rapidly to the northeast. >> so what does that mean, chad? what does that mean? where is it going? is it going toward minneapolis/st. paul? >> it is, wolf, but we're hours, or at least an hour away from that. the cell is all by itself. it is that super cell using all of the energy, not battling any other storms. remember the game battling tops when we were kids. if you pulled one string and let the one battling top go, it would go forever. pull a bunch of them, they'd battle each other and fall down. this is battling nothing. this is going to move up toward the north and northeast, about 100 miles, maybe a little less now into minneapolis suburbs. it will be from the southwest first. we'll keep an eye on it as it makes its way that way. there's nothing at this point to stop it. there you go. probably 48 miles, moving at 30, 35 miles per hour. do the math, that's at least an hour out, wolf. >> all right. we'll stay on top of this story for our viewers obviously. tim purington, be careful over there, one of the storm chasers

in the middle of all of that. chad, we'll stay in touch with you. we're following new developments in the search for flight 370. passengers' families are making new demands for raw data from the investigation while some of those relatives are starting to get insurance payouts. our aviation correspondent rene marsh has the very latest. >> wolf, millions of dollars have been dolled out to these families. it is giving them the financial footing that they need to begin to move forward, but for some of these families, accepting this money means accepting the harsh reality their loved ones are no longer alive. even if no sign of the plane or proof of the passengers' fate, malaysian life insurance companies are starting to pay out. >> i think the presumption of death under these circumstances is appropriate and it allows some of these families to at least financially move forward. >> reporter: citing extraordinary circumstances, the company shelled out $4 million u.s. dollars to families. this is from personal life insurance policies, separate from airline compensation. >> the airline really should be sprinkling out and paying up the

maximum amount. >> reporter: but payouts aren't enough. in a new open letter, families demanded the raw data that led search teams to the south indian ocean and input on what happens next. australia, china, and malaysia are currently reanalyzing the data and planning the next search phase. >> the most important thing they can do is stop and think. before you engage a dozen companies with their ships and vehicles to go out there and start mapping. >> reporter: the families called for the oceangraphic institution to lead the search. david gallo was a part of their team which found air france 447. that search also far from perfect. highlighting why the current reanalysis is critical. >> the modeler said we're 95% sure that the plane is in that box, and they were 100% wrong. >> reporter: in the case of malaysia airlines, investigators

say all of the data they have points to this area. it's where the ocean shield and bluefin-21 will continue searching soon. and where pings believed to be from black boxes and the final satellite connection from the plane were detected. but even before any wreckage is found, some governments already taking action. india just issued new rules requiring realtime tracking of passenger planes. and a new proposal for a may european air safety agency would require black box pingers last longer and cockpit voice recorders capture 20 hours instead of 2. under international agreements, the airlines must pay these families a certain amount of money, but if the families do want to sue, they can get even more money on top of that, wolf. >> rene, thanks very much, rene marsh reporting. that's it for me. remember, always follow us on twitter. tweet me @wolfblitzer, tweet the show @cnnsitroom.

join us again tomorrow in "the situation room." watch us live. always dvr the show so you won't miss a moment. thanks very much for watching. i'm wolf blitzer in "the situation room." now let's step into the "crossfire with newt gingrich and howard dean following breaking news. congress just voted to create a select committee to investigate benghazi. wolf, this is a very important decision. it makes a great -- it is a very important to recognize that the congress is going to do its job and going to work precisely on finding out what happened. >> it makes a great campaign slogan, newt. vote republican. two more years of gridlock in bengha benghazi. the debate starts right now. >> tonight on "crossfire," scandal weakened the house. republicans pushed through a special committee on benghazi. >> this is a serious investigation. >> serious investigation? or serious politics? >> i do not believe there is any reason for it to continue in this way, but they get to call the shots.

on the left, howard dean. on the right, newt gingrich. in the "crossfire," representative hjavier becerra. and representative aaron schock, an illinois republican. were there cover-ups? are republicans on a witch hunt? tonight on "crossfire." welcome to "crossfire." i'm howard dean on the left. >> i'm newt gingrich on the right. in the "crossfire" tonight, two members of congress. breaking news, just moments ago, the house approved a special committee to investigate the benghazi terror attack and the obama administration's ensng cover-up. this is a dangerous moment for former secretary of state hillary clinton. she's now facing more questions than ever about her failures as secretary of state. this serious investigation comes on the heels of revelations about how her state department ignored the rise of terrorists

who now have kidnapped hundreds of schoolgirls in nigeria. soon, everyone will see how secretary clinton not only failed america, she endangered america during those four years. >> newt, you've been wrong before, you're wrong again. tonight we're going to find out exactly why. in the "crossfire" tonight, california representative javier becerra who's chairman of the house democratic caucus, and republican representative aaron schock of illinois. >> before we get to you guys, we're going to go first to cnn chief congressional correspondent dana bash on capitol hill for the latest on the vote. dana? >> reporter: newt, it passed almost entirely on party lines. and when i say it, of course, i mean this creation of a select committee to look into benghazi. that is something that was not unexpected. the fact that this would pass. what we still do not know yet is whether democrats will participate. i just came from the hallways just off the house floor where it's pretty clear that there is intense negotiations going on

behind the scenes between the house speaker and the democratic leadership to figure out if there is some kind of accommodation that can be made that will allow democrats to say that it's okay to participate. the main thing that they're focused on is whether or not they can have equity or paroi i way is a pane nonos go out to witnesses and those are the discussions going on as we speak. >> thanks a lot, dana. congressman, why do you guys keep doing this? the american people are interested in job. is this a programming strategy for fox whose average viewer age is 68? what makes you think this is going to help you win the election? >> well, first of all i think before elections, the elections are over and we have a job to do and one of them is oversight. in addition to being a regular member of congress, i also serve in the ways & means committee, the oversight subcommittee, and director shulman of the irs came before our committee and repeatedly said there was not targeting going on. we now know that's false. same thing with benghazi. repeatingly we were misled.

the american people were fed incorrect information. we now know the administration continued to tell the lie even after they knew the facts were false. and i think the question that really begs that every american should ask is why is the administration so unwilling, so unwanting of the facts? i don't believe the president for one minute wanted anybody in benghazi to die, but as the ceo of this country, why wouldn't he want to get to the bottom of who made the decisions, what were the play calls and what can we do moving forward to make sure it doesn't happen? same thing with irs. i don't think the president directed the irs to do the illegal behavior. somebody did and we need to get to the bottom of it. >> let me ask you, congressman becerra. you're an important member of the leadership, you chair the caucus. do you think that the democratic members should participate in the committee? >> newt, quite honestly, i think what speaker john boehner thought a month ago that this was unnecessary as republican

speaker john boehner, himself, said. we've done this already. i'm not sure if aaron disagrees with the house armed services republican members' report or if he disagrees with the government oversight republican committee members' report or if he disagrees with the house foreign affairs republican committee members' report. or if he disagrees with his own house conference members' report on this benghazi incident. or if he perhaps disagrees with the senate intelligence committee. or perhaps the other reports that were done, another two or three more that have been done. we've done this. we've been there. we've done that. what's coming out, newt, quite honestly, is republicans are using this as a fund-raising tool. we've already seen how the republican national campaign committee is using this to raise dollars from its members. >> so let's give aaron -- >> xavier, let me respond to my good friend. mr. becerra. more than any of those reports, i think i want to listen to the will of the congress. the will of majority of congress. by the way, the vote tonight on forming the special committee to

benghazi was bipartisan. the vote to hold lois lern lern contempt was bipartisan. more votes to hold lois lerner in contempt and benghazi had more votes than obamacare. members on your side of the aisle -- the american people deserve the answers to these questions. >> what i want to know, congr s congressman, isn't this select committee clearly a vote of no confidence, and darrell issa, investigating this for month the and got absolutely nothing done? >> no, this is a consolidation of five committees looking into this matter into one. the administration should welcome this, they should cooperate and it makes things more efficient. >> but the five committees got absolutely nothing done. what makes you think the sixth committee -- >> because the administration has been stone walling them, have been uncooperate as if the ways & means committee. >> let me come back if i might, xavier. i'm a little confused. when the committee was formed in the reagan years to investigate

iran contra, by the democrats, dick cheney was actually the ranking republican and the republicans all served. when the committees were formed during watergate by the democrats, republicans served on the committees. i mean, historically, when the congress engages in an investigation, the minority party, whichever one it happens to be at that time almost has an absolute moral obligation to participate. how will you go home and justify not participating once the house has actually voted and the house is a body in a bipartisan vote, as aaron tried to point out, has voted to create this committee? >> and, newt, i think you're absolutely right. we have a moral obligation to do this in the right way. therefore, we're asking republicans to make sure there's a fair and balanced and nonpartisan affair. it so far looks like it's not going to be in any of those things. the scope of it is undetermined

and it's unclear what kind of authority will be provided to the other side, the democrats so we can make sure it's done bipartisanly. so as a senior democrat, are you going to advise speaker pelosi to find a way to join or to find a way to not join this investigative committee? >> i would like to make sure that if the speaker, speaker boehner believes that we have to have an eighth investigation that he's going to make sure it's impartial and it's done in a balanced way. so far that hasn't been the case. you'll see that it's being done for campaign purposes. >> you and i both -- i used to serve in the house as you remember. we've both been down this road before. in the end, yes or no, do you have an obligation morally to participate in a committee once it's been created? >> we have to fulfill oversight obligations if it's real. i'm not sure this is real. so far it looks like it's a campaign stunt to raise money for the republican national campaign committee. if republicans, if aaron today will say on national tv he will call his committee, his

republican national committee to stop raising money off of this benghazi investigation, then maybe we can have some sense of bipartisanship. but right now, they're already raising money off of a committee that hasn't had its first hearing. >> let's give aaron a chance. >> look, to suggest xavier becerra or aaron schock controls the fund raising apparatus of either of our parties -- >> shame on you, aaron. >> sir, both sides raise money on substantive issues we debate. investigating benghazi. affordable care act or obamacare. the democratic party raised money off george w. bush and the iraq war, raised money off of environmental issues, off keystone pipeline. you guys have sent out all kinds of fund-raising mail on environmental concerns with keystone. so, look, both sides' political apparatuses do what they do to raise money and drive whatever the hot-topic issue of today. that should not determine our --

>> we know what -- >> moderators' privilege here and say there would be those who disagree with those raising money off four dead americans. >> howard, if i could get this one point in. >> house republicans ought to be doing right now, there are things that would actually help the american people instead of wasting their time and money. and here's a "crossfire" quiz about wasting time. not counting weekends, how many days off have house members taken so far this year? is it 15, 21, or 28? we'll have that answer when we get back.

really... so our business can be on at&t's network for $175 dollars a month? yup. all five of you for $175. our clients need a lot of attention. there's unlimited talk and text. we're working deals all day. you get 10 gigabytes of data to share. what about expansion potential? add a line anytime for 15 bucks a month. low dues... great terms... let's close. new at&t mobile share value plans. our best value plans ever for business.

say "hi" rudy. [ barks ] [ chuckles ] i'd do anything to keep this guy happy and healthy. that's why i'm so excited about these new milk-bone brushing chews. whoa, i'm not the only one. it's a brilliant new way to take care of his teeth. clinically proven as effective as brushing. ok, here you go. have you ever seen a dog brush his own teeth? the twist and nub design cleans all the way down to the gum line, even reaching the back teeth. they taste like a treat, but they clean like a toothbrush. nothing says you care like a milk-bone brushing chew. [ barks ]

welcome back. here's the answer to our "crossfire" quiz. not counting weekends, house members have taken 38 days off so far this year. that is more than five weeks off. next week makes six. so what have they accomplished? well, they haven't taken up immigration reform, but moments

ago voted so investigate benghazi for the fifth time. they haven't extended unemployment benefits that ran out last christmas, but they want a special prosecutor to investigate the irs. they haven't done anything about equal pay for women but they held a woman, lois lerner, in contempt of court for daring to invoke her fifth amendment rights. haven't passed a jobs bill or highway construction funding bill either, but they voted to repeal obamacare for the 50th time. representatives xavier becerra and aaron schock are in the "crossfire." >> let me, if i could, start with congressman becerra. something which has emerged only in the last two day i think extends and deepens the concern about benghazi and about the whole question of secretary clinton as secretary of state. as you know, the group boko haram in nigeria is an islamist extremist group. they're fanatics, very dangerous. have killed several thousand people. now they have kidnapped some 300

girls. have released some of the 300. but it turns out, this is surprising to everybody, that while secretary clinton was at the secretary of state, they turned down designating this group as a terrorist group. it was only when john kerry came in it was designated. don't you think in terms of legitimate questions by the congress that finding out why was this group not designated, asking questions about how the decision was made is actually a legitimate function of legislative oversight? >> well, first i want to thank our government and the president for doing everything possible to work with the nigerian government to try to recover all of the girls that have been kidnapped. we know it's more than 300. so far as the terrorism that is going on, we know of many cells that are out there. some are just small cells. some are clearly full-blown al qaeda operation. and so what we're trying to do is do the best we can throughout

the world, not just in africa, but elsewhere. and so as you know, whether it's syria, whether it's ukraine, whether it's parts of africa, is there is a lot going on. and i'm thankful that the president and this administration is going to go out there to try to make tour that the nigerian government doesn't do it, we're going to try to help them recover those girls. >> so let's get back to benghazi for a minute. congressman, i just read the national republican congressional committee offered to allow me to become a benghazi watchdog for somewhere between $25 or a $500 contribution. so what i would like to ask you, would you like to become a benghazi wash dog? >> i like to think as a member of congress i already get that privilege. obviously this is a hot topic of the day. folks ask me about it when i go back to my district on the weekends. as i said earlier in the show, both political fundraising apparatuses -- >> so it's okay with you to raise money off this issue? you're supporting -- >> i think the issue is this.

the american people deserve answers. and if you want answers, it's going to require the house of representatives to investigate. >> which means i should donate $500? >> it means if you want answers from this administration, you want to maintain the house majority and grow it. because but for the house majority, the republican house majority, this administration would be answering to no one. >> so this is a base appeal? >> this is an appeal to people who want a check and balance on this administration. and right now the only check and balance is the house republican majority. >> do you agree with congressman gowdy and speaker bain they're the nrc should not be asking for money on this issue? >> i think i haven't read the fundraising appeal, okay. what i'm suggesting to you is for me to go home to my consistents and say the only reason we're going to get any answers on benghazi is because we have a republican majority in the house. and if you think that is important on all of these issues, not just benghazi, irs, and others, then you need to help me grow and maintain a republican majority. >> last question.

so i'll ask you the question that the nrcc asked. will you automatically add your name today to join us and become a benghazi watchdog? >> like i said, i'm already a benghazi watchdog. >> let me just say i actually do think, and i'll come back to this later that are there are some things that are clearly beyond the pale. and thing is a zone where we ought to be much more careful about how he raise the money. stay here. we want you at home to weigh in on today's fire-back question. the benghazi investigation a worthwhile use of taxpayer money? tweet yes or no using #crossfire. we'll have the results after the break. we also have the outrage of the day. i'm outraged about what a democratic congressman from arizona is doing to raise money ah of dead veterans. , the will... mobilizing to take on the world? you don't know "aarp." aarp and its foundation are taking on hunger with 29 million meals donated. drive to end hunger teams with local agencies

to reach the hungriest among us. if you don't think feed the hungry when you think aarp, then you don't know "aarp." find more surprising possibilities and get to know us at aarp.org/possibilities.

(agent) i'll walk you guys through every step. there are a lot of buyers for a house like yours. (husband) that's good to know.

if your denture moves, it can irritate your gums. try fixodent plus gum care. it helps stop denture movement and prevents gum irritation. fixodent. and forget it.

and prevents gum irritation. could mean less waiting for things like security backups and file downloads you'd take that test, right? well, what are you waiting for? you could literally be done with the test by now. now you could have done it twice. this is awkward. check your speed. see how fast your internet can be. switch now and add voice and tv for $34.90. comcast business built for business.

welcome back. it's time for our outrages of the day. for months, cnn has reported the shocking number of veterans who have died waiting for treatment at veterans administration hospitals across the country. among the allegations, the v.a. hospital in phoenix kept a secret waiting list, yet arizona democratic representative kyrsten sinema is using the scandal as an excuse for political fundraising. this is more than an outrage, it's shameful. the house ethics committee should investigate a member who is exploiting the death of veterans to raise money. >> newt, here is my outrage. while we sit here arguing about faux congressional investigations designed to embarrass various democrats, you have 20 republican governors who are depriving nearly 5 mile

people of health care there is no good reason for blocking the expansion of medicaid. it's already paid for. it won't cost their states a dime. this is a classic example of governors not caring about the people who pay their salary. when i was governor, i remembered that i worked for the people who elected me, not against them. >> let's check on our fireback results. the benghazi investigation a worthwhile use of taxpayer money? right now 40% of you say yes, it is. 60% say no. i think i know how this is going to go. but let me start with you. you think it's a worthwhile use of taxpayer money? >> absolutely. >> representative? what do you think? >> after seven investigations, eight reports and millions already spent we should be spending our money working with a private sector group to create jobs for americans. >> somehow that was a predictably partisan response, which i've also gotten from howard dean and me. thanks to representatives becerra and the debate continues online at cnn.com/crossfire, as well as on facebook and twitter. >> from the left, i'm howard

dean. >> from the right, i'm newt gingrich. join us tomorrow for another edition of "crossfire." "erin burnett outfront" starts right now. next breaking news, tornadoes on the ground in the midwest. more on the way tonight. we have the live pictures of those storms. the forecast coming up. and clippers owner donald sterling breaking his silence. he says he is not a racist. meanwhile his wife says she is going to keep the clippers. and hgtv suddenly cancels a new show. what does the host's religion have to do with it? those hosts are our guests. let's go "outfront." good evening, everyone. i'm erin burnett "outfront" tonight. we begin with the breaking news. more than 47 million americans right now in the path of severe weather that is going right through the central u.s. and the