iowa caucuses. >> bye! go get something to eat, guys. >> thanks for spending your sunday with us. "fareed zakaria gps" starts right now. this is "gps," the global public square. welcome to all of you in the united states and around the world. i'm fareed zakaria. today we will tackle the united states' four big foreign policy challenges. iran, iraq. china and russia. we'll start the show this week with iran. last week you heard president obama make his case for the deal. >> that's not just good for the united states. that is very good for israel. >> today israel's ambassador to the united states makes the case

against. >> we believe that this deal threatens the survival of israel. ♪ ♪ china's currency is falling and world markets are trembling. why? i'll talk about former u.s. ambassador to china and former presidential candidate jon huntsman. then, why in the world is raucha destr russia destroying hundreds of tons of food when its own people are struggling to get by. a harvard law professor is running for president. not elizabeth warren. lawrence lessig. really. he will explain why. but first here is my take. today it's in the form of a letter. dear senator schumer. when you announced your decision to vote against the nuclear

agreement with iran, you explained your reasons in a nearly 1,700 word statement that is thoughtful in substance and civil in tone. and yet, in the end, i found it unpersuasive. i believe that the agreement is flawed, but it is the most intrusive, demanding and comprehensive set of inspections, verification protocols and snap-back measures ever negotiated. you failed to take note of what must happen at the outset before iran gets any widespread sergeants relief. iran must destroy 98% of its enriched uranium. 5 to 20%, remore and restore two-thirds of the centrifuges, terminate all enrichment at the fordo nuclear facility and render inoperable the key components of its iraq plutonium

reactor. all the steps must be completed to the satisfaction of the international atomic energy agency. it's difficult to imagine that a serious military campaign against iran would set back its nuclear program as much as this deal does at its outset. your first objections are about the inspections and sanctions. you argue that the inspections are not anytime, anywhere and have a 24-day delay that is troubling. but all of iran's known nuclear facilities would be subject to anytime, anywhere monitoring. as for new suspicious sites, what opponents of the deal have done is add up all the time limits and claim that the inspections will occur only after a 24-day pause. this is simply not true. should the u.s. intelligence community catch the iranians red-handed it might be that the iranians would drag things out as long as possible, but in such a case the game would be over.

in that scenario, senator schumer, you argue that the sanctions' snap-back provisions are cumbersome. the domestic i t they can be triggered unilaterally by washington. you argue that the united states priet prefer to restore sanctions in part and that other countries may not go along with this, but the fact that washington could unilaterally snap back all sanctions is surely extraordinary leverage that it could use to get other countries to agree to a partial reimposition of multi-lateral sanctions. your second objection is that, after 15 years of relief from sanctions, iran would be stronger financially and better able to advance a robust nuclear program. let's be clear. iran is going to get sanctions relief no matter what. the international sanctions

against iran were put in place by other countries solely to get a nuclear deal. none would go along with extending the sanctions given that iran has produced what they all regard as an acceptable agreement. they've said as much. your final objection is that iran would use some of the newly freed-up resources to redouble its efforts to create even more trouble in the middle east. that might be true, but the deal does not stop the united states and its allies from countering these activities as they do today. your basic conclusion is that, if one thinks iran will moderate, one should approve the agreement. but if one feels that iranian leaders will not moderate then one should conclude that it would be better not to approve this agreement. this is the most puzzling and frankly illogical part of your case. if iran remains a rogue state, all the more reason to put its nuclear program on a leash. rejecting this deal would result in an iran that ramps up its

nuclear program without inspections or constraints, with sanctions unraveling, and an america that is humiliated and isolated in the world. and so i respectfully urge you to reconsider your position. for more, go to cnn.com/fareed and read my "washington post" column this week. let's get started. ♪ ♪ you've just heard my take on the merits of the iran deal, but i always want you to hear all sides, so let us now hear from one of the deal's chief opponents. ron dermer is israel's ambassador to the united states, prior to being named to that post he was a senior advisor, some would say the senior advisor to israeli prime minister benjamin netanyahu. welcome. >> good to be with you. >> what the iranians say is that, if the deal falls through,

they will resume their nuclear program. what the europeans say now publicly, the british ambassador says if the deal is rejected the sanctions will unravel. why is that a good scenario for israel security? >> i just don't think it's true. one of the two things cannot happen. if iran goes ahead with its nuclear program, which it was doing in october 2013, before the interim agreement was signed, then it will not come into compliance with this agreement. there will be no implementation date. >> nobody has signed this agreement. so how -- why would they need to be in compliance. >> i'm saying they weren't. in the real world, if iran goes ahead with its nuclear program, there will be no implementation day which means the u.n. sanctions are stay and all the u.s. sanctions will stay. it's hard to see companies that will do business with iran after this is voted down by congress and turn themselves away from a

$17 trillion u.s. economy. it might be that iran will continue its program. we don't believe they'll break out. they'll go underneath the red line that they perceive that the international community will act against them, but you will not have a situation where iran does not comply with its agreement and the sanctions regime unravels. that just can't happen. there is no logic to that approach. >> that is what the europeans and russians are trying to sell them. >> how does that happen in the real world? i don't get it. if the u.n. security council sanctions stay, u.s. sanctions stay. >> companies don't always abide by them de facto. let me ask you about these time lines. for 20 years prime minister netanyahu said that iran is two to three years away from a bomb. nobody i know in mossad or the u.s. intelligence believes that counter intelligence efforts have done more than delay iran by a year or two. so why has he been wrong for 20 years about iran? is it that your -- is it

possible that you have not -- you don't completely understand iran? >> look, i think that the prime minister of israel understands iran better than almost any leader in the world because he has been focusing on this issue for 20 years. >> saying -- >> get the facts. look at what he said. >> i've been with the prime minister for 15 years. i know exactly what he said over those 15 years. i can't account for the five years before. the prime minister has said there was a certain period, could be two or four years away from getting a bomb. i guarantee you, had the united states and israel done nothing over the last 15 years they might have had a bomb ten years ago. united states and israel have worked together from preventing iran from becoming a nuclear power. we should continue to work together to prevent iran from having a nuclear capability. this closes the file by ceding a nuclear weapons capability and an arsenal.

>> the leader of the opposition in israel says the biggest problem with the strategy you're pursuing is is that you're alienating the obama administration and washington. isn't it true that no matter what happens, for israel's security a close relationship with washington is essential? you're taking a position that's at odds with the obama administration, at odds with hilary clinton. do you worry about that? >> as to your question about the u.s.-israel relation ship, no question this is the most important relationship in the world. we are not eager to have to be at odds on the most important foreign policy for the president of the united states. that's a big deal. the survival of the state of israel is also a big deal, and we believe this deal threatens the survival of israel. even with our best of friends we've made our case to president obama. we are making it to the senators and congressman who will decide

the fate of this deal in congress. we're telling them that this is a bad deal that endangers israel's security. when the president of the united states and secretary of state john kerry say they believe this deal is better for america and better for israel, i have no doubt that they're being sincere. we just disagree with their judgment. we think this deal will endanger israel security. in israel this view is shared by the prime minister, by the head of the opposition, by 30 out of 33 members of our foreign affairs defense committee. moses didn't have those kind of numbers. >> the former head of mossad, for example, disagrees. >> we're a jewish state. there are a lot of opinions. we're a democracy. we are not unanimous on anything. the overwhelming majority of the israeli people, all the security establishment actually responsible for the security of the country and the political leadership of the country, both coalition opposition believe this is a bad deal. you know this to be true. our concerns are shared by our arab neighbors. they may express is publicly in

a different way but they see the deal in the same way we do. >> let me ask you about american jews. 29 former generals and admirals signed a letter supporting the deal. the retired admiral harold robinson, a rabbii said as a life-long zionist devoted to israel, he spores thupports thi. is it possible to be pro israel and in favor of this deal? >> yes. it's possible to be deeply pro-american and be very opposed to this deal. it's important, just as i say not to question the sincerity of motives of people who support the deal to not question the sincerity of motives of the people who oppose it. two of three americans oppose this deal because they know iran has been at war with america for 36 years. they've held americans hostage. blown up marines and barracks in

b beir beirut. they're responsible for the murder and maiming of thousands of american soldiers in iraq and afghanistan. there is good reason why most americans are opposed to this deal. >> pleasure to have you on. that was ron dermer, israel's ambassador to the united states. i'll talk to a former ambassador of the united states to china, jon huntsman. he is a former presidential candidate. i'll ask him about china's manipulation of currency and about the doned. donald. but it is not the device that is mobile, it is you. real madrid have about 450 million fans. we're trying to give them all the feeling of being at the stadium. the microsoft cloud gives us the scalability to communicate exactly the content that people want to see.

it will help people connect to their passion of living real madrid. food should be good. strawberries should sing. lettuce should be dirty. dressing, clean. debates should be healthy. hatchets buried. tables should be full. and good food should be good for you. we're not saying these are the rules we should all live by. but it's a good place to start. panera. food as it should be. just about anywhere you can use splenda®... ...no calorie sweetener. splenda® lets you experience... ...the joy of sugar... ...without all the calories. think sugar, say splenda® it's got the spring and bounce of a traditional mattress. you sink into it, but you can still move around.

now that i have a tempur-flex, i can finally get a good night's sleep. (vo) change your sleep. change your life. change to tempur-pedic. the uncertainties i don't wantof hep c.with or wonder... ...whether i should seek treatment. i am ready. because today there's harvoni. a revolutionary treatment for the most common type of chronic hepatitis c. harvoni is proven to cure up to 99% of patients... ...who've had no prior treatment. it's the one and only cure that's...

...one pill, once a day for 12 weeks. certain patients... ...can be cured with just 8 weeks of harvoni. with harvoni, there's no interferon and there are no complex regimens. tell your doctor if you have other liver or kidney problems, or other medical conditions. and about all the medicines you take including herbal supplements. harvoni should not be taken with any medicines containing amiodarone, rifampin, or st. john's wort. it also should not be taken with any other medicine that contains sovaldi. side effects may include tiredness and headache. i am ready to put hep c behind me. i am ready to be cured. are you ready? ask your hep c specialist if harvoni is right for you.

on tuesday, china announced that it had devalued its currency by 2%. immediately and quite violently, markets around the world reacted. they weren't pleased. why? well, let me try to explain. business just got easier for chinese companies because their products were suddenly 2% cheaper overseas and cheaper still later in the week. and business just got a lot harder for big western companies. an apple iphone just got 2% pricier for a chinese consumer. and pricier still by friday. donald trump, for one, is furious. >> china devaluing their currency. so they did it again to us today, folks. >> but many reasonable people

are worried as well. the devaluation stokes fears about the state of the world's second largest economy and the government's ability to manage it. to understand it all, let me bring in the former u.s. ambassador to china jon huntsman. he of course also ran for the republican nomination for president in 2012. welcome, jon. >> thank you, fareed. it's a pleasure to be with you. >> jon, tell me first, why do you think markets around the world reacted as strongly as they did to this devaluation? >> well, china is no longer an average player in the global economy. they're the second largest economy in the world. and when you have the deevaluation of 2% off the bat, automatically as you mentioned you're going to have a higher cost burden on the exports from the united states to asia. and to one of our largest export markets. to say nothing of the impact it will have on the region. so when you look at the immediate impact that it had on currencies, for example, in

malaysia, indonesia and vietnam, it's creating a fire storm within the region. you get a sense as to why people are very, very frustrated. >> net-net economically, jon, this is bad, right? it means the chinese economy is slowing. china has been one of the motors of the global economy. it means that china is moving away from some of the reform models it has had and is moving more towards state control and mercantili mercantilism. will this have an impact, you think, on global growth, on, for example -- you already see prices of commodities and oil have gone down, presumably or partly because china's demand has slowed down. >> well, they're hit by very low commodity prices right now, but exceedingly high inventories. by a population of 1.4 billion people who need to begin investing more into their

economy and spending more and consuming more. and it's very difficult to get your population to invest more in your future when you've just lost 25% of the value of the stock exchanges. people who have, moreover, very little belief in the long-term strength and well-being of your economy. so the challenge for them is how do you navigate this basket of reforms which you know long term are probably necessary for the country but short term you have a messaging problem. that is, how do you convince the consumer class in china, which soon will be the largest consumer class the world has ever known, that they need to spend more and invest more in the future of the country at a time when all the indicators suggest that's not a good thing to do right now. you must be watching the republican primary are interest and amusement. you've been through this before. what was your reaction to the

debate? who did you think did well? >> well, amusement to be sure, fareed. there is a bit of entertainment value here. i have to say that, for all of the negative commentary that the republican bench is deep, it's well-populated. i think some of the candidates actually believe in big, bold ideas, actually believe in reform. and i think that kind of conversation is desperately needed in this country, and that's what's going to create the race to the top that the american people are waiting for. >> jon, what do you make of the phenomenon of donald trump? >> well, this is where we are. i have to tell you that, having been involved in the last election cycle, i mean, per -- personally invested in it as a candidate, people are angry. they're very angry at the political class. they've been angry for two or three election cycles. and i think what trump represents is the ultimate loud, brash, big protest vote. it doesn't matter that he

doesn't have specific policy proposals. it doesn't matter that he's not as glib and presentable maybe as some of the professional politicians. people want a big, loud, brash protest vote right now. that's a good chunk of the republican party. and he is that person. and he embodies exactly the anger and the disgust that so many have about politics. he'll either take that to the early primaries and perform well or he'll crash and burn. and with it you'll see some implications in terms of how the republican party therefore is able to hold together as a single party without fracturing over time, which i think could be a result of all of this depending upon how things go. >> sobering words, intelligent and reasoned as always. jon huntsman. thank you. >> thank you, fareed. when we come back, the soviets used to talk of destroying america and the west, now their russian successes have

to make do by destroying food from the united states and the west. i'll explain this odd and tragic turn of events when we come back.

my name is mark amann. i'm a gas service rep for pg&e in san jose. as a gas service rep we are basically the ambassador of the company. we make the most contact with the customers on a daily basis.

i work hand-in-hand with crews to make sure our gas pipes are safe. my wife and i are both from san jose. my kids and their friends live in this community. every time i go to a customer's house, their children could be friends with my children so it's important to me. one of the most rewarding parts of this job is after you help a customer, seeing a smile on their face. together, we're building a better california.

now for our what in the world segment. russian president vladimir putin has declared a war on cheese. after he issued a presidential decree, a mound of it was destroyed by a bulldozer. authorities also incinerated loads of bacon and destroyed peaches and tomatoes. in all, hundreds of tons of food have been eliminated recently in russia. what in the world is going on? well, russia had banned most foods from the european union, the united states and others retaliating against the sanctions those nations imposed after russia's bad behavior in ukraine. but some of those contraband goods were still getting into the country so putin declared a crack-down, ordering the destruction of such food to be filmed and photographed to make his point. all of this has made for some entertaining political theater

and putin probably thinks it makes him look powerful. but in reality, russia and putin have some very serious problems. as nick butler pointed out recently in an excellent financial "times" piece, russia's economy is in big trouble because of its dependence on selling oil to survive. according to trading economics, between a fifth and a quarter of russia's gdp comes from the energy sector. and it accounts for 65% of its total exports. in other words, it's the major mover in the russian economy. meanwhile, oil prices have plummeted over 50% in little more than a year. russia's economy is forecast to drop 3.5% this year because of the freefall butler points out. the global supply of oil is still growing at a breakneck pace according to the international energy agency. so russia's oil-dependant

economy will not get a break anytime soon. besides his power grabs in ukraine, this period in russia's history might be one of its low points. butler's article points to a fascinating book called russia empire. today russia is weaker than it has been at almost anytime in the last 300 years, the book observes. to add insult to injury, russia is also one of the least popular nations in the world these days. in a recent survey by pugh, a median of just 30% of non-russians viewed russia favorably. a median of just 24% had confidence that president putin would do the right thing in world affairs. while putin remains popular at home, many of his countrymen are outraged by his war on western food given that there are plenty of people who need food in russia.

food prices have spiked by 20% in the last year and russia's poverty rate claimed by 5% in one year. an online petition urging the government to end the campaign has over 350,000 signatures. mr. putin would be wise to listen. he should channel his frustration into fixing russia's fundamentally flawed economy rather than taking it out on pieces of fruit. next on "gps." my next guest, lawrence lessig wants to take the money out of politics. what will he do it? run for president. hear from the potential president candidate when we come back.

listerine® total care strengthens teeth, after brushing, helps prevent cavities and restores tooth enamel. it's an easy way to give listerine® total care to the total family. listerine® total care. one bottle, six benefits. power to your mouth™. so you're a small business expert from at&t? yeah, give me a problem and i've got the solution. well, we have 30 years of customer records. our cloud can keep them safe and accessible anywhere. my drivers don't have time to fill out forms. tablets. keep it all digital. we're looking to double our deliveries. our fleet apps will find the fastest route. oh, and your boysenberry apple scones smell about done. ahh, you're good. i like to bake. add new business services with at&t and get up to $500 in total savings. it's how you stay connected. with centurylink as your trusted technology partner,

you get an industry leading broadband network and cloud and hosting services. centurylink. your link to what's next.

medical supplies i'm kind of happy with my guys. i think you'll love our newest line the stuff my vendor sells works fine. and my budget's small, just so you know. ♪ should i stay or should i go when you choose to go for business, go to the new choicehotels.com it makes finding the right room faster and easier than ever. book now at choicehotels.com

my next guest is mad and he's not going to take it anymore. lawrence lessig is angry about the current state of american elections, especially american presidential elections and how they're funded. he says our representative democracy is decidedly unrepresented.

the whole system is rigged and until we unrig it, no reform is possible. so what is he going to do about it? he is going to run for president, maybe. depending on how much money he can crowd source. i will let him explain. lawrence lessig is a professor of law and leadership at the harvard law school and a very popular ted talker, totaling more than four million views and counting. larry, let me first ask you, what do you think of the current presidential campaign you've been watching? >> well, sometimes when i let myself engage in a state of disbelief i am incredibly excited because the bold ideas that are being spoken of in my party about how we address some of the most important problems are exactly the kinds of solutions we need. but then i'm woken up into the reality that these ideas that they're talking about cannot happen until we address the rigged system first. so climate change legislation will not be passed in the united states until we address this

corrupt system for funding campaigns first. >> why? explain why. >> well, because we have set up the most unequal, corrupt system for funding anywhere in the world, i think, in a democracy like ours and equivalent to what we had basically a hundred years ago. basically right now members of congress and candidates for the congress and president are spending all of their time raising money from a tiny, tiny fraction of us. "new york times" had an article last week finding 400 families have contributed half of the money that has gone into the presidential election cycle so far. in the south they used to run the white primary where only whites were allowed to vote. we have now created the green primary where only the funders get to vote and they vote on who will have the money necessary to run their campaigns. the public ser exception is with you. nbc "wall street journal" poll asked what is the leading issue concerning voters in the upcoming election.

and what was it? >> it was this issue precisely, the influence of big money in the elections. same thing new york times ran a poll and found 84% of americans thought this issue, the min in elections, was an important problem that had to be addressed. the problem is people are so cynical and skeptical that anything can be done about it. >> so you're going to run for president, and you -- on a platform that will fix this? >> that's right. my claim is, we've got to find a way to fix the rigged system first. and that means a plan that would have a mandate powerful enough to actually stand up to congress and fight for this idea against the most powerful interest that we have in our democracy. if elected i will stay as president only as long as it takes to get the fundamental reform passed. once it's passed i would step aside and the elected vice president would come in and fill out the term and could run for re-election to thso that the ma

that i would have would be as strong as any could possibly be. it's not one of eight different issues. it's the only issue. >> what is the reform? what would you do? >> so the essence of the refarm is to de-corrupt the system. make it so we're equal citizens again. the one i care the most about is to change the way we fund elections. no longer is it the tiny few at the front of the line, the rich millionaires and billionaires who get to represent our government but all the citizens. that's not the only inequality. political jerry mandiring. minority parties in a safe majority seat. that should be addressed as well. number three, these schemes for making it difficult for people to vote by, you know, putting burdens like i.d. requirements are completely unjustified in a system that is supposed to

create equality of citizens. so these three together force us to recognize that we have lost the fundamental commitment of a representative democracy, and the consequence is a government that can't do anything. you know, this is not a philosophical or theoretical problem. this is practical as mud. the problem is, our government can't govern. and until we confront that reality and just accept the fact that we have to find a way to fix it and then talk about what we're going to do to fix it rather than playing this fantasy politics game every four years, we're not going to have the ability to govern. >> the reason nothing can get done you say is you can talk a good game but once you get in congress is so beholden to a small group of special interests that will veto all these things. >> obviously. i am from the left and i care about climate change legislation or taking on wall street. you listen to the candidates talk about taking on wall street and you say, look, this is the largest contributor to

congressional campaigns. you can't take them on until you change the way elections are funded. >> if your plan goes as you hope and you do end up president and preside over these reforms and then leave, it sounds like the very consequential choice you're going to make is who will be your vice president because he or she will serve out your term. >> that's right. so this is kind of two for the price of one. but the judgment has got to be who can make it possible for this ticket of this very unique referendum president and a vice president to win the votes necessary to prevail in the general election. >> and describe the crowd-sourcing. how likely is it that you will hit your target, and how does it work? >> so what we've set is a million dollar goal by labor day. that was about 27 days. in the first day we raised $150,000. $125,000, which means we are about one-eighth of the way in the first day. so we're pretty optimistic we'll

be able to hit the goal. >> larry lessig. best of luck. >> thank you, fareed. next up on "gps," you can't destroy isis without first fixing iraq. and is iraq actually working on solving some of its problems? that's the big news this week. we will dig in when we come back. [ female announcer ] take skincare to the next level with roc® multi correxion® 5 in 1. proven to hydrate dryness, illuminate dullness, lift sagging, diminish the look of dark spots, and smooth the appearance of wrinkles. high performance skincare™ only from roc®.

it's got the spring and bounce of a traditional mattress. and smooth the appearance of wrinkles. you sink into it, but you can still move around. now that i have a tempur-flex, i can finally get a good night's sleep. (vo) change your sleep. change your life. change to tempur-pedic.

the goodness that goes into making a power kale chicken caesar salad is rivaled only, by the goodness felt while eating one. panera. food as it should be. look more like a tissue box... you may be muddling through allergies. try zyrtec® for powerful allergy relief. and zyrtec® is different than claritin®. because it starts working faster on the first day you take it. zyrtec®. muddle no more™ .

♪ whoa what are you doing? putting on a movie. i'm trying to watch the game here. look i need this right now ok? come on i don't want to watch that. too bad this is happening. fine, what if i just put up the x1 sports app right here.

ah jeez it's so close. he just loves her so much. do it. come on. do it. come on! yes! awww, yes! that is what i'm talking about. baby. call and upgrade to get x1 today. ♪ defeating isis is a priority for the united states and the world. but how to do so? after all, isis currently controls large swaths of two countries, both of which are frankly disasters. syria is in the midst of an actual civil war and iraq has been in a low-grade i for the better portion of the last 12 years. but this week surprising many, iraq's prime minister haider al abadi made hopefully what is the first of many efforts aimed at

bringing his country back together with a series of reforms that would as the new york times eloquently put it radically reshape the dysfunctional political system of iraq that has been entrenched since the american led invikings in 2003. will it work? let's bring in two people who know iraq very well. michele flournoy was the highest ranking civilian at the pentagon. she was under consideration for the top job, secretary of defense. the ceo and co-founder for the new center for american security. dexter filkins is the author of the excellent book "the forever war." dexter, you have been in and out of iraq as recently as last year. will what abadi has proposed work? >> i'm pretty pessimistic about it. i think fundamentally the iraqi state is broken, you know. it's broken in three pieces. there is the shiite part and the

kurdish part which is -- they're leaving. and the sunni part i think is irreparably broken away. trying to knit that together, i just don't see it happening. i think, if there was a sense of national feeling, you know, somewhere other than in prime minister abadi's office, i think he is a really serious guy, i would be hopeful about it. we built an iraqi army at incredible expense. billions and billions of dollars. it fell apart. the moment that isis swept in from syria, they just pushed on it and it fell apart. >> it fell apart because the sunnis just don't feel that they want to go to war -- >> here. >> in favor of this bagdad government. they're confronted between isis and the shiite government, many chose isis. >> exactly. they've been so alienated by the shiite majority, particularly by prime minister malaki.

it's a shame we didn't get abadi ten years ago. there is no national feeling. it's gone. i don't think i exists anywhere. and so, what are they doing to do at the end of the day? >> michele, you wrote a very tough paper, i thought, given that you are a former very senior obama official. arguing that the current effort against isis is not working, it's incrementalism. and what you seem to me to be supporting is essentially a recognition that iraq is broken and, you know, frankly a three-pronged strategy where you say outreach to the sunni tribes, in other words, create a self-standing sunni army that will fight isis and then provide arms and aid to the shiite government and its army and the kurdish government and its army. is that a fair reading? you have a little bit about supporting iraqi integration,

which you have to. but -- >> actually, i think we argued in our paper the president's strategy has a lot of the right elements but it's not being pursued with adequate urgency and it's not properly resourced. the most important piece of this aside from the military steps that we can and should take is really making the shia leaders in bagdad not only abadi but especially those behind him to understand that, unless they figure out a way to reinclude the sunnis by devolving more authority and resources down to the provinces they risk losing iraq as a unitary state. they risk having it split. and unless they understand that, they've got to understand that to be able to make the political compromises that are necessary. without that, there are no series of military steps that can really make a difference. with that, additional support from the united states to the kurds and the sunnis and the

iraqi security forces could make a big difference. the question is will the sunnis stand up and fight to reclaim sunni areas. and again, i think they need the reassurance first that they're fighting for a different political future, that things will change in bagdad and they will be re-included. second, that the united states will back them up, that they can count on us to help provide the support they need to be successful. those are two big ifs. >> that is the crucial part i think that michele talked about. will the sunnis fight to reclaim sunni areas. isis is a phenomenon that is because of sunnis of iraq and syria feel disempowered, isis has come in. let's deal with iraq for a moment. will they fight isis, reclaim the areas, and make it part of iraq? >> i -- it's hard to say, but there isn't a lot of evidence that they will. and i think, you know, if you look at, for instance, what --

if you just take the prospect of what happens next, what is the iraqi government doing militarily to push isis back, they want to go into ramadi, which is now held by isis or fallujah or mosul. what will they go in with? they'll go in with the iraqi army which is basically a collection of shiite militias. that's what it is. that's seen as an occupying army. that's not a prescription for reintegration. again, we can cobble together a bunch of sunni tribes and put them on the payroll, and that's basically what -- that helped turn the war back in 2008 when the united states was trying to get out. but that's not a permanent solution. and i just don't -- i don't see it. >> michele, what do you say to that fatalism? >> well, it's hard to be optimistic about iraq, but i am not quite as fatalistic. the question is whether this recent set of protests and this moment, with the support of the

religious leader creates an opportunity for him to push those reforms through and give the sunnis the prospect of a different future in iraq. that is the only way that they will stand up and fight, that plus the assurances from the united states that we'll be behind them. but absent that, i agree. you're not going to see much progress. >> in any event, i think everyone agrees this is the crucial issue, to see whether these reforms work and whether the sunnis can be brought back into the fold. thank you both very much. next on "gps," you have heard of the red planet, you all know about the red sea, but i bet you are not familiar with a nation called the red dot. when we come back, we'll tell you what it is. big day? ah, the usual. moved some new cars. hauled a bunch of steel. kept the supermarket shelves stocked. made sure everyone got their latest gadgets. what's up for the next shift? ah, nothing much. just keeping the lights on.

(laugh) nice. doing the big things that move an economy. see you tomorrow, mac. see you tomorrow, sam. just another day at norfolk southern.

everyone is looking for ways while to cut expenses.s unique, and that's where pg&e's online

business energy checkup tool can really help. you can use it to track your actual energy use. find rebates that make equipment upgrades more affordable. even develop a customized energy plan for your company. think of it as a way to take more control over your operating costs. and yet another energy saving opportunity from pg&e. find new ways to save energy and money with pg&e's business energy check-up.

this week more than four years after the fukushima nuclear disaster japan's nuclear power reactor was brought back online. the move ended a two-year period without any nuclear power in the land of the rising sun. it brings me to my question of the week. what country generates the most nuclear energy? france? china? the united states? or germany? stay tuned and we'll tell you the correct answer. this week's book is "the business of america is lobbying," by a senior fellow at new america. if you were struck as i was by lawrence lessig's commentary on the influence of money in american politics and you want to learn more, you will want to read this book. it lays out the details in an eye-opening way. now for the last look. last weekend the little red dot

celebrated its 50th birthday with pomp and circumstance. the red dot you say? yes. that's the insult that has become a point of pride for singapore. let me explain. it is said that in the 1990s an indonesian leader dismissed the city-state as a little red dot on the map. that phrase transformed into a motto of sorts as reuters points out. the organizers of the event say the dot, seen all over the city, symbolizes singapore's big status as a tiny nation. and this little country has certainly surprised in many ways. singapore is not a western-style liberal democracy. the current ruling party has been in power for the entirety of its independent statehood. when you look at the numbers singapore comes out on top of the united states in a variety of categories. life expectency, higher in singapore. unemployment, lower in singapore. freedom from corruption, better

in singapore according to the right wing heritage foundation. education better with higher oec ratings in math, reading and science. singapore doesn't win in every category. press freedom, worse. freedom overall worse according to freedom house. gum chewing, worse in singapore. yes. buying chewing gum is banned in singapore still. actually some might say that's better. how did this little country that is less free than america do better in so many ways? it's why singapore is so fascinating and worth studying. but this week, let's just celebrate its very real achievements. happy birthday, singapore. the correct answer to our "gps" challenge question is c, the united states. the u.s., with its 100 nuclear reactors provides more than 30% of the world's nuclear generation, according to the world nuclear association. and it accounts for 19% of the electricity to power america's

grid. france has the highest percentage of its power generated by nuclear at about 75%. thanks to all of you for being part of my program this week. i will see you next week. good morning. i'm brian stelter. "reliable sources" will begin in a moment. first there are new developments about the story we've been covering all morning long here on cnn. wreckage has apparently been located from the indonesian passenger plane missing earlier today. the plane was carrying 54 people. it lost contact with air traffic control shortly before its scheduled arrival. cnn's david molko is in spinning apor with the latest. david, there was a press conference held from the local authorities. what are they saying? >> reporter: officials now saying that they believe that there were reports of villagers seeing this plane crash into the side of a mountain,