have gotten paid for three tubbs, $28.50. but since they can't pay you below minimum wage, i got the minimum wage adjustment, which is $65.47. this is probably one of the hardest jobs i've ever done in my life, yeah. welcome to this ac 360 special report, the george zimmerman trial, not guilty. not guilty. two words that end in a trial that rifrted the country, a trial that brought to the surface difficult questions about justice and race, issues we'll talk about over the next two hours and for days to come, no doubt about it. for the friends and family of trayvon martin, there is no closure, not at the end of the trial where a 17-year-old young man, a 17-year-old brother, a 17-year-old son is dead there is no closure, no matter the verdict. after the verdict, trayvon martin's father wrote that his heart was broken, but his faith is not. what happens next for george zimmerman remains to be seen. all we know right now is that the judge said he has no further business with the court.

with that, zimmerman left the courtroom a free man. martin savidge has more on the verdict and what happens next. >> in the circuit court of the 18th judicial circuit in and for seminole county florida, state of florida versus george zimmerman verdict we the jury find george zimmerman not guilty. so say we all, foreperson. >> after a 14-day trial and 16 hours and 20 minutes of deliberations, the wait of facing decades behind bars is lifted. >> your bond will be released. your gps monitor will be cut off when you exit the courtroom over here. and you have no further business with the court. >> thank you, your honor. >> a few minutes after the verdict, george zimmerman cracks his first smile. his parents, who both testified on his behalf, seemed to reserve their reaction while in court. his wife shelley fights back tears after hearing the verdict. and minutes after it was read, george zimmerman walks out of the court a free man.

trayvon martin's parents, who attended every day of the trial, were not in court for the verdict. >> first and foremost, on behalf of tracy martin and sybrina fulton, who are just heartbroken really right now, and we ask that you keep them in your prayers. >> reporter: they spoke through their lawyers and on social mete media. tracy martin tweeting god blessed me and sybrina with tray. and even in his death, i know my baby proud of the fight. zimmerman was title, his attorney speaking for him. >> obviously, we are ecstatic with the results. george zimmerman was never guilty of anything except protecting himself in self-defense. i'm glad that the jury saw it that way. >> trayvon martin! >> reporter: many did not agree. small protests against the verdict popped up around the country. >> i'm here to stand against the

racist system that has allowed trayvon martin to be killed without the prosecution of george zimmerman. they didn't want to arrest him in the first place. >> reporter: while the protests were largely peaceful, some scary moments in oakland, protesters smashing the windows of a transit police vehicle. today new questions over whether this really is the end for george zimmerman's criminal case. the naacp is now calling for new federal civil rights charges. >> when you look at his comments, and when you look at comments made by a young black man who lived in that neighborhood about how they felt especially targeted by him, there is reason to be concerned that race was a factor in why he targeted young trayvon. >> reporter: in his statement today, the justice department said in part experienced federal prosecutors will determine whether the evidence reveals a prosecutable violation of any of the limited federal criminal civil rights statutes within our jurisdiction. president obama, who famously weighed in on the case in the weeks after the shooting has not

touched on possible new charges, but did say in a statement today the death of trayvon martin was a tragedy, not just for his family or for any one community, but for america. i now ask for every american to respect the call for calm reflection from two parents who lost their young son. martin savidge joins me now live from sanford, florida. do we have any idea where george zimmerman is now, what he is doing? >>, no no we don't, anderson. good evening to you, by the way. right now it is a mystery as to where he is. i would probably -- i think i can say with assurance he is not in the city of sanford, and i would be surprised if he is each in the state of florida. his defense team wants it that way, because right now they still feel the threats against him are very real. >> joining me live is cnn legal analyst jeffrey toobin, sonny

hossain and mark geragos, author of how the criminal system works and sometimes doesn't. let's just get first impressions. jeff, what do you think? >> i had a contradictory reaction. i thought the jury's verdict was understandable. i'm not sure i would have resolved it the same way, but i certainly wasn't surprised. but i just felt tremendous sadness too. i thought this is a verdict that will -- a lot of people will view with great cynicism and will not reflect well on the american legal system or the american government. so i felt sad about that. but i also felt the jury was very understandable verdict. >> danny? >> well, i thought it was a -- i thought it was the correct verdict. in any verdict watch, whether it's a case of my own or a case like this that i'm observing, as the time approaches the verdict, everyone second guesses. i have to admit not guilty for

months and months and months. but for the last few hours before the verdict approached and when the question came out about manslaughter, i have to say i started to doubt my own convictions. and i think that happens to everybody. i think everybody would admit on some level, no matter how convince they'd were in the moments, the hour before, they may have changed their mind once or twice. >> mark geragos, i know you have been very against the prosecution for a long time. some say the district attorney overcharged in this case. what was your impression when you heard the verdict? >> look, anderson, i've been saying for weeks, this case was going to end in a not guilty. i also said that i thought that the prosecution was throwing the case, meaning i didn't think that they were legitimately trying this case. i will echo jeff. i have very mixed emotions about this. i assume there are other lawyers like myself who on friday i defend -- i had a 17

african-american client. tomorrow i have a couple of cases involving african-american clients. i think that the system is racist. i think the system does not get it right a lot of the times. i think this verdict was the just or right verdict, but for all the wrong reasons. and that's going the take us a lot longer than we've got here to discuss it. >> explain what you mean, if you can there. >> are so many problems with this. there are so problems with this case. number one, george zimmerman, if he was anybody but a cop, would have been anywhere else in america, and anybody who has ever been in the criminal justice system or done civil rights would tell you we he would have been arrested first and asked questions later. they never would have let him out that evening unless he was cop. so i understand having done this for 30 years why people are insane about that. because i would be insane about that if it was my client's family. having said that, once they put on this case and we saw what --

how they were put thong case, you -- and i told you every night, as much sympathy as i have for trayvon martin's family, this prosecution was abysmal. and it was abysmal for a lot of reasons. and i don't understand how the jury could have come and specifically how that jury could have come to any other conclusion. and when people say this is not about race, remember what happened the very first day or second day of jury selection. the judge found that the prosecution was making peremptory challenges based on race. they were -- she made a prima facia showing, or the defense did, she put two white women back on the jury after they had exercised that challenge. so that tells me that there was a judicial finding that the prosecution was engaging in race, racial profiling themselves.

and so when they then try to run away from that in the trial, which is what i think they did, there was no other result but a not guilty. and now people are justifiably cynical about the system. i think for all the wrong reasons. i think that this case is so complex, so nuanced, and it's so aggravating to me to watch commentators and people in the media talk about it in such a twitter, 140 character manner. because this case is so layered and is so -- it reaches into such the collective psyche of this country and the problems with race relations in this country, that i don't even know where to begin. it remind me when people and commentators were talking about, well, they had six mothers. they want just white women. they were mothers. well, that reminds me of what the d.a. thought when they were prosecuting o.j. simpson. that somehow the women on that jury who were african-american were going to be able to see beyond this and go somewhere

else. i mean, there is so much here to kind of mine and drill down on. and i hope we have the discussion as opposed to just doing what i think has been done, not in your show, but on other things when i was flipping the channel yesterday. >> yeah. >> i was aghast at some of the coverage i saw. >> and sunny hostin is actually stuck in traffic, which is why she is not here. she has been in the courtroom, a former prosecutor, been on the panel. she has really been on t voice on the panel who has believe they'd could convict on second-degree murder. i'm curious to see what her reaction was. angela cory spoke finally to reporters after the verdict last night. i just want to listen to what she had to say. >> we charged what we believed we can prove based on our florida standard jury instructions and based on the facts of the case. so that's why we charged second-degree murder. we truly believed that the mind-set of george zimmerman and the words that he used and the reason that he was out doing

what he was doing fit the bill for second-degree murder. >> mark, you've been very critical of angela corey. what did you think of that statement? >> i was bothered by it. it came across to me as very insincere. and i really believe that this case has been about a lot of political motivations. go to your earlier question, i feel sad and empty. but i thought for well over a year, as i have watched this and provided commentary throughout that this case was full of reasonable doubt. i understand proceeding maybe on a negligence claim where you were going to be seeking manslaughter, and you were going to be showing gross negligence, and you were going to show that he was in reckless disregard, and he shot too early, all those type of things. but to take this to a second-degree murder, starting high and going low, it's a travesty to me. i think that the state is primarily responsible. if there was going to be a conviction, then they should have proceeded on what they understood was a possibility.

not a probability, because it was a tough case under any circumstances. but the possibility of a manslaughter. but they went ahead. and, you know, two days before this trial ended, they switched their theory of prosecution. remember that dummy illustration, that hypothetical where the prosecutor got atop of the dummy and he pretended that he was trayvon martin? never did you see the reverse, where it was in fact trayvon martin on the bottom and george zimmerman on top. which is what the opening argument claimed, what all the first witnesses were about, to show that and the state knew that. they didn't have the forensics from the very beginning. so what they tried to do in my opinion was a fast one. they tried to sell the public and they thought they were going to fool the jury that in fact they had second-degree murder. they never had that. so i really think that the way they have handled this has caused a lot of these issues. they have caused a lot of the discussion that we've had that has been about race and such negative terms because we see it as defense lawyers every day. we see young black men being

abused by a system, and not proper remedies to deal with it. >> exactly. >> sunny hostin is just joining us. sunny, you were there throughout the trial every day. as i said earlier, you were probably the lone voice on the panel who believed a second-degree murder conviction was actually possible. what was your reaction when you heard the verdict? what happened? >> i was absolutely stunned. i think you can see that when i was on set. i was absolutely stunned. you know, as a lawyer, as a prosecutor, i accepted the verdict, and i accept the verdict. and i still believe in the system. but i think that justice failed trayvon martin. i really do. i think that there was enough evidence for a second-degree murder conviction. >> you think the prosecution proved its case? >> i do, i do. i think there was enough for a second-degree murder conviction. i think there certainly was enough for a manslaughter conviction. i did not believe the claims of self-defense. and i think that there was a miscarriage of justice yesterday. >> well, we've got to take a quick break.

we have a lot more to talk about. we're going to be on for the next two hours, until the 10:00 hour. we're going to hear from zimmerman's defense attorney mark o'mara who says he is somewhat surprised over the outrage of the verdict who says his client followed trayvon martin in the first place after being told not to. also, we'll talk to martin family material daryl parks. he was in the courtroom when the verdict was read. we'll ask him how the family is doing in light of the verdict, and what happens now. do they pursue a civil case? we'll be right back. ♪ let's go! ♪ [ male announcer ] you can choose to blend in. ♪ ♪ yeah! yeah! yeah! or you can choose to blend out. ♪ oh, yeah-eah! ♪ the all-new 2014 lexus is. it's your move. these are sandra's "homemade"

yummy, scrumptious bars. hmm? i just wanted you to eat more fiber. chewy, oatie, gooeyness... and fraudulence. i'm in deep, babe. you certainly are. [ male announcer ] fiber one. ...and a great deal. . thanks to dad. you certainly are. nope eeeeh... oh, guys let's leave the deals to hotels.com. ooh that one! nice. got it! oh my gosh this is so cool... awesome! perfect! yep, and no angry bears. the perfect place is on sale now. up to 40% off. only at hotels.com

...and we inspected his brakes for free. -free is good. -free is very good. [ male announcer ] now get 50% off brake pads and shoes at meineke. welcome back to this special report. shortly after the verdict last night, george zimmerman's bank robbery robert told piers morgan their family isn't celebrating because they'll always be concerned about safety. george's and their own. piers asked about whether or not george would still carry a gun. listen. >> he was handed back his gun as part of the process of being released. will he keep it? >> i don't have confirmation from him. i don't see any reason why he shouldn't. >> you think he'd be -- >> i think he has more reason now than ever to think that people are trying to kill him because they express they're trying to kill him all the time, every day. on my twitter feed, on the

internet. someone was just arrested today in florida for saying they were going to, you know, go on some shooting spree if george zimmerman got freed. >> zimmerman's attorney mark o'mara says zimmerman will have to be very careful about his safety because people said they won't listen to the not guilty verdict. earlier today, chris cuomo asked o'mara about the public's reaction to the verdict. >> let's begin with what is all around us, the reaction. a lot of it outrage to the not guilty verdict. are you surprised by that part of the reaction? >> i'm a bit surprised there's outrage because we had hoped everybody would look at this case as being a very fair trial where both parties were represented well. where i think most if not all of the evidence came out. and i think the jury took their time and deliberated and came up with a fair and just verdict. we've all agreed we should listen to a fair and just verdict. i hope that those people, even though they're frustrated, will accept the verdict. >> address the basic concern, which is your client, george

zimmerman, wound up killing trayvon martin and yet there is no legal responsibility, and people can't understand it. what are they missing? >> well, what they're missing is that george had an absolute right to be where he was. he also had a right to see where trayvon martin was. people want to say that it was improper profiling. the reality is with the circumstances that night and circumstances unrelated to trayvon martin, i think george had a reason to be concerned. when they met, it was trayvon martin who was the aggressor, at least by the forensic evidence. trayvon martin did not receive any injuries but the gunshot wound 45 seconds after george zimmerman was screaming for help. >> perhaps many people don't equate what happens to you when you get beat up with the proper justification for taking someone's life. >> and that's a frustration that people have. i share it with them. in this case, they had to look inside george zimmerman's head as he was on the ground with somebody unknown on top of him doing basically whatever they

were doing to him and him not returning any blows. >> does george zimmerman regret having to take trayvon martin's life, having to kill him that night? >> absolutely. absolutely. he's human. he did not want to take any person's life. >> thank you for taking the time to do this interview. i'm sure you share the hopes of all that we find a way to move forward after this verdict and that any wounds can be healed in time. >> absolutely. we still have a lot of conversations -- i have, and we have a lot of conversations to have. i've been an advocate for the fact that black youth in america are not treated well by the criminal justice system and we need to have that conversation. my fear is that we've polarized the conversation because we attach it to a self-defense verdict that they have nothing to do with. >> while sitting in the courtroom listening to all the testimony, it was difficult for trayvon martin's family to endure. martin's parents were there for most of the trial. they each testified.

they left the courtroom when photos of trayvon martin's dead they were not in the courtroom for the verdict. martin family daryl parks was there. he joins us now. first of all, i want to ask you about the martin family. how are they holding up? >> anderson, you know, obviously they were devastated last evening. as the day has progressed, they've gathered themselves together and really had a chance to think about moving forward and trayvon's legacy and trying to turn a situation into a positive. so we are encouraged by them and their fortitude to make sure that they, one, tell people to remain calm, but also now to build on trayvon's name and what his name will mean in american history. >> i know you were in the courtroom when the verdict was read. trayvon's parents weren't there. a lot of people were maybe surprised by that since they'd been in court every day. do you know why they decided they didn't want to be there at that moment? >> based on our advice, number one. we had already decided they probably shouldn't be in the courtroom.

anderson, this is a very tough issue for them. for them to have been through all of this for the last four weeks, we decided it was better to allow them to head home to miami since it was so late in the evening so they could attend church in miami. they were on their way home, and we informed them of the verdict. they were devastated. sometimes these types of situations have a lot of emotion tied to it. so we believed as their counsel that it was probably best they not be in there. >> the case has sparked national dialogue about race, really from the beginning of this. zimmerman's attorney said something last night after the verdict was read. i want to play that for the viewers and have you react to it. >> i think that things would have been different if george zimmerman was black for this reason. he never would have been charged for the crime. >> what did you think when you heard that? >> well, i don't accept that. maybe me and mr. o'mara are philosophically different on that issue.

i think he has to understand that in america, we see young black men go to jail for far less or far more time for similar type situations. so it's really an intellectual insult for him to say that to people when we all know if things were reversed and 28-year-old trayvon had killed 17-year-old white george zimmerman, he would have been locked up that day, no bond, and good luck. >> so you think the exact opposite is true from what o'mara said? >> of course. i mean -- and no one can deny -- anyone who denies that is being intellectually dishonest. >> the naacp is calling for the justice department to step in, bring civil rights charges against zimmerman. is that something that trayvon martin's family wants? >> as you know, we had -- we approached the federal government early on in this case about some of the issues in the

case, and they decided to give deference, as they often do, to state law. obviously, that's an option they have. the federal government makes decisions based upon what they want to do. so obviously any way that we could get justice -- remember, up until to point, this family has gotten nothing. they've gotten a half-hearted apology, never a full apology. we just want justice for trayvon. they've sat through that trial and seen the pictures of trayvon laying there. it's like a stab in the heart every time they see it, to see that picture. and yet the person who did this will not pay a price. he's blamed everyone. he never takes responsibility for him getting out of that car and going out there looking for trayvon. >> do you know when the family, when you will decide whether or not to bring a civil wrongful death suit against george zimmerman? >> well, we obviously have that option. we're looking at it. we're studying it close. there are a whole bunch of factors that go into when, where, and how.

we'll look at the possibility of that. >> do you know what factors, can you say what factors would go into it? >> number one, it's a far lesser standard. number two, when you think about possible defendants, you size them up and determine where they stand. unlike the lawyers who tried this case who do marital and criminal law, we are civil lawyers. i do this day in and day out. we'll size up and determine, is it worthwhile for us to do it, how we should do, and when we should do. >> daryl parks, i appreciate your time. thank you. >> thank you, sir. >> quick programming note. you can see more of chris cuomo's interview form morning on "new day." george zimmerman won this legal battle, but there's public outcry. in some places you're looking at pictures of rallies going on in san francisco and oakland. meanwhile, the naacp is calling for federal civil rights charges to be filed against zimmerman. we'll talk about that next.

and after nine years of working at walmart, i know savings. and right now we've got everything you need for a great summer. this 5-piece dining set on clearance, save over $49! marco! polo! this metal frame pool on rollback, you save $80! woo! fire up the savings. this 4 burner grill on rollback, you save $11. how bout all these bikes on rollback? like this mongoose adult bike, you save over $20! get more summer for your money at walmart's super summer savings event going on right now at your local walmart.

faso you want to save on autoof insurance?. drive a hybrid. get good grades. lose the bling. go paperless. combine policies. make automatic payments. and of course, talk to farmers. hi ♪ we are farmers bum - pa - dum, bum - bum - bum - bum♪ folks have suffered from frequent heartburn. but getting heartburn and then treating day after day is a thing of the past. block the acid with prilosec otc, and don't get heartburn in the first place. [ male announcer ] one pill each morning. 24 hours. zero heartburn. checking out of the hilton shouldn't be a pity party. your next trip is calling. saying, "deb, find a view for two at a conrad." or "make room for more at an embassy suites, deb." or "deb, lead a victory dance at a hampton." so chin up, love, and never stop vacationing. book during the great getaway for great rates at our ten top hotel brands. travel is calling you to hiltongreatgetaways.com.

welcome back. throughout the country there have been some rallies against the verdict. you're looking at pictures of a rally going on in san francisco. all day there have been protests, mostly small and peaceful. in sanford, florida, from new york to los angeles and outside the white house. many calling this a civil rights issue. the naacp has asked the justice department to file civil rights charges against george zimmerman. the justice department said its federal civil rights investigation continues and will look at evidence from the trial. on cnn's "state of the union," naacp president benjamin jealous says there's reason to be concerned that race was a factor in the targeting of trayvon martin. >> we're upset with the

situation in this country where as black people, as black parents, as parents raising black boys, black girls in this society, it feels so off that our young people have to fear the bad guys and the good guys. the robbers and the cops and the self-appointed community watch volunteer who thinks they're keeping folks safer. we want to finally live in that country that our kids say our country is every day. when they say the pledge, and they say this is one nation under god with liberty and justice for all, we yearn to be in that place. >> joining me now live, cnn "new york times" op-ed contributor charles blow. back with us, cnn legal analyst sunny hostin and criminal defense attorney mark garagos. charles, i was reading some of your tweets after the verdict. one of the things you said was now what do i tell my boys? what did you mean by that? >> i mean, i'm a father. i have three kids. two of them are boys, teenage

boys, a 19-year-old and 16-year-old. you know, this case you don't just look at the verdict. that's just like looking at the last few minutes of the game. you have to look at the entire sweep of this case and the entire criminal justice system and what it says to parents like me and boys like mine. it says that this is a fight on some level about the politics of brown bodies. in particular, about black, young masculinity. because you cannot separate what name. george zimmerman initially saw. he didn't even know trayvon's name. he had no idea about what he had done in school. he had -- none of that information. all he knew was what he told the dispatcher, what he was wearing, that he was young, late teen, he said. when he was asked what race he was, we realize he could see that he was dark-skinned and that he was walking slowly. so you have to say to yourself,

what about those few characteristics is the only thing you can see that makes this person suspicious? what is your organizing principle that makes him one of the punks? what is your organizing principle that makes him one of the people who always get away? what is your organizing principle that says i need to make sure that this guy does not get away because he is one of them? and what we find in the trial is that he was saying that he thought he was one of the criminals. although, what trayvon was doing was not criminal. >> you're saying you cannot take race out of one of those organizing principles. >> well, i think it is some combination of those. the only information he had was what he saw, right? so race is one of those things. youth and masculinity and race are three of the five things he could discern. that is a problem, particularly when you have to have conversations with young black men. i used to tell my boys, doesn't

don't run because they may think you're suspicious. now i have to say, don't walk slowly because that could mean your suspicious. we have to figure out what is the pace for which a black man can walk in america and be beyond suspicion. that's a crazy conversation to have. >> that's a sickening sentence to even think about. >> it's so fascinating that you say that because i have a young brown boy at home. he's been following this case so very closely. as a lawyer, as a former prosecutor, i've always told him, go to the police, call the police when you need help. you know, don't flee. run if you need to. don't fight. unless you absolutely have to defend yourself. what do i tell him now? as a mother, as a lawyer, what do i tell him now? it's fascinating. my husband and i were having this very same discussion. >> even the people who say, well, why doesn't trayvon just run home, right? we expect -- we're kind of putting on to the kid what adults would do. >> mark garagos -- sorry, mark o'mara during the closing was

silent for four minutes and said that's the amount of time he had to run home. >> right, right. we're basically saying, let's think like an adult would think. my youngest, 16-year-old, he has a 16-year-old twin sister. they're as big as me, but they don't think like adults. >> a teenager's brain is not fully developed. >> they make different sorts of choices and they make choices that make you remember they are children. and i can -- you know, we don't know what trayvon was doing, what's going through his mind. >> well, he did tell his friend on the phone, though, that he was going to walk fast. he was trying to get away. >> right. but this idea that why did he not go all the way home, and we want to rob him of any noble purpose, right. so there is a possibility of nobility there, which is that trayvon knows there is a 12-year-old boy who will soon be his younger stepbrother at home alone. he has tried to dodge this guy,

shake this guy off his trail. he cannot do it. what is going into the house, which is what zimmerman thinks he's going to do anyway -- he thinks he's going to break in. going into one of those houses confirms what zimmerman already assumes is he's going to do. and it means for trayvon i'm now taking the person who is following me and i cannot shake, i'm taking him to the 12-year-old who's alone at home. >> i do want to bring in mark garagos. mark, what's interesting, you were saying you believe the system is racist, that the justice system does treat african-americans differently. you see that in your own practice. you see that every single day in the courts. and yet -- >> right. this is what's so absolutely aggravating and why i get so worked up when we're on these panels. i understand -- and sunny, this is not a shot at you as a former federal prosecutor. when you hear people who say they're federal prosecutors or ex-federal prosecutors, they're

dealing with while-collar criminals in a federal court. >> not in d.c., though. you know that, mark. >> not in d.c. i know that. i know that. i understand. i'm talking about in the state courts across this country. every single day if you -- as i sit in a courtroom and watch nothing but young black males get processed in and out of courtrooms in this country for the, what i consider to be, the parking ticket of superior court. it usually involves some small amount of drugs or something drug related. 80% of the cases that come through the criminal justice system. and the absolute institutionalized racism when it comes to blacks is overwhelming. i do not think for a second, though, that we should be injecting or trying to correct that in one case where here it's almost the exact flip side of what happened. what happened here was you had

six white women or five white women on this jury. you talk about what charles was talking about, that organizing principle. i just call it -- and i called it a couple weeks ago, the prism through which they look. early on and one of the reasons i was all over sunny on this case was because i understand, i think, from sitting in the trenches that the prism through can they look is the same prism that george zimmerman looks when he sees trayvon martin walking there. then when you layer on all of the other nuances about this and you put on the woman who had the home invasion and you press all of those buttons, you play on and you absolutely build on this kind of archetype that is built into the system. and it is awful and it happens every day in the system. i hate the fact that now we've kind of looked at it kind of backwards, in my opinion.

in my opinion -- >> but what i don't understand is why -- i'm sorry, you are saying you do not belief race was a factor in this case, or -- because the prosecution went out of their way to not invoke race during the actual trial. >> let me show you again. when they started this jury selection, they started bouncing white women. why did they do that? because they were afraid, in my humble opinion, the prosecution was afraid that the white women were going to view trayvon martin through this prism of, as charles says, a young black male. if this had been a young black female, i don't think it would have been a problem. if had been a young white female, it would not have been a problem. it was a young black male. that's why they started bouncing white women, exercising their peremptory challenges, to the point where the judge granted a batson challenge and receded two of those white women. that was when this case was over. there was race from the beginning in those prosecutors' minds.

and instead of dealing with that, they ran away from it. and i'll go back to the other conundrum about this case. if george zimmerman was anybody but a cop, he would have been arrested that night. that's something that every young black male in america knows, and that's something that everybody who's in the criminal justice system knows. you do not kill somebody and get a pass. the cops arrest first and ask questions later. >> so when mark o'mara says that if george zimmerman was black, this never would have gone to trial, you believe that in george zimmerman had been black, he would have been arrested that night. >> if george zimmerman had been black, he not only would have been arrested that night, but you would have had those very same prosecutors playing into that same racism, and i will guarantee you that there are plenty of florida prosecutors, because i read the case when they get reversed is, who will play into that and argue and demonize that same prism when they've got the jurors who have

are going to be receptive to it. that's the schizophrenia about this case. >> so charles, to you, what is this -- i mean, does this case change anything? what -- can anything come out of this? >> well, it is an amazing focal point, right. i think mark is right in the sense that what makes this such an outlier is that -- it's not just that it is an adult and a child. that's one of them, that the adult is armed and the child is unarmed. there's disproportionate use of force. trayvon martin is using his hands however he's using them. george uses a gun. what we have to understand about that is that trayvon could not have legally ever matched force with him. you cannot have a conceal carry weapon as a teenager in florida. we're already out of sorts. the bigger point, i think, that upsets most people is there was a grown man standing over a dead boy when the cops arrived and

that person was allowed to talk his way out of a precinct and go home to his own bed. we see people killed all the time. there's gun violence, unfortunately, in america all the time. people die. we don't expect for the police to know who did it and to let them walk away from it. that, i think, is such an aberrant thing for us. for any person in america of good conscious, for any parent, for any person who feels like they could be on the other end of that gun barrel, that it forces a different kind of conversation. i think that focuses this particular case in a different way than other cases have been focused. >> we have to take a break, charles. thank you for being here. sunny and mark are going to be here again. up next, we're going to examine what may have been the key pieces of evidence in the trial, particularly the key piece, the 911 calls. prosecution says they proved their case, but certainly didn't sway the jury. we'll look at why not. be right back.

my insurance company told me not to talk to people like you. you always do what they tell you? no... try it, and see what your good driving can save you. you don't even have to switch. unless you're scared. i'm not scared, it's... you know we can still see you. no, you can't. pretty sure we can... try snapshot today -- no pressure. in miami, coca-cola is coming together with latino leaders to support hispanicize, and the adelante movement. teaching tools for success, and fostering creativity. these programs are empowering people to lead positive change, and helping them discover how great a little balance can feel. through initiatives like these, our goal is to inspire more than three million people to rediscover the joy of being active this summer. see the difference all of us can make, together. ♪

honey, is he too into this car thing? [ mumbling ] definitely the quattro. ♪ honey? huh? a5. what? [ sighs ] did you say something? ♪ to fly home for the big family reunion. you must be garth's father? hello. mother. mother! traveling is easy with the venture card because you can fly any airline anytime. two words. double miles! this guy can act. wanna play dodge rock? oh, you guys! and with double miles you can actually use, you never miss the fun. beard growing contest and go! ♪ i win! what's in your wallet?

>> one of the key pieces of evidence introduced in the george zimmerman trial were calls to police from the night of the deadly encounter. first, part of the call that george zimmerman alerted police to a stranger in the housing complex. >> are you following him? >> yeah. >> okay. we don't need you to do that. >> okay. >> then there's the 911 call made by a concerned neighborhood. neighbor, to where we hear in the background somebody yelling for help and the sound of a gunshot. >> 911, do you need police, fire, or medical? >> maybe both. i'm not sure. there's someone screaming outside. >> okay. what's the address that they're near? >> [ bleep ]. >> and is it a male or female? >> it sounds like a male.

>> and you don't know why? >> i don't know why. i think they're yelling help. but i don't know. just send someone quick, please. >> does he look hurt? >> i can't see him. i don't want to go out there. i don't know what's going on so -- >> tell them to come now. >> they're sending. >> so you think he's yelling help? >> yes. >> all right. what is your -- [ gunshot ] >> there's gunshots. >> you heard gunshots? >> yeah. >> how many? >> just one. >> that was a difficult piece of evidence. for jurors to consider. there was no definitive answer of who called out for help. remember, trayvon martin's parents testified it was their son's voice. george zimmerman's mother and father, a number of friends all told the court the voice was zimmerman's. let's go back to our panel. it's sunny hostin, jeffrey toobin and mark geragos.

you say the prosecution didn't do enough. what do you mean? >> i think the prosecution should have made this the center piece if that was their whole theory. i just think this idea of once they had, you know -- and i'll go back to -- and i don't want to sound like a broken record. once they had the jury they had, they needed to retool. they needed to figure out how they were going to appeal. as i often tell jurors when i select them, i don't care who you are as an advocate, you're not going to turn around somebody who's been living and has life experiences of 30, 40, or 50 years on this earth in ten days if you're the greatest most persuasive person in the world, you're not going to turn them around. you need to plug into what it is and how it is these jurors are going to view the situation. the idea of having that jury with that demographic and hoping that you're going to appeal to them or that they're going to be able to relate to rachel jeantel as your center piece, i just think, was a horrible calculation. >> how would you retool? >> and it hark enns back --

well, you can retool in a million ways. that is the funniest thing i may have ever heard. the evidence is what the evidence is. the prosecution puts on the evidence. they pick the order of the evidence. they pick who they're going to build their case around. the idea -- >> they don't get to pick their witnesses. they don't get to pick their witnesses, mark. >> oh, i understand that. but they put on who they want to put on. sunny, understand something. when you try case, you understand that you're the director of that play. >> you don't get the pick the actors. >> you're the one that puts on the case. >> you don't get to pick the witnesses. the defendant gets to pick them. >> you do -- what are you talking about? what are you talking about? >> the prosecution pick theirs witnesses. and they chose not to put certain people on the stand. >> they did. exactly right. they didn't put tracy martin on. >> now mark, how dare you steal my thunder. i was going with tracy martin. i was so excited. they didn't call tracy martin. they didn't call a number of people they had in their quiver

that would have given them some evidence, and when they didn't, look out. the defense did. >> exactly. you ultimately have that choice of quiver of witnesses to choose from. but the prosecution certainly selects. >> here is a strategic choice that i think was very significant, and i can't say it was wrong. obviously it was not successful for the prosecution. they put on all of george zimmerman's interviews with the police, fox news. they didn't have to do that. they basically put his defense on. now their argument was all these interviews showed that he had made inconsistent comments. he was a liar, thus he was guilty. if they hadn't called any of the witnesses, george zimmerman may have had to testify himself. and i think that might have -- >> yes, yes. >> and jeff, wouldn't you agree that if you're going to put on all of those taped statements by george zimmerman, and you know in a deposition that your lead detective at the time found nothing materially inconsistent

and you know you're going to get that baseball bat right between the eyes, why would you do that? as i explained at the time, sunny, and as jeff just said, you -- the defense could not have put on his statement absent him getting on the stand. why would you put that on? >> we got to take a break. >> you could choose that actor. >> all right. when we come back, we want to find out what everybody on our panel thought was a pivotal moment in this trial. we'll be right back. the chevy malibu offers an impressive epa estimated 34 mpg highway... and during chevs model year-end event you're getting a great deal on our remaining 2013 models, but they're going fast. what are you doing? moving in. before someone else does. ohhh...great. [ male announcer ] the chevy model year-end event. the 13s are going fast, time to get yours.

right now, get this great lease on a 2013 chevy malibu ls for around $169 a month. [ male announcer ] fight pepperoni heartburn and pepperoni breath fast with tums freshers. concentrated relief that goes to work in seconds and freshens breath. tums freshers. ♪ tum...tum...tum...tum... tums! ♪ fast heartburn relief and minty fresh breath. [ slap! ] [ male announcer ] your favorite foods fighting you? fight back fast with tums. calcium-rich tums starts working so fast you'll forget you had heartburn. ♪ tum tum tum tum tums enjoy the whole family at a homewood suites, schedule a 5 o'clock meeting at a hilton garden inn, or hit the links at a waldorf astoria. get great rates at our ten top hotel brands during the great getaway. book now at hiltongreatgetaways.com.

we're back with our panel. sunny hostin, denny cevallos, mark geragos and jeffrey toobin. how likely do you think it is the family will sue for civil damages? >> it's been reported they've already settled with the homeowners association. i don't know if that's true. next time you interview the lawyer, i would ask that and find out. if they've settled with the homeowners association, meaning they got some kind of a check in trade for a release, the only target left, i would imagine, unless they think they've got something against the cops themselves, is zimmerman himself. zimmerman himself, i would imagine all the money he's raised has gone to pay o'mara and west. he probably doesn't have much of anything. so i understand they could get a large verdict if they get the right jury, but it doesn't make a whole lot of sense to kind of

put them through that for a pyrrhic victory just to get a judgment. the bigger question is whether the feds are going to come in and whether the feds would come in and do what they did in the rodney king case out here in l.a. which was after the acquittals. in simi valley, then the feds came in and they prosecuted the officers for a violation of the civil rights in the rodney king case, and then they were able even though there were four acquittals. >> do you think they'll do that? >> i think that's a possibility. i would not discount it. >> jeffrey? >> i do. it's a serious possibility. the civil rights division has been much energized under eric holder. they've been much more aggressive in recent years than they were in the bush administration. i think they're going to look at it. >> what specifically do they look at versus what the state looked at? >> well, the gist of it is it's very similar except that the motivation underlying it, the intent level is not -- is intent to violate his civil rights, intent to harm him because he

was a black person. that's a different charge. >> or they could do a hate crime. >> an they've been looking at it. >> similar idea. >> they've been running this parallel investigation. they stated today very clearly they're still looking at it. i suspect it's a very real possibility. >> how much denny, do you think that's possible? >> what they have to prove is that not only was -- did george zimmerman attack him, but that it was based on his race. i certainly think they're going to look into it. to me, the federal government only likes to make cases that stay made. i think that mr. garagos can speak to that too. i just -- i think they're certainly going to look at it very closely. there's precedent for it just like mark mentioned in l.a. i don't know they want to invest their resources in a case like this. even with the heightened interest they have in cases like this. >> the problem for the feds in this is it's the same case. the only issue would be zimmerman's intent, just as the

only issue in this case would be zimmerman's intent. how you define guilty intent would be slightly different in a federal criminal prosecution. >> is it an easier rule? >> it's not so much easier. it's just different. >> well, there's a second problem, there's a second problem with them bringing the case federally. here in l.a. when they did it, originally you had simi valley, which was a predominantly white community with kind of law enforcement types. it's where the lapd flees to go live so they don't have to live in the inner city. when they bring it downtown to the federal court here and try them federally, you get a much different jury pool. the problem is, federally there in florida, your jury pool is going to be probably one in the same, which is not going to be helpful to get a guilty verdict. >> we got to take another break. everyone stick around. there's a lot more ahead in the next hour. we're going to the 10:00 hour tonight. we'll look at whether george zimmerman was overcharged. we'll also look at some of the key witnesses in the trial. we'll be right back.

the ones getting involved and staying engaged. they're not afraid to question the path they're on. because the one question they never want to ask is "how did i end up here?" i started schwab for those people. people who want to take ownership of their investments, like they do in every other aspect of their lives. happy birthday! it's a painting easel! the tide's coming in! this is my favorite one. it's upside down. oh, sorry. (woman vo) it takes him places he's always wanted to go. that's why we bought a subaru. (announcer) love. it's what makes a subaru, a subaru.

you deserve more than justo flexibility and convenience. so here are a few reasons to choose university of phoenix. our average class size is only 14 students. our financial tools help you make smart choices about how to pay for school. our faculty have, on average, over 16 years of field experience. we'll help you build a personal career plan. we build programs based on what employers are looking for. our football team is always undefeated. and leading companies are interested in our graduates. we'll even help you decorate your new office. ok. let's get to work.

that your mouth is under attack, from food particles and bacteria. try fixodent. it helps create a food seal defense for a clean mouth and kills bacteria for fresh breath. ♪ fixodent, and forget it. ♪ because what you dont know can hurt you.urance, what if you didn't know that it's smart to replace washing-machine hoses every five years? what if you didn't know that you might need extra coverage for more expensive items? and what if you didn't know that teen drivers are four times more likely to get into an accident? 'sup the more you know, the better you can plan for what's ahead. talk to farmers and get smarter about your insurance. ♪ we are farmers bum - pa - dum, bum - bum - bum -bum ♪