thanks for watching. time to hang things over to done lemon and cnn tonight. >> announcer: this is cnn breaking news. breaking news a federal contractor charged with leaking top secret information. this is cnn tonight. i'm done lemon. 25-year-old reality lee winner accuse of classifying an memo on russian hacking. not once but twice in the wake of saturday's terror attack shooting himself on the foot in his travel ban, contradicting his own team and saying it exactly isn't what they say it isn't. let's get more to breaking news here. all of them join me. good evening to you. jim, there's new video tonight

on one of the london attackers being searched by police back in 2015. tell us what we're seeing and what happened at the time. >> so this is another example of where you have attacks like this play out where the attackers were known to authorities before the event as was this attacker. he's actually appeared in a number of videos including in a documentary on jihadis living in the city of london and here it is at another event where police had to respond to it where he was espousing extremist views. this happens. we saw it with the attackers at the "charlie hebdo" shooters. the trouble is they have so many people on their radar screen, it is difficult to impossible to have the resources to follow all of them. the other point i would make is that you had another case here where the attackers had been

reported to authorities by people within the muslim community. him for instance, twice before which gets at the this issue where you do have people in the community who are doing what authorities ask them. the trouble is the authorities is often overwhelmed and they can't keep track of all these folks before they lash out and carry out deadly attacks like this. >> i want you to update us on our other breaking news. a federal contractor charged with leaking classified information. >> this was a top secret nsa report so reflecting some of the latest intelligence on russian interference specific to a particularly alarming question and that is what was russia doing not just with information from stolen e-mails, et cetera, but with voting systems. we knew some information about this before election day that they had probed voter registration rolls in arizona, illinois. probing attacks on a contractor involved with voting systems in

florida. no evidence then, no evidence as of the most recent intelligence assessment that russia affected any votes or interfered with any vote tallies but this shows there's more information about probing attacks, that they were looking at these systems at least, doesn't mean the assessment changes that voting tallies were not messed with by russian hackers but it does show they were at least looking at these systems and perhaps most alarming going forward because when i speak to u.s. intelligence officials they constantly say 2016 was not the last election that russia will interfere with, they'll do the same in 2018 and 2020 and what does this say about future attacks going forward. >> swrm just told us what was in the document. what's your reaction to this breaking story. >> i think it really does present questions about whether the russias can get into our election. we've had trouble with voting booth in the past and voting processes. they've not been -- just think

of florida in 2000. i think it's important to press down and have a national effort. there ought to be some sort of commission on 911 that's looking at these things and that's what congress should do is figure out how do we protect ourselves against this ram pant hacking. >> 25-year-old contractor, her name is reality winner. she admitted to intentionally leaking this classified material. just 25 years old and in a heap of trouble. what do you think this could mean for leaks in the future? >> look, i obviously -- we don't know all the details of how this happened but it seems as though just e-mailing it shows the naivety of her age. >> we should say alleged. >> alleged, exactly. thank you for saying that. maybe she needs to watch more

spy movies about how these things are done, you know, and the journalists as well, that probably to receive something this classified via e-mail is not the greatest thing in the world to do. having said that, look, i mean i think -- it would be hypocritical to say that those of us who are covering all things russia would not be interested in seeing what real intelligence, the most recent report -- a recent report of what they're looking in to to be able to get that as a journalist is pretty remarkable understanding that there really are parameters when it comes to protecting sources and methods that we all try to do and jim knows this better than i. >> what did you want to say? >> one of the details, it's breaking fast. our understanding she actually snail mailed it, but still --

but still. >> then that's smarter. >> to your point there is still an electronic trail in that she printed it out from her office. >> she was the only person who had contact via e-mail with the organization. >> one, she printed it out from her computer and investigators were able to determine only six people printed it out and of those six people, one of them had e-mailed with this news outlet before. so there was a communication tie there the actual document she snailed mailed it. to your point, there was an electronic trail which as we all know in this day and age, those things don't disappear. >> i'm not sure i got an answer. the full answer from you, i'm wondering what does this mean in the future you think for leaks. >> it shows that there is -- that there really is a crackdown. it's not something that we didn't know. the president talks about it all the time. i will also say that -- >> and other members of his

administration. >> president obama and his administration, they were really, really tough on leakers of national security information and also -- i remember covering the bush administration post-9/11 reporting on something that was an nsa intercept and dic chain any started an investigation on capitol hill whether it came from there so it certainly is not new. >> let's talk about the former director of the fbi james comey testifying before congress and president trump is not going to invoke executive privilege to try to stop it. how big of a test will this be for president trump and his administration, david gergen? >> first of all, let's give credit to the white house and president trump for not invoking executive privilege. they could've done that. i think they did the right thing. when you do the right thing we ought to say so. goodness gracious. we take them on all the time on other things. james comey's testimony is i

think is extraordinary significant in terms of this particular episode and it may have historic effects. we'll have to wait and see. if he lays out a pattern of conduct which shows that the president and his team were trying very hard to shut down the flynn investigation, that is going to prove great weight to the whole question of obstruction. we're now hearing the democrats like mark warner saying we don't see evidence of collusion, we don't see any smoking gun yet on the collusion question but the obstruction of justice may turn out to be a more serious problem for the administration than the collusion issue. >> jim, as has been said by a number of people especially those who, you know, were around when watergate was going on and experienced that, you know, it started as something else and everything always starts as something else and it's usually what they uncover in the course of the investigation. >> white water led to monica

lewinsky. i think this is going to be a really remarkable moment because you're going to have the former head of the fbi effectively contradicting the president here on this and that -- that's a remarkable moment and we don't know how far he's going to go in public but the fact is, dana and others, my colleagues have spoken to people close to him. he's already leaked out his impression of those conversations, the message that the president was attempting to deliver to him. it becomes then a question for the lawyers and really for the public as to whether that is undo influence. it's partly a legal question, is this obstruction of justice but it's also -- it's a public opinion question, what is an intolerable abuse of power? or a step beyond the bounds, whatever you want to call it and is it when a president goes to his fbi director the highest or second highest after the attorney general law enforcement official in the country leading an investigation regarding a

foreign adversary into a presidential election with at least questions about the involvement of a senior advisors to president trump, is that proper in the view of the american people beyond what the lawyers say, it's going to be remarkable to hear that testimony and to hear where it goes, to hear what -- what the price is for that in effect? >> just in case you missed there was a big thing over david gergen, three days left, three days left until comey testified. thank you all. i appreciate it. i like the conversation. we come right back, jason chaffetz is here. i want to know what he thinks about this leaked memo and what he thinks james comey will say in his testimony on thursday.

when did you see the sign? when i needed to create a better visitor experience. improve our workflow. attract new customers. that's when fastsigns recommended fleet graphics. yeah! now business is rolling in. get started at fastsigns.com. yeah! now business is rolling in. at where instead of payinging a befor middlemen,em. we work directly with family farms to deliver higher quality ingredients for less than you pay at the store. get $30 off at blueapron.com/cook

so we know how to cover almost alanything.ything, even a coupe soup. [woman] so beautiful. [man] beautiful just like you. [woman] oh, why thank you.

[burke] and we covered it, november sixth, two-thousand-nine. talk to farmers. we know a thing or two because we've seen a thing or two. ♪ we are farmers. bum-pa-dum, bum-bum-bum-bum ♪ z282uz zwtz y282uy ywty ♪ ♪ award winning interface. award winning design. award winning engine. the volvo xc90. the most awarded luxury suv of the century.

visit your volvo dealer to take advantage of our midsommar sales event offer. here's breaking news tonight. a federal contractor with top secret security clearance charged with leaking classified information about russia's hacking of the election. i want to talk all of this with jason chaffetz soon to be former congressman. >> thanks for having me. >> we'll talk about that. hopefully we'll have time to talk about that. i want to get your reaction to this breaking news now. a 25-year-old woman charged for leaking classify material to online media outlet. should she go to jail? >> there's a right way and wrong way to do this. if you feel compelled to share information that's classified

because you're concerned about the implications there are legal ways in which you can have whistle-blower protection or go to committee for instance, on oversight and protect your legal rights and not get yourself into trouble. but just because you see something that is classified, you can't just hand that out like it's candy and whether or not you mailed it or printed it, you're not allowed to do that and yes, i do believe, regardless of the administration, they should put handcuffs on a person like that and they should go to jail. i don't know if this allegation is true, okay. i'm just reading a media report. but a contractor, a federal employee cannot just take it upon themselves to bypass the classification system. >> do you think in this environment where everything seems to be so partisan and political that someone would even feel comfortable doing it the right way as you say with whistle-blower protection? >> we have hundreds of thousands of people with security clearances, again there's a right way to do it, there's a way to go to congress and have that conversation, protect all your legal rights and not have looming over this young woman

what appears to be at least on the initial read she could go to jail for a significant amount of time. >> in terms of this top secret nsa report that supposedly deals with russian military intelligence on voting software, no evidence that any votes were effected but the fact that they were targeting that and that there was a possibility that they could have been, is that hugely concerning? >> oh, yeah. look, most of the elections are controlled by your local county clerk, so it's not really a federal role in minstering an election. it does go down to the states and then it goes down into your county. but let it be no mystery that the russians have been doing -- this is not the first election, it's probably not the last and it isn't just the russians. the fact that our government through working with contractors is paying attention to this and does have some evidence. of course congress wants to know about that but it also means they were probably doing their

job in watching it. >> when you look at this, if there's been no evidence so far of collusion. >> correct. >> do you think it makes it more important that we find out all things russia and how much of an effect they have? >> yeah. my friend and colleague devin nunes is the chairman of the house intelligence committee. he's taken some heat on some things, but it was more than a year ago when he was out there beating the drums saying let's worry about russia. i'm critical of my democratic colleagues when barack obama was running for reelection and mitt rop any said the political threat to the united states of america is russia, he was laughed at. the president kind of mocked him saying in the 1980s want their foreign policy back. mitt range of motiomney was rig remember all this happened under his watch. we were paying enough attention. >> you don't think he did enough to stop it. >> no. >> he told them to cut it out and i think what -- i think his supporters will say he was

concerned about it effecting or appearing to put his thumb on the scale, do you think that was -- >> the president has to protect us against all enemies foreign and domestic. he consistently downtown la played the threat of russia. they were on the march. explaining their borders globally but the counter intelligence activities those were all minimized. >> this president should maybe not speak so glowing sometimes about russia, that he should speak more forcefully against russia than he does? >> if you look at individual comments, maybe you and i would say things differently, but yes. again, let's not lose focus. it's not just russia, folks. it's a lot of other countries too. when you try to go and do everything digitally there's a consequence. >> russia appears to have more influence. >> russia's one of the most savvy. corporate espionage, trying to get involved in elections, these people have been doing this for decades. >> before too much time passes, let's talk about the former fbi

testifying on thursday. you've spoken to him recently. >> i did. >> what do you want to hear from him? first of all, can you share anything that you talked about? >> it was a very short conversation. i always found him to be very colleagual but i did want him to come to the oversight committee. he's chosen first to go to the senate committee. >> when the "the new york times" broke this story they had not actually seen the documents. i haven't seen the documents. i'm not aware of anybody in congress. >> did you ask him about that? >> and i did ask the director specifically. these documents that were in the "the new york times" article, do they have them or does the department of justice have them and he would not answer that question which i found kind of eyebrow raising. what is this answer? where are these? the oversight committee has asked for not just these documents related to a january 27th dinner with donald trump, but what about the attorney general loretta lynch, what about barack obama, what about all these other memos? >> they're not being

investigated. >> yes, they are investigating that. >> did he tell you why he didn't want to answer your question about it? >> no and i respected his answer. i peppered that question to the department of justice. their response is, well now there's a special council involved and that does complicate thing but at the same time we believe congress should be able to see these documents. >> what do you hear from him? >> if you don't have the documents it'll be hard to question him. why is it when he testified i believe it was the first week of may and before the senate judiciary committee, he said that there had been no political interference. you have the current acting fbi director saying he's seen no evidence of any sort of political influence. so there's going to be a contradiction if he tries to go the other direction, but -- >> so who do you believe more? it appears from now that his testimony may be at odds with what the president says happened? >> who do you believe? >> you want to hear from both sides but if there's a document

sort of memorializing this i want to see what that document says and how is it interpreted because it's a pretty high bar to suggest that there was an obstruction of justice or there was some sort of collusion or something like that. >> are you counting the days when you don't really have to deal with this as personal level because you're a month -- >> i love the engagement. >> when's your end date? >> june 30th is my last day. after eight and a half years it's time to hang up the cleats. >> your future involve any three letters or four letters cnn, fnc, msnbc. >> definitely. >> maybe. >> look at the time here, done. there's a commercial i'm sure that you have to go to at this point. >> it's a definite maybe. >> yes. >> any more than that? >> people break a lot of news on this show. >> and i have with you. i love being on here, but more on that later. >> thank you, congressman, soon

to be former congressman. >> thank you. >> a former cia director and former white house counsel join me and what they think about this leak. how the white house will handle what could be explosive testimony from james comey? ♪ what the road demands, the gs delivers. experience high performance through high technology. in the lexus gs 350 and gs turbo. experience amazing. no need with thending thcars.com app when on the lot, scan a vin to pull up all the info you need to help get the price you want. start scanning today.

i was thinking around 70. to and before that?re? you mean after that? no, i'm talking before that. do you have things you want to do before you retire? i'd really like to run with the bulls. wow. hope you're fast. i am. get a portfolio that works for you now and as your needs change with investment management services.

peobut they're different.ind it's nice to remove artificial ingredients. kind never had to. we choose real ingredients like almonds, peanuts and a drizzle of dark chocolate. give kind a try. ♪

former fbi director james comey set to testify before the senate intelligence committee on thursday. i want to bring ambassador former director of the cia and john dean the former white house counsel for president nixon whose the author of conservatives without conscience. good to have both of you on. i'm going to get to comey in just a minute. i want to get your take on the breaking news. this federal contractor under arrest for allegedly leaking classified information to an online media outlet. the report supposedly details a 2016 russian military intelligence cyberattack on a u.s. voting software supplier. what's your reaction to this story? >> this is just the first big public round of this we're seeing. we'll see a lot of it.

we made a bunch of changes in our voting system after the mess in 2000 in florida and one thing that we now have is about a quarter of our voting machines are touch screen only and don't have paper backup of any kind. that means about a quarter of our votes cannot be recounted because you can't -- you cannot recount what is in thin air and on electronics that the russians and others have tampered with. so unless we make whatever decisions and recommendations we want to make relatively soon with respect to this current mess with russia and voting, and move on to fixing our systems so that they can deal fairly and honestly with the next election, we're going to be in real trouble here in our democracy. we've got to have elections work right and having the russians sitting there on the other side

of the table and degreefully picking things apart and shutting down areas that are going to crash and adjusting totals and others, we're -- we're sitting ducks unless we get busy and pay attention to the right election which is the next one, not the last one. >> i want to get through this. so brevity is a key here. i have limited time with you. john, what is your reaction to this breaking news story? >> i was surprised how quickly they brought together the elements for a prosecution. they're doing it under the 1970 espionage act and this young lady is in trouble. they've got looks like very solid evidence, computer tracking went right to her, so i think they're sending a clear message to leakers here. >> 25 years old, my goodness very young. i want to talk about comey's big testimony on thursday. the white house now saying the president won't stop the former

fbi director from testifying. woents invoke executive privilege. is that the right move? >> it is a charade, done, is what it is. there is no executive privilege here. in fact, i've written a piece for cnn for tomorrow, it'll be up tomorrow where i go deeper than we can tonight explaining exactly the history of this and why this is really -- there's no basis whatsoever in history or in any of the concepts of executive privilege for invoking it in this situation. they're really just saying we're not going to invoke it, although they didn't have the privilege to invoke as if they're granting him the right to testify and not blocking him when that really isn't possible. >> i want to get both of your takes on what you think he will say. but first i want to play something for you. this is what senator burr says how he's going to testify coming thursday, listen. >> they've talked but i understand that the special

counsel has not fenced him off any way, shape or form from the items he intends to talk about. >> and those items he tends to talk about are what? >> it's about russia's involvement in our 2016 election which is the investigation and that does lead in to the possibility of collusion by either campaign but it also gets into questions that have been raised publicly about conversations that may or may not have taken place. >> so comey has talked to robert mueller and it means nothing is off the table, that's what we've heard. how damaging could this be for the white house potentially ambassador? >> i don't know. i sometimes can do a fairly good job of getting inside the heads of terrorists and dictators, but i can never figure out what american politicians are going to do or why they're going to do it. i'll punt this one to john, john dean who knows this area cold. >> in your answer, what do you expect comey to say and what

damage could be done, john? >> i think -- first of all going to be a great witness. he's skilled. he's well trained. he's got a lot of experience on the hill. he knows where he can and cannot safely walk as far as the special investigation, special counsel's investigation and he probably won't go there if he thinks he could damage the prosecution. so i think what he'll do is lay out exactly what he did with the president, what will be most interesting, don and most telling quickly does he have a prepared statement. if he does then he'll have careful thought out what he's going to say and how he's going to say it and that's not the usual comey format. so that'll be the first sign, is there a prepared statement. >> it's interesting, it's the first i've ever heard of that. at other hearing he took part in he was giving his own recollection and recalling what he what happened and what he saw

this investigation or influence or what have you. if he has reading from a prepared text, you think that means he's been overly careful. >> i think it means he's thought out what he wants to present and how he wants to present it and we'll get some signs of what kind of case he might think there is or not there and he certainly didn't try to entrap the president. i think he'll explaining that he tried to deal with a rookie president but then he'll put it back in a larger context where trump kept doing this -- >> if he said the president pressured him or he confirms that the president, he did have those conversations according to the memos with the president, does that amount to obstruction? >> it could. not necessarily isolated but he has a bigger picture now that he's been fired and that was part of a final act of as far as james comey goes so i think he'll look at it differently

than when those conversations first happened. >> unfortunately, we're out of time. thank you all. we'll see you back on this program soon. the vice president's message to nato to stand united and strong. not exactly what the president's been saying. ♪ surfing is a sport that takes a lot out of you physically. from the moment i wake up on my tempur-pedic mattress i feel like i am ready to take on the day. i don't have aches and pains from the previous day's training and i feel like myself. i wake up feeling stronger.

a better surfer. a better me. ♪ now through june 11th, save $600 when you buy select tempur-pedic adjustable mattress sets. find your exclusive retailer at tempurpedic.com. "america" by simon and is that good?strumental) yeah it's perfect. bees! bees! go! go! go!

[ girl catching her breath } [ bees buzzing inside vehicle ] the all-new volkswagen atlas. with easy-access 3rd row. life's as big as you make it.

the energy conscious whopeople among usle? say small actions can add up to something... humongous. a little thing here. a little thing there. starts to feel like a badge maybe millions can wear. who are all these caretakers, advocates too? turns out, it's californians it's me and it's you. don't stop now, it's easy to add to the routine. join energy upgrade california and do your thing.

president trump is not done tweeting about his travel ban. tonight he says, that's right. we need a travel ban for certain dangerous countries. not some politically correct term that won't help us protect our people. let's discuss now dan rather the host of access tv and jamie reuben and a former advisor to hillary clinton's 2016 campaign. so much to discuss, there may abe new tweet by the time we're done with this. before he with talk about that, i want to get your take on contractor, federal contractor being charged with leaking nsa material on russian hacking, dan? >> first of all this young woman's in a lot of trouble because they're invoking the espionage act of 1917. it goes all the way back to the period of world war i and leaking this kind of material

for whatever purpose, whatever motive can be a serious criminal offense. so she's in some trouble. what was revealed it moves the story a little further in the direction of what we talked about so many times before and that is what is it that president trump and those around him are hiding about the russian involvement? now, this business of hacking in to the actual voting system as someone said on this program earlier, we have real problems with voting machines that i and some others did an investigation several years ago and it's increased since then. we do have to look into this and find out what the facts are, but take that material and what the other things we know about the russians hacking and hacking into the voting system, find out what happened because we need to get this squared away before the next presidential election. >> she's just accused of leaking but as john dean said it seems

they have pretty strong evidence in this case. let's talk about president trump. do you want to weigh in on the leaking part? you good? president trump he's taken to twitter and defending his travel ban. he's undermining his own justice department. you saw the tweet i read earlier on the air. this is one that's about the mayor of london. pathetic excuse by london mayor who had to think fast on his no reason to be alarmed statement, mainstream media is working hard to sell it. here's the mayor. listen to this carefully. >> london is increased police presence today and over the course of the next few days. no reason to be alarmed. one of the things the police and all of us need to do is make sure we're safe as we possibly can be. i'm reassured that we're one of the safest global cities in the world if not the safest in the world. >> it is glaring obvious that he mischaracterized what the mayor was saying there and doubling, tripling down on and even

members of his own administration doing the same thing. what impact do you think this has on the u.s. on the world stage? >> there's history between these two people. i haven't seen this mentioned as much as it should have been tonight, when the first time the president talked about a muslim ban, the mayor of london announced that he wasn't going to come to the united states. the president said there would be exceptions for important people or something and he said, if there's a ban on muslims coming, i won't come. so he escalated a discussion that was occurring about this very subject. so in other words, the president regards the london mayor as his political enemy and the really sad part about this is is that the london mayor is a terrific mayor. he's the most prominent muslim elected official potentially in the world and since everybody knows, everyone whose doing

serious work about this is that if we're ever going to put a stop to these kind of terrorist attacks it's going to require the moderate muslim leaders to have a greater impact on the extremists within society. this mayor in london is the kind of person we should be helping, not the attacking. >> this is personal for him for the president. >> i think it is. >> you believe he's gone after him -- >> personally. he wanted to find a mistake in his comments. there's the guy who messed with my muslim ban and then he found something and he was dead wrong. he never admits he's wrong. that's the basis of his campaign and his presidency, never admit you're wrong, deny, deny and just move on to the next charge. >> did he backfire on him? >> i think it has. it may be personal but it's outrageous and this is not in keeping with the tone, spirit and substance that the overwhelming majority of the american people expect of their

president, any president. i have a reason to believe that many, many people who voted for donald trump and are still support him would shake their heads at this and say, i wish he wouldn't do this because this is not a reflection. the british are a great people. they've been our allies for a long time. they're under pressure at the moment, under extreme pressure and fooling around with these tweets and taking out personal vengeance on people this is unworthy of a president of the united states. >> exactly, dan. i live in london. i'm visiting here in new york and the people of london really are extraordinary in their ability to back in the 77 attacks in 2005 if i got my dates right and they showed then and they're showing now that they have this reciviliencesy built into their system going back to the ira days. if we can't work constructively with our closest allies in the world and the desire to, you know, insult and harm a friend, the kind of friend we need if

we're going to succeed, what it boils down to is this concept in my mind, all of the things that the president has said in nato and the trips, i know we'll talk about that in a minute. what if today another terrible attack happened in the united states, what would the rest of the world say? i remember we are all americans, the phrase by the french, very powerful statement. i remember being moved by that idea that we really were all in this together in the west, because of donald trump's failure to take up the leadership of the west, whatever you want to call that, i'm worried that if something happened, if we're in a crisis and we need our allies and want our allies that we've harmed the ability of our government to work constructively in a crisis. this is all just small beer essentially for us. it's obviously awful for the british tonight. but what about a real crisis, a potential conflict.

>> will our allies come to our aid. >> how will they feel and will they work with the president? >> president trump blindsided his own national security team when he didn't reaffirm america's commitment in article five in his speech to nato. mcmaster and tillerson and mattis all thought that he would. what do you think about that? >> this is a real major issue and it's just going to take a minute to explain, please bear with me. defense in the current era with countries like russia is based on do they believe, in their head, do they believe that the west will act together? will the united states come to the defense of a small european country, it's about what does mr. putin think, that's deterrence. that has been severely undermined because they're talking about the very concept we want the russians to believe, that we will all work together.

>> and the key thing here is the president leaving out, refusing to say that the very core of nato, an attack on one nato member will be considered an attack on all, that's the red beating heart of the whole nato appliance, which, by the way, has helped keep the peace for well over a half a century. i'm reminded when president trump does these things it's inexplicable to me, he's not -- he's not dumb as dirt, despite some of the things he does. he has some intelligence. nato took a long time to build and to paraphrase sam ray burn, anybody cannot down a barn, it takes a real carpen ter to build one. and president trump is tearing it down and smiling is at the russians and putin and chinese. they love this. >> the vice president is reaffirming america's commitment or this administration's commitment to nato. is he trying to clean up for --

>> this has been happening all along. i was at a familiar cruc defense conference when the vice president came in the early days of the administration where he said the right things about nato and the secretary of defense said the right thing. but because so much attention is now presented on -- they don't care about that and the rest of the european and putin doesn't care about that. what they care about is what does the new commander in chief think? >> the vice president's not the commander in chief of anything. only the president's commander in chief and only what the president says really matters. >> that's -- when do we pay attention to the president what he says and his tweets and you said, always, right? >> always. he's president. what he says matters. >> and this matters because this is about what happens in a crisis. >> right. >> this is all prepping up, we hope never comes but if it happened would we have allies, what would the president do?

what would vladimir putin think the president would do? that's the problem. >> thank you, gentlemen. i appreciate it. >> we'll be right back. (burke) at farmers, we've seen almost everything,

so we know how to cover almost anything. even a coupe soup. [woman] so beautiful. [man] beautiful just like you. [woman] oh, why thank you. [burke] and we covered it, november sixth, two-thousand-nine. talk to farmers. we know a thing or two because we've seen a thing or two. ♪ we are farmers. bum-pa-dum, bum-bum-bum-bum ♪ garden weeds are scoundrels. with roundup precision gel®, you can banish them without harming plants nearby. so draw the line. give the stick one click, touch the leaves and the gel stays put killing garden weeds to the root. draw the line with roundup precision gel®. just turn on cars.coms on tprice dropswant? and get real-time notifications that could help save you money.

use cars.com and save. ray's always been different. last year, he said he was going to dig a hole to china. at&t is working with farmers to improve irrigation techniques. remote moisture sensors use a reliable network to tell them when and where to water. so that farmers like ray can compete in big ways. china. oh ... he got there. that's the power of and. there's nothing more than my vacation.me so when i need to book a hotel room, i want someone that makes it easy to find what i want. booking.com gets it. they offer free cancellation if my plans change.

visit booking.com. booking.yeah. [ intense music playing ] ] it's here, but it's going by fast. the opportunity of the year is back: the mercedes-benz summer event. get to your dealer today for incredible once-a-season offers, and start firing up those grilles. lease the e300 for $569 a month at your local mercedes-benz dealer. mercedes-benz. the best or nothing. president trump loves twitter. his staff?

maybe not so much. let's discuss -- >> everything he says on twitter and very little of what he does as president. >> it's his preferred method of communication with the american people. >> that's not true. >> they're a statement to the american people of what he wa s wants. >> it's social media. >> it's not social media. it's his words, his thoughts. >> it's social media. please understand the difference. >> the president says this is what i want. are you saying we shouldn't listen to what the president says? >> you shouldn't obsess about it for -- >> and a former special assistant to gorge w. bush. we could find a number of sound bites saying how important social media is to the president and how it bypasses the

so-called fake media. what do you make of his slamming the top eight quote obsession with his tweets. >> when you get to the white house you learn the president's words matter. whether they're on twitter. and so the press is right and the public is right to treat these things as the presidential statements. he might as well be standing in the east room delivering a speech. they cannot be discounted because he's making policy pronunciations on twitter. he has to live with that. >> he says trump's tweets are actually more important than the more formal statements coming out of the white house because they represent closer to what he believes on nearly every issue. do you agree with that? >> i do. and i virtually agree with everything he said. i think a presidential statement is a presidential statement

whether it comes from the oval office, the rose garden or on a twitter feed. they used it to convey his message and as sarah sanders today, bypassing the media and getting the message directly to the people. the problem is they run into difficulties say -- you have media saying you're obsessing about the tweets. you have to say let's just ignore everything he says on twitter. but you can't do that. these are statements. this is an actual accounting of exactly what the president is thijing and feeling. when his message on twitter is not the same they're trying to drive from the white house pushing their legislative agenda. >> what did you want to say? >> well, a lot of people today are talking about all the president's words matter and i agree the president's words do

matter. i have not heard donald trump argue that his words are any different than written down. you should read what i'm saying on social media because it's how i feel. and in the case of today, you talk about the travel ban today. i think the president is expressing what is on his card. there are some lawyers who say it's not going to matter. but there's not a businessman large or small who hasn't expressed frustration with lawyers and the way we describe things in the legal process. that served him well on the campaign and i think his instinct to keep doing it. >> how does one differentiate between the president's statement or a tweet? especially when members of his own innercircle -- they speak to him every day, they're saying it

doesn't really mean anything. but the president says unless you hear it from me. so what should they believe, scott? >> well, i think at the end of the day the buck stops with the president of the united states. his wrurds the ones that matter. i think advisors can have opinions beuti don't think he'd be saying the things if he didn't a believe it or talk bute it. >> why are they out saying that on television when most people can see what they're saying has no basis in reality? >> i don't know. and i don't work for the white house and don't pretend to know what they're doing on a daily basis. it's the president's words that matter in any white house. advisors and sfafs can have all the commentary they want but at the owned of the day this president, since he's been running and serving as presid t

president -- and directly to the american people has served him well. i think he's going to keep doing it. but the reality is we're in for four years of the president who wants to communicate directly and not explain it after the fact. >> listen, i thij think you're exactly right. and the only question i have is why are the advisors saying something different? and sarah huckabee sanders waw saying exactly opposite in the press briefing. scott said he's not sure whether calling it a travel ban is going to help or hurt him. we can debate that. but is kellyanne conway's husband in the dog house? he said these tweets may help some people feel better but won't help osg get five votes in

scotus which is what actually matters. sad. >> good for him. he's been sitting there silently. his opinion is one shared by a lot of attorneys and kudos to him for saying what he believes. >> i would guess that he probably didn't ask if kellyanne if this was okay. but i think he's got a good point and while president trump has used twitterer very effectively, often times it's caused a great deal of self inflicted wounds and the more he talks about the travel ban or the muslim ban or not a ban or is a ban on twitter, i think it sets up problems for the case as it goes higher up in the court system. so i think less is more in this case and i think he and the staff would be best served driving their message with regard to ---ing. >> yes, because this was

supposed to be quickly. but maybe mr. conway is maybe upset about his wife being contradicted by the person she's working for? she's seen as a loyal servient and every time the president contradicts it. >> i think he has a first amendment right to express his views. he's a very respected lawyer and he's got a twitter account just like the rest of us. and he came back later and made other statements that softened it a little bit but at the end of the day -- well, i hear you. but i still think what we're talking about is what the president said is go tag hurt or help. it's not a forgone conclusion it's going to hurt. i'm not arguing it's going to make it easier at the supreme court but i think he's got a

reasonable chance to win.

this is cnn breaking news. >> breaking news. a 25-year-old charged with leaking a top secret report. i'm don lemon. reality winner accused of leaking a classified memo on russian ha