internet providers promise business owners a lot. let's see who delivers more. comcast business offers fast gig-speeds across our network. at&t doesn't. we offer more complete reliability with up to 8 hours of 4g wireless network backup. at&t, no way. we offer 35 voice features and solutions that grow with your business. at&t, not so much. we give you 75 mbps for $59.95. that's more speed than at&t's comparable bundle, for less. call today. good evening. we begin tonight keeping them honest with the president's recent actions aimed at undermining the institutions that he believes threaten him.

it's a pattern of course we have seen before. in fact, it's president trump's go-to move and has been dating back to before the campaign when a person or institution stands in his way, he seeks to diminish or delegitimize or otherwise dirty up that person or institution u which is one thing when you're calling gossip columnists from trump tower pretending to an a publicist. it's another thing when you're attacking the country's bed rook institutions from the white house as president. that's when it goes from amusing to arguably dangerous, especially when lawmakers choose not to use the power the voters have given them to address that danger. republicans mostly who have chosen only to talk about it, not act. that's where we are tonight. when we left you friday night, attorney general sessions had just fired andrew mccabe, the deputy fbi director, who was about 26 hours short of retirement. it remains to be seen what mr. mccabe has done wrong. the inspector general's report has yet to come out. what followed mccabe's firing was the president of the united states, for all intents and

europe ps, doing a victory dance on the man's professional grave and using mccabe to try to discredit james comey and the mueller investigation. andrew mccabe fired, he tweeted late friday night. a great day for the hardworking men and women of the fbi, a great day for democracy. sanctimonious james comey was his boss and made mccabe look like a choir boy. he knew all about the lies and corruption going on at the highwaye highest levels of the fbi. with that, the president was off to the races. fo for the first time attacking mueller by name. saturday evening he tweeted the mueller probe should never have been started in this there was no collusion and no crime. it was based on fraudulent activities and a fake dossier. sunday he tweeted, why does the mueller team have 13 hardened democrats, crooked hillary

reporters and zero republicans. according to a fact check by "the washington post," 13 of these 17 members of mueller's team have previously registered as democrats while four had no affiliation or their affiliation could not be found. robert mueller is a republican. nine members of mueller's team have donated to democrats. the bigger donor to democrats, attorney james quarrels, also gave to republicans, jason chaffetz and george allen. as a private citizen, donald trump gave money to then senator hillary clinton. attempting to undermine the legitimacy of the investigators shouldn't be surprising. he's been undermining the larger institution now for months. >> well, it's a shame what's happened with the fbi, but we're going to rebuild the fbi. it will be bigger and better than ever. but it is very sad when you look at those documents and how they've done that is really, really disgraceful. and you have a lot of very angry people that are seeing it.

it's a very sad thing to watch. i will tell you that. >> that was back in december and the pattern of course continues. today he brought in a new member of his legal team, joseph digenova, who you might remember for pushing some conspiracy theories about the fbi trying to prevent the president's election. >> they tried to frame an incoming president with a false russian conspiracy that never existed, and they knew it, and they plotted to ruin him as a candidate and then destroy him as a president. >> which is essentially the president's complaint. the investigation of him, his campaign, his administration isn't a reflection on any facts in the case. all the indictments and guilty pleas notwithstanding. instead it's about the corruption of the organizations investigating him. the system he says is rigged, and you might have heard that before. >> the process is rigged. this whole election is being rigged. watch the polls because this is part of the crooked system.

it's part of the rigged system that i've been talking about since i entered the race. i understand it. it's a rigged system. they put out phony polls. i'm afraid the election's going to be rigged. i have to be honest because i think my side was rigged. >> the system is crooked, he said. the system is rigged. the way we've elected presidents for two centuries is now something to be doubted, to be questioned, minus any actual evidence all because one candidate at one moment in time was afraid of losing party of a pattern just as it was with another institution, the press, which literally made donald trump famous. >> the media is really the word -- i think one of the greatest of all terms i've come up with is fake. i guess other people have used it perhaps over the years, but i've never noticed it. and it's a shame. and they really hurt the country because they take away the spirit of the country. >> candidate and now president trump unlike any president since nixon really has puckblicly tri

to delegitimize the press. he first cast doubt on and then cast off his secretary of state and has presided over a blood bath in the diplomatic core. >> i am disappointed in the attorney general. he should not have recused himself almost immediately after he took office. and if he was going to recuse himself, he should have told me prior to taking office, and i would have quite simply picked somebody else. >> so the question is do the non-political professionals at the fbi, the justice department, and all other agencies look at all this and get a certain message, that they are in so many words illegitimate or even sub verse in. against that backdrop of alleged plotting against the president are his new attacks on robert mueller ral so surprising? today one of his spokespeople tried to tamp down concerns that the president is gearing up to actually fire mueller. >> it's pretty clear that there

are no conversations or discussions about removing mr. mueller. at the same time, there has been no collusion. the president has said multiple times. obviously i think what you guys have seen is some well established frustration on behalf of the president. more than a year this has been going on. he believes this is the biggest witch hunt in history. again, i refer you back to the statement. the president is not moving to get rid of robert mueller. >> the president's tweets belie that. so is his hiring of joseph digenova. so does his long-standing pattern of behavior and so does the reaction from fellow republicans who warned it would be dangerous or even politically suicidal to fire mueller but are doing nothing to actually stop it. that includes the house intelligence committee. on top of all that, there's breaking news about any interview with robert mueller the president may eventually submit it.

gloria boj gloria borger joins us on that shortly. congressman jim himes joins us now. when you look at these criticisms from the president, do you think he's laying the ground work to fire mule center. >> you know, we've seen this pattern over and over again. you get the denial right up until the moment it happens. it might be the firing of comey or tillerson. they're always prefaced by tweets primarily. you know, as much as i appreciate the staff members at the white house saying that there are no plans to fire mueller, i think it's well established at this point that the staff doesn't know what the president is going to do during executive time in the morning when he's watching tv and has his fingers on a tweet. if the white house stories are to be believed, tillerson got fired by twitter without much consideration. so i don't put a lot of stock in the notion that there aren't conversations at this point. >> last news when it was reported that the president was thinking about hiring another

attorney, i think he tweeted out it was fake news. now we know he's hiring this lawyer, joseph digenova, who is being added to the president's legal team. what do you think his hiring signals, given the kind of conspiracy theories he's peddled in the past? >> when you listen to this attorney, digenova, conspiracy theories is exactly right. all i can surmise -- and this again is part of a pattern with this president -- is that he is looking to surround himself not with people who would tell him what trey gowdy suggested, republican on the intelligence committee, when he said, if you're innocent, act it. i think he's looking for people who will buttress his pre-existing ideas. and i'm not sure that's a healthy thing, particularly on your legal team. >> senator lindsey graham over the weekend said if the president were to fire mueller, it would be, quote, the beginning of the end of his presidency. is there any real appetite you're hearing from your republican colleagues to take legislative measures to protect the special counsel? >> no, there isn't, and i really worry about this, anderson.

the dynamics are very clear. all of -- not all, but almost all of my republican colleagues recognize that if somebody were to do the courageous thing and come out and say this is completely unacceptable. we're a rule of law country. as a republican, as much as i admire, the president, i will support the special counsel's office, that's a tweet the next morning that guarantees that that republican probably loses a primary. and of course we're in primary season. so the politics right now are such -- and i'm not usually a pessimist, but the politics are such that if this president were to do what you need to do to fire the special counsel, i'm not sure you would see a reaction from the republican congress. >> lastly, what is the status of the final house intelligence committee report on russian meddling and will the democratic findings be a part of that report or a separate democratic document? >> well, it's fluid still, anderson. but we are supposed to meet this week to vote on the release of this report. i understand that may happen thursday. i imagine that will be a party line vote. i have read the report almost in its entirety, and it was not

something we participated in. i think it's not a fair document. i think it's full of factual errors. i think it will be a partisan vote. of course then there is a process of declassification. that could take weeks if not months. >> congressman himes, appreciate your time. in a moment, we'll talk to a republican member of the house judiciary committee, but first our political and legal team, john dean, gloria borger, and investigative reporter carl bernstein. gloria, i understand you have some new information on the legal team? >> yes, we do. my colleague, pamela brown and i have discovered for the first time in a long time, the two sides, mueller's team and president trump's legal team, sat down last week. and what they discussed really added some granularity to what mueller is interested in. this may well have been what set the president off. of course we know they've always been interested in the firing of james comey, but this time

around, for instance, we've learned that the prosecutor said that they would ask the president about attorney general jeff sessions' involvement in the comey firing and what the president actually knew about national security adviser michael flynn's phone calls with russian ambassador kislyak. that was in late december 2016. so you can imagine that this was not sort of welcome news from the president, and it really makes it clear that mueller's team is not wrapping up their investigation. >> anytime soon. i mean it's interesting the president's tweet -- this weekend tweet, the statement by john dowd, now the addition of digenova, what do you make of it? >> i think dowd first of all would not have tweeted that without the president knowing about it. i think it was one of those trial balloons that fell flat. and i think it reflects that the strategy may be moving into a new phase. you have an increasingly agitated president. we've reported that he's calling

friends, and he's upset, and he doesn't -- he thinks his lawyers got it wrong. >> mm-hmm. >> and he wants to know how to fight back. digenova is a former u.s. attorney who is very aggressive. john dowd has been, let's cooperate. so i think this takes us tiinto new phase and the president clearly wants to start punching. >> carl, do you believe the president is laying the ground work to dispute the conclusions of the mueller probe? >> i think it's really the people who know him best, not me, that we want to listen to here. and the people i talk to who know him best believe he is determined to shut down this investigation, to ultimately see that mueller is fired. but more than that, that there is no report that really goes to the haeart of his conduct, trump's conduct, the conduct of his business organization. he wants this to go away on his terms. he sees this as part of a great

battle in this cold civil war going on in this country today. and this is a great battle about the survival of his presidency from his point of view, and he knows it. and he is waging a scorched earth battle to make sure that he prevails here with his base and that the republicans in congress particularly inspired and held hostage to some extent by the base, hold the republicans in congress to the fire. >> john dean, occasionally we've raised the specter of what president nixon would have done with twitter. are you surprised president trump has started going after mueller by name? >> i am not. what i think we're witnessing is a very public obstruction of justice. he, as i see it, has already exceeded everything that nixon did. he's really much more intimately involved than nixon ever was in the cover ju-upcover-up. nixon, the first eight months of watergate just learns a little

bit now and then from his chief of staff bob haldeman. he's not really in it. it's later when things get hotter that he gets hands-on. but trump, from the very beginning, he's involved in this. so i see a very different profile, and the big difference being nixon was behind closed doors, so everyone was surprised when there were recordings of it. trump is just right out front on it, and he's doing it very publicly. >> that's a pretty stunning statement. i just want to have you repeat that. you're saying in your opinion, donald trump has gone farther than richard nixon did to obstruct justice? >> that's exactly what i'm saying. i think trump is nixon on steroids and stilts. >> carl, i got to get you in. do you agree with that? >> i think there is no question that he has presided over a cover-up from day one. the question is what is the criminality of the cover-up that he is presiding over, and that's why we have a special

prosecutor. but there is no question whatsoever that he has sought at every turn. look at the lies that he has told from the beginning. he has rarely been truthful about any matter involved in the whole russian investigation. trey gowdy has got it exactly right. mr. president, if you are innocent, including of collusion, why are you acting the way you have been acting? and so his only recourse and what we are seeing now is to go to his base and get them exercised that this is a witch hunt, which it is not. this is a legitimate investigation. really, if there were a witch hunt going on, there are plenty of provisions that after this investigation is over, if it is allowed to run its course, there ought to be any serious punishment should happen for malfeasance or misfazance, including going to jail for investigators in the fbi or the special prosecutor's office who

have abused their authority. but that's not where we are. >> i got to get a break in. we're going to continue the discussion next. later, word that a major american city, austin, texas, is now under attack from what authorities call a serial bomber who seems to be on a deadly learning curve with bomb number four. you'll ask... what bad shoulder? what headache? advil is relief that's fast strength that lasts you'll ask... what pain? with advil liqui-gels let your inner light loose with one a day women's. ♪ a complete multivitamin specially formulated with key nutrients plus vitamin d for bone health support. your one a day is showing.

♪ ♪ the fastest samsung ever demands t-mobile, the fastest network ever. because fast should be fast. ♪ right now get the new samsung galaxy s9 for half off. ♪ they have businesses to run they have passions to pursue how do they avoid trips to the post office? stamps.com mail letters

ship packages all the amazing services of the post office right on your computer get a 4 week trial plus $100 in extras including postage and a digital scale go to stamps.com/tv and never go to the post office again go to stamps.com/tv and never go to 3 toddlers won't stop him.. and neither will lower back pain. because at a dr. scholl's kiosk he got a recommendation for our custom fit orthotic to relieve his foot, knee, or lower back pain, from being on his feet. dr. scholl's. born to move. others who felt whoa connection. it. many more who never saw it coming. but now they know... they descend from the people of ireland.

in fact, more than half of our community have discovered their irish roots... which means your smiling eyes might be irish too. order ancestrydna and find the surprises in you. just $69 through monday. get your kit today. the breaking news in the russia probe which gloria boncher just reported, attorneys on both sides sat down in a face to face discussion about the top topics. john dean now believes president trump's obstruction of justice outweighs nixon's. back now with the panel. gloria, you were talking about this during the break. you know, nixon, really didn't learn about it until the tapes and it was all in private. >> this is different. this is donald trump publicly saying what he's telling his advisers privately. there's no secret here that he wants mueller gone.

th they are holding him back, but he wants him gone. the question is when you talk to attorneys, you talk to people, well, a, he's allowed to fire these people. and, b, he's not quietly -- you can obstruct in public, i presume. but he's doing this very publicly. there may be other things he's doing that we don't obviously know about, and that is what mueller is looking into, particularly in these questions, for example, about what trump knew about general flynn's conversations with ambassador kislyak. did trump try and cover that up when he said he first learned about those conversations from the vice president, mike pence? so this has to unravel here. >> john dean, when president trump uses the term witch hunt, i just want to put up a headline from "the washington post" from july of 1973. nixon sees witch hunt, insiders say. what parallels do you draw? as we've said before, president trump according to michael

wolff's book goes into a sort of rage whenever he sees you on tv. what sort of parallels do you see here? >> i tweeted that when i saw that headline too. what i see, as i say, one is private. the other's public. you've got to remember, anderson, that the obstruction statute, if you're looking at the criminal law, is an endeavor statute. all you have to do is have a corrupt motive and a corrupt intent and make overt acts towards that intent, and you're on the wrong side of that law. it's not very hard. trump is going to be judged not only that, but on a political standard. and if i look at the bill of impeachment that nixon was held up to during the house judiciary committee's impeachment proceedings, you'll see right now trump is far more aggressive than nixon in what's listed in that bill of impeachment. >> carl, i mean, you have congressman trey gowdy, arguably one of hillary clinton's gop

foes, saying president trump is not acting like an innocent man. it's interesting what republican member who's aren't running for re-election are willing to say. >> the terrible thing is that the republican party in congress has been craven throughout this administration about saying we believe in the rule of law above partisan and ideological politics. the result is that this president is taking the country headlong toward a constitutional crisis. that's where those around him once again believe he's willing to provoke a constitutional crisis. he's willing, if need be perhaps, to face impeachment because he does not want the truth to come out about what has occurred here. and it's not just about obstruction. there are suggestions in what we've seen so far from the indictments and other information that there may well have been collusion. we don't know to what level it rises and whether it rises to the level of donald trump or his

family. but certainly the special prosecutor is putting dots together. and why we should believe at this point donald trump when he says there's been no collusion when everything else practically that he has said in this matter has been shown to be false goes back to trey gowdy's statement. act like an innocent person. say, i'm an open book. let's have this investigation run its course. and when it's finished, there ought to be an investigation of the investigators because they've abused their power. if, indeed, the investigation is allowed to go forward and the facts come out. he does not want the facts to come out because so far, as we have seen, they are very, very damning about his conduct. >> but, you know, he has said -- and this is what's so interesting. he has said, you know, i want to testify. i'll be happy to testify before the special counsel. what are his lawyers doing right now? they are trying to narrow that testimony if they let it go on

at all to fit through the eye of a needle because they do not want the president to answer multiple questions because they think he might lie. and so you have a president saying, i've got nothing to hide. as carl was saying, he is saying that, except that's not how they're behaving. so what he's trying to do is discredit mueller because if you discredit mueller, then he can say, why would i sit down with that guy? he has no credibility. the fbi has no credibility. this has been a witch hunt all along, and then he can take that to his base, and he can take that to voters, and he can say, you know, i really wanted to, but why would i cooperate with an investigation that's completely corrupt in. >> gloria borger, carl bernstein, john dean, thanks very much. up next, reaction from capitol hill. i'll speak with a republican member of the house judiciary committee about whether he thinks the president is laying the ground work for firing mueller. work for firing

mueller. heyi'm craving somethingkin! we're missing. the ceramides in cerave. they help restore my natural barrier, so i can lock in moisture... and keep us protected. we've got to have each other's backs... and fronts. cerave. what your skin craves. claritin and relief from of non-drowsy symptoms caused by over 200 allergens. like those from buddy. because stuffed animals are clearly no substitute for real ones. feel the clarity and live claritin clear.

thisat red lobsterest. with exciting new dishes like dueling lobster tails and lobster truffle mac & cheese. classics like lobster lover's dream are here too. so enjoy these 10 lobsterlicious dishes while you can because lobsterfest won't last.

if you'd have told me three years ago... that we'd be downloading in seconds, what used to take... minutes. that guests would compliment our wifi. that we could video conference... and do it like that. (snaps) if you'd have told me that i could afford... a gig-speed. a gig-speed network. it's like 20 times faster than what most people have. i'd of said... i'd of said you're dreaming. dreaming! definitely dreaming. then again, dreaming is how i got this far.

now more businesses in more places can afford to dream gig. comcast, building america's largest gig-speed network. a company that the trump campaign used is under scrutiny tonight as it facebook after a bombshell report that the company, cambridge analytica, secretly collected information about millions of facebook users. drew griffin has more. >> reporter: the data firm hired by donald trump's presidential election campaign used secretly obtained information from tens of millions of unsuspecting facebook users to directly

target potential american voters. and according to a whistle-blower now coming forward, the entire operation centered around deception, false grassroots support, and a strategy that seems to border on electronic brainwashing. whistle-blower christopher wylie says the idea to politically weaponize data taken directly from facebook users came from the former vice president of cambridge analytica and former top trump campaign aide steve bannon. >> steve wanted weapons for his culture war. that's what he wanted. and that -- we -- we offered him a way to accomplish what he wanted to do, which was change the culture of america. >> reporter: the personal facebook data came at first from people who were paid to fill out a personality test through an app. what they didn't know was the app allowed researchers to penetrate not only their personal data but then exploited a loophole to access their friends' data. and from that, they built

psychological profiles of 50 million facebook users. facebook now says it was misled, total the information would only be used for academic research. instead it was downloaded by a company that worked with cambridge analytica. listen to how the ceo of that company describes its work. >> by having hundreds and hundreds of thousands of americans undertake this survey, we were able to form a model to predict the personality of every single adult in the united states of america. >> cambridge analytica claims it didn't use any of the facebook data in the 2016 presidential campaign, but their entire enterprise was funded by the politically conservative mercer family and run with help from steve bannon. >> reporter: and people inside the firm say the data did indeed help then-candidate trump shape his campaign strategy and, according to "the new york times," which helped break the story, quote, cambridge performed a variety of services that included designing target audiences for digital ads and fund-raising appeals, modeling

voter turnout, buying $5 million in television ads and determining where mr. trump should travel to best drum p support. christopher wylie says it's time for facebook to come clean and for cambridge analytica to be outed for potentially trying to brainwash the american electorate. >> we were looking at things like drain the swamp. we were looking at imagery of walls and how people engage with that concept. we were looking at suspicions about the deep state. we were looking at all kinds of things that at the time, you know, in 2014 would have sounded slightly fringe or crazy for any political candidate to go on. but what we were finding were, you know, cohorts of americans who really responded to some of these things, and this all got fed back to steve bannon. >> drew griffin joins me now. facebook announced today it would launch an independent internal audit with cambridge analytica. i understand that's already run into problems. >> reporter: yeah, over at the

london offices of cambridge analytica, anderson, the auditors from facebook were there when they were told basically to stand down. the uk information commission wants to do its own investigation, a government investigation, announced it was seeking a warrant and basically told facebook investigators to stand down, to get out. >> at this point is any u.s. government entity investigating what happened? >> reporter: you know, it's very partisan with the u.s. we're getting mostly reaction from democrats. adam schiff wants cambridge analytica's ceo back before the house intelligence committee. but senator ron wyden of oregon sent a very pointed letter, anderson, to mark zuckerberg, turning the attention to facebook itself. very pointed questions asking how this could have happened. what facebook is going to do to protect people's privacy in the future. and it looks like there's pressure building to bring mark zuckerberg to capitol hill to answer some of these questions. >> appreciate it. thanks. fascinating report. coming up next, we're joined by a republican member of the house judiciary committee who says the firing of the fbi

deputy director was justified and says there may be a cabal of fbi agents working against the president. i'm just worried about the house and taking care of the boys. zach! talk to me. it's for the house. i got a job. it's okay. dad took care of us. my gums are irritated. i don't have to worry about that, do i? actually, you do. harmful bacteria lurk just below the gum line, and if you're not taking care of your gums,

you're not taking care of your mouth. so now i use this. crest gum detoxify. introducing new crest gum detoxify... it works below the gum line and is clinically proven to neutralize harmful plaque bacteria and help reverse early gum damage. new gum detoxify, from crest. gums are good. so is my check up! crest. healthy, beautiful smiles for life. stay with me, mr. parker. when a critical patient is far from the hospital,

the hospital must come to the patient. stay with me, mr. parker. the at&t network is helping first responders connect with medical teams in near real time... stay with me, mr. parker. ...saving time when it matters most. stay with me, mrs. parker. that's the power of and.

to keep our community safe. before you do any project big or small, pg&e will come out and mark your gas and electric lines so you don't hit them when you dig. call 811 before you dig, and make sure that you and your neighbors are safe. again the breaking news, despite attacks on the special counsel, his team, and the president's team are talking, discussing topics that investigators might ask the president. meantime, more reaction to the andrew mccabe firing. a republican member of the house judiciary committee says it was, quote, wholly justified.

that's from a statement from congressman matt gates of florida. as we reported, the president spent the weekend tweeting not only about mccabe but about special counsel mueller. i spoke with congressman gaets just before air time. >> i think that the president firing mr. mueller would create a series of conflicts and and downstream effects that would be bad for the country. i think this is the job of the attorney general because they're been no evidence of collusion produced by the special counsel and because there's been a house finding of no collusion in the intelligence committee, i think the attorney general would be right to renounce his recusal, to re-establish command of the democratic of justice, and then to give bob mueller a time period to produce the evidence that he may or may not have regarding collusion. and if he doesn't produce it, let's wrap this up and move on to tax cuts and other important things for the country. >> as you know, the

investigation isn't over for robert mueller, so there's no reason why -- i mean, again, we don't know if there was collusion or not, but there's no reason why at this point he would have charged something on collusion. he seems to be building a number of cases. >> he certainly does. you know, anderson, we're 14 months into the trump presidency. so let's assume that those who are the president's biggest critics are right and that there was collusion. we shouldn't wait any longer to see the evidence. let's find out what the evidence is as we stand here today, and if 14 months into this presidency there isn't evidence of collusion, i think it's important to move on. but of course if the special counsel has evidence, i think every american should be eager to see it. >> i just want to play something that your republican colleague, congressman trey gowdy, said yesterday about mierueller. >> give him the time, the resources, the independence to do his job. when you are innocent, act like it. let it play out its course.

if you've done nothing wrong, you should want the investigation to be as fulsome and thorough as possible. >> is the president acting like he's innocent in all of this? >> i think he is, particularly when he went and gave an impromptu interview to "the new york times" on the record recorded about his views of the investigation. that is not the behavior of guilty people. that's what an innocent person does when they're so frustrated by the fact that there seems to be a counternarrative that you want to go and set the record straight. so i have every expectation that the president will be found innocent in any sincere and unbiased tribunal. but here you've got a group of people who seem to have bias against the president, who have an unlimited amount of power to go after him. and that's where the frustration bubbles up among many conservatives if not mr. gowdy. >> the new lawyer who the president has added to his legal team said that the russia investigation was cooked up by a group of fbi and doj officials intent on, in his words, trying to frame donald trump of a

faul falsely created crime. do you believe that's what happened here, that there's some sort of cabal at the top echelon of the fbi? is that what you're alleging? >> i think we need to look into that question. the fbi and department of justice certainly can't investigate themselves. it's one of the reasons why i've joined congressman lee zeldin and others calling for an independent review of those activities. mr. digenova, certainly a capable attorney, served as u.s. attorney in washington, d.c., and i think there is also evidence in the lisa strzok -- i'm sorry -- the lisa page, peter strzok text messages, particularly the assertion that there was an insurance policy being hatched in andy's office. we assume that is andy mccabe. if those three were together manifesting their bias against the president, then certainly what mr. digenova has said is true. >> this is similar to the argument you used to make about a secret society which was referenced in one of those text messages as well. you now admit that whole secret society thing was -- seemed to be in jest.

once more texts were released, it was evidence it was related to some vladimir putin calendars that were released, yes? >> well, i think it's always reasonable to try to get more context to these claims. it's highly aberrational that you've got two people engaged in an extramarital affair texting in realtime about an investigation of the president of the united states and about an investigation of a presidential candidate like hillary clinton. >> right, but -- >> so, again, it was a reasonable question to wonder why people at the fbi were referencing a secret society. while there may have not been some formal incarnation of that, you may have had the very informal cabal that mr. digenova referenced working against the president. >> you do admit though with the fuller context, it now was just a lighthearted remark, yes? >> look, there still are messages we haven't seen. i think before drawing those conclusi conclusions, we should have a full redaction of the text messages. there are over 1.2 million records the committee has requested. we've received about 3,000 of those records. it may very well be that you had

an informal cabal functioning in secret with a societal goal of hurting president trump without any evidence. >> that sounds like a massive conspiracy theory. >> it may have been a massive conspiracy at play. that's why we want a special counsel to look at these things. look, when you've got the fbi saying that it's wise to go and fire mr. mccabe, who was one of the senior officials at the fbi, you have got sufficient smoke to believe there is fire that exists. and that's why we're asking the tough questions. it's why we want to have an independent review of the activities of the fbi and department of justice and the fisa process and the clinton foundation and the clinton e-mail scandals, and i think there mccabe's firing validates many of the concerns that i've raised along with many of my colleagues. >> you said the fbi can't investigate itself. as you just said, it was an fbi review which called for mccabe to be fired. >> it was. but that was the office of the inspector general. the difference as it relates to the fisa matter, anderson, is there can be no charges brought. you see, the inspector general

cannot actually impanel a grand jury and bring charges. so that's why we need a second special counsel potentially to be able to take the work of the inspector general, the work of the congress, and then to be able to present that evidence before a grand jury so that our justice system can work. >> so just so i'm clear, you want to shut down the special counsel robert mueller, who is investigating the president, but create a new special counsel to investigate potential cabal or secret society at the highest echelons of the fbi? >> correct. and the reason that i have those views is that the mueller probe has so many people included in it that won't be able to see beyond their own bias. i'm not suggesting that joseph digenova or any major contributor or supporter of the trump campaign be appointed to look into the fbi or the department of justice. i'm seeking an independent review with people who have not manifested their political activity to the extremes that the people have that are involved with bob mueller. >> appreciate your time. thank you. we had to cut that interview down for time.

we'll post the entire interview online. coming up, the search for a suspected serial bomber intensifying in austin, texas, after a fourth explosion in less than a month. i'll speak with the chief of police next. ur water sources is essential to the health of our communities. which is why we're helping to replenish the mighty rio grande as well as over 30 watersheds across the country. we're also leading water projects in more than 100 communities. and for every drop we use... we're working to give one back. because our products rely on the same thing as we all do... clean water. and we care about it like our business depends on it. let your inner light loose with one a day women's. ♪ a complete multivitamin specially formulated with key nutrients plus vitamin d for bone health support. your one a day is showing.

when it comes to travel, i sweat the details. late checkout... ...down-alternative pillows... ...and of course, price. tripadvisor helps you book a... ...hotel without breaking a sweat. because we now instantly... ...search over 200 booking sites ...to find you the lowest price... ...on the hotel you want. don't sweat your booking. tripadvisor. the latest reviews. the lowest prices.

♪ ♪ the fastest samsung ever demands t-mobile, the fastest network ever. because fast should be fast. ♪ right now get the new samsung galaxy s9 for half off. ♪ taking over 7,000 maria's steps each day.o, and she does it in any shoes she wants, with lasting comfort. only dr. scholl's stylish step has insoles that are clinically proven to provide all-day comfort. dr. scholl's. born to move.

we have one to two fires a day and when you respond together and you put your lives on the line, you do have to surround yourself with experts. and for us the expert in gas and electric is pg&e. we run about 2,500/2,800 fire calls a year and on almost every one of those calls pg&e is responding to that call as well. and so when we show up to a fire and pg&e shows up with us it makes a tremendous team during a moment of crisis. i rely on them, the firefighters in this department rely on them, and so we have to practice safety everyday. utilizing pg&e's talent and expertise in that area trains our firefighters on the gas or electric aspect of a fire and when we have an emergency situation we are going to be much more skilled

and prepared to mitigate that emergency for all concerned. the things we do every single day that puts ourselves in harm's way, and to have a partner that is so skilled at what they do is indispensable, and i couldn't ask for a better partner. most of a neighborhood in austin, texas, is on lockdown tonight after a fourth bombing has put the city on edge. police are on the hunt for a suspected serial bomber. i'll speak to the chief of police in austin in a moment. first, why the latest blast has deepened the concern and the mystery. the latest from cnn's nick watt. we're transporting a 22-year-old male patient. >> reporter: two more victims of what austin police are now calling a serial bomber. two men walking down a suburban sidewalk tripped a wire that triggered the blast. >> we've got trip wires there in the grass.

they're going to retrieve and pull them back. >> reporter: the sound of that blast was caught on a home security camera about a half mile away. the victims are described as white men in their early 20s. both suffered significant injuries, leaving nearby residents in this affluent neighborhood shocked. >> before we had to look for a package. now you have to look for everywhere. i mean it's harder to see a wire than it is a package, so that's very scary to me. >> reporter: this city is on edge. three package bombs left overnight on porches have detonated since march 2nd, killing two african-american men and severely injuring an elderly latina woman. it's thought those attacks could have been targeted and possibly racially motivated. but this latest blast appears indiscriminate. >> we're very concerned that with trip wires, a child could be walking down a sidewalk and shut something. >> reporter: police were already hunting a sophisticated bomb maker.

the explosion on sunday shows an even higher level of sophistication. >> we believe that the recent explosive incidents that have occurred in the city of austin were meant to send a message. >> reporter: what message, what motive still unclear. just a few hours before the last bomb was set off, police appealed directly to the bomber. >> and we assure you that we are listening. we want to understand what brought you to this point, and we want to listen to you. we want to talk to you. >> reporter: silence. police are actively appealing to the public for help, raising the reward to six figures for information leading to an arrest. >> we now need the community to have an extra level of vigilance and pay attention to any suspicious device whether it be a package, a bag, a backpack, anything that looks out of place, and do not approach it. >> reporter: nick watt, cnn, austin. >> joining me now, the chief of the austin police department, brian manley, who you just saw

in nick's report. thanks for being with us. you say at this point it's clear you're dealing with a serial bomber. can you say what's led you to that conclusion? >> you know, i think the fact we've had these bombing incidents occurring in our community starting on march 2nd, continuing on march 12th, and then having another one last night, i don't see how we can't consider this a series. >> the change in the m.o. of this last one, it being a trip wire, is there -- i mean do you know what the significance of that is? do you think that's just -- if it is the same person, that that person just felt they could no longer kind of continue the way they were before and to change? is it a different kind of bomb? >> you know, we do believe that it's the same person based on the components that are com prizing the explosive devices across all four that we've had so far. so we do believe this is the same person or persons that are involved in these. and using the trip wire on this

one, the first three felt as if they were targeting a specific residence and possibly a specific person. the way this fourth device was placed in a neighborhood and left with a trip wire to really injure the person who randomly came across it was very different than the ones that felt targeted in the first three. >> sometimes in terms of terrorism bomb-makers have a certain signature people talk about. when you talk about similar components, is it more than just similar components? do you see the way the bombs themselves are put together, are they similar? >> you know, i know there are some similarities. the atf is taking all of the evidence from all four blast scenes now. the prior three scenes are already in the lab at quantico, and they're looking at the devices. they're comparing them, looking for similarities. what i do know is they've let us know the similarities they've

seen to this point lead them to believe as we do that these are all being constructed by the same person or person who's are responsible for this. >> do you have any suspects at this point? i know you're offering a reward for tips. are you getting a lot of tips? >> we've had a lot of tips come into the command center, and as each tip comes in, it gets assigned to either a team of fbi agents, atf agents or austin detectives to do follow-up work on. we will continue to follow up on any lead that's given to us. we're reaching out to the community, imploring them please come forward if you think you know something, no matter how inconsequential you think it may be. that may be the piece we need to link it together and solve this before we have someone else in our community that gets seriously injured or killed. >> you're clearly reaching out to this bomber to try to get in touch with you, to open up some lines of communication. >> yes. we are reaching out. we've been very vocal about that.

again, wanting to give the person or persons responsible for this an opportunity to come forward and to explain what their motivation may be, what it is that they are either upset about or angry about or whatever the reason is behind this, let us know because we've got to put a stop to the devastation this is causing in our community and the lives that we have already lost. >> what message do you have to residents in austin tonight who are obviously frightened? >> you know, i absolutely understand their concern, and what we've been explaining is it's important now to be vigilant. we have to pay attention to surroundings. know where you are. know if something looks out of place, and that's beyond just packages like we were talking about with the first three incidents. know if something looks out of place. really it's important too, know your neighbors. if you don't know your neighbors, get to know them. this is something we're going to have to work on together as a community because we need all the help from our citizens here giving us information, letting us know if someone, something looks out of place, to call us

and give us that tip because we all have to work together to really do our best to identify this person or persons as quickly as possible. but the real message now is be vigilant, know your surroundings, and just pay attention. >> chief, we wish you and all your officers the best. thank you very much. good luck. up next, our breaking news from washington. what president trump's lawyers and the mueller team discussed in a face to face meeting before the president's twitter tirade against the special prosecutor over the weekend. ♪ if your adventure keeps turning into unexpected bathroom trips

you may have overactive bladder, or oab. ohhhh... enough already! we need to see a doctor. ask your doctor about myrbetriq® (mirabegron). it treats oab symptoms of urgency, frequency, and leakage. it's the first and only oab treatment in its class. myrbetriq may cause serious allergic reactions. if you experience swelling of the face, lips, throat or tongue, or difficulty breathing... stop taking myrbetriq and tell your doctor right away. myrbetriq may increase blood pressure. tell your doctor right away if you have trouble emptying your bladder or have a weak urine stream. myrbetriq may affect or be affected by other medications. before taking myrbetriq, tell your doctor if you have liver or kidney problems. common side effects include increased blood pressure, common cold symptoms urinary tract infection, constipation, diarrhea, dizziness, and headache. need some help managing your oab symptoms along the way? ask your doctor if myrbetriq is right for you, and visit myrbetriq.com to learn more.

patrick woke up but he's got work to do. so he took aleve this morning. if he'd taken tylenol, he'd be stopping for more pills right now. only aleve has the strength to stop tough pain for up to 12 hours with just one pill. tylenol can't do that. aleve. all day strong. all day long. check this sunday's paper for extra savings on products from aleve. thisat red lobsterest. with exciting new dishes like dueling lobster tails and lobster truffle mac & cheese. classics like lobster lover's dream are here too. so enjoy these 10 lobsterlicious dishes while you can because lobsterfest won't last.

if you have moderate to severe plaque psoriasis, little things can be a big deal. that's why there's otezla. otezla is not an injection or a cream. it's a pill that treats psoriasis differently. with otezla, 75% clearer skin is achievable after just 4 months, ... with reduced redness, thickness, and scaliness of plaques. and the otezla prescribing information has no requirement for routine lab monitoring. don't use if you're allergic to otezla. otezla may cause severe diarrhea, nausea, or vomiting. tell your doctor if these occur. otezla is associated with an increased risk of depression. tell your doctor if you have a history of depression or suicidal thoughts, or if these feelings develop. some people taking otezla reported weight loss. your doctor should monitor your weight and may stop treatment.

other side effects include upper respiratory tract infection and headache. tell your doctor about all the medicines you take and if you're pregnant or planning to be. ♪ otezla. show more of you. welcome to the second hour of "360." after a presidential tweet storm of the russia probe and breaking news on the possible shape of presidential testimony in it, on the table tonight, the president's new claim of witch hunt, in all caps of course, his tweet storm targeting robert mueller and more. also tonight, the lawmakers who say firing mueller would be dangerous, dumb politically, suicidal, but are doing nothing to stop it. and later a new twist in the stormy daniels saga. we begin with the breaking news and cnn's pamela brown at the white house. what have you learned about this meeting between the president's legal team and mueller's team? >> reporter: well, anderson, we've learned that lawyers on both sides, on robert mueller's side as well as lawyers for the president, met just last week in a face-to-face interview. this is the first one they've had in recent weeks after informal discussions about a possible interview.