issues so i'm sure they would find something else to argue about. with this case, it might solve this issue. >> although maybe they agree on this. maybe neither one want the dna test. >> that might be a first. >> all right, thank you very much, jason carroll. and thanks so much to all of you as always for joining us. "ac 360" with anderson starts now. good evening. two huge developments happening late this afternoon. both with potentially significant consequences. first on taxes, a victory for the white house. a sweeping senate bill cleared the first big hurdle thanks in part to deal making from a president who campaigned on his ability to do just that. at the same time, mixed with the thing he's become known for, name calling. and nearly the exact same time that was happening in washington, word came that north korea tested what appears to be an intercontinental ballistic missile which experts say could have the capability of hitting not just hawaii but the u.s. mainland, possibly even the east coast. the rhetoric has ramped up to the point where one u.s. senator

said, quote, we're heading for war if things don't change. we begin right now with cnn's jim acosta at the white house. first, let's talk about how the president responded to the news of this launch. >> anderson, he was much tougher on democrats today than he was on jim jong-un. no talk of fire and fury. no talk of little rocket man earlier today, but the president dill tell reporters who were gathered here at the white house earlier today that he's on top of the situation in north korea. here's what he had to say. >> as you probably have heard and some of you have reported, a missile was launched a little while ago from north korea. i will only tell you that we will take care of it. we have general mattis in the room with us. and we have had a long discussion on it. it is a situation that we will handle. >> now, the white house says as of this evening, the president has spoken with the leaders of japan and south korea, but anderson, absent from the president's comments from today

was really any of the brinkmanship we have seen all year long with respect to kim jong-un, which is an interesting development. we'll have to see if that continues to be the case at the white house because obviously that's raised a lot of concerns across washington as to whether the president should be engaging in that kind of brinkmanship, getting into name calling like he does with elizabeth warren and chuck schumer when this person has their hands on the nuclear weapons. >> it's a test for the president coming not long after listing north korea as a state swaupons of terrorism. >> not only did he decide the change the policy, the bush administration before barack obama took north korea off the list of state sponsors of terrorism, as we know. in addition to that, anderson, keep in mind, he just came off a nearly two-week foreign trip during which he softened his rhetoric on china with the intent of using china to have some kind of leverage over north korea. that has been his policy

throughout this entire administration, ten months of it so far. so far, it has not yielded results. he's tried everything from using china, even talked about using russia during this foreign trip. and he's also obviously raised ratcheted up the rhetoric on north korea as well. none of those things have really had the intended effect of de-escalating the situation with north korea. which is why it's no surprise you heard lindsey graham earlier tonight saying on cnn that perhaps it might take military force to change the situation over in north korea. if that is the situation we're heading towards, that will obviously be a critical moment for this presidency and obviously for the entire world. >> jim acosta, appreciate that. the president says we'll take care of it. clearly tonight, whatever that entails just got more complicated. kim jong-un's engineers are on a learning curve. jim sciutto joins us with more

on that and where this all appears to be leading. hots the latest, jim? >> what's key about this test, the highest altitude test north korea has ever conducted. it went 2700 miles directly up into space, and then back down to earth. that is more than ten times the altitude, for instance, of the international space station. why is that important? because that is the arc, the flight path consistent with an intercontinental ballistic missile, a mistal that can go from north korea to, for instance, the united states. and it also fits with a pace that we have seen this year of north korean missile testing that we have never seen before. this is the 23rd missile test that north korea has conducted since donald trump was elected president. we have never seen that before. and with each test, they are learning more, getting closer to being able to threaten the united states. >> so is it the view of the pentagon that right now north korea does have a missile capable of hitting the u.s. mainland? >> what north korea has not yet

demonstrated in a test is the capability to bring a pay load, in effect, a nuclear warhead back into the atmosphere. they haven't done that yet, but each of these tests brings them closer to doing that. and for months, the view of the u.s. intel community has been this, that we have to assume as a country for national security purposes that north korea has an untested capability of doing that. and that's about posture, that you have to be prepared for that possibility and really that is a game changer because as you know, anderson, we have talked about this before, that multiple administrations, democrat and republican, obama, bush, going back to clinton, have all said this is a possibility they would never allow to happen. and we are this close to that being the reality. it's just an alarming reality today. >> yeah. jim sciutto, appreciate that. >> more now on how south korea and the region are reacting. new developments on that front tonight as well. will ripley has just spoking to a north korean official.

he joins us now. what did the north korean official tell you? >> well, basically what jim said, that north korea hasn't proven they can bring a warhead back into the atmosphere. that's what north korea still feels they need to prove. this is the same official who told me back in october that north korea basically had to show the trump administration two things. one, they had an icbm, they showed that today. two, that they can detonate this device, which would be an above ground nuclear test like the kind that north korea's foreign minister threatened back in september, possibly over the pacific ocean. it could just be posturing. maybe we could see another underground nuclear test, but the sense i have gotten from repeated conversations with north korean officials is in order to round off their nuclear program, they need to conduct this type of above ground test that would be so alarming and so provocative to the rest of the world. they point to china which did it 40 years ago, the united states, russia, all nuclear powers that had to conduct above ground tests to get their programs to a certain stage. the north koreans feel they're

almost at that stage, just a couple more steps to go. of course, the big unknown, how would the united states and the region respond to that? >> yeah, how has south korea responded so far? >> well, you know, you have president moon who was speaking in the last few hours. this is sapresident who came into power after an impeachment, promising not to take a hawkish approach to north korea. talking about peace, sitting down and having discussions with kim jong-un, now saying if north korea continues this kind of behavior, peace would be impossible. then you had the unification minister even before this missile launch saying that their analysts here in south korea now believe that north korea is closer than anyone ever expected to finalizing, finishing their nuclear program, and the u.s. has stated that it could be early next year, perhaps a matter of weeks before north korea has this reliable icbm nuclear capable in their arsenal. >> that north korean official you talked about, he talked about two conditions essentially north korea wants to achieve.

an icbm, intercontinental ballistic missile and some sort of above ground test. have they ruled out diplomacy with the u.s. until they can demonstrate their nuclear capabilities? >> they're not ruling out diplomacy all together, but there are a number of things that lead the north koreans to believe diplomacy is not an option right now. first, the mixed messaging from the trump administration. you had secretary tillerson talking about diplomacy, and then president trump beating the war drum, calling their leader rocketman, saying the u.s. can to totally destroy north korea, bolstering the fact that they have to arm themselves against the united states. the north koreans do want to talk to the united states at some point, but they want to do it after they feel they have proven to themselves and the world that they have this full fledged nuclear program so they will be accepted into the international community as a nuclear power because they have said repeatedly, even as recently as a couple weeks ago,

that getting rid of their nuclear arsenal is simply no longer an option they would even consider. >> will, you have been there more than anybody i know, certainly, for cnn repeatedly. does any of this surprise you? given what you have seen, given the militarization that we have all seen in images and what you have seen on the ground, can you explain what their mind frame is on this? >> yeah, this test absolutely not a surprise to me. yes, it's been more than two months since north korea conducted their last missile launch over northern japan, then they had the nuclear test back in september as well. but this long pause, think about the kind of things they're trying to accomplish now. these are big tests and they need to get them right. it could have been technical reasons, could have been political reasons at home. north korea's leader has been appearing in state media talking a lot about bolstering his state's economy in the face of sanctions because they're expecting to really feel the impact of the sanctions in north

korea, but they're trying to tell their people even though they're going to keep launching missiles and developing nuclear weapons, they're also somehow going to try to provide them a better living standard as a result. >> will ripley, appreciate that tonight. thank you very much wroorb. coming up next, one senator warns against war with north korea. our military experts weigh in on what it would look like and what it would look like when it's over. later, how the president won over republicans and dissed two democratic leaders on taxes today. a tale of two empty seats, as you see there, when we continue. each year sarah climbs 58,007 steps. that's the height of mount everest. because each day she chooses to take the stairs. at work, at home... even on the escalator. that can be hard on her lower body, so now she does it with dr. scholl's orthotics. clinically proven to relieve and prevent foot, knee or lower back pain,

by reducing the shock and stress that travel up her body with every step she takes. so keep on climbing, sarah. you're killing it. dr. scholl's. born to move. you supported him through four years of undergrad... and medical school. it's no wonder he said, "you don't have to pick me up." at lincoln financial, we get there are some responsibilities of love you gotta do on your own. and some you shouldn't have to shoulder alone. like being able to retire more confidently, no matter what comes your way. lincoln can help, with income that lasts every year of your retirement, guaranteed. see how at lincolnfinancial.com.

i kept looking for ways to manage my symptoms. i thought i was doing okay. then it hit me... managing was all i was doing. when i told my doctor, i learned humira is for people who still have symptoms of moderate to severe crohn's disease even after trying other medications. in clinical studies, the majority of people on humira saw significant symptom relief and many achieved remission. humira can lower your ability to fight infections, including tuberculosis. serious, sometimes fatal infections and cancers, including lymphoma, have happened; as have blood, liver, and nervous system problems, serious allergic reactions, and new or worsening heart failure. before treatment, get tested for tb. tell your doctor if you've been to areas where certain fungal infections are common, and if you've had tb, hepatitis b, are prone to infections,

or have flu-like symptoms or sores. don't start humira if you have an infection. just managing your symptoms? ask your gastroenterologist about humira. with humira, remission is possible. at t-mobile, when you holiday together, great things come in twos. like t-mobile and netflix. right now when you get an unlimited family plan, netflix is included. ho ho ho! t-mobile covers your netflix subscription... best christmas gift ever! ...so you can binge watch all year long. now you're thinking christmas! and now when you buy any of this season's hot new samsung galaxy phones,

you get a second one free to gift. that's one samsung for you. and one to give. t-mobile. holiday twogether. a short time ago, lindsey graham spoke about the possibility of war with north korea. i want you to hear what he told wolf blitzer on "the situation room" tonight. >> i don't want a war, he doesn't want a war, but we're not going to let this crazy man

in north korea have the capability to hit the homeland. we're not going to live this way. to our friends in china, we're not going to live this way. you need to help us. if you don't help us, we'll take care of it. us taking care of it means the war's in your backyard, not ours. >> taking hundreds of thousands of lives on the korean peninsula and possibly beyond. joining us, mark hertling and retired air force colonel rick francona. how big a step forward, first of all, is this for north korea, the fact that they now may be able to hit the east coast of the united states? >> it's pretty big, anderson. you take a look at some of the data that came off this missile launch, and it shows a significant improvement. what we're talking about whenever you launch a missile that's three phases. you have the boost phase as it comes off the pad. they have had that down for a while. then you have the midcourse phase. for to travel up to 4700 kilometers, that's higher than the space station is circling. that means it can get in upper atmosphere and come down wherever it wants.

then, you have the reentry phase. so the fact that it traveled as far as it did, as high as it did, is significant. the last missile they shot up hit 3500 kilometers, and that was a big launch. so from the standpoint of technical capability of this rocket, it was an improvement, and they're showing steady improvements across the board in their missile systems. >> the speed with which north korea's nuclear capability seems to be increasing, what is that due to? >> this is what is surprising, the fact they're achieving these goals so quickly. as the general said, they have already mastered these three phases of flight. they have already mastered the staging. that's also a very critical part, is having the ability to launch multi-staged rockets. now, they have done that. i think that their stumbling block right now is this re-entry, the third phase. when this vehicle re-entered the atmosphere, it has to survive. the north koreans claimed a few

months ago and showed us pictures of that miniature nuclear weapon. they need a housing for that that survives. that's what they're working on now. i think that's the next step. but that's not it. they're not done just yet. they won't present this in a few weeks. they're going to have to have some way to fuse it and guide it. so we still have some time, hopefully, for diplomacy to work. >> general, the president said today we'll take care of, and that it's a situation that we will handle. that's a quote. do you know what that means exactly? because i mean, when obviously there's diplomacy, but military options, we have talked about this before, none of them seem good. >> none of them all good, anderson. and i heard the president say that. i'm a little bit concerned about that because there is no published strategy. now, of course, president trump has said in the past that he's not going to let people know what he's doing, but there doesn't seem to be an indication that there is a strategy for this particular area of the urld. there's been a lot of talk about coordinating with china in an attempt to get north korea to do our bidding, but the truth is we also need to get russia.

russia supported north korea for about 20 years in the '80s and the '90s, gave them a whole lot of financial support, and in fact, fed the regime. so i think russia needs to play a part in this too. frankly, i believe russia is countering every action of the united states in this part of the world to cause more confusion. but to get to the conflict that you just talked about, if you have studied the korean conflict of the '50s, you will know that it is a conventional war without equal. it was very tough. you talk about frozen -- in fact, baldwin went over there a couple weeks ago and i talked to her before she went, and i said when you get in a helicopter around the dmz, look at the terrain because it's some of the most difficult terrain to fight a conventional war in that you can imagine. if that's not the kind of war we're going to fight, if it's something else, and i don't want to mention what that might be, the artillery, the rockets and all of the things that north korea has to fire on seoul has

been reported many times, can kill hundreds of thousands of people, more if you're talking about a nuclear exchange. >> very briefly, an icbm heading to the united states, is that something that can be taken down? >> it can. we have missile defense systems. there are systems in japan, there are systems on the west coast of the united states. in hawaii and in guam and in other places. but truthfully, anderson, we would know of a launch through str stratcom, and they would be able to tell it, but when you're talking about a missile, an icbm missile launch, it's hard, very hard. >> appreciate it. coming up, the state of the republican tax bill. the president visits capitol hill today. the bill passes the senate budget committee, so we'll tell you what's next and of course what's at stake. one in customer satisfaction over cable for 17 years running. but some people still like cable. just like some people like wet grocery bags. getting a bad haircut.

overcrowded trains. turnstiles that don't turn. and spilling coffee on themselves. but for everyone else, there's directv. for #1 rated customer satisfaction over cable, switch to directv. and for a limited time get a $100 reward card. call 1-800-directv

it's a lot easier to make decisions when you know what comes next. if you move your old 401(k) to a fidelity ira, we make sure you're in the loop at every step from the moment you decide to move your money to the instant your new retirement account is funded. ♪ oh and at fidelity, you'll see how all your investments are working together. because when you know where you stand, things are just clearer. ♪ just remember what i said about a little bit o' soul ♪

as we get closer to tonight's cnn tax debate, more on the senate tax bill that moved forward today. the questions are what did it take to get to this point, and most importantly, what's in the bill for people to look forward to or be aware of. cnn's phil mattingly joins us from capitol hill with what he's learning tonight. what's the current state of play? does it look like the tax bill is going to make it through? >> look, anderson, they're in a much better place right now than this morning, no question about it. what's important to note, even though it's gone through the committee process, there's still a lot of hurdles left. mitch mcconnell, the senate majority leader likened this whole prosto trying to work with a rubik's cube. a lot of competing demands. you have deficit hawks on the republican side of things. this is a $1.5 trillion proposal, and these individuals don't want it to add to the

deficit or debt in the long term. they want a trigger, basically something that would snap back the tax rates into play if the economic growth projections didn't match up to what they were looking for. that's senator james lankford, senator jeff flakes. then you have susan collins who a lot of people assumed webe a no from the get go. that's not the case. she's closer to yes. why? she's gotten a commitment than will add the state and property taxes capped. then you have to look at the issues that really kind of bogged this down leading into today, the passthrough rate. people like senator ron johnson, senator steve dayneeigns, they the rates for llcs, partnerships, s-corps to be expanded further. then you have marco rubio, a proponent of expanding the child tax credit. the senate bill does that, but it's not fully refundable. that's what senator marco rubio wants. in closing and why this all matters, a lot of those things

cost a lot of money. that's where senators right now are trying to figure out how to get this across the finish line. that's where majority leader mitch mcconnell is trying to figure out if he can actually get this done. they're in a much better place than this morning. >> the cbo has scored this. can you explain what kind of impact this would have on americans if it were to pass in its current form. >> the issue is if you look at the analysis we have seen, there's one current theme. that is lower income americans, lower to middle income americans start to get hit, start to actually see tax increases at varying paces that runs contradictly to what you have heard republicans say. a lot is because of the repeal of obamacare's individual man tate. those makes under $30,000 would start to get hit in 2019. those making under $40,000, 2021. those making under $75,000, a few years later. why you're seeing that is because the scoring is that the subsidies would be taken away and lead to a tax increase. republicans reject that idea all together.

they say take that out. people can still get insurance and get the subsidies. when that occurs, numbers look better until the end of the decade. 2027, look across the income brackets there, under $75,000, a lot of people getting a tax increase. why? the individual side sunsets because of budget reasons, because it costs a lot of money. this really underscores the priorities in this bill. the corporate cut from 35% down to 20%, that's made permanent. a lot of corporate side of things are made permanent. the individual side, that sunsets. what you understand is republicans relying heavily on this idea that what they're doing on the corporate side will create a lot of growth. they need to make that permanent for planning purposes, but what that takes away from is the individual side suffers if congress doesn't figure out a way to extend those tax cuts past 2025, anderson. >> phil mattingly, stay there. i want to bring in our senior economics analyst, stephen moore. he's an informal adviser to the white house on tax policy. also with us is dylan ratigan author of greedy bastards, how

we can stop corporate communities and other vampires from sucking america dry. quite a title. you see it, do you buy what the cbo has said about this bill? >> i mean, you buy what the cbo says, i would say within, you know, a 25% margin of error. it's going to create some sort of deficit. is the cbo right? probably not. are they in the right direction? probably. the thing that really strikes me about this, anderson, is there's an extremely valid argument for the idea of warehousing capital in the private sector, putting more capital in the hands, whether it's corporations or individuals, for it to be invested in society. that's a very valid argument for the use of tax policy. what's confusing to me about this is that the idea of warehousing more capital in the private sector by altering the tax policy is not being matched in a way that rewards actual

investment in the development of enterprise in america and the creation of jobs. it's one thing to put more money in the hands of wealthy corporations and individuals. it's another thing to only put that money in the hands of wealthy individuals and corporations contingent on an investment in american enterprise that creates jobs, and i would argue that that's a significant oversight in the overall interpretation of the policy. again, you don't want the government to have more money, i understand that. you want to have private individuals have more money? i understand that, but to put more money in really wealthy hands without creating a d disstink incentive to invest it is nonsensical, and it goes against the biggest companies, and i feel like there's an attack on the economic engine of america. >> let me -- >> for the working. >> every republican i have talked to says, look, this is going to create jobs because these companies are going to be

hiring more people. how can you guarantee that? >> well, there's never any guarantees. by the way, this was a very big day, anderson, for the tax bill. i think it's looking more and more certain. i would say 80% odds now that republicans are going to get this done, in part because they realize there's no turning back now. look, i disagree a little bit with dylan's analysis. dylan, i think one of the big things that's going to cause a big burst of growth and investment spending starting on january 1st of 2018 is the immediate expensing. and anderson, that allows businesses to invest in building a new plant or equipment or new machinery and basically you get to write it off the first year. i talked to a lot of business men and women, dylan, who say you put that in, we'll start spending right away. i think you could see 4% to 4.5% growth in the first half of next year as a result of that. and look, i also disagree with

you on one other thing. i do think this is going to bring a lot of capital, dylan, back to the united states. i think a lot of those, the outsourcing that's happened for the last 15 or 20 years of companies leaving the united states, i think a lot of those companies will come back as we make our tax rates more competitive globally. >> and i don't even disagree with that as somebody who has invested mrls millions of dolls in a business in louisiana, the advantage of the immediate write-off that personally will affect the way we do our budget next year. i don't disagree with what you said, but if the idea is to create more capital in the hands of entrepreneurs and businesses for the explicit purpose of creating more robust american enterprise and more jobs, which is the basic fundamental argument between whether you put more money in the public or private sector, why not be more explicit and tie that tax benefit explicitly to bringing the money onshore, as you suggest it may happen. but why should we put all of this money into the private sector and then hope as opposed

to really create guardrails to insure that's how the capital flows. >> it's a good idea. and look, this bill is not done, by any means, as you just heard. there are a lot of bridges to gap in terms of the house and senate bill. one of the complaints, anderson, that we're hearing from some of the senators is there's not enough tax cut for the small businesses, the kind dylan is talking about. i think that's something that has to be fixed. more reductions in it, because you're right, dylan, the small businesses, the entrepreneurial companies, that's where the jobs come from. >> i want to ask phil, all these tax cuts, phil, cost money too. the cbo projected it's going to add $1.4 trillion to the deficit. how concerns are republicans about that number? a lot of them simply don't buy that number. >> i think they're not concerned about the $1.4 trillion because they're assuming growth projections. that's the entire crux of thas this, why you want the corporate side to plan long term, use what they're getting, the permanence of that, to create jobs, to

create growth, to create wage growth. i think the issue right now is, look, we haven't seen what's called a dynamic score where at least a legitimate dynamic score from the nonpartisan analysis that lays out what kind of growth you're going to see, but what we have seen on both the static side and on some of the early iterations of that dynamic score is that there's nowhere near enough growth that's going to create $1.4 trillion. i assume steve is going to disagree with me on this one, but i think the bottom line here is republicans have very, very rosy projections on growth in kind of the near term and on growth over the next ten years. >> i'll give you one -- >> i have to get a break in. to be continued. and dylan, i think i said helical holdings. >> thanks very much. on the subject, stay tuned at the top of the hour for cnn debate night, the fight over tax reform. >> also, another woman says john conyers sexually harassed her. we'll tell you her story, and new word tonight of a possible effort to get conyers to resign. who are these people?

the energy conscious people among us say small actions can add up to something... humongous. a little thing here. a little thing there. starts to feel like a badge maybe millions can wear.

who are all these caretakers, advocates too? turns out, it's californians it's me and it's you. don't stop now, it's easy to add to the routine. join energy upgrade california and do your thing. forward to accuse congressman john conyers of sexual ahasment. there's also a house ethics committee investigation under way after other allegations again him. he's denied wrongdoing, now several democratic sources tell cnn there's an effort from several members of the congressional black caucus to get conyers to resign. >> deanna can still remember how she felt that night in 1997 when she says michigan congressman john conjures made unwanted sexual advances toward her. >> all of a sudden, john conyers

walked into my bedroom. >> she was in her 50s at the time and as conyers' deputy chief of staff, she traveled to washington with him for an event. she says she later discovered she was sharing a two-bedroom hotel suite with him. >> i was absolutely shaking. and he took off his clothes. and then i figured out, oh, my god. what did i do? how stupid at my age that i walked in and got myself into a situation like that. >> she says there were two more incidents involving conyers, one in the spring of 1998 when she says conyers touched her as he drove them both to the airport. >> his hand was feeling me all over my -- what do you call it, my abdomen. >> in 1999, she said she was on stage during a conyers community town hall. >> he walked up to act like he was whispering in my ear, something about the town hall meeting, and he stuck his hand

up my dress. and whispered in my ear, wow, you've got great looking legs. and that is in front of everyone. >> she says the office culture was one of inappropriate behavior and that conyers wasn't the only person in the office who harassed her. a male staffer also forcibly kissed her and documents she shared with cnn shows she reported it to the fbi and the house ethics committee. she retired in 2005. >> this is why i want to, and i'm saying before i die, and because i'm going on 80, i want to before i die see changes made. i want to see a different capitol hill. >> deanna maher is now the fourth victim whose allegations against conyers have been made

public, anderson. he's 88 years old and tonight he's under pressure from democrats, from the congressional black caucus, to step down, to resign from his job. he's the longest member of -- longest serving member of congress. he's also one of the founding members of the congressional black caucus. and given all of that, the democrats are kind of doing this dance, trying to figure out a way for there to be consequences for these allegations while giving him a sort of ease, a way of stepping down without, as they put it, the trampling on his legacy, anderson. >> all right. i think she gave good testimony about what his legacy may actually be. also in washington, a court ruling on who will be the acting director of the consumer financial protection bureau. jessica schneider joins us with that. what did the judge decide? >> anderson, mick mulvaney will stay in as acting director. the federal judge ruled that he will not overturn the president's pick, and he also ruled that leandra english, who was named to that same position by the outgoing director when he

resigned friday, she didn't show the irreparable harm that was necessary for the judge to grant her a temporary restraining order. it was just monday morning when both mulvaney and english showed up at the cfpb, staked their claim to the acting director title, even sending dueling e-mails to staff, but the judge saying mick mulvaney has the rightful claim to the acting director position. >> does that mean that battle of the bosses is over? >> well, for now, yes. but leandra english's attorney, he is promising to continue the fight. holding on to that argument that she is the rightful acting director under the language of the dodd/frank act, that's the law that set up the consumer watchdog agency in the first place, so her attorney, anderson, saying he'll either file a new motion in federal court or he'll appeal this directly to the d.c. circuit, but it's interesting to remember this. english, she's still at the bureau. she has the title of deputy director. president trump hasn't fired her, so she's still there,

presumably she'll be at work tomorrow, but of course, the official boss after this ruling today will be mick mulvaney, at least for now. >> jessica, thank yous very much. >> up next, president trump calling elizabeth warren pocahontas, and the white house claiming she claimed native american ancestry to help her career. jeffrey toobin with the details ahead. breathe. so to breathe better, i go with anoro. ♪go your own way copd tries to say, "go this way." i say, "i'll go my own way" with anoro. ♪go your own way once-daily anoro contains two medicines called bronchodilators, that work together to significantly improve lung function all day and all night. anoro is not for asthma . it contains a type of medicine that increases risk of death in people with asthma. the risk is unknown in copd. anoro won't replace rescue inhalers for sudden symptoms and should not be used more than once a day. tell your doctor if you have

a heart condition, high blood pressure, glaucoma, prostate, bladder, or urinary problems. these may worsen with anoro. call your doctor if you have worsened breathing, chest pain, mouth or tongue swelling, problems urinating, vision changes, or eye pain while taking anoro. ask your doctor about anoro. ♪go your own way get your first prescription free at anoro.com. at t-mobile, when you holiday together, great things come in twos. like t-mobile and netflix. right now when you get an unlimited family plan, netflix is included. ho ho ho! t-mobile covers your netflix subscription... best christmas gift ever! ...so you can binge watch all year long. now you're thinking christmas! and now when you buy any of this season's hot new samsung galaxy phones, you get a second one free to gift. that's one samsung for you. and one to give. t-mobile. holiday twogether. no matter what it brings. every day. or where he is. and pain doesn't hold him back. thanks to dr. scholl's running insoles. the only ones proven to relieve

and prevent pain from runner's knee, shin splints and plantar fasciitis. dr. scholl's. born to move. whstuff happens. old

shut down cold symptoms fast with maximum strength alka seltzer plus liquid gels. why did you take credit card debt on? second kid. private school. medical bills. moving costs. solid ground. a personal loan from sofi is a smart way to consolidate credit card debt. certain borrowers cut their credit card interest rates 42% and increased credit scores 17 points on average. borrow up to $100,000 with low rates and no hidden fees.

find your rate in just two minutes, and take on your debt at sofi.com. today, eric trump jumped to the fray over the president's use of the name pocahontas during a meeting with native american war heroes yesterday. this morning, he tweeted saying the irony of an abc reporter whose company has profited on

the movie pocahontas inferring that the name is offensive is truly staggering to me. the reporter he was referring to is jonathan karl who asked sarah sanders about what the president said yesterday. >> i just want to thank you because you're very, very special people. you were here long before any of us were here. although we have a representative in congress who they say was here a long time ago. they call her pocahontas. >> well, just after those remarks, multiple reporters including abc's jonathan karl asked sarah sanders about what the president said. here's part of her response to another reporter, kristen welker of nbc. >> is it appropriate for the president to use a racial slur in any context? >> i don't believe that it is appropriate for him to make a racial slur. >> a lot of people as though this is a racial slur. why is it appropriate for him to use that? >> like i said, i don't think that it is. i don't think that was certainly not the president's intent.

>> does he see -- >> the more offensive, the most offensive thing -- >> i'm sorry. >> does he see political value in calling people out racially? why use that term? >> look, i think that senator warren was very offensive when she lied about something specifically to advance her career. i don't understand why no one is asking about that question and why that isn't constantly covered. >> well, keeping them honest, cnn's chief legal analyst jeff rhee toobin wrote an in depth profile about senator warren for the new yorker. you heard what sarah sanders said. did elizabeth warren claim native american heritage to advance her career. >> two false statements in one sentence by mrs. sanders there. first, she never used it to advance her career. i went through the ten-year process at harvard, they didn't know that she had ever claimed native american background. it was of no benefit to her.

she got tenure completely independent of any sort of native american background she has. in terms of her native american background, her family, like a lot of families in oklahoma, white families, there's a family story that a couple generations back, there were some native americans. if you talk to people in oklahoma, white people, it's very common. it's not like some exot, crazy claim. go ahead. >> my dad's family in mississippi always thought there was native american and i did an ancestry test and there isn't. >> many of us have family stories that may turn out to be true, may turn out to be untrue, but there's nothing -- >> did she ever write down on a form, i am part native american? >> it did appear, yes, in certain law directories, and that's the root of this controversy, that it did appear in these directories, but she

said she passed it on because it was a family story. but as far as i could tell, she never got any benefit from it. and she got no affirmative action. she wasn't hired because of it. it was just something that she wrote on a form. >> so did she, on the forms, did she describe herself as>> the f specific. one 30-second. a lot of people measure themselves that way. >> jeffrey toobin, thanks. more on the cnn debate tonight. there are two weeks left to vote for the cnn hero of the year. you can do that right now online. tonight on what's known as giving tuesday, this is how you can support this year's cnn heroes. >> go to cnn heroes.com and click donate to make a direct

contribution to that person. you'll receive an e-mail confirming your donation which is tax deductible in the united states. no matter the amount, you can make a big difference helping our heroes continue their life-changing work. a way to separate all these everyday people chapgds the world. you can do not from your laptop, our tablet, or your phone. just go to cnn heroes.com, your donation in any amount will help them help others. thanks.

the president just tweeted time to show down with north korea. the tweet reads after north korea missile launched it's more important to fund your government and military.

democrats shouldn't hold troops -- with that on the table we're minutes away from cnn's town hall debate over tax reform. bernie sanders, maria cantwell squaring off with ted cruz and tim scott. legislation involving terminals of dollars affecting every taxpayer in the country. perhaps it could shake up congress as well. gloria borger is here. gloria no doubt it clearly is a win for the white house and if the president. >> absolutely a win, before you can get something to the floor, you have to get it through committee. they made a lot of promises when the president met with senate helps today. but promises made are not promises kept, so there's still a long way to go.

before they get to that vote this week. every senator who has made a promise, like susan collins or bob corker, they're going to be watching to see how this bill morphs. i want to say something about the president's tweet. it's kind of a bookend to his tweet, i don't see a deal, we may have to shut the government down, and that's why they decided not to go to his meeting, but he's really every day seems to now be pushing towards blaming the democrats if, in fact, they can't come to on agreement on immigration and other things that he thinks. >> scott, the budget committee vote, the first of many hurdles to get reluctant republicans over the finish line. >> yeah, the committee vote today when you see johnson and corker come on board, that makes it more likely it's going to fas senate. they still have to reconcile

this version with the house version, but you can feel the momentum right now in the republican party. they also confirmed another judge today. and so senator mcconnell and donald trump are working together on that. the conference really wants to get a victory. they hadn't to cut people's taxes and they want to keep a promise. they're still smarting from the loss over obamacare. this would help reverse that by eliminating the individual mandate while fulfilling another big campaign promise and keeping this momentum going. you can feel it happening, and i would say better than 50% odds they get this thing passed by friday. >> peter, some senate republicans are optimistic after lunch with the president today. interesting to see his level of involvement with the negotiations and how badly the president and congressional republicans need a legislative win. >> they desperately need a legislative win which is why they're pushing this throw even though there have been no hearings and not waiting for

congress's budget tarry analyses. and only one said this would increase economic growth. they don't seem concerned by according to the joint committee on taxation by 2027 taxes on americans earning under $75,000 under this plan will go up because you're right, they're simply desperate to say they did something and they cut taxes even though the vast majority of the taxes they cut will be for the very rich who doesn't need them. >> scott, do you agree? >> i'm sitting here in louisville tonight. we know a thing or two about horses out this way. and i can tell when they're beating a dead one. these are the same tired talking points from democrats every time republicans want to stimulate the economy. you get the same stale talking points and calling wolf. we want to see this promise zblufrld we've seen this twice

before, when reagan did this in the early '80s, george w. bush, the budget deficit went way, way up. this is not tired talking points. we know how this plays out. we know reducing taxes for the very rich is not the best way to stimulate the economy. >> you know, anderson, the good news -- >> they are taxing across the board here. >> gloria? >> the good news for republicans as scott says is they get the tax bill. the bad news for republicans is that they may get the tax bill. in the end if people don't see their taxes go up, if they see tax breaks for corporations and the wealthy become permanent and their tax breaks expire, then it's got republicans' brand on it and the president's name on it. they want to get this done. they didn't get health care done. i agree with scott. i think it's more likely than not that they are going to get this through, but they've made a

lot of promises and they have to keep them. >> this back and forth, peter, between the president, chuck schumer, tweets, empty shares, pelosi and schumer skipping the meeting, does it play for any side here? >> it plays for both sides. democrats don't like donald trump. chuck schumer and nancy pelosi can stand up to trump because their supporters hate donald trump. is so it's good to them, but also good for trump. it's political fear that benefits both sides. i'm not sure it's good for the country. >> the fact is the president needs democrats to avert a government shutdown. >> he does, but there's going to be a lot chatter about shutting down the government. it would be galactically stupid. the economy's humming along, the finance committee vote today caused the stock market to go up. we're heading for a tax bill that republicans are going to

cause great economic growth. heading towards solutions, it would just be really, really dumb politics. the democrats look really small today by not showing up, not just to talk about fiscal issues but they didn't show up. >> when we five seconds. thank you for watching. cnn debate night the fight over tax reform starts now. [ cheers and applause ] this is cnn's debate night. i'm jake tapper. >> and i'm dana bash. the senate is on the verge of the legislative victory or a another majorna