we are out of time here on "reliable sources." we we have lots more news on cnn.com, including buzzfeed's interview with president obama. i'll see you right here next week. "state of the union" starts right now. a triple threat to u.s. security. atrocities from isis, a land grab by vladimir putin and washington politics that could shut down the department charged with keeping america safe. this is "state of the union." of this is stun "state of the union." >> announcer: this is cnn breaking news. good morning. i'm dana bash. we begin with the war on isis. jordan carrying out new airstrikes on isis targets inside syria. on the ground there's a tense standoff between the isis fighters and the kurdish

peshmerga in northern iraq. phil black is in erbil. phil, what's the latest there? >> reporter: everything we have seen and been told by front line fighters on the ground suggest that there has been a significant uptick in air strikes on isis positions in and around that isis-controlled city. we were at a distance of some ten miles from the southern gates of mosul. we heard, saw multiple detonations. the sound of fast-moving aircraft overhead was pretty constant. this as kurdish fighters are digging in on the ground and holding defensive lines, a small distance away from that city. that's what they call phase 1 of this operation, to contain isis within that city. phase 2 will be hard. it will be dislodging isis from that city. the kurdish fighters say they'll be ready to take part. the time frame is not yet clear. some u.s. officials suggest it could be as soon as april. kurdish officials think it will be longer than that, but ultimately it comes down to when the iraqi army controlled by the government in baghdad is ready to go. that's no small task. rebuilding, retraining,

remotivating the army. it is the same force that ultimately abandoned mosul when isis first invaded this region, dana. >> no small task. that is an understatement. thank you very much for that report. here in the united states this sunday morning there is deep skepticism over the isis claim that the u.s. hostage, kayla mueller, was actually killed by a jordanian air strike inside syria. a spokesman says her family remains hopeful. cnn's kyung lah is there. >> reporter: everything we've been told by people in touch with the family is that they still do not have confirmation. they do not know the status of their daughter and it is simply agony for the people of this town as well as her family made worse as we learn more about kayla mueller. she is a girl who grew up here. became a very dedicated woman to

social justice. she went to syria to try to help the refugees. i spoke with a professor of hers who was a mentor and that professor says that mueller was very sober about the risk. she knew profoundly what was at stake here. she still went and her family now also is still waiting for word. they've reached out to her captors in a public statement urging them to reach them. >> kyung, thank you for that report. a member of the senate intelligence cumulative committee says there's no reason to think isis is in his words, moving beyond until now have been aspirations to attack the u.s. homeland. as the threat grows, the department of homeland security may shut down in a matter of weeks because congress is blocking its money in a partisan fight over immigration. we're joined now exclusively by the u.s. homeland security secretary, jeh johnson. mr. secretary, thanks for coming in. before we get to that,

i want to ask you what you heard the report about kayla mueller. you heard her say she knew the risks of going into a place like syria. the state department advises u.s. citizens not to do that. given that what should the u.s. responsibility be to go in and get hostages? >> well, obviously we're learning as much as we can as quickly as we can about ms. mueller's situation. our thoughts our prayers, our concerns are with her family right now. you're correct, the state department advises in that particular part of the region right now. it is dangerous. people need to be cautious. we do what we can to ensure the safety of americans who travel. that part of the world right now is obviously a very challenging situation. >> so let's talk about the jihadists overall. americans looking at this looking at the fighting. probably constantly saying how does this affect me how does

this affect the united states. and say why does it matter. john stein beck who is the fbi's counterterrorism division head, told cnn's pam brown about an example about how it should matter. listen to this. >> there are individuals that have been in communication with groups like isil who have a desire to conduct and attack yes. >> that are living in the u.s. right now. >> correct. >> people who are in contact with isil living in the u.s. right now. how many are we talking about? >> dana i would put it this way. we've evolved to a new phase in the global terrorist threat in that 13 years ago we were attacked on 9/11 we had a relatively conventional command and control structure from core al qaeda that would dispatch/deploy operatives to commit terrorist attacks. the situation now is more decentralized, more diffuse and, frankly, more complex in that terrorist organizations such as isil or al qaeda in the iranian

peninsula use the internet use social media to communicate and to inspire acts of terrorism on individuals and countries. for that reason we need be particularly vigilant here at home working with state and local law enforcement, working through the public with campaigns such as if you see something, say something. >> certainly complex. but if i may, could you shed more light on what we just heard? do you have a handle on who the individuals are and how many there are in the united states who are in contact? >> the fbi and the department of homeland security do a pretty good job of tracking the travel of individuals of suspicion, of investigating potential acts of terror or material support to terrorism. just this past friday there were arrests of five individuals who were supplying materials, allegedly, to isil. our agencies do a good job of

tracking individuals and we work with them to track the travel of individuals. >> are we talking about five, 10, 100, 1,000? give us the context of what we're talking about. >> what i can say are this. the numbers that we see are larger in european countries, and that's one of the reasons why we're concerned about travel to and from europe and making sure that we've got the appropriate security assurances from countries for which we do not require a visa. but here at home we do a pretty good job of trashgcking these individuals and we have in a number of instances, arrested people for material support, for attempting to travel to syria, for example. obviously there's an unknown factor, but i believe we have the systems in place to do a pretty good job of tracking these individuals through law enforcement, through travel, through our efforts to monitor what they're doing. >> so people should feel you've got it covered. >> people should be vigilant right now.

>> let's turn to the department of homeland security and the fight that's going on right now that could potentially shut down your department or at least keep funding out of your department. i also want you to look at the calendar so people understand how close we are to the deadline for that happening. it is february 27th. here we are just a little more than two weeks away and we shall note that, by the way, congress is out of town. they're not working for one of those weeks so it makes it incredibly difficult. tell us where things stand right now. it is a standoff over the idea that republicans are trying to push funding this bill along with making sure that the president's executive order on immigration doesn't happen. >> dana, i am on capitol hill now virtually every working day talking to democrats and republicans about the importance of a fully funded department of homeland security in these times in particular.

we're on a continuing resolution right now, which as you point out, expires on february 27th, which is less than 20 days at this point. and as long as we're on a continuing resolution, that in and of itself creates uncertainty about how we go about our homeland security missions. and if we go into government shutdown, for example, that means furloughing employees, furloughing homeland security officials. as craig fugate, the administrator of fema pointed out the other day, if we go into government shutdown he's got to furlough something like 80% of his fema workforce. and so i'm on the hill every day stressing the importance of a fully funded department of homeland security separate and apart from riders to try to defund our efforts to reform the immigration system. if people in congress want to have that debate about immigration reform, let's have

that debate, but don't tie that to funding public safety at homeland security for the american people. we need a fully funded department right now. >> since you mentioned the potential risks, i just also want to point out that in your own contingency plan in 2013 if there were a shutdown then a large percentage of agents and officials would have to come to work without pay. but they have to come to work. is it really going to be that big of a deal to most of your agency to -- when it comes to the risk of this country? >> yes, it is that big of a deal. the department of homeland security interfaces with the american public more than any other department in our government at airports and at ports. to just say, well, we'll just make them come to work without pay, first of all, is a real challenge for the working men and women of my department.

second, it means furloughing at least 30,000 of our department and cutting back very significantly on our operations. our operations to pursue homeland security. this is not a situation to make light of. we fund in excess of $2 million a year in grants to state and local law enforcement, for surveillance equipment. as long as we are on a cr i cannot fund those new initiatives which should be of serious concern to sheriffs police chiefs mayors and governors. >> before i let you go i have to ask you about the secret service which is underneath your department. it seems like every week there is some kind of breach at the white house. this past week we saw what happened with the drones. the secret is now acting without an actual director. how far away are we from your interview process? >> we're not far away. we're taking a serious look at

candidates for permanent director and the president and i recognize that the secret service is the finest protection service in the world but we need significant change in how the agency conducts business. that was one of the findings of the independent panel and i thought that their work was fair and thorough and so we're looking at a new permanent director. i think we'll have one pretty soon. >> as somebody who oversees the secret service, when you hear a drone has landed at the white house, do you say, are you kidding me? again? i mean what is your reaction when you hear this kind of breach? because the public is obviously saying how does this kind of thing happen? >> in the last couple of months we've added security to the white house compound in light of the fence jumping incident. it's important to remember that securing the white house compound and the protection of the first family and other national leaders is a balance between providing for their physical safety but we live in

a democracy where people want transparency they want access to their national leaders. and the buildings and the structures of government. and so it means striking the appropriate balance. >> mr. secretary, thank you so much. i think i'm going to see you roaming the halls of congress looking for some funding problem in the next couple of weeks. >> you certainly will. >> when they're working, at least. thank you so much. up next republican senator ted cruz on this homeland security fight, the war on isis and getting tough with vladimir putin. there comes a time in everyone's life when you want more. like a new meticulously engineered german sedan. finely crafted. exactingly precise. desire for such things often outpaces one's means. until now. hey matt, new jetta? yeah. introducing lots of new. the new volkswagen jetta. isn't it time for german engineering?

♪ (flute plays throughout) ♪ my new website on squarespace is designed to help you tuck yourself in at night. it features guided meditations soothing melodies, and stories to help you get cozy. i sincerely hope you dig it. whatever your idea is, build it beautiful

on squarespace. the world is filled with air. but for people with copd sometimes breathing air can be difficult. if you have copd, ask your doctor about once-daily anoro ellipta. it helps people with copd breathe better for a full 24hours. anoro ellipta is the first fda-approved product containing two long-acting bronchodilators in one inhaler. anoro is not for asthma. anoro contains a type of medicine that increases risk of death in people with asthma. it is not known if this risk is increased in copd. anoro won't replace rescue inhalers for sudden copd symptoms and should not be used more than once a day. tell your doctor if you have a heart condition, or high blood pressure. tell your doctor if you have glaucoma, prostate or bladder problems, or problems passing urine as anoro may make these problems worse. call your doctor right away if you have worsened breathing chest pain, swelling of your mouth or tongue,

problems urinating or eye problems including vision changes or eye pain while taking anoro. nothing can reverse copd. the world is filled with air and anoro is helping people with copd breath air better. get your first prescription free at anoro.com. at ally bank no branches equals great rates. it's a fact. kind of like shopping hungry equals overshopping.

top officials from the united states and europe are in germany this sunday for urgent discussions about security and the growing threat posed by vladimir putin's russia. vice president biden is there and he's sounding and talking tough, sort of like ronald reagan. >> given russia's recent history, we need to judge it by its deeds, not its words. don't tell us. show us president putin. . >> republican senator ted cruz member of the armed services chit is also at the conference. senator, thank you so much for joining us. let's start with the fight over what to do about the ukraine. the german chancellor, the french president has been trying to negotiate some kind of an

agreement and angela merkel of germany has specifically said she does not think it is time to arm the ukrainians yet. why do you think she's wrong? >> well, what she said at this conference is that she did not believe there was any prospect for ukraine to be successful in defending itself against russian aggression. i think that's mistaken, but at the same time i think chancellor merkel's position is not surprising given where president obama's position is. what we're doing with regard to ukraine and with regard to russia makes no sense and it isn't working. it is long past time for us to step forward and provide defensive weapons so that the men and women of ukraine can defend their nation. they are our allies in the budapest memorandum. we committed ourselves to standing with ukraine to defend them -- to defend their territorial integrity. >> you mentioned the fact that you think that the german chancellor is wrong. there seems to be a pretty

significant rift here within the western powers on how to deal with this. do you think that the u.s. should just arm the ukraine over the objections of the germans? >> well, look. there isn't a rift. i mean, what we're seeing is when america doesn't lead, europe can't be expected to step into the breach. what is missing from this is the president of the united states, and i've got to tell you, dana, i'm part of a large bipartisan congressional delegation here and it is striking that across bipartisan lines the delegation is united on the need for us to get serious and provide defensive arms to ukraine. >> the president wasn't there speaking out this weekend, but the vice president gave a very strong speech. he even got applause from some of your fellow republicans. the secretary of state as well with a pretty robust message towards the russians in defense of ukraine. isn't that leadership? >> look, the vice president i

thought gave an effective speech, but i've got to tell you, in the room what everyone kept saying is interesting speech. we have no confidence that president obama is listening to the vice president. listen, what we needed here and what we have needed for six years is strong american leadership. the obama/clinton/kerry foreign policy has been consistently wrong. it's been wrong on russia, it's been wrong on isis, it's been wrong on iran. what we needed today with regard to ukraine was presidential leadership that stood up and said we're going to honor our treaty. for the ukrainians to stand up to russian aggression, that's a message that would be heard by our allies, but it's also a message that would be heard by our enemies. nations like iran who are looking at the weakness of this administration and viewing it as an invitation for them to move even faster towards acquiring nuclear weapons. >> senator, you mentioned isis. let's turn to that. lindsey graham, your colleague who's there with you in munich

has called for 10,000 u.s. troops on the ground back in iraq to confront isis. is that a good idea? >> well, you know, we met today with the president of kurdistan and the kurds on the ground are outstanding fighters. the peshmerga had been our allies had been our friends. and they're actually fighting every day to stop isis. now, dana, what makes no sense whatsoever is the obama administration is refusing to directly arm the kurds. we need to arm the kurds now because they are our boots on the ground. i don't believe it is necessary to put american boots on the ground if we are arming the peshmerga, they're fighting there. just today they didn't ask us for boots on the ground but what they did say is they need the weaponry to stand up and destroy isis and the peshmerga on the ground combined with overwhelming american air power can take out isis but we're not

seeing leadership from the administration to get that done. instead, they continue to send weaponry to baghdad who doesn't pass it onto the peshmerga and it doesn't get put to use effectively. >> you're saying lindsey graham and even some in the pentagon who apparently are considering about 10,000 u.s. troops on the ground, that would be a bad move. >> in my view, american boots on the ground should always be the last step, and we need to exercise other steps before that. we have the availability of overwhelming air power and we have boots on the ground that are ready and eager to fight the peshmerga and they lack sufficient tools and equipment. >> senator, i want to turn to the plight of the u.s. aid worker, kayla mueller, who is allegedly, according to isis, they say that she died at the hands of a jordanian airstrike. we don't know her fate, but big picture. do you think it should be the

position of the united states to negotiate in order to get aid workers or americans who are hostages of groups like isis? because currently it is not. >> well, look, the reports coming from the ground are murky right now. we don't know her fate. certainly our prayers are with her and her family. we hope these early reports that she was killed are inaccurate. i don't think it is a wise policy to be negotiating with terrorists. the obama administration has gone down that road. for example, in the negotiations for sergeant bergdahl it released five senior taliban terrorists. there are now multiple reports that one or more of them have returned to actively fighting against americans trying to kill americans. it doesn't make sense to negotiate with terrorists. >> real quick when i said negotiate, what i meant is what they want is money, they want ransom. it is the united states' policy not to do that. families are very frustrated because they want to do whatever

they can to get their kid back. as a parent do you understand that? >> oh, look, of course we all understand the agony of the families, but giving money to terrorists that are using rape as a weapon of war, that are crucifying christians, that are crucifying and beheading children, giving money just buys additional arms to kidnap more americans and to murder more. that be doesn't make sense. the answer is to have serious leadership to defeat them. >> we're going to take a quick break. when we come back we are going to talk about politics back home. believe it or not, there is another potential shutdown of part of the government looming. senator cruz is part of this debate. we're going to talk about that after the break. i know... this third shift is rough... it's just a few more weeks max! what are you doing up? it's late.

i just wanted to have breakast wih you. meet the world's newest energy superpower. surprised? in fact, america is now the world's number one natural gas producer... and we could soon become number one in oil. because hydraulic fracturing technology is safely recovering lots more oil and natural gas. supporting millions of new jobs. billions in tax revenue... and a new century of american energy security. the new energy superpower? it's red, white and blue. log on to learn more. ♪♪ (playful growl) vo: because every moment matters, so does your network. verizon. this valentine's day get $100 off a swarovski crystal battery cover

or the samsung gear s. perfect with a new samsung galaxy note 4 for $0 down with edge. plus, get a $100 bill credit for each smartphone you switch. get our best deals (dog barks) for the ones you love (dog barks) this valentine's day. (dog barks) verizon. if you have moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis like me and you're talking to your rheumatologist about a biologic... this is humira. this is humira helping to relieve my pain and protect my joints from further damage. this is humira giving me new perspective. doctors have been prescribing humira for ten years. humira works for many adults. it targets and helps to block a specific source of inflammation that contributes to ra symptoms. humira can lower your ability to fight infections, including tuberculosis. serious, sometimes fatal infections and cancers including lymphoma have happened, as have blood, liver, and nervous system problems, serious allergic reactions, and new or worsening heart failure. before treatment get tested for tb. tell your doctor if you've been to areas where certain fungal infections are common, and if you've had tb hepatitis b, are prone to infections,

or have flu-like symptoms or sores. don't start humira if you have an infection. talk to your doctor and visit humira.com this is humira at work

and we are back with senator ted cruz of texas who is joining us from munich where there is an international security conference going on. senator, i want to bring it back home to the stalemate in congress over homeland security funding. the government again, that part of the government, runs out of

money in just a few weeks. republicans are looking at you and wondering what is your end game here because this is a strategy crafted by you, the idea of holding up funding for the department of homeland security in order to try to stop the president and his executive order on immigration. so what is your end game? >> well, dana, the premise of that question is not true, and it's frankly ridiculous. this is a strategy that came from republican leadership. this is the cromnibus strategy. if you'll recall i fought tooth and nail against this in december against this because i said in december this gives up our leverage and it puts us into effectively a boxed canyon. so i would say it's now up to leadership to lay out their strategy. i told them this was not a winning strategy and they went down this road anywhere fighting tooth and nail. but let me make a broader point. what we saw last week was

stunning irresponsibility with the senate democrats. the senate democrats three times phil filibustered funding for homeland security. we had funding for dhs. three times democrats stood together and filibustered and said we will not allow the senate to take up this bill, at a time of growing national security threats across the world. that's irresponsible. >> senator, with respect, it's not a ridiculous premise because what you wanted to do was hold up the entire government funding back in december and the cromnibus, we won't get too much in the weeds here, was a compromise to try to work around that. so that's i think the reality of what's going on here. on your point about the democrats, yes, they are holding up the bill. they're not allowing debate, but in the reality that if there were a debate, this bill still wouldn't pass and, again, when i say this bill, it's funding the department of homeland security but also stopping the president

from his executive action on immigration. the votes aren't there to pass that, right? >> well, dana, number one, we need to fund the department of homeland security. the democrats need to stop holding national security hostage for partisan political objectives. what they're doing is wrong and irresponsible. number two, when it comes to amnesty, amnesty, the president's executive amnesty is wrong, it's illegal and it's unconstitutional. you say it would necessarily get support in the senate. it's interesting. we don't know that. seven democrats had publicly criticized it on the campaign trail. they told their constituents they didn't support the president ignoring federal law, ignoring the constitution and unilaterally and illegally granting amnesty to 4 million to 5 million people here illegally. i think we need to tee it up and give them an opportunity to go on record to demonstrate whether they were telling the truth when they were talking to the voters back home or whether they'll just stand with president obama instead.

>> have you been working behind the scenes to try to get those senate democrats to buck their president, to vote with you all and pass a bill that stops his executive action? >> you know, unfortunately right now, dana, the democrats are working as a unit to filibuster funding for the department of homeland security, and it's one of the patterns we've seen the last six years that's really unusual, is that senate democrats have consistently been unwilling to take on the president. it's part of why harry reid and the democrats shut down the senate. i got to say, it's unprecedented. look, dana, if there's one thing you would acknowledge i've been willing to do is take on my own party when my own party is not standing for the principles we're supposed to stand for. it is time to see some senate democrats willing to take on their own president but right now they're putting partisan politics ahead of principle and that's why they're filibustering the funding for homeland

security. it is the wrong thing to be doing. >> you are dead right. you've had your differences, it's an understatement, with your party. there are some who we talk to say, here we go again, ted cruz taking us into a fight that we can't win again. what do you say to that? >> well, i think it's a good talking point for people who want to shift blame. let's be clear, the cromnibus was leadership's plan. i said at the time it is a bad plan and it is a plan that is designed to lose. >> i want to turn to 2016 politics before we go. the former governor of your state, rick perry, gave an interviews to "the texas tribune" and "washington post" was asked about having you as a competitor potentially. "it's one of the selling points if you will to the american people is they decide who's going to follow barack obama. i think they're going to make a radical shift away from a young untested united states senator whose policies have really failed." ouch. he's calling you the republican barack obama.

>> listen, i like rick perry. he was a good governor in the state of texas. he's a friend of mine. people occasionally throw rocks in politics. that's his choice. i'm going say i think he did a good and effective job as governor of our state. >> okay. taking the high road there. are you going to run for president, senator cruz? >> dana, i'm looking at it very, very seriously. i think we're facing enormous challenges in the country. the obama economy has led to the lowest labor participation force since 1978. 92 million americans aren't working. obamacare is a train wreck. we're seeing our constitutional rights under assault and abroad the obama/clinton/kerry foreign policy is an unmitigated disaster. leading from behind doesn't work. i think this next election in 2016 is going to be a fundamental fork in the road and i believe the american people are looking for a new path. they want to get back to the free market principles and constitutional liberties that were part of the foundation of

this country. so it's something i'm looking at very seriously. i'll tell you, the support that we're seeing both on the grassroots level and also among the donors has been extraordinary. it really has been encouraging. >> wow, that certainly sounded like you've been practicing your stump speech in the mirror. thank you so much, senator cruz. appreciate your time. >> thank you, dana. up next, democratic senator tim cain joins me for a very different perspective on what's needed to win the war on isis.

in the nation, we know how it feels when you aren't treated like a priority. we do things differently. we'll take care of it. we put members first. join the nation. thank you. ♪ nationwide is on your side ♪

now that senator ted cruz now that senator ted cruz has given us his take on homeland security and isis, let's get a perspective from senator tim cain. he's a member of the senate armed services committee. i want to start with what appears to be the question of the day, ground troops. do you believe that there should be ground troops in iraq to go

after isis, as many as 10,000 as some are calling for? >> dana, i actually believe there should be ground troops but they should be ground troops from the region and not u.s. ground troops. i heard the interview with senator cruz, the peshmerga, that is the fighting wing of the kurds, the iraqi security forces, other regional actors. i think we've just got to be candid. we cannot police a region that won't police itself and so the ground troops need to be from the region but the united states's strong support via the air campaign, via training and equipping, via helping guide the air campaign to make that effective, that's we should do. that's what we are doing and we can do more of it. >> wow, first let's say that you just agreed with senator cruz. i'm not sure that you expected to do that on many issues. >> no, on this one -- on this one we're in the same place because, again, we can't police a region that won't police itself. i was with king abdullah earlier this week.

very emotional after the death of this jordanian pilot in a horrible way. even he said this fight against isil, it is our fight. it is the region's fight. the u.s. can help us but you can't do it for us. we've got to speak out against the regional terrorism and it's up to us to do it. >> do you agree that the u.s. is not doing enough to fund and train the peshmerga to go ahead and help those in the region who do have the capability but need more? >> well, first, dana, i'll say we're doing a lot. today is the six month anniversary of the president starting the war against isis with this significant american air campaign. i visited the air force base in qatar where we're directing the campaign and we've provided significant assistance to the kurds and others. but i do think that we can do more. in terms of providing more arms and assistance to the kurds, that's something that we should do. we should be building up the capacity, especially of the kurds and the iraqi security force, and also sunni tribal leaders in iraq because we've been able to kind of slow the advances of isil in iraq but we have to push back and move onto

the tougher aspect of how to take the fight to isil and syria. >> senator, you mentioned it's been six months, which is kind of hard to believe, since the airstrikes have started. it's been happening without a new authorization from congress, which you have been calling for since day one. we now think that it's actually going to at least -- the wheels are going to start moving this coming week. >> yes. >> what took so long? >> well, dana, it is not a pretty sight and i'm really sort of very discouraged, frankly both by the administration and by congress. when the president started this war on the eighth of august i indicated right from the start that there were not existing legal authorities from 2001 and 2002 that would justify this action and as soon as we decided to engage in a war on isil, and that's what the administration has called it. congress needed to weigh in. >> what is the administration saying to you, a fellow democrat who's been very outspoken about why they dragged their feet so long?

>> well, partly because the congressional leadership went to the administration in july. both houses in both parties and i'm sad to say this, dana. the white house went to the leadership and said, do what you need to do. we would rather not take this up before a mid-term election. i introduced a resolution in september authorizing limited military action against isil but congress wouldn't vote on it before the mid-term. then i purnd itshed it after november and i was able to get a vote in the senate foreign relations committee to finding a mission in a limited way. we voted out a bill in the senate foreign relations committee in december. the house hasn't been willing to talk about this in a committee. i'll tell you what offends me about this. we've already lost american service members' lives in this operation and we've done it without congress being willing to do the job of having a vote. if we're going to ask people to risk their lives, then congress ought to do our job and put our thumbprint on this mission and say it is in the national interest. i think the white house will send an authorization up. there's going to be some hard questions about it, but i think

the president will find strong support in both houses for taking appropriate military action. >> senator, let's quickly drill down on the content of this resolution. there are differences over how specific congress should be about the question of boots on the ground because -- >> absolutely. >> -- there's a lot of gray area there of what that actually means. i know that you support only having boots on the ground in limited circumstances. >> yes. >> do you think that is going to fly? >> well, i think that congress in both parties would significantly support it. you heard senator cruz. he's not the only republican who has said to me that american boots on the ground is sort of a last resort so the resolution that i introduced that was passed, a version of it in foreign relations said, no combat troops except in following instances -- the rescue of hostages or any americans that are captured. some directing of the airstrike campaigns to be more effective. so i think the right answer -- and there is a difference of opinion about this, but the

right answer is only combat troops in limited circumstances, and then there's some other differences of opinion, too, that we're going to have to work through in hearings in the foreign relations committees. >> okay. well, people are looking for bipartisanship on capitol hill. we saw some here just this morning. unlikely bipartisanship in opposition to ground troops but we heard it nonetheless. senator, thank you so much for your time. appreciate it. >> absolutely, dana. up next, the ever present backdrop of washington's politics. when homeland security becomes a political football, does everybody lose? a current member of congress and a former member of the intelligence committee joins us next. the exhilaration of a new engine. painstakingly engineered without compromise. to be more powerful... and, miraculously, unleash 46 mpg highway. an extravagance reserved for the privileged few. until now. hey josh! new jetta? yeah. introducing lots of new.

the new volkswagen jetta tdi clean diesel. isn't it time for german engineering? flo: hey, big guy. i heard you lost a close one today. look, jamie, maybe we weren't the lowest rate this time. but when you show people their progressive direct rate and our competitors' rates you can't win them all. the important part is, you helped them save. thanks, flo. okay, let's go get you an ice cream cone, champ. with sprinkles? sprinkles are for winners. i understand. eh, you don't want that one. yea, actually i do. it's mucinex fast-max night time and it's got a nasal decongestant. is that really a thing? it sounds made up. i can't sleep when i'm all stuffy. i take offense to that. i'm not going to argue with a talking ball of mucus. i think you're being a little hasty... he's not with me. mucinex fast max night time.

multi-symptom relief plus nasal decongestant. breathe easy. sleep easy. start the relief. ditch the misery. let's end this. many people clean their dentures with toothpaste or plain water. and even though their dentures look clean, in reality they're not. if a denture were to be put under a microscope we can see all the bacteria that still exists on the denture and that bacteria multiplies very rapidly. that's why dentists recommend cleaning with polident everyday. polident's unique micro clean formula works in just 3 minutes, killing 99.99% of odor causing bacteria.

for a cleaner, fresher brighter denture everyday. ommmmmmm my new website on squarespace is designed to help you tuck yourself in at night. it features guided meditations soothing melodies, and stories to help you get cozy. ommmmmmm i sincerely hope you dig it. whatever your idea is, build it beautiful on squarespace.

in war and in peace, the one constant here in washington is politics. joining me now congresswoman tulcy gabbard, a combat veteran

from hawaii on both armed services and foreign affairs committee. and mike rogers, cnn national security commentator and former chair of the house intelligence committee. thanks to you both. i actually want to start with kayla mueller, the u.s. aid worker whose fate is unknown, and diane foley, the mother of one of the men beheaded. said this, kayla, along with our son and others were held for nearly two years and there were several opportunities when captors reached out, returning hostages brought sensitive information and yet nothing was done to save our young americans. knowing what you know, i'll start with you, congresswoman, do you think that's true? or is this the understandably distraught feeling of a mother who lost her son. first of all, it's unimaginable to try to put ourselves in her position or the position of the parents of each of these people who have either been beheaded or slaughtered by these radical

islamic extremist terrorists. i think it's important for us as a country, as leaders of this nation, to not allow ourselves to be terrorized by these radical extremists, not allow ourselves to fall into the trap they are trying to set up. and understand when these very difficult things happen, just as we've seen most recently in jordan, that we must strengthen our resolve, strengthen our focus and commitment understanding exactly who our enemy is, why they are perpetrating these horrific acts and then come up with an effective strategy to defeat them. >> you were in congress, chair on the intelligence committee, when a lot of these issues were coming up. is the u.s. doing enough? >> it's a very difficult circumstance, obviously for the mother. i think she is distraught, trying to find rational thought in something completely irrational, the beheading of her son. that's set aside. the united states took a pretty significant risk in sending a pretty daring rescue mission. now, the intelligence proved to be a little old. they were a little slow in

implementing. but the fact they would risk these soldiers and special forces community's personnel's lives in rescue attempts shows there were good faith efforts. remember, in the foley case, the amount of money was like $132 million, if my memory serves me correctly. that is not a realistic number for negotiation. they really never intended to turn foley over. they were using all of this for propaganda and that adds also to the difficulty. >> that's an interesting point, because some of these parents, family members, are saying it's u.s. policy law to prevent us from giving money, paying ransom to get our family members back. i'm assuming you think that is a good policy to stick with, particularly since you think it's just a ruse, propaganda. >> i even think smaller amounts cause trouble. remember, this is those hard decisions.

is that one person at risk -- if you do this, how many other people do you put at risk? how many other americans do you make targets on their head who are operating in that region. that's the problem. it is horrific because you get to know this person. but think of the people who are exposed if you make those ransom payments. >> congresswoman, i want to ask you what to do now with regard to isis. you are actually somebody who has been there. you were in combat in iraq. do you think it is the right thing to be sending in as many as 10,000 ground troops that some are calling for in order to just try to completely annihilate isis once and for all? >> first of all, ground troops i agree with the two people, senator cain as well as senator cruz, yes, there do need to be troops on the ground to work in conjunction with airstrikes that we and jordan and other coalition forces are conducting in order to be effective. but i think we need to take one step previously.

we need to start with the basics, which is, first of all, identifying who our enemy is. understanding this war cannot be won, this enemy and threat cannot be defeated unless we understand what's driving them, what is their ideology. the fact is when you look at what is happening today, we have over 40 different islamic extremist terrorist groups going by different names. look at the vast majority of terrorist attacks committed around the world, there's one common element here and it is this radical islamic ideology. in order to defeat it, we have to do so militarily and simultaneously, it has to be an ideological defeat as well as a political solution that's offered. >> on that note, you've been hearing so much talk over the past couple of years about the fact that you've got to have a strong leader in the region to do the things that you just talked about. now, unfortunately because of what happened to the jordanian pilot, you have the king of jordan now being able to rally his people. is he the leader that the united

states and western world has been looking for in order to combat islamic extremists? >> the king who spent a lot of time in washington, d.c. over the last few years really talking about this growing extremist problem for the region in eastern syria. so he's been laying out plans literally for three years on how he thought the united states should help the region. this could act as the catalyst for discussions that have already happened. i think the king believed he couldn't wait any longer. this was, in an odd way, his permission to engage in the very plans he's been laying out. he understood probably more than any other leader in that region the danger of this extremist group and what it meant to all of the leadership. >> having been on the ground there, do you think this was an unfortunate but maybe -- >> galvanizing. >> -- turning point? >> not only for the leadership

of these moderate and muslim and arab countries, but also for the people there to be able to support those actions. 7 i think, again, going back to my last point, the king of jordan when he was here just a few days ago, he made that point that this is about having a decisive military strategy coinciding with war. this has been going on for 1400 years. it's time for leaders to step up and take action. >> congresswoman, thank you so much. former congressman, thank you so much. we will continue this discussion for sure. we'll be right back. when it comes to good nutrition...i'm no expert. that would be my daughter -- hi dad. she's a dietitian. and back when i wasn't eating right, she got me drinking boost. it's got a great taste and it helps give me the nutrition i was missing. helping me stay more like me. [ female announcer ] boost complete nutritional drink has 26 essential vitamins and minerals, including calcium and vitamin d to support strong bones and 10 grams of protein to help maintain muscle. all with a delicious taste. grandpa! [ female announcer ] stay strong,

stay active with boost. at ally bank no branches equals great rates. it's a fact. kind of like mute buttons equal danger. ...that sound good? not being on this phone call sounds good. it's not muted. was that you jason? it was geoffrey! it was jason. it could've been brenda. i know... this third shift is rough... it's just a few more weeks max! what are you doing up? it's late. i just wanted to have breakast wih you. ♪♪ (playful growl) vo: because every moment matters, so does your network. verizon. this valentine's day get $100 off

a swarovski crystal battery cover or the samsung gear s. perfect with a new samsung galaxy note 4 for $0 down with edge. plus, get a $100 bill credit for each smartphone you switch. get our best deals (dog barks) for the ones you love (dog barks) this valentine's day. (dog barks) verizon. you only know in a fire to get out, to escape and now ok you are outside and you are safe but what do you do now and that's where the red cross came in... . we ran out of the house just wearing our pajamas. at that point just to even have a toothbrush that i could call my own was so important... . ...you know it just makes you feel like a person again. every 8 minutes the american red cross responds to a home fire or other emergency. you can help. please donate now.

>> thank you so much for watching state of the union. i'm dana bash in washington. "fareed zakaria gps" starts now. \s >> this is "gps," the global public square. welcome to you in the united states and around the world. i'm fareed zakaria. today on the show, the two major threats that flared up this week. first isis. president obama called it a