have two opposing views on foreign policy. well now, look, folks, we have a lot of stuff happening in the world. get ready. it looks like all spring and all summer the republicans are going to take every problem on the world stage and use it as an excuse not to come together, not to solve america's problems, but just to blame president obama. the ukraine, benghazi, whatever it is. same script. obama is making america look weak. no, you guys are doing that. that's what you're doing. america looks weak when we jump into these dumb wars we can't pay for or win. america looks weak when we have an opposition party at home that won't help the president in war, in peace, overseas, or at home. now, newt, i think you guys need to make it official, the gop has now become the get obama party. that's what you guys are. >> i'd have more sympathy for you case except obama makes it so easy. so i think it's going to be an interesting debate tonight in the "crossfire" tonight. democratic representative karen bass of california. and republican senator ron

johnson of wisconsin. let me turn first to congresswoman, if i might. i can't believe i'm doing this. but i'm going to end up quoting maureen dowd of "the new york times." now, i have to confess, this for me is a new start. she said, "especially now that we have this scary world war iii vibe with the russians, we expect the president, especially one who ran as babe ruth, to hit home runs." now, as you know, he was quoted i think in manila as saying, well, he gets occasional singles. >> right. >> don't you think that standing up to putin requires babe ruth more than a guy hitting singles? isn't this really the big leagues? >> well, i think it's the big leagues. i think president obama is used to the big leagues and i think that his leadership on ukraine has been strong. the europeans now are stepping up to the plate and clearly it's going to take all of us.

it's the sanctions from the united states, but it is also the sanctions -- >> i have to ask, if this has been strong -- >> yes. >> -- what would weakness look like? >> i think weakness would look like doing nothing. i think what the president has done has been strong and i think he's showing the leadership and i think the europeans will follow. >> do you think it's had any impact on putin? >> i do think it's had impact on putin and it's had impact on the russian economy, okay? now, whether putin is willing to sacrifice the russian economy, that's the question. but i do think it is absolutely had impact on the economy. >> i agree with you, first of all, so good to see somebody here from california. listen, i am so tired of this weak versus strong thing. i want to get you into this, senator. it seems to any, what we hear from republicans, they want more belligerence, more saber rattling, more united states leaning over into other folk's business. the american people don't agree with that. they agree with the president. let me show you this. if you look at the actual numbers, 20% say we should be more active even in the face of

all this stuff. 47% of americans are saying, listen, we can't solve the whole world's probable. we shoub doild be doing more stt home. >> let me first challenge what you said in your opening comment that we're blaming president obama. i personally blame vladimir putin. but the fact of the matter is, we have shown weakness. we haven't shown the strength -- no, we have to show strength and resolve. vladimir putin isn't going to listen to words. the president says all kinds of good things but has to back those with action. he'll only respond to action. so, no, what we should be doing is honoring the request of the courageous people in ukraine, provide them some defensive weapons. we should open up our energy markets. we're wasting so much natural gas. we ought to capture that, build pipelines and export that to ukraine and europe. >> my understanding is in terms of the liquified natural gas,

those contracts are under way. it's going to take them about a year before they come online. >> this president can move that a lot quicker and he's not doing that. >> i don't believe so because the contracts are under way. it does take a while for it to come online. you know, my republican colleagues and both of us are in the minorities, every time something comes up, all roads lead back to keystone. and i'll tell you, even if keystone is being built today, it would take a year for it to be online. >> allow the permit applications to move forward. have you heard the president announce the permit applications to move forward? that would be a powerful signal then and there. we have to recognize what gives vladimir putin strength. his oil and gas reserves. europe's dependence on that. we have to break that dependence, break that monopoly. >> even if keystone was up and running, it's still a drop in the bucket in terms of -- >> i'm talking about the lng terminals. signal what we should be doing. >> it is moving forward. it's just going to take a while. >> by the way, i'm for a very aggressive energy policy. i think it would be a factor. but i think the reason the

president's getting in trouble is that you can follow the polling numbers that van had. 47% of the country wants a last active foreign policy 19%, 20% wants a more activist foreign policy. the president has been trying to do both. that is, he doesn't want to use military force, but he draws red lines. he ends up getting, talking about all sorts of places but not doing anything. isn't there -- how do you have an activist/nonactivist, interventionist/noninterventi interventionist policy? the pentagon, for example, was counting kevlar vests as an offensive weapon. they wouldn't send anything that was useful to ukraine. you're either going to do things or not do things, but this talk without effectiveness, isn't that a real problem? >> well, i actually don't think that it is, and i do think he has been effective, but it is a real pushback. i can tell you, constituents in my district, the last thing in

the world they want to hear is us getting into another conflict. that's a real issue. >> you know why that is, though? because this president -- >> they're tired of war. >> no, this president hasn't taken the time to explain why syria is a national security issue for us. >> hold on a second. >> he's not taken the time to explain why vladimir putin's aggressive expansion does threaten our national security in the world order. >> criticized for explaining too much. >> can't have it both ways. >> he's deliberating too pump. >> he didn't say a word about syria, all of a sudden draws a red line. that red line is crossed because he -- no, it's an example of how this president has not led by -- >> let me ask you one question. let me ask you one question. first of all, people want to go back and act like if he had bombed syria we'd be in a stronger position. if we were bogged in in syria right now, we'd be in a weak ee

position to deal with putin. >> would have already changed vladimir putin's calculous. the reason vladimir putin is doing this is because he can do it with impunity. what he got out of his aggression toward georgia was a reset. >> the aggression under george, that was with george w. bush who just invaded two countries. >> with him, actually -- >> who was a lame duck president. the election was happening. and president obama came in and rewarded vladimir putin for that aggression with a reset. a reset button was actually awarded. that hasn't worked too well. >> let me just say a couple things. first of all, my big disappointment with you and with your party is there -- >> i can't imagine -- >> -- is that there's not one thing you guys have put forward that the president is adisagreeing with. you don't want direct military involvement against putin right now, do you? >> i want us to provide defensive weapons. things like anti-tank weapons to the trained members of the ukrainian military. >> the only debate between republicans and democrats right

now in this town is how many sanctions, how fast, and what's the truth? nonmilitary involvement. >> we want to see -- >> and president obama announced he's going to allow those applications for those lng terminals, those permits to proceed forward. that would be a powerful signal. >> the terminals are moving forward. it's just going to take them about a year to come online. i don't know what you mean when you say that. >> it's going back to keystone. that permit has taken five years. >> no, but that is -- >> we fought and won world war ii in a shorter time period. >> i was going to make the same point. we're moving at a pace that's so bureaucratic and cumbersome, if you're putin you're sitting there thinking the president probably doesn't mean whatever he just said. the congress probably won't back him. the american people don't want to get involved. so, you know, if i end up -- >> if we have the keystone pipeline, putin would fall down and beg for mercy? >> we're using it as an example of just his lack of leadership and the fact that i don't believe he's going to allow those -- >> you know what i think is

really important, when we're going to sit here and talk about ukraine, we do have to continue to talk about europe. so europe's role, the eu's role. >> absolutely. >> this is not all about the united states. >> first of all, i think europe will always be weaker than we are. so if we're weak enough, they'll be really weak. but next, i'll tell you where former president bush is wrong about vladimir putin zblchbl. we want you at home to answer tonight's "crossfire question." when did vladimir putin take power in russia? "a," 1994, "b," 1999, or "c," 2004? we'll have the answer when we get back. this is the first power plant in the country to combine solar and natural gas at the same location.

during the day, we generate as much electricity as we can using solar. at night and when it's cloudy, we use more natural gas. this ensures we can produce clean electricity whenever our customers need it. ♪

[ chainsaw buzzing ] humans. sometimes, life trips us up. sometimes, we trip ourselves up. and although the mistakes may seem to just keep coming at you, so do the solutions. like multi-policy discounts from liberty mutual insurance.

save up to 10% just for combining your auto and home insurance. call liberty mutual insurance at... to speak with an insurance expert and ask about all the personalized savings available for when you get married, move into a new house, or add a car to your policy. personalized coverage and savings -- all the things humans need to make our world a little less imperfect. call... and ask about all the ways you could save. liberty mutual insurance -- responsibility. what's your policy? welcome back. here's the answer to our "crossfire" quiz. vladimir putin has effectively been in control of russia for 15 years since 1999.

here's a frightening thought. under russia's constitution, putin could be in charge until 2024. in other words, he could serve with president george p. bush or president chelsea clinton. but some u.s. presidents including republicans keep underestimating him. today, president george w. bush who once famously said he had looked into putin's eyes and saw his soul gave a new explanation about him. >> did you misjudge him early or were you trying to open the door? >> i think he changed. of course, presidents should owo open the door and give people a chance except for the despicable tyrants. at that time, it looked like he wanted to be, you know, work with the west. >> president bush reflects our entire foreign policy lead in both parties. they continue to believe bad people can be good people if only we be nice to them. putin has been putin for the entire time he's been around.

he was putin in the kgb. he's been putin since he started running the country 99. we have to see him for what he really is in the words of former defense secretary bill gates, a stone cold killer. back with us in the "crossfire" congresswoman karen bass and senator ron johnson. i think you feel like that's a pretty grim but maybe accurate view of putin. >> i do. i think it's rather scary. some of the photographs of him show he looks pretty thuggish although we don't call him that. >> the only change is he's been emboldened. >> right. >> he's gotten into that power. his head is expanding. he's more dangerous now. >> i would agree with you, and i do think it's because of the entire world. not because of president obama that he's emboldened. >> you were commenting during the break, you'd just been in ukraine. >> right. >> and i'd ask both of you, you really believe if he's determined to be aggressive that we can stop him? >> probably not militarily.

from my standpoint, it makes no sense for russia economically. >> right. >> just doesn't. you really have a megalo maniac, egomaniac in vladimir putin who wants the power and able to move forward. i don't know how you stop that other than to potentially change his calculous and hopefully he's rational enough to realize his economy will suffer. >> i love this conversation. now we're actually trying to g figure out something. here's my problem. this is the not the conversation we're hearing today from the republicans on the hill. >> you're not listening close enough. you have too much of a filter. >> actually -- >> we're all reasonable. >> benghazi is reasonable? here's what i don't understand. right now, we've got the entire eyes of the world focused on ukraine, what's going on there. it's the most dangerous part of the world. and your party is 1,300 miles off talking about benghazi on a different continent. why are you guys so obsessed about that issue on a week like this? >> president obama's administration shouldn't have lied to the american people for

weeks on that. they should have been tra transparent, got the story out. >> you've never made a mistake? >> this was far more than a mistake. >> more important thing for the republican party to be talking about on national television other than ben gaughazibenghazi? >> an e-mail from rhodes, a smoking gun that proves this white house -- >> a strategy? >> you're the one who brought it up. i was happy talking about you ya yan. you brought it up. >> there's agreement here. the senator and i agree. i think putin can be brought to his knees through economy, so he has to make a choice. does he want to invade ukraine or going to sacrifice his economy? so we kick up sanctions and increase to a sectoral approach meaning the banks and the financial sector and then the europeans join in. bring his economy to its knees. >> we need to do more than that because economic pressure requires rationality in his part. he might be rational, but he really would respond to action, i think like you say, you've got

to provide defensive weaponry. >> to quote my mentor, bob michael, i'm going to be the skunk at the garden party for a second. >> okay. >> putin is cutting deals with japan. he's cutting deals with china. he's about to cut a very unique deal with north korea that may involve a railroad from south korea. he, i think, is in a position where he is anticipating whatever we're going to do. we haven't been able to change cuba with sanctions that go back to 1960. >> cuba is a whole other discussion. >> you look at a country that size, and i am very concerned. >> by the way, that's the point. sanctions work pretty good when it's asymmetric, when you have a very small -- like iran, north korea. cuba hasn't worked. when you have an economy as large as russia, couple trillion, there's a lot of interdependencies, we'll never put the type of crypts sanctiip sanctions because it's a double-edged sword. >> make your point. >> the world has not supported

our policy with cuba. we had a blockade against cuba for over five decades and doesn't have the international support. >> you think china, japan, india, iran are going to support the american sanctions in russia? >> i don't think they'd support them because they're the american sanctions. i think when europe weighs in in a much bigger way it really increases the pressure. >> don't you think as this thing develops, listen, right now europe has been timid, have not been that helpful. you look at the scenes now. these are going to get worse and worse. don't you think that at a certain pioint the europeans do come around and the president's patient hand of using sanctions -- you don't start with your last card. you start with your first card. don't you think the calculations of the european s begins to change? >> i don't think the europeans would ever support the sanctions that would change putin's calculous. >> you think if obama gave a better speech, they'd do something different? >> no. >> my point about president obama is he's shown weakness for five years. the world has seen it.

that's dangerous. the world actually does look for american leadership and as they're witnessing this, north korea is watching. iran's watching. china's they are all emboldened by our weakness, our lack of resolve. who respects america more after five years of barack obama? >> let's go back to bush and talk about how the world respects. i bet you would. >> let me just say, i think what is really sobering and frightening whereby we are right now, and you saw this a little bit as they started talking through what is going on in ukraine today is probably the only thing that would really slow putin down is genuinely arming the ukrainians. that is a big decision. we went through the whole cold war for 50 years. and russians went into east germany in '53. they went into hungary in '56. they went into prague in '68. we were always very careful. they have 1700 nuclear weapons.

>> but it wasn't arming those countries that led to tend of the cold war and the collapse of the soviet union. >> a very long-term collapse. >> it was economic. >> we need to be thinking about a 20-year plan to be dealing with putin. >> yes. >> not a 20-week plan. >> i would tend to agree with you on that. and i don't understand why if this is true, and i appreciate your perspective, where are the republicans who are willing to play this longer game with this president? you talk about how weak this president. i don't think this president looks week to al qaeda. i don't think this president looks weak to moammar gadhafi. i think america looks weak when the republican party attacks this president when he goes for peace, when he goes for war, when he tries to do overseas, stuff at home. where is the one area you are willing to work with this president on? >> first thing i said we had to go, look at this strategically and we have to open up world energy markets we have to export our energy resources. break up that monopoly. you mentioned moammar gadhafi. that was the white house saying

that president obama was leading from behind. that didn't work so well. really behind. i think the whole debacle of that strategy and benghazi was -- >> we have to keep on after the break. we want you at home to get involved in this. we want you to weigh in on today's fireback question. can the united states prevent putin from taking over eastern ukraine? i want you to tweet yes or no, using #crossfire. we'll give you the results after the break. also, we're going have the outrages of the day. mine has to do with sports teams and their owners. but it's probably not what you think. when we get back. ♪ norfolk southern what's your function? ♪ ♪ hooking up the country helping business run ♪ ♪ build! we're investing big to keep our country in the lead. ♪ load! we keep moving to deliver what you need. and that means growth, lots of cargo going all around the globe. cars and parts, fuel and steel, peas and rice, hey that's nice! ♪ norfolk southern what's your function? ♪ ♪ helping this big country move ahead as one ♪ ♪ norfolk southern how's that function? ♪

because you can't beat zero heartburn. woo hoo! [ male announcer ] prilosec otc is the number one doctor recommended frequent heartburn medicine for 8 straight years. one pill each morning. 24 hours. zero heartburn.

frequent heartburn medicine for 8 straight years. that corporate trial by fire when every slacker gets his due. and yet, there's someone around the office who hasn't had a performance review in a while. someone whose poor performance is slowing down the entire organization. i'm looking at you phone company dsl. check your speed. see how fast your internet can be. switch now and add voice and tv for $34.90. comcast business built for business.

we are back with congresswoman bass and senator johnson. now it's time for the outrages of the day. now, i am outraged that we're all outraged, but only about this sterling guy. who cares about him. what about the deeper racial problem in sports, the one that is staring us in the face every single game. now look. between baseball, basketball, and football, we have nearly 100 american teams. 100 teams. now except for one person, michael jordan, every single principle owner is white. but the folks who are sweating at the bottom of the pyramid of the game are mostly people of color. now that's not 2014, that's 1814. and to me, that's a real outrage. what do you think about that, congresswoman? >> well, i think it's an excellent point. and you know what? i'm hopeful about the clippers, because you have oprah winfrey. you have magic johnson, and magic johnson has an interest in the dodgers. so i'm hoping that they will be able to step in and take

advantage. >> be an advantage with his big cnn contract. >> my view is all the shake-up the billionaire owners, some of the teams ought to watch the green bay model. i think having a community-owned team is the center of wisconsin. >> that would be the -- >> that's right. >> community owners. >> so on my side, bill clinton has always been self-aggrandizing and extremely loose with the truth. 10 even though it ought to be an outrage, it's really no surprise that during a speech this week he was self-aggrandizing and dishonest in taking sole credit for the prosperity of the 1990s. listen to this. >> in all the so-called prosperity of the 1980s, only 77,000 of our fellow americans move from poverty into the middle class. in the '90s, 100 times as many, 7.7 million people did. that was policy.

>> in a way, clinton is right. if he had not governed so badly in the first two years he was in office, republicans would not have taken control of the congress, and none of the necessary work would have gotten done. so if he wants to take sole credit for the getting the republican congress elected in 1994, the congress that forced him to reform welfare and balance the budget, it's just fine with me. >> okay. well, look, we don't have enough time for me to fight you on that one. so we got to just let you have that one tonight. we're going to check in on our fireback results. the united states prevent putin from taking over eastern ukraine. right now 17% of you say yes. 83% of you say no. my goodness. what is your position? do you think that we could stop him nor? >> we've got to change his calculus. if he wants to roll, we certainly can't stop him militarily. that's his choice. but we have to change his calculus. >> 83% of the people agree with you on that. i want to thank you, representative karen bass and ron johnson. this debate going to continue on

online at cnn.com/crossfire as well as facebook and twitter. from the left, i'm van jones. >> from the right, i'm newt gingrich. join us tomorrow for another edition of crossfire. and "erin burnett outfront" starts right now. >> thank you. next, new details about what happened to flight 370. why did officials wait four hours before doing anything about the missing jet? plus, new video of a baltimore landslide. the moment the earth opened up and swallowed an entire block. this is unbelievable. and donald sterling's many women. we know about the woman on the infamous tape. tonight the other other woman. another mistress revealed. let's go "outfront." >> good evening, everyone. i'm erin burnett. "outfront" tonight, did anyone