use short of starving the people of north korea to death. >> behind the scenes, white house officials say they are taking steps. experts tell us that could mean u.s. cyber command is launching their own offensive to disrupt kim's hackers. >> very disturbing. brian todd reporting. that's it for me. thanks for watching. "erin burnett outfront" starts right now. "outfront" next, breaking news. the senate voting on the tax bill just moments from now. as the house has to revote because the bill broke legislative rules. at the white house, team trump insisting the tax bill will not benefit the president himself. plus, a top republican calling for the deputy director of the fbi to step down. all part of a republican effort to undermine the russia investigation. will it work? and a navy pilot sees an unidentified flying object. why he insists it is, quote, not from this world. let's go "outfront." good evening.

i'm jim sciutto in for erin burnett tonight. "outfront" tonight, breaking news. we're standing by for landmark vote, one that will upend the nation's tax code as we know it. the senate expected to begin voting on the final version of the massive republican tax bill, but now the house in something of an embarrassing twist has to vote again on the 1,997 page piece of legislation due to a procedural error. still, all signs point to this bill passing. a major accomplishment, no doubt, for the president. but it is not without controversy. especially when it comes to who wins and who loses. the president has been adamant that he is on the losing side when it comes to this bill. >> this is going to cost me a fortune, this thing, believe me. believe me. this is not good for me. me, it's not -- i have very wealthy friends. not so happy with me, but that's okay. >> today, sarah sanders defended

that remark. >> look, we expect that it likely will certainly on the personal side could cost the president a lot of money. >> however, analysis of the tax bill have shown that claim to be very misleading. case in point, it dramatically lowers taxes on so-called passthrough businesses. which is how most if not all of trump's own businesses are structured. that change specifically benefits real estate investors, and of course, it is real estate that generates tens of millions of dollars per year for the president. which may explain why sarah sanders had to change her tune halfway through the briefing. >> in some ways, particularly on the personal side, the president will likely take a big hit. but on the business side, he could benefit. >> but let's be clear. president trump's personal and business lives are so intertwined that it is nearly impossible to separate the two, and of course, we have no more clarity on the issue because, of course, the president has not

and will not release his tax returns. a lot to get to tonight on this breaking news story. sunlen serfaty is on capitol hill. the senate is about to vote as we said, but this will eventually have to go back to the house for a revote. explain how that happened. >> that's right. this is really an unexpected last-minute setback for republicans up here on capitol hill that will force republicans in the house to have a second vote on this tax bill and delay final passage of the tax bill. so how did all of this happen? there are some technical changes that need to be made, some technical glitches because of the senate's budget rules that need to be changed to the senate side. they will make those changes, those tweaks tonight. they will vote on that tonight. but of course, the house has to vote and pass through a mirror image of that bill. so the senate will vote tonight, the house will revote tomorrow. there is no question that this will still indeed go forward and pass through. the bill is certainly not in jeopardy, but this is a day, of

course, jim, that republicans wanted to becelebrating a big passage of this tax bill today, and certainly not wanting to focus on technical procedural glitches, not want to talk about a second house vote. that's to say republicans are already seizing on this issue saying it speaks to rushed nature of this. but most likely, by the end of tomorrow, this bill will be passed on capitol hill and sent to president trump for his signature. >> before christmas, as the president said. sunlen serfaty on the >> look for that signing ceremony, the president to sign the bill, into law to come immediately after that.

there's some procedural matters that have to happen in rolling the bill, sending it formally from the capitol here to the white house, but the president is not waiting. i'm told by advisers and aides tonight, the president has invited republican leaders and others here to the white house tomorrow afternoon for a ceremony and event marking the passage of the bill. they want to keep this sort of energy and spirit alive here, so the president will sign it at a later date. we're not exactly sure when that will be, but tomorrow it's a big achievement in a legislative way so far this year. >> at least for now, public opinion polls show this bill not particularly popular. and president trump himself, a new cnn poll finds that his approval rating has sunk to yet another new low. the numbers there down to 35% approval rating. what's the response at the white house? >> jim, that is one of the things that our new poll today, you're right, shows president trump's approval rating is at

35%. that is something that is a record low for every president dating back to eisenhower in the first term of the presidency. so in modern polling, this president has a low rating. that's just not because of legislative achievements. that's because of the full picture of what's going on here. of course, the russia investigation, all the president, you know, his travel ban, everything he says that has been controversial, that is all factored into this here, but white house officials hope that this big achievement will actually help lift some of those numbers. that is their hope and belief. and republicans, jim, in this town, hope the president sticks to talking about this and not a variety of other matters. but again, as we know, a lot is built into that 35%. there's a lot that some americans don't like about him. not necessarily having anything to do with the tax plan. jim. >> jeff zeleny at the white house, thanks very much. "outfront" now, douglas hol holtz-eak holtz-eakin. he supports this tax bill, and robert reich, former u.s. labor

secretary under president clint clinton. his new movie "saving capitalism" is on netflix now. he's opposed to the bill. you heard the white house again defending the president's claim that this bill hurts him. but a couple of facts here. forbes is estimating that this, the president himself could benefit to the tune of $11 million based on the most recent tax return we have seen, of course, from 2005. we don't have the whole picture here. how do you respond to that? >> it's hard to imagine this doesn't help him personally. the only story you can tell is one where he has such enormous tax losses from past losses on his business that he has no taxable income on his passthrough part and he's not making that much at the white house and donating most of it to charity, but it's a pretty implausible story. as you said, if we had his tax returns, we would know the facts. we don't. it seems really unlikely to me. >> i mean, you mentioned it there, passthrough. basically, what you do as a real estate developer now instead of paying a personal income tax rate up to 39%, they now call

that in effect a corporation, so you pay the 21%, the new corporate tax rate, is that right? is that why the benefit is most likely to come to him? >> the passthroughs are an idea where you take business income, whether it's a partnership or an s-corporation or could be real estate or some industry, and you pass through the business profits to the owners. the idea was to make sure that business incomes are taxed at the appropriate rate. the rate at which the owner should be taxed. if they're a high income individual, taxed at a high rate, if they're low income individual, taxed at a low rate. it was an innovation to try to get things right. when they changed the rates, however, there are winners and losers. among the winners are anybody with a passthrough structure because we have lowered the rate on that. >> that includes real estate developers. which of course the president is. >> it includes real estate developers. >> which the president often reminds us he is. robert, the claim here from

republicans is this is going to add to growth. you're going to put more money in the hands of corporations and the middle class is going to get a cut as well. what's your response? >> there's no evidence that has ever been the case, jim. the way you grow the economy is you invest in people. you invest in education and job skills. you invest in their health. you invest in infrastructure that binds us together. and this bill is actually not only not doing that, it's going to make it harder in the future to make those kinds of investments in our people. this is trickle-down economics on steroids. this is an example of the kind of worst republican kind of thinking about, you know, you give big corporations big tax breaks. you give billionaires and real estate developers big tax breaks, and somehow that's going to help everybody else and make the economy large and grow. well, it's just not going to happen. in fact, quite the opposite. >> douglas, how do you respond to that, because you look back to the reagan tax cut in 1986, often cited in the debate

leading up to this tax cut. you look at george w. bush's tax cut in the early 2000s. is there any economic evidence with those two cuts that it significantly added to economic growth? >> let's be very clear. this isn't '86 where we raised taxes on corporations to finance large cuts on marginalized individuals. >> i asked a pretty basic question. is there evidence that past big tax cuts actually measurably added to growth. >> we have never done this before. so there is no past evidence on this experiment. we will for the very first time in the history of the united states move from a global system of income taxation to a territorial system of income taxation. we will change a status quo where every firm has the incentive to put its intellectual property overseas. put the production over there. when you make money, keep it over there. if there's ever a merger acquisition, move the headquarters over there. the fundamental importance of this bill is the reforms to those tax incentives so the

incentive is now to locate in the u.s., innovate in the u.s., hire and pay better in the u.s. >> i hear that. >> so you can't say this isn't '86, oh, there's no evidence from those episodes. >> it would help if you could cite a previous tax cut that added to economic growth. >> it's not about the tax cuts. it's not about the tax cuts. it is about the reforms. if i could finish -- >> can i just -- i have to ask. >> let's give rob a chance to answer. >> if it's not about the tax cuts, what is it actually, doug? what is going oon here? this is the biggest tax cut i have seen in living memory, if it's not about the tax cuts, what is your view of what this is about? >> this is about tax reform of business taxation in the united states. beginning with the c-corporations so we no longer have the status quo that drives economic activity outside of the united states but instead puts it here. and in the process -- can i finish? you asked the question.

in the process -- >> please do. >> in the process, there's incentives for the accumulation of capital. we know the shortest route to productivity and higher wages is higher capital per worker. that's what this is about. the passthrough provisions are meant to level the playing field through passthroughs and c' corporations which is just good tax policy. >> let me ask you this, robert, because this gets to one of these points that i think douglas is referring to. a lot of u.s. companies have hid their profits. apple to the tunes of tens of billions of dollars overseas. there is a provision to bring some of that back at a reduced rate. is that a benefit of this plan that you recognize? >> well, i don't understand. i mean, in 2004, the george w. bush administration had a very similar provision. you know, a tax holiday, bring all of those profits back. we'll give you a much reduced rate, and it didn't lead to any growth or investment new jobs. in fact, quite the opposite. you know, we have had a precursor for this. and it shows that there is absolutely no positive outcome.

we're going to have a $1.5 trillion addition to the debt. >> what was the precursor? >> we'll also have 13 million people lose their health insurance. what is good about this when we're giving huge tax breaks to people at the top and huge tax breaks to big corporations. at least most of the public knows what's going on here. >> we have to leave it there. >> hopefully bob will read the bear. >> in fairness -- >> yeah. this isn't a tax holiday. you have to pay the tax on your earnings overseas whether you bring it back or not. the litmus test of this bill's success will be does the money come back. i admit that. if it doesn't come back, this reform will not have worked. >> the litmus test is whether this actually leads to growth, and most americans, and it doesn't and it won't. >> that will be the test. we'll see that in the numbers. douglass says it's the first time we have tried this. robert said previous one, no evidence of it. we'll continue this conversation. thanks to both of you tonight. "outfront" next, republicans

step up their attacks on the russia probe, renewing calls for heads to roll. plus, the white house says there is no trouble with trump's judicial pick, so why have three of them dropped out of the running in just one week? and donald trump the robot. now in disney world's hall of presidents. why does he look like actor jon voight? we're on a mission to show the new keurig k select brewer is the strong way to start your day. pop that in there. hit strong. press brew. that's it. strong. bold. rich. i feel like you're toying with me. show me how strong you are. (screams)

lift me up! dan! lift me up! (screams) ♪ dad promised he would teach me how to surf on our trip. ♪ when you book a flight then add a hotel you can save. ♪ three waves later, i think it was the other way around... ♪ everything you need to go. ♪ expedia. but he hasoke up wwork to do.in. so he took aleve. if he'd taken tylenol, he'd be stopping for more pills right now. only aleve has the strength to stop tough pain for up to 12 hours with just one pill. aleve. all day strong. what's going on? oh hey! ♪ that's it? yeah. ♪ everybody two seconds! ♪

"dear sebastian, after careful consideration of your application, it is with great pleasure that we offer our congratulations on your acceptance..." through the tuition assistance program, every day mcdonald's helps more people go to college. it's part of our commitment to being america's best first job. ♪

another day of work. why do you do it? it's not just a pay check, you actually like what you do. even love it. and today, you can do things you never could before. ♪ ♪ you're developing ai applications on the cloud. finding insights hidden in decades of medical documents. and securing millions of iot sensors. so get back to it. and do the best work of your life.

♪ ♪ the breaking news, the fbi's second in command facing intense questioning from the house intelligence committee right now. andrew mccabe has been testifying behind closed doors on russia all day. this as a top republican is calling for mccabe to be fired. senator chuck grassley, the gop chairman of the judiciary committee saying he wants mccabe out. republicans slamming him for what they believe is anti-trump bias. a drum beat against mccabe comes in the midst of a concerted effort by republicans to discredit the fbi and the doj as the russia probe intensifies. "outfront" tonight, a member of the house intelligence committee. he's democratic congressman joaquin castro. congressman, thanks very much for joining us. i understand you just came out of this long questioning of the deputy fbi director. you have heard the republican charges. do you believe that he's biased

against the president? >> i haven't heard anything that would disqualify him or discredit him or suggest that he's in any way biased against the president. or give any reason to remove him from his job, no. >> part of the argument here that you hear from republicans, they note that his wife, she ran for office in virginia as a democrat. she received at the time contributions from then democratic governor of virginia terry mcauliffe, a very close friend as well of the clintons. how do you answer their questions about those personal ties to the democratic party? >> that his wife has her own life. and she's free to run for office. but people in general have their own political preferences. there were only two candidates for president, two main candidates for president last year. either donald trump or hillary clinton. so every american that voted, most people voted for one of those two. so i don't think that alone gets

you anywhere near discrediting somebody from serving their role in the fbi. >> beyond the personal comments, personal ties, rather, as you know, this criticism is also based on text messages now made public between fbi officials trading a series of text messages trashing then presidential candidate donald trump and one of those conversations appeared based on those released messages to have taken place in mccabe's office. does that concern you? >> well, from what i understand, included in those text messages were critical comments about other politicians who are not republicans also. so it wasn't just comments about the president. but remember also that the investigation into russia interference in the 2016 election is much bigger than any single person. and so i think the investigation has been run fairly. and it should proceed. >> let me ask you, just you're aware that this is in effect an

increasing argument you're hearing from some republican lawmakers as well as right-leaning newspapers, websites, television stations about robert mueller himself. and raising questions about the fbi. we heard from donald trump jr., the president's son, just a short time ago tonight, making this argument. have a listen. >> my father talked about a rigged system throughout the campaign, and people were oh, what are you talking about. but it is, and you're seeing it. there is, and there are, people at the highest levels of government that don't want to let america be america. >> that is a remarkable charge from the president's son. people at the highest levels of government that don't want to let america be america. what's your response to that? >> that it's an irresponsible charge, and also that the president, his family, and many of his associates are looking for every single angle and way that they can to discredit bob mueller and discredit any kind of investigation into any

cooperation between americans and the russians who interfered with the 2016 elections, including any americans who were associated with the trump campaign or the trump organization. >> i want to mention another comment. i spoke yesterday with james clapper, of course, the former director of national intelligence under president obama. i asked him about the relationship between trump and putin, including the phone call that trump spoke about between putin this week, including some mutual admiration expressed between the two. listen to what director clapper told me. >> this past weekend is illustrative of what a great case officer vladimir putin is. he knows how to handle an asset. that's what he's doing with the president. >> working an asset. to be clear, in this interview, because i followed up a number of times with director clapper. he said he was speaking figu figurati figuratively.

he was not alleging that the president is a russian asset, but he made clear he believes putin is working him as such. that's a remarkable charge to make. is he alone in that concern? >> i don't think it's any surprise. everybody knows that vladimir putin is a former officer in the kgb, that he's a very savvy and skilled politician. and that russia has an agenda, not only for its region in the world but in geopolitics generally. it is no surprise he would do everything possible to work over a rookie president who has never served in government before, that is now dealing with the vast apparatus that is the united states government, and all of our relationships in the world. so that's not a surprise at all. >> congressman castro, many thanks, and happy holidays. merry christmas to you. >> merry christmas. >> "outfront" next, the white house gets defensive when asked why three of trump's judicial picks in the past week alone could not pass muster. and new questions tonight about that deadly train

derailment. why was it going 80 miles per hour in a 30-mile-per-hour zone?

with advil's fast relief, you'll ask, "what pulled muscle?" "what headache?" nothing works faster to make pain a distant memory. advil liqui-gels and advil liqui-gels minis. what pain? advil liqui-gels and advil liqui-gels minis. it's a like, a dagger?a worm! a tiny sword? bread...breadstick? a matchstick! a lamppost! coin slot!

no? uhhh... 10 seconds. a stick! a walking stick! eiffel tower, mount kilimanjaro! (ding) time! sorry, it's a tandem bicycle. what? what?! as long as sloths are slow, you can count on geico saving folks money. fifteen minutes could save you fifteen percent or more on car insurance. wifiso if you can't live without it...t it. why aren't you using this guy? it makes your wifi awesomely fast.

no... still nope. now we're talking! it gets you wifi here, here, and here. it even lets you take a time out. no! no! yes! yes, indeed. amazing speed, coverage and control. all with an xfi gateway. find your awesome, and change the way you wifi. new tonight, trump's judicial picks under fire. three of his nominees have now withdrawn in just the last week. you may recognize the most recent, matthew peterson, from this video that went viral. >> have you ever tried a jury

trial? >> i have not. >> civil? >> no. >> criminal? >> no. >> bench? >> no. >> state or federal court? >> i have not. >> the white house is brushing off the troubles saying they are all, quote, standard. here is press secretary sarah sanders today. >> every administration has individuals that don't go all the way through the process. we have had 60 nominees and only three that haven't gone through this process. he has withdrawn his nomination. we haven't continued to go forward. that is pretty standard. >> let's be clear. it is not standard for a judicial nominee who will serve for life if confirmed to be stumped by the most basic legal questions. it is not standard for judicial nominees to blog favorably about the kkk. that's right, the kkk. that was the case with brett tally. and it's not standard for a judicial nominee to say that transgender children are evidence of, quote, satan's plan. those are the words of jeff

mateer. the white house has withdrawn its nominations of talley and mateer. peterson withdrew his own name. out front, jeffrey toobin, april ryan, and daily beast editor in chief, john avlon. jeffrey toobin, you know a thing or two about judge appointments. the white house says this is standard. that's 3 out of 60 nominees so far that had to be withdrawn. is that standard? >> it's not standard, but what's much more extraordinary about these judicial nominees, and this counts for all 60, is how much ideology matters. this has been an enormously successful group, you know, who represent anti-abortion rights, anti-gay rights, anti-voting rights, anti-separation of church and state. these nominees have been idealogically uniform in a way that no prior administration has been. they have also been the least

diverse group. i mean, if you saw that original shot, there were five white men sitting at that table. five. and that is typical of the bush nominees. very conservative, almost exclusively white men. and almost all getting through. these three didn't, but look, they are the exception. most of these nominees are getting through. >> april ryan, this is a strategy, certainly, inside the white house and a strategy that appears to be working by and large. >> it all depends upon what you mean by working. yes, they have people who espouse their ideology, and i talked with the naacp recently, and they said, you know, when you think of those issues with that ideology, you think of the alt-right, and the alt-right means white supremacists. but look at this. when you have peterson, when he said he did not serve, this

administration is doing what it's been doing. bringing people in who are not the typical judge or the typical politician or the typical secretary of some department. and with that, it leads to a lot of problems. and when you vet these people, you get the people who are not the american bar association who they're not using anymore, to say yae, they're worthy or not. what they're doing is getting people from inside and outside the white house to vet the people, and these people who are vetting may not have the same kind of experience as the aba. so it's just a cyclical process that's been going on. we have seen in this administration. >> the vetting, i mean, certainly, john avlon, the vetting appears to be a consistent issue here. >> yeah. and look, jeff and april are right. i mean, this is about ideology being elevated over experience. that's danger for a judiciary. it also, we're not talking about different kinds of experience. we're talking about no experience in being a judge for

a lifetime appointment. so if the key criteria for the white house counsel's office is ideology, that's great, but they're going so far as to nominate people with no judicial experience for lifetime federal judgeships. that should -- i mean, democrat, independent, republican, that should stop you in your tracks. that's a question of competence. >> these are lifetime -- we should remind our viewers. at the highest level, these are lifetime appointments. >> in fairness, if you look at the circuit court nominees, the intermediate appellate court nominees, many of them are very qualified. there are several supreme court law clerks, former supreme court law clerks. but again, ideology is paramount. i mean, they are all either clarence thomas or antonin scalia clerks. they're all uniform idealogically. that's what really is driving these appointments more than competence, more than experience, and it's been very successful. and remember, it also includes

neil gorsuch, who has the seat that was kept open by mitch mcconnell for almost a year. >> let me ask a question, jeffrey, on that point. if a democrat had been elected, would not the judicial appointments have been decided by a similar idealogical test, just from the other side of the spectrum? >> well, we have a very recent example of that. we have the barack obama presidency, which had almost half women nominees, very substantial numbers of racial minorities. but not idealogically as far left as these nominees are far right. i mean, you know, there is no question that sonia sotomayor and elena kagan are supporters of abortion rights, are supporters of gay rights, but you don't have the same kind of idealogical extremism on the left that you did have on the right. >> i want to ask you, because of course, the biggest judicial appointment is the supreme court

appointment of neil gorsuch. >> yes. >> and there was a "washington post" story today that the president considered pulling that appointment because during the confirmation process, gorsuch expressed some lack of comfort, one might say, with the president's criticism of judges on the bench. what do you know about that story? and is that in line with the president's loyalty test we have heard in other cases? >> most definitely, that loyalty test, even if you're in the seat, he likes to be able to say you're fired. he has that prerogative, but that happened, it happened a little after the process, after the confirmation process. when the president was testing some of the waters when it came to some of these statements by judges or orders by judges. this president likes to be able to say this person is in my corner. but when you -- it's almost like the justice department.

there should be a line between justice and the white house. and there's supposed to be a line between -- really, i mean, the checks and balances. there's supposed to be a line between the federal, the judicial -- well, the judiciary and the executive as well as on the hill. and the president is showing that he's kind of erasing that line. he's saying, look, if you don't lean towards my ideas, i'm going to pull you. but the line is no longer there. the president is reaching in. and he's sending that, he's throwing that veiled threat to neil gorsuch. we'll see how that plays out down the road. >> the president certainly hasn't kept his views private about the russian investigation, and mueller's investigation. john avlon, i want to ask you, the president did deny this "washington post" story, as he is want to do. he called it fake news. do you believe the president's denial? >> unfortunately, we're in a situation where we can't automatically take the president at his word. if there are multiple sources, there's probably some truth to

it. a president can be impulsive. we know he values loyalty. that comment gorsuch made was a little edgy for the current crop, where he said that it was disheartening to see the president target the judiciary. overall, it's evidence of a lot of what we have seen. an emphasis on ideology. sometimes at the expense of competence. we forget sometimes that the ideal of nonpartisanship in the judiciary itself has sort of been eclipsed by hyperpartisanship, and the extreme edge of that, it can bleed into rank and competence over lack of experience. >> quick final word before we go. >> just remember, the only justice that neil gorsuch voted with on all of his first 15 cases was clarence thomas, the most conservative member of the court. the conservative movement won a huge victory with the confirmation of neil gorsuch, and that's more important than donald trump's rages, because

neil gorsuch will be on the supreme court long after donald trump is gone from the white house. >> good point. jeff, john, and april, thanks for joining us. "outfront" next, we're learning more about that deadly train derailment, and hearing first-hand now from survivors. >> i looked out the front of the train where there should be another passenger car, and i just saw forest. and the former navy pilot who saw this ufo over the pacific and said, quote, it was not from this world. he'll be my guest.

your body was made for better things than rheumatiod arthritis. before you and your rheumatologist move to another treatment, ask if xeljanz xr is right for you. xeljanz xr is a once-daily pill for adults with moderate to severe ra for whom methotrexate did not work well. it can reduce pain, swelling and further joint damage, even without methotrexate. xeljanz xr can lower your ability to fight infections, including tuberculosis. serious, sometimes fatal infections, lymphoma and other cancers have happened. don't start xeljanz xr if you have an infection. tears in the stomach or intestines, low blood cell counts and higher liver tests and cholesterol levels have happened. your doctor should perform blood tests before you start and while taking xeljanz xr, and monitor certain liver tests. tell your doctor if you were in a region where fungal infections are common and if you have had tb, hepatitis b or c, or are prone to infections. xeljanz xr can reduce the symptoms of ra, even without methotrexate.

ask your rheumatologist about xeljanz xr.

double the speed limit. that's how fast an amtrak train was going when it crashed yesterday, causing 13 of 14 cars to derail. passengers onboard comparing the horrific crash to being inside an exploding bomb. the accident near seattle left at least three people dead, more than 100 injured. jason carroll is "outfront." >> investigators now in day two of trying to determine a cause behind the amtrak derailment. one sobering point already

clear. train 501 was traveling about 80 miles per hour as it rounded a curve and derailed. that's more than twice the posted 30-mile-per-hour speed limit. >> the brake was automatically activated rather than being initiated by the engineer. and that simply means that that's part of when there is an accident, the emergency brake system goes in place. it was not something that the engineer actually initiated himself. >> three people onboard the train were killed, including zach, his friend described him as a mass transit history enthusiast. many passengers wanted to be onboard for the train's inaugural run from seattle, through dupont, to portland. bob snyder was in car five. he remembers the moment it approached the overpass. >> 15 minutes or so, and then i noticed some what would feel like normal turbulence on an airplane, but for a train ride, it's unusual.

wasn't until i came to and i could get a sense of -- i looked out the front of the train where there should be another passenger car, and i just saw forest. >> snyder says he suffered only minor injuries. so, too, did charlie and beverly, both crawled their way to safety. >> after getting myself upright and my legs unfolded, i saw her legs, and i reached down and i shook one. and she shook it back. i said you all right? she said i think so. >> it was this body lying there. he had -- hardly had any clothes on. the clothes had been ripped off him. and he was obviously dead. >> dozens were injured as the train cars careened off the overpass and onto interstate 5, about 15 miles south of seattle. for years, some local community leaders have fought against amtrak using this stretch of railway in dupont. citing potential safety issues. recently, millions of dollars in

improvements were added to these tracks, including positive train control. technology that automatically slows down a speeding train but unfortunately was not activated. and jim, one of the major questions that investigators are trying to answer is whether or not the engineer was distracted before the accident. he wasn't the only one inside that cabin. there was also a conductor inside the cabin with him as well. they'll be looking to talk to both of those people to determine if they knew anything at all. they say they'll be conducting those interviews with them once those two have recovered from their injuries. they were also able to recover two cameras inside that cabin as well. those cameras were apparently badly damaged, according to ntsb, but they're hoping that will yield some information for them as well. jim. >> twice the speed limit. incredible. jason carroll on the scene. "outfront" next, close encounter with a possible ufo? the navy pilot who had one says

this mysterious craft outran his f-18 supersonic jet. he'll be my guest. and controversy at disney world. is that you, president trump? >> from the beginning, america has been a nation defined by its people. hts out of sync, keeping me from the things i love to do. talk to your doctor, and call 844-214-2424. i tabut with my back paines, i couldn't sleep and get up in time. then i found aleve pm. aleve pm is the only one to combine a safe sleep aid plus the 12 hour pain relieving strength of aleve. i'm back. aleve pm for a better am. (avo) but you also have a higher risk of heart attack or stroke. non-insulin victoza® lowers a1c, and now reduces cardiovascular risk. victoza® lowers my a1c and blood sugar

better than the leading branded pill. (avo) and for people with type 2 diabetes treating cardiovascular disease, victoza® is now approved to lower the risk of major cardiovascular events such as heart attack, stroke, or death. and while it isn't for weight loss, victoza® may help you lose some weight. (avo) victoza® is not for people with type 1 diabetes or diabetic ketoacidosis. do not take victoza® if you have a personal or family history of medullary thyroid cancer, multiple endocrine neoplasia syndrome type 2, or if you are allergic to victoza® or any of its ingredients. stop taking victoza® and get medical help right away if you get symptoms of a serious allergic reaction such as rash, swelling, difficulty breathing or swallowing. serious side effects may happen, including pancreatitis. so, stop taking victoza® and call your doctor right away if you have severe pain in your stomach area. tell your doctor your medical history. gallbladder problems have happened in some people. tell your doctor right away if you get symptoms. taking victoza® with a sulfonylurea or insulin may cause low blood sugar. common side effects are nausea, diarrhea, vomiting,

decreased appetite, indigestion, and constipation. side effects can lead to dehydration, which may cause kidney problems. ask your doctor about victoza®.

out front tonight, a stunning claim from the man who ran the defense department's multi-million dollar u.f.o. program. a top secret operation that was

for years, dedicated to, yes, investigating u.f.o. citings. erin spoke with him. when asked does he believe there is alien life out there, this was his response. >> my personal belief is there is very compelling evidence that we may not be alone. >> now this video you are seeing here is presented as possible evidence. it was captured by a u.s. navy fighter jet in 2004 off the coast of california. if you look closely, it appears to show a whitish oval object about the size of a commercial airplane hovering over the ocean. what is it exactly? "out front" now, retired u.s. navy pilot. thank you very much for joining us tonight. >> thanks, jim. thanks for having me. >> commander, you were in the cockpit there. explain to us what exactly you saw. >> yeah. when we -- there was two of us, two airplanes, four people. we had f-18s.

we had got vectored out to the west. when we arrived, the cruiser with the aegis system said it was merge plot which means they couldn't break us up. as we both looked out the right side of our airplane we saw a disturbance in the water and a white object oblong pointing north moving erratically left, right, north, south, up, down, all around. as we started clockwise flow around the disturbance watching it i decided that i would go lower and the other jet stayed high to observe both of us. as i got to about the 12:00 position the object started to mirror us. now we're both in a clockwise flow opposite circles. the object is lower than me, i'm above him and i'm looking at him with my eyes. we get all the way around the circle as i'm descending. there's a 2 to 3,000 foot

difference between us vertical. i'm at about the 8:00 position and the tick tack is about two 2. as i got close to it, probably within a mile to a half mile it rapidly accelerated to the south and disappeared in less than two seconds. so then we turn back around -- go ahead. >> go ahead. you're an experienced pilot. you've been up in the air a lot. i imagine you've seen a lot of things in the sky. what was it about the movement of this or the appearance of this that made you believe it wasn't from this world as opposed to something else? >> well, the first thing is it had no wings so you think, okay, it's a helicopter. there's no rotor wash in the water and no rotors. when helicopters move side to side they're slow. they pick up speed. this was extremely abrupt like a ping pong ball bouncing off the wall. it would go the other way and change directions at will.

the ability to hover over the water and go from 0 to 12,000 feet and accelerate in less than two seconds was something i have never seen in my life. >> i'm sure you've spoken to people. you've told the story to some people who react with skepticism, shake their heads a bit. >> yes. >> what do you say to people who doubt the encounter? >> it's easy to doubt what you can't explain. in this situation you're talking about four people, all eyeballs on ranging in experience from relatively new in a fleet squadron, which is bfa 41 to myself who had 16 years of flying and well over 3500 hours nonstop. so i would argue that it wasn't a weather balloon, it wasn't a flair, it was an actual object that we've tracked, we looked at somewhere for around five minutes before it rapidly accelerated. >> the defense department analyzed this video. did they take it seriously? did they come to any conclusion?

>> well, you can't really discern what it is until there's a couple of shots when it gets closer, there's a couple of objects coming out of the bottom. you can estimate how fast it leaves the sight of that screen on the width. you have to ask exactly based on the field of view what they would estimate that is, but when it leaves the screen on the video, it's moving pretty fast. >> commander -- >> that's from a stand still. >> thank you very much for joining us tonight. >> well, you're quite welcome. thank you. "out front" next, robots, donald trump. this in disney world's famous hall of the presidents, but why doesn't he look like the real thing? jeanne moos looks for answers. hey, man. oh! nice man cave! nacho? [ train whistle blows ] what?! -stop it! -mm-hmm. we've been saving a lot of money ever since we

switched to progressive. this bar is legit. and now we get an even bigger discount from bundling home and auto. i can get used to this. it might take a minute. -swing and a miss! -slam dunk! touchdown! together: sports! we're on a mission to show drip coffee drinkers, it's time to wake up to keurig. wakey! wakey! rise and shine! oh my gosh! how are you? well watch this. i pop that in there. press brew. that's it. so rich. i love it. that's why you should be a keurig man! full-bodied. are you sure you're describing the coffee and not me?

when you have a cold, full-bodied. stuff happens. ♪ { sneezing ] shut down cold symptoms fast [ coughing ] with maximum strength alka seltzer plus liquid gels.

wifiso if you can't live without it...t it. why aren't you using this guy? it makes your wifi awesomely fast. no... still nope. now we're talking! it gets you wifi here, here, and here. it even lets you take a time out. no! no! yes! yes, indeed. amazing speed, coverage and control. all with an xfi gateway. find your awesome, and change the way you wifi.

taking the stage tonight, a new likeness of president trump that couldn't be more unlike him. here's jeanne moos. >> reporter: george washington. >> throughout history. >> reporter: introduced donald trump to disney world's hall of presidents. >> three very simple words, we, the people. >> reporter: yeah, well, we, the people, all seem to be noticing the same thing best described in two words, john voigt, there is an uncanny resemblance to this trump supporter. >> he will save our america and he will certainly make it great again. >> reporter: read one tweet, congratulations for john voigt to being elected to disney's hall of presidents. to be fair, someone noted, every robot in the hall of presidents looks like they were designed by a guy who lost his glasses. from obama to bush, some imagined the other president's

reactions to president trump's presence. >> to stand here among so many great leaders of our past -- >> reporter: there is one other theory on why president trump doesn't quite look like himself. looks like disney world expected hillary to win. noted someone else, i'm not saying disney made a hillary robot and last minute changed it into trump clothes, but a petition with more than 15,000 signatures asked disney not to let trump's figure speak. it was ignored. the president recorded the audio at the white house. >> and that the best days of our great nation are still ahead of us. >> tweeted one critic, anyone that could hack into this and replace the audio with the "access hollywood" tape is a national hero. well, someone did dub in the "access hollywood" audio as well as sound from the trump/rubio dust up over hand sounds. >> he referred to my hands if they're small something else must be small. i guarantee you there's no problem, i guarantee you.

>> reporter: we can guarantee what lincoln would say. >> no men are created equal. >> reporter: but not all robots. >> look at those hands. are they small hands. >> reporter: jeanne moos, cnn, new york. thank you for joining us tonight. i'm jim sciutto in for erin burnett. the president says he is not going to see a dime from the tax bill he is about to sign. that may be true, but only if he keeps his eyes closed. john berman here in for anderson. the bill hit a minor lucy pulls the football technical snag but it's still on track for the senate to pass tonight and the house to pass a second time by tomorrow. based on what the president said in the past, he might be surprised with what is in it. >> this is going to cost me a fortune, this thing, believe me. believe me. this is not good for me. me, it's not -- i have some very wealthy friends. not so happy with me. >> many of the provisions