anything anymore. you won them both. i tried. i tried. >> we here at "state of the union" are rooting for a good game. thank you so much for watching. i'm candy crowley in washington. head to cnn.com/sotu for analysis and extras. if you missed any part of today's show find us on itunes. "fareed zakaria gps" starts now. >> this is "gps," the global public square. welcome to all of you in the united states and around the world. i'm fareed zakaria. the start of the sochi olympics is almost upon us and we don't know who will get the gold, but we do know that geopolitics could complicate the games. i asked henry kissinger to help us understand the violence next door in ukraine and whether russia might actually do something to stop it. i also talked to valery gergiev, russia's greatest conductor.

♪ >> and a close friend of vladimir putin about the games and about global concerns about russia's record on gay rights. ♪ but we will start where president obama left off in the state of the union. inequality in america, just how bad it is and is it fixable? i have a great panel to tackle all that plus janet yellin's first day on the job. also, we're always talking these days about how we should learn from china, but china just took a page from new york. i'll explain. finally, football versus football. who wins the tale of the tape? first here's my take. after iran and the major powers signed op to a deal on tehran's nuclear program expectations were high. over the last week, they have fallen sharply as iranian officials have made tough public comments, israel's prime minister has reaffirmed his opposition to almost any

conceivable deal, and several influential u.s. senators have threatened new sanctions. now this does not mean a final deal with tehran is impossible, but it does mean that both sides, tehran and the west, need to start thinking creatively about how to bridge what is clearly a wide divide and they also have to think about how to get around the main obstacle they will face which will be opposition at home in iran and the united states. the iranian statements that have attracted attention came from the foreign minister and president. the former explained to cnn's jim shootto that contrary what washington claimed iran did not agree to dismantle anything. later in an interview with me also on cnn president rowhani explained iran would not destroy any existing centrifuges. it's clear iran and america have different views about what an acceptable final deal would look like. on the basis of my interview with rowhani and talks with other iranian officials my sense

is as follows. iran will provide the world with assurances and evidence its nuclear program is civilian, not military. this means the country would allow unprecedented levels of intrusive inspections at all facilities. this process has already begun with inspections of iran's mines for the first time in a decade. iran's officials are determined not to accept any constraints on their program beyond that. they speak often about the importance of being treated like any other country that has signed the nuclear nonproliferation treaty, which means to them, they have the unfettered right to enrich uranium to produce electricity. now the american vision of the final deal is quite different. it stems from the notion that iran must take special steps to provide confidence that its program is peaceful so america would allow iran to enrich some small, symbolic amount of uranium which means it becomes time consuming to convert to weapons grade levels.

iran would dismantle centrifuges and shut down its heavy water reactor. washington basically wants to lengthen the lead time between a civilian program and what could become a military one. both sides will have to think hard about what they really care about. irans officials will have to come to terms with the fact that iran is being treated differently and for good reasons. iran has a program that is suspicious a massive investment to produce a tiny amount of electricity, and the country has deceived the world about its program in the past. washington will have to realize that while it will get more concessions than it thought possible on inspections, it will get fewer on the rollback of iran's existing program. i've come away from meetings with rowhani convinced that they are moderates who see greater integration of iran with the world. rowhani hinted to me, for example, that in the next few months, the leaders of the green movement in iran would be released. but i'm also sure that rowhani

and others are operating under constraints with many domestic opponents. the same could be said of the obama administration. it's better that both sides start preparing the ground at home for a final deal and the compromises it would involve, rather than hoping somehow that if they work things out in geneva, it's all going to work out in the end. for more go to cnn.com/fareed and read my "washington post" column this week. let's get started. ♪ >> average wages have barely budged and inequality has deepened. upward mobility has stalled. >> that's how president obama laid out the problem tuesday night in his state of the union address. he's right, but does he have solutions to the problem? i have a great panel to talk about all that and janet yellin

at the fed, zanny minton beddoes economic editor of the economist, steve ratter in was the obama administration's car czar, currently the chairman of willett advisors and investment firm. chrystia freeland is a member of the canadian parliament, former journalist and author "the rise of the new global super rich and the fall of everyone else" and ken rogoff the former chief economist of the imf, now professor of public policy and economics at harvard university. so steve, first the problem. you know, there are now the studies that say that social mobility has actually not fallen over the last 20 years, but the basic picture that obama painted, seems pretty accurate. >> yeah. so let's just be absolutely accurate. so economic inequality has gotten a lot worse. there's no disagreement about that, no confusion, it's as bad as it has ever been. economic mobility moving from the bottom toward the top, in

the u.s., there was a study that came out at harvard by a serious economist, doesn't seem to have gotten worse, but that said, economic mobility in the u.s. is worse than it is in many parts of europe, particularly parts of scandinavia. >> the question becomes, what do you do about it? >> i think one interesting thing to point out, the nature of the inequality is a huge rise in income concentration at the very top. it's not so much the rungs of the ladder have gotten wider all the way down. they have. very rich people has just exploded and where it was 100 years. that's the kind of backdrop of the inequality. the interesting thing about mobility is that is something that both agree on. some people don't think inequality matters. it does matter. the american dream, the idea that if you work hard you can make it is very engrained in this country's psyche and that's where there's hope for solutions, politically, to have both sides come together. what could they be? i would pick two. one i think the most important

is education. preschool is the really, really big one. another is something that i am quite focused on, which is the earned income tax credit helping people at the bottom, not necessarily -- >> explain this in 15 seconds. >> i will explain what it is. top ups the earnings of low-skilled workers so they make more money for working. it's different than the minimum wage. the minimum wage forces empl employers to pay more. the earned income tax credit tops your earnings. the biggest one is education. preschool is the front. 100 years ago it was secondary schools. in the middle of the 20th century the gi bill. the u.s. was at the frontier of education. it's fallen behind on preschool. i think that's a big one to push. >> we're way behind on preschool. >> completely agree with that. i would say education at all levels, including adult education, trying to use new methods. the average american is going to be changing jobs seven times and they need a vehicle for public education, for learning. they don't have it.

also say at the top end we have a system that exacerbates this and doesn't ameliorate it, our tax system. it's ridiculous. the very top end because of the way we have capital gains and the way people are allowed to call things that are really earned income capital gains, the very, very top level are paying much lower average taxes than just below them. >> chrystia, you wrote a book about this "the super rich" this concentration of wealth. you know, the part of the question that i think a lot of people have is, how does that relate to what is really the biggest problem, which is the stagnation of wages for the vast majority in the middle? you think about the inequality as these three things, the rise of the super rich, the very poor, which is growing and unfortunately getting calcified, but for most people in the west, the feeling is, you have reasonable skills, not great ones, and you just can't make much headway in terms of rising wages. how do you address that problem? >> well, you know, that

connection between the stagnant middle class and the super -- the rise of the super rich, i think is an important one and i thought actually the president handled it really well this time. i thought -- i was very struck by the way he sort of shift the focus from rising income inequality to a hollowed out middle class. this wasn't an eat the rich speech. he was really focusing on, as zanny said, he was focusing on what are the things that we can all agree are wrong and i do think in a time of rising income inequality, stagnant social mobility becomes more of a problem. you can have maybe a social consensus around the idea that high income inequality is okay, as long as you have a system where people feel everybody has access to that and that's not happening right now. >> so if zanny is right, earned income tax credit is crucial. none of this can happen by presidential decree. he needs congress. >> so a couple points on this. first, i think we all kind of

agree on what solutions are. i'm not quite as optimistic as zanny about the idea that even if we all agree on social meeblts we would then all agree on what the solutions are. i think i would say what chrystia said slightly differently in that i think the income inequality would be more tolerable if wages were going up for everybody else but they're not. getting back to your question that's really the important point, that nothing is happening in washington. there's total gridlock. congress isn't doing anything. everything that we've all mentioned as solutions would cost money and republicans do not want to spend money. the democrats want to raise taxes. the republicans aren't going to do that. so that's why you saw the president come out with these very small proposals the minimum wage for federal contractors is a trivial proposal but he could do it. >> a big part of the inequality problem we see in advanced countries but around the world the nature of technology change has been benefiting firms relative to workers. when i was a graduate student you were taught labor got two-thirds of income, it didn't

matter what was going on, it just worked out that way as long as the economy was growing it was fine. and that has really stopped. all over the world the last 25 years. we need to take a break but when we get back in one moment, janet yellin started her new job, one of the most important jobs in the world. what will she do there? welcome back. how is everything? there's nothing like being your own boss! and my customers are really liking your flat rate shipping. fedex one rate. really makes my life easier. maybe a promotion is in order. good news. i got a new title. and a raise? management couldn't make that happen. [ male announcer ] introducing fedex one rate. simple, flat rate shipping with the reliability of fedex.

♪ [ male announcer ] bob's heart attack didn't come with a warning. today his doctor has him on a bayer aspirin regimen to help reduce the risk of another one. if you've had a heart attack, be sure to talk to your doctor before you begin an aspirin regimen. when electricity is generated with natural gas instead of today's most used source, how much are co2 emissions reduced? up to 30%? 45%? 60%? the answer is... up to 60% less. and that's a big reason why the u.s. is a world leader in reducing co2 emissions. take the energy quiz. energy lives here. ♪

spending the day with my niece. i don't use super poligrip for hold because my dentures fit well. before those little pieces would get in between my dentures and my gum and it was uncomfortable.

even well-fitting dentures let in food particles. super poligrip is zinc free. with just a few dabs, it's clinically proven to seal out more food particles so you're more comfortable and confident while you eat. so it's not about keeping my dentures in, it's about keeping the food particles out. [ charlie ] try zinc free super poligrip.

and we are back with zanny minton beddoes, steve ratner, chrystia freeland and ken rogoff talking everything economic. steve you wanted to pick up on something ken talked about which is technology has been disempowering workers and favoring companies, but you wanted to add to that globalization. >> look at it through a slightly different lens. we can call it technological change but what i saw when i got into the auto work, i was not a manufacturing guy, is essentially the fact that companies can now source their labor anywhere in the world they want to, many countries, mexico, southeast asia, not just china, are efficient in the terms of the productive capacity of the workers -- >> give the example of gm and the mexico -- >> so when i was working on the auto thing, gm was paying about $55 an hour total costs for its workers. mexico paying $7 an hour. mexican workers were just as productive as the u.s. ones. if you go back to 2006 and

today, auto production in the u.s. is about the same, went down, came back up again, and mexico today it's 50% higher than it was in the u.s. and you know where most of those cars are coming, they're coming here. so part of why ken is completely right about his point workers have not gotten their share of total income is because companies can source their labor anywhere in the world they want to. >> one of the president's proposals is to raise the minimum wage. there are a lot of conservative economists who say this is a bad idea. obviously anything you force a higher price on, anything you tax, you're going to get less of, so the very thing you're trying to get lots of entry level jobs in this point in the economy you're going to get less of. ken row gofr, what do you say? >> there's a case for social protection but the national minimum wage can't be too high because we have big differences across the states. i mean that's the problem. the right minimum wage for new york city is very different from mississippi, and i think that's what makes it delicate also.

teenagers, that's been a big part of our work ethic, getting teenagers into the labor force, big contrast with europe. i'm not enthusiastic about having it apply to them. steep, quick rise in the minimum wage right now i don't think is warranted but it's been a while and some changes. >> what do you think? >> you know, i think the minimum wage is where you're right, the textbooks say it is going to hit jobs. the reality from studies, a moderate minimum wage, very little evidence it hits jobs. the u.s. minimum wage, the federal one, is 37% of the median wage, extremely low. i think you can raise it closer to the 50% of the median without hitting jobs too much. i think it's small, but it's helpful. but the way i would do it is undepoliticize it. the u.k. has a low pay commission which changes the minimum wage -- >> on a formula -- >> not a formula but according to criteria, yeah. >> as discussed it's not the best way to help people at the bottom end of the income scale but it's a way for government to do without having to write a

check to anybody the way it would education or earned income tax credit. i think zanny's analysis and ken of course are right. the impact on jobs has been proven to be minimal. it's way below what it's been historically on an inflation adjusted basis and should be raised. >> janet yellin takes over the fed. you have been probably the most outspoken critic of the fed on one issue, you think they should actively encourage the united states to have more inflation. >> yeah. >> explain why and whether she'll do it. >> certainly at the crisis it was a no-brainer they should have worried less about inflation. inflation would have even been a good thing because there's so much public and private debt to make wages smooth out around the world. >> and the basic argument is if you have a little bit of inflation people will spend money because they will worry that if they don't spend it today it will be worth less tomorrow? >> that's absolutely part of it. it also helps debtors relative to creditors. we live in an economy where it's not easy po push workers' wages

down and there needed to be some readjustment. janet yellin has the reputation, very dovish, as someone who cares deeply about unemployment. she's worked on it her whole life. also cares about inflation, but maybe not the same way as the average person. i think that's great. on the other hand she doesn't run the place by herself. i should say she's very good. i mean this is not a question of being dovish and weak. she is dovish and very, very brilliant person. >> zanny, do you think that -- i mean emerging markets have seen a big selloff. do you think that's related to janet yellin coming to the fed, the fed saying they're going to end tapering, feeling of unsteadiness or -- >> i think it's related to the idea that we are close to the beginning of the end of the monetary morphing, if you will. the u.s. is slowing the pace of tapering and kind of uncertainty about how fast that's going to go, particularly when are rates going to rise, the world where capital was going to the emerging markets in yields, yields were so low here, is over

the next couple years going to change. may not change next month, this year, but it is going to change. >> let me ask you one final question because we haven't had you back since you've been a member of parliament. do you feel like watching the president, hearing him talk about politics, you have a new appreciation for the politics of all this as opposed to the economics which you've always been writing about? >> much as i respect the esteemed journalists around this table, becoming a politician, i feel sorry for politicians. it's -- >> it's true. >> it's really, really hard. it is -- it's hard to be a great journalist, of course, but it is easiyer to sit around the table and make clever points about the good and dumb things politicians have done. actually moving the ball is hard. even if you understand like minimum wage is a great example, what we all agreed the empirical evidence now shows as long as you do it reasonably it doesn't kill jobs. so actually it makes sense to raise the minimum wage. the province of ontario where i

live has raised the minimum wage this week. that's the right thing to do. i think the british example is a good one. even if you could have like smart technocrats agree on a poli policy, actually doing it that's hard, right, steve? >> it's hard. >> all right. we've got to close on that. steve ratner, chrystia freeland, ken rogoff, zanny minton beddoes thank you very much. what in the world, how new york city set the tone for a global trend that is quite literally saving the world. i will explain. okay, listen up! i'm re-workin' the menu.

mayo? corn dogs? you are so outta here! aah! [ female announcer ] the complete balanced nutrition of great-tasting ensure. 24 vitamins and minerals, antioxidants, and 9 grams of protein. [ bottle ] ensure®. nutrition in charge™. ♪ yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah! ♪ we are one, under the sun ♪ under the sun... [ female announcer ] fiber and protein. together as one. introducing new fiber one protein cereal. [ all ] bigger! now let's say a friend invites you over and they have a really big, really fun pool. and then another friend invites you over who has a much smaller, less fun pool. which pool would you rather go to? does the big pool have piranhas? i believe so. does it have a dinosaur that can turn into a robot and chop the water like a karate ninja? yeah. wait, what? why would it not? [ male announcer ] it's not complicated. bigger is better. and at&t now covers more than 99% of all americans. ♪

there's nothing like being your own boss! and my customers are really liking your flat rate shipping. fedex one rate. really makes my life easier. maybe a promotion is in order. good news. i got a new title. and a raise? management couldn't make that happen. [ male announcer ] introducing fedex one rate. simple, flat rate shipping with the reliability of fedex. bulldog: you know, not all heroes wear capes.

bulldog: you know, some wear fur. and mattress discounters good deed dogs is here to help them. meet yara. she helps veterans like marv stay independent. this is caspin. he helps wallace with things she can't do on her own. and goldie helps children with developmental disabilities,

while suzie works with people in the hospital. you can be a hero, too. give it mattressdiscountersdogs.com, or any mattress discounters. mattress discounters good deed dogs: helping dogs help people. now for our what in the world segment. i want to talk about the week's most important economic story. >> as president i'm committed to making washington work better. >> it's not obama's state of the union speech. it's not the stock markets. it has nothing to do with the federal reserve. i'm talking about the decision made in beijing this week to ban smoking in schools across china. why is this economic news? consider these numbers. china is said to have 350 million smokers, more than the entire population of the united states. i bring up the american comparison because the surgeon

general released a report last month that caught my eye. the fallouts of tobacco use, the report said, cost americans $289 billion a year. about four times as much as our federal budget for education. 20 million americans have died in the last 50 years as a result of smoking. more than the tally from all of our wars put together. this year, nearly 500,000 americans will die prematurely because of smoking. the numbers are just staggering. i imagin in china the numbers are much, much worse. well, the good news is, things are actually getting better and the ban in china is another big stride forward. according to the world health organization's recent data from 2010, 109 countries have national bans on smoking in hospitals. 42 on smoking in restaurants. 35 on smoking in bars. every year new countries join this list.

india banned smoking in public places in 2008. so did france. meanwhile, there's been a substantial decline in global smoking rates. in 1980, 41% of the men around the world were smokers. by 2012, the number dropped to 31%. at least some of the credit has to go to michael boom berg, the former mayor of new york. remember when he first proposed a smoking ban in new york back in 2002. >> freedom of choice. freedom of choice. >> critics derided the plan as her rosie, europeans thought it was american pure tism at work, no one had pushed through a ban of that magnitude in a major metropolis but within a few years dozens of major cities followed suit including ones in europe where smoking seemed part of the scenery, paris, rome, london, like jordan and now china, are moving in this direction. the benefits in new york were seen immediately. according to the american

journal of public health in 2004, just one year after new york's smoking ban, there were 3,800 fewer hospital admission for hospital attacks. new yorkers saved $56 million on health care costs that year. critics have called bloomberg a nanny, someone who wants to take away free choice from people, but when you consider the health care costs involved, costs born by all of us who don't smoke it seems like common sense. the irony is over time, most people seem to agree even smokers. in 1965, 42% of american adults were tobacco users. today that number has dropped to just 18%. the lesson here is not just about helping people make choices but giving them the right information and options. the next frontier is obesity, another preventable scourge, more than a third of all americans are obese. according to the centers for disease control and prevention, the annual medical costs of obesity in the united states

amounts to $147 billion. how many lives lost and how many dollars spent before we do something to reverse this trend? what one of the smartest ways to help people make informed choices about the thousands of empty calories they often unknowingly consume. that's not a nanny state, but one trying to help you stay alive and healthy and just as happened with smoking, if someone in the united states is bold enough to start something, people might at first say it's weird and cranky and crazy, but who knows a few years later they'll be doing the same thing in paris and even beijing. up next, ahead of the winter olympics in sochi and with the protests in neighboring ukraine, what is russian president vladimir putin thinking? we ask henry kissinger, who has met putin more times than any living american and we asked russia's greatest musician who has known the president for 20 years. right back. at if you wear a par, you're almost twice as likely to lose your supporting teeth? try poligrip for partials. poligrip helps minimize stress

which may damage supporting teeth by stabilizing your partial. care for your partial. help protect your natural teeth. life's an adventure and it always has been. but your erectile dysfunction - it could be a question of blood flow. cialis tadalafil for daily use helps you be ready anytime the moment's right. you can be more confident in your ability to be ready. and the same cialis is the only daily ed tablet approved to treat ed and symptoms of bph, like needing to go frequently or urgently. tell your doctor about all your medical conditions and medications, and ask if your heart is healthy enough for sexual activity. do not take cialis if you take nitrates for chest pain, as this may cause an unsafe drop in blood pressure. do not drink alcohol in excess with cialis. side effects may include headache, upset stomach, delayed backache or muscle ache. to avoid long-term injury, seek immediate medical help for an erection lasting more than 4 hours. if you have any sudden decrease or loss in hearing or vision, or if you have any allergic reactions such as rash, hives, swelling of the lips, tongue or throat, or difficulty breathing or swallowing,

stop taking cialis and get medical help right away. ask your doctor about cialis for daily use and a 30-tablet free trial.

one of chris christie's fellow republicans says the new jersey governor should stay on as head of the republican governors association. earlier on "state of the union" bobby jindal said christie should not step down from his

post because of the bridge scandal engulfing his administration. he is pushing back against claims by one of his former appointees the new jersey governor knew about the bridge lane closures when they happened. at least 15 people are dead after a volcano erupted in the vimmage near jakarta, indonesia. plumes of ash a mile into the sky making it impossible for those too close to the volcano to escape. authorities are allowing some people to return to their home today, but warned the volcano may still be dangerous. iran has received the first part of some $4 billion in oil money that had been frozen by international sanctions. last november iran and five world powers, including the united states, reached an interim deal under which iran agreed to limit its nuclear program in exchange for an easing of sanctions. and we are eight hours away from kickoff of super bowl xlviii. the denver broncos and seattle seahawks are squaring off in the

nfl's biggest game. although this year's super bowl is being played outside in new jersey's metlife stadium, the weather is not expected to cause problems. the game time forecast calls for temperatures in the mid 40s. those are your top stories. "reliable sources" with brian set her is at the top of the hour. now back to "fareed zakaria gps." starting friday, the eyes of the world will be on sochi, a resort town sandwiched between the black sea and the caucasus mountains. these two features will be the geographic backdrop of these games but the geopolitics of the region are moving from background to foreground. there are terror fields centered upon chechnya and dag gas stan, and then there is the revolution next door, just 600 miles away is kiev, the capital of ukraine, a nation of 45 million being rocked by a revolution. ukraine gained its independence when the soviet union collapsed

in 1991, but it is still inextrick kably connected to mother russia. to get a better grasp of what's going on there and what it might mean for the sochi games i wanted to talk to a man who knows the region and its players very well, indeed. henry kissinger was secretary of state under richard nixon. he's now the chairman of kissinger associates which helps corporations do business in countries around the world. henry kissinger, thank you for joining us. >> glad to be here. >> now, we've talked about this and you think that what is going on in ukraine is going to be of particular interest and sensesivety to russia. explain why ukraine is so central to russia and to russian -- russia's sense of its security? >> well, first of all, the russia of today developed from kiev -- >> from kiev the capital of ukraine. >> kiev used to be called kiev

rous so the political and even more moderate development of russia came out of kiev. then they split, but since the beginning of the end of the 17th, beginning of the 18th century, ukraine has been part of russia. and i don't know any russian, whether they're dissidents or pro-government, who does not consider ukraine at least an essential part of russian history. so the russians cannot be indifferent to the future of ukraine. now, i'm strongly in favor of an independent ukraine and strongly in favor of ukraine having an organic relationship to europe, but to understand the russian attitude, one has to look at history. >> now when you look at what is

happening in ukraine, how would you describe it? the way, you know, it appears on television is, you have forces for freedom, democracy, and a relationship, an organic relationship, with the west, battling against a pro-russian president. is that what's essentially happening? >> that is not my impression of -- my impression, it's in essence a divided country. the eastern part is orthodox, russian oriented. the western part, the further west one gets, is a form of catholicism -- >> and western -- >> and pro-west. so i think the opinions are going to be fairly evenly divided. as to the parties fighting each other in ukraine, my impression is, that each of them have democratic elements, each of

them have oligarchic elements, and i don't consider the current president inevitably pro-russian. >> you know putin well. you've met him more than any american. do you think he is watching what is happening in ukraine and thinking, the west and the united states is doing this essentially as a way of surrounding russia? >> i think he thinks that this is a dress rehearsal for what we would like to do in moscow -- >> regime change? >> a regime change issue. and the fact that it's happening so close to the sochi games, will make him even more suspicious. but putin thinks that the

disillusion of the soviet union was a great historical disaster. so obviously the largest part of this independence is ukraine with 50 million people, and he can't be indifferent. >> do you think the obama administration is handling this appropriately? >> well, the obama administration has a tendency to keep making public statements on evolving, dramatic events, as if it's going to be settled on a sunday talk show. i don't disagree with where the administration is heading, but i think it's not necessary to do it so publicly and one should have a better view historic evo. >> basic concern is that this will cause deep russian resentment which will make it difficult for us to find

cooperation with them when syria or iran -- >> relating russia to the rest of the world and to us is a huge challenge because here is a country that has been an imperial country for all of its history, that has identified itself to itself as by its imperial achievements. now they have a deal with china which is a strategic nightmare. a frontier with islam which is a nightmare. a frontier with europe that's historically very shaky. on the other hand, russian rulers throughout history have governed by giving the impression that they're very important abroad, so how do he rally his country while looking abroad and yet adjustments are

necessarily. the challenge that putin faces an it's not in our interests to drive them into a beleaguered attitude where they feel they have to prove what they can do. >> henry kissinger, pleasure to have you on. up next, one of the big controversies about sochi related to russia's treatment of gays and a new law criminalizing homosexuality. i asked russia's most famous conductor and a close friend of vladimir putin whether he approves of what his countryman and his president are doing.

you know how painful heartburn can be. for fast, long lasting relief, use doctor recommended gaviscon®. only gaviscon® forms a protective barrier that helps block stomach acid from splashing up- relieving the pain quickly. try fast, long lasting gaviscon®. [ male announcer ] what kind of energy is so abundant, it can help provide the power for all this? natural gas. ♪ more than ever before, america's electricity is generated by it. exxonmobil uses advanced visualization and drilling technologies to produce natural gas... powering our lives... while reducing emissions by up to 60%. energy lives here. ♪ bulldog: oh boy!

bulldog: mattress discounters presidents day sale! what's this? a queen-size sealy gel memory foam mattress for just $497? mattress discounters has the largest selection of memory foam mattresses under one roof! comforpedic, icomfort, optimum... and wow! four years interest-free financing on the entire tempur-pedic cloud collection. [yawns] don't miss the presidents day sale. ♪ mattress discounters

♪ valery gergiev is one of russia's best known celebrity, the artistic director of st. petersbu petersburg's theater, his skills and passion as a conductor have led to great renowned around the world. he's also an official russian

ambassador to the sochi olympics and a friend of russia's president vladimir putin. he has a unique perspective on russia today, on concerns about crackdowns, on anti-gay legislation, and much more. i caught up with him last week in davos. valery gergiev, pleasure to have you on the show. >> thank you. pleasure to be a guest. >> the sochi olympics have raised as a controversy an issue that you have also gotten embroiled in, which is this issue of gays and gay rights. what do you think of the law that was passed in russia that internationally is read as being extremely hostile to gays? >> i think it was seen internationally as a bad thing happening in russia. i think in russia, the view was different. the way people read this law is slightly different or sometimes very different. first of all, i myself hate any

form of discrimination and as head of an institution, a big institution, more than 3,000 people working for the theater, i would never allow any sort of discrimination to take place, but in russia, i think it's a very controversial issue. now because of olympics coming very soon, everyone thinks of safety, so i'm sure it's not issue number one or number two or number three. safety. and very successful scenario for the games. not one sports man or anyone coming will be upset with it. i can't imagine anyone in russia wants to upset during the olympics or after, of course, not before. i myself question very much why the country needed something like this law and i didn't even read it, honestly i didn't have time, i only learned about this law when things started to happen that i heard about, people being against this

happening in russia. >> you made reference to safety and, of course, president putin also made a reference which suggested what he said was, i have nothing against gays, but there is an issue that concerns me about pedophilia. now, what has outraged many people, i think understandably, is the connection that is being drawn between gays and people who are pedophiles. why would president putin or why would you single out gays as being particularly likely to do it? >> no, nothing in my view, there is no connection at all, in my view. i didn't hear all the discussion president putin had with i think a group of five or six journalists, but i hadn't had much time to hear and they spent time talking about the issue, i didn't hear -- i don't think there is a direct line. >> a lot of people have criticized your relationship

with vladimir putin. they see putin as a strong man, as somebody who has not been good for human rights, and they view you as an artist, as somebody who should stand up for human rights and yet, they see you being very close to president putin. what is your response? >> first of all, i think a lot of people are wrong about president putin. that's my view. i myself am a student so i saw many people, met many heads of state, i look at their policies or their actions better to say, especially on culture. many of them are totally uninterested. i think president putin belongs to a very small group of world leaders, very small group, who thinks this is actually very important and he would do something -- he recently came to the rehearsal of the children's

chorus, rehearsal, it was christmas day in russia, basically, president like all of us has a right to simply be free, you know. he chose to be there with the kids who represented all regions of russia. >> having the president show an interest in art and opera, is one thing. on the other hand, political freedom in russias has gone backwards in the last ten years, wouldn't you say? >> yes, and no. because of '90s we're not really a freedom you dream of. that's my again, modest opinion. i've known you for some time and i have no reason to invent anything, again, i'm so grown up, i made up my mind on many, many things already and i looked at mr. putin for many years and just looked, and i wanted him to act, not to promise, and that's why today i can talk about him, because i just look at actions. again, it's not only important thing for the country, culture,

it is important, russia without culture is not a country, let's say, it's just a huge piece of land. the country makes it together with cultural identity and then it's a country. >> valery gergiev, pleasure to have you on. >> my pleasure. up next, today is america's big day celebrating football. if you want to make real money, some say, you would need to think about real football. i'll explain. ♪ ♪ we are one, under the sun ♪ under the sun... [ female announcer ] fiber and protein. together as one. introducing new fiber one protein cereal. mayo? corn dogs? you are so outta here! aah! [ female announcer ] the complete balanced nutrition of great-tasting ensure. 24 vitamins and minerals, antioxidants, and 9 grams of protein. [ bottle ] ensure®. nutrition in charge™.

i took medicine but i still have symptoms. [ sneeze ] [ male announcer ] truth is not all flu products treat all your symptoms. what? [ male announcer ] alka-seltzer plus severe cold and flu speeds relief to these eight symptoms. [ breath of relief ] thanks. [ male announcer ] you're welcome. ready? go.

beginning with woodrow wilson in 1913 most presidents have read their annual message before congress as president obama did this week. however, a few presidents have followed the 19th century practice of simply submitting their addresses in written form. which brings me to my question of the week? who was the last president to submit a state of the union in written form only? harry truman? richard nixon? jimmy carter? or george h.w. bush? stay tuned and we'll tell you the correct answer.

this week i'm recommending a film instead of a book, it's called "silicon valley" and it aired as part of pbs's american series. the documentary makes you realize how unique the culture of silicon valley is, but also how accidental it is that it happened to be located in california. it was all thanks to just one man. and now for the last look. today is super bowl sunday here in the united states. the biggest day of the year for the national football league. it's a huge event in america, of course. compared to what the rest of the world calls football, all this fanfare is a drop in the bucket. let's check the numbers. more than 100 million people will probably tune in to the super bowl, but over 900 million people tuned into the 2010 world cup final and more than 3.2 billion fans watched part of the tournament. the world's most valuable football team, which i mean

soccer team, real madrid, is reportedly valued at $1 billion more than the highest valued nfl team, the dallas cowboys, and yearly global revenues for soccer are almost as much as revenues for all u.s. professional sports combined. now, nfl revenues are nothing to sneeze at. but even they know a few more global fans wouldn't hurt. in recent years, the nfl has tried to organize a china bowl in beijing, but it never came to fruition. and for the past few years, the nfl has played games in wembley stadium, outside london, three are scheduled for next season. good luck trying to get those global fans to switch their football loyalties. the correct answer is c, jimmy carter. his 1981 state of the union was the last to be submitted only in writing. at almost 34,000 words, it is also the longest ever. as you can see from this graph, the addresses generally became much shorter after wilson

revived the practice of reading them in person. the longest spoken speech was bill clinton's 1995 address at over 9,000 words, but he actually spent more time delivering his 2000 speech. >> that is our destiny. >> which clocked in at a chopping 1 hour, 28 minutes, 49 seconds. thanks to all of you for being part of my program this week. i will see you next week. stay tuned for "reliable sources." good morning. i'm brian stelter in new york city this week, it's time for "reliable sources." on the show today, -- weather throws a city into chaos. atlanta, mother nature's latest victim. did it have to be? reporters go to war with the powerful. >> you cannot blame the citizens of atlanta for this. >> the view from both sides of the battle. cnn weather warrior carol costello versus ex-fema chief michael brown. remember him? >> and brownie, you're doing a heck of a