welcome to "inside politics." i'm john king. to our viewers in the united states and around the world, thank you for sharing your sunday. a lot to discuss. the president's lawyer says the special counsel should close his investigation. and as the president praises a decision to fire the former fbi deputy director, critics see yet another effort to undermine and intimidat intimidate. >> i found him to be an honest, decent person who knew a lot about the president's ties to russia and i just fear that this is a punitive act, a petty act, right before he's about to collect his pension.

but more intended to send a message to anyone who would cross the president. >> plus, the president now trying to silence stormy daniels. new court filings claim the porn actress could be forced to pay as much as $20 million for talking about her relationship with the president. >> we're not going to tolerate any nonsense with threats and bullying tactics. they will go nowhere with me and my client. >> and the first big vote of the 2018 midterm season sends a major message. democrats ran strong in trump country. republicans now see their house majority in grave danger. >> we're running into a major storm. a big-time hurricane-force wind. and you know, we are going to be defined by all of these issues swirling around us, unless we're able to enable our own brand and our own identity in our own districts. this is a five-alarm fire. >> with us this sunday to share their reporting and their insights, screw julie pace of t

associated press, cnn's jeff zeleny, and politico's rachael bey. the president says it's time for the russian meddling investigation to shut down. the president himself tweets, it never should have started to begin with. those tweets with both john dowd's new statement and the new tweet from the president are laughable. and both twist the truth. the president's own treasury department cited the work of the special counsel this week in imposing new sanctions on russia. we also learned this past week the special counsel has obtained subpoenas for trump organization business records, bringing the investigation deep into the president's family business. and now new trouble for the president's 2016 campaign. facebook late friday announced it had suspended the data firm central to the trump voter targeting, saying it improperly obtained and used information about millions of american voters. "the new york times" has a fascinating and detailed report on how the cambridge analytica operation worked, and how it raises a number of new questions, not only about raising privacy violations, but

also about possible violations of laws prohibiting foreigners from working on u.s. campaigns. more questions and yet, the president and his lawyers respond by saying the investigation should be shut down or never should have begun to begin, just as the president launches new attacks on the credibility of the investigation and the investigators. attorney general jeff sessions late friday firing the former fbi deputy director andrew mccabe, just hours before his retirement was to take effect. the attorney general says mccabe had made an unauthorized leak to the news media and misled investigators. mccabe says he's being singled out and punished for corroborating the former fbi director james comey's accounts of how he received pressure from the president. cnn has told mccabe, like comey, has detailed notes about his conversations with the president. and like comey, mccabe has been interviewed by mueller's team and shared his memos. the conservative red state sees the firing as a way for the attorney general to inch back into the president's good graces, or as they put it,

andrew mccabe has died so that jeff sessions may live. a lot to talk about. let's start with the tone from the president and the president's lawyer. new information that proves the special counsel has a lot of work before him, a lot of legitimate work before him. and the president's lawyer says i pray he shuts it down. and the president tweets, it never should have started to begin with. >> i think the main takeaway here is that the president is really agitated and really concerned about the fact that the mueller probe is ongoing and seems to be with every step getting closer to either the president or people around him. you mentioned the cambridge analytica story. that was a firm that his son-in-law, jared kushner, worked very closely with during the campaign. the idea that mueller is subpoenaing records from the trump organization. trump is very sensitive about his business dealings. russia contacts aside, he's very sensitive about his own personal wealth and his business history. and he has been told by his lawyers repeat delay this was an

investigation that was going to be over at the end of 2017. that certainly isn't the case. so i think all of this taken together, you have a president who is really fuming over the fact that this circle seems to be forming around him right now. i think that they're a lot of concern, both within the white house and among republicans on capitol hill that he could take the really aggressive step of actually trying to fire mueller. >> it seems like this was a trial balloon for that, right? the statement from john dowd suggesting that the special counsel needed to wrap up its work. the president has sort of recently listened to his counsel and sort of stepped back and not taken this aggressive approach that republicans think will undermine their own credibility when they, you know, when they can say, oh, the president was never charged with anything. i think that republicans on the hill will shoot this trial balloon down very quickly. >> but why not immediately? why not immediately, in the sense that when the lawyer came out yesterday, this has been a recurring story. when asked about, they say, let bob mueller finish his work. but the attorney does this yesterday, then president follows up a few hours later,

saying, this never should have begun to begin with. in both statements, there are factual errors about how the investigation got started. we know, 13 russians indicted, national security adviser flips, multiple indictments. and then you have every member of congress, republican and democrat, needs to speak up in defense of the special counsel now. the democratic leader of the senate issued a statement. when you ask mitch mcconnell or paul ryan, they'll say, let him finish. why aren't they outfront? >> they have never been outfront in terms of criticizing the president. this is something they just don't like to do. it's uncomfortable for them, and honestly, a lot have criticized the republican leadership saying they don't have the spine to stand up to trump. but this week, i expect when you ask them, thaey're going to say no, this is a separate issue. mccabe's firing, they may say, it was justified, look, it was by fbi career officials, not

politicians, who made that decision. but they'll say that is different than the russia probe and the russia probe needs to continue in the vein it is. >> and it represents the most c confrontational tone we've seen yet. i ask sarah sanders this week in the briefing room if this crosses the president's so-called red line, subpoenaing the document, she said, we are going to cooperate. we'll see. john dowd said he was acting on his own on saturday, sending out that first statement. i'm not so sure about that. >> it sounded a lot like trump's tweet. >> very much so. >> trump almost said the exact same thing later in the day. and you mentioned the the inaccuracies in that tweet. he's really conflating a number of things and making false assertions, namely that this was started by the steele dossier, this fbi investigation. no, it wasn't. it was, in fact, what we know is that this investigation was ongoing when the dossier came to light. and that there was surveillance based on the dossier of his campaign. well, actually, it was the fisa

warrant in october, just a couple of weeks before the campaign, carter paige was no longer part of the campaign. he said the mueller probe wouldn't have been started had -- wouldn't have been started. well, the reason why the mueller probe was started, is because he fired james comey, the fbi director. there's a lot of things the president is conflating as a way to undercut the mueller probe, more so than eahe's ever done. >> the president's lawyer speaking as a politician there, not as a lawyer. but the president this morning right now is attacking james comey again on twitter. i'm not even going to read the tweet. most of the president's tweets doing this are out of context. this is online now. he's attacking james comey. yesterday, he celebrated the firing of andrew mccabe, comey's former deputy. now, there are some in the justice department who say there were grounds to fire andrew mccabe, that andrew mccabe crossed the line in terms of professional reliability. should the president of the

united states be saying sstit's great day? he said, fired, a great day. comey is about to come out with a book. if it comes down to their word against the president's, that's what the president is trying to do here. he's trying to say, these guys cannot be believed, if they tell you i did sympathetomething. >> right, this whole effort seems to be as undercut them as witnesses in the mueller investigation, which to manu's point was started in large part because of the firing of comey. and we know that questions about obstruction of justice are really at the center of what mueller is focused on as it relates to trump himself. i think with trump, you often find yourself in this situation where there's a difference between what he can do as president and perhaps what he should do, politically. mccabe firing seems to fit right in there. certainly, sessions had the authority to fire mccabe and there was a recommendation that he could take that action, should the president have done that? does that help him politically? at least in the short-term, it doesn't seem like it will.

>> it will be interesting to see if some of the things that mccabe said on friday night actually turn out to be true. one of the things he did say is that after it was revealed by us in the press in december, what he said to the thousands intelligence committee, that he could corroborate james comey's accounts, that the inspector general and the other investigations, internally, started to focus very intensely on him. because he believed he was being squeezed, he was being singled out because he was corroborate james comey's accounts. we don't know if that's the case. there's a lot more that need to come out. but if that is, that's going to be a pretty remarkable thing. >> and as this drama plays out, onwant to let the story about cambridge analytica go by. months ago, someone told me what the special counsel is trying to do, he has the russian targeting on facebook, and he has the trump campaign targeting on facebook, and looking at the overlays of who he targeted to try to say, how similar are these? and if they are so similar, and i was told, they are very similar, how did that happen? is that a coincidence? you read "the new york times"

story, it says they improperly obtained all of this data from facebook and used it to target voters. so is it fair to say that the candidate from day one who complained about a rigged system, from day one, was cheating? >> it certainly is, every month we've gotten more information, but this story, i believe, is -- it's incredibly explosive, because as julie mentioned earlier, jared kushner was a deep -- he was deeply involved in cambridge analytica, was very proud of all of the work that they did there. this is hoping a whole new pathway, if you will, of places to go on this. and bob mueller is down the path and we're just always a few steps behind him. several steps behind him, seeing where they're going here. but i believe this is absolutely a very important development. and facebook suspended them for a reason here on friday. so this is, you know, a potential huge issue. >> as we track this

shakespearean drama. he knows a lot more than we do. and when you see the mood he's in and the people he's attacking -- >> and firing. >> -- and firing. it tells you he knows something we don't know. up next, the white house chief of staff tells aides to get to work and stop worrying about personnel chaos. but the big boss is still promising more changes. and republicans say the darnedest things. here's "saturday night live's" take on attorney general jeff sessions' relief now that andrew mccabe has been fired. >> look at me! i've still got a job. >> sir, sir, can you give us the exact reason mccabe was fired? >> well, um, yes. mr. mccabe was in clear violation, um, because of his lack of candor -- i don't know. i can't even dance around. trump made me do it. mccabe saw too much, you know? >> tech: at safelite autoglass

we know that when you're spending time with the grandkids... ♪ music >> tech: ...every minute counts. and you don't have time for a cracked windshield. that's why at safelite, we'll show you exactly when we'll be there. with a replacement you can trust. all done sir. >> grandpa: looks great! >> tech: thanks for choosing safelite. >> grandpa: thank you! >> child: bye! >> tech: bye! saving you time... so you can keep saving the world. >> kids: ♪ safelite repair, safelite replace ♪

or a c-anything-o. but i've got an idea sir. get domo. it'll connect us to everything that's going on in the company. get it for jean who's always cold. for the sales team, it and the warehouse crew. give us the data we need. in one place, anywhere we need it. help us do our jobs better. with domo we can run this place together. well that's that's your job i guess. ♪

only tylenol® rapid release gels have laser drilled holes. they release medicine fast, for fast pain relief. tylenol® at&t gives you more for your thing. your me-time thing. that sunday night date night with hbo allllllll night thing. that island without men or children would be nice to visit thing. buy an at&t unlimited plan, and get hbo included. more for your thing that's our thing. ♪ ♪ there are two types of people in the world. those who fear the future...

and those who embrace it. the future is for the unafraid. ♪ ♪ the future is for the unafraid. show of hands. let's get started. who wants customizable options chains? ones that make it fast and easy to analyze and take action? how about some of the lowest options fees? are you raising your hand? good then it's time for power e*trade the platform, price and service that gives you the edge you need. alright one quick game of rock, paper, scissors. 1, 2, 3, go. e*trade. the original place to invest online. welcome back. when the white house chief of staff summons reporters to insist all is calm, one thing is certain, all is not calm.

there is a new piece or detente between the chief of staff and the president. they had a clarity meeting thursday night and kelly is staying. plus, h.r. mcmaster is still the national security adviser. there was a big buzz friday morning he would be the next security administration officials to be shown the door. the west wing remains on edge, because the president is openly discussing his desire for more big changes. so where are we? the mood in the building is one of anxiety, and that's a great understatement. we thought mcmaster might be out by friday. there was talk that kelly might be out. it's sunday. heading into the new workweek. but he still says he wants change. talking about change in a good way. he was the one personally fueling this speculation last week. he said multiple times, i almost have my team in place. never mind that we're like 14 months into the administration. why is there a need for a second round of players here? but, look, people are on edge. i had phone calls from people at

various agencies wondering if their cabinet secretary, any had heard anything, if they were in trouble. so no one is up to speed on exactly what's going on. the reality here is, there's probably going to be a firing of a cabinet secretary. it seems like v.a. secretary gary shulkin is probably top on the list. we'll see about h.r. mcmaster. they've not been able to find a replacement, necessarily, who fits everything he wants. it does seem the chief of staff is stafe for now. one of the reasons, hard to find qualified, competent people to take these jobs. but now, because of the investigation, and everything else. >> it feels like an episode of "the apprentice." everything feels like an episode of "the apprentice." you say that and you want to laugh, but you can't laugh. it's the united states government. h.r. mcmaster, south koreans love him. we're supposed to have a summit with kim jong-un down the line, maybe. you look at the veterans affairs agency, to the trump administration's credit, they've tried to put attention to there to try to make it better.

sto if you go to make a change, make a change. >> this is why this is more than past intrigue and gossip in the west wing. this is about the actual functions of the u.s. government. jeff makes a really important point. it's not as though trump can fire people in these high-profile roles and quickly get someone to slip in. there simply isn't an appetite among a lot of republicans to step into this administration, knowing everything you're going to put on the line in terms of an investigation that is ongoing and your own dealings with the president. they look at someone like jeff sessions, the first senator to endorse president trump. and look at the relationship he's in with the president. how would it be any easier for someone who comes in and doesn't have that pre-existing relationship? >> and jeff, i want everyone to listen. jeff put this question to vsara huckabee sanders during the week about why do you need all this change 14 months in. here's the answer. >> you want the right people for the right time. and as policy priorities change, that means that sometimes you're going to have personnel change.

that's not different for this administration as it has been in any other administration. and we're going to continue to add new staff regularly. >> so what policy priorities are changing? in a sense. we do know pompeo is more of a hawk on iran than tillerson. the president wants that and has every right to want that. the process was messy, but what are we supposed to be looking here? >> with every change in each agency, you'll see a bunch of policy changes. president trump may want to play musical chairs with his cabinet, but he's going to run into a problem with a senate. every one of these guys have to be confirmed, that's going to take time and it will be a political fight they don't want to have in a contentious election year. gina haspel is already becoming a huge issue on the hill. the next potential cia director, is she even going to get confirmed? it seems like even republicans are wary of her because of her background with torture and they're concerned what she's going to do. >> and even pomp pao is going to

face a big fight. confirmation battles are not insignificant -- >> it's an evenly divided senate. >> huge undertakings to get someone through. no real desire, particularly if someone -- if jeff sessions were to be fired, that would cause a huge uproar in the russia investigation. republicans themselves warning that a replacement would be very difficult, if not impossible to replace. but john, you asked about shifting policy priorities and why the president is doing this. really what the president ultimately values is loyalty. and if you don't show loyalty to him in this administration, the chances are you could be on the chopping block. >> and there's a lot more to ask mike pompeo this time around that there was a year ago. he's been the one member of cabinet who every day sees the president, spends one-on-one time with him. and there are a lot of things to ask about that. one thing sarah sanders said, it's the same as every administration. it is not the same. 43% of senior staffers have

moved to a different job, been fired, or quit. more than double any modern american presidency. that's something to keep in mind. this is not normal. >> and we talk often about the pig jobs, national security adviser, secretary of state, secretary of veteran affairs, secretary of housing, they still haven't replaced the communications director, the staff secretary, a number of worker bee jobs. but the critical jobs in the administration, the people who do the work every day, those are all open, as well. it's not just keeping up with the kardashians, not just reality tv, it matters for the government. we'll take a break. democrat breakthrough in trump country next and republicans shift their 2018 outlook from worry to panic. what's team spirit worth? (cheers) what's it worth to talk to your mom? what's the value of a walk in the woods? the value of capital is to create, not just wealth, but things that matter.

morgan stanley jardiance is the only type 2 diabetes pill proven to both significantly reduce the chance of dying from a cardiovascular event in adults who have type 2 diabetes and heart disease... ...and lower your a1c. wow. jardiance can cause serious side effects including dehydration. this may cause you to feel dizzy, faint, or lightheaded, or weak upon standing. ketoacidosis is a serious side effect that may be fatal. symptoms include nausea, vomiting, stomach pain, tiredness, and trouble breathing. stop taking jardiance and call your doctor right away if you have symptoms of ketoacidosis or an allergic reaction. symptoms of an allergic reaction include rash, swelling, and difficulty breathing or swallowing. do not take jardiance if you are on dialysis or have severe kidney problems. other side effects are sudden kidney problems, genital yeast infections, increased bad cholesterol, and urinary tract infections, which may be serious. taking jardiance with a sulfonylurea or insulin may cause low blood sugar. tell your doctor about all the medicines you take and if you have any medical conditions. what do you think?

i think it's time to think about jardiance. ask your doctor about jardiance. and get to the heart of what matters. at a comfort inn with a glow taround them, so people watching will be like, "wow, maybe i'll glow too if i book direct at choicehotels.com." who glows? just say, badda book. badda boom. book now at choicehotels.com. my healthy routine helps me feel my best. so i add activia yogurt to my day. with its billions of live and active probiotics, activia may help support my digestive health, so i can take on my day. activia. now in probiotic dailies. the entire community came whtogether as a whole.t, ♪ it was such an overwhelming response to help others. no one thought that they were going to do this before it happened and everyone just did it. i think that's the way that human nature should be looked at. ♪ i'll stand by you. ♪ i'll stand by you. ♪ won't let nobody hurt you.

♪ i'll stand by you.

i use herpecin l.re, it penetrates deep to treat. it soothes, moisturizes, and creates an spf 30 barrier, to protect against flare-ups caused by the sun. herpecin l.

welcome back. the first big contest of 2018, pennsylvania's 18th congressional district, not officially settled yet, but the message is cleared nonetheless. democrats are ecstatic, republicans despondent. why? the democrat issed in the lead likely to win, but the democrat in the lead in a district president trump carried by 20 points. another reason democrats are happy, the suburban revolt against the president, which we saw throughout 2017 has carried over into 2018. this lower slice of allegheny county going for conor lamb. the president carried this slice against hillary clinton. here's another reason. because of the results here, democratic intensity, the big turnout, the democratic success in trump country, cnn has changed its characterization of 17 more house districts. now, these numbers may mean nothing to you. but last week, there were more seats solid republican, more seats likely republican, more seats lean republican. this week, more toss-ups and a better outlook for the democrats. democrats now, if they can run

so strong in trump country, have abo better odds of getting the house back. that's one way to look at it. let's come out to the national map here. this is the house of representatives across the country right now. this is how it ended after 2016. you see all that red? that's republicans. here's another way to look at this. if you look at pennsylvania 18, these are 20 other districts that are a lot like it. same kind of voters, same kind of economy, same kind of demographics, overwhelmingly white, for example. yes, a handful of seats up here match the demographics, essentially. will democrats run stronger here because of that? maybe. but if you're one of these republicans, you're looking at pennsylvania 18, calling your pollster and campaign team and saying, can that happen to me? the favor getting more reflective of democrats. this has a modest budget, this ad, but call it an effort to turn the tables. >> as republican house speaker paul ryan tools around washington, who does he think

about? the wall street millionaires that ryan gave billions in tax breaks? whoever speaker ryan thinks about, it probably isn't you. >> again, that's a poke. there's not a lot of money behind it. it is airing in milwaukee, so people in paul ryan's district see it. it's the democrats' way of saying, you try to make nancy pelosi the issue? we won. ha-ha, mr. speaker. we're talking about this during the break. a lot of republicans publicly seem to be in denial. when you talk to the smart ones privately, they get it. actually, a lot of think the house is gone. they almost think there's nothing they can do between now and november. >> this should have been a gimme election. this is one that trump won by 20 points. if youpg about it, there are something like 75 to 100 districts around the country that are even more competitive for republicans, more democratic leaning. so if they're having an issue here, they're obviously going to have a huge issue in the midterms. another big thing was pelosi.

the nancy pelosi bogeyman strategy was one of the top strategies that republicans had laid out. they had sort of counted on this notion that they can go back to their districts and say, vote for me or vote for a republican, or you're going to have a potential speaker nancy pelosi again. and nobody wants that, is what they're going to say. but conor lamb showed that he's not afraid to basically throe pelosi under the bus. i would expect a lot of democratic challengers to start doing that. that really undercuts a top strategy for republicans. >> that dynamic pulled together quite well. our friend, two great political reporters. they talked to a number of democrats who have gone on the record, which is rare. after this election, more democrats now wait to go on the record, saying, run from nancy. maybe she won't be the leader. but that's an internal democratic dynamic. the yes is, you know, is it enough? republicans can celebrate that, but they just lost. >> right, she used to be sort of the big shiny object. donald trump is a much bigger energizing factor for democrats and independents probably than she is. but if it was just pennsylvania 18, this would all be overplobl.

because democrats do not have that many people like conor lamb. he's a unique figure in many respects. central casting, without question. there is so much more going on here at play. and republicans, if you talk to them in some of those red zr districts like you talked about are very worried about this. the question is, what does the president do? is the best use of his time to be behind closed doors at fund-raisers or out there on rallies? he's clearly synergy ienergizin other side as well. he wants to be out there in the fight, in the mix. unclear if it's helpful. >> part because when he goes out and campaigns for these folks, he's not talking about them. does an hour-long rally and barely mentions their name. mentions ten different things that could be really controversial and drive a news cycle for another week or so and where does it leave thal candidate? it can have the aeseffect of e y

energizing democrats. >> the suburban revolt, we saw it in new jersey, in alabama. alabama has a democratic senator. alabama has a democratic senator because of the suburban revolt against president donald trump. we saw it again in pennsylvania 18. the "national review" calls it this way, talking about the coming shellacking in 2018. there's essentially only one issue on their minds this year, it's the personality, stupid. the chernobyl cloud of noxious presidential behavior is poisoning the party from coast to coast. that -- talk to any republican involved in a race who does folk groups, especially in the suburbs, and they might not use that language, but we would agree. >> and trump cuts both ways for a lot of republicans. look what happened with dean heller in nevada last week. at one point last year, he looked like he was going to be a thorn in the president's side, and then the president threatened to go after him. then he starts to fall into line behind the president, really backed his agenda, stopped criticizing him. and what did the president do to reward him last week? he cleared out his primary field by convincing his primary

challenger to instead run for the house instead of against him. and that helped probably going to help at least his re-election chances by not having to shift very far to the right. so the president, they do need him ultimately to help with the base and help with some of their primaries. >> let's show the president's tweet. i want to put the tweet up there. it was an interesting move by the president. who steve bannon when he was in the white house was encouraging challengers. so the bannon era in the trump white house is over. you see this tweet from the president, it would be great for the people of nevada and unity if good guy danny tarkanan would run for congress and dean heller, who is doing a really good job, could run for senate unopposed. that means the mcconnell team got to him and said, sir, we're going to lose the out, you better not cost us the senate.

>> and stay out of primaries. one thing, pennsylvania 18 doesn't tell us, is democratic primaries. there simply isn't enough oxygen here with the president. the addidemocratic party is goi through its own identity situation, crisis, whatever. so if progressives win a lot of democratic primaries, that could help republicans, of course. that is something to keep an eye on, which democratic candidates emerge. there wasn't a primary, of course, in pennsylvania 18. democrats have some issues of their own. certainly, though, not as many as republicans. >> that's the thing, if you talk to republicans about the one way they can hold on to the house this year, as things are lacking so dire for them is the primaries nominating far-left candidates. . and if they can get their message back on the tax law, which they believe can ultimately deliver them the president or keep the house and keep the senate. but, of course, the constant controversies out of washington, the president constantly undercutting their message on taxes, and as you said, when he goes on the campaign trail, he doesn't talk about that, he

talks about a whole wide range of issues. >> there's been almost no oxygen for the tax bill. when was the last time you actually saw something tonight tax bill breaking through either nationally or in a race right now? >> it's not from lack of trying. we talk about it in every single press conference. >> if you're mitch mcconnell, you say, todd akin, christine o'donnell could have been the majority leader earlier. in the first tea party cycle of 2010 had we not done some things. that's his argument to the president about not getting involved. we'll see early this year if pennsylvania sends us a fascinating message. a long way to go. up next, the president tries a new tactic to silence the porn actress, stormy daniels. and a boutique salon a place with all day arts and crafts it even has a day spa a place that's so much like home, because well... it is home home instead senior care

when you need personalized care in the comfort of home. -ahh. -the new guy. -whoa, he looks -- -he looks exactly like me. -no. -separated at birth much? we should switch name tags, and no one would know who was who. jamie, you seriously think you look like him? uh, i'm pretty good with comparisons. like how progressive helps people save money by comparing rates, even if we're not the lowest. even if we're not the lowest. whoa! wow. i mean, the outfit helps, but pretty great. look at us. wow. i mean, the outfit helps, but pretty great. how'd i get this yard? behind pete's great looking yard, is his secret weapon... the scotts turf builder program. it's the best way to get the yard you want

all year long, guaranteed. all it takes is 4 feedings, with a scotts solution for every season. and with a customized plan from the scotts my lawn app, your yard can look like pete's. it's that easy. this is a scotts yard. download the scotts my lawn app for your personalized plan. ♪ [cheers] that's all it takes? guess i'll bring a can of this stuff everywhere. yeah! then i'll become the world's best dad. made with real cream. reddi-wip. instant greatification.

♪ made with real cream. the fastest samsung ever demands t-mobile, the fastest network ever. right now get the new samsung galaxy s9 for half off. ♪ brushing only reaches 25% of your mouth. listerine® cleans virtually 100%. helping to prevent gum disease and bad breath. never settle for 25%. always go for 100. bring out the bold™ i needthat's whenvice foi remembered that my ex-ex- ex-boyfriend actually went to law school, so i called him. he didn't call me back! if your ex-ex- ex-boyfriend isn't a lawyer, call legalzoom and we'll connect you with an attorney. legalzoom. where life meets legal. discover card. i justis this for real?match, yep. we match all the cash back new cardmembers earn at the end of their first year, automatically. whoo! i got my money! hard to contain yourself, isn't it? uh huh!

let it go! whoo! get a dollar-for-dollar match at the end of your first year. only from discover. hi, kids! i'm carl and i'm a broker. do you offer $4.95 online equity trades? great question. see, for a full service brokerage like ours, that's tough to do. schwab does it. next question. do you offer a satisfaction guarantee? a what now? a satisfaction guarantee. like schwab does. what are you teaching these kids? ask your broker if they offer award-winning full service and low costs, backed by a satisfaction guarantee. if you don't like their answer, ask again at schwab. and low costs, backed by a satisfaction guarantee. [ digital voice ] my friends call me "hack daddy." mos[ evil laugh ]rs. but then cdw orchestrated a network transformation using cisco digital network architecture. allowing scalability and providing fast, comprehensive security from intruders like me. luckily i found a new calling. faster. security transformation by cisco. just run. run like you know how to run.

it orchestration by cdw. ♪ hope you're enjoying nor sunday morning. the president of the united states spending it attacking special counsel robert mueller, the former fbi director, james comey, andrew mccabe, anyone who might be providing testimony against the president in the special counsel investigation. i want to read you something from the president tweeted just moments ago. why does the mueller team have 13 hardened democrats, some big crooked hillary supporters and zero republicans. another dem recently added, does anyone think this is fair, and yet there is no collusion. again another tweet from the president of the united states that flunks the fact check. bob mueller is a republican. the special counsel is a republican. served as fbi director, served in democrat and republican administrations, but is a prosecutor with a republican pedigree. everything he does is approved by a republican, deputy attorney

general, rod rosenstein. the president again trying to undermine the credibility of the special counsel. the question is, what does he know that we don't know? all of that playing out, attacks on the special counsel, the integrity of the russia meddling investigation as the president is now also directly involved in efforts to silence the porn actress, stormy daniels. the president filed legal papers friday trying to move her lawsuit from a state court to federal court. daniels claiming that she had an intimate relationship with the president for several months, starting in 2006. her california lawsuits asks that a nondisclosure agreement being ruled invalid because donald trump never signed it. the aggressive new response from the president and one of his poer personal attorneys says daniels should be forced to pay as much as $20 million for speaking out. and it asks that the fight be sent to private arbitration, taken out of the public legal system. >> they are trying to hide the facts and the truth from the public. it is clear as day. it is part of the process by which they want to muzzle my

client. >> so two issues that involve lawyers. let's start with stormy daniels here. i want to circle back to the attacks on the special counsel, because i think they're important. but in this stormy daniels case here, the president now directly involved. before, the white house said, this relationship never happened. sarah sanders did disclose that one attorney representing the president went to an arbitration hearing. now the president's directly involved in attorney filing papers on behalf of the president of the united states. saying, take this to federal court and asking the federal court to accepted it back to b arbitration. >> this effescalates it dramatically from what the white house had been saying. it was asked and answered in the 2016 campaign. it hadn't been. the president now being directly involved in this means he will be asked about this directly. he is still yet to be asked directly, because he doesn't have press conferences or give interviews, he is yet to be asked about this directly. he, of course, will be. we'll see what his reaction will be to all of this. but i'm not sure that voters actually -- his supporters

certainly don't mind this. other voters, he is not a choir boy. but in a legal sense, what does this mean for him legally if he's ever deposed or anything? i think it's become more significant. otherwise, they wouldn't have weighed in like this. >> i want to show and some people will find this distasteful, especially on a sunday morning, this is the cover of new yorker. you're right, trump core supporters are probably saying, whatever, not a choir boy. but at a time when we know more than six in ten american women disapprove of his performance as president, when we have seen the elections so far, the continuation of this story and images like that, sorry, incredibly politically damaging to the president. and then raises a big legal question. if her case gets standing, if they don't move it to federal court and gets standing, could be depositions. >> it also raises a question of, why would they need to sue stormy daniels to talk about $20 million to talk about something that never happened? >> nice question you raised there. >> slander or something like that, you know? >> right. well, i just think it's a test case, too. because clearly something happened and there was an agreement, she was paid money to

stay silent. and now, you know, her lawyer and she want to talk about something that they took money for to not talk about. if there are other women, if there are other cases, if this dwoez through and she is able to work out some sort of deal where she's able to talk, other women who have this sort of agreement might come forward, if there are other women, and her lawyer suggests its. >> she's trying to undercut the whole trump strategy, not just as it relates to women, but broadly, trump has used ndas throughout his career to try to tamp down things that are embarrassing, that could be in this case political lly damagin to him. and i think there's a fear if one of these ndas falls apart, it could open the floodgates. and what does that do his spott support? one woman coming forward won't probably hurt, but does a broad brush? >> and then one quick point, "why does the mueller team have 13 hardened democrats"? a day and a half the attorney general fired the deputy director, is this a sign that

the president of the united states would actually take the step of firing bob mueller or firing rod rosenstein, the deputy attorney general who i a proves everything he does, including these subpoenas for trump family business records? >> i think it's certainly possible. i mean, this new, more confrontational approach is something we haven't seen the president do. usually when he criticizes the witch hunt, he doesn't directly go after bob mueller. this comes in the wake of those subpoenas issued to the trump organization, perhaps that got under the president's skin. >> and negotiations about testifying. >> exactly. >> in which mueller has been pushing back to the president's lawyers who essentially want a softball set or a limited set of questions, and mueller has been pushing back. >> exactly. and we don't know. the president has said, i want to talk, i want to have this conversation. his lawyers do not want him to have this conversation. one theory that's floating around, if he's not going to fire him directly, maybe he can get a new attorney general to do it. if the president is still in a

firing mood, if jeff sessions were out, there is a line of thought that scott pruitt, the epa director, could become acting attorney general and could make moves at the justice department. it's something that's being discussed at the white house, in the early phases here, but if the president is in a firing ei mood here, perhaps this week ahead could be an even more explosive one. >> then there must not be silence from republican leadership, that would go from embarrassing to shameful. up next, our reporters share notes from their notebooks. why the president's big meeting with the north korean dictator might be slipping. get it for jean who's always cold. for the sales team, it and the warehouse crew. give us the data we need. in one place, anywhere we need it. help us do our jobs better. with domo we can run this place together. well that's that's your job i guess.

♪ at a comfort inn with a glow taround them, so people watching will be like, "wow, maybe i'll glow too if i book direct at choicehotels.com." who glows? just say, badda book. badda boom. book now at choicehotels.com.

we know that when you're >> tspending time with thelass grandkids... ♪ music >> tech: ...every minute counts. and you don't have time for a cracked windshield. that's why at safelite, we'll show you exactly when we'll be there. with a replacement you can trust. all done sir. >> grandpa: looks great! >> tech: thanks for choosing safelite. >> grandpa: thank you! >> child: bye! >> tech: bye! saving you time... so you can keep saving the world. >> kids: ♪ safelite repair, safelite replace ♪ at&t gives you more for your thing. your me-time thing. that sunday night date night with hbo allllllll night thing. that island without men or children would be nice to visit thing. buy an at&t unlimited plan, and get hbo included.

more for your thing that's our thing.

let's head one last time around the "inside politics" table and ask our great reporters to share a little something from their notebooks and help get you out ahead of the big political news just around the corner. julie krpace? >> if you thought the outcry

over the president's tariffs was intense, get ready for the next economic proposal he's considering. these would be broad tariffs on chinese imports. both republican and business groups are bracing for tariffs that would hit everything from electronics to apparel. really all consumer goods that are imported from china if scope of what the white house is considering is still under debate right now. obviously, the president has been known to back off some of these issues before, but the chamber of commerce last week put out a pretty extraordinary statement that said that this kind of tariff could end up hitting the u.s. with $60 billion that would be passed down to consumers. they say that would be devastating for the u.s. economy. >> welcome to the white house, larry kudlow. manu? >> last week, we saw the break down of the house intelligence committee's russia investigation, after republicans said that there was no more to investigate. they concluded, there was no collusion between the trump campaign and russian officials. they also said that the intelligence community's assessment that vladimir putin tried to help trump win the election, they could not validate that.

well, on the senate side, you may eventually see a similar split emerge. last week, i talked to both mark warner, the top democrat in the committee, richard burr, chairman of the committee. burr told me that he has not seen collusion yet in this investigation. he also said that the intelligence community's assessment also, at this point, cannot be substantiated. and that is much different than what we're hearing from mark warner. he said, there are growing questions and signs of possible collusion. he also says that there's nothing to doubt the intelligence community's january assessment. and the two men are at odds over whether or not to bring back some of these trump soerassocia like richard cohen. while the senate committee will do something on a bipartisan basis as soon as this week to try to shore up election security, those big questions about collusion and whether russia tried to help donald trump win the presidency, they're not on the same page, yet. >> yes, maybe, never. jeff? >> it's been about a week and a

half or so since the president stuck his head into the white house briefing room, surprising all of us, saying that talks with the regime of kim jong-un are on. what has happened since then? there's been no public acknowledgement of this, with except we are seeing movement this morning. so certainly, very interesting here. is sweden playing a role? but at the white house specifically, they have shifted the time frame back a bit. they were saying this meeting should happen by may. now they're saying by the end of may. but still, this is very important. but confirmation hearings are going to play a role in all of this. mike pompeo at the ceo is playing a lead role in this. of course, he's also going to be busy in his new job as secretary of state, possibly, these confirmation hearings may hold all of this. the question here is, is the president going to be embarrassed if this meeting does not happen? the white house says, absolutely not, because he's trying something. but keep an eye on that date. it may keep slipping here. but this is, again, one of the most fascinating real things that's going on inside the white house. >> worth watching every day.

rachel? >> there is another covert spending war brewing on capitol hill right now. but this time, trump is taking on his own party and very quietly. so government funding runs out this friday. right now the president in recent days has been calling speaker paul ryan and majority leader mitch mcconnell to say he wants his wall money in there and is willing to do a short-term daca deal. the republicans are telling him, there's no way democrats are going to agree to this right now, just drop it. and he's not listening at this point. another point of this is the new york gateway project, which is this big infrastructure plan that trump promised new jersey and new york republicans just a few months ago, that he was going to fund. and now he's taking it off the table. peter king, a republican from new york, told me he used the irish lunch this week to basically elbow trump on this and say, mr. president, you promised me you were going to do this. please keep your word on this. that could be a math problem on the floor. >> midterm election funds,

still, and a big week ahead. we'll watch that. it is only mid-march, but new hampshire having a little 2020 buzz these days. president trump visits monday to discuss his ideas to combat the opioid crisis. arizona senator jeff flake was there on friday. he's a fierce conservative critic of the president, and was well-received while testing the first in the nation primary waters. and that's not enough. ohio governor john kasich, due for two days in early april. the state has a strong anti-trump republican camp, but yet, also has quite a vocal pro-trump core. so a challenge would be a very steep hill. one key would be attracting independents to cross over and vote in the republican primary. that's down the road a couple of years. another more important right now might be winning the backing of the conservative union leader newspaper. its outspoken publisher is not a trump fan, to say the least. and republicans in the state who want to see a tough 2020 primary challenge to the president are watching now to see how much the union leader wants to stir the pot. 2020, yes, keep an eye on that. that's it for "inside politics." thanks for sharing your sunday

morning. hope you can catch us weekdays as well. we'll be here tomorrow, as well pup ne . up next, "state of the union" with jake tapper. have a great sunday. there are two types of people in the world. those who fear the future... and those who embrace it. the future is for the unafraid. ♪ ♪ the future is for the unafraid. my healthy routine helps me feel my best. so i add activia yogurt to my day. with its billions of live and active probiotics, activia may help support my digestive health, so i can take on my day. activia. now in probiotic dailies. mvo: we had support from the synagogue, the churches. ♪ when disaster strikes to one,

we all get together and support each other. that's the nature of humanity. ♪ i'll stand by you. ♪ i'll stand by you. ♪ and i'll never desert you. ♪ i'll stand by you. about type 2 diabetes.with some surprising facts so you have type 2 diabetes, right? yeah. yes i do. okay so you diet, you exercise, you manage your a1c? that's the plan. what about your heart? what do you mean my heart? the truth is, type 2 diabetes can make you twice as likely to die from a cardiovascular event, like a heart attack or stroke. and with heart disease, your risk is even higher. but wait, there's good news for adults who have type 2 diabetes and heart disease.

jardiance is the only type 2 diabetes pill with a lifesaving cardiovascular benefit. jardiance is proven to both significantly reduce the chance of dying from a cardiovascular event in adults who have type 2 diabetes and heart disease alower your a1c. jardiance can cause serious side effects including dehydration. this may cause you to feel dizzy, faint, or lightheaded, or weak upon standing. ketoacidosis is a serious side effect that may be fatal. symptoms include nausea, vomiting, stomach pain, tiredness, and trouble breathing. stop taking jardiance and call your doctor right away if you have symptoms of ketoacidosis or an allergic reaction. symptoms of an allergic reaction include rash, swelling, and difficulty breathing or swallowing. do not take jardiance if you are on dialysis or have severe kidney problems. other side effects are sudden kidney problems, genital yeast infections, increased bad cholesterol, and urinary tract infections, which may be serious. taking jardiance with a sulfonylurea or insulin may cause low blood sugar. tell your doctor about all the medicines you take and if you have any medical conditions. so-you still just thinking about your a1c? well no, i'm also thinking about my heart. now it's your turn to ask the serious questions.

ask your doctor about jardiance. and get to the heart of what matters. with pg&e in the sierras. and i'm an arborist since the onset of the drought, more than 129 million trees have died in california. pg&e prunes and removes over a million trees every year to ensure that hazardous trees

can't impact power lines. and since the onset of the drought we've doubled our efforts. i grew up in the forests out in this area and honestly it's heartbreaking to see all these trees dying. what guides me is ensuring that the public is going to be safer and that these forests can be sustained and enjoyed by the community in the future. mccabe is out. president trump is celebrating the firing of the ex-fbi deputy director. now the president's attorney is calling for an end to the russia probe. >> i am concerned. >> one of the president's most outspoken critics in the republican party, senator jeff flake, responds, next. plus, battle brewing? president trump's picks for