engage iraq -- iran when it comes to iraq. >> you could almost pick my jaw up off the table. >> i know. i know. he was -- he was quite adamant about it, too. >> sure was. thanks, gloria. this was fun. >> happy birthday i dana. >> thank you. >> that's it for us today. thanks for watching "state of the union." candy crowley returns next week. >> a very happy father's day to the dads and husbands in your life and in ours. fareed zakaria "gps" starts right now. this is gps, the global public square. welcome to all of you in the united states and around the world. i'm fareed zakaria coming to you live from new york. we will start the show today with the possible fall of iraq. eye sis, the al qaeda offshoot, has taken over city after city and is on the march to baghdad. can the terrorists be stopped?

and just who are they? i'll talk to a man who knows the region well, former u.s. ambassador to iraq and afghanistan, ryan crocker. and what can america do? i will talk to richard haas about washington's options. also, any hope of immigration reform is dead on arrival in congress. what does that mean for america's neighbors in mexico? i will ask that nation's finance minister. and the world cup, fifa is under attack for making money off the backs of brazilians, but really, it's part of a much larger problem, even here in the united states. call it the business of sports. finally, thailand may be in turmoil, but the generals still want people to just be happy. but first, here's my take. inevitably in washington, the question has surfaced, who lost

iraq? whenever america has asked this question, as it did with china in the 1950s or vietnam in the 1970s, the most important point to remember is the local ruler estate, the chinese nationalists, the south vietnamese government, were corrupt, inefficient and weak, unable to be inclusive and unwilling to fight with the dedication of their opponents. that same story is true of iraq, only much more so. so the first answer to the question is nuri al malaki lost iraq. the shiite prime minister and his ruling party have behaved like hugs, excluding the sunnis from power, using the army, police forces and militias to terrorize their opponents. but let's remember how nuri al malaki came to be prime minister of iraq in the first place. he was the product of a series of momentous decisions made by

the bush administration. having invaded iraq with a small force, what the expert tom ricks called the worst war plan in american history, the administration needed to find local allies fast. it quickly decided to destroy iraq's sunni-ruling establishment and empower the hardline shiite religious parties that had opposed saddam hussein. this meant that a structure of sunni power that had undergirded the area, for better or worse, for centuries, quickly collapsed. these moves to disband the army, dismantle the bureaucracy, and purge sunnis, in general, might have been more consequential than the actual decision to invade the country. if the bush administration deserves a fair share of blame for losing iraq, what about the obama administration and its decision to withdraw all american forces from the country by the end of 2011? i would have preferred to see a small american force left in iraq to try to prevent the

country's collapse. but let's remember why this force is not in iraq. prime minister maliki refused to provide the guarantees that every other country in the world that hosts u.s. forces provides. some comment tate verse blamed the obama administration for negotiating badly or half-heartedly, and perhaps this is true. but here's what a senior iraqi politician told me in the days the american deal was being discussed. "it will not happen," he said. maliki is:not allow american troops to stay on. iran has made very clear to maliki that its number one demand is that there be no american troops remaining in iraq and maliki owes them. this iraqi politician reminded me that maliki had spent more than two decades in exile, most of it in tehran and damascus and his party had been funded by iran for most of its existence. and in fact, maliki's government has followed policies that have

been, broadly speaking, pro-iranian and pro-syrian. washington is debate willing whether air strikes would work or training forces would be more effective, but its real problem is much largeary and a decade in the making. in iraq it is defending the indefensible. for more, go to c nchlt nchnn.c and read by "washington post" column this week. let's get started. let's go straight to baghdad and get the latest on the war in iraq with eyes sis. the latest accounts seem to suggest that baghdad was secure, but you are hearing something somewhat different?

>> reporter: maliki had drawn a line in the sand in samarra, about two hours' drive north of here. overnight the government called on the iraqi army to pull out of the base in bang cab ba. that is well south, 45 minutes northeast of baghdad, much closer to baghdad than samarra. and the army was to told pull out. it went out, took its weapons out and eye sis moved in within the hour. a from what we understand from calleddy intelligence forces and tribesmen fighting along eye sis, i talked to them two days ago this plan they are following through right now is the plan that they had all along, to move swiftly through the country to get to baghdad, to encircle baghdad to put pressure on maliki to resign or form a government of national unity, to take baghdad's international

airport and the latest we are hearing from the saudi source, an intention potentially to shell the northern outskirts of baghdad to put pressure on it. the sunni tribesmen i talked to said we don't want casualties in baghdad. we want to avoid that. different faxes fighting toward the city here, not clear which one is going to have the upper hand when they arrive, fareed. >> nic, the iraqi army on paper has -- the iraqi government, on paper, has 800,000 troops between the internal security forces and the actual army. what are they doing in these circumstance and why do they feel? >> reporter: multiple reasons they flee. troops in sunni areas feel afraid from behind, know the soup nist, the tribesmen are against maliki and acquiesce to the arrival of eye sis. some of the people in the army

themselves are sunnis and are fed up with nuri al malaki.isis some of the people in the army themselves are sunnis and are fed up with nuri al malaki. i was told there was a deal with senior iraqi military commanders to convince them to put down weapons, to take their uniforms off and they would be treated fairly. that was something they passed down to their subordinates. there's another strand in this as well, that these well-trained iraqi troops, well-trained and equipped by u.s. forces, i've been told by people who trained them, that they are -- that they are very capable of taking on isis, but these younger soldiers, junior soldiers, disaffected with more senior officers who they say have been hand-picked by maliki and his cronies in it for prestige for their families to be commanding strong units. these men don't respect their commanders, not going to fight for them. so, many reasons why the army is breaking down. the assessment from saudi intelligence is that command and

control in the army is breaking down at the moment. i would suggest that perhaps not command and control, but confidence in that structure is breaking down. in baghdad, we are told that the faces on the checkpoints are changing. that means there is lows less -- less faith on the men in the checkpoints who were there a few days ago. the government feels it needs to put in much more toughened fighters to keep control of the city. it's a complicated picture but that's the way it appears at the moment, fareed. >> fascinating reporting as always, nic. stay safe. up next, what should the united states be doing in iraq? what can it do? i will ask two former officials who have dealt with this at the highest level, former ambassador to iraq, ryan crocker and former director of policy planning, richard haas. you will want to hear this. predibut, manufacturings a prettin the united states do. means advanced technology.

we learned that technology allows us to be craft oriented. no one's losing their job. there's no beer robot that has suddenly chased them out. the technology is actually creating new jobs. siemens designed and built the right tools and resources to get the job done. you know that dream...

on my count. the one where you step up and save the day? make it happen. (crowd) oh no... introducing verizon xlte. hey guys, i got it right here! we've doubled our 4g lte bandwidth in cities coast to coast. so take on more. with xlte. for best results, use verizon. they're the days to take care of business.. when possibilities become reality. with centurylink as your trusted partner, our visionary cloud infrastructure and global broadband network free you to focus on what matters. with custom communications solutions and responsive, dedicated support, we constantly evolve to meet your needs. every day of the week. centurylink® your link to what's next.

let's dig deep near the iraq cries skis, joining me, two men, both held senior position, both with deep experience on iraq. ryan crocker was the u.s. ambassador to iraq from 2007 to 2009. he is now the dean of the bush school of government and public service at texas a&m. richard haas was director of policy planning at the state department during george w. bush's first term. he is now the president of the council on foreign relations. ambassador crocker, john mccain has said that one of the things he would do was send you back to baghdad. i want to know what you do, were you there, and i want to ask you specifically why you think that maliki would listen to you. you were telling him to be

inclusive and to do all the things that people now want him to do and there were 100,000 american troop there is at the time. do you think you would be able to do anything if you were to go? >> fareed, we have a very, very good ambassador there right now in the person of steve bekroft. but ambassadors can't do it all. you need heavy fire support on the diplomatic front. so if i were asked to return to iraq, the first thing i would request is that secretary kerry get on a plane immediately. we have lacked that high-level engagement with the iraqis that was so crucial during my term in office. so, we -- we need the secretary of state out there, in baghdad, right now. we need the president on the phone to the iraqi leadership, because the reality is the

iraqis are not in a position, they were not in a position when i was there, they are not in a position now, to work out hard compromises on their own. it's zero sum politics and there are a lot of strong, historical reasons for that. it is not all maliki's fault, although he does bear substantial blame. we are the essential middleman among sunni, shia and kurds. ambassadors can go just so far. >> would you, ambassador, use air strikes, you heard nic roberts robertson, who said the sunni tribes, a lot of sunnis, would feel, it appears to me, these were air strikes by the united states in support of a shia government. would you still support the air strikes? >> i would support very carefully targeted air strikes, but they would have to be in conjunction with a serious, high-level, diplomatic effort that would engage the shia, the

sunni and the kurdish leadership. we have got to help the iraqis come together in a unified fashion to confront a common threat. the air strikes, again, properly targeted, could help back up that we are serious about this. we are engaged. the politics have to take the forefront, but as we have seen in the past, they have got to be backed up by, you know, the second d, which is defense. >> richard haas, what are the dangers here and what would you do? >> i think the horse has left the barn. and by that, i mean, fareed, i think it's too late for the kind of diplomacy that ryan crocker is talking become as desirable as it might have been months or years ago. i also think essentially, the idea of iraq that's united, functioning country, good idea, but again, i think that's

essentially over. so at this point, what i would focus on is making the best of a terrible situation. i would put pressure on this isis group in syria. it's long since time to provide serious help to alternative opposition elements in syria so they don't have the luxury of just focusing on iraq. i would accept the fact that the kurdish area of the north is now effectively an independent state. i would make sure they'd essentially what they need. i would provide economic support for jordan, which is staggering under the enormous refugee burden. i would rethink our policy toward afghanistan. the last thing we want to do now is not have a residual force there, we ought to have learned the lesson here in iraq. and i think we -- you know, we could use air strikes, as ryan says, but quite honestly, at most, it is going to delay things, not going to be decisive, it's not going to be lasting, maybe we can bring about a serious government of national unity, but it hasn't worked now for over a decade, so quite frankly, i'm skeptical.

>> ryan, what would you do in syria? i know that, you know, on this program, you have been very cautious about intervening there, seeing it as you called it a forest fire that one would just have to let burn out. do you think there's anything one can do in syria that would be meaningful? >> fareed, i have been saying for months that our main effort has got to be on syria's neighbors. richard rightly points out that jordan is under tremendous pressure. so is lebanon. and again, i've been saying for months, we need to be doing more in iraq and we are now seeing, i think, the consequences of not doing more. i would disagree with richard staying is too late for diplomacy. maybe it is. maybe it isn't. but i think the iraqis, sunny, shia and kurds are all badly frightened here. there is a moment for us to step

in. the iranians are heavily engaged, the american secretary of state needs to be in baghdad, too, to see what can be done. because the stakes are very high here. this is al qaeda 6.0. and if they consolidate their territorial gains, they will be in a stronger position than they ever were in afghanistan prior to 9/11. and we know how that turned out. >> richard, describe what you see as the new middle east then, because what you're describing, as far as i can tell, is the united states strategy that really shores up the islands of stability, jordan, turkey, kurdistan, the golf states, of course, and accepts that there's going to be a very -- there are going to be very messy badlands

in the middle east. >> alas, far reed, i think that's where we are. the middle east we know is essentially drawn up or designed 100 years ago by the british and french foreign minister and that middle east is unraveling. if there's a historical anna log here, and not make you or anyone else watching this program feel very happy, it is europe in the early part of the 17th century, when you had political-religious wars went across boundaries, lasted for 30 years and i think we are into that sort of situation in the middle east. there's no boundary anymore between, say, syria and iraq. it may exist on a map on paper but not in reality. so, we have identities now that don't in any way line up with where the formal borders are. so, what we have to do is preserve those borders, as you say where we have friends, have real interests, some reason to belie believe involvement would pay off. other areas we have to contain, that might mean treating parts of the middle east the same way

now we have to treat parts of africa, say, or say parts of pakistan. these are no-go lands, that he is are badlands, need to have counterterrorism strategies, use drones, use aircraft, maybe even special forces on occasion, but we can't put humpty dumpty back together again and if 100,000 american troops or more for a decade in iraq couldn't do it, we had similar problems in afghanistan, i think we have got to accept the limits of what it is we can accomplish. sometimes in foreign policy, you try to create. other times in foreign policy, you try to prevent. i think right now with the middle east, we need to focus more on what it is we prevent rather than what we create. >> thank the both, fascinating perspectives. greatly appreciate your wisdom. next on "gps", the world cup. fifa has come under a lot of fire for how much tax-free money it is going to make while brazil foots the bill for the world cup. but the soccer federation is just one of many such groups with deals like this, including

some powerful ones in the united states. when we come back, we will name names, right here in america. kid: hey dad, who was that man? dad: he's our broker. he helps look after all our money. kid: do you pay him? dad: of course. kid: how much? dad: i don't know exactly. kid: what if you're not happy? does he have to pay you back? dad: nope. kid: why not? dad: it doesn't work that way. kid: why not? vo: are you asking enough questions about the way your wealth is managed? wealth management at charles schwab. i'm j-e-f-f and i have copd. i'm l-i-s-a and i have copd, but i don't want my breathing problems to get in the way

of hosting my book club. that's why i asked my doctor about b-r-e-o. once-daily breo ellipta helps increase airflow from the lungs for a full 24 hours. and breo helps reduce symptom flare-ups that last several days and require oral steroids, antibiotics, or hospital stay. breo is not for asthma. breo contains a type of medicine that increases risk of death in people with asthma. it is not known if this risk is increased in copd. breo won't replace rescue inhalers for sudden copd symptoms and should not be used more than once a day. breo may increase your risk of pneumonia, thrush, osteoporosis, and some eye problems. tell your doctor if you have a heart condition or high blood pressure before taking breo. ask your doctor about b-r-e-o for copd. first prescription free at mybreo.com

trwith secure wifie for your business. it also comes with public wifi for your customers. not so with internet from the phone company. i would email the phone company to inquire as to why they have shortchanged these customers. but that would require wifi. switch to comcast business internet and get two wifi networks included. comcast business built for business.

now for our "what in the world" segment. almost half of humanity will tune in to watch some part of the world cup spectacle, which kicked off this week in brazil. the football, by which i mean the soccer, will be spectacular, but the group that put it together has come under some fire. like other big-time sports organizations, fifa, international football's governing body, is a self-appointed, self-regulateded body with little accountability and massive revenues. it demands that countries adhere to its every whim when they agree to host the world cup. brazil has spent an astounding $11 billion to host the fifa tournament. fifa officials have to be treated like royalty and there have been accusations of bribery and other forms of corruption. accusations that are also clouding qatar's winning bid for the 2022 world cup. the demands can sometimes be

simply grotesque. in 2003, brazil's government banned the sale of alcohol in stadiums due to the rise in alcohol-related deaths. but hbo's john oliver points out, that law is no match for fifa. bud wiser is one of its main sponsors and fifa demanded that brazil's booze ban be overturned, which led to this outburst from john oliver on hbo. >> and at this point, you can either be horrified by that or relieved that fifa wasn't also sponsored by cocaine and chainsaws. >> this sort of pandering and preferential treatment extends well beyond budweiser. according to brazil's internal revenue service, fifa is getting tax exemptses worth nearly $250 million. other estimates are even higher. why is an organization with a reported reserve of more than $1.4 billion receiving such huge tax ben get fits? well, because fifa is a non-profit organization. and guess what? it's not just fifa, the

international olympic committee committee also has non-profit status. the ioc generated $5 billion in revenue between 2009 and 2012. and right here at home, the ncaa is tax exempt, too. according to bloomberg, its tax breaks on ticket prices alone cost the u.s. treasury $100 million annually in uncollected revenue. it isn't just the amateurs. professional american sports leagues are in on the game as well. amazingly, the national football league, the national hockey league and the pga tour are all non-profits, and thus have tax exempt status. the pga tour generated nearly $1 billion in revenue in 2011. the nhl reported record earnings of $3.1 billion in 2011. and the nfl made $9.2 billion in revenue in 2013, according to forbes. that makes it the most lucrative

league in the entire world. the nfl's commissioner, roger goodell, took home $44 million in 2012. why in the world are these leagues considered non-profits? in september, oklahoma's republican senator, tom coburn, asked just that question. coburn introduced the pro sports act, which would strip professional sports leagues of their federal tax exemption if they earn more than $10 million. the nfl obviously makes much more than that, but to be clear, the organization does point out that only the league office is tax exempt. 392 member teams do pay taxes on their income. but the chances that coburn's bill will pass are slim to none. if you want to know just how powerful these legs are, listen to this. this week, the "minneapolis star tribune" published what it said was a confidential list of demands provided by sources, demands that the city had to

meet in order for the nfl to award minneapolis the 2018 super bowl. the star tribune said the nfl and the super bowl host committee declined to comment on the document. the leaked document was 153 pages and it requests, among other things, all travel costs for 180 league officials to take a familiarization trip before the game, police escorts for all team owners, as if they are heads of state or something. and, of course, exemptions from city i county and state taxes. this on top of the massive subsidy already in place. minneapolis taxpayers forked over nearly $1 billion in public funds to help build a new stadium for the game. this is worse than crony capitalism. it's chromeny socialism. the nfl, fifa, the ioc, are all large, multibillion dollar global organizations that make their decisions mostly to maximize their revenues.

there's nothing wrong with that but there is a word to describe them, businesses. and they shouldn't be exempt from the rules, regulations and taxes that other businesses around the world have to pay. next on "gps," eric cantor's downfall means the death of any hope of immigration reform in congress. what does that mean for the u.s. economy? how about mexico? let's get the perspective from there. i will talk to mexico's finance minister. because my dentures fit well. before those little pieces would get in between my dentures and my gum and it was uncomfortable. even well-fitting dentures let in food particles. super poligrip is zinc free. with just a few dabs, it's clinically proven to seal out more food particles so you're more comfortable and confident while you eat. so it's not about keeping my dentures in, it's about keeping the food particles out. [ charlie ] try zinc free super poligrip.

♪ ♪fame, makes a man take things over♪ ♪fame, lets him loose, hard to swallow♪ ♪fame, puts you there where things are hollow♪ the evolution of luxury continues. the next generation 2015 escalade. ♪fame

the news on tuesday night shocked the united states. house majority leader, eric cantor, one of the most powerful republicans in the land, have been defeated in the primary by a tea party candidate, a man to the right of cantor politically. the strongest attacks against eric cantor were on the issue of immigration reform. cantor had come out in favor of legal status for the children of undocumented immigrants, just the children. now the topic is radioactive and any hope of an immigration reform bill passing congress is dead. what does this mean for the united states and as importantly, what does it mean for its key neighbor?

joining me now is mexico's finance minister, luis vittere. their for being on. >> thank you. such a pleasure. >> who do you think of this situation? >> i think it's surprising. this is not a mexico issue, this is a u.s. issue. we under it that way. do you look at it with some puzzlement? because as you know, net mexican immigration to the united states over the laugh year or two, has been essentially zero. >> that's a fact that's little known in the u.s. but it's a very important fact. in past years, the migration was positive into the u.s., but in the past four years, the net migration has been zero. that means the number of mexicans coming to the u.s. is about the same that the number of people coming to the u.s. into mexico. what is increasing is not the flow of people but the flow of goods and services.

every year, we have -- we have an increasing amount of trade. we do $1 million of trade per minute between mexico and the u.s. we have 1 million crossings of the border legally every day. that means that the integration of these two economies is happening regardless of what people say in washington or in mexico city. just -- it makes so much sense to have value changed linked, produce things together as we do in the auto industry for every dollar we export to the rest of the world. u.s. content and production. >> explain that again for a second. every dollar that mexico exports, 30 crepts of that dollar is something that you bought in america? >> you bought in america. >> every time we export america is exporting with us. it happens on the u.s. exports, because many components coming from mexico.

>> why do you think the mexican immigration to the united states has stopped, or at you say, the number of people coming from mexico to the u.s. is equal to the number of people going from the u.s. to mexico. net migration is zero. is that because -- there are enough good-paying jobs in mexico? is that because of the u.s. recession? when your economy starts growing even faster, will the old pattern re-emerge and you'll see more mexicans coming across the border? >> that's quite unlikely. a u.s. recovery will mean more jobs in mexico, and better paying jobs in mexico. it's not at all projected for these to change. in fact we expend this trend to continue. >> in a sense, in washington, we're fighting yesterday's war. in other words, there isn't going to be a big problem of mexican migration into the u.s. in the future. >> certainly not.

future with the lens of the past. immigration will be more about students coming to the u.s. even u.s. students going to mexico to learn spanish and get different skills. will be of high qualified workers, either u.s. coming into mexico or mexicans going to the u.s. remember, there are already over 1 million u.s. citizens live in mexico and they are doing jobs throughout the country, they are being quite productive. some people are retiring into mexico and that's going to grow as well. >> while we have this conversation about bashing mexico or electrified fences, people like george schultz, ronald reagan's secretary of state, richard nixon's secretary of treasury, george schultz says the real conversation we should be having is how we have freer movement of people from the u.s. to mexico and mexico to the u.s. to deepen the immigration between these two countries. do you think that's even possible? >> let me show you something

where we have more attention, which is infrastructure and the border. as i said, this is a very active border. trade doubled since october, the best 20 years and we haven't invested the side of the border anything substantial to improve the crossings, so the queues are getting longer, wait times are getting longer and these are the kind of things we should be focusing on much how can we be sure something that is produced in -- within mexico, then goes to a factory in north carolina, and -- that it would be exported to europe. how can we streamline that process to make it more productive, more competitive for both countries? that means infrastructure. that means logistics, that's where the focus of mexican relationships should be on. >> we should been planning for the opportunities, not the problems. >> i perceive the u.s. government is focusing strongly on that, so as we. >> pleasure to have you on.

>> thank you, fareed, such an honor. up next, if watching the world cup you see pictures of the slums of rio and wince, my next guest will give us the case for slums and he's a harvard professor. on my count. the one where you step up and save the day? make it happen. (crowd) oh no... introducing verizon xlte. hey guys, i got it right here! we've doubled our 4g lte bandwidth in cities coast to coast. so take on more. with xlte. for best results, use verizon.

peace of mind is important when so we provide it services you bucan rely on. with centurylink as your trusted it partner, you'll experience reliable uptime for the network and services you depend on.

multi-layered security solutions keep your information safe, and secure. and responsive dedicated support meets your needs, and eases your mind. centurylink. your link to what's next. add vanishing deductible from nationwide insurance and get $100 off for every year of safe driving. we put members first. join the nation. ♪ nationwide is on your side

slums, waste, idol hands of abject poverty. my next guest spent a lot of time studying some these places, particularly the flavellas like those spotlighted in brazil. he sees the bright side to slums. ed rozier studies slums. you have a chapter called, "what's good about slums." when you look at those slums in brazil, in india, what are we missing? >> we're missing the alternative. while we would never want to spend a week or month of our lives in these slums, the people who come there are not fools, they are moving places that are far worse. it gives them the ability to find a future.

yes, they're hellish by the standards that we're used but not more hellish than the rural arias of brazil. there's more in the city than in unproductive farmland. >> not that people in slums are poor, but cities attract poor people because they want to stop being poor? >> absolutely. urban poverty is more of a sign of urban strength than weakness. cities don't make people poor, at least not most of the time. cities attract poor people with a promise of a better life, with the ability to get around without a car. my own work together with matthew khan of ucla found that poverty rates go up in the united states near new subway stops. that doesn't mean the cities are impovrishing people, but subway stops attract people that aren't

able to afford the lifestyle of american suburbia. >> when we look at those things in flavellas, there's an enormous amount of economic activity going on there. it's all informal. nobody pays any taxes. you know, is that something that one should celebrate? >> i think so. i mean, i think there are things also to hate about slums, certainly. i think the first order of things when i walk through a place like deravi, which is a magical place filled with enormous energy of indian talent. there's a guy sewing brassieres and you think you're in the lower side of manhattan in 1905. and across the street, there's recycling of boxes, there's a ceramics potter making ceramics, and there are people recycling plastics. all sorts of things, where do they come up with this? and even though there are some places of opportunity, they are and that makes the mega cities liveable and humane.

>> what are the solutions to american cities when you look at something like detroit, what do you think -- what went wrong? how can you fix it? >> well, above all, it's just enormous headwinds of economic change. its age has come and gone. in some sense these great factories were at odds with the successful cities. they are marked by three things. smart people, small firms, and connections to the outside world. actually, the same three things were great during the time of alexander hamilton. smart people are able to use the density to learn from one another and, of course, connections to the outside world is what detroit is all about. you had factories from the outside world and when cost

conditions change for a location across the ocean and the cities didn't reinvent themselves, you ask which cities in america have been able to come back. it's education above all. it's human and they looked at reinventing and structures and what detroit was a city built from 1.85 million people and less than half of that amount. and people with monorail glided over city streets. >> so tell the city of the food truck and part of this clause i ended up on a radio program several years ago with a poor

woman who was trying to start a food truck for 18 months and had been facing regulatory barriers at every turn. >> in detroit of all places. >> right. the idea that detroit should be saying no to any entrepreneur who wants to get started there seems mind boggling. but the degree of pragmatism said, look, the food truck will never catch and one model towards freedom. >> pleasure to have you on. >> pleasure to be on. up next, the new military chief in thailand has an unlikely message for its people. let's just say, he seems to have been inspired by pharrell. kid: do you pay him? dad: of course. kid: how much? dad: i don't know exactly. kid: what if you're not happy? does he have to pay you back? dad: nope. kid: why not? dad: it doesn't work that way. kid: why not? vo: are you asking enough questions

about the way your wealth is managed? wealth management at charles schwab.

. the world cup kickoff brings me to my question of the week. what country is making its world cup debut this year? bosnia, moldova, singapore, or south sudan? we'll tell you the answer. stay tuned. if you love the show, don't forget to dvr or tivo the show

so you never miss the information. this week's book is "the forever war" by dexter filkins. his writing is not opinionated or policy-oriented. he just takes you inside the war, the occupation, the ins insurgency. now for the last look. the thailand national team may not be in the world cup but thanks to the military government after the recent coup, they will be able to watch the world cup for free. since then they have cracked down on protests and detained critics. despite all this, they also have a message for the thai people. be happy and free broadcasts of all 64 world cup games is just part of the attempt to return happiness to the people. they are also giving away movie tickets, throwing free concerts

in bangkok with singing soldiers and scantily clad women and even brought horses with bales of hey downtown. he wants to return happiness to thailand. so much so, that he wrote a ballot about it. ♪ >> it's set to music by the royal thai army band and has more than 200,000 hits on youtube. ♪ with lyrics like "we offer to guard and protect you with our hearts and to bring back love, how long will it take, please will you wait," it's not as catchy at the other "happy"

song. ♪ the correct answer to our gps challenge is a. bosnia was formed in 1992 after the breakup of yugoslavia and is one of the smallest countries with the team in the world cup this year. while the unemployment rate is high and gdp stagnant, the nation is trying to integrate itself into organizations like the european union and the world trading organization. it may be an underdog but it does have a world class striker, the second highest scorer in the european qualifying matches. best of luck in the first ever world cup match against argentina tonight. thanks to all of you for being part of my program this week. i will see you next week. hello.

i'm fredricka whitfield. happy father's day to dads across the country. a look at our top stories at this hour. a legendary radio voice falls silent. >> will this be the seventh week at number one? i'm casey kasem and here we go. >> dead at the age of 82, a look at his decade long career and the family feud that boiled over in his final days. also, chilling images out of iraq as militants claim they have executed dozens of iraqi soldiers and providing pictures, they say, is proof. we'll take you live to baghdad. and the mother of one of three israeli teams abducted in the west bank now speaking out asking for prayers. israel's prime minister blames hamas but what is hamas

saying? we'll go to israel for the latest on the search. we begin with the man whose career and voice were both known as legendary around the world. casey kasem has died at the age of 82. he had been suffering from dementia and had been hospitalized in washington state and his daughter was given the authority to have doctors end his infusion of water, food, and medicine. kasem had said he would not want to be kept alive if it resulted in a mere biological existence. many are reflecting on his life and music. nischelle turner has more on the man that some call the world's best radio host. >> reporter: radio personality casey kasem was best known as