tv Anderson Cooper 360 CNN May 18, 2017 6:00pm-7:01pm PDT
6:00 pm
6:01 pm
on yet another day of breon breaking story after another, late reporting in the "the new york times" and a phone call two people briefed on it tell the "times" the president made to then-fbi director comey. it is in many ways the backstory to the video you're looking at right now. see director comey called over by the president from behind the bre drapes during a ceremony. we know according to "the new york times" director comey was trying to keep his distance from the president because of the ongoing russia investigation. his discomfort in this moment you're looking at right now would be justified when according to t"the new york times" the president called comey and asked him directly when federal authorities were going to put out word he personally was not under investigation. that's the latest item in a day that has seen many changes. jeff zeleny is at the white house with that and more. the video, the back story, are really fascinating. what else can you tell us about the nim noo"the new york times" from this evening? >> reporter: "the new york
6:02 pm
times" is reporting on the backstory between what the fbi director was thinking in the moment. this was based on his recollection, the very detailed basically journal he was keeping at the time, every time he had a meeting with the president. and michael schmidt at "the new york times" is reporting that the fbi director just had a sense of unease about this, and our pamela brown reported this yesterday that the fbi director was really, you know, leery of talking to the president. he said on more than one occasion that the president should reach out after the justice department, don't call him directly, but it's clear, anderson, that the president was, and perhaps, still is, obsessed about the notion of him being square in the middle of this russia investigation. of course, when he was firing the fbi director just last week, he said that i've been assured three times that he is not the target of the investigation. we're simply not sure if that's accurate yet. but going forward, it's just so clear that the president wanted his fbi director to be his man.
6:03 pm
it's clear the fbi director was his own man, anderson. >> today's been nonstop for the president. hours ago he held a news conference, he discussed russia for the first time since special counsel mueller has been named. gi give us some details. >> reporter: the president has been fuming ever since he was told last night that this special counsel was happening. again, he wasn't asked about it. he was told about it. and, you know, it's one of the sort of limits of the president's authority, but that carried over this morning, of course, he called it a witch hunt, but in his news conference this afternoon, he was fuming and seething but he was also clearly trying to restrain his words when he was talking about russia. let's watch. >> because believe me, there's no collusion. russia is fine. whether it's russia or anybody else, my total priority, believe me, is the united states of america. thank you very much. there was no collusion and everybody, even my enemies, have said, there is no collusion.
6:04 pm
>> reporter: so, again, the president once again there doing something he's done before, trying to exonerate himself saying even my enemies have said there's no collusion. anderson, that's what this investigation is all about. you'll hear democrats and republicans say there's no evidence of it necessarily, but that's what they are looking into. and the fbi director, himself, said before he was fired, that that's why this is a serious investigation. so every time the white house has tried to diminish this, the justice department has said, no, it's a serious investigation, and anderson, we're left at the end of all this, you know, four months after taking office almost exactly the president has now exactly what he didn't want at all. a special counsel looking into this russia investigation from the very beginning. will it find anything? we don't know if it will or not. important to point out, we do not know that. we do know this, it's hijacked his agenda, it's infuriated republicans and leaving him on uneven footing as he begins to step on to the world stage tomorrow, flying to saudi arabia for oa , four other places over eight
6:05 pm
days and she's agitated by this. so the mindset is tonight, anderson. >> is there any plan in the white house to try to get the president to stop continuing to talk about the special counsel and to maybe talk about his legislative agenda and to try to kind of use this as an opportunity to move forward? >> reporter: i think we could hear the beginnings, pivot of that at the news conference today, talking about jobs, how he wants to do things for america, for the voters who elected him but all of those efforts always seem to be a ground -- if you will, because he tweets something, like his tweet this morning. his staff was not expecting that calling it a witch hunt. they've taken a very measured approach to all of this, so it's his impulsive nature to comment on this, and anderson, i think that is the question going forward here. as this whole special investigation unfolds, will he have the discipline to not
6:06 pm
comment on it in realtime? on a newspaper story, on a, you know, on a news account. will he be able to help himself? his advisers hope he will. i think it's very much an open question. >> all right. jeff zeleny, thanks very much, at the white house. the man whose memo was depending on when you ask the president either central to or irrelevant to james comey's firing today briefed senators today. deputy attorney general rod rosenstein. sunlen serfaty has more on that. you're getting more details on the briefing from rosenstein. what can you tell us? >> reporter: that's right, anderson, many senators we spoke to leaving that briefing, that two-hour briefinged to really said there were specifically a lot of questions to rod rosenstein specifically about that memo that goes back to last tuesday that was written by rod rosenstein and released by the white house, held up then as their first justification for why fbi director james comey was fired. now according to democratic and republican senators coming down
6:07 pm
to that meeting today, they said that rosenstein today revealed an important detail about the timeline of all of this. he told senators, according to those in the room, that he knew one day before that president trump intended to fire and was going to fire james comey and importantly, this is the important detail here, that he wrote -- that that was one day before he even wrote that memo justifying the firing. of course, we know that the white house constantly and in the initial hours after the firing leaned on that memo as justification but very clear according to rosenstein, trump had already made up his decision before that memo. >> this coming the day after mueller's appointment as special counsel in the russia investigation. how are senators reacting today? >> reporter: certainly the initial widespread embrace of bob mueller as a special prosecutor continues. many people here today repeating that he's very well respected and he'll lead that investigation they believe with integrity, but certainly the
6:08 pm
work up here on capitol hill continues and many senators emphasizing, senators and members of the house, emphasizing that both sides on capitol hill will continue their investigation pushing forward on their own. there started to be some concern, though, some worry about how the logistics of all of this will work given the fact that there are so many investigations going on up here on capitol hill, and some concern that bob mueller's new special counsel, his appointment and his own investigation could potentially imperil their own investigation. one of those loudest critics was senator lindsey graham today. he said, look, we probably shouldn't be holding our breath anymore, basically, that james comey might be coming up here on capitol hill to testify. senator cornyn also saying that this is potentially a train wreck waiting to happen if they don't coordinate. >> all right. sunlen, thanks very much. now one of the senators who rod rosenste nstein briefed, blumen of connecticut, democratic member of the senate judiciary committee. he joins me now.
6:09 pm
you were in the briefing today. what can you say about how it went? >> there were a lot of questions unampbs unanswered. a lot of pieces missing. certainly the revelation that rod rosenstein knew about trump's plans before he wrote that memo was extremely important, but the main takeaway for me is the need for continuing vigilance and oversight over this investigation to the extent that its independence needs to be assured. bob mueller is a prosecutor's prosecutor. he has the guts and backbone to resist political pressure but at the same time he needs resources and our job is to make sure he gets those resources and his mandate is, in fact, unlimited as rod rosenstein has promised it would be, and we need to proceed on the judiciary committee, the intelligence committee, with investigations that will show what we can learn. the prosecutor will not produce a report with findings and recommendations. that's our job. >> you're sure that mueller will not produce a report at the end
6:10 pm
of this, if there's not illegali illegality, he does not undercover illegal actions by someone in the trump orbit, you think he won't actually produce a report that at least tells the american people what actually did happen? even if there was no illegality? >> he may produce a report. it would be unusual, and in fact, director comey's comments without producing criminal charges led to the criticism of him. >> right. >> because the prosecutor normally doesn't do it. so he would have to adopt the comey standard. >> which was widely criticized. >> which was widely criticized. the comey standard is as i asked him at the judiciary committee hearing, intense public interest, yes, this might qualify, but at the same tie men effect would have to make an exception to a longstanding rule. as a member of the justice department. >> if mueller does not find at the end of his investigation, however long it is, does not find criminality, does not find
6:11 pm
something illegal to prosecute, therefore the story of what actually happened, what contacts there were between the trump campaign and russia, doesn't get known from mueller's side, how -- would you be satisfied with that or do you believe the american people have to know even if there's no illegality whether -- what contacts there were, whether it was politically inappropriate, whether it was morally wrong? you know, there's a difference between something that's illegal and just something that is people would be upset by. >> i believe very strongly that there needs to be some public telling of the truth here. >> the truth has to come out. whether it's illegal or not, you wouldn't be satisfied if all that happened -- came out of this was mueller said, you know what, there's nothing to prosecute? >> as a u.s. senator and a public official and former prosecutor and a citizen, i want to know what the russians did to interfere with our election, what trump campaign's collusion was there and what obstruction of justice there may have been
6:12 pm
because there's mounting evidence of obstruction. no charges. no proof. but certainly evidence that needs to be pieced together. and here's the essential fact, that the prosecutor likely will not produce a report, but the american people deserve to know and that should be the job either of the intelligence committee or the judiciary committee or an independent commission which i have long advocated, an independent commission much like we've had in the wake of national disasters, similar threats to our security or democracy, and the cyber attack on our democracy is as one of my colleagues said an attack that should live in infamy. >> obviously there's huge curiosity about what director comey wrote in the notes. meeting with the president in the oval office where vice president pence was dismissed and jeff sessions was dismissed as well, the one-on-one conversation. also in the other notes or memos
6:13 pm
he wrote along the way detailing his interactions and reported discomfort. now that mueller is on the scene, they have a close relationship, is it likely comey will come testify in an open hearing in front of your committee or in front of the house committee and show those notes? >> that is an issue unyet resolved and it's a critical issue. >> seems like mueller could very well say, look, don't do that, let's reset here, let's look at -- let's make this part of the investigation. >> that would be an issue of timing, timing and tactics. on that issue and immunity for any witnesses, there are important such issues related to timing and tactics. eventually i believe jim comey wants to tell the story in public and will come before the committee. >> senator blumenthal, good to talk to you again. coming up , our panel's tak on all of this and the president's comment that nobody liked director comey.
6:14 pm
he said that again today. later, how history may not repeat itself but might just rhyme. watergate and could it be called russi russiagate? the parallels and differences ahead tonight. how if guests book direct ater, choicehotels.com and stay twice they'll get a $50 gift card? summertime. badda book. badda boom. got you a shirt! ...i kept the receipt... book now at choicehotels.com just turn on cars.coms on tprice dropswant? and get real-time notifications that could help save you money. use cars.com and save.
6:15 pm
find fast relief behind the counter allergies with nasal congestion? with claritin-d. [ upbeat music ] strut past that aisle for the allergy relief that starts working in as little as 30 minutes and contains the best oral decongestant. live claritin clear, with claritin-d. that the essence of integrity is a promise kept. ♪ if you've got the time welcome to the high life. ♪ we've got the beer ♪ miller beer
6:16 pm
if you have moderate to severe plaque psoriasis, isn't it time to let the real you shine through? introducing otezla, apremilast. otezla is not an injection or a cream. it's a pill that treats plaque psoriasis differently. some people who took otezla saw 75% clearer skin after 4 months. and otezla's prescribing information has no requirement for routine lab monitoring. don't take otezla if you are allergic to any of its ingredients. otezla may increase the risk of depression. tell your doctor if you have a history of depression or suicidal thoughts, or if these feelings develop. some people taking otezla reported weight loss. your doctor should monitor your weight and may stop treatment.
6:17 pm
side effects may include diarrhea, nausea, upper respiratory tract infection, and headache. tell your doctor about all the medicines you take, and if you're pregnant or planning to be. ask your dermatologist about otezla today. otezla. show more of you. when it comes to heartburn... trust the brand doctors trust. nexium 24hr is the #1 choice of doctors and pharmacists for their own frequent heartburn. for all day and all night protection... banish the burn... with nexium 24hr. in addition to reversing his explanation yet again for the firing of james comey, the president repeating his claim that director comey was somehow widely disliked. >> director comey was very unpopular with most people. >> well, as others have said on the program, afree or disagree with some of the director's decisions, he was, in fact, widely respected within the agency. listen to acting director andrew
6:18 pm
mccabe's testimony on the subject last week on capitol hill. >> i can tell you that i hold director comey in the absolute highest regard. i have the highest respect for his considerable abilities and his integrity and it has been the greatest privilege and honor of my professional life to work with him. i can tell you also that director comey enjoyed broad support within the fbi and still does to this day. >> so, there's that. there's "the new york times" reporting on director comey's extreme discomfort, attempts by the president, again, according to the "times" to buttonhole the director on russia. the most conspicuous human being in washington trying to blend in with the drapes. joining me gloria borger, jeffrey lord. why is the president talking b about director comey saying he was unpopular, the acting fbi director said the exact opposite last week.argument?
6:19 pm
>> what you're talking about is within the fbi, certainly i have heard from other fbi -- ex-fbi members who disagree, et cetera, but i'll cede the point. however, the president is quite correct that in the larger political community, i mean, as we got into this issue, and i began looking at all the democrats that said he should either resign or had no credibility or they needed to talk to him and they just, you know, they couldn't stand him, i mean, there's a lot of them out there, all on the record. so, in fact, he was not popular with members of congress on the democratic side of the aisle. >> van, last night we saw a pretty measured response from the white house on this special counsel probe. today the president tweeting about it calls it a witch hunt. that doesn't -- doesn't that actually resonate with his base? the notion that everyone is out to get him? i assume that's why either he just has no control over himself and just blurts these things out and he generally believes them or, you know, it's -- he blurts them out, believes them and he
6:20 pm
believes it helps stir up the base? >> however, what's interesting is a different donald trump. when he ran, he was this tough guy, this guy who's going to get things done, this great negotiator. he was trump zilla. he was going to make washington bow down. he was going to drain the swamp. now he's president snowflake, okay? everything he said, oh, they're mean to me and they don't like me and i just don't understand it and it's not fair. so you have a big brand shift going on. now, it still works with his base because his base says, listen, you know, this is our guy and now our guy's under fire. for most people he looks increasingly bizarre. people who didn't buy the product at least thought they knew what it was. it turns out you got -- you don't have trumpzilla, you have president snowflake. >> gloria, it's one thing when you're running if you're going to be the tough guy for the people, and, you know, for their needs to get jobs, to, you know, get security, whatever it may be, then it's another thing if
6:21 pm
you're the tough guy and you're talking about yourself all the time and how unfair everybody is to you. >> well, as you, you know, showed earlier in the show, you'yo you're at a commencement speech of young children graduating, and you're speaking about yourself. the president is petulant, i hate to say that, but it's true. these tweets are all about himself. they're not about letting justice be served, letting mueller go on with his work. and i have a question now. as cnn has been reporting, john king and jeff zeleny have been reporting, that they're going to hire an outside counsel for the president, which is a good thing. he ought to have one. and the question is whether anybody can save donald trump from himself and tell him to stop tweeting, to try and unite the country rather than divide the country, to compartmentalize which is something bill clinton did very well, go on with the
6:22 pm
business of governing, try to get that done, and let the legal issues take their own path and keep it out of the white house. >> jeff, i spoke to wolf blitzer earlier about an off-the-record meeting that sol journalists had with the president today and wolf was one of them. let's listen to what he said. >> he clearly was not happy about the appointment of a special counsel. and i'm looking at my notes. the president said he believes it hurts our country terribly. he says because it shows we're a divided mixed up not unified country. he says the country has very important things to be doing right now. he mentioned trade deals, military, other issues. i think it shows a very divided country, he said. and then he went one step further, anderson, he said, it also happens to be an excuse for the democrats why they lost the presidential election. he says they should have easily won because he says the electoral college was being slanted so much in favor of the democrats. so he was not happy.
6:23 pm
he's upset, but he's hoping that it will go forward and end quickly as you know earlier in the day he tweeted it was a witch hunt. >> i guess i just think -- it seems to me that this is an opportunity for him to reset things to put this, as gloria said, to compartmentalize it and just move forward on the agenda that he has. >> well, i do agree with that. i mean, this takes this off the board for the moment and he should just focus like a laser on his agenda. he's about to go abroad for, what, 11 days, whatever. this is a very, very significant trip. it's very important to him, very important to the country, it's very important to the world. he's going to focused on that. when we comes back, you know, health care and tax reform just laser in on it. the one thing i do want to say, anderson, in terms of that commencement speech, he also said something that i know has inspired people. he talks about this kind of thing all the time about thinking big and never, ever giving up. and that you got to be subjected to the critics and all that sort
6:24 pm
of thing. that is inspiring. that's inspired a lot of his audiences over time and it was a good thing to be saying to a commencement. >> jeff, sorry, van, i mean, the president went back also today to his original, or the original white house version of events surrounding comey's firing that it was rod rosenstein's letter on quocomey that played a role his decision. how do you square that with his comments last week to nbc that it was his decision he planned to fire comey even before hi e t rosenstein's letter? why would he be going back now to that today? >> anderson, trying to square comments by donald trump is like trying to square a golf ball. there's no squares there. it's all circular. so there's no way you can figure this stuff out except that he is impulsive and erratic and possibly dishonest. i think we got to pay attention to now is you got to watch the conservative movement as they try to process all this stuff. you have an ann coulter who was his biggest fan stepping away from him now saying she's disappointed.
6:25 pm
the same time you have a newt gingrich doubling down and saying it's going to have to be all-out war and what we think matters somewhat, but what's going on in the conservative movement right now? do they have any principles at all with regard to honesty, forthrightness, well-run organizations and institutions, or are they going to get pulled further and further away from their own principles? i think you're starting to see early signs. ann coulter was not crucified for criticizing donald trump. that was i think a significant development. if others start to move away, then he's got real trouble. >> van jones, jeff lord, gloria borger, thank you. just ahead, how house republicans reacted to rod rosenstein's appointment to a special counsel. i'll talk to congressman adam k kinzinger next. umbrellas!!
6:26 pm
6:27 pm
6:29 pm
but we've got the get tdigital tools to help. now with xfinity's my account, you can figure things out easily, so you won't even have to call us. change your wifi password to something you can actually remember, instantly. add that premium channel, and watch the show everyone's talking about, tonight. and the bill you need to pay? do it in seconds. because we should fit into your life, not the other way around. go to xfinity.com/myaccount deputy attorney general rod rosenstein plans to brief house lawmakers tomorrow about his appointment of mueller as special counsel. he briefed the senate today. many members of congress said they were caught off guard win t when the announcement was made yesterday afternoon.
6:30 pm
earlier i spoke to adam kinzingser who supports the decision. you're one of few republican congressmen in the house who's publicly supporting the special counsel. do you think more republicans are going to tfollow suit, if s, is that trouble for president trump? >> well, i think it's the right thing to do. i called for this yesterday morning. i said, look, this has gotten too partisan, basically any new piece of information people now put through their partisan stripes instead of what really happened. i think you're going to see more people follow in terms of saying, hey, this is the right thing to do, let's move forward. i don't know if it's going to be trouble for the president at all. i think we need all the facts out there. either the facts are going to say when it's all said and done, there was nothing here, or there may be something there and if there is, we deserve to know about it, but my main concern right now, anderson, is not so much 2018, 2020, it's the institution of government and people have lost so much faith in it that i think for a moment, we have to put aside our partisan politics to do that. to do right. >> it's possible, though, that
6:31 pm
the special counsel will find that there was nothing illegal that was done but certainly in the minds of a report. explaining what happened. >> yeah, that's possible. >> it becomes a political question, if there's a law issue, obviously then we get that and understand where to go forward depending what it is. no matter what happens out of this, 100% of americans are not going to be satisfied that all justice was done but i do think putting it through an independent counsel like this, you're going to have more americans that with whatever the end result is have more faith in the system than had it gone through congress. >> when the president said the appointment of a special counsel
6:32 pm
hurts our country terribly and labels it a witch hunt, is he just wrong? are those statements appropriate? >> i think he is wrong. i don't think it's a witch hunt. look, if the president thinks there's nothing to hide in this, this will exonerate him. and this will, look, president reagan had a special counsel appointed on him and he was a very successful president for eight years. the appointment of this does not indicate guilt. it's just, say, we have legitimate questions. what's great about our democracy, a lot of the times we get into this kind of trees in the forest and forget looking at the big forest. what's great about our democracy, we hold our leaders accountable. there's so many countries around the world that they can't do that. >> interesting you talk about celebrating them. the president has not said he'll fully comply with the investigations. what happens if he doesn't? do you anticipate the white house will? >> i think the white house will. in terms of what actually happens, i don't know, i don't know the actual legal part of that but i think they will. i think any look of obstruction
6:33 pm
or not giving everything to the independent counsel, and look, robert mueller seems like pretty much a bulldog. he can get the stuff he needs. you have obviously rosenstein that is very focused on doing the right thing by putting him in place. so it's going to take probably a month or so, maybe two months, to get this up and running, but there's a lot of information that mr. mueller can compile and look at, get more information. i think talking to general flynn is going to be a central, talking to paul manafort is going to be essential and put this all together and get an answer. we deserve it. we all do. >> i also want to ask you about what the "washington post" reported about what house majority leader mccarthy said in june of last year in a transcript. the conversation the "post" released kevin mccarthy said "there's two people i think putin pays, rohrabacher and trump. swear to god." ryan says "this is off the record, no leaks. all right?" went on to say "what's said in the family stays? the family."
6:34 pm
do you think he was on russia's payroll? >> we always tease dana rohrabacher out here, he's pro-russian in what he says, he'll admit it so we joke around with him about that. i know kevin mccarthy, i know his sense of humor. when i read that, i see a joke. i see him kind of chuckling trying to be funny. when you read it and you don't know his sense of humor, you can see where this comes from, but, look, i wasn't in this meeting but i can tell you, kevin mccarthy did not believe that donald trump was on putin's payroll. >> congressman, appreciate talking to you as always. thank you. >> any time, take care. just ahead, more than four decades later watergate is part of the national conversation yet again. the comparisons are flying. in the wake of james comey's firing, a special prosecutor, a reminder tonight how watergate began and how it ended plus i'll talk to former white house counsel john dean. it's a fortress. and with this standard of luxury... it's an oasis. the 2017 e-class.
6:35 pm
it's everything you need it to be... and more. lease the e300 for $569 a month at your local mercedes-benz dealer. mercedes-benz. the best or nothing. their leadership is instinctive. they're experts in things you haven't heard of. researchers of technologies that one day you will. some call them the best of the best. some call them veterans. we call them our team.
6:36 pm
blue moon is brewed with valencia orange peel, ♪ for a taste that shines brighter. new roundup for lawns has arrived to put unwelcome lawn weeds to rest. so draw the line. roundup for lawns is formulated to kill lawn weeds to the root without harming a single blade of grass. draw the line with roundup for lawns. without harming a single blade of grass. that when it comes to hospital romances,nows the more complicated, the better. i love you. but i love him. i love him, too. so do i. they also know you should get your annual check-up. schedule a checkup with your doctor to learn your four health numbers, and start taking control of your health today. it could save your life. cigna. together, all the way.
6:38 pm
in the nine days since fbi director james comey was fired a lot of people have been making watergate comparisons. it's way too early, of course, to know how all of this will unfold or if the comparison is at all valid. it's a safe bet that firing the man who's leading the investigation into your campaign's possible collusion with russia will stir up memories of archibald cox. won't make those memories disappear. with all the talk of watergate these days, we thought we should have randi kaye revisit how it actually played out. >> reporter: june 17th, 1972, at the watergate complex in washington, d.c.
6:39 pm
five men are arrested in the middle of the night for breaking into the democratic national committee headquarters. they are caught attempting to wiretap phones and steal documents. >> democratic officials today held a series of meetings to talk about tighter security. >> reporter: four months later, the "washington post" drops the bombshell that the watergate break-in was the work of aides to president richard nixon. bob woodward and carl bernstein broke the story for the "post." >> the break-in at the watergate headquarters was simply the tip of a huge iceberg that was a massive campaign of political espionage and sabotage directed from the nixon white house against president nixon's democratic opponents. >> reporter: president nixon later denies having any knowledge of the break-in. >> i first learned from news reports of the watergate break-in. >> reporter: but there's mounting evidence those close to him are involved. at the time, the "washington post" discovered the president's attorney general was controlling
6:40 pm
a secret republican fund used to finance intelligence-gathering operations against the democrats. still, november 1972, president nixon is re-elected in a landslide. a couple months later, two former nixon aides are convicted of conspiracy, burglary, and wiretapping. soon after, white house counsel john dean is fired. in may 1973, the senate watergate committee begins televised hearings. former white house counsel john dean testifies. >> the watergate matter was an inevitable outgrowth of a climate of excessive concern over the political impact of demonstrators, excessive concern over leaks, an insatiable appetite for political intelligence, all coupled with a do-it-yourself white house staff regardless of the law. >> dean's testimony was absolutely essential in establishing nixon's guilt. he was the essential inside
6:41 pm
witness against nixon. >> reporter: that same month, the president's former appointment secretary reveals this. >> are you aware of the installation of any listening devices in the oval office of the president? >> i was aware of listening devices, yes, sir. >> when were those devices placed in the oval office? >> approximately the summer of 1970. >> reporter: president nixon refuses to turn over the tapes of those recordings to the senate watergate committee and the special prosecutor, despite numerous requests. instead, he offers to provide summaries of the conversations which special prosecutor archibald cox rejects. then in october 1973, the saturday night massacre, president nixon has the special prosecutor fired and forces the resignation of two attorney generals who had refused to fire
6:42 pm
him. meanwhile, the investigation continued and so did the cover-up. it would later be discovered that nixon was insisting his aides find a way to pay off the watergate burglars using so-called hush money and continue to shield the white house through lies and false testimony. there was also the issue of a nearly 20-minute gap in one of the white house tapes that had been subpoenaed. >> how it was caused is still a mystery to me. >> reporter: the supreme court wasn't buying it. by july 1974, justices insisted president nixon hand over the recordings of his white house conversations, despite his claims of executive privilege. nixon delayed so the house of representatives voted to impeach him for obstruction of justice, abuse of power, and contempt of congress. nixon later handed over most of the tapes. >> that smoking gun was found in the tapes, and the court ordered that nixon turn over the tapes to the special prosecutor and those tapes established not only
6:43 pm
his guilt in the coverup, but also his participation and knowledge of some of the substantive events as part of the campaign of political espionage and sabotage. >> reporter: in august 1974, more than 2 years after the watergate break-in, richard nixon resigned. >> therefore, i shall resign the presidency effective at noon tomorrow. >> reporter: his vice president, gerald ford, was sworn in as president. weeks later, he pardoned richard nixon. the only president ever to resign office was never prosecuted for his crimes. randi kaye, cnn. >> cnn contributor john dean who you just heard from in randi's piece served 120 days in prison for his part of watergate. he joins me now. the president already calling this investigation a witch hunt, nothing proven yet. in your mind, are there echos of watergate here in your mind with this type of response by the
6:44 pm
president, the combativeness over there? >> there certainly are. anderson, every signal that trump has thrown starting with the campaign and right on through as president has been cover-up. they are not efforts to disclose, and it's so easy to make these things go away if you have nothing to hide. >> i want to get your response to something the president said today when asked about the russian investigation. i want to play that. >> there is no collusion between certainly myself and my campaign, but i can always speak for myself and the russians, zero. >> i wonder what you make of that. that could be interpreted he's leaving himself potential daylight between him and his staff when it comes to russia. is it a wise move, in your mind? >> well, it could be. nixon did not lie about small things but rather the big things and that's what caught him. it's hard to tell. mr. trump does not have a great record for truthfulness, as we've discovered, so i don't know if he's parsing or his
6:45 pm
denial is just not true, but if it were true, you think he could do more to absolve himself and get out of it. >> it does seem like he thinks he at times can talk his way out or convince people by talks but the more he talks he seems to dig himself in or don't tickcon things he's had his staff members say. i remember you talking about how nixon's staff was far more sort of compartmentalized. did nixon, did he have a lot of self-control? >> he did. a tremendous amount and he prepared heavily for every session that was in public or press conferences. >> so he wasn't winging it? >> he was not winging it. he was very careful and knew exactly what he was going to say before he said it. trump is just the opposite. he is winging it and that's gotten him in some trouble. you know, i think some of the things he's said, for example, in the lester holt interview, you know, these are going to come back and haunt him.
6:46 pm
no question. and if he has retained a lawyer, one of the things he's going to be told is stop talking about it. >> well, i mean, that's what -- you know, every lawyer we've had on the program over the last several days, alan dershowitz and others have said he's got to stop talking, whether he has counsel or not, he's not taken that message because he's out tweeting about things today and going back to the rod rosenstein explanation the white house put out the day comey was fired and the president reversed the next day to lester holt. >> anderson, one of the things about watergate people don't realize is nixon was not a master criminal. he made just like trump is doing one mistake after another mistake and just deepened his problems. he had several exits where he could have not gotten himself so deeply involved in the cover-up. he chose not to exercise any of them. even after he was warned of his troubles. and he doesn't get a really good lawyer, criminal lawyer, until
6:47 pm
after he resigns. that's too late. >> nixon didn't get a get criminal lawyer until after he resigned, really? >> that's right. >> wow. that's fascinating. john dean, thank you so much for being on. i really appreciate it. >> thank you. coming up, how the right-wing media is covering the mess the president's in pretty much boils down to one, it's a witch hunt, two, what about obama, three, oh, yeah, comey might have been drunk. we'll explain that ahead. yeah okay so. i can just quit school and get a job. it's ok. daddy's here. daddy. hey. hi. hey buddy hey dad i think we can do this. really?
6:48 pm
adam baily. adam baily. on mattress firmness? fortunately there's a bed where you both get what you want every night. enter sleep number and the semi-annual sale going on now. sleepiq technology tells you how well you slept and what adjustments you can make. she likes the bed soft. he's more hardcore. so your sleep goes from good to great to wow! only at a sleep number store. oh, and right now it's our lowest price ever on our temperature balancing i8 bed. save $700. go to sleepnumber.com for a store near you.
6:50 pm
heri think i might burst..... totally immersed weekenders. whatever kind of weekender you are, there's a hilton for you. book your weekend break direct with hilton.com and join the summer weekenders. just like the people every business is different. but every one of those businesses will need legal help as they age and grow. whether it be with customer contracts, agreements to lease a space or protecting your work. legalzoom's network of attorneys can help you, every step of the way. so you can focus on what you do and we'll handle the legal stuff that comes up along the way.
6:51 pm
legalzoom. legal help is here. president trump sngt -- isn't the only one calling the proceedings a witch hunt. >> reporter: downplay, deflect and deny. conservative media types are at it again, whipping up alternative theories to explain away the threat that james comey poses to president trump. the theories are all over the palace from "comey broke the law" -- >> it is illegal if james comey felt like the president was asking him to end an investigation and he thought it
6:52 pm
was obstruction of justice and he didn't report it immediately. >> reporter: to the press is reporting on the wrong president. >> if he's got to have them with trump, he's got to have the memos with meetings obama. hmm? >> reporter: and is comey under the influence? >> when did you write that, after three drinks, three cocktails? >> and some breitbart writers say others are the problem. >> what about benghazi or hillary clinton e-mail? >> another tactic, just downplay it, say the story's not a big deal. >> i would love to not have russia news in a while. >> it's like a witch hunt. >> on thursday trump tweeted it
6:53 pm
this is the single greatest witch hunt of a politician in american history. he was echoing these voices on fox. >> it's become a partisan witch hunt. >> trump's reelection campaign is raising money off the controversies, claiming sabotage and it's believable to some of his fans because of what they're being told in this echo chamber. >> there is a cultural war. they want to bully you into submission. >> brian joins me now. it's what you said, it's deny, deflect, downplay. >> it's all about providing a counternarrative. it's pro-trump media, provide a counternarrative to discuss with their friends. they feel more and more we're in these echo chambers, in these filter bubbles where people are sharing views that they agree
6:54 pm
with. >> they just ignored it on some nights. on some of the programs that chose on fox to report on it, their ratings went down. >> indeed. fox is in an unusual situation. the ratings are quite soft by normal standards. you used a smart word in the intro, customers. this is about providing customers what they want. that might not be the best thing in a democracy, as opposed to news consumers or more importantly voters, viewers. >> and roger ailes, whose death was announced today, created fox news and the blending of entertainment and journalism was something he pushed forward and made huge. >> absolutely. ailes changed america. you might say for the better or for the worst defending on whether you're a republican or a democrat.
6:55 pm
i was speaking with a fox source today that say ailes understood trump's base long before there was a president trump, he understood there was a disaffected portion of the country to program to and that's what fox continues to do. but partly because ailes has created fox, it's been joined by many other conservative media outlets that reinforce this counternarrative. >> coming up, remembering one of our colleagues, a mexican journalist who covered one of the drug cartels and appeared on this program has been assassinated. we remember javier valdez next. tomorrow -10am? staff meeting. 3:45? tai chi. 6:30? sam's baseball practice. you are busy. wouldn't it be great if you had investments that worked as hard as you do? yeah. introducing essential portfolios
6:57 pm
6:58 pm
6:59 pm
show me the top hot 100 artist. they give awards for being hot and 100 years old? we'll take 2! [ laughing ] xfinity x1 gives you exclusive access to the best of the billboard music awards just by using your voice. the billboard music awards. sunday, may 21st eight seven central only on abc. tragic news about a mexican journalist who reported on trafficking. javier valdez was killed, shot dead in mexico. he was the only person willing to go on camera to talk about the risk of covering drug cartels. he said the staff of the paper that he founded lived in feared but never backed down from
7:00 pm
coverage. speaking at the scene, the prosecutor promised his department would allow more protection for journalists. thanks very much for watching "360." time to hand it over to don lemon "cnn tonight" starts right now. >> breaking news because of course it's a defiant president doubling down on the eve of his crucial first foreign trip. this is "cnn tonight." i am don lemon. after an uncharacteristic silence from the commander in chief, he can hold out no longer and speaks out, first in the series of tweets calling the investigation a witch hunt, bad for the country, his word. his own alternative reality in the midst of a crisis of his on creation, all the while insisting he did not ask james comey to back off michael flynn but new details tonight in the "new york times," the president
119 Views
IN COLLECTIONS
CNN (San Francisco) Television Archive Television Archive News Search Service The Chin Grimes TV News ArchiveUploaded by TV Archive on