Skip to main content

tv   Reliable Sources  CNN  March 3, 2013 8:00am-9:00am PST

8:00 am
china and the world." two senior scholars at harvard spent hours with inlegendary founder of singapore and presented his world views in this short book that is packed with intelligence and insight. if you are interested in the future of asia, which means the future of the world, you've got to read this book. now for the last look, harlem shake may be the top single. in egypt, tunisia, there's some serious harlem shaking going on. and it's causing leaders to tremble as it becomes a potent symbol of protest, revolt and defiance. take these kids to a school in tunisia. they danced to the song and posted exploits on youtube. that prompted a quarter of a million hits and reports of an investigation by the country's
8:01 am
minister of education and that prompted a backlash. video after video after video of tunesians proudly doing the harlem shake in defiance. and then there's egypt, where the authorities went further and the backlash was worse. four pharmaceutical students were arrested for doing this harlem shake in front of the pyramids and that set off a big reaction. late in the week in cairo, there was a mass shake in front of the muslim brotherhood headquarters to protest. now, who says america's popular culture exports have no value? the answer to our question of the week was, arnlsh "a." according to the vatican city, it has about 450 official citizens, many of whom actually live else where. according to the cia fact book the total population, including citizens of other nations who live there is around 800. thanks to all of you for being part of my program this week. i will see you next week.
8:02 am
stay tuned for "reliable sources." bob woodward is best known for vacuuming upinformation from one white house to another. this week he went to war with this white house. after criticizing president obama's handling of the budget battle, upped the ante by saying the administration was pushing back hard at him. >> it was said to me in an e-mail by a top -- >> what was it. >> it was said very clearly, you will regret doing this. i mean, it makes me very uncomfortable to have the white house telling reporters, you're going to regret doing something that you believe in even though we don't look at it that way, you do look at it that way. but it turns out the white house e-mail gene spurling said he was offering that advice as a friend.
8:03 am
so did woodward falsely suggest this was an attempt at intimidation? are the media swallowing the obama line on the deep budget cuts that just took effect? michelle obama on another tv blitz with some critics giving one appearance a big thumbs down. >> now for the moment we have all been waiting for. and the oscar goes to -- "argo." congratulations. >> are the media surrendering the airwaves to the first lady? plus, how did yahoo! melissa mayor go from silicon valley icon -- >> doesn't matter which way you cut it. this woman is seen as a rock star and superstar in the ceo streets of the world. >> to media ridicule for asking workers to show up at the office. i'm howard kurtz and this is "reliable sources."
8:04 am
bob woodward has been embroiled in controversy since he and carl bernstein were unearthic the watergate scandal, but this one is different. president obama was wrong in insisting that the white house didn't suggest the automatic budget cuts before the republicans agreed to them. then woodward accused the president of changing his stance on whether the current round of budget cuts would include tax increases, as well as spending cuts. >> you talk about the president moving the goal posts. what do you add? >> he was absolutely desperate to get something. so, he got his benefit and now he wants to come back and say, wait a minute, let's put some taxes in here which he agreed in the sequester not to do. >> the evidence on that point is mixed. but woodward doubled down by disclosing that a top white house official had yelled at him in a lengthy phone call and then
8:05 am
e-mailed that woodward would "regret taking this position." when politico obtained the actual e-mail the tone was, well, less than threatening and that became a story in itself. >> i apologize for raising my voice in our conversation today. >> but i do truly believe you should rethink your comment about saying that the president asking for revenues is moving the goal post. >> i know you might not believe this, but as a friend, i think you will regret stacking out that claim." jackie kucinich and tim carney political senior reporter for "washington examiner." doesn't it kind of look like bob woodward exaggerated this apparent push back from the white house? >> look, i love it when anyone
8:06 am
challenges the government whether it's republicans or democrats. he stepped in it. he went too far and he got caught with his hand in the cookie jar. not just jean sterling's e-mail but his e-mail back to him. oh, my friend, you never have to apologize to me. >> woodward responding to sperling. you get wound up because you were making your points and you believe them. i welcome a little heat. more given the importance. i also welcome your personal advice. so, woodward make a mountain out of a relative e-mail mole hill? >> when jack lew and president obama said, we didn't want the sequester that jack lew and president obama were being misleading. they may have been dishonest. if woodward stopped there, it would have been great. making it sound like he was
8:07 am
threatened and even the goal post saying he went too far. he should have stopped after he did his part of reporting. >> he didn't say he was threatened. i think it was the clear implication but bob woodward reporting on administrations for four decades be intimidated by one angry phone call and an e-mail? >> it sounds like he blew this out of proportion. one particular publication that reported this happened and then debunked it like three days later. and by really saying, it rhymes with molitico and there was a little bit of that going on and other publications, of course, were jumping into it. i think he had help blowing this out of proportion. >> the right wing also jumped in. the right wing media saying look what the obama administration is doing. they back pedaled. oh, bob, what did you do? >> i did snarky tweets until the full e-mail came out and then you realize the white house --
8:08 am
>> involved in the position where you're getting those e-mails. every single one of us have. that's part of the exchange with some of these officials in all ranks of government. >> i want to pick up your point about the conservative media, but i don't want to let this slide. the number of journalists have been saying that the obama white house, in particular, is very aggressive in pushing back against stories that it does not like, that officials can raise their voices and use words we can't repeat on television. you had that experience yourself? >> i have had colleagues. i covered congress and the romney campaign and i don't cover the white house. i heard about, you hear that, i don't think that's unique to this administration. and i'm not saying -- >> this is a contact sport, but a lot of people say the obama white house, you would think because as a democratic white house would get along better with journalists but, in fact, rougher on journalists than some of its predecessors. >> i think everybody is doing their job, if it is. >> let me play more sound for you. bob woodward the other day talking about this very question. did he mischaracterize or
8:09 am
overdramatize, shall we say, the e-mail from sperling. let's go with that first. >> do you think you overstepped the way you described this scenario? >> no, the e-mails speak for themselves. it's often a technique employed by white houses unintentionally or intentionally to say, oh, let's make the conduct of the press the issue rather than what they did. >> and sperling, the white house economic czar was out on several shows this morning. let's see what he said about this contra talk with woodward. >> bob and i have known each other for 20 years and always had a friendly and respectful relationship. anybody that looks at the e-mails that went from me and came back from him can see that there's respect and friendliness. >> does the president think that is a good idea to say to reporters that you're going to regret staking out that claim? >> david, i had a 20-year relationship with bob woodward.
8:10 am
those e-mails are very substantive. they're cordial. >> are you threatening him in any way? >> of course not. >> david gregory on "meet the press." gene sterling is saying no big deal. he wants to put this aside and talk about the administration. >> now, there's a lot i disagree with the administration on. gene is basically 100% right. when he told bob woodward, hey, you might regret this. turns out he was exactly right. bob woodward totally regrets it. at this point everybody is talking about how woodward screwed up. >> instead of talking about the fact that obama and jack lew were misleading when they said they didn't want the sequester. the president and the secretary of the treasury are very comfortable revising history in a false way, just to make them severals look better. >> not talking about his reporting, but talking about him. no reporter wants to be the story. >> unless you like having your name in lights which woodward doesn't need, of course.
8:11 am
a clear idealistic, some defending woodward liberal commentators who, who feel that obama is being attacked unfairly, but i can't help but notice because woodward went on sean hannity fox new show that people on your side of the political spectrum who never had much use for bob woodward and now hailing him as a truth teller because he's taking it to the white house. little bit of ideological convenience there. >> it's red shirt, red jersey, blue jersey is what i describe people get on a team and root for whoever is attacking the other team without paying very much attention to the detail of the matter and i think conservatives are doing that now. >> the funny thing is, everybody confused to why woodward is so aggressive against obama. three books that were incredibly soft on bush and hard on obama. woodward is a republican. it's not that big -- >> he would not identify himself with either party. you're characterizing --
8:12 am
>> i would be really surprised if woodward wasn't voting republican. >> you describe his books as soft on bush. the last book was very critical of bush's -- but he had cooperation from the obama white house and writing the behind the scenes narrative. maybe next time, not so much, buddy. >> that's a really important point and one that is the most important out of all of this. it's about access. if you don't play ball, your access gets taken away. that's the most dangerous thing in the media. media has to rally left wing, right wing, center. we're not going to let you get away with that any more. you'll have to report it as it is. >> individually, every reporter has to be ready to lose access. if you're not going to be telling the truth. if you're constantly guarding your access to power. >> i have to ask you this because i'm sure some people out there watching today are thinking, we're having $85 billion in automatic budget cuts, the so-called sequester taking effect. impact on people's lunch.
8:13 am
you in the media are talking about bob woodward versus gene sperling and this must seem like inside the beltway ball to a lot of folks. >> it is inside the beltway ball. there was this great question by paul that was about how this is like the weirdest washington inside the beltway naval gazing story ever because it really, really is. this is washington crystalized. >> because it involves a couple well-known personalities in this feud, but in your view, perhaps overplaying it a tad? >> yes, absolutely. >> at the same time, the access issue is important. >> the larger issue and, you know, frankly sharing private e-mails is a little bit, as a reporter, is a little bit unsavory. >> who actually put out the e-mails? >> that's the thing? >> i'm going to go on a limb and say probably it was the white house. >> but i am saying that as a reporter you think about the private e-mails you're sending back and forth to sources, no, the larger issue, of course, we're talking about access.
8:14 am
we're talking about bob woodward, i think it's a little over -- >> let me get to the substance in the remaining time. how television is covering and has been covering up until they took effect friday at midnight the so-called sequester budget cuts. >> the white house stepped up its campaign to pressure republicans. and listing the secretary of homeland security to suggest that the layoffs could make it more difficult to prevent terrorist attacks. >> 10,000 teachers could lose their jobs. airport security could be cut by $323 million, 70,000 kids would be kicked off head start. >> planes won't fly, trains are going to suffer. troops are going to feel the belt tightening in all branches of the service. >> suquesteration isn't going to mean armageddon for america, but the press and political class, mostly on the left, are trying to tell you otherwise. >> you're nodding your head, tim
8:15 am
carney. >> that the sky is going to fall and cats and dogs are going to be sleeping and all that stuff. use the word massive when they're talking about sequesteration. less than 3% of a cut. so, yes, i think they're way overplaying it. >> i agree with tim, again, on this issue. i love ed, but, come on. everybody is getting fired. the world is on fire. i don't believe the government, i think that they're hyping it up. i think it's politics. >> i think there is room for a lot more skeptical reporting. "washington post" had a great front-page story the other day, arne duncan who said, "there are literally now teachers who reting gore are getting pink slips. little investigation that is not the case." if the press had put in, say, 10% of the effort that was investigating beyonce's lip syncing to the actual effect of these budget cuts. when we come back, mitt and
8:16 am
ann romney's first interview. we'll look at the chris wallace sit down in just a moment. (train horn) vo: wherever our trains go, the economy comes to life. norfolk southern. one line, infinite possibilities. it's not what you think. it's a phoenix with 4 wheels. it's a hawk with night vision goggles. it's marching to the beat of a different drum. and where beauty meets brains. it's big ideas with smaller footprints. and knowing there's always more in the world to see. it's the all-new lincoln mkz.
8:17 am
out for drinks, eats. i have very well fitting dentures. i like to eat a lot of fruits. love them all. the seal i get with the super poligrip free keeps the seeds from getting up underneath. even well-fitting dentures let in food particles. super poligrip is zinc free. with just a few dabs, it's clinically proven to seal out more food particles so you're more comfortable and confident while you eat. a lot of things going on in my life and the last thing i want to be thinking about is my dentures. [ charlie ] try zinc free super poligrip. executor of efficiency. you can spot an amateur from a mile away... while going shoeless and metal-free in seconds. and you...rent from national. because only national lets you choose any car in the aisle...and go. you can even take a full-size or above, and still pay the mid-size price. now this...will work. [ male announcer ] just like you, business pro. just like you.
8:18 am
go national. go like a pro. nlove. as americans, we believed we can'tin freedom.person we that's what i fought for as a marine, and that's what we believe in as republicans. freedom means freedom for everyone. i didn't use to understand the importance of same-sex marriage, but after learning my brother was gay i wanted the same rights for him. he was the best man at my wedding and i want to be the best man at his. it's only fair that calvin should have the freedom to marry the person he loves, too. it's time for marriage. so, i'm working on a cistern intake valve, and the guy hands me a locknut wrench. no way! i'm like, what is this, a drainpipe slipknot? wherever your business takes you, nobody keeps you on the road like progressive commercial auto. [ flo speaking japanese ] [ shouting in japanese ] we work wherever you work.
8:19 am
now, that's progressive. call or click today. i use bounce outdoor fresh sheets because they're just that much fresher and they help keep static off in the cold so my clothes will never embarrass me. mommy, i dressed the snowman! how do you get your bounce? less static year-round. mitt romney with his wife, ann, breaking their post-election silence with an interview on fox news sunday and host chris wallace asked him among other things about that post-election conference call, which leaked, of course. in which romney talked about how president obama won the election
8:20 am
by giving gifts to various constituencies. let's take a look. >> fairly or not, you know a lot of republican leaders roasted you for those remarks. did that hurt? did in a sense did you feel you were being pushed out of the party? >> i'm not going to second guess what people had to say. i don't look back, i look forward. >> you never like it. and i'm like a she-lion when it comes to defending mitt. >> from what you saw wallace asked the questions on why romney lost the elections and a lot of people think fox is soft. >> i thought the first part of the interview was definitely too soft and might have been, really, because the she-lion was sitting there. the second half of the interview ann wasn't there. it was one-on-one and wallace was more cutting in his questions. even in the last question he asked, which was critical, he softened it. the first half, i thought, was too soft. >> chris usually does a much better job that the average fox
8:21 am
host to be fair. he's not sean hannity and representing the republican party, so, i don't take issue with chris' questioning. it was pretty good overall. do they feel better about it and you got the sense ann romney definitely feels bitter and mitt romney is trying to get beyond it, et cetera. he got to the essence of why he thought they lost, which they're still wrong about. obama-care was a gift and latinos wanted obama-care and that's why they voted for obama. that's not true. that just makes himself feel better. that's not the case at all. >> to romney's yecredit, he sai he made mistakes in the campaign. >> i don't think anyone expected him to come out and be a different person. >> so somebody who had tried to cover that campaign and had little access to romney and his inner circle, what did you make of the interview? >> i think it's newsworthy
8:22 am
because the better part of last two years covering him. the fact what he's doing now is absolutely newsworthy, but i think, you know, he rightly said that he accepted responsibility. that the campaign accepted responsibility for what they did wrong and they didn't reach out to minorities. he didn't say how they could have done that better. but, yeah, i think that it was, it was interesting. but, also, on the second part of the interview, i didn't hear anything new. i heard, pull the string mitt romney talking points that i listened to all last year. >> let me play a second bite from the fox news interview and here, ann romney was asked about whether or not the country got a good picture of her husband or a picture of him as being rich and out of touch. the descriptions we heard so often during the 2012 campaign. >> it was partly true, but it was not just the campaign's fault, i believe it was the media's fault, as well. is that he was not giving, being
8:23 am
given a fair shake that people weren't allowed to see him for who he was. >> media's fault, as well? >> i think a republican blaming the media for being unfair to it is like a football player saying, oh, we lost because it so cold in this playoff game in november. she is wrong where the media was at all fault. i didn't think the media was too hard on mitt romney, i thought the media was too soft on barack obama and didn't go into his deceptions or problems of his first term. >> they were rich and out of touch, that was the problem. that's the one thing the media did do right. present it that way, it's true. >> the fact that they are rich is a fact. whether they're out of touch is an opinion. >> okay. >> some thought the media provided a kind of caricature of the romneys. but at the same time, always came back to the question, what was romney doing giving very few interviews, by the way, to drive a positive message about
8:24 am
himself. >> they covered it accurately. the obama campaign pushed the bain days and destroyed a lot of jobs. >> his years as a venture capitalist at bain capital. >> secondly, he said the 47% number. so, you can't blame the media for covering it. >> 47% of americans about benefits. >> people within the campaign who wanted thime come out more and be more of himself and even at the end people were saying, i don't know this guy. >> i think that is romney. the romney is the guy saying to his rich donors, hey, 47% are bums. >> so you're saying don't blame the media for that portrait. >> the media did their job in showing you who romney really was. >> comes down to the fact that romney somehow didn't think it was his job to push these stories. when romney finally said, i'm being misrepresented on what i said about detroit, you got
8:25 am
people fact checking obama and misleading. it took until the last debate. >> let me jump in, we could talk about this for the next couple of hours. dennis rodman just back from a trip from north korea, the eccentric former pro basketball player talked to george stefnepilous about his meeting with kim jung-un. >> he want obama to do one thing. call him. >> he wants a call from president obama? >> that's right. he said, if you can, dennis, i don't want to do war. i don't want to do war. he said that to me. >> one question i didn't hear which is, dennis rodman, what are you doing going to north korea and meeting with this leader and a guy who allows no human right and testing nuclear weapons that he could use against the u.s. when did dennis rodman become an american pseudo diplomat. >> i think you're right, it was a weird interview. >> to stephanopoulos' credit. rodman said he may go back to north korea a second time.
8:26 am
report on human rights abuses and maybe you should read it and ask him about it. kind of making clear that didn't know what he was talking about when it comes to the communist country. >> this is part of the problem. you get an athlete to talk about politics and you expect them to say something intelligent and some of them can and some of them can't. >> he went with vice and vice usually does terrific documentaries and we'll have to see what the final product is. but he's, obviously, not prepared for what north korea actually is. he came back and said kim jung-un was awesome and i don't like him, i love him. that's just, that's ridiculous. >> is that a technical diplomatic term. awesome. >> thanks very much for stopping by this morning. up next, my two cents on sean hannity's shout fest with democratic congressman keith ellison. which one behaved badly? , you t. except it's 2% every year. go to e-trade and find out how much our advice and guidance costs.
8:27 am
spoiler alert: it's low. it's guidance on your terms, not ours. e-trade. less for us. more for you. i'm up next, but now i'm singing the heartburn blues. hold on, prilosec isn't for fast relief. cue up alka-seltzer. it stops heartburn fast. ♪ oh what a relief it is! these are sandra's "homemade" yummy, scrumptious bars. hmm? i just wanted you to eat more fiber. chewy, oatie, gooeyness... and fraudulence. i'm in deep, babe. you certainly are. [ male announcer ] fiber one. [ man ] excuse me miss. [ gasps ] this fiber one 90 calorie brownie has all the deliciousness you desire. the brownie of your dreams is now deliciously real.
8:28 am
chances are, you're not made of money, so don't overpay for motorcycle insurance. geico, see how much you could save.
8:29 am
8:30 am
sean hannity isn't exactly known for being shy but when he got into the heated confrontation, it was the guest that picked the fight. keith ellison went on the offensive immediately after
8:31 am
hannity tried to blame president obama for the stalemate. he did it in a highly personal way. >> you are the worst excuse for a journalist i've ever seen. what you just displayed was not journalism, it wasn't anything close to try to tell the american people what is really going on and, i mean, just shocking to me. >> to play obama in his own words is yellow journalism. >> i have to say, hannity tried to engage ellison in some kind of conversation, but the minnesota lawmaker kept talking over him, barely allowing him to ask another question. >> i was there august 2011 when the republicans, your party, which you shamelessly -- >> i'm not a republican. let me correct the record. >> you are nothing but a republican. yes, you are. >> sir, sir, i am a registered -- sir, congressman. i am not a registered republican.
8:32 am
i'm a registered conservative. >> now, hannity often defends the gop, but he isn't a registered republican. what was troubling here that ellison accepted the invitation to come on and then only attacked hannity. in this case, he wasn't wrong. ellison told me in a statement i stood up to sean hannity because of what the sequester will mean for millions of americans who will be forced to work harder while they get by with less. the president is not being an alarmist in chief or president panic when he talks about these cuts, he is leading. i have to deduct on what hannity did later in the week having written two papers as a law student and suggesting that ellison might be the "equivalent of the cku klux klan." with that. coming up, michelle obama's
8:33 am
media blitz. is the first lady information that matters...art my individual health profile. not random statistics. they even reward me for addressing my health risks. so i'm doing fine... but she's still going to give me a heart attack. we're more than 78,000 people looking out for more than 70 million americans. that's health in numbers. unitedhealthcare.
8:34 am
8:35 am
8:36 am
. michelle obama has become more of a television presence
8:37 am
than any first lady, at times she seems to be everywhere. >> what have you accomplished with let's move and what remains to be done? >> when we started, there were a lot of people in this country who would have never thought that childhood obesity was a health crisis. >> this is my mid-life crisis. the bangs. i couldn't get a sports car, they won't let me bungee jump, so, instead i cut my bangs. >> you went for the bang. you're the boss of your hair. >> i can do this. this is all mine. ♪ >> there's so many different activities you can do indoors or outside. get moving. it's good for you. >> one, two, three, four, five, six, seven, eight. >> getting tired just watching this. her decision to join the oscars and announce the best picture
8:38 am
award for ben affleck and "argo" which left some pundits asking, how much is too much? >> she's the first lady, she's not just a hollywood celebrity. >> i heard a lot of people say, not too sure about the academy awards. >> should she have been there at all? >> from my vantage point, absolutely not. this is not a horrible crime in the scheme of things. she was an uninvited guest. >> joining us now to examine the first lady's media blitz sally quinn and in new york barbara lippert. sally quinn, clearly, michelle showing up at the oscars rubbed some people the wrong way. overreaction? >> i was absolutely baffled by the reaction. i thought it was fine. what i thought was that our movies, the american movies are the greatest ambassador we have to the world. even our worst enemies. even the taliban, even kim
8:39 am
jung-un, i mean, all of these people watch american movies and they're riveted by it. they're all watching this show and out comes our first lady who is a black american woman who can appeal to people in developing countries and she's talking about the importance of the message that we're trying to send. the american people. >> are you suggesting some of the criticism might be by the fact that she's an african-american woman? >> no, i'm saying that is a positive thing for the united states. i think she was a great ambusder for this country, as our movies are. i thought it was a brilliant idea to have her on there. >> the one thing that struck me as potentially valid, barbara lipert, in all the media chatter about this. if you don't want to watch michelle obama on jimmy fallon or "ellen" you can turn it off. when this mass event where we all watch the oscars every year, people didn't know it was coming and therefore they couldn't avoid her. >> that's exactly right. i did she did elevate an evening
8:40 am
that really needed elevating. she lent some grown up at it. but it wasn't her terms and her agenda. when she's on jimmy fallon and with big bird, she's so delightful. even the worst curmudgeon on the right could not criticize her for getting kids moving. the white house thing was a little awkward, a little staged, a little stiff. the beaming military behind her certainly didn't help and just opened the door for conservatives to criticize her about the hollywood money and donors. >> well, i thought it was a great idea. and i thought that she, you know, we're looking for so many ways to improve our image across the world. and i think -- >> what about this point, yes, there were military people behind her and -- >> you know that they were having the governor's conference dinner that night. she was already in black tie and those mill fare people were escorts. they always have escorts at the white house parties. >> but i think maybe what's at the heart of this, why it is a
8:41 am
media story, beside the fact that we like talking about michelle obama and her bangs is that it maybe seems in this second term that she's more enamored of being a celebrity as opposed to carefully staging her media appearance to drive an agenda, in her case has to deal with childhood obesity. >> i think she needs to focus exactly on what she wants to achieve. i think the childhood obesity is a great thing to do. some criticism of her recently saying why didn't she focus more, why doesn't she focus more on women's issues the way hillary clinton does. she could do that and i think the more attention she gets, the more people will respond to her. i think this is a way for her to do it. >> there has been some criticism even from liberal columnists, why doesn't michelle obama take on more issues, issues that are less safe, given her popularity
8:42 am
as first lady. barba barbara, instead, we get all of this talk that she's hanging out with the liberal hollywood crowd. >> right. i think that her initiative, the let's move initiative is about women. it's about families. it's about human beings and children and the women that l little girls will become. she is connecting on that level. she said, whatever i do, i will get criticized for. i understand that. even if it's as dumb as my hair and my bangs. i think she is taking something which is beyond criticism, which is her let's move agenda and i think the appearance that oscars may have diluted that a little and opened her to people saying she is overexposed. >> i think the first lady has a healthy attitude towards all the static that swirls around her, even my bangs can start a national conversation. at the same time, if you're not, if you don't particularly like the obamas. another administration and another first lady for those who are on the other side of the political fence, can it, are we reaching a point where it seems like they're inescapable,
8:43 am
they're on everything. president at the super bowl and michelle at the oscars. there could be some danger in that kind of overexposure. >> they are the president of the united states. >> that doesn't mean they have to visit us every single day. >> no, i just want to say one thing. are they going hollywood? first of all, hollywood is liberal. and obamas are liberal. and, so, there is always going to be that kind of collection. clinton eastwood was as hollywood as they could get. >> his reviews weren't as good. >> complaining about her going hollywood is a little over the top. >> barbara, is this a phony media controversy that we use to fill some of the time in between talking about the sequester -- >> she's so delightful and beautiful, that we love talking about her. but the thing is she's not the person to appear from the white house at the academy awards. franklin del nor roosevelt did a radio show where he spoke for six minutes including the things
8:44 am
the lease act and laura bush appeared in a film about films in 2002 and she said her favorite movie was "giant" because the guy was falling apart and destitute. >> i guess other politicians have appeared on sesame street with big bird, but this seemed more memorable. why are the media on melissa mayor on the ban over employees working at home. ♪ my friends, they do surround me ♪ ♪ i hope this never ends ♪ and we'll be the best of friends ♪ [ male announcer ] introducing the reimagined 2013 chevrolet traverse. all set? all set. with spacious seating for up to eight. imagine that. chevrolet. find new roads.
8:45 am
8:46 am
8:47 am
8:48 am
try capzasin-hp. it penetrates deep to block pain signals for hours of relief. capzasin-hp. take the pain out of arthritis. when marissa mayer left google to take over yahoo! she was a young ceo who happened to be pregnant at the time. she got a big platform with a "today" show interview. >> a lot of people, of course, know you took on this job of being ceo but you had another big job of being mom. >> i have been ceo for seven months and i would say that i wouldn't miss a minute of either experience. they have both been great. does take a lot of focus. >> but now the press seems to have turned on mayer in the wake of a memo ordering employees who work at home to start coming to
8:49 am
the office every day or lose their jobs. >> every one was looking to her as the 37-year-old new woman face of a ceo fortune 500 company and she's adopted the boys rules of everybody come to campus. >> show up at the office or quit. that's the memo that yahoo! just sent its employees. >> barbara lippert, why are the media making this so intensely personal, long running dispute of work and family when it comes to marissa mayer? >> it comes down to e-mail. the employees were so outraged at getting this thing from hr. it wasn't even her internal memo, it was from human resources. they were all outraged that they sent it to cara to leak it. >> cara swisher working -- >> so, it was leaked in the worst possible way. even if it makes sense, you know, yahoo! has been a struggling company forever. it has no distinct advantage in
8:50 am
the marketplace. she really needs all hand on deck and to do whatever she has to. but she needs to do it in a flexible way. if she built herself a nursery, the one yahoo! nursery will make your life easier. we're going to have vans going back and forth all the time, we understand you're working parents. so, if you have a sick child, you can bring your child to the yahoo! nursery rather than announcing if you have the cable guy coming, you might use your judgment, but otherwise, you're out of luck. >> i have to ask you sally quinn, if a male ceo issued the same policy, would there be this kind of media storm? >> well, there are all these extenuating circumstances. i mean, we just heard that she built herself a nursery with her own money. how many people can do that and where are they going to get the space? >> paid more than $100 million and did build a nursery right next to her baby next to her office. she doesn't have to worry about leaving the baby. >> what that does is wipe out
8:51 am
any credibility she has on this issue. i think today if a male ceo made the same request or demand of the employees, there would be an outcry and there would be an outcry because what happens in a lot of these offices and particularly in the internet, people do work at home. they often are more productive at home. now, i think people are looking at this as black or white. either you can work at home or you can't work at home. well, obviously, for instance, at "washington post," if everybody worked from home, there would be nobody in the office. so that's not going to work. certain people who can and certain people who can't depending on what their jobs are. i, for instance, work from home but go into the office two or three times a week and i think it's important for me to be there because we have meetings and we talk to each other. >> it's not black or white. >> exchange ideas. it's dran make any sense. >> by the way, barbara, many men
8:52 am
telecommute but somehow morphed into a debate about working mothers. >> absolutely. the engineers are going to be up in arms too. she comes off as terribly impers you when i think she's just tone deaf. you showed a clip of the "today" show and she chose to go on the "today" show to show the new design of the front page, when yahoo! has a deal with abc and the very day she was on the "today" show robin roberts returned and they got a million more viewers. when she did reveal the new home page there was nothing new there. savannah guthrie almost said as much. so she also when interviewed she speaks in power point. people want her to say oh, something more than the baby is fun and her job is fun. they want her to be a role model for women and she refuses to be. >> well the other thing, howie, she said she wasn't a feminist. but i don't know what that means. i mean, anybody who believes in equal equality is a feminist.
8:53 am
the idea of saying i'm not a feminist doesn't make sense. >> part of what's going on here, when she got this job and she was young, attractive, come from google and she was pregnant, media made her into a huge celebrity. how many silicon valley ceos can most name. once we built somebody like that up you know what next step is and now we seem to be tearing her down. >> right. >> final thought on that barbara, going through that cycle? >> we're not just tearing her down. she's, you know, this was a really bad move, a really hamhanded move out like that. >> maybe it was. but if this had been done at microsoft or some other way, we'd be debating the working policy, not steve balmer. we're debating marissa mayer because we made her famous and that made her a target. >> what she's advocating looks like a way backwards as yahoo! help people work at home. >> totally agree. >> we will end on this point of consensus and marissa mayer i
8:54 am
think needs to speak out and talk a little bit, defender herself rather than hiding behind pr people. thanks for joining us this morning. still to come, "the washington post" ends the ombudsman position. businessweek's over cover and the parting shot at the "new york times" and the cute animal tale that was too good to be true. media monitors straight ahead. on something that concerns all of us...obesity. and as the nations leading beverage company we can play an important role. that includes continually providing more options. giving people easy ways to help make informed choices. and offering portion controlled versions of our most popular drinks. it also means working with our industry to voluntarily change whats offered in schools. but beating obesity will take continued action by all of us. based on one simple common sense fact, all calories count.
8:55 am
and if you eat and drink more calories then you burn off you'll gain weight. that goes for coca cola and everything else with calories. finding a solution will take all of us. but at coca cola we know when people come together good things happen to learn more visit coke.com/comingtogether let's say you pay your guy around 2% to manage your money. that's not much you think. except it's 2% every year. does that make a difference?
8:56 am
search "cost of financial advisors" ouch. over time it really adds up. then go to e-trade and find out how much our advice costs. spoiler alert: it's low. really? yes, really. e-trade offers investment advice and guidance from dedicated, professional financial consultants. it's guidance on your terms, not ours. that's how our system works. e-trade. less for us. more for you.
8:57 am
8:58 am
time now for the media monitor, our weekly look at the hits and errors in the news business. the cover of bloomberg business week headlined the great american housing rebound but the cartoon illustration was a psychotic looking black man waving cash, a six yi latino woman and crazed woman african-american with a dog. how could any editor have thought these offensive stereotypes were okay to publish? josh told politico our cover illustration last week got strong reactions which reregret. our intense was not to incite or offend. now that is an understatement. the odd thing is the cover artist is a latino who sees nothing wrong with the drawing.
8:59 am
"the washington post" has abolished the ombudsman's job after 43 years, turning its back of having an in-house critic. they will name a reader representative to deal with outside complaints and write on-line but not produce a weekly column. this reader rep will not be a contractor with guarantee independence as the previous om budsmen were but a post employee. in a era of budget cutbacks this is a sad development and mistake. some journalists have been secretly taking money from the government of malaysia. one of them according to buzz feed is conservative commentator joshua trevino paid $390,000 over a three-year span and paid out smaller sums to other right leaning journalist was to white about malaysia. he lost his job about not coming clean to the payments lied to politico saying i was never on any malaysian entity's payroll. he now says the