english just seven years later. today some estimates put the book's total cumulative sales at 500 million copies affirming that the knight achieved the everlasting glory he so desperately thought. thanks to all of you for being part of my program this week. i will see you next week. >> i'm brian stelter and this is reliable sources. how the media really works, how the news gets made. today we have a special program for you. as president trump's war with the media gets even more personal. the president is grappling with senate republicans who missed a self-imposed deadline on health care. he's preparing for a staredown this week with russian president vladimir putin. but on twitter he's wrestling with -- us. look at this video from his twitter account this morning. this is a wwe wrestle mania video from years ago when trump used to show up at wwe events.

you can see that the cnn logo has been superimposed onto the other fighter's face. this showed up on a reddit message board days ago. now it's showing up on the president of the united states' own twitter feed. the early reaction in the last 90 minutes have ranged from this is juvenile, ridiculous, idiotic, or wait no it's just funny. he's just having fun. wait, no it's actually scary, dangerous. we've heard a wide range of reactions to this. and we have a panel standing by. but first cnn's response. the strongest statement i've seen from cnn or any news outlet this year in response to the president's attacks. quote it is a sad day when the president of the united states encourages violence against reporters. cleary sarah huckabee sanders lied when she said the president had never done so. instead of preparing for his overseas trip, his first meeting with vladimir putin, north korea and working on the health care bill he is involved in juvenile behavior far below the dignity of his office.

the statement from cnn saying we will keep doing our jobs. he should start doing his. and this is day six of trump's anti-media tweet storms. we've been covering this all week long. his offensive tweets about joe scarborough and mika brzezinski took up days of news coverage and those came after days of attacks against cnn and "the washington post." now his target on sunday is cnn again. who knows which outlet will be next. who's going to speak out? are other media outlets going to speak up? i think they will today. we've already seen solidarity from journalists on twitter. what about gop leaders? what about republican leaders? i think we should be clear about the trump strategy here. the president's strategy, let's think about this, he's trying to build up news outlets that promote him while trying to tear down outlets that dare to challenge him. he is promoting his friends in the media, talking with friendly interviewers who won't ask him tough questions while he's demeaning voices who criticize him. now don't take my word for it.

take his. at a private fund-raiser this week, trump asked the donors if he should sue cnn. and then he called cnn staffers, quote, horrible human beings. and on saturday he continued his campaign against the broader media. watch. >> the fake media is trying to silence us. but we will not let them. because the people know the truth. the fake media tried to stop us from going to the white house. but i'm president, and they're not. >> is this president trying to impersonate hugo chavez? recep tayyip erdogan? vladimir putin? this is exactly the kind of language that leaders use when they're trying to undermine the press. of course the american press is much more free than reporters in places like russia and turkey and venezuela. on this independence day weekend

that's something we should all be celebrating. so where's paul ryan? where's mitch mcconnell? are gop leaders going to speak up about these attacks against the media? like i said, right now at cnn, earlier it was "the washington post" and the new york times. it's been other networks, it's been other outlets. this president continues to demean the media, are gop leaders going to support him? i want you to know we reached out to the white house earlier this week to invite a spokesperson onto the program given all the president's media attacks. unfortunately they did not respond to our requests. but joining me now is a panel that can examine this from every angle. with me carl bernstein, legendary investigative reporter who broke the watergate story wide open along with bob woodward. he's now a cnn political analyst. kelly mcbride, media ethicist and vice president for the pointer institute david zurawik, olivia from the new york magazine and ben ferguson radio host of the ben ferguson show

and a cnn political commentator. we're having trouble with the live shot. carl we're going to address cnn's error this week, the resignation of three reporters. that is something the president and his aides are now exploiting trying to demean this entire network as fake and fraudulent news. i'd love to hear your reaction to this anti-cnn video from the president this morning? >> first it's not just anti-cnn. it's anti-freedom of the press. it's anti-freedom of speech. it is a definitive statement by the president of the united states. i think it also goes to the question that many military leaders in this questions raised by military leaders in this country now. by the intelligence community. by people in congress, about the stability of the president of the united states. this is an index of his state of mind. visually. it's very disturbing.

there's nothing like light hearted about it whatsoever. it is an incitement. it is definitive, as i say, in the way this president views a free press and its exercise under the first amendment to the constitution. and let me add one thing here about hillary clinton and our coverage of hillary clinton and her server, that donald trump and his people thought at the time was an example of great news by the same news institutions that he is now calling fake news. when it suits him, it's great news. when it doesn't, it's fake news. and the nexus of fake news in america is the trump white house. >> i'm glad we have an hour because we're going to unpack everything you just said. i want to ask about one detail in the cnn statement, olivia, you are a working reporter in washington every day, so you see some of the hate mail, some of

the threats that reporters get. did you interpret cnn's statement to say this video enkourages violence? would you agree with that that this video actually encourages violence? >> i don't know if that was certainly donald trump's intention. but it doesn't matter right? what matters is what the effect is. and i think there's certainly a chance that someone who docould look at that tweet and say this is what the president wants us to do and we have to be concerned about that. i think this has happened a number of times where it goes from reddit to one of donald trump's aides and then to donald trump's twitter account. >> can you tell us about that? for viewers who don't know what reddit is, tell us about that. >> i don't recommend it. but reddit is, you know, a message board where people can talk and post all sorts of things. and it's sort of very free wheeling. and donald trump is very popular on reddit during the campaign. there were all sorts of different threads where he was popular on reddit and this happened repeatedly. where something might go from info wars to reddit, and then go

to what is presumably donald trump's aides who talk to him, and then it went to donald trump's twitter account. it's just not something we're used to seeing come from the president of the united states. but it is something that we've seen repeatedly throughout donald trump's young political career. >> right. ben ferguson i mentioned he's on the phone with us, conservative talk show host and cnn commentator. ben i'm curious from your perspective do you have a message for the president about sharing a video like this? >> look, i think we got to put it in perspective. this has been going around on twitter. i think when i saw it, i eventually laughed at it because i thought it was actually one of the more humorous moments of the real fighting back and forth that the president has had with the media. i don't think it incites violence. i think people are stretching when they imply that. wrestling is fake. everybody knows that wrestling is fake. this was something that you just need to have just an ounce of humor, and just kind of look at this and say, this may actually

be a little bit of a funny moment for this. you could look at it and say it's clever -- >> you can say wrestling is fake. security threats are real. and ben you suffer from this just like the rest of us do. you get hate mail that sometimes threatens your life. and that's what's happening to folks at cnn right now. i've seen some of the trash that's coming to people's inboxes. how can we look at this video and not think that it's actually going to cause even more of those threats more of that hate to fester out there? >> look, i think you obviously have reached a intense moment between the president, and the media, where he feels like there are people out there in the media that they're entire day is surrounded by trying to go after the president, and turning stories into bigger news than it maybe really is. and that's one of the things that we saw this last week that he's trying to capitalize on. he's trying to make it abundantly clear that there are people in the media who have made it their personal mission and their job to destroy this president. and when you look at something like that he just tweeted out, and we try to turn this in to a

bigger story, as if he's inciting violence, which is just not the reality -- >> who's turning it into a bigger story, ben? this is what the president of the united states decided to post today. he could have posted about health care. he could have responded to criticisms -- >> you're playing into the exact point that i'm making here and the point that i'm making is, you're over -- i think everyone's trying to overmake this into too big of a deal, overexaggerate this. it took me three seconds to retweet that tweet earlier saying we're going to talk about it this morning. i'm sure the president saw it and thought it was pretty funny and said i'm going to retweet this. it took him seven seconds. it didn't take him 72 hours or 24 dhours -- >> no i agree with you on that. he's a busy man. he's not just tweeting all day. but what he does for seven seconds with hurt people. david zurawik, the president's acting strong and that's what his supporters on reddit are saying, this is a show of strength. i would argue it's an admission of weakness. the campaign against the media

is sort of all he has. zurawik, your reaction? >> well, look, first i want to say i couldn't disagree more with ben. and i think the most dangerous thing is to say oh, have a sense of humor, let's just laugh at it. you can kill somebody in seven seconds. that's part of the problem with social media. is people don't think about what they say. and they put out hateful, nasty stuff like this. listen, i wrote this this week. i really believe this. twitter was a great tool for somebody outside of the power -- somebody campaigning. it's great for people who are protesting, people outside the castle. it's a great attack vehicle. but now that he's inside the castle, and he's the guy running it, he doesn't know how to control that voice anymore. it's like the god gave him the gift of fire to vanquish all his opponents in the republican primary. it was a 24/7 kind of attack ad that costs you nothing. it will revolutionize campaigning i'm sure. but now, what it's giving us is

exactly what you said at the top, it's giving us a glimpse into his mind with these tweets like the ones against mika brzezinski and this, and it's a really disturbing look at the man running the country. look you take somebody, you slam them physically to the ground, you put a logo on identifying them, that's what fascists did in the '30s to people. this is not something, ben that you laugh about and say oh, ho ho it's only 7 seconds what a funny thing, get a sense of humor, yuck it up -- >> you're not saying anywhere near fascism, are you? >> with all due respect as a media critic have you ever had this type of intensity towards it people that, great example, "saturday night live" or would you say that that's humor and funny? >> i denounce barack obama when he cut -- tried to cut fox from the herd and say i'm going to define what a legitimate news organization is. ask brian i was on this show with the same intensity.

this is about what carl bernstein's talking about. this is about our constitutional government, it's about the high end of the press, which trump doesn't und stand. he knows the bottom feeders in the tabloid world. that's the kind of people he knows. people who can be bought and sold. people who can be scared. if he thinks "the new york times" or "the washington post" or cnn is going to be scared by him, he is in for the rudest awakening -- >> so let's be clear about this. what you're saying is that anyone else out there that wants to be funny, "saturday night live," come seedians, people that mock him on tv, that is acceptable, but for the president to have a little bit of a sense of humor this morning, and to actually put out a video that he was in with fake wrestling, you're now saying it's fascism. >> no, not true. ben when kathy griffin did something physically that would possibly incite violence against the president, we all denounced her. this is the same -- >> -- condemnation -- >> -- one second. >> i want to interject here.

this is about the president of the united states rejecting what reporters do. which is to report and try to get the best obtainable version of the truth. this is that function that has terrified this president from the beginning. it is that function that has turned him into the -- this kind of bully as other people have noted. he is -- he is going to the question of what we do at the heart of our business, which is to report. he does not want us to report. he wants us to be lap dogs. he wants us to be, as he had early in this campaign, very pliant toward what he is saying and toward his sensationalism and toward his manufactured controversy, instead of the best obtainable version of the truth. that's what all of this is about. and we need to return to our reporting -- >> carl, with all due respect -- >> can i finish price? can i just finish? >> we have to be intellectually

honest here and look at the reality that there is a significant percentage of the media, especially in washington, d.c., that have a genuine disdain and hatred for the president of the united states of america. and what you're saying is that you -- the president does not expect them to be his lap dogs. he just is asking for them to at least be fair in their coverage. and there are a lot of people in the media that are not. they go out, with the intent to do everything they can to undermine and take down this white house. >> all right, ben -- >> let me say one thing -- >> -- break but let me add this thing and get kelly mcbride in here. we're talking about the media very broadly. it includes reporters and it also includes commentators. >> exactly. >> and i think there's a lot of commentators who are very disturbed by the president, some of whom may go overboard sometimes. but i think carl your point is on the reporting front, we need to continue to do the reporting jobs, yes, commentators might go overboard. kelly i really want to hear from you, kelly mcbride, of the pointer institute, how do you

think journalists should be covering this kind of anti-cnn tweet if at all? >> well -- well i honestly think that we're probably spending a little too much time on it here. >> okay. >> no offense. >> that's why i asked. >> and, frankly, it just came out, and so, right, this has like in the last 30 minutes or 45 minutes. so it's not completely inappropriate. but, i mean, yes, if a reporter did this, a reporter would be fired. right? and so, i don't think we have to debate whether it's appropriate or what the president's state of mind was. whether he was trying to make a joke, or whether he's trying to be intentional. i think what we have to do as journalists is focus on the stories that need our attention. what's going on with the health care act. what's going on with our taxes. what's going on with trade, what's going on with climate change. and how are federal policies that the president is enacting or not enacting affecting those issues. and i worry that when we get --

i'm completely offended by this clip. and i also think it's kind of ironic, because i believe that this clip or one very similar to it is part of the documentary that just came out last week called nobody speaks which is about the threat to the free press -- >> great -- >> that many forces -- >> yeah. and so i think that there's a certain amount of irony here. but when we get distracted by this, and we get too emotional, and we take our eye off our jobs then we're not serving our audience, either. and so -- >> -- to explain why we do what we do. and these kinds of messages have a corrosive effect on a big portion of the country. >> absolutely. absolutely. and we can do that. we can do that in a way that we can be heard now. and i worry that the way you guys are yelling at each other, nobody's listening to you. >> then let's make sure we don't speak over each other. let's get ben's video up. we're trying to get ben on

camera. we're going to keep everybody around here. take a break and reset because there's a lot more to discuss, including cnn's retraction and resignations of three staffers. is the press giving the president ammunition for his war? we're also going to discuss joe scarborough, mika brzezinski and the national enquirer. what is that about? new answers right after the break. lobster and shrimp are teaming up in so many new dishes. like coastal lobster and shrimp, with shrimp crusted with kettle chips. or new, over-the-top lobster and shrimp overboard. but it can't last, so hurry in. i doni refuse to lie down. why suffer? stand up to chronic migraine with botox® botox® is the only treatment for chronic migraine shown to actually prevent headaches and migraines before they even start. botox® is for adults with chronic migraine, 15 or more headache days a month each lasting 4 hours or more. it's injected by a doctor once every 12 weeks. and is covered by most insurance. effects of botox® may spread hours to weeks after injection, causing serious symptoms.

alert your doctor right away as difficulty swallowing, speaking, breathing, eye problems, or muscle weakness can be signs of a life-threatening condition. side effects may include allergic reactions, neck and injection site pain, fatigue, and headache. don't take botox® if there's a skin infection. tell your doctor your medical history, muscle or nerve conditions, and medications, including botulinum toxins, as these may increase the risk of serious side effects. for a limited time, you can qualify for two treatments at no cost. stand up to chronic migraine. talk to a headache specialist today.

with my moderate to severe crohn's disease,... ...i kept looking for ways to manage my symptoms. i thought i was doing okay... then it hit me... ...managing was all i was doing. when i told my doctor,... ...i learned humira is for people who still have symptoms of moderate to severe crohn's disease... ...even after trying other medications. in clinical studies,... the majority of people on humira... saw significant symptom relief... ...and many achieved remission. humira can lower your ability... ...to fight infections, including tuberculosis. serious, sometimes fatal infections and cancers, including lymphoma, have happened;... ...as have blood, liver, and nervous system problems, serious allergic reactions, and new or worsening heart failure. before treatment, get tested for tb. tell your doctor if you've been to areas where...

...certain fungal infections are common, and if you've had tb,... ...hepatitis b, are prone to infections,... ...or have flu-like symptoms or sores. don't start humira if you have an infection. just managing your symptoms? ask your gastroenterologist about humira. with humira, remission is possible. ...that had the power to whawaken something old...... ...or painfully dated... ...or something you simply thought was lost forever... ...because it could form a strong bond, regardless of age... if a paint could give any time-worn surface stunning new life... ...you have to wonder... is it still paint? regal select exterior from benjamin moore®. only available at independently owned paint and hardware stores.

president trump seems to think he has a lot of enemies in the media. but he also has a lot of powerful friends. most of america is familiar with one of them, steve bannon. he ran breitbart and now of course he's one of the president's top strategists. but trump's powerful media network is much bigger than ben. let's take a look at the pro-trump media universe. it includes rupert murdoch and fox news not to mention sean hannity and the cast of fox and friends, then there's news max and info wars, radio hosts like rush limbaugh, breitbart and the drudge report and the national enquirer. yes if you look at the enquirer recently you can tell when you're checking out at the supermarket that it's become pretty pro-trump. the enquirer made news, when joe scarborough and mika brzezinski claimed the white house used the threat of a damaging national enquirer story to try to affect

and influence their coverage. trump denied this but scarborough said he has receipts. he says he has text messages proving that there were communications between trump aides and scarborough. essentially what scarborough says happened is they keep reaching out to him and saying if you call up the president and apologize, the enquirer won't be mean to you. we'll get the piece to go away. some analysts said that sounds a lot like black mail. now trump said actually it was scarborough calling me trying to stop the story and i said no. either way, both men seem to be confirming that trump has weaponized the national enquirer. back with me now the panel, carl bernstein, kelly mcbride, olivia nuzzi and ben ferguson. i'm told scarborough doesn't want to show these text messages because he uses these people as sources, anonymous sources. he doesn't want to burn them. i think it would help to have some evidence to back up his assertion. what do you make of this idea the president could be using his friends in the media to try to

silence his opponents. >> yeah, when -- when scarborough and mika talked about that on friday -- first of all i thought they responded with restraint and kind of power and authority to those horrible tweets that trump wrote about mika brzezinski. and you know when we say we should all be covering the stories that are important, we shouldn't be focusing on this. listen we should be focusing on a president who says such things about women. it's a role model that's destructive to this country and we should be passionate about it. we should not just say oh, calm down. so that's part of it. the power of their friday morning statement and i watched it twice. i watched it live and i watched the replay it was so compelling to me, was this thing about the national enquirer. and you know what? really, that's what i was saying earlier about the bottom feeding end of journalism, if you even want to call it journalism. i think this is the tabloid

world donald trump knew from his disco days and from getting in the celebrity columns. it's like walter winchell era. i think, unfortunately, that's what he thinks the press is. he doesn't know about the high end of the press that carl bernstein represents. and i think, listen, if joe scarborough did put his hand in this, and say we've got it, i think at some point, there's some pressure on him to show some evidence, because trump will keep saying like, fake news, blah, blah, blah. i believe -- i mean, you know, give me between mika and joe and trump i'm going with mika and joe. but, this is a case now where if that's true, that's horrible. and brian you know everybody on this panel knows how this stuff is done. it's a kind of wink and nod and informal thing. maybe jared kushner said just call the president up and make this thing go away -- >> have a better idea for a story for you. >> yes, yes, yes.

and that's really -- that's sick. that's everything that i am against as a journalist. that you could have those kind of conversations, but i think that's the world trump knows. and i think, you know -- >> yeah. >> kelly, i want to get your sense, ethical expert on this sort of thing. you're here in florida, the enquirer is based in florida. what is your sense of this allegation from scarborough and brzezinski? >> well, i think it shows us something about the president. that if this is true, that he was trying to basically manipulate joe scarborough into calling up the president and begging for forgiveness, and saying that he didn't mean it, it's interesting that the president or that his representatives would spend time and energy on this issue. i get why the president attacks "the new york times" and cnn and buzzfeed. because those are all

organizations that produce real reporting that -- that -- that counters the president's narrative. now, joe and mika, they don't actually do any original reporting. they facilitate a political conversation, and they used to be friends, or supporters of the president, or certainly more friendly to him, than they are now. and it's sort of gives us an insight in to the president and what he is spending his time and energy on. and that's what i find most alarming about it. >> i think that's a key point. i think it raises the other question, what would happen if he didn't have all these media allies. what if he didn't have fox news to constantly support his point of view. interesting to imagine what that role would be like without the enquirer and those outlets. let's take a break here. much more to discuss on the other side. we're going to have a great conversation about cnn's error. it's self-inflicted wound and the resignation of three veteran journalists.

...it starts a chain reaction... ...that's heard throughout the connected business world. at&t network security helps protect business, from the largest financial markets to the smallest transactions, by sensing cyber-attacks in near real time and automatically deploying countermeasures. keeping the world of business connected and protected. that's the power of and. the average family's its raised 1 dare devil, 2 dynamic diy duos, and an entrepreneur named sharon. its witnessed 31 crashes, 4 food fights, and the flood of '09. it's your paradise perfected with behr premium plus low odor paint. the best you can buy starting under $25. unbelievable quality. unbeatable prices. right now get incredible savings on behr's top-rated paints and stains. only at the home depot. is to always keep track of your employees.r

micromanage them. make sure they're producing. woo! employee of the month! you really shouldn't leave their side. vita coco coconut water, hydration comes naturally. introducing the new sleep number 360™ smart bed. the only bed smart enough to change sleep as we know it. it senses your every move and automatically adjusts on both sides to keep you comfortable. and snoring.... does your bed do that? right now save on sleep number 360™ smart beds. plus, it's the lowest prices of the season with savings of $500 on our most popular p5 bed. ends sunday. problem is, you'reith neterrible with names.

okay, this is the boss. you got this. anna!...yes! new clients? we've been there. and with breakfast on the run, we'll be there for you. book direct for a guaranteed discount. hampton by hilton.

the future isn't silver suits anit's right now.s, think about it. we can push buttons and make cars appear out of thin air. find love anywhere. he's cute. and buy things from, well, everywhere. how? because our phones have evolved. so isn't it time our networks did too? introducing america's largest, most reliable 4g lte combined with the most wifi hotspots. it's a new kind of network. xfinity mobile.

welcome back to "reliable sources." it's been a difficult and embarrassing week for cnn. three journalists resigned from this organization after the publication of a russia related article was retracted. it was retracted because the story did not go through the proper review channels. normally a story that has anonymous sources that's sensitive like that is read by multiple units within the company, including legal experts, and standards experts before it's published. this story was not ready for publication. so it was taken down, and there was an apology to the trump ally anthony scaramucci who was name in the story. now we saw the resignations on monday. they were a shock and they saddened many journalists inside cnn, including some people who think the network went too far, actually did too much. but the bottom line is that news outlets like cnn have very high standards for journalism. now, as the head much this network jeff zucker oftentimes

says on editorial cause, we have to play error free ball. now, in this case, we saw the trump administration make the most out of this error. and try to exploit it if we're being frank about it. the president's sons and the president himself weighed in on twitter. also this week another news outlet had to retract a story that was vice news. it was a story about trump and disney world. not a big story. not a bombshell. but one that had errors and had to be retracted. let's discuss this with our panel and examine what went wrong here beginning with carl bernstein. carl, of course, you worked with cnn now, but i love your honest sense of what happened here. what went wrong? >> well, first, institutions that are enemies of the people do not make a priority of correcting their mistakes, calling attention to their mistakes, and leaving from their ranks by order of the management those who made the mistakes. that's what cnn did in this

instance, because there is a protocol in place to make sure that such mistakes don't happen. and instead of welcoming this the president of the united states ridiculed, attacked cnn, said this was evidence of fake news, when in fact it is evidence -- >> you're making this about trump, though. cnn reporters made a big mistake, didn't they? >> yes. they -- cnn made a mistake. acknowledged it. corrected it. made a prominent correction and also said, we have a protocol in which we expect our reporters and editors to follow this procedure, they were not followed in this instance. and that is a statement of commitment to the best obtainable version of the truth, which ought to be welcomed by all in business, and by those in the white house, is what i'm saying here. >> yeah. let me ask olivia, washington correspondent for the new york

magazine was the white house trying to use this honest mistake to try to smear all real russia reporting? >> oh, certainly. that was evident in the briefing with sarah huckabee sanders the deputy press secretary this week. i think what the white house is hoping is that because of this one honest mistake, which was obviously responded to in a professional manner, they overreacted to according to some people, they're hoping that they can dismiss all russia reporting. but this is very obviously not about being truthful or being accurate. because if it were, why did the president still be citing fox news all the time when fox news recently had to retract their own story about the seth rich scandal or conspiracy. i think if that were the case, if this really was about how they valued truth and they value accurate reporting, the president wouldn't be tweeting fox news reports at all hours of the day. >> kelly mcbride, poynter institute, what needs to be learned from this error by cnn? >> well, you know, one thing

that cnn didn't do, and we criticized fox also in the same way, around the seth rich story, is they didn't say exactly what was wrong with the story. they didn't provide details. they took it down, and they said we can't stand by the reporting, because it didn't hold up to our standards. which is exactly the same thing fox did around the seth rich story. but then, they also said what those standards were. so cnn went a little bit further. now, the consequence of this is that everybody who read that story now, or any other journalist who might report on that story is going to run into the same thing that you're running into right now at cnn. which is the president and all of his supporters will just dismiss it as already proven to be a false story. when we don't know that the story itself was false. what we know, based on the retraction, is that the methods of reporting the story, relying on a single anonymous sort,

didn't stand up to cnn's standards. and so really cnn now has the obligation to advance the story and get what is accurate on the record, and if there was something that was truly inaccurate in that story, rather than just not up to the reporting standards, you got to come out and say that. >> you're saying that the solution, the antidote to bad reporting is more reporting. my mentor david carr used to say that, do more reporting if there's an error. let me ask ben ferguson who is on the phone with us, conservative radio host. we're trying to get his camera working there in dallas. i think you're still on the phone, right? >> yeah. >> okay so this week as you know there's this conservative pro-dock tour posting anti-cnn videos. maybe trying to take advantage of the retraction, but he's been posting anti-cnn videos, showing cnn staffers like a producer in atlanta, raising doubts about russia related reporting at the network. these are the opinions of personnel. the opinions of person of staffers at the network.

do you think it's appropriate with a guy to be with an undercover camera, walking up to staffers trying to take advantage them and embarrass the network you're working for? >> i don't think it's taking advantage of anybody. if you walk up to somebody and get their honest opinion and then they give you something else when they're doing their job i think that's actually showing somebody that's being dishonest. i think you should say the same thing that you would say on air that you would say off the air. i think that this also plays in to -- >> but the company that's 4,000 employees, does it matter what one junior staffer says? >> well, i think the argument could be the junior staffer obviously has a lot of control over what's going to be put on the air. and so the argument would be made -- >> that's a junior staffer, ben, junior. >> well, i mean, junior staffer that works on a show. does he have a say-so? does he have something to say on that show? does he help with the planning of that show? that all plays into the narrative that the president has made it very clear that he feels like that there is an attack on

him consistently and constaptly. now, do i think that those staffers should have said what they said? look, that's their decision. they're grown adults, and they shouldn't have put it out there in that way. i don't think. i think it makes it look like that it's some sort of dog and pony show for some of them. and that's something that i do think is an issue. but ultimately, i don't think that that should indict every single person in a newsroom at the same time. i do think that when you are feel like you're under attack you're going to use that and make it as an example of this is what i'm having to deal with. that's obviously the point that the white house and the president is trying to make. do i think that's indicative of everyone i work with at cnn, of course not. there are people that genuinely want to get a solid, hard news story out there. but when you combine that and the story being retracted it plays exactly in to i think the -- what makes the president upset, and what he says and he says finally, here is the proof, i told you that they're out to get me, look at what these people are saying. >> i still think it's dishonest to cherry pick like that when

you've got this giant tree and you pick off three little pieces and try to smear an entire industry with those pieces. le. >> but, look, i don't think it's cherry picking. i think when you go out there -- >> but it absolutely is cherry picking -- we know it's cherry picking. >> the only person that you can blame for the people that said these things are the people that said these things. i don't think -- >> sure. people need to be responsible, no matter where they work and i agree with you on that. bottom line journalists have to play error free ball. the head of cnn saying that. let's take a break again. everyone staying with us after this commercial break the conversation about press access the white house briefings and more. we'll discuss the issues of cameras at the briefings, broader accessibility of the president and his aides. including and also other branches of government. we'll be back in just a moment. it's ok that everybody ignores me when i drive. it's fine. because i get a safe driving bonus check every six months i'm accident free. because i don't use my cellphone when i'm driving. even though my family does, and leaves me all alone.

here's something else... i don't share it with mom. i don't. right, mom? i have a brand new putter you don't even know about! it's awesome. safe driving bonus checks, only from allstate. sometimes i leave the seat up on purpose. switching to allstate is worth it.

what in real time?stomer insights from the data wait, our data center and our clouds can't connect? michael, can we get this data to...? look at me...look at me... look at me... you used to be the "yes" guy. what happened to that guy? legacy technology can handcuff any company. but "yes" is here. so, you're saying we can cut delivery time? yeah. with help from hpe, we can finally work the way we want to. with the right mix of hybrid it, everything computes.

welcome back. as you look at the dwindling number of oncamera briefings at

the white house it's no wonder reporters are feeling frustrated. the stats from june, seven on camera briefings, twelve off camera and on weekdays without any briefings at all. let's keep in mind the president had his first rnc fund-raiser earlier this week. the press was not allowed inside. however the audio leaked pretty quickly. olivi olivia, what's the big fuss here is this normal this idea that the briefings are only going to be held on camera when the white house thinks it's an advantage to? >> well, that seems to be the case, right? this week one of the only on camera briefings was when sarah huckabee sanders used it to attack cnn, and specifically russia reporting. i think there was a reason why we were all assembled there and why the cameras were there. it was very transparent at the time. and you're right, we were not allowed to watch donald trump's fund-raiser at his hotel this week. had to assemble with a bunch of

other reporters yo the side in the lobby of the hotel. i hope it's not the new normal. i think we need an opportunity to question the white house officials on the record, on camera, to hold them accountable. even a lot of people saying the briefing is useless. we don't get any answers from it. i completely disagree. i think any opportunity to question this white house on the record, on camera, we need to take. but i will say, you know, there's been a lot of people saying we'll just turn the cameras on. or is this really -- >> right. >> i don't know that i think that's necessarily the right way to go. i don't think that we should respond to the white house's lack of rules, or remaking of the rules and ordering us around and breaking with protocol by breaking our own protocol. >> -- what do you think -- sorry go ahead. >> i just don't know if that would result in more transparency in the end which is what i think we need to be doing in the long-term, trying to have more transparency. i would also point out somebody said on this panel earlier that we need to be focusing less on this kind of stuff. we need to be focusing on the big picture stuff, on health

care. this is the biggest story in the world. the fact that the white house is attacking the media like this in these terms, in violent terms, it may seem silly when you watch that gif that trump tweeted earlier, that video that he tweeted earlier but that's always the case with trump, it's a little bit silly but also potentially really damaging. and i think we need to take it very seriously and pay as much attention to it as possible. >> anti-media attacks, and lack of press access are related as part of the same story. so zurawik we see the door being closed on the press. the secretary of defense travel this week without the usual contingent of reporters. should the press be fighting back? >> brian, that's absolutely it. that's the largest story here is secrecy. government behind closed doors. the white house press briefings are part of that. but that's what's really alarmed me in the last few weeks. you know, we had this senate version of a health care bill come out of this -- this little secret group. it wasn't even all republican senators, just these few.

when sessions was testifying before the senate intelligence committee all of a sudden that day, you couldn't interview senators over in the hall. that kind of stuff is a creeping kind of secrecy, secret government that trump -- and that's what this fight in the press room is about. look the -- and olivia's right, the one day that they do let the cameras in this week it goes from a breitbart question to set up huckabee sanders on cnn. she takes it and then she uses the pulpit of the white house press room to tell people to go look at a tape by james o'keefe, a propagandist, a guy who pled guilty to coming in to landrieu's office in new orleans to get information illegally. a person who misrepresents him in run and gun secret hidden camera interviews and she says i don't know if it's true or not. >> but the president will stair it on instagram. we'll have final thoughts from

our panel right after this quick commercial break. snoov crunchy outside. chewy inside. tum tum tum tum new tums chewy bites. lobster and shrimp are teaming up in so many new dishes.fest, like coastal lobster and shrimp, with shrimp crusted with kettle chips. or new, over-the-top lobster and shrimp overboard. but it can't last, so hurry in. briathe customer app willw if be live monday. can we at least analyze customer traffic? can we push the offer online? brian, i just had a quick question. brian? brian... legacy technology can handcuff any company. but "yes" is here. you're saying the new app will go live monday?! yeah. with help from hpe, we can finally work the way we want to. with the right mix of hybrid it, everything computes.

about to see progressive's new home quote explorer. where you can compare multiple quote options online and choose what's right for you. woah. flo and jamie here to see hqx. flo and jamie request entry. slovakia. triceratops. tapioca. racquetball. staccato. me llamo jamie. pumpernickel. pudding. employee: hey, guys! home quote explorer. it's home insurance made easy. password was "hey guys." it's home insurance made easy. is to always keep track of your employees.r micromanage them. make sure they're producing. woo! employee of the month! you really shouldn't leave their side. vita coco coconut water, hydration comes naturally.

...where each drop was formulated to be smarter.... ...even smarter than that... ...so if a color didn't go on evenly, it would balance itself out to reveal its truest, richest state. if a paint could realize the fullest potential of any color... ...you have to wonder... is it still paint? aura interior from benjamin moo®e . only available at independently owned paint and hardware stores.

we're back now, final thoughts with our panel. talking with carl bernstein, we're talking about media mistakes, high standards versus low standards, even if the president has low standards, journalists must keep high, high standards. >> and our job is to do the reporting. what we saw from the president of the united states today is a definitive statement of his sensibility and mindset that should be disturbing to every american, democrat, republican, liberal, conservative, people who supported him, people who voted against him. it is a very disturbing statement that tweet and video today. and at the same time, we in the press, we can't do too much

navel gazing. i don't think that's what we're doing, but in terms of getting into what we do in the press room, in the white house and whether the cameras are turned off for this or that is not the important thing. we need to get out there and do the reporting on the president's policies, on russia, on the president's investigations, on his character, on his stability, all of these are part of the same story, the character, capabilities, policies of this presidency of the united states and a president as it seems, as i said the other day, to be a malignant presidency which ra e raises questions on how we cover this unique power and this yu unique presidency. >> kelly, who have you seen in the press doing this right and

how are you concerned about being done wrong? especially with regards to the president's emotional stability. that gets thrown around on talk shows, not by reporters necessarily, but definitely by commentators. i wanted kelly mcbride to weigh in there. >> please, let somebody else. >> so the tone is the tone, right? like we have a cartoonish president and the we have the press reacting to his behavior. and if we're waiting for someone to take the moral high ground here, that's not going to happen in this current media ecosystem, because what we have created, where we used to have a media ecosystem that was based on more facts and fewer opinions, we have reversed that in the last ten years, we have way more opinions out there and the more bombastic the president becomes, the more bombastic the press is going to become and i don't

think it's going to change. >> so you're saying it's a dysfunctional relationship or a vicious cycle? >> i'm sorry, i didn't catch that. >> you're describing a disfunctional relationship where both sides are making things worse. how do you react to that? is this a vicious cycle between trump and the press? a war on both sides? >> i think that's too broad a generalization, brian, some people are doing exceptional work in fighting this battle every day, you have reported it on this show, the "new york times"/"washington post" slugfest on who can do the best work is wonderful for journalism. it's a blessing to be able to watch journalism operate at that level in this. cnn has been really fighting it and msnbc is doing more reporting. even jim acosta, the chief white house correspondent for you guys, every day, he battles in that press room for access, and

i tell you what, it's not fun. you all know it's nice when the beat goes nice and when you're fighting this way for every inch, it's brutal. i really admire what he's trying to do saying don't let this secrecy be the new normal, push back. as lydia said, it's very complicated how you push back. and i'll give her that. >> olivia, let's go back to we started this hour with this new video from the president. again, this is the president of the united states boasting a world wrestling video showing him knocking down and punching a guy with a cnn logo on his face. so he's talking about violence against cnn, he's not saying go out and beat someone up, but he's publishing this video that models the behavior. i asked twitter's pr, is this a violation of twitter's terms of service? but keep in mind, terms of

service, they do for bid inci incitement to violence or harassment. is it possible to still be shocked by the president's tweets? >> i was a little surprised this morning. but i just would point out that donald trump is being held to a much lower standard for some reason that the media is. i disagree that there are fewer facts now and more opinion, i think people are doing the best reporting than we have seen in years, i think we just have more people in general talking on the television than we have in the past, but reporting right now is great in general. but we have never been in a time like this in american history before where the press is being held to a higher standard for their own rhetoric than the president of the united states is. that is the biggest story in the world right now and we need to talk about it as much as possible. the thing about donald trump is so much of what he says is

ridiculous, that the president of the united states would share something like this. but it's also very serious, and i think we need to hold the two thoughts in our hands at once, and admit that it's really funny on the one hand, but it's disturbing, and it's really disturbing things in terms of where we are headed in terms of our first amendment protection. >> there are concerns about threats, death threats, violence before today, do you think those concerns are now magnified by this new video. even if some people think it's funny, it is being taken very seriously. we're going to keep asking that question, whether it violates the terms of service, if you read the terms of service, it does. thank you all for being here, i'm sorry we couldn't get you on camera, but we appreciate everybody being here for this special edition of this program. we're talking about this anti-cnn video from the president. and the rest of our coverage,

including a threat against al jazeera. we're going to have all of these topics and much more, a free newsletter at reliablesources.com. have a nice weekend and we'll see you back here next week. health care hit. the senate could not get a plan passed before the fourth of july. >> if we don't get it done, it's just going to be something we're not going to like. >> so now the president's proposing repealing obama care now and replacing out later, and he's working on the new strategy with one of his frequent crit s critics. >> we need repeal, we need replace, trying to do them together has essential seemed to work. and dat