so when accused child molester loses an election, is the only plausible explanation really voter fraud? john berman in here for anderson. late today, the state of alabama made it official, certifying that roy moore lost the senate election there. doug jones won and he did it by more than 21,000 votes. a judge threw out a last-minute attempt by moore to block the proceedings. and there are some late news as well. a new statement from the moore team, this on top of a claim from moore that he took and passed a polygraph test on the

allegations against him. in all of this, though, the one thing he still hasn't done more than two weeks since election night is concede. joining us now from montgomery, alabama, cnn's diane gallagher. first off, diane, what's in the new statement from the moore team? >> i can tell you what's not in there, john. and that's an official concession. i want to give you just a little bit of a synopsis of what's in there a little bit here. he says, election fraud experts across the country have agreed that this was a fraudulent election. he then says, i have stood for the truth about god and the constitution for the people of alabama. i have no regrets. to god be the glory. >> a little bit of a clarification there, in his statement, by election experts across the country, you must assume that he means the three election experts that were quoted in his lawsuit. one of whom is a bit of a notorious conspiracy theorist, someone who peddles jfk assassination theorys and the dnc staffer seth rich's murder. also, you mentioned the

polygraph test that roy moore says he took after the election about those allegations. well, roy moore signed an affidavit saying that he took a polygraph test and passed, saying that he did not know those women and never had any sort of inappropriate sexual relationship with three of those accusers. well, the polygraph administrator didn't write in any of that and didn't sign any of that in that lawsuit. at least what's include there had. we have roy moore signing an affidavit that roy moore took a polygraph test and passed it. so there's still a lot of discrepancy in what roy moore has claimed in these things. but it does appear at least at this point, john, that roy moore is going to have to either just accept that he lost the election or look at some of his very small options he has if he wants to continue this. >> what are those options, diane? >> so, the one that would probably suit him best right now is also the one that would

probably bankrupt him. he has some time, it's 48 hours from the minute that they certified the election results to request a recount. the thing is, because he isn't within that half percent margin of victory, he would have to pay for this on his own. john, he'd have to put a deposit down and in talking with the secretary of state, he says that they can't really tell you how much it would cost, because of different parts of this. he may want a smaller recount. but if he needs a full statewide recount, we're talking in the seven figures here. and that doesn't appear to be money that roy moore has, at least in any of his fund-raising right now. >> all right, diane gallagher, thanks so much. let's find out what the moore team will do. joining us now is moore campaign spokeswom spokeswoman, janet porter. thank you so much for being with us. this afternoon, the state of alabama certified the election result results saying doug jones won. is it over? >> thanks, john, good to be with

you. i think the issue here we're looking at is the issue of voter fraud -- >> janet, let's talk about voter fraud in a second. i just want to know what you're doing. is the election over. has roy moore conceded. >> i'm talking with you. no, i think you just read his statement. and there are some options. i can tell you the option i'm recommending. i think he needs to file and run against governor ckay ivy who certified this fraudulent election. and those who joined together to ignore 84 pages of evidence and certify an election which has far too many questions about it to really affirm the wishes of the people of alabama and their right to a fair and free election. >> will he file for a recount in the next 48 hours? >> you're going -- i'm going to have to let the judge speak for himself. but i do say this. that what we're talking about here is far bigger than a united states senate race. we're talking about whether or not the people of alabama have the right and the privilege, the

duty to be able to have fair and free elections and make sure that they not only can cast their ballot but make sure their ballot is counted and have assurance that it was counted properly. that's what we don't have. >> the security certified the election results today. the judge threw out the lawsuit, citing those 84 pages that you provided there. did not think they were worthy to order some kind of halt to the proceedings. what due process have you not been given at this point? >> there's a few things that are problematic. one is that they dismissed it without -- i don't even know if the secretary of state read the 84 pages of evidence. and that's what really is screaming from the pages of this complaint. and what it said, let me finish, if i may -- >> it's not evidence. it's an argument citing four election experts, people you call election experts that a lot of people -- >> i know, and you're trying to say, maybe the guy got a c-minus in spelling in the fourth grade. you can discount anybody you

want. >> no, excuse me, he said the holocaust. he said the holocaust. one of them said the holocaust didn't happen. >> not true. by the way, that's not true. let me refer to you an internet blog, abraham lincoln's internet blog, don't believe you read everything on the internet. >> abraham lincoln was not alive for the holocaust, janet. >> he wasn't alive -- it was a joke. >> one of your experts tweeted that there's an evil jewish shadow government in the u.s. he claims it's preposterous to say that hitler wanted to kill all the jewish people. that is what -- >> don't believe everything you read. >> we have -- there's video. there's video of him saying this. >> may i respond? john, did you have me on to talk or to talk to me? >> here's what we know about john condit. he has nearly 40 years experience in the election machines. and what he found is this election system software is made up of a secret computer program in omaha, nebraska. and you heard from the secretary of state, i hope you ask him the question that wasn't asked earlier. that is, hey, if you guys don't keep the ballot images, why not?

because that's what federal law requires you to do. to have a record. to maintain that record. and make sure that it is not destroyed. if that is the case, what's happening is, is that the democrats in the state of alabama have said we want to preserve the evidence. we want to preserve the ballot images. and secretary of state john merrill said, no, we think we should destroy it. by the way, that's a federal crime -- >> janet -- >> -- that brings with it a sentence of $5,000 -- >> does it correspond you that your election machine expert, john condit jr., is a man who said there's an evil shadow jewish government, who claimed it's preposterous hitler -- >> he didn't say that. the guy's an expert, an undisputed expert -- >> janet, he absolutely said there's an evil shadow jewish government. >> i don't believe it. sorry. >> we will post -- >> and i want to say this and i've said it earlier that i don't think you're going to find -- >> we'll post the video, the

evidence. >> i don't know much about election machines. that's what john condit knows about. but i can tell you that you would be hard-pressed to find anybody who's more pro-israel. i celebrated when that embassy was moved to jerusalem -- >> he tweeted it and we have the tape. can we put the tape up? do we have the tweet we can put up? evil jews in the jewish shadow government must be highlighted, even though, of course, jews -- all joews are not in that. >> you know what you're not putting up on the screen, oddly enough. you're not putting his 39 years experience in election machines. but let's look at the other three experts who independent of each other said that the votes just in one county, just in jefferson county, people say, oh, that's racist, pointing to jefferson county. it was actually the republican precincts where the votes were moved from roy moore to doug jones and they can prove it. in fact, one of the experts with all of the degrees of -- >> prove what? i'm sorry. prove what. you say he can prove it. what can he prove? >> prove that in one county, 20

precincts in one county, the votes were moved from roy moore to doug jones -- >> that's not what he proved. have you read the 84 pages? >> i have read the argument -- >> he doesn't even begin -- he doesn't even begin to suggest that he has proven that those votes were moved. what he suggests -- >> what -- if you have read it -- >> is it's an anomaly. he says, he doesn't think that that voting pattern in that county, in that district, could possibly happen. he doesn't say that he has proof that those votes were changed. >> let me just tell you how much proof there is. it's in the affidavit, if you read it further, what you'll see is that there is a 1 in 15 billion chance that that occurred naturally. in other words, 1 in 15 billion mathematical chance that that was not fraud. >> his argument -- >> if you don't think that's proof, i think it's proof. >> his argument, essentially -- >> beyond any reasonable doubt. >> again, he does not make the case it's beyond any reasonable doubt. >> it's in there. i have the case in front of me. do you want me to quote it for you? >> his argument is too many

republicans did vote the party line in this district. you don't think republicans had a reason not to vote the party line in jefferson county? >> it's interesting when you look across the entire state, everybody follows a pattern in virtually every single precinct of every single county except the certain areas that were republican with high voter turnout for roy moore and suddenly, there's the pattern. you look at it on the charts. it's all mapped out and you can see it in the affidavit and the research that was submitted, something that the secretary of state, john merrill, ignored. but what it shows it, they reach a certain point, and boom, everything's off the charts. it does not follow any pattern of any of the rest of the state -- >> so we talked to election experts -- again, you cite four election experts. one of whom is a holocaust denier. we talked to two today, at least two, josh -- >> who's an expert on machines. >> you keep saying this man is an expert on machines. it doesn't bother you that he says there's an evil jewish shadow government -- >> of course it bothers me. >> that's the only election machine expert you could find is

one who says there's an evil shadow jewish government -- >> if i would have known that this was a tweet, if it really happened, i never would have suggested we use him. >> he also gives speeches and he has said that hitler doesn't -- it takes a google search. this is not extensive research. >> well, we worked christmas to put together all of the facts and 84 pages of them, so that we could make sure that this would be presented and not ignored. but unfortunately, it was ignored by secretary of state john merrill. you know, it's interesting. y'all have this assassinate the character. instead of looking at the evidence, you want to go after anybody that might have said something off, off the cuff or something that was inappropriate. and i'll be the first to say, it's completely inappropriate. i completely disagree, if that was, in fact said. >> doesn't it make you want to th think about -- maybe that guy doesn't have all his facts right on a few other things. >> well, maybe, let's through out john condit. let's forget about the voting

machines and the secret software program and the fact that they destroy all the evidence. that doesn't seem to bother you, but it bothers the people of alabama. and i believe the people of alabama are going to come out in a primary election against john merrill, a general election against hum, and i hope judge moore runs against her, personally. >> one of the things you have suggested, you haven't said whether or not he will test this election. if that might be news. again, i want to make clear, we have spoken to other election experts. they both analyzed the returns and they agreed that any claims of fraud or totally unfounded in regards to turnout anomalies, which is the basis of your voter fraud. hang on, levitt told us, quote, to attribute those anomalies to fraud without any further evidence of actual wrongdoing is nothing more than magical reasoning and conspiracy theory. there's just no there -- >> y'all love labels. this is your favorite thing to do. try to do a character assassination.

try to say that we give somebody that said something off the cuff -- >> you keep saying denying the holocaust is off the cuff -- >> no, it's not off the cuff. it's inappropriate. >> like, oh, i didn't like his hair that day. he's saying the holocaust didn't happen. >> listen to me, that's a bad thing. but let's throw out his 40 years of expertise in election machines. let's look at the other three experts. let's look at. the experts who have shown independent of each other -- by the way, with one of those experts was a democrat who said, i got involved in election integrity because he felt that bernie sanders was being -- that he was being cheated. look, this should matter to everyone. it's not about whether you like roy moore or not, or whether you like doug jones or not. it's about whether we have fair and free elections. i'm telling you one thing, the secretary of state john merrill was on the wrong side, not only today with certifying a fraudulent election, but he's been on the wrong side about destroying evidence of the vote, of the ballot images. this is a bad thing. >> we will ask him. look, it's 21,000 votes. it's 21,000 votes. we are going to talk to him --

>> which were in one county, by the way. >> we'll talk to him after we talk to you. we'll ask him if he destroyed evidence there. we'll ask him what he thinks. >> i'll tell you what he'll say. the machines don't really keep those. we have evidence in arizona with a lawsuit there that says that they actually can take that evidence. but look, federal law says you're supposed to keep all of the election evidence. he's destroying it. he's not saving it. and he's a guy that should be accountable for that. >> he voted for roy moore. he did vote for roy moore. let me ask you, finally, on the polygraph test. and again, judge moore signed an affidavit saying he took the test. will you provide the name of the polygraph provider? will you provide the questions? >> that's the thing, john, if there was a hearing, that's when that would have come out. if we would have -- judge hea harwick could have had a hearing, they would have said, yeah, let's present the evidence and look at the polygraph. by the way, with judge moore said not only did i do this

polygraph test, not only did i succeed in passing it, which is no shock to me, because i knew -- >> but we don't know what it is. we don't know what it is, because you won't give us the name -- >> because there was no hearing. if there was a hearing, you would have all found out and you all could have seen. >> what was he asked in the polygraph? >> what came out of it? i'll tell you the test results is that he did not know any of these women that made against these accusations against him and did not engage in any sexual misconduct. >> hang on -- >> the women who accused him of sexual misconduct. i'm not talking about teenagers he may have been family friends, i'm talking about the ones that made the allegations of sexual misconduct -- >> we do have a sound bite -- let's just play the sound we have. i think this is the interview with sean hannity when he talks about remembering at least one to have the girls. let's listen. >> i do recognize, however, the names of two of these young ladies, debbie wesson and gloria thacker, which they have -- that's their maiden name. i remember her as a good girl.

i seem to remember her as a good girl. >> so he remembers them -- >> by the way -- >> go ahead. >> well, they did not accuse him of any sexual misconduct. what debbie had to say is she said well, he was one of the nicest guys i've ever met. and when i got engaged, roy moore bought a gift and congratulatory note for my fiancee. i've had lots of ex-boyfriends that never gave my husband a wedding gift or a congratulatory note. he's a family friend and that's what shows that bears that out. >> but because he passed a polygraph test, you wanted the judge to throw out the election results? >> john, will let you me finish? i need to say this. it's important. y'all act like the forged yearbook was the holy grail. that we should look at this woman who forged a yearbook and admit shted she lied. that's evidence. >> there was a date -- >> let me finish. he passed the polygraph test and said, i will go before any polygraph that you as a state

organization choose. he will go and he will be tested. but you don't see that from the accusers. >> janet, we're unfortunately running out of time. because i want to talk to the secretary of state after the break. but finally will be doug jones be the next senator from alabama? >> i think that that may be the case. but i do know the secretary of state john merrill, that his days are limited and that if the people of alabama want fair and free elections, i know of at least 650,000 people who do not like the fact that he wants to destroy evidence and certify a fraudulent election, according to 84 pages and affidavits of experts from around the country. >> janet porter, thank you for coming on and making your case. appreciate it. >> thank you. >> all right, alabama secretary of state john merrill, you heard him talked about quite a bit there. he joins us next. and just ahead, new information about the truck that shielded our view of the president on the golf course. we found one that's identical. where we found it might surprise you. so will the answer we got when we asked about it. also, a new presidential tweet that is sure to spark controversy. stay with us.

♪ ♪ give a little bit ♪ ♪ give a little bit... -hello. ♪ give a little bit... ♪ ... of your love to me oh, haha. ♪ there's so much that we need to share ♪ ♪ so send a smile and show that you care ♪ ♪ i'll give a little bit of my love to you ♪

baefore the break, you hear roy moore's spokesperson put a lot of allegations out there. our next guest heard the complaints, looked at the facts and today certified that doug jones won there. joining us now, alabama secretary of state, john merrill. mr. secretary, thank you so much for being with us. just first off, we just had janet porter on from the moore campaign. she said there was systemic fraud in the election, did you see any? >> no, john. and we've had a number of

allegations that have been introduced to us for us to consider. as of this afternoon, we had 118 had been introduced to our office. 85 of those had been fully adjudicated. that only leaves a remaining 33 to still be considered. two of those are from out of state and 31 of them are from our state. and we continue to investigate those. >> she said you have destroyed evidence. is that the case? >> that's absolutely not the case. it's the farthest thing from the case. as a matter of fact, we keep our ballots, the original ballots that our people cast their vote on for a period of up to 22 months, as is required by state and federal law. as far as the digital images that she continued to rattle on about, the thing that was so interesting to me is, our machines are not even capturing those images. they're not preserved. so they're not available for someone to review, because they're not even captured. and if they're not captured, they don't exist. and if they don't exist, you can't use them. so those are not there for us to review or to use.

>> jefferson county, she keeps on saying that there are these anomalies there in voting patterns. do you see any anomalies that raise questions to you? >> well, the biggest anomaly to me is that judge moore lost by 83,000 votes in jefferson county. now, i will tell you that one of the most outstanding efforts that we were aware of that was put together by the republican party in the state of alabama had to do with the jefferson county republican party, who made it an effort to ensure that each and every polling site in the county was properly reviewed and properly noted with watchers and workers at each location to ensure that voter fraud did not occ occur. what actually happened, according to them, was historic numbers, as far as turnout was concerned. with democrats coming out of the wood work to make sure that that they cast their ballot for their candidate, doug jones. >> one of the others things that janet porter said is that she hopes that maybe roy moore runs against kay ivy, the governor,

and that someone runs and equ y defeats you in upcoming elections, sir. your response to that? >> right. and i'm sure that she does. and the people of alabama will determine my political future and they'll determine what kind of candidate, if any, qualifies against me and what kind of support they would provide that candidate. this is the thing i think that needs to be done. as far as election integrity is concerned, we had one goal in our office when this campaign started. that was to ensure that integrity and credibility were at the forefront of this election. i don't think there's anybody, anywhere in the united states that has looked at this race with an objective eye that can say that anything other than a race with character, integrity, and credibility occurred in the state of alabama. we're very excited about that. but when it comes to investigating voter fraud, we've already had six convictions in the area of voter fraud since i've been the secretary of state. it's been more than a decade since one had occurred before we took office. and we've had three elections

that have been overturned. so, we want everybody in our state to vote, but just one time. we want to make it easy to vote and hard to cheat in alabama. >> mr. secretary of state, thanks so much for being with us. appreciate it. >> thank you for having me as your guest. all right, next the president golfs and tweets. plus, some answers to a mystery surrounding some of the golfing.

the president made news today tweeting and played golf after tweeting for a third straight day that it was time for him to get back to work. today we did catch it on camera, unlike yesterday when a big white truck showed up to block our view, moving wherever we did. the secret service denied responsibility for it, so did the palm beach sheriff's office, which is where we saw a big white truck parked today, parked in a such a way that prevented us from comparing license plates. a spokeswoman told us the truck maneuver was not authorized by management of the detail of the sheriff's office. there's this, as well. the truck yesterday, wherever it was from and whoever did or did not authorize it, was at the golf course in a spot that only sheriff's department vehicles had parked in previously.

but this was not the only pressure news today. ryan nobles in west palm beach, florida, which is warm, unlike where i am, which is not, which is actually where the president made news, ryan. >> reporter: yeah, that's right, john. and i should say that it has cooled off to a very brisk 72 degrees here in west palm beach tonight. and that ocean air is a little bit chilly tonight. but we're finding a way to manage. meanwhile, the president talking about those cold temperatures in the northeast, tweeting about an hour ago. quote, in the east, it could be the coldest new year's eve on record. perhaps we could use a little bit of that good old global warming that our country but not other countries is going to pay trillions of dollars to protect against. bundle up. now, the white house not offering us any context to this tweet. we assume it's the president talking about the united states' decision to pull out of the paris climate accord. not 100% sure about the scientific accuracy of the president's tweet here tonight, comparing global warming to those cold temperatures in the northeast, but this is the

president again taking on another controversial issue and doing it through his twitter feed, john. >> scientists will flat-out tell you that's not how dplrglobal warming works, but that aside, the president made a lot of other news today, specifically on north korea. what can you tell us about that. >> reporter: that's right, john, he's talking very tough about china's role as it relates to the situation in north korea and put out a very strong misive against the choouinese governme saying they've been caught red-handed. we don't know what prompted this tweet from the president today and the white house offering us no information to that effort. we know there have been reports out of south korea that were unconfirmed where satellite images have picked up vessels in what appears to be the transfer of oil. at the very least, this shows that this white house is going to continue to make this a very important part of their foreign policy going into the new year, and that the role china plays is going to be very important. >> all right, we'll talk more about that in a little bit. ryan nobles down in florida. thanks so much.

let's get more now from reporters who cover the white house. michael shere of "the new york time times", josh doszy, nanny carney of politico. i want to shift gears a little bit, you just posted a story, josh, on changes that could be coming to the white house. the long and short of this is the political operation could be changing in the face of the midterms. what do you know? >> there's a lot of frustration inside the white house about the political operation after defeats in virginia and particularly in alabama. the stinging setback of having a democrat win in alabama. and there's a sense that they need more firepower for the election. you have a president whose approval ratings are often below 40%. republican party, while it just got significant tax reform passed, has been slack on kplich accomplishments for the year and concern about the landscape and how many seats they could lose. over the holidays, you have chief of staff john kelly and others thinking about making some changes ahead of a

potentially important and problematic year for the white house. >> everyone knows that there's been a ton of departures from the white house. "the wall street journal" had an article today saying it was an historic level of departures from the white house today. are there fault lines within the west wing that you're hearing about, that haven't been mended? >> there's still a lot of questions about who else will leave, other than the people who have announced they'll leave in 2018. people are wondering what gary cohn, trump's top economic adviser, is going to do. he's actually become pretty popular again. people don't want him to leave. and he would take with him probably like a lot of the top people at the nec that he's brought in. that's a big question mark. what i'm hearing from the west wing is people still think tillerson will leave in february, but that's also a big question mark. no one knows, really. and more shake up will happen as they figure out exactly who's going to man their political shop. what the -- what that's going to look like. so people are bracing themselves for more departures to come.

>> bracing themselves for more, michael. there's a sense that the chief of staff, john kelly, has made things perhaps more calm. you know, since the summer oa little bit. is that likely to linger? is that what is being felt right now down in florida? is this the calm over plmar-a-lo right now? >> well, look, i think one of the things that we've all learned over a very long and chaotic year is that while the sort of apparatus around president trump, the people who he surrounds himself, the structures and procedures that he puts in place can either be more or less chaotic, at the end of the day, and today is not a bad example, what really drives policy, what really drives politics in this white house is mr. trump himself. it's what he says, it's his twitter feed, and it's the sort of unpredictable nature that he likes to foster, both in sort of internal relations inside the white house as well as policy

and keeping adversaries and allies alike on edge. so as much as i think there might be a new cast of characters, i'm sort of skeptical as to whether or not we're going to see any sort of significant shift or change in the dynamics of this white house next year. >> you know, josh, it is interesting. michael was just talking about sort of the statements that were made today. the most recent is the president's statement on twitter about global warming. after he pulled the u.s. out of the paris climate accords, everyone in the white house pressed and pressed and pressed, mr. president, do you believe in global warming. they would ask the press secretary, do you believe in global warming right now? well, you know, if you're going to read this statement that the president made tonight, he certainly doesn't seem to believe in global warming. at least not as far as i can tell. >> right. and that's what his comments tonight, are pretty inkrecendia among many, but many of his supporters probably don't believe in global warming either. he's speaking directly to

millions of americans who probably voted for him and share some of those views. we've seen time and time again, the white house tries to manage president trump and even, you know, before he went to mar-a-lago, there was an effort to not have a press secretary, to try to just ride the momentum of a tax legislation and then, you know, he gets down to florida, he's largely unstaffed, he, you know, is playing golf, he's talking to his friends, and he begins tweeting what he wants. he sees something on fox news, sees something on cnn or another network and he responds immediately. i think their efforts to try to ameliorate some of those correspondence about his free-wheeling nature and his ability to make off-topic news cycles they don't want was shown today. it's largely impossible, just as his tweet tonight shows. >> these tweets anre the press secretary in some ways he didn't have. we don't have time to analyze word for word this bizarre statement he made about "vanity fair" and ana wna wintour and

retractions they made about hillary clinton. but this goes to show his continuing obsession with both hillary clinton and to a certain extent, told magazine world. >> that's right. this is vintage trump, talking about "vanity fair," even though his nemesis is no longer there. this felt like old-school trump in palm beach, unstaffed. but one thing about the global warming tweet, it reminded me a little bit, you know, he's talking about good global warming here. it's like when he talks about a good government shutdown. there's sympathetic to him like taking what people see as a negative thing and saying, like, maybe there's a good side of this. but this is trump, just on his own. john kelly is not with him. most of his -- the family's there and that's it. >> michael, to that point. what do you think is happening right now down at mar-a-lago? what do the next days? what portends for the next days? >> well, look, i mean, i think the administration is trying to set an agenda for the beginning of the year. you've heard the president talk a little bit about

infrastructure. there's some sense and some optimism in parts of the white house and the west wing that that might be a way to kind of ride the wave of the tax success and get another legislative effort going and one that might actually work with some democrats. but lack, you know, what's also going on at mar-a-lago is that he's going to lunch. he's seeing all his friends who come in and out of the club or in and out of the golf club. and that kind of free wheeling exchange of information is what he's been used to for almost 72 years of his life. and that's what undermines the sense of discipline that the white house tries to impose and ultimately, that's where, you know, a tweet about global warming comes from. >> michael shere, josh dawsey, annie karni, thanks so much. (bruce) we started talking about the service. i outrank him.

(chris) [laughs] yeah. meals on wheels reaches so many people. it's impactful beyond anything i've ever done in my life. (bruce) the meals and his friendship really mean, means a lot to me. (vo) through the subaru share the love event, we've helped deliver over one-point- seven million meals to those in need. get zero percent financing for 63 months on select models, plus we'll donate two hundred and fifty dollars to charity.

not in this house. 'cause that's no average family. that's your family. which is why you didn't grab just any cheese. you picked up kraft mozzarella with a touch of philadelphia for lasanyeah! kraft. family greatly. when you have something you love, ♪ you want to protect it. at legalzoom, our network of attorneys can help you every step of the way. with an estate plan including wills or a living trust that grows along with you and your family. legalzoom. where life meets legal.

the president's boast yesterday of signing more bills since any president since truman is false.

there's no disputing he's looking for a big 2018. he'll be getting together with congressional leaders next month at camp david and one of the items on the agenda is infrastructure. if that's the case, one democrat might be onboard. debbie dingel. congressman dingel joins us right now. thank you so much for being with us. you say you are willing to work with the president on infrastructure. what does that look like? infrastructure is complicated. you know, there's a debate about whether it should be the private sector or public funding. we know the president tends to favor the private sector here, so where is there room for agreement? >> well, i think one, public/private sector agreements, we're going to have to commit to making a significant investment and determine how we're going to pay for it. it's going to take a minimum of $1 trillion, but we've had studies that will show it's going to take a couple of trillion dollars. let's talk about what we're talking about. we're talking about bridges and roads. and by the way, we don't have

republican or democratic potholes. but let's look at flint, michigan. do you know how many cities across the country and little towns have an aging infrastructure on water delivery? that's a crisis. we've got children with lead poisoning across the country. we need to do something about it. if we're going to be competitive, we need to do something about broadband. two years ago, it was said that amtrak needs to install this keep trains safe hardware, which wasn't done and could have prevented deaths last week with amtrak. we need to -- we don't have a choice. and i think there's a lot of democrats that are willing to work together with republicans, because we need to dleliver for our countries. >> there are democrats who look at this and say, you know, we shouldn't be in a rush to give the president a legislative victory on anything. what do you say to them? >> i don't agree with them piches ele. i was elected to take care of the working men and women of all of the men and women in our district. i'll give you an example of something that we desperately

need to deliver on, which is pension legislation. i have one of the largest groups of central pension fund retirees in my district. these are men and women who put in an entire lifetime into a pension fund. we're told it was safe and now in their retirement, they're scared to death? i had one commit suicide. hey, this isn't -- these aren't games we're playing. we've got to deliver for americans in this country. if he does something that's wrong, like attack somebody based on their religion, like he has on muslims, i also have the largest population of muslims in this country, in my district. i will fight him tooth and nail. he's met a buzz saw like he'll never see. but i think we've got to deliver on some of these things from our constituents. >> so just to use an example from the last hour, let's say. he wrote on twitter about global warming, basically suggesting that the cold temperatures in the northeast that we're feeling right now, you know, prove that global warming doesn't exist. not in those words exactly, but that's the gist of what he's writing right there. is this someone you feel like

you can deal with on other issues? >> we've got no choice. we can't say, i don't like somebody -- i mean, i can find substance and will. we need to remind him that what global warming is doing is causing very severe weather patterns. so ie, you get these kind of freezing temperatures that we're seeing across the country, 17 below in michigan. but it's not just working with the president. we're working with the administration, his cabinet, and we're working with the house and the senate. and i do believe that we've got a responsibility to deliver on infrastructure for this country. and on pensions. in a number of other issues. it's not about messaging. it's about delivering for the american people. and i think part of last area's election was the american people are tired of the partisan bickering. they want to see us get something done. and i think what you saw in last area's election, and you're still going to see this november is anger and anger at everyone who's not caring about them and

delivering for them. >> there are no republican orpo. have a happy new year, congresswoman debbie dingel. next up, an op-ed sparks outrage from russia including claims of fake news. what the secretary wrote that angered them, that's next. you might take something for your heart... or joints. but do you take something for your brain. with an ingredient originally found in jellyfish, prevagen is the number one selling brain-health supplement in drug stores nationwide. prevagen. the name to remember. for her compassion and care. he spent decades fighting to give families a second chance. but to help others, they first had to protect themselves. i have afib. even for a nurse, it's complicated... and it puts me at higher risk of stroke. that would be devastating.

i had to learn all i could to help protect myself. once i got the facts, my doctor and i chose xarelto®. xarelto®... to help keep me protected. once-daily xarelto®, a latest-generation blood thinner... ...significantly lowers the risk of stroke in people with afib not caused by a heart valve problem. it has similar effectiveness to warfarin. xarelto® works differently. warfarin interferes with at least 6 blood-clotting factors. xarelto® is selective, targeting just one critical factor interacting with less of your body's natural blood-clotting function. for afib patients well-managed on warfarin, there is limited information on how xarelto® compares in reducing the risk of stroke. don't stop taking xarelto® without talking to your doctor, as this may increase risk of stroke. while taking, you may bruise more easily, or take longer for bleeding to stop. it may increase your risk of bleeding if you take certain medicines. xarelto® can cause serious, and in rare cases, fatal bleeding. get help right away for unexpected bleeding, unusual bruising, or tingling. if you've had spinal anesthesia, watch for back pain or any nerve or muscle-related signs or symptoms. do not take xarelto® if you have an artificial heart valve

or abnormal bleeding. tell your doctor before all planned medical or dental procedures... ...and before starting xarelto®-about any conditions, such as kidney, liver, or bleeding problems. it's important to learn all you can... ...to help protect yourself from a stroke. talk to your doctor about xarelto®. there's more to know™. i enjoy the fresher things in life.o. fresh towels. fresh soaps. and of course, tripadvisor's freshest, lowest... ...prices. so if you're anything like me... ...you'll want to check tripadvisor. we now instantly compare prices... ...from over 200 booking sites... ...to find you the lowest price... ...on the hotel you want. go on, try something fresh. tripadvisor. the latest reviews. the lowest prices.

more claims of fake news, not from the white house, but from russia. russia's foreign ministry spokeswoman used the phrase to dismiss a "new york times" op-ed from secretary of state rex tillerson. she also called it confrontational. amid speculation that tillerson may be on the way out of the state department, the piece read to some as a defense of his legacy, including his handling of north korea. joining us now, with cnn global affairs analyst kimberly dozier and former u.s. ambassador to

russia, thomas pickerling. kimberly, the first question a lot of people wondered when they read this, is the secretary defending his legacy, a legacy that he wants to continue or is he sort of writing his own ob obituary here? >> i think he's saying, i'm here to stay, i'm not going anywhere. and he's also messaging to future possible voters for the gop in the midterms, that the centrist republicans, the adults are in charge. the kind of policies he articulated match those in the national security strategy put out by h.r. mcmaster's white house nsc last week, that they're going to be tough on russia and tough on north korea, tough on china. messages that you don't always see coming from president trump. when you see teleprompter trump, he says the right things about russia. but when he speaks off the cuff, he's a lot warmer. >> ambassador, what's your take on this? >> i think kimberly's probably

right here. y he never really wanted to go. there are some rumors around that he'll go after some tax benefits appear on his account. but i don't know how to take those. and it's more or less a guess at this stage as to whether or not he will or not. it's perfectly reasonable for a secretary of state at the end of his first year, as he's there, to add up the pieces. i'm not sure they match what tillerson said in the past. on things like north korea, he was for negotiations without preconditions. on the russia piece, he's not in sync with the president. this may be, in a sense, the axis of adults, madison, kelly and tillerson, talking over the president and beyond the president. and it's important, i think here, that playing tough with russia and making the statement, which i think is probably true, that we haven't had a worse period in u.s./russian

relationships for a long time, all make sense. what else he has saed said thera little bit of a reach, a little bit of what we would all call trying to find a way to brush up a pretty, i think, moth-eaten policy at the moment. and not much of it comes through as real accomplishments, things he's going to do, things he would hope to do. things he would like to do that the president doesn't agree with, are all very up in the op-ed. >> he cites russian election meddling as a fact there, which puts him at odds with the tone coming from the president. kimber kimberly, a little news on north korea and china. the president wrote of china, caught red-handed, very disappointed that china is allowing oil to go to north korea. there will never be a friendly solution to the north korea problem if this continues to happen. how did you interpret that? >> well, look, this is another

chance for president trump to give beijing a hard time, to say, are you not doing enough to maneuver pyongyang toward denuclearization. but he did it in a very odd way in that he is citing a newspaper report from south korea that quotes anonymous sources. it's completely uncorroborated. so that's very easy for beijing to dismiss. >> thank you so much for being with us. we appreciate it. we do have breaking news, a new piece in the "new york times." they spoke to president trump today him he had new words about the russia investigation. we'll have much more when we we'll have much more when we come back.when you retire? uhh, i was thinking around 70. alright, and before that? mean after that? no, i'm talking before that. do you have things you want to do before you retire? oh yeah sure... ok, like what? but i thought we were supposed to be talking about investing for retirement? we're absolutely doing that. but there's no law you can't make the most of today. what do you want to do? i'd really like to run with the bulls. wow. yea. hope you're fast. i am. get a portfolio that works for you now

and as your needs change. investment management services from td ameritrade. when we set out to make new banquet mega bowls, we didn't tread lightly. we jam packed 'em full of hardy goodness, like majestic piles of cheddar mac 'n cheese smothered in shredded mozzarella. sounds pretty good, huh? but it wasn't mega. so we took big, tender chunks of chicken. slathered them in spicy buffalo sauce. stacked them on top for a whopping 31 grams of protein and said... "yep". now that's mega.

all right. it turns out michael schmidt had something up his sleeve, in the "new york times," it just hit, an interview with the president. the president says he believes special counsel robert mueller can be fair. that is different than what some republicans are saying. i want to quote from the piece right here. the president did not demand an end to the russia investigation swirling around his administration. but insisted 16 times there's been no collusion discovered by the inquiry. it makes the country look very bad, the president said, and it puts the country in a very bad position. michael scherrer, thank you so much for being with us. i just crammed the article during the break. you helped write up the article here the headline here is he

believes that the special counsel can be fair. explain. >> yeah, look, that was the most striking part of what was more than a 30-minute interview that mike schmidt, my colleague, got down at the president's golf club down in west palm beach. but it really stood out, right. because we have been watching over the last several weeks as the republican party has tried to discredit the mueller investigation seizing on these texts people have been reporting about, that were sort of anti-trump texts by one of his investigators. there has been an effort by the republican party to undermine the credibility of the mueller investigation. so to have the president come out in this conversation with mike and say, look, i believe he can be fair, that was pretty striking. though, he went on to make some comments about how he can do whatever he wants to, with the justice department, even though she not taking any action now. >> explain that. i have that quote underlined. i have absolutely every right to do what i want with the justice

department. what was he getting at there? >> well, it's a little unclear. mike and i talked about it before. the specific question he was asked about his power over the justice department related to the hillary clinton e-mails, and the past e-mails investigation. but when he answered the question, he seemed to seize on this question of fairness and said, look, i can do whatever i want with the justice department. but as long as it's fair to me, i'm not going to take any action, which seemed to refer to the previous conversation about, excuse me, fairness in mueller. so, you know, it appears what he was basically saying is i have decide to be hands-off for now. but i have the power to take some action if i wanted to. >> my initial scan on this, number one, paul manafort, i barely knew him. he was the campaign chairman. and then, number two, to

continue to bash jeff sessions and suggest that the attorney general didn't have his back political politically. >> yeah. that was striking, as well. he talked about democrats and was very angry actually about the fact that democrats, in his words, hadn't negotiated on any of the tax legislation and hadn't been bipartisan partners, even though they claimed they wanted to be. he also was his typical sort of bragging self. at one point saying that the criticism that he doesn't know the details about the legislation that he's, you know, that is being worked out is unfair and he knows more about the tax legislation and the details than any cpa ever would. >> we have 20 seconds left here, michael. one of the headlines seems to be, didn't come across about nervous about the special counsel's investigation? >> no, he didn't. the sort of sense that mike asked him if he was concerned about the timing.

he said, no, i'm not concerned about the timing, other than he said that he felt like the country would be harmed by an investigation that continued for a long time. >> thank you for coming back. i commend your poker face in the first segment. not letting us know this was going on. >> sorry about my voice. >> it's great. >> appreciate it. that's all for me, i'm john berman. the cnn special report, "all the best, all the worst 2017" begins right now. the following is a cnn special report. >> from the outer limits of a world unlike any ever known comes a spine-tingling, hair-raising, bone-chilling tale of horrifying headlines, political intrigues, mayhem, majesty, music and more, with an all-star cast, including sports analyst brian jones. >> run, run, they're coming.