>> he said these hate-filled things and he said them repeatedly. >> plus, more republicans call it quits. convinced 2018 will end with a giant anti-trump wave. >> welcome back to the studio. nice to have you. >> and a big flip. the president won't promise to say yes if the russia special counsel asks for an interview. >> we'll see what happens. when there's no collusion and nobody's found any collusion at any level, it seems unlikely that you'd even have an interview. "inside politics," the biggest stories sourced by the best reporters, now. welcome to "inside politics." i'm john king. to our viewer s in the united states and around the world, thank you for sharing your sunday. president trump just days away now from marking one day in office. the latest reviews are abysmal. the new storm, global disgust at disparaging remarks about haitians and africans that are being labeled vile and worse.

>> the words and his action tend to speak like one who knows something about being a racist. it must be in liz dna, in his makeup, but it's frightening to have someone in the office of the president in 2018 speaking the way that he's speaking. >> the political fallout, tougher sledding for an important immigration deal and deepening republican worries that the president is leading his party into a midterm election disaster. >> first thing that came to my mind was, very unfortunate, unhelpful. >> plus, among several shifts and flips this past week, this. why is the president suddenly suggesting he might not be willing to answer questions in the russia meddling

investigation? >> we'll see what happens. i mean, certainly, i'll see what happens. but, when they have no collusion and nobody has found any collusion at any level, it seems unlikely that you'd even have an interview. >> with us this sunday to share their reporting and their insights, julie pace of the associated press, michael bender of "the wall street journal," cnn's manu raju, and margaret a talif of bloomberg news. don't hold your breath waiting for donald trump to apologize. he tells friends that the media made too much of the fact of his words. we'll try not to repeat his term here this morning. several of his weekend tweets were efforts to change the subject. but one, just two words, "america first" reminds us, this president's first reflex is to curry favor with his anti-immigration, nationalist base. his image of america first, we learned much more clearly in recent days, is an america that

welcomes white immigrants from norway, but not black immigrants or brown immigrants from places the president clearly think produce subpar humans. >> in the course of his comments, said things which were hate filled, vile, and racist. he said, haitians, do we need more haitians. and then he went on, when we started to describe the immigration from africa that was being protected in this bipartisan measure, that's when he used these vile and vulgar comments, calling the nations they come from shitholes, the exact word used by the president, not more, not just once, but repeatedly. >> now, there are significant first-year achievements the president could be celebrating this week. and there are significant governing challenges here and now, including the fact the government runs out of money friday, without a new spending plan. instead, another mess of the president's own making. here's "time" magazine's take.

the president and a presidency on fire. perfect, as well, is "the new yorker's" take, at the very moment his party's grip on power depends on mr. trump improving his image, the president is d digging the hole deeper. we talk often about how this is a transactional presidency. that the president can move his position on issues, move which fight he chooses to pick from day to day welco day to day, if not hour to hour. what is the price for this? you see the global condemnation. does he get it? >> i don't know if he gets the scope of it. his instinct tends to be to dig in, even when he sees everyone around him running away. but i think that there are a couple of potential casualties for him here. one, he puts his party once again in the position of having to defend, make a choice, to defend or to walk away from pretty indefensible comments. and it puts them in a position of not being able to do things like talk about the tax reform bill, which is what they leaned on, all through last year. every time one of these moments would come up, you would have

paul ryan, mitch mcconnell say, but at least the president will sign our agenda. well, now he's done that and they're still having to answer for him. i think that it also has ripped open a real debate in 2018 about whether the president of the united states is a racist. that is a real and frankly legitimate question to be asking. and again, it's quite jarring to be having that conversation in 2018. >> and we've seen this time and time again. his instinct is to disparage non-whites. his instinct is to disparage immigrants. and the white house is not -- what can they say? what have they said? nothing. >> the initial reaction from the white house is that this would help with the base. >> that's additionally reps r l reprehensible. >> right. and i think what you were saying before and what julie is saying is that it may help with the base. it's certainly not going to expand it. and in an election year, in a m midterm election year, this is really important. and there are republican consultants that are trying to get this message to trump, to the white house. independents increasingly look

like republicans this year. the base is with trump. the base will be with trump, whatever wall he decides on. whatever president trump tells his base is the wall, that will be the wall. and if -- and republicans are trying to tell him, if you would just moderate this language a little bit, if you would stop turning off these independents just a little bit, we might actually have a fighting chance in these midterms. but with this kind of behavior, with this sort of language, it digs the party deeper in a year that they need some real help from the president. >> and the president gets mad, he thinks he deserves more credit for the economy. he's hoping to sell the -- forget the president, but the republicans are desperate to sell their tax cut plan. but if you look at the statistics, the numbers about the president are all going in the wrong detectiirection. 69% of americans say he's not levelheaded. that's up 12 points since november 2016. 63%, not august. up 11 points. 59%, doesn't have good leadership skills.

59%, doesn't care about average americans, up 14 points in the past year. so the president's heading in the wrong direction. that's before these comments, which, i'm sorry, there is no other way to process this, as the debate about whether the president of the united states, who's supposed to be setting an example, is racist or a race baiter or just has a horrible dark reflex. >> this is a real low point for the country and a real low point for the presidency. there also are, as i see it, two political implications. one is domestically, it's certain to motivate democratic turnout and to depress republican turnout in a really crucial midterm year, but there are also foreign policy implications, because they're on the scale of haiti to norway, there are a whole lot of countries closer to the haiti scale in terms of economic well-being or that sort of thing. that the u.s. is relying on right now to make a number of deals and arrangements work. whether it involves information on terrorism sharing, whether it involves pathways, literally,

across, you know, national lines on terrorism policy, and foreign policy. and all of this stuff comes into play, the sort of geopolitical implications of this much less just the relationship with the allies. i mean, the trip to dpland and the uk has been canceled. the relationship with western european allies is further complicated by this. and there are a lot of countries in africa and in the middle east that are furious and humiliated and so angry at what he said. and are perhaps willing to even give up some u.s. aid and turn other countries. >> tyou get so busy, you don't pause and say, wait a minute. and one of the other things, you heard the speaker ryan at the top of the program. he said unhelpful, very unfortunate. a lot of people think when the president of the united states says things like this, the reaction from the other leaders in the republican party should

be more forceful. among those, let's give credit where the rare occasion where credit is due. senator roy blunt of the state of missouri, listen here. he was asked about what the president said and he calls it straight. >> it's not acceptable view of the world. and it's not an acceptable thing to say. one of the big problems, i think, in the country today, generally, is there are, there's almost no filter on anybody and you would expect the president to lead in determining how you filter your thoughts, rather than to continue to say things that take a lot of away from what's actually getting done. >> very rare statement there. that could have even been stronger. but at least he calls it as it is, that it's unacceptable, it's a bad world view, and it hurts. >> yeah, and look who we have also not heard from, senate majority leader mitch mcconnell yet. and paul ryan did speak out, but it was a day afterwards, when he was asked. he did not issue a paper statement, criticizing the

president. this came, remember, the story broke as lawmakers were leaving town. so republicans in a lot of ways wanted to avoid answering questions about this. really, to me, it just -- one, it's example 5 million of trump saying something and putting his party in an awful, awful political position. but it also is emblematic of how the party just does not know how to grapple with a president who like this says things that are just mind boggling and -- but they have supporters back home who are fervent trump supporters. they don't want to anger their base. they don't want to anger the presiden president, who they do need to cut deals on big issues and get his support on things. they don't want to be on the other side of a twitter storm. they don't want the president to remember them if he goes after them in this situation. >> i get that when it comes to a comment that they think is too much, a policy issue where he's moving toe ining to the left, oe other issues. this is a defining test question

of character. >> and the question is going to be -- >> and when we come back this week, the members are going to have to answer the questions. >> i think it's important to note here, this isn't just a tweet. this isn't just something that the president said at a rally. he's talking about this in terms of shaping u.s. immigration policy. i think republicans have to be held accountable for answering for this. do they believe that the united states should take more people from countries like norway as opposed to countries in africa? if this is a policy challenge that he laid out there in a pretty vulgar way. >> you can have a conversation about merit-based immigration. that you have, you know, these are the jobs we need filled. these are the challenges of our economy. these are the needs of our economy. and the people with those talents, whatever they look like, whatever the color of their skin, wherever they come from, get to the head of the line. the second you mention a country to label it and i grew up in a city that was having race issues at the time. when you use certain words, you know -- we knew what people were saying. he's not saying we don't want them because they don't have the skills, he's saying, we don't want them because of what they look like and that's a different

conversation. >> yeah, it definitely is. and there are -- this is, this is where the rubber hits the road here. there is one thing about trump talking different and instilled himself politically as someone who's not going to be constrained by political correctness. but when the rubber hits the road here, when it's time to make policy decisions, is this sort of viewpoint going to dominate, you know, the republican position on one of the major issues they're facing right now? >> growing up, presidents are supposed to set example. midterms elections are historically driven by one thing, the president's poll standing. it's no wonder so many republicans are calling it quits. the morning walk was so peaceful.

until... it... wasn't. don't let type 2 diabetes get between you and your heart. even if you reach your a1c goal you are still at risk for heart attack or stroke. talk to your health care provider today about diabetic heart disease. and find out more at heartoftype2.com. your heart and type 2 diabetes. make the connection. nahelps protect eyes fromue damaging blue light, filtering it out to help you continue enjoying your screens. or... you could just put your phones down and talk to each other. [laughing] nature's bounty lutein blue. because you're better off healthy. we all want restful sleep. that's why nature's bounty melatonin is made to help you fall asleep faster and stay asleep longer. so you'll be ready for whatever tomorrow brings.

because mom's love is unconditional. even at 6am. nature's bounty melatonin. we're all better off healthy. we believe in food that's anaturally beautiful,, fresh and nutritious. so there are no artificial colors, no artificial flavors, no artificial preservatives in any of the food we sell. we believe in real food. whole foods market. discover card. i justis this for real?match, yep. we match all the cash back new cardmembers earn at the end of their first year, automatically. whoo! i got my money! hard to contain yourself, isn't it? uh huh! let it go! whoo! get a dollar-for-dollar match at the end of your first year. only from discover.

...that is, until you taste our new menu. discover more ways to enjoy seafood with new tasting plates small plates, with big flavor- like yucatan shrimp in chili-lime butter and caramelized pineapple. and if you like hot, buttery maine lobster, check out this petite red lobster roll. for new entrees, explore globally-inspired dishes like spicy dragon shrimp. and now, when you order any two new or classic entrees, you get a free tasting plate. so get your coupon at redlobster.com and join us today!

back to politics in a moment. first, a quick update on the disturbing events yesterday in hawaii. officials confirm human error. somebody hitting the wrong button is to blame for sending the incoming ballistic missile alert that caused understandably quite a panic on saturday. cnn's sara sidner is in hawaii. panic not too strong of a word for how people reacted. >> reporter: john, that emergency alert did create panic here in hawaii for those who received it. it said there was an inbound missile coming to hawaii, to seek shelter, and that this was

not a drill. that last bit really sent some people over the edge. people were calling their family members, telling them this may be their last conversation. we also spoke to a state representative, who said, he gathered his family in the bathroom, put his children in the bathtub, and hovered over them and they prayed during that time. he was in tears, talking about the fact that his daughter looked at him and said, dad, are we at war? and he turned back to her and said, yes, yes, we are. but then, 38 minutes later -- 38 minutes later -- there was another message from emergency management officials saying, this was a false alarm. that has a lot of people frustrated here. they do not understand why it took so long for the message to get back out to the public and there is an inquiry, an investigation happening right now to try to figure out how to deal with this very important issue. one of the reasons why emotions are heightened here is, of course, because of the rhetoric that people have been listening to here and around the world

between president trump and kim jong-un of north korea. hawaii, particularly, very, very disturbed by all of it. because they know that there is only 20 minutes between the time of a launch from north korea to the time of an impact here in hawaii. the public would have about 15 minutes to figure out how to take shelter and that information, by the way, has been released to the public quite a bit lately, because hawaii was the very first state in december to test its attack warning sirens. trying to get information out to the public that this is what you are supposed to do if you hear this siren. what is interesting now, though, is that the sirens didn't go off. this was an accident where emergency managers said, look, somebody accidentally pressed the wrong button as there was a shift change. that button sent out messages through television. it sent out messages through radio and through text, but it did not sound the sirens.

they said they are looking into how this all happened and they're trying to make sure that this never happens again. >> sara sidner in hawaii. we'll keep an eye on that story as hawaiian officials try to explain just what happened and what they're going to do about it. even before the president's vulgar rant, the gop retirement list got some new additions as more and more republicans look to november and see a midterm tsunami is almost inevitable. the first target for democrats in trying to retake the house, 23 republican members of congress who represent districts that hillary clinton carried in the 2016 presidential election. four of them, now, have announced they're either retiring or running for something else. keep an eye on the rest of them as primary deadlines come up and filing deadlines come up. this is target "a" for the democrats. overall, 3 republicans already have said we're retiring, running for something else, but we do not want to run for re-election in the house in this environment. that's a big number. again, we're in january.

watch february, watch march as filing deadlines come up, how much higher does that number go? democrats need 24. 24 pickup, net, to get control of the house back from republicans. this, for all the numbers you're going to hear, keep an eye on this one. in midterm elections, the first midterm election of a new presidency, the president's approval number almost always determines what happens in november. 37% of americans, that's it, approve of how the president is doing his job right now. a little historical comparison. it was 46% for president obama heading into his first midterm election. 46%. they lost 63 house seats and control of the house there. this is what republicans worry about. the president is well below this number. they remember that number. that's how they came to power in washington. so the house speaker, paul ryan, already with enough challenges, and then the president this week, added another. >> first thing that came to my mind was very unfortunate, unheal unhealthful. i see this as a thing to celebrate. and i think it's a big part of

our strength. whether you're coming from haiti. we've got great friends from africa in janesville, who are doctors, who are just incredible citizens. and i just think it's important that we celebrate that. >> and the political consultants call that a pivot. say something, so that you're on the record being critical of the president, and then try to pivot off. we'll get into more of the details as we move through the hour. the president is already tweeting this morning saying, i want a merit-based immigration system, i want the best to come into america. it would be nicer if he had say that in the oval office meeting compared to what he said. because the republicans can't escape what he said. he can tweet all he wants. they can't escape what he said or being asked about it. this was a bad environment to begin with. to tom davis who used to run the house campaign committee said on nbc the other day, this looks like a tsunami. tsunami means speaker pelosi. >> it does. i talked to a republican operative that's heavily

involved in house races this week and said, what's the best-case scenario? they said the best-care scenario is losing between 17 and 20 seats for republicans. that's the best-case scenario for them right now. they're worried about their retirements, worried about these districts as you pointed out where clinton won and trump didn't and you had republican members in there. and manu knows this from being up on the hill every day. when you talk to republicans who are facing re-election this fall, they are in a real bind. they are trying to focus locally. they are trying to make themselves a bit distinctive from the president, if they're in some of these competitive races, but they can't escape his shadow, because it is so long. it overshadows everything they do right now. >> especially if they're navigating between a primary and a general, they have to worry about the trump base and a general election that's sort of the case for people like dean heller in nevada among some others. republicans really believe in order to keep the house majority, they have to really convince the voters that the tax bill is helping them. that they actually are going to

see a benefit from the tax bill. because by and large, the tax bill, as we know, the law, is very unpopular. a lot of people believe that their taxes, in fact, are going to go up because of that. and that is the big messaging that they have to take to voters. the challenge is going to be, again, when the president continues to get into controversy, continues to say things like he did last week that are so shocking and overshadow everything, that's going to undercut their ability to sell anything. and i also want to point out that from the poll that you showed in the last segment, the president's numbers about trust going completely underwater, if they can't sell the tax bill, because the voters can't trust the president, that's another huge problem going into november. >> that is one of the issues. the president is about to hit the one-year mark. late this week. 16% of americans give the president an "a." 16% give him a "b." 11% give him a "c." 17% give him a "d." when i was growing up that was failing. 39% give him an "f."

the president's standing is what determines midterm elections, barring something out of the ordinary. and if you're the republicans now, you're just looking at that. so do you run, which causes even more problems, because then your base gets confused about what to do. you can't hug him. what do you do? >> and this is exactly why the best-case scenario that julie's consultant talked about is 17 to 20. because what's the magic number? 24, right? >> right. >> you cannot overstate how completely the dynamic would change in washington if democrats retake the house. it would be a fundamental, fundamental turning point for this white house. >> and to manu's point, i get it politically for republicans. i think there's a principle issues when the president says what he says in the oval office yesterday, but i get it politically if you're in a competitive environment, especially a primary. gary tuchman was out on the road just yesterday talking to trump voters and they don't like it when the president says things like this, but they're remarkably loyal. >> we could have done -- done -- done better there, but i think he talked in more -- more so in terms of voicing that against

the leadership of the country, more so than the people of the country. >> reporter: but the fact that he used that word at all to describe a country in any way, shape, or form? >> not presidential, no. not presidential. >> i don't think that he would have intentionally insulted any country, and that just came out of his mouth, and that's the way he operates. he operates from the hip. >> so a lot of his voters, they kind of wish it didn't happen, but they're loyal to him personally. if you're a republican member of congress, and those people live in your district, you fight with the press and say you're wrong to the president, you risk losing them. if you don't stand up to the president and all the democrats come out to play, you're in trouble. boom. >> and republicans say they are noticing higher energy and enthusiasm on the democratic side, which is always a question, you know, when you get into these races, where is the

energy item w energy? yes, trump's voters are loyal to him. are they going to be as enthusiastic as they were when they're voting for people who aren't trump, for another republican? democrats feel like they have a lot of motivation behind them. but certainly for these republicans who look at those voters, that is the struggle that they've been dealing with for 18 months mow. there is a chunk of the republican party that is with trump that will make an excuse for him, that will try to explain away even the most controversial statement or policy decision and those are voters that republicans need. >> and remember, back in the obama days, you have the trump coalition, in the obama days, the years that he was not on the ballot -- >> those voters didn't show up. >> they didn't come to play. >> much more on that in the months ahead. ahead, a government spending plan and a big debate about there's any chance for a deal that would protect the so-called d.r.e.a.m.ers. my healthy routine helps me feel my best. so i add activia yogurt to my day. with its billions of live and active probiotics, activia may help support my digestive health, so i can take on my day. activia. now in probiotic dailies.

yes or no?gin. do you want the same tools and seamless experience across web and tablet? do you want $4.95 commissions for stocks, $0.50 options contracts? $1.50 futures contracts? what about a dedicated service team of trading specialists? did you say yes? good, then it's time for power e*trade. the platform, price and service that gives you the edge you need. looks like we have a couple seconds left. let's do some card twirling twirling cards e*trade. the original place to invest online.

wiback like it could used to? neutrogena hydro boost water gel. with hyaluronic acid it plumps skin cells with intense hydration and locks it in. for supple, hydrated skin. hydro boost. from neutrogena

welcome back. the context of the president's

hateful oval office outburst is important. remember, the president began the past week looking to show he was in command and looking to show he was in the mood to make a compassionate deal to protect the so-called d.r.e.a.m.ers from deportation. >> i feel having the democrats in with us is absolutely vital, because this should be a bipartisan bill. this should be a bill of love, truly. it should be a bill of love. and we can do that. i'll take the heat. i don't care. i don't care. i'll take all the heat you want to give me. and i'll take the heat off both the democrats and the republicans. >> that talk of love and of comprehensive immigration reform brought a backlash from the talk radio and fox news crowd. in other words, from the places the president looks for praise and policy advice. >> the president held a televised meeting with the very swamp creatures he once denounced. he told them he trusted them to craft immigration policy without his input. so what was the point of running for president? >> if it does not include a wall, a real wall, not a

see-through wall, expect a political revolt from the base. which means losing the house and maybe even losing the senate. >> so the week starts, we need an act of love, i want to work with democrats, do a daca deal, and then even send me comprehensive immigration reform, i'll sign it, i'll take the heat. the weekends with, why would we let haitians in from this country. why would we want people from those bleephole countries in africa in this country? can you connect the dots? it's the backlash that got the president into a much more hard line, including offensive place? >> it's a good question. i think we can get in trouble trying to connect the dots in donald trump's white house. i will say that i disagree that his talk earlier in the week riled the base. this isn't tucker carlson's wall. this isn't laura ingraham's wall. it's the trump wall. the big, beautiful trump wall. and whatever immigration bill trump signs is going to be good as gold with the base.

and republicans know that. and i think they are betting that that applies to daca, as well. now, when you get into the details of daca, the bill of love comment earlier in the week, our interview with the president, he described daca as wanting to look -- uses heart. he wanted to use common sense. to us, he was telling his party to be flexible on daca. but then when he walks into the meeting, you know, almost minutes later, and has these other comments, it's hard to square those together. >> it is hard to square those things. again this morning, as we sit here at the table, the president is up tweeting, he's at mar-a-lago in florida. @realdonaldtrump. "daca is probably dead because the democrats don't really want it. they just want to talk and take desperately needed money away from our military." well, the democrats do want the deal. the problem with this one, almost everyone wants the deal. there's a faction of conservatives who call it amnesty. almost everyone else wants deal,

they just want different deals. >> and the facts are that the president was presented a bipartisan proposal that was reached by a small group of senators, not necessarily one that could pass the senate, but it was something presumably he could have embraced -- >> it would have passed the senate if he would have blessed it. >> exactly. and you would have fight to get it through the house, but he rejected that. this despite him saying just days earlier, in that meeting in the white house, that he would be willing to sign whatever this group, whatever congress comes up with. this is really putting members in both sides in a very difficult position, because they don't know where the president stands on this. they don't know what they can support, what deal they could cut, that could ultimately get the president's blessing. so it's leaving really the congress to figure out what to do. and as we know, congress has struggled for so many years on immigration policy, uncertain how they resolve this. >> and democrats in part because of this energy on the left that they know exists right now have been facing a lot of pressure to take a really tough line on daca, to not bend, to not compromise on anything involving a wall or border security. and i think it will be interesting to watch how the president's controversial

comments last week influence their position this week. do they feel more emboldened? do they feel like they can take a harder line, that they don't have to look for room to compromise, especially now that the president has rejected a compromise bill. >> and you see that pressure. i want to put this on the table as we continue, to that point, "the washington post" editorial board, they understand this pressure. now that the democratic base is saying, don't negotiate with the racist. that's what they call the president. "the washington post" says, the wall is a dumb idea, but consider how rare it is that a dumb idea in congress actually buys something smart in return. they were too young, they were brought in by family members or parents, et cetera. take the deal. can democrats negotiate and what's he willing to give them? >> they're having their own internal question. this is the base question on the democratic side, as well. and the leverage point has been the deadline for the government shutdown, right? january 19th, that's this upcoming friday. and so the question in part has

been, if the government did shut down, would the republicans who are in charm of the house and the senate and the white house get blamed, or would the democrats in a kind of wag the dog way, kind of get blamed, right? well, the blame quotient changes considerably when the president paints himself into a corner like this. so democrats tonight base side are feeling more emboldened, like, yeah, take it over a cliff, everyone's going to blame the president. on the other hand, if they actually could give some marginal nod to border security, the president calls it a wall. nobody else does, and they get daca, they've done a big thing for an important constituency that tends to vote democratic. so, there's a lot of politics. >> and it also might help some of those democratic senators from trump states say, i voted for border security. help them as well. we'll see. it is a very much an understatement to say, very fascinating week ahead, as that shutdown deadline approaches on friday and whether they can try to get a daca deal and whether they punt, a word we hear should be left only for football, but

we hear it a lot. the president slams a law his white house calls crucial and then leaves in place an iran deal he calls useless. mashed potatoes...and rice! but made from cauliflower. looks like i need a fork! oh no. (giggles) birds eye veggie made. so veggie good.

coming at you with my brand-new vlog. just making some ice in my freezer here. so check back for that follow-up vid. this is my cashew guy bruno. holler at 'em, brun. kicking it live and direct here at the fountain. should i go habanero or maui onion? should i buy a chinchilla? comment below. did i mention i save people $620 for switching? chinchilla update -- got that chinchilla after all. say what up, rocco. ♪

say what up, rocco. pain from chest congestion can make this... when you have a cold, ...feel like this. all-in-one cold symptom relief from tylenol®, the #1 doctor recommended pain relief brand.

tylenol®. the president likes to brag that he's flexible. there was no shortage of proof this past week. some of it stems from major internal policy divides. those who want to keep the iran nuclear deal in place, for example, want the president around. despite saying not all that longing a they were about out of patience. some of this stems from the president's cable tv habits. moments after a fox news commentator trashed a law, the president trashed it too. the house speaker was among those who had to call and remind the president he very much supports the law and the president then sent a second tweet to square the circle. this one remains without full explanation. president trump then and now on whether he's willing to sit down for an interview with the russia meddling special counsel, robert mueller. >> would you be willing to speak

under oath to give your version of those events? >> 100%. we'll see what happens. certainly, i'll see what happens. but when they have no collusion, and nobody has found any collusion at any level, it seems unlikely that you'd even have an interview. >> more than curious about that shift, because i'm always guided by the fact that the president knows a lot more than we know about his lawyers' negotiations with the special counsel, about other witnesses' dealings with the special counsel. why? >> that's a great question. because it is a shift. his posture and the white house lawyer's posture for months has been, we're willing to cooperate, there's nothing to hide here. of course, he would sit down with him. of course we would have these kind of conversations. notable that the president is leaning so hard, though, on collusion. which has been a real open question. there is no evidence that we've seen so far of collusion between the president and russia during the campaign. but that's not all mueller is looking into. >> right. >> he is looking into obstruction, things that happened during the transition, and during the first weeks of

the trump administration. and that's where the president himself seems most vulnerable. >> and we reported last week, john, that a number of his allies and confidants are urging the president not to agree to sit down with mueller or to at least significant limit the scope, maybe do written questions instead, because they're very concerned that it could impact his presidency significantly, adversely if he says something wrong, as one conservative congressman told me, matt gates, he said if he makes a mistake, it could redefine his presidency in a way that he does not want. he should avoid sitting down with him. >> certainly, he's given to hyperbole. we know that can be problematic in testimony. but also, just look at what we've been talking about so far on the show. and some of the sort of speech patterns that have evolved in the last week. he says something in a meeting, then he says he didn't say and tries to clarify what he meant when he said it. this isn't just on the immigration debate. this has to do with an interview with the journal earlier this week, a whole number of things. he said, that's not what i

meant. that's one thing when it's in the public arena. it's a complete other thing when you're giving testimony as part of a federal investigation. >> right, even if you're not under oath. when you're speaking to investigators, you can -- yeah, dicey territory. let's move to something else. another shift from the president we've seen play out is, remember rocket man? he's short, he's fat, lock and load, fire and fury. the president has had some tough words about north korea and kim jong-un. but in the "wall street journal" interview this week, he said he would probably have a good relationship with kim jong-un. michael bernander, you pressed president, have you actually spoken with him, why would you say that? and he wouldn't answer. the president is tweeting this morning, t"the wall street journal" stated falsely that i have a good relationship. i didn't say that. i said, i'd have a good relationship with kim jong-un. fortunately, we now record conversations with reporters. um, fire away. >> first, i have to regret that it's come to this, right? we had a substantiative

45-minute interview with the president that he enjoyed to the point where he was pushing off additional meetings and at the end, sort of talking about us coming back in on a monthly basis to do this again. he was open about highs and lows about his presidency. he brought up the "fire and fury" book on his own. and i would urge voters to go to wsj.com and read the entire transcript. it was a fun interview, i think, for both sides. he's now disputing the contraction in a quote. when we were sitting there listening to him, we heard him say that "i probably have a good relationship with kim jong-un." now he's saying that his quote was, "i'd probably have." we put up our audio, we have our transcript, the wlohite house h put up their audio. i'll leave it at that. the broader point, i think, is that it does not change the overall point of what he was trying to make.

and where you started off there, he's gone from being very combative with kim jong-un to now, at least suggesting that he's open to a meeting and, you know, in a presidency that kind of ups and downs, he signaling that he's interested in peace and a democratic solution and total annihilation. >> at the moment, the president for reasons understood only by the president, is trying to pick a fight with the quote/unquote fake news. our reporters share from their notebooks next including the stakes as the president hits the campaign trail this week.

in birds eye protein blends. ok. they're delicious side dishes with the protein of beans, whole grains... ...and veggies! mmm, good. my work here is dooooone! bird's eye protein blends. so veggie good. 7joining her daughter'st tyoga class.ut she was thinking about her joints. but now that she's taking osteo bi-flex, she's noticing a real difference in her joint comfort. with continued use, it supports increased flexibility over time. karen: "she's single." it also supports wonderfully high levels of humiliation in her daughter. karen: "she's a little bit shy." in just 7 days, your joint comfort can be your kid's discomfort. osteo bi-flex. you were made to move. so move.

discover card. i justis this for real?match, yep. we match all the cash back new cardmembers earn at the end of their first year, automatically. whoo! i got my money! hard to contain yourself, isn't it? uh huh! let it go! whoo! get a dollar-for-dollar match at the end of your first year. only from discover. we believe in food that's anaturally beautiful,, fresh and nutritious. so there are no artificial colors, no artificial flavors, no artificial preservatives in any of the food we sell. we believe in real food. whole foods market.

let's take one last trip around the "inside politics" table and ask our great reporters to share a little something from their notebooks, help get you out ahead of the big political news just around the corner. julie pace? >> one of the reasons republicans were so happy coming off the 2016 elections isn't just what was happening in washington, with it was their success in the states, in places like missouri, where you had

eric greitens winning the gubernatorial race and setting himself up as one of the party's rising stars. no now his future is in doubt after allegations of an affair and blackmail. democrats would love to have a chance to make up some ground in missouri. and for both parties, this is a real question of how politicians can survive in this will era of sexual misconduct, the me too movement. gr greitens is digging in right now, he's pushing back on the blackmail questions. but as several people i've talked to have said, other politicians have gone down for much less than what he's being accused of. >> we'll keep our eye on that one ahead. >> president trump this week heads to pennsylvania, the site of one of his biggest electoral upsets in 2016. and this time, he's going -- he's trying to reverse another losing streak there in the state. this is coming after losses in alabama, a series of losses in virginia, now he's campaigning

in pennsylvania and the special election there. here's why it's important. i improved mike pence in his west wing office last week with my colleague, peter nicholas. he made clear that he and trump are going to be very, very involved in this race and in the midterms throughout the year. they're going to be recruiting candidates in ohio. they're trying to protect incumbents, like a very vulnerable one in nevada, and they'll be fund-raising from start to finish. this race in pennsylvania is the first opportunity this year to show how much impact the party's top two republicans can have. >> republicans are already starting to walk away. if they lose that pennsylvania race, they'll be running. manu? >> there's growing expectation among senate republicans that florida governor rick scott is going to challenge bill nelson in that state senate race, which would set up one of the marquise races in the country, one that would presumably determine the senate majority. if he were to run, it would be a recruiting coup for the president after having several challenges, setbacks in recent days, and particularly in north dakota, last week, when congressman ken cramer was

seriously considering running against heidi heitkamp, a democrat. cramer had been urged by trump and vice president pence to run. he decided not to do that. scott, i'm told, is seriously considering it. he has had a number of conversations including with lamar alexander, marco rubio. rubio himself told me that scott will make a decision after the end of this legislative session, which will be in march. of course, we'll see what the political environment is then. perhaps he may not want to dig into his big, personal fortune to take a risk on a very -- would be a challenging senate run. and of course, he got that political gift from the white house after the interior department decided to suddenly abandon this decision to allow offshore drilling off the florida coast. but, it shows you the depths and the lengths that the administration is trying to go to help a political ally. >> if he says no after that, it will tell you everything you need to know about the political environment. margaret? >> well, as president trump gets

ready to mark his first year in office since his inauguration, the vice president is who i'll be keeping my eye on. i'll actually be with him. he is traveling the end of the week to the middle east for this trip that was supposed to happen about a month ago. it was postponed so that he could be in town in case he was needed for that tax vote. and originally supposed to be meeting with palestinians and persecuted christian minorities as well as israeli officials. that's the palestinian part of this. and still the minority christian part of this is still off, because of the president piece jerusalem decision, which you know was pretty divisive in the middle east. so, new importance on his meeting with the egyptian leader. that could be very important. and an added stop in jordan, but all told, we will be able to use that trip as a lens to kind of gauge the implications in the middle east about that decision affecting the palestinians and the peace process. and also, it's a chance, i think, for us to see pence taking on this much more public role, both domestically in some of these midterm races and on

the foreign stage. >> fascinating to watch in the days ahead. we'll keep an eye on that. maybe talk to you from the middle east. i'll close with this. one casualty of the dustup over the president's vulgar immigration, might be the bromance between the president and lindsey graham. the south carolina republican was speaking when the president aired his objections about haitians and africans. when the story was breaking the other day, the white house hoped republicans in the room would defend the president or at least stay silent. but graham issued a statement that while not getting into the details confirmed he had challenged some of the president's views. graham's statement went on to praise democrat dick durbin, who was also in the room and who publicly angered the white house with a detailed account of behavior that durbin labeled vile and racist. once a fierce trump critic, graham, of course, recently, has been a presidential defender and a golf buddy of late. now, the senator knows the president is mad at him, but he believes he did the right thing. senator, you did. that's it for "inside politics."

again, thanks for sharing your sunday. "state of t yoihe union" with j tapper, and an interview with mia love, the haitian from utah who says that the president should apologize for that oval office outburst. great interview ahead. have a great sunday. you won't believe how much is new at red lobster...

...that is, until you taste our new menu. discover more ways to enjoy seafood with new tasting plates small plates, with big flavor- like yucatan shrimp in chili-lime butter and caramelized pineapple. and if you like hot, buttery maine lobster, check out this petite red lobster roll.

for new entrees, explore globally-inspired dishes like spicy dragon shrimp. and now, when you order any two new or classic entrees, you get a free tasting plate. so get your coupon at redlobster.com and join us today! so get your coupon at i no wondering, "what if?" uncertainties of hep c. i let go of all those feelings. because i am cured with harvoni. harvoni is a revolutionary treatment for the most common type of chronic hepatitis c. it's been prescribed to more than a quarter million people. and is proven to cure up to 99% of patients who've have had no prior treatment with 12 weeks. certain patients can be cured with just 8 weeks of harvoni. before starting harvoni, your doctor will test to see if you've ever had hepatitis b, which may flare up and cause serious liver problems during and after harvoni treatment. tell your doctor if you've ever had hepatitis b, a liver transplant, other liver or kidney problems, hiv or any other medical conditions and about all the medicines you take including herbal supplements.

taking amiodarone with harvoni can cause a serious slowing of your heart rate. common side effects of harvoni include tiredness, headache and weakness. ready to let go of hep c? ask your hep c specialist about harvoni.

terrifying alert. panic in hawaii after a false alarm was sent out, warning people to seek shelter from an incoming ballistic missile. >> when we got the alarm, we were actually terrified. we didn't know what to do. >> how did this m