is a physical activity that connects us to other people. over 200 people took part in our study. and some of them, brisk walking, one group did stretching and toning. and one group did dancing. and all of them participated for six months. in all other groups, saw typical age related deterioration of the brain, in the dancing group we observed some improvement in one of the brain regions that's involved in memory. >> we'll do probably 10 to 12 different dances, each one which we need to learn. >> it is a puzzle, you're putting the pieces together. >> dancing has been a big contributor helping me stay younger feeling. i didn't say that, i will tell you i didn't say that. and there would be nothing wrong if i did say it. >> one of them is lying. >> would you be willing to speak

under oath to give your version? >> 100%. >> a he said he said situation. both guys say the other one is lying. >> when will you tell us? >> over a fairly short period of time. you're going to be fairly disappointed when you hear it. >> the house says enough is enough. >> demanding to know if tapes exist. that deadline is june 23rd. >> no collusion, he is an obstructer, he is a leaker. we want to get back to running our great country. hope you're getting some r and r this morning, we're here to tell you what's going on. good to see you, i am christi paul. >> martin savidge in for victor blackwell. trump is spending the weekend at his new jersey golf club. the battle between he and james comey is turning into a he said he said showdown. the president slamming comey after his stunning testimony on capitol hill. take a listen. >> no collusion, no obstruction,

he's a leaker, but we want to get back to running our great country. >> so now lawmakers are demanding those memos and recordings if there are any and any other records of president trump's conversations with comey be given to them by june 23rd. that's not all. we should point out senator dianne feinstein asking the judiciary committee to investigate the potential of obstruction of justice. >> a lot of voices weighing in. paul callan, cnn legal analyst, juliet juliette kayyem, and errol lewis, and lynn sweet, bureau chief for chicago sun times. after all that, let me give you one more name.

bring in cnn washington correspondent ryan nobles at the white house. president trump is essentially accusing comey of perjury. what's next in this investigation? >> reporter: essentially, the investigation continues, martin, regardless of spin from both sides, james comey's testimony neither convicts nor vindicates president trump. instead, it's just really another step in a very lengthy process of a very complicated investigation. the main is conducted by robert mueller, former fbi director and special counsel, and the president accusing james comey of not telling the truth. the president saying he, too, would be willing to give his version of their conversation and what he told comey about michael flynn under oath as well. take a listen. >> so he said those things under oath. would you be willing to speak under oath to give your version of events? >> 100%.

i didn't say under oath. i hardly know the man. i wouldn't say i want you to pledge aliejance. who would ask a man to pledge allegiance under oath. think of it. i hardly know the man. no, i didn't say that and i didn't say the other. >> if robert mueller. >> i would be glad to tell him what i just told you. >> that's the president saying he would be willing to talk to robert mueller. there's no word whether mueller is interested in deposing the president on this particular issue, but mueller's investigation is just one part of this massive, complicated situation. we have investigations continuing on both the house and senate side, and the house intelligence committee in particular would like to put to rest the question of whether or not any tapes exist of these conversations between james comey and donald trump. this is something the president alluded to in a tweet a few weeks ago. they sent a letter to white house counsel, demanding to know whether the tapes exist, if they

do for them to be handed over to the committee, set a deadline of june 23rd for the white house to respond. martin, christi? >> appreciate it. want to bring back the panel here. let's talk about the date looming now, june 23rd. i want to ask you if these things, the comey memo would likely be turned over, but the white house, if there are recordings and if they're not turned in by june 23rd, is there a consequence to that? >> there should be. hopefully the president is smart enough to learn from watergate that we shouldn't be taping. former administration could very well have tapes of meetings that were held in trump tower with some type of equipment, surveillance equipment, whatever it may be. we know there was listening devices going on. but president trump has got to get past this. look, comey is a career manager. didn't have a problem with this when he had a job, as soon as he loses his job, all of a sudden

he has a problem. the white house has to continue to get the message out. so many wonderful things they're working on. faa, this week, huge feather in his cap to get that legislation passed, but he has to get those back to the forefront, and the continually drag, whether it be russian interference, the republican administration has to show what they do better than democrats, that this continually drag and beat isn't helpful for the administration to get things done. >> paul kellen, the president, somebody has to know if there are tapes or not. somebody knows this. and yet it is dragging out and the president as we heard him is saying you're going to hear shortly, he's building this drama. my question is why is there not a clear cut answer and what is the point of dragging it out? who benefits? >> you know, martin, i agree that it is very strange. i think it is downright bizarre that the president's playing games about this tape issue. i mean, he sent out a tweet

initially, kind of a warning shot at comey saying you better watch out, there may be tapes. now obviously if there are tapes, it would be the president's side that would have the tape. and now he is hedging, saying you'll find out. he said i think to one of the reporters yesterday that you're going to be disappointed. now what does that mean, disappointed that tapes back him up or that tapes don't exist. i don't know why the president would be hedging so much about existence of the tapes. they either exist or they don't. let's get to the bottom line here. >> lynn sweet, does the white house have to respond in some way whether there are or are not tapes? they can't just gloss over it, they're going to have to answer to somebody, yes? >> well, we're not dealing with anything conventional. i hope when historians look at our segment today they're aware that this is a whole new

dimension of extraordinary absurdity. the president creates a fire storm of his own making as this incredible episode of his reality show. i don't know if there are tapes of all nine conversations that he had with robert comey. it doesn't matter who accuses who of lying, the transcripts and natural recordings will tell us something. this is a side show. if you're thinking of donald trump being selfish wanting to govern the country, he has the power to end. when he talked about pledging ali allegiance, that's not the main point of what comey was talking about, it was whether or not he was being pressured to end an investigation of michael flynn. so yeah, in a conventional world, of course they shouldn't have started this line of questioning about tapes if they

didn't exist. what does president trump do at some point when he has to say if the tapes exist or not. that's going to be a very suspenseful buildup. i think that's just what trump likes, without thinking of the consequence of how it handcuffs him in governing the country. >> right. i think it is an answer the mrn peop american people deserve. senator feinstein asking for investigation into obstruction of justice, what's the purpose of this. isn't that part of what mueller is going to broadly be investigating in all this or what am i missing? >> sure, of course. some of the confusion, martin, comes when you have politicians for political reasons throwing around legal terminology. obstruction of justice is a very narrowly defined kind of legal question, but the politicians are kind of throwing it around as well. that would only be appropriate if and only if they get to something resembling hearings in

the direction of impeachment. for feinstein and other politicians, that's just where they want to be, maybe getting a little ahead of themselves in talking about that. the reality is you've got a competent, more than competent special counsel in the form of bob mueller who's going to get to the bottom of all this. nothing is going to escape him, if it looks like it could be criminal obstruction of justice, he will then take all of the appropriate investor ian legal steps to be sure crimes are fully investigated and aired in the proper forum. that proper forum at least now is not going to be congress, that's not really where we are just yet. we need a lot more facts. that's what the request for information is about, whether it is a recording, comey's diaries or anything else. >> you look at the big picture between this taking up so much space this week it seemed and then even yesterday with the

cover or qatar information, the president saying one thing, secretary of state tillerson saying another, how is this playing out in terms of the president's credibility internationally? >> well, it's not playing out well and i think it shows a white house, if not a d.c., unable to function with one clear voice. this is the problem with trump's sort of lack of discipline which you're seeing both in the comey issue and russia trump investigation, and now seeing international affairs. he doesn't say he is committed to nato, then says in passing at a press conference yesterday, they're all over the place. you have the qatar ambassador pleading on twitter, this is where we are now, for the united states to sort of own up to the humanitarian crisis that qatar is facing and the fact that we have a military base in qatar seems to have been unknown to president trump until the last

couple days. to be clear to viewers, are all our anti-isis missions abroad stemming from qatar, this isn't some random country in a fight with saudi arabia. the center is not holding, the white house does not have its insistent voice, but on the other hand the idea that this administration is going to get over the russia, trump issue is just wrong. this thing is continuing because of either obstruction of justice or back to the main point because russia had influence in our election and this white house seems unconcerned by that basic fact which i think is the take away from comey that trump never asked about russia, he only asked about himself. >> all right. the panel will stick around. we want to continue the conversation. there's a lot more to talk about. we'll do it after the break.

there's nothing more than my vacation.me so when i need to book a hotel room, i want someone that makes it easy to find what i want. booking.com gets it. they offer free cancellation if my plans change. visit booking.com. booking.yeah.

when they thought they should westart saving for retirement.le then we asked some older people when they actually did start saving. this gap between when we should start saving and when we actually do is one of the reasons why too many of us aren't prepared for retirement. just start as early as you can. it's going to pay off in the future. if we all start saving a little more today, we'll all be better prepared tomorrow. prudential. bring your challenges.

how if guests book direct ater, choicehotels.com and stay twice they'll get a $50 gift card? summertime. badda book. badda boom. got you a shirt! ...i kept the receipt... book now at choicehotels.com essential for him, but maybe not for people with rheumatoid arthritis. because there are options. like an "unjection™". xeljanz xr. a once daily pill for adults with moderate to severe ra for whom methotrexate did not work well. xeljanz xr can reduce pain, swelling and joint damage, even without methotrexate. xeljanz xr can lower your ability to fight infections, including tuberculosis. serious, sometimes fatal infections, lymphoma and other cancers have happened. don't start xeljanz xr if you have an infection.

tears in the stomach or intestines, low blood cell counts and higher liver tests and cholesterol levels have happened. your doctor should perform blood tests before you start and while taking xeljanz xr, and monitor certain liver tests. tell your doctor if you were in a region where fungal infections are common and if you have had tb, hepatitis b or c, or are prone to infections. needles. fine for some. but for you, one pill a day may provide symptom relief. ask your doctor about xeljanz xr. an "unjection™".

the blockade is also impairing the u.s. and other business activities in the region, created a hardship on the people of qatar and people whose livelihood depends on commerce with qatar. the blockade is hampering military actions and the campaign against isis. >> the campaign to call on qatar to end its funding, they have to end that funding. and its extremist ideology in terms of funding. i want to call on all other nations to stop immediately supporting terrorism. >> that's president trump apparently contradicting what his own secretary of state said earlier that same day. at issue, where to come down on the blockade against qatar by

several neighbors. >> reminder, three gulf nations aligned with egypt against qatar, accusing the country of supporting terrorism and destabilizing the region. qatar hosts 11,000 u.s. troops, a hub in the area war against isis. a white house official says the president's statements were consistent with what the secretary of state said. want to bring back the panel. help us understand how critical it is in the fight against isis, the destabilization we're seeing. >> it is about the worst for the fight against isis. the mimt -- military is there. at a moment when the fight against isis is going well. there are serious battles going on in iraq and syria. this is so consequential, what is happening right now for our

particular national security interests, and why trumds would have originally side with the saudis which i have to admit have some nerve complaining about qatar supporting terrorism is just sort of mind boggling to those of us who are mostly worried for our national security about isis. it looks like tillerson tried to create a space for donald trump to sort of redeem that original assessment, and donald trump did not take it. look, in our history we as united states have been loved, we have been hated. we have never been so confusing i think to the world. i think that's where we are now, and it is making us, our allies very concerned about our stability and our ability to live up to our word, and it is making countries like russia and china sort of step into the vacuum. that's sort of where we are now. >> errol, this seems to have come out of nowhere for most

americans, yet seems to have perhaps been instigated in part because of the president's visit to saudi arabia. can you make that quick connection to us? >> sure. the president himself seems to suggest that hey, look at the benefits of my trip. i go and a week later we have got action against terrorism. however, it is taking the form of a looming humanitarian disaster, if nothing else, as well as serious confusion around an important region. so yeah, this is the president's doing, if he says he did it, let's take him at his word. the timing is not just coincidental. it does tend to follow a pattern, since we now see sort of confusion, destabilization, some of which originated through cyber attack mischief in around the qatar news agency. we have a shadow war threatening to be a shooting war, white house doesn't seem to be on top

of events they may have help set into motion. >> that's a terrifying thought. all right. the panel is going to stick around. we want to continue our conversation. there's more we have to touch upon. stay with us. >> stay with us. this is something that's probably going to be curious to a lot of you just waking up. remember, joe biden, mitt romney once rivals. the former vice president is encouraging romney to run for the senate. we'll talk about it. . i did active duty 11 years. and two in the reserves. our 18 year old was in an accident. when i call usaa it was that voice asking me, "is your daughter ok?" that's where i felt relief. it actually helped to know that somebody else cared and wanted make sure that i was okay. that was really great. we're the rivera family, and we will be with usaa for life. usaa. we know what it means to serve. call today to talk about your insurance needs.

fmy doctor recommended ibgard. abdominal pain and bloating. now i'm in control of my ibs. nonprescription ibgard - calms the angry gut. house and senate investigators firing a litany of requests for former fbi director james comey memos after his sworn testimony against president trump. >> defiant president trump is challenging james comey's claims that the president demanded his loyalty and asked him to let go of the investigation into fired national security adviser michael flynn.

listen here. >> so he said those things under oath. would you be willing to speak under oath to give your version? >> 100%. i didn't say under oath. i hardly know the man. i'm not going to say i want you to pledge allegiance. who would do that. who would ask a man to pledge allegiance under oath. think of it. i hardly know the man. it doesn't make sense. no, i didn't say that and i didn't say the other. >> if robert mueller wanted to speak to you about that. >> i would be glad to tell him what i just told you. >> the panel is back with us. paul, you wrote a piece for cnn.com saying for trump, prosecution of comey would be a disaster. >> yes. christi, i think it is going to be catastrophic for his presidency. the last time this was done where a special prosecutor began investigating a sitting president was in bill clinton's administration and that resulted in impeachment charges being filed against clinton. of course, they were dismissed

in the end but it was a disaster. and i think he's setting the scene for this. just one other thing, the clip you were playing. i chuckle when i watch it. wolf blitzer ran a piece yesterday with the president standing in front of i think around 30,000 people. >> a crowd, yes, in orlando. in march of 2016. >> and he said to them i want you all to raise your hands and pledge loyalty to me. the whole crowd. i think in the past he's asked strangers to pledge loyalty to him. so there you go. >> lynn sweet, let me ask you this. we obviously live in very interesting times. even more so now because here we have joe biden, former vice president, and democrat, who is apparently encouraging mitt romney to run for senate. what is going on there? >> well, i think we have to put an asterisk, depends on what state. certainly mitt romney who is

governor of massachusetts with the -- you don't want to have him run in massachusetts where you could elect a democrat. i think the intent is if he runs in utah, where mitt romney has a home and has connections and is well known there to replace orrin hatch, if indeed orrin hatch decides not to run for an eighth term, then biden is saying mitt romney would be an addition to the senate. in the context of these times, someone with his background, experience, to put in a more or less moderate republican could make sense to joe biden. but step one is joe biden talking about utah which is going to elect a republican, that's what i think joe biden is talking about, because if he's talking about running in massachusetts, that won't be great for democrats necessarily. i think he's talking about utah. so that's a great cross aisle move for biden, both look like

senior statesmen now. >> good point. i want to get back and look forward to what is to come yet in the russian investigation. we know that jared kushner is meeting with the senate intel committee later this month. how candid do you think he'd be? >> i think he'll be very candid. they need to get this past them, they need to be clear and concise, don't need to muddy the water any more. earlier it was talked about how this could drag on, as an american i don't want to see it, i don't think good comes out of it. the whole statement was ambiguous. really, comey should have had whatever you want to call it to question the president then, say mr. president i didn't understand exactly what you were asking me to do. and he should have done it. this is absolutely drain the swamp. this is probably the biggest bureaucrat there was in washington. he was right to be fired, but he should have right then questioned the president on what he meant, if he thought there was any impropriety whatsoever.

i hope kushner will get to the point and move past this because it is hindering so many accomplishments they could be having with control of both houses. >> juliette, in the time left, interested in what you're hearing from those in law enforcement that you talk to about former fbi director comey's testimony. what's the reaction from law enforcement? >> look, i think most people view comey as truthful although a lot of us i think across the aisle sometimes question his judgment, so the difference between is he telling the truth that trump said those things, yes. it was his judgment. andres said maybe he should have been more forceful or something else, that's a legitimate debate. the truthfulness of the interactions i don't think anyone doubts. picking up on what andres said, look, the white house has a big problem not just from thursday testimony but from wednesday testimony where every head of

the intelligence agency refused to say no to the question, did donald trump try to get you to stop this investigation, and now next week we not only have jared kushner in the next couple weeks, next week sessions, our attorney general, who was definitely implicated in some of those conversations, what does sessions know, why did he not disclose certain meetings. sessions survives this week as attorney general, but chances that he talks about department of justice are pretty minimal at this stage. this will be yet another russian and trump series of questions. >> supposed to talk about budgetary issues. i don't see that happening. >> you and i can agree, that's not going to happen. >> all right. thank you so much. i know you're all going to stick around, we have another conversation coming up in a couple of minutes. new developments, special counsel introduced a new player to help in this russian

investigation. what are the government's top law specialists, more on that, what it means to the probe. and in the second season of united shades of america, exploring the country, various groups and sub cultures. tomorrow night at 10:00 eastern, unlocking myths surrounding puerto ricans, epic journey from new york city to the captivating island itself. >> so puerto ricans are american citizens. >> not by choice. in 1898, the united states invades and claims it as a prize from the spanish american war. >> you believe that puerto rico would be better off if officially a state? >> yes. >> independence hasn't worked, not because we haven't tried but because we have been so repressed. >> puerto ricans can't vote for the president. >> that's true. >> that doesn't make sense, right? >> that doesn't make sense. >> if barack obama would move to

puerto rico, he would lose the right to cast an absentee ballot. >> on the business front, we're limited in growth, even in the poor states, they have income per capita more than twice. >> people of color have always been invisible. >> we are american citizens, yet we don't have the same rights. [boy] cannonball!

[girl] don't... [man] not again! [burke] swan drive. seen it. covered it. we know a thing or two because we've seen a thing or two. ♪ we are farmers. bum-pa-dum, bum-bum-bum-bum ♪

so we're seeing a picture of a new player in the game so to speak in the political world here, talking about michael dreeben, special counsel that bob mueller is enlisting his help in the investigation into possible obstruction of justice and what is happening there. we know that michael dreeben argued more than 100 cases,

expert on obstruction of justice. with that, lynn sweet, what does that say to you about the focus of this investigation now that he has brought michael dreeb dreeben on. >> shows how serious the investigation is, how specific it is gearing towards looking at criminal activity which is not a good sign of any of the named people involved in it, and looks at if it means this might be a very complex investigation where you need somebody to help navigate through many different kinds of issues from potential obstruction of justice on different players to other allegations that could surface as the facts unfold. i caution there's so much we don't know about it. here it is most important to think of this is going to be a sprawling investigation where robert mueller has almost unrestrained resources to hire

consultants, use investigators, and hire outside experts. that's the enormity of this investigation in total, not just it is more than the sum of its parts because there will be so much fire power that can be put together, notwithstanding this one appointment coming early on. >> errol, so much was made about the testimony in anticipation of comey. what happens now in this investigation. when it gets into the hands of the special counsel, kind of goes silent. do you think this is going to quiet down? >> oh no, oh no. there will be sort of a drip, drip, drip of more information that's brought out as the investigation proceeds. i don't think it is in mueller's interest, certainly the fact that you have parallel investigations going on, the house is still looking at some of these russia questions. certainly the senate

intelligence committee is asking for materials that special counsel has or could get access to. going back again to watergate, the fact is when you have multiple parallel investigations going on, they end up sort of working in tandem where information from one can end up in the hands of another or different lines of inquiry, some of the same witnesses, and we have vigorous press coverage of all this. i don't think the story dies down at all. i remind everybody that the clinton white house thought the white water investigation was going to last six months. it ended up lasting more than six years. >> good point and went off the rails so to speak. errol, lynn, thank you for taking time to be with us. always appreciate having your insights. >> thank you. want to tell you an important story. decorated marine found shot in iraq, his death was a suicide, but his family doesn't quite

believe that. >> they're not sure. why they say there was rush to judgment and what the investigation has revealed. so tell us your big idea for getting the whole country booking on choice hotels.com. four words, badda book. badda boom... let it sink in. shouldn't we say we have the lowest price? nope, badda book. badda boom. have you ever stayed with choice hotels? like at a comfort inn? yep. free waffles, can't go wrong. i like it. promote that guy. get the lowest price on our rooms, guaranteed. when you book direct at choicehotels.com. book now.

dreeb en.

stall man has been working to restore her husband's reputation. the medical examiner ruled the colonel's death a suicide. >> with the help of retired jag lawyer, ncis investigators, kim says she has documents that shows critical evidence was overlooked in rush to judgment. the medical examiner needs to be 51% certain to designate a death a suicide. ncis stands by that, saying

defending the reputation would exploit emotions of a widow and dishonor the service member. kim says what they've done failing to reopen his case. let me forewarn you, don't want you caught off guard, there are tough images to watch in this story. >> reporter: colonel michael stallman was one of the highest hanking officers to die in the iraq war, halfway through a yearlong tour of duty found in his bed, gunshot wound to his left temple. >> what specifically did they tell you when they called you that morning to let you know. >> i knew, i'll never forget it. it was is this colonel stallman's wife, i said yes. he said i am calling to inform you that your husband, colonel michael ross stallman was found with self inflicted gunshot wound to the left temple. i'm like he is not left handed. >> reporter: from that first

call, she says she knew something was terribly wrong. u.s. marine corps and ncis concluded it was suicide. kim refused to accept that and is taking on the u.s. military in a personal war seeking justice for her husband. >> right is right and this is not right. and of all people didn't deserve it, mike stallman did not deserve this. >> reporter: michael stallman was a marine's marine, fighter pilot with unwavering loyalty to his country and the mission. kim was 21 when she met him in 1987 two weeks later they were engaged. >> i was one of the lucky ones that ran into that one person in our life that i knew this was the person that i would spend the rest of my life with. >> reporter: michael stallman rose quickly through the ranks, becoming a highly respected jag lawyer. he was getting ready to retire when at age 45 he volunteered to serve in a combat zone. >> i just think that's something

he felt was his duty. he wanted to do it. >> were you worried? >> not at all. that's what's surprising. >> reporter: in january, 2008, colonel stallman left for iraq, joining the rule of law unit, investigating fraud and corruption. both iraqi and american. according to ncis, the day of the shooting, july 31st, stallman woke especially early for his usual pre-dawn running, training for an upcoming triathlon. a month from coming home for r and r to celebrate his daughter's birthday and take an 11-year-old to a water park. he wrote kim, everything is great. just ready for a break and time with you. missing you terribly, need lots of hugs and kisses. love mike. at 4:30 that morning, a colleague tells ncis investigators he saw stallman

who was well liked and that his demeanor appeared to be the same as it always was. computer records show stallman checked on a letter of recommendation he had been writing, also sent what would be his last e-mail. >> what did that e-mail say? >> kim, sorry for what you are about to find out. i love you and always will. you and the girls are the most important thing to me, love mike. that's what it said. >> what did that suggest to you? >> i immediately thought oh no, one of our friends is dead. >> reporter: kim says the message is a common military warning. ncis says it was a suicide note. >> my husband loved life. he basically secured a job, we knew where we wanted to go, everything was planned. >> reporter: stallman was supposed to be leaving on a morning mission when discovered bleeding from a gunshot wound, clinging to life. ncis says heroic efforts to save

him complicated their investigation. he would spend the next two months in a hospital. >> they assumed it was a suicide from day one. >> reporter: retired military jag lawyer worked with stallman, when kim reached out, he agreed to review the case. >> my initial reaction was sort of it is a grieving widow, she doesn't want to accept the truth. >> reporter: as he reviewed the ncis report, his opinion changed. the bullet had fractured his skull, causing multiple traumatic brain injuries. >> when first people responded to mike and found him, the nine millimeter weapon was tucked under his waist of his thigh, hand by his side, the weapon underneath him. >> if you're in a bunk bed with a nine millimeter and you shoot yourself, where is that going to end up? you think it is going to end up in the bed with you?

have you ever shot a nine millimeter? >> reporter: the medic who treated him says his left arm was by his side with the nine millimeter barretta pointing toward his feet. to his right, his military issue bible and key chain with photo of his two young daughters. ncis determined these two items along with the e-mail discovered later indicated suicide. neither the bible nor the key chain were ever fingerprinted. no fingerprints, not even stallmans were found on his pistol, his blood dna was present. his hands were never tested for gunshot residue. ncis saying there was no time because he was immediately med-evac'd. he needed another opinion, reached out to one of ncis' former investigators. >> out of hundreds of cases i've looked at, and others that i've reviewed for families, i've had two that were questionable to me. >> and the death of colonel

stallman is one of them? >> yes, it is. >> reporter: michael maloney reconstructed the crime scene frame by frame. found too many things that forensically didn't add up. >> all these things that we're talking about now are indicative of staging. >> reporter: he says the bullet wound suggests stallman was not laying down as the report concluded but getting up, his head turned away when the fatal shot was fired. >> that puts his head in this position when he received -- >> blood would have gone up. >> reporter: it is called back spatter. the exit wound, blood would have gone into the pillow and mattress where ultimately the bullet would have gone as well. >> do you believe the bullet that caused this hole was the one that caused the fatal shot? >> no, there has to be a second shot fired. >> reporter: ncis confirms mattress and bedding were destroyed as biological hazard

in 48 hours. his helmet bag which he used as a briefcase and carried with him was missing and never recovered. >> that bag turning up, the kind of bag he keeps the most personal, important papers in and documents and that's gone. >> reporter: a photo of the scene taken immediately after shows a white cloth near his bed. appears to have specs of gunshot residue and blood spatter, indication it was close to the gun when fired. >> do you believe that michael stallman was alone in his room when that shot was fired? >> i do not. there would have been someone else present, whether it was an accident, whether it was murder, whether it was negligence, i don't know but there would have been someone else that triggered the weapon that caused that fatal shop. >> reporter: the report suggests his deployment put a strain on the couple's marriage. >> we all grow in our marriage.

sometimes you grow apart. i didn't want that. that's what we were going to work towards. >> reporter: one of the things they said, they reviewed it, there were human factors. >> human factors. that's the best they can come up with. >> reporter: two months after the shooting and one day before their 21st wedding anniversary, colonel michael stallman died. he was buried at arlington national cemetery, eulogized by colleagues in iraq. >> mike never got flustered, and always managed to stay ahead. he was always in control and seemingly couldn't be shaken. it makes what happened in july all the more improbable. >> reporter: the medical examiner concluded in 2008 based on all available investigative information, stallman's death was a suicide. when cnn requested an interview, we were told there was no new information for them to

reconsider otherwise. kim stallman is trying to change the suicide finding. >> the problem with this whole thing is the marine corps passes the buck to ncis, they pass to medical examiner, medical examiner passes back to nci. nobody is responsible. >> do you think he would be in pain to know what you're going through? >> yeah, i do, i do. i think he probably would tell me to just drop it. it doesn't matter, kim. but i can't let it go. i can't. >> kim stallman received full in the line of duty benefits and says this fight is for her husband's honor. >> military families for justice, which investigates questionable military deaths, is helping kim stallman fight the pentagon. >> and north american patriots, which raises money to support

soldiers and marines unfairly charged with crimes unanimously agreed to take up kim stallman's case. cnn newsroom live from washington is next with brianna keilar. >> president trump makes his first comments on the fired fbi director's testimony, accusing him of perjury. that's coming up at the top of the hour. >> make some great memories today. i was thinking around 70. to and before that?re? you mean after that? no, i'm talking before that. do you have things you want to do before you retire? i'd really like to run with the bulls. wow. hope you're fast. i am. get a portfolio that works for you now and as your needs change with investment management services.

i love how usaa gives me the and the security just like the marines did. at one point, i did change to a different company with car insurance, and i was not happy with the customer service. we have switched back over

and we feel like we're back home now. the process through usaa is so effortless, that you feel like you're a part of the family. i love that i can pass the membership to my children, and that they can be protected. we're the williams family, and we're usaa members for life. call usaa today to talk about your insurance needs.

good morning, i am brianna keilar in washington. this morning, president trump is spending the weekend at his new jersey golf club but the big fight, president trump versus james comey goes on. the president is coming back swinging after the former fbi director's mother of all testimonies on capitol hill. here's a listen. >> no collusion, no obstruction. he's a