and a great weekend. "anderson cooper 360" starts right now. erin, thanks. we're following two big stories tonight. mounting concerns tonight that a government shutdown could become a reality in washington just three days from now. the latest on the shutdown showdown coming up. we begin with breaking news. the phone call that's making history. president obama called iran's new president, hassan rouhani, as he was heading to the airport in new york after his united nations debut. their conversation lasted about 15 minutes and ended more than three decades of silence at the highest level between the u.s. and iran. here's what president obama had to say about it. >> the two of us discussed our ongoing efforts to reach an agreement over iran's nuclear program. i reiterated to president rouhani what i said in new york. while there will surely be important obstacles to moving forward and success is by no means guaranteed, i believe we

can reach a comprehensive solution. now we're mindful of all the challenges ahead. the fact that this was the first communications between an american and iranian president since 1979 underscores the deep mistrust between our countries, but it also indicates the prospect of moving beyond that difficult history. >> president obama said both men have directed their teams to work quickly to pursue an agreement. after the call ended, rouhani's twitter account lit up. a picture was posted of rouhani on his plane describing the call as historic and then a message saying obama and rouhani agreed ground should be prepared for solving of other issues including regional matters. foreign ministers tasked with followup to expedite cooperation. after the handshake that didn't happen earlier in the week at the u.n., today's phone call is being scrutinized from every angle tonight. our chief national security correspondent, jim schiudo,

joins us now. how did this conversation even come about, first of all? >> reporter: here's how the white house puts it. they say they made it clear to the iranians early in the week that the president, president obama, that is, wanted to have direct contact, particularly this handshake we talked about. but the iranians at the time said, well, diplomacy takes time, this isn't the right time. it wasn't convenient for them. they cited problems back home in tehran. but the white house left the door open, and this morning the white house got a call from rouhani's people saying the president of iran would like to speak to the president of the united states before he leaves the country. obama said, "i'd be willing to do that," and they set up the call. in the last few minutes, we heard pushback from the iranian side saying that the call was totally unexpected. and that it was the white house when was reaching out again. it reminds me of the -- some of the backtracking we heard after president rouhani's comment earlier in the week to chris atte tian no, sir amanpour talking

about the holocaust and backtracking perhaps worried about reaction from home. but the white house and iranians were open to the call, and the call happened. >> yeah. preside the president's national security adviser, susan rice, said the idea for the call came from the iranians. we'll leave that aside. there you see a picture of the president making that phone call. i understand president rouhani, though, got out a little ahead of president obama in breaking the news. >> he did. in fact, i saw this tweet happen. it was a few minutes before the president was going to speak. and a little bit of disbelief. i started calling around cnn and to other officials saying, "is this true?" before you know it, a couple minutes later, president obama confirms it. but the other way president rouhani got out ahead was by tweeting the contents of the phone call, quotes about what they spoke it. for instance, how they said good-bye. president rouhani saying, "have a nice day" in english, president barack obama saying thank you, basically good-bye,

good be with you, in farsi. then they were deleted including substantive comments about their conversation b. there about "we're hopeful about what we will see from the p 5 plus one and your government in particular in the coming weeks and months." some of the contents of the phone call, but those tweets now deleted off of hassan rouhani's twitter account. we don't know why that is. maybe he's worried that he gave too much detail. maybe he's worried about the white house reaction. i mean, the president of iran is new at this. so he's probably learning about how far he can go. >> what do you know about how people in iran are reacting to all of this? >> we're hearing excitement. i'm seeing this on twitter. i'm hearing from friends of mine, dissidents that i know in iran, as well. and i've been to iran, been going there for more than ten years. been there ten times. in all my trips there, the thing that struck me about iranians, even during the most tense times between the u.s. and iran, people on the street would tell you we remember better times with the u.s. we want better connections with the u.s. in fact, many would say i've got relatives in the u.s.

it doesn't surprise me that you're hearing this. this country has been cut off from the outside world, and they want to be reconnected. they know we have disagreements. i think they're happy to see the president of the united states recognizing their own president. >> i'm sure they are. all right. thank you very much, jim schitto reporting. history was made, but what's next. joining us from the brookings institution in washington and our senior political analyst and former presidential adviser, david gergen, and chief political correspondent, anchor of "state of the union," candy crowley. candy histor candy, historic day for u.s./iranian relations. how this will be perceived in washington and beyond? >> certainly i can tell you that in washington you will hear grave doubts about whether this is a man trying to fool president obama. you are already hearing because

as you know we're in the midst after a big budget showdown here, the government may be shutting down on tuesday. so from republicans, we're hearing a lot of, well, gee, he'll negotiate with the president of iran, but he won't negotiate with the republicans. that was sort of the immediate reaction. there's a great deal of caution. certainly you don't want to tamp on the hope, but there are folks saying let's see what happens next. >> david, you worked in the us when for, what, four presidents. there were obviously not good relations with at least three presidents. nixon, i think, still had decent relations when he was president of the united states. what's your take on this apparent fau occurring now? >> essentially there's a sense that this was almost like the thaw we saw way back when in the cold war when two bitter enemies began talking to each other. a president of the united states could actually make a speech and be broadcast to the russian peop people. it was celebrated by the russian

people. there's no question, as candy says, that -- in the political circles in washington, there's going to be extreme skepticism about this. and there's -- the president's going to be under heavy pressure not to drop any sanctions before he's got a hard deal. whereas the iranians are going to be pushing hard. you've got to make the first move, mr. president. you've got to drop the sanctions first. he's going to be caught in the cross hairs on that. i think if you look at the country as a whole, the u.s. public as skeptd cal ical as th, as much as they hate the iranians for what happened when americans were taken hostage, just as in the cold war i think people would like to see this resolved peacefully. certainly the alternatives are not good. >> ever since that revolution in the late '70s, '79 when american diplomats were held hostage, as you remember, for 444 days, the iranians have -- iranian regime has called the u.s. the evil empire, if you will. how does what happened in '79

play to today's decision for this conversation to go forward ? >> i'm not sure if you're directing that to me -- >> to david,th. >> i think the memories of '79, for people who lived through that, are fresh. jimmy carter lost his -- the white house over this issue in part. but the films made recently have renewed people's understanding of what happened and the drama of it all. and so i don't think it's gone away. and ahmadinejad was so crazy and so crazed and, you know, promised the destruction of israel. there are a lot of jews in this country who will not forget at all. they are extremely skeptical of this. >> i'm sure the israeli government, netanyahu, will be coming here next week. he's skeptical, as well. make, you say this conversation is exciting, but you remain, what, cautiously pessimistic, your words. what do you mean by that? >> well, i mean if you look at the last 30 years of relations,

whenever we had moments of excitement like this, it's never panned out in the end. this is a little bit different in that clearly something is going on in tehran. clearly there's a downstairs to negotiate with us. and so we would be -- woe would be remiss if we didn't try to test it and see where it goes. i'm concerned about the -- i'm concerned about the enthusiasm. i saw something like this when i was in the white house in 2006. i'm asking myself, is this a replay of it. the nuclear file was going from the iaea up to the security council and the iranians wanted to stop it. we got thousands of messages, that's an exaggeration, we got tens of messages from all these different interlocketters around the world, the kurds, iraqis, europeans, telling us that unbelievable things were possible if we would just negotiate with the iranians. we finally put together a proposal, and we said "we'll suspend if you suspend. we'll suspend the effort to take it to the security council if you suspend the enrichment and

reprocessing." the minute we asked for something tangible from them, the statements that something wonderful could happen, they disappeared immediately. so i want the president to take this very, very slowly, very, very carefully. and as david said, not to accept -- not to make any concessions until we have a total package deal. the iranians are going to look it turn this into a phased process whereby we'll lift sanctions before they give us anything. i think that would be a big mace take. >> candy, the prime minister of israel, benjamin netanyahu, is going to be meeting with president obama at the white house on monday. netanyahu addresses the u.n. general assembly on tuesday. i imagine the phone conversation, indeed the context between the u.s. and iran, will be front and center during those meetings. >> it's hard to imagine they'd talk about much else. but obviously the peace talks are going to be up there, as well. this -- even when there was just talk about a little handshake between iran and -- the iranian president and president obama,

israel, the prime minister's office, put out a statement, said don't trust this guy. here's how he's acted in the past. we all know this -- it's too late. and we also know that there is a difference of opinion between israel and the u.s. about how far iran is along the road -- the road to acquiring nuclear weapons. so i imagine it will be a lively conversation. this is not somebody they trust. there's some serendipity going on here. and israel obviously has to be a major part of at least bringing in on the conversation for president obama. but you have really a population many of whom have read about the hostage crisis in schoolbooks, history to them. we have a new president in iran. we have a president in the u.s. that basically ran on talking to one's adversaries, that that's how you got someplace. you have an iran that really needs economic health, and you have in the u.s. a country that's so tired of

confrontation, be it iraq or afghanistan. so there's a lot going on here that i think gives people the hope that david is talking about. but then there are other voices that you hear that this does not comport with some things that we've seen from iran in the past. and in fact there's been no change in policy in iran yet. so it's hard to get overly excited about it. >> yeah. mike, going forward, though, if the iranians are serious about stopping their nuclear program, how do you make sure that they are taking what president obama says transparent and verifiable actions? >> well, that's the $64,000 question. we're -- what's going to happen here is we're going to get to very detailed negotiations very quickly. and the iranians are going to want to get as close as possible to a breakout capacity as -- as they can. and our experts and the israeli experts are going to be saying

they're too close, the iranians are going to be saying that they're very far away, and it's verifiable. we've got cameras in the facilities, watching the centrifuges. we're monitoring all of the -- all of the enriched material. and it -- if our experts and the israeli expert think that what the iranians are demanding is too close to a breakout potential, that they're just a turn of a key away from a bomb, with all this enthusiasm, it's going to be very difficult for the president to break away and say, you know what, i'm turning my back on that deal. that's what i'm worried about. i'm worried about accepting a bad deal. >> thank you very much. david, stay with us. we've got more to discuss. candy crowley and david, they're going to stay with us. we have more to discuss just ahead. president obama's blunt message for house republicans, the ball is back in their court tonight. are they bluffing, or will they really let the government grind to a halt? also ahead, there's breaking news on syria we're monitoring. the united nations security council is meeting right now to

discuss their proposed resolution requiring syria to destroy its chemical weapons. there could be a vote tonight. we went out and asked people a simple question:

how old is the oldest person you've known? we gave people a sticker and had them show us. we learned a lot of us have known someone who's lived well into their 90s. and that's a great thing. but even though we're living longer, one thing that hasn't changed much is the official retirement age. ♪ the question is how do you make sure you have the money you need to enjoy all of these years. ♪

help the gulf when we made recover and learn the gulf, bp from what happened so we could be a better, safer energy company. i can tell you - safety is at the heart of everything we do. we've added cutting-edge technology, like a new deepwater well cap and a state-of-the-art monitoring center, where experts watch over all drilling activity twenty-four-seven. and we're sharing what we've learned, so we can all produce energy more safely. our commitment has never been stronger. everybody has different ideas, goals, appetite for risk. you can't say 'one size fits all'. it doesn't. that's crazy. we're all totally different. ishares core. etf building blocks for your personalized portfolio. find out why 9 out of 10 large professional investors choose ishares for their etfs. ishares by blackrock. call 1-800-ishares for a prospectus, which includes investment objectives, risks, charges and expenses.

read and consider it carefully before investing. risk includes possible loss of principal. a unanimously resolution. >> reporter: before the security council, all 15 members of the security council voting in favor of a resolution co-sponsored by the u.s. and russia. that will require syria to destroy eventually its entire chemical weapons stockpile, and

to become a member of the chemical weapons convention. you see ban ki-moon, u.n. secretary general there, speaking. john kerry, the secretary of state. he will be speaking. we'll have much more coming up. one again, unanimously approved 15-0. all members of the security council including the five permanent members have approved a resolution and a plan for syria eventually to not only identify and allow inspection of but eventually destroy its chemical weapons. stand by. we'll go to nick paton walsh shortly. there's another big story we're following now. it's as raw as raw politics gets. three days and a few hours, that's all that stands between passing a spending bill or a government shutdown. with time running out, president obama today called on house republicans to stop grandstanding and get to work. >> house republicans are so concerned with appeasing the tea party that they've threatened a government shutdown or worse unless i gut or repeal the

affordable care act. i said this yesterday, let me repeat it -- that's not going to happen. i realize that a lot of what's teg pla taking place is political grandstanding, but this grandstanding has real effects on real people. if the government shuts down on tuesday, military personnel, including those risking their lives overseas for us right now, will not get paid on time. federal loan for rural community, small business owners, families buying a home will be frozen. so any republican in congress who's currently watching, i encourage you to think about who you're hurting. >> earlier today the senate passed a spending bill stripped of a republican-backed provision to block money for president obama's health care law. that vote sent the bill back to the house with the clock ticking. midnight monday is the deadline. here's where things stand. house speaker john boehner has said the house won't send a bill back to the senate without amendments.

and senate majority leader harry reid says the senate won't accept anything but what's described as a clean bill. david gergen and candy crowley are still with us. our chief congressional correspondent, dana bash, joins us from capitol hill. we had thought the house might accept the senate funding bill, averting a shutdown of the government and move their fight with the president over to raising the debt ceiling in a few weeks. but that's not necessarily the case right now. what's the latest? >> just as -- as happens so many times in the past weeks and months and, frankly, even years, house republican leaders tried to kind of manage their rest of caucus and were unsuccessful at doing it. their home a couple of days ago was to say, you know, don't fight on this one, guys, let's fight on the next one, which is just around the corner, the debt ceiling. they said no. in part, i'm told, because they were being egged on by senator ted cruz, saying you've got to fight on this government spending bill. what's going on now is john boehner is effectively trying to

negotiate within his own caucus, trying to figure out what the sweet spot is for them to be able to vote and accept a spending bill that has some attachments. i'll told it's not going to be plain. it's not going to happen. probably will have some things dealing with bicycobama care, m delaying it a year, repealing the bicycle tax, getting rid of what sarah palin lovingly called the death panels. not -- we're not sure what it's going to be, but they'll meet tomorrow to try to finalize it. >> candy, you would think in a situation like this, so close to a government shutdown, there will be back channel negotiations going on between the white house and the speaker, other so-called adult would be involved to make sure there isn't a government shutdown. what are you hearing? >> that nothing is going on behind the scenes in terms of, okay, here's plan d. if the whole thing explodes and it's -- the clock is about to strike midnight, here's what we're going to do. i hear nothing about cross-party

negotiations to vaeravert this. i will say i have seen in the past that congress will pass a one-day c.r. or two-day c.r., that kind of thing. so that's still possible. but at the moment, there does not seem to be any kind of "hares our pl "here's our plan that we go to when all else fails." >> david, in the old days, ronald reagan and tip o'neill would get together and fight and fight but make a deal. do you see the president and the speaker now doing anything along those lines? >> not quite yet, wolf. i think they will before it's over. for starters, wolf, isn't it interesting -- the illustration of how upside down the world has become. that a president at the podium today was speaking so warmly of our enemies like iran and -- past days about russia. and speaking so harshly about people across the aisle in his own country. that's really where the politics

has come to. it's very unfortunate. i think what candy is saying, what dana's saying, is we're likely to have a shutdown early next week. maybe a brief postponement. but i must say from my perspective that a shutdown may be a good thing. that it could be shock therapy when we need it. because the real issue is not o the shutdown, the real issue is whether we can get things resolved before the debt ceiling. i think if we have shock flathey that wall street will come in before the resolution there will be real pressure if we have a debt ceiling breach. and there's going to be a lot of pressure from back home. and at this point, i think that maybe john boehner and the president, president taking the lead, i think he has the opportunity to negotiate as he said he's willing to over the shutdown questions, fiscal issues relateding to shutdown. i think that negotiation's possible. >> they've got to do something in order to, a, avert the shutdown, but as you're right -- candy, it's a potential u.s. bailing out of its financial obligations, raising the

creditworthiness of the dollar and the u.s. economy if you will. the ramifications of that are even much more enormous. >> so we are told by economists as well as by the white house. and i think in some ways the president despate hite saying i not going to negotiate over the debt ceiling, this is money already spent, there are no negotiations, just raise the debt ceiling so the u.s. can continue to borrow money. but then they go on, white house officials go on to delineate all the horrible things that would happen. and it would derail the economy and would upset the world, you know, other world economies, et cetera, et cetera. so it is hard to believe that having raised those stakes so high that the president would say, well, you know, i'm still not going to daley with them. i think -- to deal with them. i think there's more a possibility for negotiations there because i think everybody agrees they don't really want to know what would happen if the debt ceiling was not raised. >> so dana, what happens this weekend, monday, leading to that

midnight deadline monday night? >> well, what happens tomorrow is the house will come in, republicans will meet at noon to try to figure out and finalize what their game plan is on their spending bill, what they're going to add to it. unclear if they're going to vote tomorrow, meaning saturday, or sunday. the senate is gone. they're not planning on coming in until monday. they might come in earlier if they have to. they're not coming until monday which is just hours before the -- the shutdown deadline. it is possible, very possible as candy pointed out that if they are down to the wire, they could pass a one, two-day, even week-long stopgap measure. there doesn't seem an appetite right now do it. we'll see what happens when the clock strikes midnight. one other quick point i want to make about the debt ceiling which is much more important economically perhaps, but when it comes to those core conservatives in the house, that is the issue that they really care most about flphilosophical. many were elected on the prop toys do away or chip away at the nation's debt.

for them to vote in any way to raise the debt ceiling, meaning allowing the government to borrow more money from their per s perspective is anathema. that's why it is harder to convince them. they are small maybe, but incredibly powerful, as we have seen so many times over the past weeks. >> what a potential nightmare unfolding here in washington. dana bash, kand crcandy crowley gerg gergen, thank you very much. coming up, breaking news. a crucial vote in the united nations security council approving a resolution just minutes ago requiring syria to destroy all of its chemical weapons. more details. we're going live to the u.n. stand by. plus, who's policing the houston police? she was raped in her own home. she claims the responding officers stayed for only about ten minutes and collected absolutely no evidence. the police chief fired him, but he got his job back. our special report, that's coming up, as well. new fast acting advil.odug with an ultra-thin coating and fast absorbing advil ion core™ technology,

it stops pain before it gets worse. nothing works faster. new fast acting advil. look for it in the white box. new fast acting advil. make my mark i wawith pride.ork. create moments of value. build character through quality. and earn the right to be called a classic. the lands' end no iron dress shirt. starting at 49 dollars. ♪

[ male announcer ] 1.21 gigawatts. today, that's easy. ge is revolutionizing power. supercharging turbines with advanced hardware and innovative software. using data predictively to help power entire cities. so the turbines of today... will power us all... into the future. ♪

breaking news. >> reporter: the city council voted unanimously 15-0 to approve the resolution requiring sear to see relinquish control of its chemical weapons stockpile. nick paton walsh is joining us from the u.n. now. 15 votes in favor, unanimous vote on this resolution. so how did it go down, what happens now? >> reporter: now we are hearing from the u.s. secretary of state, john kerry. the unanimous decision, i think mostly expected after the moscow and washington appeared to have gotten rid of the roadblocks. we heard from ban ki-moon, secretary general, saying the peace process will continue in mid-november. that's backed up by the russians

who said they expect the syrians to keep their end of the bargain and allow fair access to inspectors. the point, though, this resolution doesn't authorize military force if syria's said to be in violation and does leave the issue of exactly how you would decide if syria was in violation a little bit fuzzy, wolf. >> it only speaks of consequences. it doesn't necessarily authorize military force, right? >> reporter: absolutely. that's not in the trigger at all. it does say that future deliberations on whether syria's violated or not should occur under the chapter 7 part of u.n. charter which could permit military force, but it's specifically not in there which, of course is, why it's gone through so smoothly, wolf. >> we'll see if syria complies. thank you very much. let's get caught occupy other stories we're watching now. gary tuchman joins us with a "3 0" bulletin. gary. hello, in florida the family of marlin brown, killed after he was run over by a police car, requested that state officials conduct an independent investigation. that's according to our affiliate, wctv.

the death was ruled an accident and the officer who drove the car was not charged. a kenyan intelligence official says the terrorists who carried out the nairobi mall attack or their associates rented a small store inside the building for about a year. that's likely how they got their weapons into the mall without notice. at least 67 people were killed in the attack, and the mall left in ruins. a new jersey judge has ruled same-sex couples must be allowed to marry in the state starting on october 21st. that date could be delayed on appeal by the governor's office. the judge said legal civil unions in the state are preventing gay couples from getting federal benefits. we hugeance are responsible for at least half -- humans are responsible for at least half the climate change in the last half century. that's according to scientists in a new united nations report. they say driving our cars, deforestation, and other activities are linked to global warming. wolf, back to you. >> gary, thank you very much. up next, why houston police officers who are removed from the force due to misconduct are back on the job most often

reinstated against the wishes of the police chief. also ahead, this one's a head-scratcher. a wheelchair-bound athlete is told by paralympics officials that she's not disabled enough to compete. my interview with victoria alann, coming up, as well. ♪ ♪

so you can get out of your element. so you can explore a new frontier and a different discipline. get two times the points on travel and dining at restaurants from chase sapphire preferred. so you can be inspired by great food once again. chase sapphire preferred. so you can.

help the gulf when we made recover and learn the gulf, bp from what happened so we could be a better, safer energy company. i can tell you - safety is at the heart of everything we do. we've added cutting-edge technology, like a new deepwater well cap and a state-of-the-art monitoring center, where experts watch over all drilling activity twenty-four-seven. and we're sharing what we've learned, so we can all produce energy more safely. our commitment has never been stronger.

crime and punishment tonight. do the police sometimes need

policing? that's a question many in houston, texas, are now asking. in the series of cases where officers were fired or suspended for misconduct, 2/3 who appealed to an arbitrator got their jobs back. that's the highest rate in the nation. randi kaye tonight look at two such cases. cases where police officers were fired from the job and then managed to get reinstated. >> reporter: sound asleep in the upstairs bedroom, endea paz heard a knock. a strange man wearing a mask came flying through the door. it happened here in june, 2011. the man pounced on her, bound her hands with plastic zip ties, and raped her. all while her 4-year-old daughter lay screaming next to her in bed. when it was over, the man escaped in endera's car, taking with him jewelry, cash, and electronics. help came from her cousin who found and untied her. endera called houston police. officer alan swett responded to

the call. endera says he stayed less than ten minutes, ignoring key evidence in her home. >> his job was to say, you know what, i don't want anyone in the bedroom or wherever this incident happened because there was evidence in there, he didn't -- he didn't even do anything. my whole family arrived to the house, and they were just looking around, stepping on the evidence, and that's evidence that was lost because of his negligence. >> reporter: he never interviewed your cowsin who found you and untied you. he never examined the dresser drawers that the attacker emptied. >> no. >> reporter: he never found the broken window at that attacker came through. the plastic tie that's he used to restrain you -- >> didn't. >> narrator: never examined those. didn't examine the condom wrapper or tissue your attacker used. >> no, he didn't. >> reporter: the officer wrote that no evidence existed at the crime scene. >> in his report he said he sat on the sofa and wrote the report. he never wrote anything while he was in there. >> reporter: there was no sofa. >> there was no so amp that's the funny part.

>> reporter: officer swett was fired for negligence and disregard for a victim. end of story, right? wrong. as is often the case at the houston police department, he appealed, and his case went to arbitration. the houston police union, which represented swett at the appeal, argued his failure to search for and remove evidence does not mont to gross negligence. the arbitrator ruled in favor of officer swett who got his job back, including back pay for the months he was fired. the arbitrator said simply the police chief did not have just cause for indefinite suspension, reducing the penalty to a 90-day suspension. swett's the first one to get his job back either. in fact, 2/3 -- you heard right -- 2/3 of police officers who were fired or suspended get their jobs back or penalties reduced. that is the highest rate in the nation. houston police chief charles mcclelland would not speak with

us on camera, but his spokesperson told us that while the chief doesn't like the fact that an independent arbitrator can overturn his decisions, it is state law." ray hunt is the president of the houston police officers union. >> in our system, we have arbitrators who are outside people who have no dog in the fight. they simply are arbitrators. they may be a college professor. they may be a leader in the community. they listen to the facts, and they make a decision as to whether or not the discipline was fair. >> reporter: what's more important, protecting the police officer or protecting the citizens? >> both. the police officers are here, sworn to protect the citizens. but police officers also have rights, and their rights have to be upheld. >> reporter: what about these officers? they were caught on surveillance video beating an unarmed 15-year-old suspect back in march, 2010. the teenager had been involved in a burglary and was on the ground on his stomach. his hands at his head. chief charles mcclelland fired the officers.

both appealed to an arbitrator and, yes, they got their jobs back. the houston police department isn't exactly known for disciplining officers, but when they do, thear traitors and you fight -- the arbitrators and you fight tooth and nail to overturn that. why is that? >> i would disagree with that, too. our police officers are -- are disciplined every time they violate a policy or a rule. we don't have just slaps on the hand in the houston police department. >> this is randall callinan. >> reporter: this is a houston civil rights attorney. is the system broken in your opinion? >> someone who it will beat in open daylight with all these other officers around and all these witnesses beat a defenseless person who's given up totally should not be on the houston police department. >> reporter: back at inder indera paz's home, growing concern. if things keep going in this direction, who will they count on to protect her community? >> whenever somebody has any problem, they're not going to want to call the police anymore because they're not doing their

jobs. how can we trust them in the future? who can we really trust? >> reporter: randi kaye, cnn, houston. >> in reporting the story, randi tried to talk to the arbitration board and the national association of arbitrators but was unsuccessful. and although houston's police chief refused to speak to us on camera, randi requested an interview with someone else in the department, but no one was made available. joining us to talk a little more about this, mark geragos, criminal defense attorney, and cnn legal analyst. mark, when you hear the details of the rape case that randi just reported on, the negligence, sounds sickening. how is it possible that an officer like it can get his job back? >> you know, what they do and what happened i think in this case is they said, look, he wasn't adequately trained. therefore, you can't blame him. the irony of this is that it opens up the department itself to liabilitywhereas the officer -- nothing basically happens to

him, and the taxpayers are going to end up footing the bill, number one. and number two, the case is going to be irreparably damaged so that you never get any justice for the victims. that's the irony, i guess, and a horrible irony in this case. >> an expert we spoke to for the story, this story believes that a big part of the problem is that the police union has, what, a 50% say in who the arbiters are. what's your take on that? >> well, again, part of the problem is, you know, you're dealing with politicians at almost every level here. and the police union endorsement is vital to anybody who's running for office. you don't see anybody running against the police union. and therefore, they carry an awful big stick in addition to, as you say, the fact that they've got a 50% shot at selecting who's going to be there. >> let me reiterate that it's the houston police chief that's handing down these punishments on his own officers that are then being reversed or reduced.

here's a question -- can a police chief be wrong in 2/3 of these appeals? i mean, how hard is it to discipline a police officer? >> i think it points out precisely the problem. if you want to police the police and the chief himself in 66% or 67% of the cases has himself reversed, he's essentially become neutered. then how do you run a department where you know all you have to do is challenge the chief and two out of three times you're going to win? >> you point out that while houston has the highest rate in the country of reversing or reducing punishments for police officers, it's prevalent in a lot of other cities, as well, including your hometown of l.a. >> yeah. absolutely, in lampt.a., i've g case in utah, the west valley police department. there was a shag, problems with the, that ticks department. they -- a shooting, problems with the department. and they disbanded five of seven

officers. this happens all across the country. it's a real problem. and unless we do something to fundamentally change it at that level, you're going to continue to have cases where there's excessive force or where the investigation is compromised and there's nothing you can do about it, and ultimately like i said before, the taxpayer ends up holding the bag on these things. >> you have any thoughts on how to fix this? >> yeah. i think -- i don't think that this should be a completely unionized situation. i think that at a certain point in cases of excessive force or in cases where there's a competency of the officer involved, that the chief has got to be some more plenary power to implement and run his department. >> mark geragos, thank you very much. >> thank you, wolf. coming up, a young champion paralympic swimmer is told she can't compete because there's not enough proof that the condition that left her legs paralyzed is permanent. i speak with the very brave victoria arlen next. [ whirring ]

if your 9 to 5 is made up of concrete and metal... [ whirring ] ...you need to be confident in your truck. chevy silverado's coverage plan says it all. it's the best pickup coverage in america. with two years of scheduled maintenance. and that's the kind of metal [mettle] that ram and ford just aren't made of. put silverado to the test at the silverado vs. all event. [ male announcer ] now get an introductory lease offer on this silverado double cab for around $319 per month. see your local chevy dealer today. for around $319 per month.

i had pain in my abdomen... it just wouldn't go away.thing. i was spotting, but i had already gone through menopause. these symptoms may be nothing... but they could be early warning signs of a gynecologic cancer, such as cervical, ovarian, or uterine cancer. feeling bloated for no reason. that's what i remember. seeing my doctor probably saved my life. warning signs are not the same for everyone. if you think something's wrong... see your doctor. ask about gynecologic cancer. and get the inside knowledge. when anderson's away, the wolf will play. "the riddiculist" coming up. and hearing everything from our marketing partners, the media and millions iculist" coming up. can be a challenge. that's why we partnered with hp to build the new nascar fan and media engagement center. hp's technology helps us turn millions of tweets, posts and stories into real-time business insights

that help nascar win with our fans. see who does good work and compare costs. it doesn't usually work that way with health care. but with unitedhealthcare, i get information on quality rated doctors, treatment options and estimates for how much i'll pay. that helps me, and my guys, make better decisions. i don't like guesses with my business, and definitely not with our health.

innovations that work for you. that's health in numbers. unitedhealthcare. and struggle to sleep comfortably together, now there's a solution. sleep number dual temp, the revolutionary temperature-balancing layer with active air technology that works on any mattress brand, including yours. whether you sleep hot or cool, sleep number dual temp allows each of you to select your ideal temperature. and it's only at one of our 425 sleep number stores nationwide. sleep number. comfort individualized.

for a young paralympic athlete to hear you're not disabled enough to compete. that's essential what he the international paralympic committee told victoria arlen, a meda medal-winning swimmer who's been through so much. she was in a vegetative state for three years because of an auto immune disorder and woke one paralyzed legs. the committee says it doesn't have enough evidence of a permanent impairment. in arlen's case, something she social security based on the fact that she has a shred of hoped, a shred of hope that she may one day walk again. i spoke with victoria arlen earlier. tell us how you ended up in a wheelchair and unable to walk. >> i developed a rare neurological condition called transfers myelitis. on top of that i got another neurological condition called abam which stands for acute disseminated encephomylitis that affected my spinal cord. >> in august before you were to compete in montreal, the

international olympic economic ruled you were -- committee ruled you were ineligible. how did that feel to be pulled from the meet? >> it was so last minute and unexpected. we had been talking with the ipc and working with the ipc on getting me re-evaluated all year. and they hadn't questioned me until i was already in montreal and -- and ready to compete. so it was heartbreaking, and to be penalized for having hope was really sad. >> sad indeed. the committee said you failed to provide what they called the conclusive evidence of a permanent eligible impairment. based on a doctor's report that you submitted, what did you say to that -- that complaint that they had? >> it was -- well, it was frustrating because we had over 75 pages of medical documents, scans, mris, you name it, we had documenting beyond reasonable doubt. my condition and the severity of it. and my disability. and the fact that they were -- they took one portion of that and twisted it around and used

it against me was -- was really disheartening. >> it must have heartbreaking indeed. >> it made no sense. >> well, just because there's a glimmer, a glimmer of a chance your condition may one day improve, which could be the case for a number of athletes, you're not allowed to compete, is that the explanation they gave? >> that was all the explanation we had. that there might be a chance with medical breakthroughs and with a miracle that i could walk again. and they penalized me for having hope for that. and if i didn't have hope, i wouldn't be here today. and a lot of people with spinal cord injuries, there is hope with all the breakthroughs in technology. it's really frustrating that that was their only reason. >> what's the status of your eligibility right now, and what would you lake to see happen? >> i would just like to have this not happen to any other athletes. and as of right now, it's in the hands of a higher power. and they're this control of it now. and it's out of my hands, and i'm just, you know, moving forward. and there's a lot more going on

in this world. so i refuse to be bitter or let this break me. i've been through too much to let this bring me down. >> you obviously hope someday you might be able it walk again, i assume, right? >> i would love to. you know, that's been a dream of mine since i got in the wheelchair. i'm working hard at that, as well. and you know, that's the top of my list. >> we're hoping the same thing, absolutely. good luck. you're a wonderful woman, victoria. thank you very much for joining us. >> thank you for having me. >> she really is a very impressive young woman. good luck to her. the "ridiculist" is next. [ female announcer ] it's simple physics...

a body at rest tends to stay at rest... while a body in motion tends to stay in motion. staying active can actually ease arthritis symptoms. but if you have arthritis, staying active can be difficult. prescription celebrex can help relieve arthritis pain so your body can stay in motion. because just one 200mg celebrex a day can provide 24 hour relief for many with arthritis pain and inflammation. plus, in clinical studies, celebrex is proven to improve daily physical function so moving is easier. celebrex can be taken with or without food. and it's not a narcotic. you and your doctor should balance the benefits with the risks. all prescription nsaids, like celebrex, ibuprofen, naproxen and meloxicam have the same cardiovascular warning. they all may increase the chance of heart attack or stroke, which can lead to death. this chance increases if you have heart disease

or risk factors such as high blood pressure or when nsaids are taken for long periods. nsaids, like celebrex, increase the chance of serious skin or allergic reactions, or stomach and intestine problems, such as bleeding and ulcers, which can occur without warning and may cause death. patients also taking aspirin and the elderly are at increased risk for stomach bleeding and ulcers. don't take celebrex if you have bleeding in the stomach or intestine, or had an asthma attack, hives, other allergies to aspirin, nsaids or sulfonamides. get help right away if you have swelling of the face or throat, or trouble breathing. tell your doctor your medical history. and find an arthritis treatment for you. visit celebrex.com and ask your doctor about celebrex. for a body in motion.

time for the "ridiculist" or as i call it, when anderson's called it, the "reblitzulist." we draw your attention it a band called man-man from their record on ony pond. as anderson discovered the song was inspired by none other than yours truly. i've received many honors, but perhaps none as satisfying as being the inspiration for an indy rock song. let's listen to some of it. it's called "end boss." ♪

>> "evil gets what evil wants." i will have that crossstitched on a pillow in my bedroom. i wonder how they knew. that as the front man says, i'm quoting, "just picturing wolf's calm face, eyes, gray beard shooting pool in a barrio bar with a baby dancing in his belly and drinking lemon flavored vodka, still gets to me." i've suspected that duran duran's "hungry like the wolf" was about me, as well, just never got confirmation. there's no question about the man-man song because the frontman even wears a tunic emblazoned with multiple wolf blitzer heads. even though i was the subject of the song which i believe by definition makes it more of a

"situation room" story than an "anderson cooper 360" story, anderson ran with it. >> i know three things -- one, if i was in charlotte, north carolina, tonight, i would be going to the chop shop to see man-man on tour. two, i would steal that tunic during soundcheck. three, we finally have an answer to a question that a young balloon boy posed many, many years ago as he awaited his interview with wolf blitzer. >> say hi to wolf. wolf dish. >> hi. >> hi, guys. >> who the shall wolf? >> i'll tell you who the hell wolf is. he is an enigma. he is a muse, and forever in song as a vodka-swilling baby eater, he shall be remembered. >> all right h, i know a few things. one, if i was in tucson tonight, i'd go to the man-man concert at club congress and bet i'd get in for free. two, i know a band called cryptic murmurs once wrote a song about you. maybe you're jealous because my song kind of kicks your song's butt.

♪ >> not a bad punk song. but talk to me when someone wears a tunic adorned with anderson cooper faces. until then, i'll consider myself the reigning rock god of the "ridiculist." that does it for this edition of "360." thanks for watching. "piers morgan live" starts right now. tonight, william jefferson clinton, the 42nd president of the united states, the man who knows america's politics better than just about anybody else. nothing is off the table. i asked him the hillary question -- who do you think might make the better president, your wife or your daughter? [ laughter ] >> what do you think about ted cruz talking and talking and talking? most of the party thinks he's crackers -- >> once in a while i'm extremely grateful for your british roots. i couldn't have said that with a straight face and pulled it off. that was great.