. live from cnn's world headquarters in atlanta, welcome to our viewers in the united states and around the world. >> we have new developments in our breaking news on u.s. president's donald trump's travel ban affecting seven muslim majority countries. the white house has now suffered its second defeat in two days over the ban. the u.s. appeals court has just denied a department of justice

request to immediately stop a judge's suspension of the ban. that means the trump travel ban will remain on hold for now. the court has asked for both sides to file legal briefs before the court makes additional decisions. >> cnn u.s. justice reporter laura jarrett is on the phone with us now from washington. you have been watching the twists and turns of this legal drama. what do you make of what's just happened? >> reporter: this is pretty incredible, robin. just shortly after midnight on sunday we saw the justice department file an emergency request within the ninth circuit, the court of appeals, asking essentially to press pause on the sweeping division that came out of that seattle court on friday evening. and then just a few hours ago, actually i should say an hour ago, the court of appeals for the ninth circuit has responded and said in short we need

further briefing on this. we cannot give you your emergency administrative relief. we need to hear from the other side. so we'll see full briefing from the plaintiff in that case, the state attorney general and then we will hear again from the justice department on monday afternoon. >> so what this means for homeland security, for example, is that for the moment business as usual. anybody from anywhere where a valid u.s. visa, even if you're on that list of seven countries, can still come into the u.s. >> reporter: that's correct. as of right now, judge robart's order, the seattle court judge, his ruling is in full effect. and so everything that has started on saturday morning where dhs, i should say homeland security and the state department has started to roll back some of the implementation

of the travel ban. all of that that was happening on saturday morning is still going to move forward as long as judge robart's order is in full effect. >> but also this is still pending these legal briefs that want to be examined, so it could be slapped back on by monday. >> reporter: well, that's right. we just don't know . it's sort of a legal ping pong, if you will, right now in the courts trying to keep up with this. as of right now it appears as if the court of appeals, the higher court that evaluates the seattle court, says we need to take a step back and we need full briefing before we can decide. >> this is not the first time a president has issued a controversial executive order. it's certainly not the first time the courts have pushed back on that. why is this such a problem? why are we seeing this legal ping pong, as you say? >> reporter: i think it has to do with the fact that the order itself, the way it was crafted

originally last week was quite wrought. last week there was a whole question of whether green card holders were included. and then we saw the white house change course on that. and in the intervening time, this whole week we've seen just a cottage industry of lawsuits being filed all over the country. and so as a result, you have sort of a patchwork going on here, right? you have rulings in new york which say you can't deport people. you have rule innining in bostog we can have a temporary restraining order but only a certain amount of time but the seattle court said i am putting a nation wise hal on the travel ban. >> the legal defenses on this bill for and against have been quite specific, have been quite narrow, but broadly there is also going to be the requesty o

not only was that executive order badly implemented, but is it constitutional. >> reporter: that's exactly right. we haven't even gotten to the larger question of the constitutionality of this order. every court so far has been dealing just in the very administrative early stages trying to figure out do we need to use a temporary restraining order while we figure that out. so the temporary restraining order just gives some immediate relief to press pause on what's going to happen in terms of the implementation of this executive order. but the constitutionality of the order hasn't been reached yet. courts so far have just said the plaintiffs show a likelihood of success on the merits. but that's just an initial finding. it doesn't reach the ultimate question of whether this entire order is constitutional. >> thanks so much. laura barrett in washington

giving us her perspective. >> we've got a lot of questions on this. troy slayton joins us from los angeles. i want to point out that we are getting information on the washington state attorney general's twitter page. he too is confirming that the stay has been denied. there you can read the trump administrations request for immediate administration stay denied f. y denied. if you want the full text, it's on the twitter page. troy, it seems to me there are a series, and we've got to make this clear to viewers, a series of bigger legal battles that are going to be fought. >> there are. this is just a small step. what the ninth circuit court of appeals has said here is that the judge robart's order stands. and the executive order cannot be enforced as of right now.

that could change by monday afternoon when president trump is to respond to the state's attorney general reply to their request for the immediate stay of that temporary restraining order. i know that sounds like a mouthful, but basically, in simple term, the court wants to hear more before it makes its final decision about whether or not judge robart's order stands. >> for travelers wanting to come to the u.s. who are or have been affected by the travel ban and are wondering what this means for them, just to be chrrystal clear, that means currently the travel ban is not in effect, but could it come back into effect? >> it could. right now the department of homeland security has taken steps immediately after judge robart's decision to sort of unwind those actions and the executive order rather and we're

really now at the status quo before the executive order was signed. >> and when might the status quo change? when will we have an answer on that? >> we could have an answer as early as monday afternoon. because this three-judge panel is going to make a decision probably by monday afternoon, maybe a day later, when they're going to have to decide whether or not they're going to stop judge robart's temporary restrain order or let it stay in place. if it stays in place, then the executive cannot be enforced. if it's lifted, then we'll see the executive order pop right back into place. >> and laura jarrett, our u.s. justice reporter, was reminding us just a second ago that there have been, you know, federal -- several multiple federal judges who have actually ruled on this

issue. >> yes. >> so how could those various legal proceedings interact? >> judge robart's decision was the most sweeping out of all of them them. it's his decision that says it applies nationwide and effectively blocked the implementation and execution of that executive order. now, there was a judge out of massachusetts that said -- that denied the request for a temporary restraining order to do this same exact thing. so the bottom line is we're going to see this play out in the lower courts and the united states supreme court is going to have to weigh in eventually to solve it and decide it rather once and for all. >> but at some point what we're seeing happen and this case that was the suit that was filed by

the states of washington and minnesota, could that be over ridden by what's going on either in massachusetts or new york or another state? >> no. the circuits act independently and it happens very often that one circuit may make a decision that is completely opposite and contrary to what another circuit decides. and in that case, that is the exact type of case that the united states supreme court wants to take up. right now we have an eighth person united states supreme court. they could end up ruling 4-4 on one of these cases that makes their way up to them in which case the lower court's decision would stand. >> and if we step back a bit on the over arching question of whether this is actually legal, who do you think ultimately

wins? >> in my opinion, i believe that president trump prevails, because i believe that the congress has given authority to the president to decide which class of aliens could be admissible. this is a matter of national security and immigration enforcement which the president has plenary powers to decide. i don't even think this executive order was absolutely necessary for the trump administration to accomplish their goals. i think this was a lot of window dressing because even without this executive order, the president retains power and the executive branch retains so much power to decide who comes in and who doesn't to this country. >> troy, just one last thing. is it possible that we could have a case whereby ultimately

within possible years the u.s. supreme court hands a legal victory to donald trump and that executive order is deemed legal, but in the interim, the executive order cannot be applied by law? in other words, for one, two, three years he can't apply this executive order, but down the line he's actually proven to be right? >> yeah. and the same thing happened with president obama. it took several years to decide on the issue of recess appointments, on the issue of some of his executive orders. and yeah, that's the way that it works. i mean, justice isn't always swift in this country. but that's why we've seen why so many people who follow that, so many legal observers like myself are amazed that the ninth circuit made this decision in hours. and that's because the ninth

circuit knows that the world is watching and people around the world are relying on some sort of semblance of knowing what to do in this situation. and some sort of semblance of normal see. and that's probably how the ninth circuit worked so quickly. >> so glad to have you with us this hour to make sense of this. let's get some international perspective from scott lucas, university of birmingham in england. we've just heard the legal experts trying to understand the twists and turns in this. many of our viewers who are watching around the world probably had a few raised eyebrows in the last day or two. >> i think there have been raised eyebrows ever since this executive order was issued on january 27th. it was so sweeping affects tens of thousands of people who already had visas that it raised

concerns from europe to the middle east to asia. indeed that uncertainty continues because although the executive order has been suspended, you're seeing some passengers who are now scrambling to get into the united states while there's a window who have visa is. how long that window is open is dependent on what happens in the circuit court. >> and the messages, the optics of all of this? >> it's terrible. the message in terms of american image a broad is that this so-called soft power of american freedom, american values, has just been tram pelled underfoot. the way it was done in the executive order that a few men in the white house, a president and a couple advisors, against their own agencies, against their attorney general has pushed through a ban that

appears to be drirected at muslims. when you get to areas like the middle east that's a damaging message if you're trying to say america is here to help with these conflicts rather than to contribute. >> what we've seen president trump took power is an increased uncertainty, increased instability in terms of trying to understand exactly what his administration's next moves are going to be. some suggest that is a policy that is their vision in many ways. others suggest it is just about inexperience. either way, having america as a predictable institution, a predictable part of the world of order seems to throw everything into question. >> you're absolutely right. stability is what the world counts on even if they disagree with american policies. that stability is outside the window because you've got a president who has a shotgun approach not only to policy but to what he says about it. quite often insulting other

countries, other people. and you've got strategies like steve bannon who i think are being seen as having an agenda which is directed to a minority in the u.s. to extend their power and the rest of the world can just be damned. compact that with the fact that president trump has just praised vladimir putin of russia, giving him high praise while casting doubts on nato and european countries, while casting doubt on what the u.s. should do in the middle east and you've got the recipe for turmoil. >> international perspective from scott lucas. thank you so much. you're watching cnn. more news after the break. i became curious where in africa she was from. so i took the ancestry dna test to find out more about my african roots. ancestry really helped me fill in a lot of details.

parts a and b and want more coverage, guess what? you could apply for a medicare supplement insurance plan whenever you want. no enrollment window.

no waiting to apply. that means now may be a great time to shop for an aarp medicare supplement insurance plan, insured by unitedhealthcare insurance company. medicare doesn't cover everything. and like all standardized medicare supplement insurance plans, these help cover some of what medicare doesn't pay. so don't wait. call now to request your free decision guide. it could help you find the aarp medicare supplement plan that works for you. these types of plans have no networks, so you get to choose any doctor who accepts medicare patients. rates are competitive, and they're the only plans of their kind endorsed by aarp. remember - these plans let you apply all year round. so call today. because now's the perfect time to learn more. go long.

curn welcome back, everyone. there are breaking dw developme the fight over the u.s. travel ban involving seven muslim majority nations. >> they have denied the -- it's asking the justice tpt and the states of washington and minnesota which requested the suspension to file legal briefs. >> president trump tells fox news now in a brand new interview that he respects russian president vladimir putin. >> mr. trump acknowledges putin

may be a killer, but responded, we've got a lot of killers. listen. >> can you respect putin? >> i do respect him. >> do you? why? >> well, i respect a lot of people but that doesn't mean i'm going to get along with him. he's a leader of his country. i say it's better to get looalo with russia than not. will i get along with him. >> putin is a killer. >> we've got a lot of killers. you think our country is so innocent? >> let's go straight to moscow. claire sebastian is standing by. claire, what do comments like that mean to the russian public? is it music to their ears? >> reporter: well, i mean, i think there's a sense of cautious optimism in russia about the future of the u.s. russian relationship, but the most striking thing about these comment system how closely they resemble the kind of rhetoric we have seen over many years from the kremlin.

others call it what aboutism. weaver seen it from president putin actions in cry imea. look at the divisiveness of the u.s. election. as for an official reaction here in moscow, nothing as of yet. it's around lunchtime on a sunday, so fairly quiet. but just to give you a sense of the feeling here about the russia/u.s. relationship there are comments today from the foreign minister. he said they're waiting to see how the key members of the trump administration are going to define it. they are watching and waiting how things unfold. >> watching and waiting as well is the ukranian president, the ukrainian people want to see the

impact this administration will have on them. there was a phone call today. do we know what was said in it? >> it was a very closely watched phone call here in moscow. we know what they chose to tell us in the statement out from the white house, a very short one saying that this was a very good phone call according to mr. trump and the u.s. has pledged to work with russia, ukraine and all sides resolving that conflict. they said they were going to meet at some point. much longer, much more detailed statement from the office pointing to the devastation, the dama damage, a government-held down. didn't talk about any damage in any rebel-held area. the ukrainian side said they expressed to mr. trump said they appreciated the u.s. commentment and perhaps a reference to the very stern comments we heard this week from the u.s.'s un

ambassador nikki haley saying russia was to blame for the violence in eastern ukraine and no sanctions should be lifted. difficult to know exactly how that conversation went from those two statements but suddenly the ukranian side are trying to draw out all the positives they can. >> laying it all out for us from russia. >> and that's the latest on how the u.s./russia relationship is involving. how is the u.s./iran relationship stacking up? some harsh words for tehran calling it the biggest sponsor for terrorism. >> a day after the u.s. placed sanctions against iran. day as ever the trump's administration said it's placing iran on notice. nick robertson has more. >> with the tension on this, the

rhetoric and the actions with iran really team soto be ratcheting up. you have one saying iran's is the world's biggest sponsor of terrorism, a very strong statement. you have within hours after that the commander of the aerospace part of the islamic r revolutionary guard core, saying if the enemy makes a mistake our missiles will come raining down on their heads. but at the same time over the weekend iran has begun military drills by aerospace section of the elite force. testing their electronic counter mesh systems. very clear message if there is any kind of military action, aircraft flying into iran's air space, if there is any kind of

milita military action, rairan is read for it. president trump and his spokesman have been very clear the united states not taking anything off the table in their potentially actions against iran. at the moment, the tensions, the rhetoric, the actions just keep es escalating. >> thanks for that report. a u.s. appeals court has just denied a justice department effort to end the suspension of the u.s. travel ban. stay with us. odorless and fast-. it soothes all my muscle aches and pains. and it's convenient for those hard to reach places. and if you're like me, you'll love blue-emu super strength cream. it's made with real emu oil, it's non greasy, it's a deep penetrating formula that works itself down into your joints. take it from me. it works fast and you won't stink. blue-emu, it works for me it'll work for you.

so welcome back to our viewers in the united states and around the world. you're watching cnn. i'm rob iin curnow. >> we're following breaking news of the legal value over donald trump travel ban on seven majority countries and refugees. the ninth circuit court of appeals has just donenied a -- >> the court has asked for both sides to file legal briefs before it makes additional decisions. cnn u.s. justice reporter laura jarrett on is the phone with us.

what do you make of what's just happened? >> this is pretty incredible, robyn. just shortly after midnight on sunday we saw the justice department file an emergency request within the ninth circuit, the court of appeals asking essentially to press pause on the sweeping decision that came out of that seattle court on friday evening. then just a few hours ago, actually i should say an hour ago, the court of appeals for the ninth circuit has responded and said in short we need further briefing on this. we cannot give you your emergency administrative relief. we need to hear from the other side. so what we're now going to see is more full briefing from the plaintiffs in that case who were the state attorney general and then we will hear again from the justice department on monday afternoon. >> so what this means for

homeland security, for example, administering the entry and exits of america's borders is that for the moment business as usual. anybody from anywhere with a valid u.s. visa even if you're on that list of seven countries can still come into the u.s. >> that's correct. as of right now, judge robart's order, the seattle court judge, his ruling is in full effect and so everything that has started on saturday morning where dhs, i should say homeland security and the state department have started to roll back some of the implementation of the travel ban, all of that that was happening on saturday morning is still going to move forward as long as judge robart's order is in full effect. >> but also this is still pending these legal briefs that want to be examined, so it could be slapped back on by monday. >> well, that's right. we just don't know. it's sort of a legal ping pong, if you will, right now in the

court trying to keep up with this. but as of right now it appears that the court of appeals, the higher court that evaluates that seattle court, is saying we need to take a step back here and we need full briefing on this before we can decide. >> this is not the first time a president has issued a controversial executive order. it's certainly not the first time the courts have pushed back on that. why is this such a problem? why are we seeing this legal ping pong as you say? >> i think it has to do with the fact that the order itself, the way it was crafted originally last week was quite wrought. so you remember last week there was a whole question of whether green card holders were included. and then we saw the white house change course on that. and in the intervening time, this whole week we've seen just a cottage industry of lawsuits being filed all over the country. and so as a result, you have

sort of a patchwork going on here, right? you have rulings in new york which say you can't deport people. you have rulings in boston saying well, we can have a temporary restraining order, but only until a certain amount of time. but the seattle court was the one who really took things a step further and i said i am putting a nationwide halt on this travel ban. >> a lot of these as you say a patchwork of legal defenses against this bill, for and against, have been quite specific, have been quite narrow. but broadly there is also going to be the question on not only was that initial executive order badly implemented, but is it constitutional. >> that's exactly right. we haven't even gotten to the larger question of the constitutionality of this order, right? every court so far has been dealing just in the very administrative early stages trying to figure out do we need to use a temporary restraining

order while we figure that out, right? so the temporary restraining order just gives immediate relief to press pause on what's going to happen in terms of the implementation of this executive order. but the constitutionality of the order hasn't been reached yet. courts so far have just said the plaintiffs show a likelihood of success on the merits. but that's just an initial findi finding. it doesn't reach the ultimate question of whether this entire order is constitutional. >> thanks so much, laura, in washington giving us your perspective. thank you. well, washington state's attorney general had a simple response to the denial of the stay saying the ruling speaks for itself. he also tweeted trump's administration's request for immediate administrative stay denied. >> protests against president trump's travel ban have drawn the cameras, but those angry with president trump's policies are only one side of the

national mood. >> many americans are behind mr. trump 100%. cnn jason carroll met some of them in wisconsin, a state that was key to getting donald trump elected in the first place. >> trying to bring business back to the united states. >> reporter: when you look at the reason why donald trump unexpected flipped the state of wisconsin, look no further than this bar right outside of milwaukee milwaukee. it caters to a lot of harley-davidson employees that come to the plant from a few miles away. the patrons have plenty of praise for the president and find little pause for them protesting against him. >> get over it. he's in. just stop it. >> kim owns this bar and says her feelings mirror those of many in the community, a community that voted for trump over hillary clinton by nearly two to one. donny is a trump supporter. he says he worked at harley dave son for more than 40 years before he retired and was also a

good business owner. >> it cost me a good businesslike a bar like this. certain people move in an area and then they move out. >> you mean certainly people who look like me or -- >> l the neighborhood changed, like, 90% within two years. some people wouldn't come in and i had to sell it. >> when going forward, does it leave with you an unfavorable view of black people, mexican people? >> yes t doe, it does. i'll be honest with you. i'm very prejudice and a lot of people know that. >> he says his point of view is unedited, one that few people like him share publicly. >> do you believe a lot of people who feel the way you do also voted for trump because they feel the way you do? >> they do. trust me. >> they say they don't share his

views and they welcome all who come to the bar no matter their race, but they support trump and are happy with what they've seen so far. >> he is backing up what he had said. he's finally standing up for america, for the citizens of america, for small businesses, for whoeverybody who voted for . >> they also hope the president will keep pressuring u.s. companies to make more products in the united states. harley-davidson assembles bikes in the united states but makes many parts overseas in countries like mexico. the head of the local steelworkers union is encouraged by trump pulling out of the trans pacific partnership which he says was not good for u.s. workers, but he's personally tru troubled by the immigration ban. >> the statute of liberty says welcome and i believe that's the

way it should be. >> patrons such as danny are on board with what trump has done so far and hopes he continues to fulfill his promises. >> i hope he gets another four years after this one. better than democrats. >> our jason carroll reporting there. stay with us. we're back right after this. but your position here has been made redundant. what? who's replacing me? splenda naturals? well... she's made with stevia. come on! stevia has a bitter aftertaste. hold on. splenda naturals is not bitter. she's as sweet as sweet can be, and calorie-free. again with the calories? it turns out people don't want extra calories. so that's it? no, we made you a cake. with sugar? oh, no. (laughing)

with sugar? ...another anti-wrinkle cream in no hurry to make anything happen. neutrogena® rapid wrinkle repair works... ...in one week. with the... fastest retinol formula available. it's clinically proven to work on fine lines and... ...even deep wrinkles. "one week? that definitely works!" rapid wrinkle repair. and for dark spots, rapid tone repair. neutrogena®. "see what's possible."

back to our breaking news out of the u.s. and another

setback for the u.s. president's controversial travel ban. >> a u.s. appeals court has denied a department of justice request to immediately restore the ban. >> that ban denied refugees and citizens from seven muslim-majority countries this beans the ban, the travel ban, will remain on hold for now. joining us now from istanbul in turk turkey. it's sunday lunchtime. there hasn't been a lot of reaction to twists and turns. what are you hearing from the region? >> reporter: well, i think, robyn, to sum up the reaction in this region, it's confusion and uncertainty. people a week ago waking up to the news that, you know, tens of millions of people coming from these sech countriven countries allowed to go to the united states. the next thing they know that has been paused for now and they're told it's temporary.

it's a lot of confusion and uncertainty about when and how and if this is going to change. people understand this is an ongoing legal battle. you did see some people trying to take advantage of this temporary pause to try and get on planes to get to the united states. but we're not seeing this really large number of people or long cues of people trying to get on planes. perhaps that's understandable because they understand that this could change yet again really fast. people are weary of that. they've seen what happened last week to some of those travelers who were in the air when that executive order was imposed. people ended up either being deported, detained and their visa's revoked in some cases. there's that uncertainty where people don't really want to take that risk and lose those precious visas that they managed to get and end up with the cost of a trip to the u.s. of course, that humiliation of being turned back, so people

might be trying to avoid that and just waiting to see. and then there's also that cautious optimism right now that some people feel that maybe the american justice system is going to overturn a decision that so many people in this part of the world viewed as unjust and collective punishment. >> some of that, you talk about the humiliation. how much resentment is there across the middle east over this travel ban, over the steps the trump administration has taken? i mean, how does it hurt? is it just about optics, or do you think it will really hurt america's ability, the trump administration to do business, to do foreign policy in the region? >> reporter: well, i think there's a lot of concern. like seeing this ban coming into effect has really gone so many people in this part of the world concerned about what might happen next. some people believe that this is just the beginning. you talk about the feelings towards the united states when

world. of course, as we've heard from countries that are allies of the united states, like iraq for example, so many people there not officially the government, but people who say they are fighting terrorism on a daily basis that they are not a terror threat to the united states. they say they were insulted by this decision. >> you make an excellent point there. thanks so much. let's take a look at some other world news now. the father of the man accused of carrying out the machete attack at the louvre museum at paris is friday on speaking out. the egyptian born suspect was shot and wounded by a guard as he tried to attack a group of soldiers outside the building. his father insists that his son

is not a terrorist. >> he claims french authorities are engaging in a, quote, coverup for shooting his son who he says was on a business trip to paris. >> translator: he called me. he usually calls us from a foreign line which we answer. he told us he was in france for work. and that he would go home on saturday. so i asked him to buy me a cap like the ones french people wear in the winter. he called me again yesterday and i asked him did you buy me the cap? he asked me what color i would like. so i told him either black or gray. that's it. >> staying in france, the leader of the far right national front has unveiled a platform that she hopes will help her win the presidency in a few months time. the vote is in april. she's expected to make a major speech in a few hours. that's where paris correspondent melissa bell joins us. la pen has been the surging force in french politics for

quite a while now. what is she now presenting that is new? >> reporter: well, she has just unveiled her program for the election 144 points, 144 pledges of what she will do if she becomes the next president of france. it isn't so much what she's proposing has changed. it's rather from the context in which we understand what she's proposing has changed. when you look at her program it is things like the withdrawal from nato or retreat from national borders, referendum on france's belonging to the european union. a certain amount of economic protectionism, and what you find as you read through her program is that it sounds an awful lot like what donald trump stood on and is now beginning to introduce in the united states. in particular if you look further down the manifesto, .97

she believes national unity should be encouraged by sort of the creation of a national narrative and a refusal to apologize for historical mistakes that might go against that historical narrative. it is much more than economic and political changes and the return of national sovereign. it is rewriting of the way it allows -- it is very profound changes she's suggesting and rather what we've seen in the united states. were she to become the next president it would be much more than a change of government and much more like a change of regime. >> if you look at the presidential race in france, it's a very unsteady picture at the moment. how strong is the far right going into this campaign? >> reporter: it is the most extraordinary election to cover simply because everything does feel so up in the air. you have on the right the

republican candidate who has chosen november who had looked fairly unstoppable. his campaign seems to be collapsing under the weight of the allegations that surround his wife and his children who are allegedly paid for work that they didn't carry out to the tune of about a million euros. that's under investigation. there are growing fractures within his party many calling for replacement of the candidate. so you have the sense that anything can happen. the biggest question is what will happen in the second round. it's almost srcertain la pen wi get to that. can she get 50% of the vote? that has yet to be answered. >> thank you, appreciate your time. we'll take a short break and we'll be back. stay with us. hydro boost water gel. instantly quenches skin to keep it... ...supple and hydrated... ...day... ...after day. with hydrating hyaluronic acid, which retains up to 1000 times its weight...

...in water. this refreshing water gel... plumps skin cells with intense hydration and locks it in. for supple, hydrated skin that bounces back. hydro boost... from neutrogena®. see what's possible. if you have medicare

parts a and b and want more coverage, guess what? you could apply for a medicare supplement insurance plan whenever you want. no enrollment window. no waiting to apply. that means now may be a great time to shop for an aarp medicare supplement insurance plan, insured by unitedhealthcare insurance company. medicare doesn't cover everything. and like all standardized medicare supplement insurance plans, these help cover some of what medicare doesn't pay. so don't wait. call now to request your free decision guide. it could help you find the aarp medicare supplement plan that works for you. these types of plans have no networks, so you get to choose any doctor who accepts medicare patients.

rates are competitive, and they're the only plans of their kind endorsed by aarp. remember - these plans let you apply all year round. so call today. because now's the perfect time to learn more. go long. welcome back, everyone. we're following breaking news of the legal battle over donald trump travel ban on seven majority muslim countries and refugees. just denied a request to immediately restore the ban. >> that means for now the travel ba ban raemains suspended.

they must file legal briefs before it makes any additional decisions. this has already got people talking. saturday night live is back to mocking the trump administration. >> and this week's particular target was actress melissa mccar theo's impersonation of sean's spicer, the white house press secretary. >> settle down, settle down. settle down. before we begin, i know that myself and the press have gotten off to a rocky start. all right. all right. in the sense when i said rocky start, i mean it in the sense of rocky the movie because i came out here to punch you in the face and also i don't talk so good. i'll let you begin today by apologizing on behalf of you to me for how you have treated me

these last two weeks. and that apology is not accepted. because i'm not here to be your buddy. i'm here to swallow gum and i'm here to take names. >> too good. thanks so much for joining us. i'm robyn curnow. >> new day with victor blackwell and cristi paul is next. please stay with cnn. i wanted to know where i did my ancestrydna. the most shocking result was that i'm 26% native american. i had no idea. it's opened up a whole new world for me. ♪

tiki barber running hambone!a barber shop?t hut! yes!!! surprising. yes!!! what's not surprising? how much money david saved by switching to geico. fifteen minutes could save you fifteen percent or more. who's next? pain from a headache whecan make this...d, feel like this. all-in-one cold symptom relief from tylenol®, the #1 doctor recommended pain relief brand. tylenol® when you have a cold, pain from chest congestion can make this... feel like this. all-in-one cold symptom relief from tylenol®, the #1 doctor recommended pain relief brand. tylenol®

this is cnn break news. good morning. grateful to have your company. >> welcome to our viewers here in the u.s. and around the world. breaking news right off the top. president trump's travel ban is still blocked, at least for now. just a short time ago an appeals court denied the justice department's request to immediately restore the president's travel ban. >> both the washington attorney journal have been given deadlines to support their cases. on the phone with us to walk us through what this means. laura, help us understand