but we've got the get tdigital tools to help. now with xfinity's my account, you can figure things out easily, so you won't even have to call us. change your wifi password to something you can actually remember, instantly. add that premium channel, and watch the show everyone's talking about, tonight. and the bill you need to pay? do it in seconds. because we should fit into your life, not the other way around. go to xfinity.com/myaccount

breaking story after another, late reporting in the "the new york times" and a phone call two people briefed on it tell the "times" the president made to then-fbi director comey. it is in many ways the backstory to the video you're looking at right now. see director comey called over by the president from behind the drapes during a ceremony. this was back enjanuary. we know according to " this was back enjanuary. we know according to "the new york times" director comey was trying to keep his distance from the president because of the ongoing russia investigation. his discomfort in this moment you're looking at right now would be justified when according to "the new york times" the president called comey and asked him directly when federal authorities were going to put out word he personally was not under investigation. that's the latest item in a day that has seen many changes. jeff zeleny is at the white

house with that and more. the video, the back story, are really fascinating. what else can you tell us about "the new york times" reporting from this evening? >> reporter: "the new york times" is reporting on the backstory between what the fbi director was thinking in the moment. this was based on his recollection, the very detailed basically journal he was keeping at the time, every time he had a meeting with the president. and michael schmidt at "the new york times" is reporting that the fbi director just had a sense of unease about this, and our pamela brown reported this yesterday that the fbi director was really, you know, leery of talking to the president. he said on more than one occasion that the president should reach out after the justice department, don't call him directly, but it's clear, anderson, that the president was, and perhaps, still is, obsessed about the notion of him being square in the middle of this russia investigation. of course, when he was firing the fbi director just last week, he said that i've been assured

three times that he is not the target of the investigation. we're simply not sure if that's accurate yet. but going forward, it's just so clear that the president wanted his fbi director to be his man. it's clear the fbi director was his own man, anderson. >> today's been nonstop for the president. hours ago he held a news conference, he discussed russia for the first time since special counsel mueller has been named. give us some details. >> reporter: the president has been fuming ever since he was told last night that this special counsel was happening. again, he wasn't asked about it. he was told about it. and, you know, it's one of the sort of limits of the president's authority, but that carried over this morning, of course, he called it a witch hunt, but in his news conference this afternoon, he was fuming and seething but he was also clearly trying to restrain his words when he was talking about russia. let's watch. >> because believe me, there's no collusion. russia is fine. whether it's russia or anybody else, my total priority, believe

me, is the united states of america. thank you very much. there was no collusion and everybody, even my enemies, have said, there is no collusion. >> reporter: so, again, the president once again there doing something he's done before, trying to exonerate himself saying even my enemies have said there's no collusion. anderson, that's what this investigation is all about. you'll hear democrats and republicans say there's no evidence of it necessarily, but that's what they are looking into. and the fbi director, himself, said before he was fired, that that's why this is a serious investigation. so every time the white house has tried to diminish this, the justice department has said, no, it's a serious investigation, and anderson, we're left at the end of all this, you know, four months after taking office almost exactly the president has now exactly what he didn't want at all. a special counsel looking into this russia investigation from the very begning. will it find anything? weon't know if it will or not. important to point out, we do not know that. we do know this, it's hijacked his agenda, it's infuriated

republicans and leaving him on uneven footing as he begins to step on to the world stage tomorrow, flying to saudi arabia and four other places over eight days, and she's agitated by this. so the mindset is tonight, anderson. >> is there any plan in the white house to try to get the president to stop continuing to talk about the special counsel and to maybe talk about his legislative agenda and to try to kind of use this as an opportunity to move forward? >> reporter: i think we could hear the beginnings, pivot of that at the news conference today, talking about jobs, how he wants to do things for america, for the voters who elected him but all of those efforts always seem to be a ground back to ground zero, if you will. because he tweets something,

like this tweet this morning. his staff was not expecting that calling it a witch hunt. they've taken a very measured approach to all of this, so it's his impulsive nature to comment on this, and anderson, i think that is the question going forward here. as this whole special investigation unfolds, will he have the discipline to not comment on it in realtime? on a newspaper story, on a, you know, on a news account. will he be able to help himself? his advisers hope he will. i think it's very much an open question. >> all right. jeff zeleny, thanks very much, at the white house. the man whose memo was depending on when you ask the president either central to or irrelevant to james comey's firing today briefed senators today. deputy attorney general rod rosenstein. sunlen serfaty has more on that. you're getting more details on the briefing from rosenstein. what can you telus? >> reporter: that's right, anderson, many senators we spoke to leaving that briefing, that two-hour briefing today, really said there were specifically a lot of questions to rod rosenstein specifically about that memo that goes back to last

tuesday that was written by rod rosenstein and released by the white house, held up then as their first justification for why fbi director james comey was fired. now according to democratic and republican senators coming down to that meeting today, they said that rosenstein today revealed an important detail about the timeline of all of this. he told senators, according to those in the room, that he knew one day before that president trump intended to fire and was going to fire james comey and importantly, this is the important detail here, that he wrote -- that that was one day before he even wrote that memo justifying the firing. of course, we know that the white house constantly and in the initial hours after the firing leaned on that memo as justification but very clear according to rosenstein, trump had already made up his decision before that memo. >> this coming the day after mueller's appointment as special counsel in the russia investigation. how are senators reacting today? >> reporter: certainly the initial widespread embrace of bob mueller as a special prosecutor continues. many people here today repeating

that he's very well-respected and he'll lead that investigation they believe with integrity, but certainly the work up here on capitol hill continues and many senators emphasizing, senators and members of the house, emphasizing that both sides on capitol hill will continue their investigation pushing forward on their own. there started to be some concern, though, some worry about how the logistics of all of this will work given the fact that there are so many investigations going on up here on capitol hill, and some concern that bob mueller's new special counsel, his appointment and his own investigation could potentially imperil their own investigation. one of those loudest critics was senator lindsey graham today. he said, look, we probably shouldn't be holding our breath anymore, basically, that james comey might be coming up here on capitol hill to testify. senator cornyn also saying that this is potentially a train wreck waiting to happen if they don't coordinate. >> all right. sunlen, thanks very much. now one of the senators who rod

rosenstein briefed, blumenthal of connecticut, democratic member of the senate judiciary committee. he joins me now. you were in the briefing today. what can you say about how it went? >> there were a lot of questions unanswered. a lot of pieces missing. certainly the revelation that rod rosenstein knew about trump's plans before he wrote that memo was extremely important, but the main takeaway for me is the need for continuing vigilance and oversight over this investigation to the extent that its independence needs to be assured. bob mueller is a prosecutor's prosecutor. he has the guts and backbone to resist political pressure but at the same time he needs resources and our job is to make sure he gets those resources and his mandate is, in fact, unlimited as rod rosenstein has promised it would be, and we need to proceed on the judiciary committee, the intelligence committee, with investigations that will show what we can

learn. the prosecutor will not produce a report with findings and recommendations. that's our job. >> you're sure that mueller will not produce a report at the end of this, if there's not illegality, he does not undercover illegal actions by someone in the trump orbit, you think he won't actually produce a report that at least tells the american people what actually did happen? even if there was no illegality? >> he may produce a report. it would be unusual, and in fact, director comey's comments without producing criminal charges led to the criticism of him. >> right. >> because the prosecutor normally doesn't do it. so he would have to adopt the comey standard. >> which was widely criticized. >> which was widely criticized. the comey standard is as i asked him at the judiciary committee hearing, intense public interest, yes, this might qualify, but at the same time in effect would have to make an exception to a longstanding rule as that he has followed as

a prosecutor. as a member of the justice department. >> if mueller does not find at the end of his investigation, however long it is, does not find criminality, does not find something illegal to prosecute, therefore the story of what actually happened, what contacts there were between the trump campaign and russia, doesn't get known from mueller's side, how -- would you be satisfied with that or do you believe the american people have to know even if there's no illegality whether -- what contacts there were, whether it was politically inappropriate, whether it was morally wrong? you know, there's a difference between something that's illegal and just something that is people would be upset by. >> i believe very strongly that telling ofhe truth here.ublic >> the truth has to come out. whether it's illegal or not, you wouldn't be satisfied if all that happened -- came out of this was mueller said, you know what, there's nothing to prosecute? >> as a u.s. senator and a public official and former prosecutor and a citizen, i want to know what the russians did to

interfere with our election, what trump campaign's collusion was there and what obstruction of justice there may have been because there's mounting evidence of obstruction. no charges. no proof. but certainly evidence that needs to be pieced together. and here's the essential fact, that the prosecutor likely will not produce a report, but the american people deserve to know and that should be the job either of the intelligence committee or the judiciary committee or an independent commission which i have long advocated, an independent commission much like we've had in the wake of national disasters, similar threats to our security or democracy, and the cyber attack on our democracy is as one of my colleagues said, an attack that should live in infamy. >> obviously there's huge curiosity about what director comey wrote in the notes. meeting with the president in the oval office where vice

president pence was dismissed and jeff sessions was dismissed as well, the one-on-one conversation. also in the other notes or memos he wrote along the way detailing his interactions and reported discomfort. now that mueller is on the scene, they have a close relationship, is it likely comey will come testify in an open hearing either in front of your house committee and show those notes? >> that is an issue unyet resolved and it's a critical issue. >> seems like mueller could very well say, look, don't do that, let's reset here, let's look at -- let's make this part of the investigation. >> that would be an issue of timing, timing and tactics. on that issue and immunity for any witnesses, there are important such issues related to timing and tactics. eventually i believe jim comey wants to tell the story in public and will come before the committee. >> senator blumenthal, good to talk to you again. coming up, our panel's take

on all of this and the president's comment that nobody liked director comey. he said that again today. keeping him honest on that. later, how history may not repeat itself but might just rhyme. watergate and could it be called russiagate? the parallels and differences ahead tonight. ♪ whether you're after supreme performance... advanced intelligence... or breathtaking style... there's a c-class just for you. decisions, decisions, decisions. lease the c300 sedan for $399 a month at your local mercedes-benz dealer. mercedes-benz. the best or nothing. what in real time?stomer insights from the data wait, our data center and our clouds can't connect? michael, can we get this data to...? look at me...look at me... look at me... you used to be the "yes" guy. what happened to that guy?

legacy technology can handcuff any company. but "yes" is here. so, you're saying we can cut delivery time? yeah. with help from hpe, we can finally work the way we want to. with the right mix of hybrid it, everything computes. what's going on? oh hey! ♪ that's it? yeah. ♪ everybody two seconds! ♪ "dear sebastian, after careful consideration of your applicaon, it is with gat pleasure that we offer our congratulations on your acceptance..." through the tuition assistance program, every day mcdonald's helps more people go to college. it's part of our commitment to being america's best first job. ♪

your only worry...ty customer first guarantee... will be that one... rogue... cloud. get help with hotels, free twenty-four-hour flight changes, and our price match guarantee. travelocity.® wander wisely.™ radio: scorching heat today folks[ barks ]ol out there! walter! stop suffering with hot ac.

co it yourself with a/c pro. just connect the hose, squeeze the trigger and check the gauge. with 2 times the cooling boosters enjoy the comfort of the #1 selling coldest air. nothing cools like a/c pro. in addition to reversing his explanation yet again for the firing of james comey, the president repeating his claim that director comey was somehow widely disliked. >> director comey was very unpopular with most people. >> well, as others have said on the program, agree or disagree with some of the director's decisions, he was, in fact, widely respected within the agency. listen to acting director andrew mccabe's testimony on the subject last week on capitol hill. >> i can tell you that i hold director comey in the absolute highest regard. i have the highest respect for his considerable abilities and his integrity, and it has been the greatest priv hj and honor of my professional life to work

with him. i can tell you also that director comey enjoyed broad support within the fbi and still does to this day. >> so, there's that. there's "the new york times'" reporting on director comey's extreme discomfort, attempts by the president, again, according to the "times" to buttonhole the director on russia. the most conspicuous human being in washington trying to blend in with the drapes. joining me, gloria borger, van joans, and jeffrey lord. why is the president talking about director comey saying he was unpopular, the acting fbi director said the exact opposite last week. does it serve his argument? >> anderson, there's two different situations there. what you're talking about is within the fbi, certainly i have heard from other fbi -- ex-fbi members who disagree, et cetera, but i'll cede the point. however, the president is quite correct that in the larger political community, i mean, as we got into this issue, and i began looking at all the democrats that said he should either resign or had no

credibility or they needed to talk to him and they just, you know, they couldn't stand him, i mean, there's a lot of them out there, all on the record. so, in fact, he was not popular with members of congress on the democratic side of the aisle. >> van, last night we saw a pretty measured response from the white house on this special counsel probe. today the president tweeting about it calls it a witch hunt. that doesn't -- doesn't that actually resonate with his base? the notion that everyone is out to get him? i assume that's why either he just has no control over himself and just blurts these things out and he generally believes them or, you know, it's -- he blurts them out, believes them and he believes it helps stir up the base? >> i think he is correct in that. however, what's interesting is a different donald trump. when he ran, he was this tough guy, this guy who's going to get things done, this great negotiator. he was trumpzilla. he was going to make washington bow down.

he was going to drain the swamp. now he's president snowflake, okay? everything he said, oh, they're mean to me and they don't like me and i just don't understand it and it's not fair. so you have a big brand shift going on. now, it still works with his base because his base says, listen, you know, this is our guy and now our guy's under fire. for most people he looks increasingly bizarre. people who didn't buy the product at least thought they knew what it was. it turns out you got -- you don't have trumpzilla, you have president snowflake. >> gloria, it's one thing when you're running if you're going to be the tough guy for the people, and, you know, for their needs to get jobs, to, you know, get security, whatever it may be, then it's another thing if you're the tough guy and you're talking about yourself all the time and how unfair everybody is to you. >> well, as you, you know, showed earlier in the show, you're at a commencement speech about young students graduating and you're talking about yourself. the president is petulant, i hate to say that, but it's true. these tweets are all about

himself. they're not about letting justice be served, letting mueller go on with his work. and i have a question now. as cnn has been reporting, john king and jeff zeleny have been reporting, that they're going to hire an outside counsel for the president, which is a good thing. he ought to have one. and the question is whether anybody can save donald trump from himself and tell him to stop tweeting, to try and unite the country rather than divide the country, to compartmentalize which is something bill clinton did very well, go on with the business of governing, try to get that done, and let the legal issues take their own path and keep it out of the white house. >> jeff, ipoke to wolf blitzer earlier about an off-the-record meeting that some journalists had with the president today and wolf was one of them. let's listen to what he said. >> he clearly was not happy about the appointment of a

special counsel. and i'm looking at my notes. the president said he believes it hurts our country terribly. he says because it shows we're a divided mixed up not unified country. he says the country has very important things to be doing right now. he mentioned trade deals, military, other issues. i think it shows a very divided country, he said. and then he went one step further, anderson, he said, it also happens to be an excuse for the democrats why they lost the presidential election. he says they should have easily won because he says the electoral college was being slanted so much in favor of the democrats. so he was not happy. he's upset, but he's hoping that it will go forward and end quickly as you know earlier in the day he tweeted it was a witch hunt. >> i guess i just think -- it seems to me that this is an opportunity for him to reset things to put this, as gloria said, to compartmentalize it and just move forward on the agenda that he has. >> well, i do agree with that.

i mean, this takes this off the board for the moment and he should just focus like a laser on his agenda. he's about to go abroad for, what11 days, whatever. this is a very, very significant trip. it's very important to him, very important to the country, it's very important to the world. he's going to focused on that. when we comes back, you know, health care and tax reform just laser in on it. the one thing i do want to say, anderson, in terms of that commencement speech, he also said something that i know has inspired people. he talks about this kind of thing all the time about thinking big and never, ever giving up. and that you got to be subjected to the critics and all that sort of thing. that is inspiring. that's inspired a lot of his audiences over time and it was a good thing to be saying to a commencement. >> jeff, sorry, van, i mean, the president went back also today to his original, or the original white house version of events surrounding comey's firing that it was rod rosenstein's letter on comey that played a role in his decision. how do you square that with his comments last week to nbc that it was his decision he planned

to fire comey even before he got rosenstein's letter? why would he be going back now to that today? >> anderson, trying to square comments by donald trump is like trying to square a golf ball. there's no squares there. it's all circular. so there's no way you can figure this stuff out except that he is impulsive and erratic and possibly dishonest. i think we got to pay attention to now is you got to watch the conservative movement as they try to process all this stuff. you have an ann coulter who was his biggest fan stepping away from him now saying she's disappointed. the same time you have a newt gingrich doubling down and saying it's going to have to be all-out war and what we think matters somewhat, but what's going on in the conservative movement right now? do they have any principles at all with regard to honesty, forthrightness, well-run organizations and institutions, or are they going to get pulled

further and further away from their own principles? i think you're starting to see early signs. ann coulter was not crucified for criticizing donald trump. that was i think a significant development. if others stt to move away, then he's got real trouble. right now they're still holding him. >> van jones, jeff lord, gloria borger, thank you. just ahead, how house republicans reacted to rod rosenstein's appointment to a special counsel. i'll talk to congressman adam kinzinger next. ♪ experience the first-ever 471-horsepower lexus lc 500 or the multistage hybrid lc 500h. experience amazing. gave us the power to turn this enemy into an ally? microsoft and its partners are using smart traps to capture mosquitoes and sequence their dna to fight disease. there are over 100 million pieces of dna in every sample. with the microsoft cloud, we can analyze the data

faster than ever before. if we can detect new viruses before they spread, we may someday prevent outbreaks before they begin. it'sand your doctor at yoto maintain your health.a because in 5 days, 10 hours and 2 minutes you are going to be 67. and on that day you will walk into a room where 15 people will be waiting... 12 behind the sofa, 2 behind the table and 1 and a half behind a curtain. family: surprise! but only one of them will make a life long dream come true. great things are ahead of you when your health is ready for them. at humana, we can help you with a personalized plan for your health for years to come. start your day with the number one choice of dentists. philips sonicare removes significantly mo plaqu versus oral-b 7000. experience this amazing feel of clean. innovation and you. philips sonicare. save now when you buy philips sonicare.

deputy attorney general rod rosenstein plans to brief house lawmakers tomorrow about his appointment of robert mueller as special counsel. as we said, he briefed the senate today. many members of congress said they were caught off guard when the announcement was made yesterday afternoon. earlier i spoke to adam kinzinger who supports the decision. you're one of few republican congressmen in the house who's publicly supporting the special counsel. do you think more republicans are going to follow suit, if so, is that trouble for president trump? >> well, i think it's the right thing to do. i called for this yesterday morning. i said, look, this has gotten too partisan, basically any new put through their partisan now

stripes instead of what really happened. i think you're going to see more people follow in terms of saying, hey, this is the right thing to do, let's move forward. i don't know if it's going to be trouble for the president at all. i think we need all the facts out there. either the facts are going to say when it's all said and done, there was nothing here, or there may be something there and if there is, we deserve to know about it, but my main concern right now, anderson, is not so much 2018, 2020, it's the institution of government and people have lost so much faith in it that i think for a moment, we have to put aside our partisan politics to do that. to do right. >> it's possible, though, that the special counsel will find that there was nothing illegal that was done but certainly in the minds of some voters, something wrong was done morally or just inappropriate. and it's possible the special

counsel would not even make a report. explaining what happened. >> yeah, that's possible. it becomes a political question. if there's a law issue, obviously, then we get that and understand where to go no matter what happens out of this, 100% of americans are not going to be satisfied that all stice was done but i do think putting it through an independent counsel like this, you're going to have more americans that with whatever the end result is have more faith in the system than had it gone through congress. >> when the president said the appointment of a special counsel hurts our country terribly and labels it a witch hunt, is he just wrong? are those statements appropriate? >> i think he is wrong. i don't think it's a witch hunt. look, if the president thinks there's nothing to hide in this, this will exonerate him. and this will, look, president reagan had a special counsel appointed on him and he was a very successful president for eight years.

the appointment of this does not indicate guilt. it's just, say, we have legitimate questions. what's great about our democracy, a lot of the times we get into this kind of trees in the forest and forget looking at the big forest. what's great about our democracy is we old our leaders accountable. there's so many countries around the world that they can't do that. >> interesting you talk about celebrating them. the president has not said he'll fully comply with the investigations. what happens if he doesn't? do you anticipate the white house will? >> i think the white house will. in terms of what actually happens, i don't know, i don't know the actual legal part of that but i think they will. i think any look of obstruction or not giving everything to the independent counsel, and look, robert mueller seems like pretty much a bulldog. he can get the stuff he needs. you have obviously rosenstein that is very focused on doing the right thing by putting him in place. so it's going to take probably a month or so, maybe two months, to get this up and running, but there's a lot of information that mr. mueller can compile and look at, get more information.

i think talking to general flynn is going to be essential, talking to paul manafort is going to be essential and put this all together and get an answer. we deserve it. we all do. >> i also want to ask you about what the "washington post" reported about what house majority leader mccarthy said in june of last year in a transcript. the conversation the "post" released kevin mccarthy said "there's two pple i think putin pays, rohrabacher and trump. swear to god." ryan says "this is off the record, no leaks. all right?" went on to say "what's said in the family stays? the family." do you think he was on russia's payroll? >> i don't think so. look, we always kind of tease da dana rohrabacher out here, he's pro-russian in what he says, he'll admit it so we joke around with him about that. i know kevin mccarthy, i know

his sense of humor. when i read that, i see a joke. i see him kind of chuckling trying to be funny. when you read it and you don't know his sense of humor, you can see where this comes from, but, look, i wasn't in this meeting but i can tell you, kevin mccarthy did not believe that donald trump was on putin's payroll. >> congressman, appreciate talking to you as always. thank you. >> any time, take care. just ahead, more than four decades later watergate is part of the national conversation yet again. the comparisons are flying. in the wake of james comey's firing, a special prosecutor, a reminder tonight how watergate began and how it ended plus i'll talk to former white house counsel john dean. estimony will. mr. stevens? this is your new name. this is your new house. and a perfectly inconspicuous suv. you must become invisible. [hero] i'll take my chances. so you miss the big city? i don't miss much...

definitely not the traffic. excuse me, doctor... the genomic data came in. thank you. you can do tha kind of analysis? yeah, watson. i can quickly analyze millions of clinical and scientific reports to help you tailor treatment options for the patient's genomic profile. you can do that? even way out here? yes. even way out here. there are the wildcats 'til we die weekenders. the watch me let if fly. this i gotta try weekenders. then we've got the bendy... ... spendy weekenders. the tranquility awaits. hanging with our mates weekenders and the it's been quite a day... ...so glad we got away weekenders. whatever kind of weekender you are, there's a hilton for you. book your weekend break direct at hilton.com and join the weekenders.

radio: scorching heat today folks[ barks ]ol out there! walter! stop suffering with hot ac. cool it yourself with a/c pro. just connect the hose, squeeze the trigger and check the gauge. with 2 times the cooling boosters enjoy the comfort of the #1 selling coldest air. nothing cools like a/c pro.

the shlike a bald penguin. how do i look? [ laughing ] show me the billboard music awards. show me top artist. show me the top hot 100 artist. they give awards for being hot and 100 years old? we'll take 2! [ laughing ] xfinity x1 gives you exclusive access to the best

of the billboard music awards just by using your voice. the billboard music awards. sunday, may 21st eight seven central only on abc. in the nine days since fbi director james comey was fired a lot of people have been making watergate comparisons. it's way too early, of course, to know how all of this will unfold or if the comparison is at all valid. it's a safe bet that firing the man who's leading the investigation into your campaign's possible collusion with russia will stir up memories of archibald cox. in tweeting you may have tapes of the fbi director you just fired won't make those memories disappear. with all the talk of watergate these days, we thought we should have randi kaye revisit how it actually played out. >> reporter: june 17th, 1972, at the watergate complex in washington, d.c. five men are arrested in the middle of the night for breaking into the democratic national committee headquarters. they are caught attempting to

wiretap phones and steal documents. >> democratic officials today held a series of meetings to talk about tighter security. >> reporter: four months later, the "washington post" drops the bombshell that the watergate break-in was the work of aides to president richard nixon. bob woodward and carl bernstein broke the story for the "post." >> the break-in at the watergate headquarters was simply the tip of a huge iceberg that was a massive campaign of political espionage and sabotage directed from the nixon white house against president nixon's democratic opponents. >> reporter: president nixon later denies having any knowledge of the break-in. >> i first learned from news reports of the watergate break-in. >> reporter: but there's mounting evidence those close to him are involved. at the time, the "washington post" discovered the president's attorney general was controlling a secret republican fund used to finance intelligence-gathering operations against the democrats.

still, november 1972, president nixon is re-elected in a landslide. a couple months later, two former nixon aides are convicted of conspiracy, burglary, and wiretapping. soon after, white house counsel john dean is fired. in may 1973, the senate watergate committee begins televised hearings. former white house counsel john dean testifies. >> the watergate matter was an inevitable outgrowth of a climate of excessive concern over the political impact of demonstrators, excessive concern over leaks, an insatiable appetite for political intelligence, all coupled with a do-it-yourself white house staff regardless of the law. >> dean's testimony was absolutely essential in establishing nixon's guilt. he was the essential inside witness against nixon. >> reporter: that same month, the president's former appointment secretary reveals this.

>> are you aware of the installation of any listening devices in the oval office of the president? >> i was aware of listening devices, yes, sir. >> when were those devices placed in the oval office? >> approximately the summer of 1970. >> reporter: president nixon refuses to turn over the tapes of those recordings to the senate watergate committee and the special prosecutor, despite numerous requests. instead, he offers to provide summaries of the conversations which special prosecutor archibald cox rejects. then in october 1973, the saturday night massacre, president nixon has the special prosecutor fired and forces the resignation of two attorney generals who had refused to fire him. meanwhile, the investigation continued and so did the cover-up. it would later be discovered that nixon was insisting his

aides find a way to pay off the watergate burglars using so-called hush money and continue to shield the white house through lies and false testimony. there was also the issue of a nearly 20-minute gap in one of the white house tapes that had been subpoenaed. >> how it was caused is still a mystery to me. >> reporter: the supreme court wasn't buying it. by july 1974, justices insisted president nixon hand over the recordings of his white house conversations, despite his claims of executive privilege. nixon delayed so the house of representatives voted to impeach him for obstruction of justice, abuse of power, and contempt of congress. nixon later handed over most of the tapes. >> that smoking gun was found in the tapes, and the court ordered that nixon turn over the tapes to the special prosecutor and those tapes established not only his guilt in the cover-up, but also his participation and

knowledge of some of the substantive events as part of the campaign of political espionage and sabotage. >> reporter: in august 1974, more than 2 years after the watergate break-in, richard nixon resigned. >> therefore, i shall resign the presidency effective at noon tomorrow. >> reporter: his vice present, gerald ford, was sworn in as president. weeks later, he pardoned richard nixon. the only president ever to resign office was never prosecuted for his crimes. randi kaye, cnn. >> cnn contributor john dean who you just heard from in randi's piece served 120 days in prison for his part of watergate. he joins me now. so, john, the president already calling this investigation a witch-hunt. nothing proven yet, but in your mind are there echoes of watergate here in your mind with this type of response by the

president, the combativeness over there? >> there certainly are. anderson, every signal that trump has thrown starting with the campaign and right on through as president has been cover-up. they are not efforts to disclose, and it's so easy to make these things go away if you have nothing to hide. >> i want to get your response to something the president said today when asked about the russian investigation. i want to play that. >> there is no collusion between certainly myself and my campaign, but i can always speak for myself and the russians, zero. >> i wonder what you make of that. that could be interpreted he's leaving himself potential daylight between him and his staff when it comes to russia. is it a wise move, in your mind? >> well, it could be. nixon did not lie about small things but rather the big things and that's what caught him. it's hard to tell. mr. trump does not have a great record for truthfulness, as we've discovered, so i don't know if he's parsing or his denial is just not true, but if it were true, you think he could

do more to absolve himself and get out of it. >> it does seem like he thinks he at times can talk his way out or convince people by talks but the more he talks he seems to dig himself in or contradict things he's had his staff members say. did nixon have that issue -- or i remember you talk about how nixon's staff was far more sort of compartmentalized. did nixon, did he have a lot of self-control? >> he did. a tremendous amount and he prepared heavily for every session that was in public or press conferences. >> so he wasn't winging it? >> he was not winging it. he was very careful and knew exactly what he was going to say before he said it. trump is just the opposite. he is winging it and that's gotten him in some trouble. you know, i think some of the things he's said, for example, in the lester holt interview, you know, these are going to come back and haunt him. no question. and if he has retained a lawyer, one of the things he's going to be told is stop talking about it.

>> well, i mean, that's what -- you know, every lawyer we've had on the program over the last several days, alan dershowitz and others have said he's got to stop talking, whether he has counsel or not, he's not taken that message because he's out tweeting about things today and going back to the rod rosenstein explanation the white house put out the day comey was fired and the president reversed the next day to lester holt. >> anderson, one of the things about watergate people don't realize is nixon was not a master criminal. he made just like trump is doing one mistake after another mistake and just deepened his problems. he had several exits where he could have not gotten himself so deeply involved in the cover-up. he chose not to exercise any of them. even after he was warned of his troubles. and he doesn't get a really good lawyer, criminal lawyer, until after he resigns. that's too late. >> nixon didn't get a get criminal lawyer until after he

resigned, really? >> that's right. >> wow. that's fascinating. john dean, thank you so much for being on. i really appreciate it. >> thank you. coming up, how the right-wing media is covering the mess the president's in pretty much boils down to one, it's a witch hunt, two, what about obama, three, oh, yeah, comey might have been drunk. we'll explain that ahead. dear predictable, there's no other way to say this. it's over. i've found a permanent escape from monotony. together, we are perfectly balanced, our senses awake, our hearts racing as one. i know this is sudden, but they say: if you love something... set it free. see you around, giulia ♪

this is a story about mail and packages. and it's also a story about people. people who rely on us every day to deliver their dreams. they're handing us more than mail. they're handing us their business. and while we make more e-commerce deliveries to homes than anyone else in the country we never forget... that your business is our business. the united states postal service. priority: you ♪ your only worry...ty customer first guarantee... will be choosing which filter to use. get help with hotels, free twenty-four-hour flight changes,

and our price match guarantee. travelocity.® wander wisely.™ whenand now with victoza®etes, there's a moment of truth. a better moment of proof. victoza lowers my a1c and blood sugar better than the leading branded pill, which didn't get me to my goal. victoza® works with your body to lower blood sugar in three ways: in the stomach, the liver, and the pancreas. and while it isn't for weight loss, victoza® may help you lose some weight. non-insulin victoza® comes in a pen and is taken once a day. (announcer) victoza® is not recommended as the first medication to treat diabetes and is not for people with type 1 diabetes

or diabetic ketoacidosis. do not take victoza® if you have a personal or family history of medullary thyroid cancer, multiple endocrine neoplasia syndrome type 2, or if you are allergic to victoza® or any of its ingredients. stop taking victoza® and call your doctor right away if you get a lump or swelling in your neck or if you develop any allergic symptoms including itching, rash, or difficulty breathing. serious side effects may happen, including pancreatitis. so, stop taking victoza® and call your doctor right away if you have severe pain in your stomach area. tell your doctor your medical history. taking victoza® with a sulfonylurea or insulin may cause low blood sugar. the most common side effects are headache, nausea, diarrhea and vomiting. side effects can lead to dehydration, which may cause kidney problems. now's the time for a better moment of proof. ask your doctor about victoza®. allergytry new xyzal®.ou have symptoms like these for relief is as effective at hour 24 as hour one.

so be wise all take new xyzal®. president trump isn't the only one calling the russian investigation a witchhunt. you turn on the president's favorite tv program, you would think it was in salem, massachusetts. and the media has adopted a strategy to convince its customers, including the president, that there's no there there. >> reporter: downplay, deflect and deny. conservative media types are at it again, whipping up alternative theories to explain away the threat that james comey poses to president trump. the theories are all over the palace from "comey broke the law" -- >> it is illegal if james comey felt like the president was asking him to end an investigation and he thought it was obstruction of justice and he didn't report it immediately. >> reporter: to the press is

focusing on the wrong president. >> if comey has memos in his meetings with trump, he's got to have mos from his meetings with obama. hmm? >> reporter: and is comey under the influence? >> when did you write that, after three drinks, three cocktails? >> reporter: and some breitbart writers say the deep state of prurts is to game for trump's troubles. when denials don't suffice, right wing talkers deflect. >> what about benghazi or hillary clinton e-mail? >> reporter: another tactic, just downplay it. say the story's not a big deal. >> i would love to not have russia is the news for a while. >> reporter: sometimes you see the feedback wheel between these

commentators and the commander in chief. >> it's like a witchhunt. >> reporter: on thursday, trump tweeted it was the single-greatest witchhunt of a politician in american history. he was echoing these voices on fox. >> it's become a partisan witch hunt. >> trump's reelection campaign is raising money off the controversies, claiming sabotage and it's believable to some of his fans because of what they're being told in this echo chamber. >> there is a cultural war. they want to bully you into submission. >> brian joins me now. as you say, it's deny, deflect, downplay. that's what the coverage is these days. >> it's all about providing a counternarrative. the trump white house helps do this. it's pro-trump media, provide a counternarrative to discuss with their friends. they feel more and more we're in these echo chambers, in these filter bubbles where people are sharing views that they agree with. not everybody, but many people. and that week's coverage of what is decidedly an awful week for the president, shows that once

again. >> they just ignored it on some nights. on some of the programs that chose on fox to report on it, their ratings went down. >> indeed. fox is in an unusual situation. the ratings are quite soft by fox standards. fox's audience doesn't want to hear these words. you used a smart word in the intro, customers. this is about providing customers what they want. that might not be the best thing in a democracy, as opposed to news consumers or more importantly voters, viewers. >> and roger ailes, whose death was announced today, created fox news and the blending of entertainment and journalism was something he pushed forward and made huge. >> absolutely. ailes changed america. you might say for the better or for the worst defending on whether you're a republican or a democrat. but he changed the face of television news, in a way for decades to come, even though he passed away this morning.

i was speaking with a fox source today that say ailes understood trump's base long before there was a president trump, he understood there was a disaffected portion of the country to program to and that's what fox continues to do. but partly because ailes has created fox, it's been joined by many other conservative media outlets that reinforce this counternarrative. >> brian, thanks very much. coming up, remembering one of our colleagues, a mexican journalist who covered one of the drug cartels and appeared on this program has been assassinated. we remember javier valdez next. tired of paying hundreds more a year in taxes and fees for your unlimited plan? only t-mobile gives you unlimited data with taxes and fees included. that'll save you hundreds. get two lines for a hundred dollars. that's right. two lines of unlimited data. a hundred bucks. all in. and right now, we're giving you even more. for a limited time, get a free samsung galaxy s8 when you buy one. that's two galaxy s8s for the price one! plus, two lines of unlimited data for a hundred bucks. taxes and fees included.

only at t-mobile. ♪ to err is human. to anticipate is lexus. experience the lexus rx with advanced safety standard. experience amazing. it'sand your doctor at yoto maintain your health.a because in 5 days, 10 hours and 2 minutes you are going to be 67. and on that day you will walk into a room where 15 people will be waiting... 12 behind the sofa, 2 behind the table and 1 and a half behind a curtain. family: surprise! but only one of them will make a life long dream come true. great things are ahead of you when your health is ready for them. at humana, we can help you with a personalized plan for your health for years to come. start your day with the number one choice of dentists. philips sonicare removes significantly more plaque versus oral-b 7000. experience this amazing feel of clean. innovation and you. ilips sonicare.

save now when you buy philips sonicare. radio: scorching heat today folks[ barks ]ol out there! walter! stop suffering with hot ac. cool it yourself with a/c pro. just connect the hose, squeeze the trigger and check the gauge. with 2 times the cooling boosters enjoy the comfort of the #1 selling coldest air. nothing cools like a/c pro.

tragic news about a mexican journalist who reported on drug trafficking. javier valdez was killed, shot dead, the fifth journalist to be killed in mexico this year. he was killed in mexico and our producer tells us that he was the only person willing to go on camera to talk about the risk of covering drug cartels. he said the staff of the paper that he founded lived in feared but never backed down from coverage. he was awarded the 2011 press freedom award from the committee to protect journalists. speaking at the scene, the prosecutor promised his department would allow more protection for journalists. thanks very much for watching "360." time to hand it over to don lemon. "cnn tonight" starts right now.

breaking news because of course it's a defiant president doubling down on the eve of his crucial first foreign trip. this is "cnn tonight." i am don lemon. after an uncharacteristic silence from the commander in chief, he can hold out no longer and speaks out, first in the series of tweets calling the naming of a special counsel witchhunt, bad for the country, his words. his own alternative reality in the midst of a crisis of his on creation, all the while insisting he did not ask james comey to back off michael flynn. but new details tonight in the "new york times," the president contacting comey, made him, quote, unsettled. members of the president's own inner circle now urging him to lawyer up. let get right to mark preston, jeff zeleny and michael isikoff. president p