. because the reason that i've been focused on that, in particular, i'm aware it's a small percentage of the killings in america. but the last four mass shootings in america, aurora, the oregon shopping mall, the terrible case of the firemen lured to their deaths just before christmas, and then sandy hook, all of those have involved an ar-15. it's become the preferred weapon for mass shootings. >> no.

>> and the reason is they are killing machines. >> mass shootings are not with assault weapons, actually. >> i said the last four. >> they're with semi-automatic weapons but not assault weapons. and during the assault -- >> what is an assault weapon? >> look at the ban. >> columbine had them when the ban was going on. >> with the greatest of respect to everybody here, especially you, mr. fox, with the greatest respect, if a madman can go up to sandy hook elementary school and in the space of a few minutes kill 20 kids and six others, hit by between 3 and 11 bullets each, i'm sorry, that is an assault weapon. what else do you call it? >> you and i agree. the only thing -- i think that's a broader problem, a prodder issue. we can't just focus on the ar-15. >> nor can you dismiss it. >> that's all i'm saying. >> you said it yourself, a mad man. that's the issue right now. we don't need to be dealing with the guns. we need to be dealing -- >> that's part of the issue. >> no. madman. he was going to do harm no matter what. regardless of what gun -- >> why don't you make it as hard as possible for him to get his hands on it? where did he get the guns from? his mother.

>> irresponsible parenting. >> that's not good enough. i'm sorry. daniel webster, let me bring you in here. irresponsible parenting, to me, is not a way to try and tackle this problem. you can't say you have to be better parents to try to stop an adam lanza. >> right. and i just want to respond to some of the comments earlier that i think are really off the mark. the idea that if they don't have a gun they'll use something else. that's why we have a homicide rate in the united states at six times higher than other high-income countries. it's not because -- we actually -- our violent crime rates are not all that different. we don't have any real differences with mental health in terms of having more mentally ill people. we don't have kids who are more troubled or bullied or depressed. we have more guns. and that's why we have more homicides. >> actually, sir, we have number one in the u.s. -- yes, we have more guns. 88 guns per 100 people. there's no doubt about that. but we are ranked at number 28

in the world on actual homicides behind honduras, jamaica, and el salvador. it is because we allow the good people to be able to defend themselves. that's the real reason. >> your answer has nothing to do with -- >> i'll let the mayor respond. this argument, mr. mayor, about the good people -- >> that's ludicrous. >> -- apparently protecting america's position, the reality -- and this is a reality check again. take britain, take australia. both had massacres. i've got a lady mehere from dunblane in scotland, 16 school children killed 5 years old. a terrible tragedy. national handgun ban, national assault weapon ban. ever since then the national average of murders has been between 30 and 60 ever since. here's the point -- >> your violent crime rate is through the roof. you're number one. >> scottie, let me finish. i'm not disputing that britain doesn't have numerous problems with knife crime and robberies and burglaries and all those things. but the thing we got right was gun crime. >> people now use knives. >> australia --

>> they can use pipes. find other ways. >> australia found two things. when they brought in their bans, they found that the murder rate came down but also significantly so did the suicide rate. 18,000 americans kill themselves with guns every year. the question is, how many would if they didn't have guns in their homes? >> they would find something else. >> i don't think they would. >> piers, on the suicide data you actually -- that is the stronger -- if you look at the data, the suicide data is the stronger argument here because there is an indication that if you look at what happens with firearm suicides, that when young people attempt suicide if they attempt it with a gun their success rate is higher. oftentimes you interview them afterwards, they don't have the gun, they survive and basically change their minds. >> i'm keen to try and keep the debate on an even keel. it's a passionate debate. everybody gets emotional. and i respect both sides, and i totally respect the second amendment people who say you are breaching my rights. i get that's an argument many, many americans feel.

how do you convince them this is not an attack on their rights, if you like? >> it is not an attack on their rights. but citizens in our city and many cities across america are being attacked by criminals who have weapons, who shouldn't have them. there are a lot of weapons in cities all across the united states of america. so this is about reasonable, common sense steps that can be taken to make sure that inappropriate folks don't have weapons in the first place and that our streets are safe. so much of this discussion, quite honestly, and with every respect, and i'm sorry for your loss, has nothing to do with what goes on in most cities across the united states of america, trying to make sure people are safe. >> explain to me how the cities with the strongest -- >> if i could -- >> explain to me how cities with the strongest ban, the strongest rules are the ones with the highest crime rate. chicago. california as a state. your own city right now has an issue with crime. >> scotie, wake up a moment. >> i am awake.

>> chicago has strong gun control, but the states around it have weak gun control. >> and the criminals are still getting them -- >> until you have a federal -- until you have a federal consistency, nothing will change. >> piers, supreme court -- >> acknowledge that when you look at the gun ownership rate in places where the rate is high versus places where the rate is low -- >> let's take a break. >> -- high gun ownership rate is corresponding with lower gun crime. >> what is indisputable is that america has 11,000 to 12,000 gun murders a year. australia has mid 40s, britain has 35, japan has about 10. next a debate from those hit hardest, the family members of the victims of gun violence join our discussion. [ indistinct shouting ]

♪ [ indistinct shouting ] [ male announcer ] time and sales data. split-second stats. [ indistinct shouting ] ♪ it's so close to the options floor... [ indistinct shouting, bell dinging ] ...you'll bust your brain box. ♪ all on thinkorswim from td ameritrade. ♪ from td ameritrade. so, i'm working on a cistern intake valve, and the guy hands me a locknut wrench. no way! i'm like, what is this, a drainpipe slipknot? wherever your business takes you, nobody keeps you on the road like progressive commercial auto. [ flo speaking japanese ] [ shouting in japanese ] we work wherever you work. now, that's progressive. call or click today.

back with my special "guns in america."

joining me now in the audience, their cousin ashley moser was wounded in the aurora theater shooting and her daughter, veronica, lost her life that day. welcome to you both. i notice both of you have been getting emotional in this debate. it must be very difficult for you. you have an ongoing tragedy and you also lost this beautiful little girl. heather, tell me how you feel about the way you've heard people talk about this issue. >> well, i'm with you, piers. i'm concerned that these laws that the vice president and task force have worked so hard on won't pass because what i'm hearing is one side being so adamant on saying that they're right instead of doing the right thing. and we lost family members, and we know that it has to take small steps to get somewhere. and i just wanted to say that i don't think people understand that i don't hear anyone saying

that anyone wants to take the guns away or not let you have the right to bear arms. i just keep hearing people saying i'm right, i'm right and then they don't want to listen to the other side, and then i'm afraid nothing is going to be done. but you can't do nothing. i mean, how are you going to tell my children that nothing has been done after what happened to our family? >> but you know, piers, the truth of the matter is this. these assault rifle bans are not going to change this dynamic in america. wait, wait, wait. let me finish what i'm saying. a heart to heart about how we handle mental illness, the enforcement issue, the vetting of people that get these firearms and an overall education for americans who possess them is going to change this country. >> okay. but let me -- i think that's all very valid. i do. and i think these are all very relevant points. but when you have a family like this who have been destroyed by what has happened. you saw, ashley -- kendra, when you hear people try to insist on saying that these ar-15 weapons

are not assault weapons, what do you say to that? >> it's really impossible for me to understand that the killers could get that kind of power in their hands. it doesn't make any sense at all to me. and i don't blame honorable gun owners. i don't want to take away your second amendment rights. but i need to know that you'll stand up for me, too. i mean, you should be carrying that second amendment right with honor and being proud that that's not accessible to everybody. >> scottie, let me ask you. the man that ruined the lives of this family, he's just been in court recently. he got 6,000 rounds of ammunition on the internet anonymously. he armed himself with four weapons. and then james holmes dressed up as the joker and walked into a movie theater, planned the whole thing, and hit 70 americans, killing 12, killing their little niece, paralyzing their sister. and for them to have to hear you say these aren't assault weapons and we shouldn't take them away from civilians, it is hurtful to

them. they want to hear you say i'm a gun owner, i understand this is not about anyone taking my weapon from my home to defend myself, but these military weapons have got to go. >> but the let me say np.pain you've gone through, it's horrible. been there. you will never recover. your family will never recover for generations and i'm so sorry for that. but the question is, he obtained those guns illegally. those were not his legal guns. and we have to realize that. and if we look at all these shootings where they've happened, schools, malls, theaters, there's one thing they all have in common. they are gun-free zones. there was no one there with a gun to be able to stop them because -- >> i could argue that point. >> that's my question. tomorrow barack obama is going to -- and really, if this was so high on the president's agenda -- >> tell me something, scottie. i keep hearing this, gun-free zone. but since most mass shooters get killed during the mass shootings, they don't give a damn if they live or die. why do they care about going through a gun-free zone? they're going to kill dozens and dozens of innocent people.

>>rot killed. i've never heard -- i've never heard any of them leave a note saying it's because it was a gun-free zone. i've never seen anybody find any evidence that they thought it was a gun-free zone. >> if you're going to sit here and commit a crime and do that, i'm not going to go to a place where everybody has guns. that's why you don't hear it at gun shows -- >> these things don't happen at police stations. >> hold those thoughts. we're going to take a break. we'll be right back. i have a cold, and i took nyquil,

but i'm still stubbed up. [ male announcer ] truth is, nyquil doesn't unstuff your nose. what? [ male announcer ] alka-seltzer plus liquid gels speeds relief to your worst cold symptoms plus has a decongestant for your stuffy nose. thanks. that's the cold truth! well, dad, i spent my childhood living with monks learning the art of dealmaking. you've mastered monkey-style kung fu? no. priceline is different now. you don't even have to bid. master hahn taught you all that? oh, and he says to say (translated from cantonese) "you still owe him five bucks." your accent needs a little work. to help protect your eye health as you age... would you take it? well, there is.

[ male announcer ] it's called ocuvite. a vitamin totally dedicated to your eyes, from the eye care experts at bausch + lomb. as you age, eyes can lose vital nutrients. ocuvite helps replenish key eye nutrients. ocuvite has a unique formula not found in your multivitamin to help protect your eye health. now that's a pill worth taking. [ male announcer ] ocuvite. help protect your eye health. email marketing from constant contact reaches people in a place they're checking every day -- their inbox. and it gives you the tools to create custom emails that drive business. it's just one of the ways constant contact can help you grow your small business. sign up for your free trial today at constantcontact.com/try.

welcome back to my special "guns in america." joining me in the audience now is neil hesland whose son died at sandy hook elementary and

paul. if i could correct you, scottie, one thing is you said james holmes the aurora shooter purchased his guns illegally. in fact, he purchased them legally. that argument is shattered. secondly, of course, you said they operate in gun-free zones. columbine wasn't a gun-free zone. there was an armed security man there. virginia tech had a lot of security around. ft. hood was the most heavily armed secure place possibly in america when a madman went berserk and killed lots of people. >> but columbine -- >> i want to correct you on those two. >> wisconsin they also -- >> there's no evidence that any of them have ever thought gun-free zone. but let me turn to you, neil. i've interviewed you several times now. you're always extremely moving about this. you played me in the green ram last night after the show a little tape you have of your little boy singing happy birthday and it broke my heart. i can't imagine what it's like. i know you've been getting emotional here too. when you hear people talk in this way and just have no

apparent comprehension i think of why you want these kind of weapons taken away, what is your reaction? >> well, i agree with this lady about it is our constitutional right to have -- bear arms. that i can respect. but still don't understand why somebody would, especially after what happened with my child, jessie, want or need an assault-type rifle, an ar-15, for protection. a shotgun, a handgun would be more than sufficient. we have the strongest military in the world. and one person or a handful of people with assault rifles isn't going to protect our country. >> are you encouraged by what you think is coming tomorrow from the president? do you think he's got it about right? >> i hope to see a ban on

assault rifles or much stricter possession of them. as for the restrictions years ago, machine guns, where they have to be registered in federal registration, stronger background checks on it. >> and i think like everyone, neil, we've talked about this. all the other things come into play, the mental health, the obsession with these people -- >> there's many factors. i think mental health is a big issue. what to do with people that have mental health issues as to how to treat them, whether they should be institutionalized or what. >> let me bring in ti may the man next to you paul localino. his brother steven died at the empire state building shooting august 2012. there was another i incident at the empire state building recently where police opened fire on a man and killed him.

what is significant is two policemen, trained to fire guns, actually hit nine bystanders. and they are trained people at close proximity. what it said to me is this sort of casual idea of arming everybody to try and deal with this, even the professionals find it very, very hard. >> i want to direct this to scottie. could you imagine if at the empire state building 9:00 in the morning all those people if we were all armed -- if it was armed? it would have been like the wild west after my brother was shot there in front of the empire state building. it's time for this common sense approach that mr. biden was saying, what the brady campaign is talking about. we have to take steps, big steps like lou has been mentioning. this is -- we can't have what happened to his son happen to anybody anymore. it's outrageous that we accept 10,000 -- whatever it is, 10,000, 11,000, 12,000 murders in this country.

it's outrageous that we accept that as a nation. we're a nation that -- you're going to compare to us honduras and these other countries you that said? this is america. we cannot stand to have this many murders. >> that's an excellent point. excellent point. and we'll be right back with something from the nra that may interest you, after the break. [ bop ] [ male announcer ] could've had a v8. 100% vegetable juice, with three of your daily vegetable servings in every little bottle. omnipotent of opportunity. you know how to mix business... with business. and you...rent from national. because only national lets you choose any car in the aisle. and go. you can even take a full-size or above. and still pay the mid-size price. i could get used to this. [ male announcer ] yes, you could business pro. yes, you could.

go national. go like a pro. to volunteer to help those in need. when a twinge of back pain surprises him. morning starts in high spirits, but there's a growing pain in his lower back. as lines grow longer, his pain continues to linger. but after a long day of helping others, he gets some helpful advice. just two aleve have the strength to keep back pain away all day. today, jason chose aleve. just two pills for all day pain relief. try aleve d for strong, all day long sinus and headache relief. we believe the more you know, the better you trade. so we have ongoing webinars and interactive learning, plus, in-branch seminars at over 500 locations, where our dedicated support teams help you know more so your money can do more. [ rodger ] at scottrade, seven dollar trades are just the start. our teams have the information you want when you need it. it's another reason more investors are saying...

[ all ] i'm with scottrade.

we want to play you the new ad from the nra released today. slams president obama for his push for more gun control. watch this. >> are the president's kids more important than yours? then why is he skeptical about putting armed security in our schools when his kids are protected by armed guards at their school? mr. obama demands the wealthy pay their fair share of taxes, but he's just another elitist hypocrite when it comes to a fair share of security. protection for their kids and