famous disappear and never be spoken of again. >> reporter: their dancing may be more lawrence welk than it is beyonce. ♪ ♪ >> reporter: but there is a still a blast off. jeanne moos, cnn, new york. >> i want to know what happened to that lead singer. thank you-all for joining us. "ac 360" starts now. thanks for joining us. a striking new development in the san bernardino investigation. we broke the news the husband and wife mass killing may not have been the first deadly act the husband was plotting. we're learning the friend that bought a fair of assault rifles the killer couple used is talking, telling authorities that he and the husband were planning an attack three years ago but called it off. i'll bring you late details on that. we begin tonight with donald trump and the heart burn he's bringing to his own party and the new threats he's now making. two days after unveiling his

plan for keeping any and all muslims from entering the country as immigrants or even visitors, he sat down with done lemon. the interview area tonight at 10:00 a.m. interest eap.m. east. he said maybe donald negotiated a deal with his buddy hillary clinton, continuing this path will put her in the white house and linked to the tweet of you saying that 68% of your supporters would support a third party bid. here is the pledge you signed. you saw this pledge. you know where i'm going. are you going to break the pledge? >> i think it's highly unlikely unless they break the pledge to me because it's a two-way street. they said they will be honorable, the establishment is not exactly being very good to me. but i'm leading in every poll by a lot. it looks like i'm going to win. my whole life has been about winning. i'm not like so many of the other people that you talk to that are essentially losers, okay? i know how to win. i intend to win.

it's the best way of beating the democrats if i get the nomination. in the fox poll that i'm sure you saw, i'm way ahead of hillary, head-to-head i'm ahead of hillary. the one person hillary doesn't want to run against and i get along with democrats, republicans, liberals, everybody. the one person they don't want to run against is me. believe me. >> okay. i want this plain spoken for the viewer. >> go ahead. >> what do you mean when you say if they break this pledge you'll break the pledge? do you mean? >> if they don't treat me with a certain amount of respect and don't treat me as the front runner, by far the front runner and if the playing field isn't level all options are open but that's nothing i want to do. >> how will you know that? determines that? >> i think i'll know that over a period of months and i'll make a determination but i would imagine they would treat me properly because i'm leading by

a lot. >> so the pledge is you keep your word, if they keep their word. >> don, i want to run as a republican. >> here is my question, i said some people were shocked, if you were racist, you knew why i was asking you that, are you racist? >> i'm the least racist person that you have ever met. i am the least racist person. >> are you bigtive in any way. >> i'm a person who happens to be very smart. >> that's donald trump by his own account, very smart and by any account while successful and if you listen to a lot of republican party insiders dangerous, dangerous because what they fear is catastrophic damage he could do to the party and to make matters more complicated or interesting, donald trump doesn't seem to care. these three people do and new hampshire state representative, co-chair of the veterans coalition and washington post conservative columnist kathleen

parker and kevin madden who also happens to be a cnn political commentator. kathleen, you wrote in your column trump is quote the most dangerous person to emerge on the u.s. political scene in decades. i mean, it's one thing to say he's offensive as some have or off putting but to say actually dangerous, how do you back that up? >> he reached the point of being dangerous on multiple levels but i think his -- the way he's speaking about muslims trying to ban them from entry into the country and otherwise marginalizing them is helpful to our enemy because the advantage we had over other countries for example in europe, which have been have suffered more attacks than we have from terrorists is that we have better asemilated people including muslims. what trump is doing by marginalizing them and setting them aside as others that can't be trusted or whatever, he's really kind of creating a second

class citizen shipshship which going to be -- there is a greater risk of being radicalized and recruited by the islamic state. it's a very dangerous movement in terms of our overseas attempts to fight isil and also here in terms of trying to keep muslims included in the country of which they are citizens, by the way, for the most part. so, you know, that's very dangerous but also extremely dangerous in terms of just the republican party. you know, this is the last thing they need is for someone to basically suggest that we are not a welcoming country. we do not bring -- we don't really like people not exactly like us. i'll let others talk. >> you're a trump supporter, i talked to general mark hurtling that served in iraq for years, co commanded u.s. forces for a long time and this is from a strategic standpoint this hurts.

you yourself a veteran hear vice president cheney saying trump's proposal goes against everything we stand for and believe in. what do you say to that? >> you know, i think some of the people need to get their head out of the sand. they use words like decisive, inflammatory, unamerican, dangerous. don't you realize these people in other countries want to kill americans? don't you understand? many of my fellow veterans are being shot at recruiting stations on bases unarmed. i think kathryn needs to, like i said, needs to wake up and small the coffee. it's about time we have a presidential candidate bringing up the issues that are important to the american people, and he's determined to protect the american people. something is wrong with all these talking hits. >> you compared to what franklin roosevelt did to japanese, turning japanese in the united states -- >> do you know why i did it? >> why?

>> let me explain to you why i said that. i utilize the president at the time made a decision he felt was right that's in accordance with the constitution of the safety of the people of the united states. was it a right decision? i think it was a bad decision. but that president at that time did the right decision. what about ol' president carter, what he did. >> sir, you're comparing to something kind of universal described as a black stain in american history, one that ronald reagan himself actually apologized for and paid reparations to the descendants. >> what didn't you understand what i just said? i just said the president at the time who has ultimate -- >> but you're comparing a policy you say you support from donald trump to a decision you say you don't support that was a bad idea so you're saying essentially, what donald trump is doing you're comparing it to what you yourself say is a bad idea. >> no, what i'm saying is at the time, and i wasn't there.

i was young. i was a baby. i don't even think i was born. anyways, at the time the decision was made by a president whose best interest was for the country. history later on makes it whether it was good or bad. at the time, people didn't think it was bad. okay? just like what carter did. i was in the marine corps when they were sending iranian students home. where was the yelling and screaming then? liberals were praising carter. >> actually, a court overturned that and said it was unconstitutional to do that. >> yes, down the road they did that. >> okay. >> so we got two mistakes they regret. >> we regret, that's right. if you look at the national act, immigration act, okay, of 1952, donald trump is 100% right what he said on what he can do on political groups that want to overturn the country. >> sir, i mean, there was a time

when black people didn't have the right to vote in this country and plenty of people thought it was a good idea and in retrospect, people realized that was -- >> in the republicans fixed it. you're right. i agree with you. republicans came forward and fixed it under article 13. >> kevin, i want to get you in on this. what do you think, a, of this idea of trump's and what do you fear it may be doing to the gop? >> well, i very much worry that it ruins the profile of a party that in order to flourish has to be a party of ideas. donald trump doesn't have any ideas. what donald trump has is a lot of inflamed rhetoric. i also think it's a party that ought to be unifying and donald trump is very divisive and donald trump is trying to flourish in this election by segmenting people out and having them fight among each other. that is probably the biggest

challenge that a donald trump candidacy would present to the republican party that we should have learned our lessons from past elections that we need to do a better job of bringing more people into the campaign. he wouldn't do that. i particularly on the ideas part, everybody keeps saying donald trump supporters of donald trump say he's bringing up and talking about the issues people care about. first of all, people have been talking about the issues for a long time but put forward substantive ideas. donald trump merely plays off of people's fears and does it with sound bytes for reality television in a way boardering on fantasia instead of dealing with the real challenges the country faces. >> kathleen, a lot of people agree with donald trump. you look at the polls for his supporters, the idea of banning muslims has a lot of support. >> right. well, he's appealing to this sort of nativest instinct that's common only to a certain percentage of the party -- >> that's not true. >> you talk to people at other levels in the party, not establishment necessarily but people who are actually more

open-minded and more familiar with the constitution and the definition of what it is to be an american. you know, they are not at all interested in seeing a donald trump nomination. so besides which of course he can't win the national election, so it's a pointless endeavor to put him in as a nominee. further more, i would not be surprised, anderson, if you see very soon presidential candidates on the republican sidestepping up to the plate and saying we are not going to support donald trump if he is the nominee. i suspect that's going to start happening fairly soon and that will make -- will change -- >> we've seen some of that. >> representative -- >> to say -- well. >> representative -- >> could i add into this? >> what i want to say, ask you, it seems like support is coming from grass roots from donald trump, a lot of establishment conservatives are pushing back. do you think their opinion doesn't really matter in all this, that the power of center is shifting to the folks who

support trump? >> no. >> you know, as an old marine we go by lessons learned and if you look at what the election -- i've been involved with politics since i was 5 years old. i grew up with tip o'neil. if you look at romney's campaign, they were quiet, nice, gloves were off. times have changed. donald trump is making up lessons learned, is bringing up the issues, if you look at donald trump's campaign supporters in new hampshire, and look at the voting record, we're the real conservatives, we're the real liberty people, we're the real representatives in people concerned with our country. these people are weary about power. >> how is donald trump a real conservative when he is donated and supported the past canada s -- candidacy of harry reid and

been in favor of social medicine. >> i was a state rep sresentati of -- >> these are liberals -- these are the leaders -- >> yes -- >> these are the leaders of liberal -- >> when you're a business person -- >> these are the leaders. >> donald trump -- >> you're a typical -- >> donald trump is not -- >> you lost an election and learned from it. >> representative, you believe donald trump, though, is a true conservative -- >> what is the lesson in supporting nancy pelosi, harry reid and hillary clinton? >> representative? >> you know something? the people, you know, the establishment think the people are stupid. the establishment -- >> no, what is it? how is that conservative? >> donald trump is on his second amendment issue, he's pro-life and wants to build a wall and many talking heads for years -- >> before he was pro-choice.

>> said they would build a wall and nothing. my fellow veterans are dying and the establishment has done nothing. >> representative -- >> it's about time we have somebody that speaks up. >> appreciate you being on, kathleen parker, kevin madden. anti muslim acts like a pig's head thrown at a mosque caught on a surveillance camera. talk to the mayor of philadelphia who has strong words. mayor mike nutter who used blunt and profane language to describe donald trump joins us and breaking news, we wonder why the friend of the male san bernardino killer bought him a pair of assault rifles. now a possible answer ahead.

i am totally blind. and sometimes i struggle to sleep at night, and stay awake during the day. this is called non-24. learn more by calling 844-824-2424. or visit your24info.com. if you have high blood pressure many cold medicines may raise your blood pressure. that's why there's coricidin® hbp. it relieves cold symptoms without raising blood pressure. so look for powerful cold medicine with a heart. coricidin® hbp.

put under a microscope, we can see all the bacteria that still exists. polident's unique micro clean formula works in just 3 minutes, killing 99.99% of odor causing bacteria. for a cleaner, fresher, brighter denture every day. can't afford to let heartburn get in the way? try nexium 24hr, now the #1 selling brand for frequent heartburn. get complete protection with the new leader in frequent heartburn. that's nexium level protection. at ally bank no branches equalsit's a fact.. kind of like mute buttons equal danger. ...that sound good? not being on this phone call sounds good. it's not muted. was that you jason?

it was geoffrey! it was jason. it could've been brenda. amerivest selects the funds and manages your portfolio. is it run by robots? no no, you can talk to a person anytime. 'cause i don't trust robots. right...well, if the portfolio you're invested in doesn't perform well for two consecutive quarters, amerivest will reimburse your advisory fees for those quarters. i wasn't born yesterday. well, actually it looks like you were born yesterday. happy belated birthday. thanks. for all the confidence you need td ameritrade. you got this. i have great credit. how do you know? duh. try credit karma. it's free and you can see what your score is right now . i just got my free credit score! credit karma. really free.

we spoke about the impact of donald trump's words and beyond that lies something far greater, the effect that some believe his rhetoric may be having on how people behave towards muslims especially since the killings in paris and san bernardino. yesterday someone tossed a pig's head at a mosque. eating pork is forbidden in islam. michael nutter singed out donald trump in his plan for some blunt critici criticism. we want to warn you he used rough language to describe him.

>> he's an asshole. i mean, what do you -- i apologize reverends, people in the religious community, i apologize. how can i take seriously any foreign policy idea from someone like him? i mean, it's just impossible. he has no idea what he's talking about. >> mayor nutter also said if he could, he would like to bar donald trump from entering his city. remarks earning him this trump tweet, mayor nutter in philadelphia is doing a terrible job and should be ashamed for using such a word referring to me. low life. calling donald trump an a-hole and madman danger to society, do you stand by what you said? >> well, i said what i said, and i meant it. it was in response to a question about whether president obama was doing enough and donald trump questioning the president's efforts to fight

isis and isil and that was my response. i did apologize to the clergy who were at that press conference, but that's as far as it goes. it was an impromptu remark for the rest of the press conference, i was fully above bored in everything but here is the problem, even leading republicans have denounced the comments by donald trump and as you led into this story, there was a very serious desecration of the mosque and i had asked numerous members from the clergy from a variety of faiths to come which was the primary reason for the press conference. donald trump in his insane remarks were an add on because they all happened about the same time. so the desecration of the mosque is under investigation by the

philadelphia police department and we're seeking answers and we want to get the person who did that hateful action. at the same time, it is not helpful in the rhetoric of whether to campaign or general commentary that a presidential candidate proposes to ban muslims from coming into the united states of america, including those who are already american citizens, some of whom are serving valin the military died for the country and it is just the most insane kind of idea, way beyond american values. donald trump has crossed the traditional american values and is still in a reality tv mode and thinks that all of this is just fun and games. it's not. when you run for a higher office to lead, try to lead the united states of america.

you have to be much more serious in your words and much more sensitive in what you say. >> in terms of words, you also said that conference that quote, he's taken a page from the playbook of hitler, demonized a group and seeked to ban or eliminate that group as part to a solution of a problem that doesn't exist. is that comparing donald trump to hitler? >> the comparison was about the playbook. it was about the actions and that is exactly as students of history know, that is exactly what happened back at that time and other atrocities that have taken place in this world over time. donald trump is trying to demonize muslims, he's trying to demonize the islamic faith and blame this group of people for the problems of our country and then seek to ban or eliminate them from the united states of america. that is an exact page out of that kind of playbook. it is dangerous rhetoric.

it is negative at the highest level and that's not what american politics should be about. the true muslim people in the united states of america and internationally, true followers of islam are peaceful people. they are loving people. they take care of their families and their children. they are an important component of american and international society and he is reckless with his language. we are trying to seriously conduct a presidential election. we have a standing in the world for the many, many things that america does well and we don't always do everything right, but we actually have to -- people pay attention to what happens in the united states of america and pay attention to presidential elections and people who are quote unquote leading in the polls or sucking up every possible piece of air time and he is being reckless and irresponsible. people in his own republican

party are denouncing activities and he will be in new york at a pennsylvania related event you talked about what happened here in philadelphia and he should not be part of that. he needs to apologize to the muslim community and america and internationally. >> mayor, appreciate your time. mayor nutter, appreciate you. we have breaking news, we know who helped the male shooter plan a 2012 attack never carried out. that's what he is telling investigators, whether or not it's true there are questions from investigators themselves. also find out about the questions u.s. officials failed to ask the wife before letting her get a visa into the country. (phone ringing) you can't deal with something by ignoring .t but that's how some presidential candidates seem to be dealing with social security. americans work hard and pay into it, so our next president needs a real plan to keep it strong.

(elephant noise) (donkey noise) hey candidates! answer the call already. some of these experimentse're notmay not work.il. but a few might shape the future. like turning algae into biofuel... ...new technology for capturing co2 emissions... ...and cars twice as efficient as the average car today. ideas exxonmobil scientists are working on to make energy go further... ...no matter how many tries it takes. energy lives here.

hi, i'd like to make a dep-- vo: it happens so often... (box smashing) you almost get used to it. (voice on phone) main menu. representative. please hold-- representative! hello, retirement account number 61414-- here's a retirement plan built just for you. vo: which is why being put first-- you built this just for me? that's how it works. takes some getting used to. not always. join the nation. ♪ nationwide is on your side

there is breaking news in the san bernardino investigation. enrique marquez has been giving up details about a plan he and the alleged shooter planned in 2012 but didn't carry out. investigators are learning more when the couple becape radicalized. some information coming from

marquez himself and details about the vetting of the wife before she was granted the k 1 vista to enter the united states. the pick cuk picture is coming s and pamela brown joins me with the latest. let's talk about this guy enrique marquez and the 2012 plot. >> this is a former neighbor and friend of syed farook, enrique marquez and giving a wealth of information over the last few days and he talked about this 2012 plot the two had in california. he told investigators they had scoped out a target, but that they got spooked because there had been a round of terror related arrests in that area and decided not to move forward with it. this is the same person, anderson, who bought guns around that time, those two ar-15s he gave them to farook. the guns were later used in the san bernardino attack but marquez denies any involvement and told investigators he was radicalized as early as 2011.

it's important to point out he checked himself into a mental health hospital after the attack. officials need to corroborate what he's telling them verify the details which is difficult to do. also important to point out that investigators are looking at the circumstances surrounding the marriage to a woman of russian descent. that is under scrutiny. this woman came to the u.s. from russia in 2009 and according to a law enforcement officials, they are looking into whether their marriage was legit. she didn't show up for her appointment this week with an i'm gre immigration official, anderson. >> there is questions about tashfeen malik's visa application interview. >> we're learning that farook's wife tashfeen malik was not asked about jihad when met in person with the u.s. counselor for an interview in pakistan last year, this official says that this is not mandatory, that line of questioning be asked unless red flags came up during the dhs check before the

interview, but both state department and dhs say this is a shared responsibility. plenty of blame to go around here. the bottom line is with the fiancee visa, sh they are more focused if this relationship is legitimate. >> even though they have background checks for the process, it's about whether or not the marriage is legitimate and not political meanings of somebody or religious meanings. we also learned today the fbi believes two attackers were radicalized before they even met which is really interesting. >> that's right. we've been reporting, anderson, it's believed they have been radicalized before isis came onto the stage and james comey is saying that they have uncovered online communications between the two of them from late 2013 before they even began dating and met. they were discussing jihad apparently. clearly, this is something that goes back several years. we know investigators found data on a tablet computer, other cell

phones at the couple's home and the fbi has benefits from data from u.s. intelligence agencies but haven't been able to retrieve data from the two damaged cell phones in the trash can and haven't found the hard drive from the house, anderson. >> pam, thanks for the reporting. the picture coming into focus gets more disturbing now that we know the killers were radicalized before they met and planned the deadly attack with the husband's hmother and hard o believe no one around them knew what was going on. everyone is on board with alerting authorities to potential threats. hirsi ali the founder at aha foundation. i spoke with her earlier today. it's interesting, there's now reporting that fbi director saying there was talk of jihad online between these two around 2013. >> yes. >> and now this neighbor,

there -- he claims there was a potential plot in 2012 this is before isis. >> that's before the caliphate was declared. >> what does that tell you? >> that's to say they were radicalized by isis but means they were radical before that. what it tells me is what i have been telling you and everyone else all along, that hundreds and hundreds of thousands of muslims are radicalized. >> around the world. >> around the world and in the united states of america, as well. and the big question for us is and again, i don't like the word radical or radicalized. these are people who have become for pious and tend to observe islam literally and take the koran literally and observe, they try to follow in the example of the prophey muhammad literally. that's what we call radical in extreme. that, the people who have that mentality and that mind set are not a minority and not a fringe

minority. >> and they don't necessarily need a group like isis, i mean, that might sort of give them focus and might give them a name to claim allegiance to but i mean, as you said, this was happening before isis had a caliphate. >> exactly. i think these people were already -- they already believed what they executed and i think the big problem is because the number of people who believe in this within muslim communities and families definitely not all but it is so large, these individuals who want to take, you know, an action, to take it beyond believing and beyond practicing but actually want to kill people, they have a large enough group to hide in. >> do you believe, i mean, when people say look, we had id no i, friends, family, hard to believe somebody comes up with an idea like this, plan like this and doesn't talk to others about it whether they believe they will act out or not or whether they are somewhat sympathetic or

whatever the case may be. >> i don't believe it. it is the same because some of the families say when their children sneak off to isis and they are caught at an airport or gone and say my goodness, i didn't know my child was planning to do this. i think that there is a great deal and here is, you know, the uncomfortable truth really, there is a great deal of consensus in terms of belief. the family or some of the family members may not want themselves to execute an act of jihad but if a fellow believer is doing that and he's investing, then who are you as a believer to stop him or even worse, to report him to the infidelity authorities? it's once you understand that mentality and that process, then we can get to okay, how can we, how can we perhaps persuade people these ideas are bad? to do that, we have to call a spade a spade. >> and you hear donald trump say

ban all muslims from coming to the united states until we figure out what the heck is going on, what that means, what do you think? >> i was a politician and i know that when a politician or a candidate says, makes remarks like this, and it resonates, it's not only what the candidate is saying, what i think of it is i think it's a bad idea. i don't think we should do what trump is saying. if we could do it, i don't think we can, but i think it's a bad approach and it's gives a false promise where a large number of american voters think that if they elect trump, that he has the solution to this long-term i ideal logical war. >> thank you. more breaking news about the san bernardino terrorist killers. new questions tonight about whether their march rriage was designed for terror and how they exploited the u.s. visa system

to carry out their deadly attack. ...we've helped our investors stay confident for over 75 years. call us or your advisor. t. rowe price. invest with confidence. i am totally blind. and sometimes i struggle to sleep at night, and stay awake during the day. this is called non-24. learn more by calling 844-824-2424. or visit your24info.com.

more breaking news as we reported earlier, the female shooter in the san bernardino terror attack was not asked about jihadist leanings when be interviewed after applying for a k 1 visa. questions whether the marriage was a sham. tom foreman joins us with a closer look how you get k 1 visas. how does the process work? >> anderson, if an american wants to marry the citizen of another country and bring them, they need a fiancee visa and starts with stack of paperwork. nine pages of instructions and six pages to be filled out and what does the government want to know? a sponsor, the person here is a u.s. citizen and want to know the couple is planning to marry within 90 days and need evidence of a real relationship and at least have seen each other in person once in the past two

years. beyond that they require a valid passport for the person coming in, birth certificate, divorce or death certificate for any previous spouse and police certificates from every place this foreign person liveed to make sure they are not a criminal. they need medical records to prove this person coming in does not have a disease and evidence of income so we're not talking about a couple not able to support itself. get through that and the couple will pay a $340 filing fee and fingerprinting and bio pmet tricks and extensive background checks to make sure they know who this person is and if you make it through that, you get to an actual face-to-face interview with this person at an embassy or consulate some where in the country where they will really probe into all of these answers and all of these details to find out is this really the person we think it is and are they really coming for the reason intended? anderson? >> it's really focused on whether it's a legitimate

marriage, not so much it seems the political believes or the perhaps radical believefs of a person, they can't really do a full background check because they don't have access to the intelligence service in syria or pakistan or wherever it may be. >> you're absolutely right and it is a fast process compared to other visas. about a year, maybe more, maybe less depending on the specifics. obviously they would like to catch any misrepresentations or flags about bigger problems out there. but i will note, not a whole lot of these are approved. if you look back here in 2004, about 29,000, a little under back then, it's moved up and there is a spike last year to about 44,000 but people have been through this say it really is a pretty rigorous process and these numbers point to the fact that it's not so easily used for improper or illegal purposes. anderson? >> tom, thanks very much.

joining me now chris and back baer and executive sean henry. chris, how big a security risk do you think are these fiancee visas because again, it seems like whatever checks are done, it focuses on whether the march r -- marriage is legitimate. >> i think it's a gaping hole in the immigration system. gosh, they don't ask the question or don't question where she came from knowing full well that it's a terrorist breeding ground. you know, i'm just baffled by the whole thing, anderson. even though they went through some sort of due diligence vetting process, it was focused on the wrong things it seems to me. >> bob, even in a case and i think you and i have talked before but in a case where say she was from pakistan, if there is not cooperation, how effective can any background screening be? >> exactly, anderson. the person shows up at your

window and you ask where are you from? very cursory these interviews and even if you ask whether they are radicalized, they will say no and pakistanis don't give us the file of people they suspect are radicalized, a bunch of countries don't so we're at the mercy of whatever this person says, you know, and if she had said i'm not radicalized, i'm just a believer and that's it. the visa officer has to accept that and these things are all approved basically. these k visas for american citizens, it's a huge gaping hole of getting people in this country. if she was sent, these people are smart. >> chris, the new information today about the couple's neighbor saying he was part of a planning of a potential attack as far back as 2012, what do you make of that? first of all, the fbi is cautions this guy checked himself into a mental facility, mental health facility shortly after the attacks and it's not

clear, i mean, if he's being on the up and up or got some other problems going on, but what do you make of it? >> well, if everything that we're hearing is true, anderson, i don't think -- and that they did try to select targets in 2012 and marquez was fully aware of the intense radicalization of farook, it's not a question whether he'll get charged but when and how much consideration they will give him for cooperation because that's full knowledge and provides him with two ar-15 s. he's definitely an aider and abetter based on the facts i've heard if true. >> yeah, i mean, chris, it goes beyond somebody who says well, i heard him say some things but didn't really know. if they in fact did plan or openly talk about, you know, having attacked themselves and to arm this guy, it does seem like he would be culpable, no? >> looks like -- i mean, at the bare minimum, aider and abetter

but maybe co-conspirator. he may have struck a deal. they will talk to him and listen to him but at some point, he's going to end up in handcuffs if what we're hearing is actually true and i think some of it is. >> sean, there's reports they got information from electronic intercepts. how likely is that? how important do you think that could be? >> intercept prior or post? >> i believe prior, i believe. >> yeah, so if they are talking about electronic intercept -- >> the information is thin on it i should say. >> if they are electronic intercepts that occurred prior to the incident, then the question is going to be where were they? were they analyzed? who took a look at them. and what followup may have been done from that, anderson. as you know, the intelligence component of this is so critical in preventing any type of attack, the ability to intercept

communications and use it for lead purposes from a disruptive perspective is really critical. >> bob, when it comes to the timing of when these two individuals were radicalized, i mean, well before the islamic state had a caliphate before they were considered a major terror threat on the radar but not to the degree certainly they didn't have the power they do now in the region, what does that tell you that, i mean, i just find it interesting it may not have been isis per se that made them, that got them radicalized but just decided to -- they became radicalized and decided isis is the best ones to pledge alliance to? >> well, anderson, this doesn't surprise me at all. we spend way too much time parsing these groups, the difference between al qaeda and muslim brotherhood and isis and the rest of it and the fact is that jihad militant jihad is just jihad and you can sort of pick and choose what group you

want to bring to. she may have come here as a follower. it's a militant group in pakistan, very violent. she may have been recruited by them, got here and decided well, the most propaganda value is the islamic state and she did that facebook posting in the middle of the attack, which scared a lot of americans. what she believed in who knows but it's the idea of violence that these people adhere to and the defense of their form of islam and that's all they care about. they don't care about organizations. >> bob baer and sean henry, thank you. anger on the streets of chicago. protesters denmanding the resignation of the mayor. details on that next.

when emergency room doctors choose an otc pain reliever for their patients muscle, back and joint pain. the medicine in advil is their #1 choice. nothing is stronger on tough pain than advil. relief doesn't get any better than this. advil. ♪ ♪

this is a body of proof. proof of less joint pain. and clearer skin. this is my body of proof that i can fight psoriatic arthritis with humira. humira works by targeting and helping to block a specific source of inflammation that contributes to both joint and skin symptoms. it's proven to help relieve pain, stop further joint damage and clear skin in many adults. doctors have been prescribing humira for 10 years. humira can lower your ability to fight infections, including tuberculosis. serious, sometimes fatal infections and cancers, including lymphoma, have happened, as have blood, liver and nervous system problems, serious allergic reactions, and new or worsening heart failure. before treatment, get tested for tb. tell your doctor if you've been to areas where certain fungal infections are common, and if you've had tb, hepatitis b, are prone to infections, or have flu-like symptoms or sores.

don't start humira if you have an infection. want more proof? ask your rheumatologist about humira. humira. this is my body of proof! and my brother ray and i started searching for answers. (vo) when it's time to navigate in-home care, follow that bright star. because brightstar care earns the same accreditation as the best hospitals. and brightstar care means an rn will customize a plan that evolves with mom's changing needs. (woman) because dad made us promise we'd keep mom at home. (vo) call 844-4-brightstar for your free home care planning guide.

quite a day in chicago, hundreds of protesters marched demanding the resignation of rob emanuel. the demonstrator had 16 shots and a coverup. the protest started just minutes after the mayor apologized how the city and mayor handled the death. what was it like out there, martin? >> reporter: well, good evening, anderson. protest by the way, continuing just outside the chicago police headquarters. there's a monthly meeting going on and protesters are definitely inside there. many of those who are inside now were out on the streets earlier today. and it was impressive for how long it went on.

this started at noon shortly after the mayor as you know made his apology but it seemed that the more attention that the protesters got, the more that they carried on. it went for five hours. and it went through some of the most important neighborhoods of downtown chicago including the gold coast, probably one of the most affluent areas including miracle mile disrupting traffic and definitely causing or attracting the attention of many bystanders but it also seemed to be in kind of a loose coordination with the police department. not the cooperation but clearly police were there in the same numbers as protesters, about 200 and blocking intersections and leaping ahead to block other intersections. there were a couple people detained but after that, they were pretty much saying that those people who were held were released and it ended all very peacefully. they want ron emanuel to leave but so far, ron emanuel the

mayor has not done that. >> martin salve vague. thank you. a lot more happening tonight. randi kaye has the news and business bulletin. anderson, one of the six baltimore officers charged in the april death of freddie gray took the stand. william porter testified he didn't realize gray was injured until the final stop of the van ride. mr. gray suffered a broken neck during that ride. porter is the first officer to stand trial. in a colorado courtroom prosecutors filed 179 felony charges against robert lewis dear accused of killing three people at a planned parenthood clinic in colorado springs. dear disrupted the hearing repeatedly at one point saying i am a warrior for the babies. and 65 boston college students who got sick after eating at a chipotle restaurant in boston have tested positive for the norovirus. more than 120 students in all became ill and e. coli outbreak linked to other chipotle restaurants made people sick, anderson, in at least nine

states since october. >> thanks very much. we'll be right back. woman: it's been a journey to get where i am. and i didn't get here alone. there were people who listened along the way. people who gave me options. kept me on track. and through it all, my retirement never got left behind. so today, i'm prepared for anything

we may want tomorrow to be. every someday needs a plan. let's talk about your old 401(k) today. the way i see it, you have two choices; the easy way or the hard way. you could choose a card that limits where you earn bonus cash back. or, you could make things easier on yourself. that's right, the quicksilver card from capital one. with quicksilver you earn unlimited 1.5% cash back on every purchase, everywhere. so, let's try this again. what's in your wallet? to prove to you that aleve is the better choice this is claira. for her she's agreed to give it up. that's today? we'll be with her all day to see how it goes. after the deliveries, i was ok. now the ciabatta is done and the pain is starting again. more pills? seriously? seriously.

all these stops to take more pills can be a pain. can i get my aleve back? for my pain, i want my aleve. get all day minor arthritis pain relief with an easy open cap. i absolutely love my new but the rent is outrageous. good thing geico offers affordable renters insurance. with great coverage it protects my personal belongings should they get damaged, stolen or destroyed. [doorbell] uh, excuse me. delivery. hey. lo mein, szechwan chicken, chopsticks, soy sauce and you got some fortune cookies. have a good one. ah, these small new york apartments... protect your belongings. let geico help you with renters insurance.

that does it for our broadcast tonight. thanks for watching. we'll see you again at 11:00 p.m. eastern for another edition of "360." this is life with lisa ling starts now. ♪ ♪ hey, real quick, you're absolutely adorable. >> it's saturday afternoon in las vegas. >> you-all are highly distracting. there is something about you. i had to come over and say hello. >> i'm watching something unusual. >> your girlfriend is beautiful, man. where did you meet her? >> see the guy in gray. that's josiah, he's here to pick up women while i listen in. >> real quick, this is totally random but you're cute as hell. i had to say hi. >> his lines