one a day men's 50+ is a complete multivitamin designed for men's health concerns as we age. with 7 antioxidants to support cell health. one a day men's 50 plus. trials in recent memory. we are expecting a vermont here in the high profile oscar pistorius case in the coming hours. we'll get you live to the courtroom as soon as proceedings get under way. also, the cia offering an alarming assessment of exactly how many isis fighters are out there, just hours after the u.s. president laid out a plan to destroy the terror group. we'll go live to baghdad. welcome once again to those of you watching in the u.s. and around the world. i'm errol barnett. >> and i'm a natalie allen.

he's clear a murderer, but oscar pistorius is due to arrive at court any moment to hear if he's guilty of anything. >> you're looking at live pictures here. it's now 9:00 a.m. in pretoria, south africa. the judge will continue reading her verdict in this case. it was this time yesterday she found him not guilty on murder charges but said his actions were negligent. >> experts say that is a hint she will find him guilty of culpable homicide. he also faces three weapons charges. again, we'll be live outside the courtroom in a moment. these are live pictures of people gathered there at the door where he will enter con. but first, cnn's robin kurnow recaps thursday's session. >> the accused cannot be found guilty of murder. >> reporter: not guilty of murder, but still not free to

go. oscar pistorius sobbed and heaved, looking exhausted and broken. >> relationships are dynamic and unpredictable. >> reporter: the judge calmly explained why she thought the state did not prove he intended to kill his girlfriend, reeva steenkamp. >> the stale clearly has not proved beyond a reasonable doubt that the accused is guilty of premeditated murder. >> reporter: the judge threw out much of the state's case against pistorius, but found his actions that night and on the witness stand questionable. >> what we are dealing with here is the fact that the accused was, amongst other things, an evasive witness. he failed to listen properly to questions put to him and the cross-examination, giving an impression that he was more worried. >> reporter: just before the judge adjourned for the day, she said pistorius had time to act

"reasonably, without firing four shots into the toilet cubicle." >> i am of the view that the accused acted too hastily and used excessive force. in the second sense, it is clear that his conduct was negligent. >> reporter: experts say it points to a possible conviction of culpable homicide or manslaughter. >> legally he has to be convicted of culpable homicide because the judge found he failed the reasonable man test. a reasonable man would have for seen someone would be killed by shooting into that toilet. >> reporter: pistorius exited through a gauntlet of fating photograph evers. friday, he'll make the same walk again. robin kurnow, cnn, south africa. >> that was yesterday.

but what to expect today. kelly phelps joins us once again from outside the courthouse. kelly, what can we expect from the judge here in this next hour? >> well, firstly she needs to begin deliberating on the remaining firearms charges that are left. and then, of course, we need to see her put in all of the charges to mr. pistorius and reading out whether he is guilty or not guilty on those charges. that is likely to belie lly to dramatic moment in the courtroom. >> we expect oscar pistorius to arrive there, kelly. what has been the mood outside the courthouse among south africans watch thing trial? we already discussed is oscar pistorius getting better or worse treatment because he's a celebrity. what is the mood there now? >> i think south africans have

been completely engrossed in this trial. the mood outside the courtroom really reflects that, and it certainly is apparent in the quite extraordinary media presence that is visible today. even more than yesterday. the pavements around the courthouse are brimming with the world's press. people have been hanging on every word in this country of the judge's judgment. >> we're watching right now as oscar pistorius steps inch by inch, getting through those crowds, through that throng of media to head inside the courtroom where he's going to find out in about 25 minutes what the judge has decided on his culpable homicide charge and now these weapons charges. what is the range of what the judge may decide as far as what she's able to charge him with? >> in terms of sentencing on the available charges that remain

that he's yet to be i quitted of, it can change from a severe prison term to no prison time at all. it's entirely in the judge's hands. the gun charges carry quite a heavy sentence, as well. two of them have a maximum of no more than five years and the possession of ammunition charge, no more than 15 years. having said that, it's unlikely he would get near the maximum of those charges, because those are meant for the most serious versions of those offenses. with the illegal possession of ammunition charge, you're looking at where a person is stockpiling holds of illegal ammunition, trying to execute a plot to overthrow the state. so it's unlikely that someone like pistorius would get 15 years in prison for that. but she does have at her disposal some harsh potential

sentences. so he will no doubt be sitting with much anticipation waiting to see how she decides on those matters. >> and he became more and more unraveled yesterday as the hours ticked on. we are now waiting for the judge to begin explaining percent ten -- her sentencing. we do expect things to get under way in about 20 minutes. we'll bring that live as soon as it happens. coming up here, the battle against isis in iraq and syria. it's making for some unexpected alliances with some very uncertain risks. we'll go live to baghdad for the latest.

welcome back. other stories we are following. australia's prime minister in the past hour and a half, has said that his government has now raised its terror threat level. >> it's gone from medium alert to high alert now for the first time in a decade. that means a terrorist attack is considered likely. tony abbott spoke to reporters. >> last night, the director general of security, david irvine, raised the terror threat to high. consequently today, the government is raising the public alert level to high.

i want to stress that this does not mean that a terror attack is imminent. we have no specific intelligence of particular plots. what we do have is intelligence that there are people with the intent and the capability to mount attacks. >> the cia has issued a stunning new estimate on the strength of isis in iraq and syria. the group may now be able to rally more than 31,000 fighters. that's about triple from last year. it reflects a recruiting boom driven by battlefield success and the declaration of an islamic state. a cia source tells cnn the new figure includes more than 15,000 foreign fighters. at least 2,000 of them from western nations. >> these new figures follow the

president's announcement that a coalition will seek out and destroy isis wherever it is. here's more now from washington. >> reporter: the fight against isis is the latest chapter a long american war against islamic extremists. but it brings its own particular challenges. each of them problems that had kept the president from launching a broad campaign until now. with military action inside syria, the u.s. is plunging itself into a brutal and confusing civil war. isis is the enemy today. but so is isis' chief rival. bashar al assad. america's allies on the ground, both in syria, the moderate syrian rebels, and in iraq, the iraqi army, are unproven fighting forces. neither has made any significant headway against isis on its own. >> the moderate rebels in the past haven't been proven to be a cohesive fighting unit.

in many cases, they earl not very moderate. sometimes they make league with groups like al nusra. >> reporter: and the president is sending an additional 475 u.s. military advisers to iraq, raising the total number of u.s. force there is to 1700. they won't be in combat, but they will face risk. in the air and on the ground. and the president's pledge to limit that risk by ruling out a combat role greatly limits the effectiveness of air strikes. >> an air campaign can be highly effective if you have targeters on the ground embedded with the combat units. >> reporter: on the home front, military action many believe will last years will cost billions of dollars. disrupting, if not destroying the president's attempt to shrink the pentagon budget. >> it will be up to congress to come up with the resources to make sure that the u.s. military

is not incumbered by lack of resources. >> reporter: at steak, u.s. security at home and abroad. estimates are isis has anywhere from 20,000 to 31,500 fighters, including 2,000 westerners. among them, about a dozen americans. the fear, that those western fighters are being endo you remembered to carry out terror attacks when they return home. a u.s. official tells cnn that u.s. surveillance aircraft are now flying over syria. this to father intelligence for the air strikes that the president has ordered against isis. jim sciutto, cnn, washington. >> the u.s. says the campaign against isis will be a coalition effort and now even syria says it is willing to cooperate with the assad government embroiled in a three-year civil war. isis has taken control across

eastern syria. and while syria may be open to certain air strikes, a government official says they must be coordinated with damascus. >> the strategy that i read by obama, it needs a lot to be desired. he will benefit a lot to cooperate with the syrian government against terrorism, because we are been fighting terrorism for the past four years. our foreign minister made it clear that we are ready for cooperate, but if any strike is done without our cooperation, we will consider it an aggression. >> the president of france has now arrived in iraq, offering his support to iraqi leaders as they battle isis militants. we're joined now live from baghdad with more on his visit with us.

>> reporter: natalie, president hollande is the first head of state to arrive here in iraq in a step to endorse this newly formed, inclusive government. he's also here ahead of the paris summit that is supposed to take place on monday for international and regional partners are going to be meeting to discuss the isis threat, to discuss how they can work together to fight isis, to support iraq. we heard him speak a short time ago with the iraqi president. he congratulated the iraqi people on this government that he described as democratic and inclusive and said that'sis threat is not just a threat to iraq. it is a threat to all. and that is the international community here has a big part to play. he said there would be a coordination of efforts between iraq and the international community, not just militarily.

also supporting iraq when it comes to humanitarian aid and whatever help it needs in fighting isis. really, natalie, here another message. this is something where you get the sense in iraq, officials here feeling final lit the world is really waking up to the threat of isis. iraqis have felt that over the past year or more, they have really been fighting this battle on behalf of the world on their own. now they're seeing more support. president obama now president hollande also supporting them. so these efforts, the international and regional efforts coming together. now they want to see this really translated from words into actions. >> right. and actions against quite a force that we're hering about. cia releasing new numbers on just how big they have grown and how quickly.

hollande is arriving at this time when the world is learning what they're probably going to be up against. >> reporter: absolutely. and these figures, natalie, are similar to figures we have heard from iraqi officials here. iraq's former national security adviser, who really was focused on al qaeda in iraq when that was the threat prior to isis. i spoke to him yesterday about the differences, what he's seeing in figures and foreign fighters, how different the threat is. he said it's a much, much larger threat right now, because it is on a larger scale more horrific scale. in terms of figures, they believe he says estimates here in iraq is about 70% of the isis fighters are made up of locals, iraqis and syrians, and the rest is foreign fighters. he said there's been a real surge in numbers, similar to what we're hearing the cia say.

he said in june when we saw isis really shocking the world by how that iraqi military crumbled and it basically picked up mosul, took over iraq's second largest city, that really helped them here in recruiting and adding more to their ranks. this is where iraqi officials say, more needs to be done on the international level, because they believe as soon as -- they describe it as the former national security adviser described it, you're pressing them here in iraq and in syria, they're going to go back to different countries. no one is immune, that's why there needs to be more done and more cooperation between the countries to cut off what he described as that oxygen to this group, which is their funding and the foreign fighter flow that we see across the boarders. so very important here. we're seeing secretary kerry trying to rally more of the regional coordination.

cannot tell you how important this is for iraqi officials. they say it will be key in trying to fight isis. >> it will be interesting to see how that coordination all comes together. thank you. still to come for you here on cnn -- >> america marks 13 years since the worst terror attack in u.s. history. and the death toll is climbing in pakistan as officials warn of the worst of these floods is yet to come. we'll have more after this break. every day, people fall. from a simple misstep, to tripping over a rug, to just losing their balance. and not being able to get up from a fall can have serious, lifetime consequences. important. epared is philips lifeline with autoe than just a medical alert button. it's an advanced fall detection system designed to get you help quickly. if you fall and you're unable to push your button, the fall detection technology within technology within

place a call for help. our us-based staff will make sure you get the help you need right away. this is philips lifeline. we received a fall-detected signal. do you need help? call now about philips lifeline with autoalert, the only button with philips' advanced fall detection technology. we'll send you this free information kit about the importance of getting help quickly, should you happen to fall. n't press the button. i blacked out. and so having lifeline with autoalert really saved me. if they don't push the button, they're not able to push the button, it takes over and gets them the help that they need. multiple sensors inside autoalert can recognize the differences between your everyday movements and a fall. so if a fall does happen, and you're unable to push your button, autoalert can detect it and automatically place a call for help. autoalert is comfortable yet discreet, so you can wear it at all times. and because it's waterproof, you can even wear it in the shower or bathtub where many serious falls happen. over seven million people have benefitted from

the lifeline service. no wonder it's recommended by over 100,000 healthcare professionals nationwide. now is the time to be prepared. sooner or later, everyone falls. make sure you have autoalert before it happens. if you or someone you love would like information about philips lifeline with autoalert, call now for your free information kit and ask about free activation when you order. back to school shopping that's just not enough crotch. do these shoes say "mathlete" to you? ha! where do you put the books?! these are still cool, right? number 15 of my 20, desperately trying to keep my girls from growing up too fast. the new amex everyday credit card with no annual fee. make 20 or more purchases in a monthly billing period and earn 20% more rewards. is this nut-free? it's membership that rewards you for the things you already buy, every day.

what's your 20? 13 years ago today, at 9:37 a.m., the pentagon was attacked. please join us in observing a moment of silence to remember those who perished. >> americans on thursday marked the 13th anniversary of the 9/11 terror attacks. speaking at the pentagon, u.s. president barack obama said america stands tall and proud despite "the small and hateful minds that conspired to break us." [ bell tolls ] meantime, in new york, bells rang out at the precise moments when each of the planes hijacked by al qaeda crashed into the world trade center, and an honor guard marked the moments when each of the twin towers crumbled to the ground. there at ground zero, relatives read out the names of the nearly

3,000 people who were killed some 13 years ago. >> it's amazing, when they made those names, it is still chilling and heartbreaking. >> and the impact that it's had throughout the world. the pakistani army is working to rescue thousands of people in the path of dangerous flood waters. >> you've got to see this footage here. many people had to be rescued by helicopter, because they live in regions just too remote to access by boat. more than 400 people killed in floods across india and pakistan. and hundreds of thousands more forced to evacuate their homes. ivan cabrera brings us more on what are still rising waters there. >> rising waters and the people that have been rescued are in much better shape than the ones still waiting. extremely hot temperatures and a lack of food and water. so time is running out for some

of them here. the army is working as past as they can to get these people out. in the north, we have had people marooned as a result of the rivers expanding to where they look like lakes. what precipitated this was the 15 inches of rain we got in a couple of days coming down the mountainside. and then all of that water has run off into the rivers and now we're dealing with that part of the story and we continue to follow this crest with over 12 million people in its path. so we continue with that problem. it's interesting, because some of the areas that did not get the rainfall will still get the flooding because the crest is flooding. projected crest over the weekend now moves into the river away from the tributaries and away from the areas hardest hit. but we continue to see problems.

people needing to get back to where they lived and not being able to do so because infrastructure is just not there. so here on saturday with a warning. further down the pike through monday and wednesday and into next week, we continue with this problem here and the flooding will continue, although at this point here, we are able to get people out of the way that lived near the river as a result of the fact that well, we can follow the crest forecast here. it's now rain coming out of the sky at this point. the river has to drain and it has to get to the arabian sea. we're going to be talking about additional flooding impacting a lot more villages to the north. to indeed, disaster going on up there. it's going to be a while before real recovery can take hold.

>> thanks so much. still to come, breaking news coverage from south africa where oscar pistorius is about to hear the verdict in his trial for killing reeva steenkamp. q.

welcome back to our viewers in the u.s. and around the world. you're watching cnn and i'm natalie allen. >> and i'm errol barnett. our top story this hour takes us to south africa. the judge there about to resume handing her verdict in the oscar pistorius trial. >> yes. here's where things stand right now. pistorius was cleared of the most serious charge against him on thursday, murder. the judge said the state failed to prove the athlete intended to

kill his then girlfriend reeva steenkamp. >> today, what will we see? yesterday the judge said pistorius was negligent on the night of her death. that suggests she will find him guilty of culpable homicide. he also faces three weapons charges. >> let's go live to south africa with kelly phelps that joins us from outside the courthouse, where you have been throughout this. kelly, with the hint well got from the judge yesterday, we're about to start here any moment now. so we'll go to it when the judge arrives. but what do we expect to hear from this judge? >> we certainly expect to hear a conviction of culpable homicide and she needs to consider all the evidence on the record that pertains to the three gun charges. each of those can potentially carry a prison sentence, as well. so he'll no doubt be filled with

anticipation, mr. pistorius, in awaiting to hear his fate with respect to those charges. >> if she does find him dpilty wi -- guilty of the gun charges and the culpable homicide, is it probable he will spend time behind bars? >> it's difficult to classify it as probable. it's all about individualizing the process. so taking this specific case and this specific offender into account, and then applying the sentencing law and principles to those circumstances to reach what's considered to be a fair and appropriately severe sentence, that's certainly a significant chance he could. other cases have resulted in prison terms of about eight years. there have been examples of cases with facts similar to pistorius' case, but offenders with different characteristics, who have got five years, but the

sentence has been fully suspended. so in essence, you get an opportunity to stay outside of jail. but if you default on those conditions, it's immediately revoked and you need to serve out the rest of your prison sentence. so there's quite a diversity of options available to her. she has a lot of flexibility in crafting what she believes to be an individualized and fair and just sentence to match both the seriousness of the offense, but also the culpability of pistorius himself. >> our cnn legal analyst kelliy phelps outside the courthouse. we are standing by for what we understand will be the final day of this. kelly, if you can still hear me, just verify that. will everything wrap up today? and if it does, how likely might an appeal by the state be?

>> i think it is very likely, almost certain to wrap up today. she got through a lot of her judgment yesterday. there is a significant chance that there could be an appeal. from the state's perspective, they clearly seemed dissatisfied with which the judge applied the law. the state is allowed to appeal on matters of law. so they may a appeal the verdict on that count. however, the defense is allowed to appeal both conviction and sentence. so they may wait to consider the grounds of their appeal for the sentencing hearing. sentencing occurs separate from the trial, so it will be days and weeks before the sentencing mini trial occurs. both sides get the opportunity to put aggravating and

mitigating factors in evidence before the court to persuade her to issue the sentence that they believe is most appropriate in the circumstances of this case. so the defense may wait for that point and the state may choose to appeal on law. >> kelly, thank you very much. the judge has entered the courtroom. the proceedings are now getting under way. let's listen in. >> we are now dealing with count two.

the summary of the evidence of substantial facts and terms of section 1443-a of act 51 of 1977 reads as follows -- in january 2013, the accused, while having lunch with friends at a restaurant in johannesburg, handed the firearm of one of his friends and a shot was discharged. this shot narrowly missed his friend and hit the floor of the restaurant. the friend referred to in this paragraph is kevin. the state called two witnesses to prove this count.

samantha taylor. i would like to rephrase, i'm now talking about count three. >> i would like to rephrase, i'm talking about count two, instead of count three. the summary of facts -- on a separate occasion, on 20 september 2010, the accused, who is the licensed owner of a 9 millimeter pistol, fired the shot through the sunroof of a

car while traveling on a public road. there were other passengers in that car. the state called two witnesses for this count. namely samantha taylor, former girlfriend of the accused, and darren frisco, who is a friend of the accused. both these witnesses were present in the vehicle when the incident referred to in this count occurred. ms. taylor's evidence briefry was that she, darren and the accused were returning from a visit one afternoon, when the vehicle it that were traveling in was stopped by traffic officers for speeding. fresco was the driver at the time, while the traffic officer was writing an infringement ticket, the accused, who occupied the front passenger seat, stepped out of the vehicle to see what was happening with

fresco. a second officer had in the meantime walked to the front passenger seat where the accused had left his firearm. the officer picked it up, asking whose it was and where the onlier -- and whether the owner had a license, and in the process ejected a bullet into the vehicle. the accused returned and had a verbal altercation with the officer. after they searched for and found the bullet, they left the scene. both the accused and fresco who was still driving, were irritated by the officers and minutes later they joked about whether they should or should not shoot. the accused took his firearm and shot through the open sunroof of

the vehicle. both laughed about the incident. ms. taylor could not say where the incident happened as she was not familiar with the vicinity. mr. fresco confirmed that the incident took place, although his version was very different. he, the accused, and ms. taylor war traveling in one vehicle on their way from an outing. he was the driver. the accused sat in the front passenger seat while ms. taylor occupied the back seat. he confirmed that they were stopped by traffic officers twice. once for speeding. he was asked by the officer to step outside, which he did.

and while the officer was writing him a ticket, the accused left his seat to join him. another officer went to the front passenger seat where he found the accused's firearm, picked it up, and ejected the bullet in the process. this action irritated the accused, who rebuked the officer for handling "another man's firearm." he told the officer that his fingerprints were all over the firearm and if anything were to happen, he, the officer, would be held responsible. they left the scene soon thereafter without warning the accused took out his firearm and fired a shot in the air through

the open sunroof. fresco asked the accused what he was doing, but he laughed at him. he denied that the incident happened in the manner described by taylor. his version is that he was very angry at what the accused had done, as his left ear was left bleeding as a result. the accused denied he had said anything to the officer about fingerprints on the firearm. he stated that he had explained to the officer that he had left the firearm on the seat, simply because he did not want to approach a police officer with a firearm on him. the police officer who had ejected the bullet from his firearm was the one who was

irritated and not him. the accused also denied that he fired a shot through the open sunroof. the assessment of the evidence, if respect to count two, it was pointed out by counsel for the accused that taylor and fresco contradicted each other regarding the allegation that the accused fired a shot through the sunroof of the vehicle.

for that reason, none of the evidence left by the state in this regard was reliable, it was argued. on the other hand, the state counsel disagreed, submitting that there was no reason why fresco or taylor would want to falsely implicate the accused. to deal with the submissions, it is necessary to scrutinize the evidence of the two witnesses. both fresco and taylor gave evidence implicating the accused. they both said that on their way from the outing, the accused fired a shot through the sunroof while the vehicle was moving. however, there the similarities ended. they were both there with the accused at the time of the

incident. yet their version on where the incident happened, how it happened, and why it happened are so dissimilar that one may be tempted to think that they were in fact talking about different incidents. i shall proceed with each of these witnesses. fresco was not an impressive witness at all. when he gave evidence regarding this count. in fact, he was proved to be a dishonest witness. he gave evidence that on their way to -- on the day of the incident, the accused had driven the vehicle at a speed in excess of 200 kilometers per hour, and alleged that he had taken a photograph of the speedometer at

the time. but he is the one that drove at an excessive speed of 260 kilometers per hour and there was an image captured on his phone to prove it. the fact of those lies must not be misunderstood. mendacity on one aspect of a witness' evidence does not necessarily mean that the rest of the evidence will be tainted. it simply means that caution is warranted. in this case, however, there is more reason for the exercise of caution. firstly, fresco could not with certainly say where the incident happened. during evidence in chief, he stated that he was able to point out the specific spot where the

incident had happened to the police. and made reference to what was repeated in photographs 1143 to 1146. under cross-examination, however, he stated that when he was taken to the scene to point out the exact spot where the insurance de incident happened, he was able to point it out only after the captain had driven past the location, on no less than four occasions. secondly, he told an unlikely story that while they were driving back, after their vehicle had been stopped by police, the accused, who was a passenger at the time, without any warning, had fired a shot through the sunroof.

when he asked him what he was doing, he just laughed at him. taylor was a former girlfriend of the accused. it is common cause that the relationship between the two did not end amicably. taylor alleged that the relationship ended when the accused was unfaithful to her. the accused also made a similar counteraccusation. it was clear from the evidence of taylor that she had been hurt by the way in which the relationship had terminated. the above, however, does not necessarily mean she was out to falsely implicate the accused. it simply means, like the evidence of fresco, taylor's evidence needs to be approached with a certain degree of caution and this court has certainly

done that. according to taylor, after the three of them had left the place where their vehicle had been stopped by metro police, fresco and the accused laughed and they said they wanted to shoot and "then oscar shot a bullet out of the sunroof." unlike fresco's version that without saying anything, out of the blue, the accused simply shot out of the sunroof. taylor's version has a ring of truth. in a criminal case, however, that is never the end of the matter. the question is always what the state has proved its case against the accused beyond a reasonable doubt.

the accused denied the incident. defense counsel correctly stated that even if it were to be found, that the accused was a poor witness, that fact would not assist the state case as the court would then be faced with three poor witnesses. this court does not have to believe the accused version. he bears no onus to prove his innocence. rather, it is the state which has to persuade this court that the accused is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of the crime with which he's been charged. the state witnesses contradicted each other on crucial aspects, namely the circumstances under

which the shot was fired. when and where exactly the shot was fired. the evidence placed before this court falls short of the required standard for a conviction in a criminal matter. this court's conclusion is that the state has failed to establish that the accused is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of this count, and has to be acquitted. i'm now dealing with count three, pair photograph 7 of the

summary of substantial facts in terms of section 1443-a of act 52 of 1977 reads as follows -- in january 2013, the accused, while having lunch with friends at a restaurant in johannesburg, handled a firearm of one of his friends and a shot was discharged. this shot narrowly missed his friend and hit the floor of the restaurant. the friend that is being referred to in this case is kevin lavina. it is not in dispute that the firearm, a glock pistol which belonged to fresco, discharged while in the possession of the

accused. kevin, a boxer, gave evidence that he heard fresco tell the accused that there was "one up" meaning there was a bullet in the chamber. within seconds, the firearm was discharged. the shot damaged the floor very close to him and his toe was injured by shrapnel. however, the accused was concerned at that moment that someone might have been hurt, and apologized. he asked if everyone was fine. he then asked fresco to take the blame for what happened, as he wanted to avoid bad publicity in the media. fresco, in his evidence,

confirmed that the accused had asked to see his firearm. he confirmed that he also past it on to him under the table. that as he did so, he told the accused that there was one up, that the accused took the firearm and that soon thereafter the firearm discharged. fresco also confirmed that the accused asked him to take the blame for the discharge of the firearm. when the owners approached the table to seek an explanation, he told them that his firearm had discharged when it got caught in the leg of the table and fell onto the floor. mr. lopez, the owner of the restaurant, gave evidence that on the day of the incident, the

restaurant was full with approximately 220 patrons. it was lunchtime at the time and busy with patrons when he heard a loud bang that sounded like a gun shot. when he went to investigate, fresco apologized and told him that his firearm had accidently fallen off his trouser. soon thereafter, the group paid the bill. the accused and those in his company apologized and left. the accused admitted that he took the firearm from fresco after he had asked for it. he had wanted to see it as he was planning to buy a similar model. his version was that at the time he took it, he did not realize that the firearm was loaded.

or that it had a magazine in it. he wanted to make it safe when a shot went off accidently. counsel for the defense explained what might have caused the firearm to discharge. in my view, it really does not matter what caused the firearm to discharge, as that will not assist this court in determining whether the accused -- >> you've been watching live coverage of the oscar pistorius verdict. i'm natalie allen. >> and i'm errol barnett. oscar pistorius there now acquitted of one of the gun charges. much more to go. for those of you in the u.s., "early start" is next. for everyone else, coverage continues.

breaking news this morning. prison escape. a notorious teenage killer, a school shooter, sets off a manhunt. how does someone killing three classmates manage to get out of prison? we have latest ahead. happening now. hunting isis in syria. u.s. planes tracking down terrorists as we learn how big the terror group has grown. secretary of state john kerry right now asking other countries to join in the fight. we are live with the latest. happening right now, the ju