internet providers promise business owners a lot. let's see who delivers more. comcast business offers fast gig-speeds across our network. at&t doesn't. we offer more complete reliability with up to 8 hours of 4g wireless network backup. at&t, no way. we offer 35 voice features and solutions that grow with your business. at&t, not so much. we give you 75 mbps for $59.95. that's more speed than at&t's comparable bundle, for less. call today.

good evening. in a startling reversal from just 24 hours ago, the president of the united states got on the phone today and really spoke his mind about russia. he said what a terrible thing it was that russia likely with vladimir putin's say so poisoned a putin opponent and others with a highly toxic poison. he said russia needs to be held accountable and promised action to do it. the only problem was he wasn't speaking to vladimir putin on the phone. he was talking to the president of france. that's right. he really gave the president of france a piece of his mind today. yesterday this is what he said about his call with putin. >> i had a call with president putin and congratulated him on the victory, his electoral victory. >> he congratulated him, which according to "the washington post," as you probably know by know, his briefers in capital letters warned him not to do.

he failed to mention the whole poisoning on the soil of a nato ally thing, which the same briefers urged him to do according to "the washington post." there's no law that says the president has to take their advice. he is the president. he gets the final say. what he does not get, however, is a pass. keeping them honest, the president is a grown-up, making grown-up decisions perhaps about the fate of all of us, and those decisions deserve scrutiny. it would be insulting to treat him otherwise, especially when his decisions have other people raising serious questions. >> i think he's afraid of the president of the russia. >> why? >> i think one can speculate as to why, that the russians may have something on him personally, that they could always roll out and make his life more difficult. the russians i think have had long experience with mr. trump and may have things that they could expose. >> something personal perhaps? >> perhaps. perhaps. >> that's john brennan, former cia director. he's by and large an obama appointee who recently lashed out on twitter against the president about the firing of andrew mccabe. in a moment, we'll be joined by

former director of national intelligence james clapper, who also has questions. the president, who calls general clapper a hack by the way, is on the defensive, tweeting this afternoon, quote, i called president putin of russia to congratulate him on his election victory. in past obama called him also. the fake news media is crazed because they want me to excoriate him. they are wrong. getting along with russia and a good thing, not a bad thing. they can help solve problems with north korea, syria, isis, iran, and even the coming arms race. bush tried to get along but didn't have the smarts. obama and clinton tried but didn't have the energy or chemistry. remember reset. peace through strength. but remember back on the campaign trail? back then the president claimed that strength starts with naming your adversary. at least he said that when it was radical islam, and he was attacking president obama. >> to solve a problem, you have to be able to state what the problem is or at least say the name. we have a president that refuses to use the term. another event happens.

i keep saying, i wonder if he's going to say it this time, and he doesn't say it. he won't say it. he won't say it. he doesn't want to talk about it. he doesn't want to mention the term. he doesn't want to use the term. we have a leader that doesn't even want to discuss the name of the problem. and you can't solve a problem if you refuse to talk about what the problem is. anyone who will not name our enemy is not fit to lead our country. >> naming your enemy. but when it comes to putin, not so much. in fact, it does seem like this president has always gone out of his way even to say nice things about putin. >> i spoke indirectly and directly with president putin, who could not have been nicer. he is really very much of a leader. he said nice things about me. i have nothing to do with putin. i've never spoken to him. i don't know anything about him other than he will respect me. if he says great things about me, i'm going to say great things about him. it would be nice if we got along. if we don't, we don't.

he could not have been nicer. he was so nice. if putin likes donald trump, guess what, folks. that's calls an asset, not a liability. i hope we have a fantastic relationship. i don't love, i don't hate. we'll see how it works. we'll see. i like him because he called me a genius. putin did call me a genius, and he said i'm the future of the republican party so he's off to a good start. >> that's the president on vladimir putin, some of which he said after he became president, meaning after he was briefed on the extent of russian interference in the election, but perhaps his reluctance to speak ill of putin is just a function of his natural reticence, his reserve, a certain inability to speak ill of anyone. and, yes, i'm kidding. >> crooked hillary clinton. little marco. lion ted cruz. i don't know what i said. i don't remember. rosie o'donnell is disgusting both inside and out. you take a look at her, she's a slob. >> he's a war hero. >> he's a war hero because he

was captured. i like people that weren't captured, okay? rocket man should have been handled a long time ago. jb jeb bush is a low energy person. for him to get things done is hard. maxine waters, a very low iq individual. we have a representative in congress who they say was here a long time ago. they call her pocahontas. >> vladimir putin gets no nickname even though, as you know, those clips barely scratch the surface all the people president or candidate trump has slammed over the years nor all the disparaging twitter nicknames. there's some of them, just a partial list. nothing for putin, not bad vlad, or poisoning putin or botox boris. according to our friends on the lead with jake tapper, the president has written more about the musical "hamilton" than he hasn't putin. it's not like his top advisers aren't speaking out.

some of them are. >> the united states believes that russia is responsible for the attack on two people in the united kingdom using a military-grade nerve agent. >> russia has often employed malicious tactics against the u.s. and europe to drive us apart and serially harassing and intimidating diplomats are not the behaviors of a responsible nation. >> i'm surprised there were any russian cyber experts available based on how active most of them have been in undermining our democracies in the west. >> now those russia critics, secretary of state tillerson of course is gone a day after criticizing russia for the last time. the president of course is also said to be unhappy with h.r. mcmaster who you say there at the end. let's get more from cnn's pamela brown. so is the white house explaining the president is essentially playing nice with vladimir putin? why when he's so rough on so many other people? do they have an explanation? >>. >> reporter: well, the white house is saying, anderson, that it believes that having a good

relationship with russia is a good thing essentially and that the president believes that he can change the course with russia unlike his predecessors by this direct personal relationship with its leader, even if that leader is an adversary like vladimir putin. now, the white house argues, anderson, it has been tough on russia. closing the conflict in san francisco, arming rebels in the ukraine, imposing sanctions just recently. but the argument could be made that the administration has been tougher on russia than the president himself, who has been reluctant to directly confront vladimir putin as you pointed out despite several opportunities to do so, despite the fact that his intelligence community has said that it had meddled in the 2016 election, is doing so in the 2018 election, the poisoning of the ex-russian spy, and the uk just last week the administration came out and said russia had hacked the u.s. power grid. but despite this, you are not seeing the president coming out and directly confronting

vladimir putin. just yesterday, for example, with the phone call congratulating him, sarah sanders was asked after if he brought up the poisoning in the uk as his advisers had reportedly told him to do. he didn't bring that up, and he also didn't bring up russian election meddling. so it certainly raises questions why the president is reluctant to go after vladimir putin himself, anderson. >> has there been any fallout since the leak last night of the warning the president reportedly got in writing from government officials to not congratulate putin? >> reporter: well, there has here at the white house. i can tell you many white house aides, officials are rattled by this leak, and the president himself has been seething. only a select number of people, very few people would actually have been privy to that fox information in his briefing materials, advising the president to not congratulate in bold letters vladimir putin, which the president did anyway as we know. one white house official says leaking materials from -- leaking contents of the

president's briefing materials could be a fireable offense. and so now john kelly, the chief of staff, anderson, is saying that he's going to launch an investigation, particularly targeting those in the national security team who may be trying to undermine the president. for many here, anderson, this is reminiscent of the early days in this administration where you saw several leaks that were seen as trying to embarrass the president, such as you'll recall when the contents of the president's contentious conversation with the australian prime minister were leaked, anderson. >> pam brown from the white house, thanks. joining us now is former director of national intelligence, director clapper. this president has no problem criticizing foreign leaders, people at the fbi, the cia, elsewhere, the department of justice. the fact that he's taken this softer approach with putin, does it make sense to you? >> no, anderson, it doesn't. i think this has been a mystery

about why -- and i'm speaking of the president personally here -- which the singular, almost aggressive indifference to the threat that putin represents, who is bent on undermining this country and undermining our very political fabric. so, you know, john brennan, of course speculated about why that's so. that's potentially one reason. the russians have something on him. we don't know that for a fact. the term they use is kompromat, or if there's some financial entanglement that he doesn't want revealed. i don't know what it is. but what's required here, particularly with respect to this information warfare campaign that the russians are waging against us right now very aggressively is leadership, and that leadership can only come from the president. >> let me ask you about that because chris wray when he was testifying, he said, look, the fbi is taking a number of measures to try to prevent

interference from russia in the next election as are other agencies at the u.s. government. but the testimony has always been that the president himself has not directed specific actions. why is that so critical? if individual agencies are acting on their own, why does it matter if the president has never held a cabinet level meeting to oversee kind of a, you know, overall strategy from all the agencies? >> well, exactly. i mean as director wray testified, director of the nsa testified, and today -- or yesterday, i guess, whenever the secretary of homeland security testified, and they're all apparently working things in their own lane. what's needed, though, is an across the government approach and some leadership and direction and most importantly a sense of urgency across the entire government, and for that matter across society. i mean the president, you know,

his word carries huge weight. so if he is the leader in terms of educating the public about what the russians are doing, that carries a lot of weight. so good on each of the parts of the government that are doing things in their own lane. but what's required here is leadership and direction overall. >> well, i mean if one uses that benchmark, then, i mean he's educating or trying to lead the public to follow his beliefs about, you know, corruption at the highest levels of the fbi or problems with the department of justice or whatever it may be. he's tweeting very little about russian interference in the past election or concerns about it in the future. >> well, exactly. i mean there's a lot of distractions here, some of which are, i think, his own making. and as a consequence of that, we're losing sight of what is a fundamental threat to this country. and that's what's wrong with it. all these other distractions,

which are, you know, for various motivations, don't get to that. they don't -- they detract from what the focus should be, which is the threat posed by russia. >> what do you make of the white house house's focus apparently on the actual leak of this memo to "the washington post," the moment in which he was told by briefers, don't congratulate putin and do speak out about the poisoning on nato soil? a, i mean what's worse to you, the leak or the substance itself of the call? >> well, something that we have learned in the intelligence community the hard way, that one man's leaker is another man's whistle-blower. and i do think that a president, this one or any other, is entitled to confidentiality, particularly with respect to dialogue between him and his advisers. but apparently someone or some people in the white house felt

strongly about just what we were talking about, the president's reluctance to call out -- dime out the russians and putin specifically that they saw fit to expose it to the media. so it's regrettable, and even the -- you know, his congratulating putin in and of itself, in isolation, is not a particularly bad thing. i certainly don't agree with it. it's kind of ironic after his complaints about rigged elections during the campaign. but it's the context in light of everything's that's happened since he's become president and, again, his disregard for the threat posed by russia, which in that context and, you know, recent events in the uk, i thought made it particularly inappropriate. >> general clapper, i appreciate your time. thank you very much. coming up next, breaking news on what robert mueller wants to zero in on with the president. possible new reporting on his

prosecutorial playbook. harvard's alan dershowitz joins us for that. also what appears to be the texas bomber's cell phone confession. some of his last words before taking his own life. late details on "360." like dueling lobster tails and lobster truffle mac & cheese. classics like lobster lover's dream are here too. so enjoy these 10 lobsterlicious dishes while you can because lobsterfest won't last. ♪ ♪ the fastest samsung ever demands t-mobile, the fastest network ever.

because fast should be fast. ♪ right now get the new samsung galaxy s9 for half off. ♪ wemost familiar companies,'s but we make more than our name suggests. we're an organic tea company. a premium juice company. a coconut water company. we've got drinks for long days. for birthdays. for turning over new leaves. and we make them for every moment in every corner of the country. we are the coca-cola company, and we're proud to offer so much more. and made it liberating. we took safe... and made it daring. we took intelligent, and made it utterly irresistible. we took the most advanced e-class ever...

and made the most exciting e-class ever. the 2018 e-class coupe and sedan. lease the e300 sedan for $569 a month at your local mercedes-benz dealer. mercedes-benz. the best or nothing. ♪ "glorious" by (speaking in french) ♪ this is what our version of financial planning looks like. tomorrow is important, but this officially completes his education. spend your life living. find an advisor at northwesternmutual.com. ethat's the height ofs mount everest. because each day she chooses to take the stairs. at work, at home... even on the escalator. that can be hard on her lower body, so now she does it with dr. scholl's orthotics. clinically proven to relieve and prevent foot, knee or lower back pain,

by reducing the shock and stress that travel up her body with every step she takes. so keep on climbing, sarah. you're killing it. dr. scholl's. born to move. we know that when you're >> tspending time with thelass grandkids... ♪ music >> tech: ...every minute counts. and you don't have time for a cracked windshield. that's why at safelite, we'll show you exactly when we'll be there. with a replacement you can trust. all done sir. >> grandpa: looks great! >> tech: thanks for choosing safelite. >> grandpa: thank you! >> child: bye! >> tech: bye! saving you time... so you can keep saving the world. >> kids: ♪ safelite repair, safelite replace ♪ braking news in the russia probe, cnn has learned that special counsel mueller's team is talking with attorneys for the president about four specific areas of interest if and when they question him. according to two sources, those categories are the president's role in crafting a statement

aboard air force one that miscast the meeting at trump tower, also the circumstances surrounding the meeting as well as the firings of fbi director james comey and national security adviser michael flynn. there may be more as well. meantime, more presidential tweets. in additioning to defending his phone call with putin, the president enlisted some ivy league help in his defense. the president citing alan dershowitz, quote, special counsel is told to find crimes whether a crime exists or not. i was supposed to select of robert mueller. i think president was right when he said there never should have been a special counsel appointed because there was no probable cause for believing that there was any crime, collusion or otherwise obstruction of justice. we have professor dershowitz with us tonight. he's got a new book out, the case against bds, the case why singling out israel for boy krot is anti-semitic.

also jeffrey toobin. you say president trump is right to say special counsel should never have been appointed. could you say that because he is very publicly echoing your argument. >> well, he paraphrased what i said. i wrote it in an article on "the hill," and as long as ten months ago, i wrote an op-ed entitled special counsel is the wrong way to uncover the truth. i've always believed that. i think the issue is russia's involvement in the election, it's a systemic issue. we should have appointed a bipartisan, non-partisan commission like they do in england and israel to do an open investigation, which the public could see, about russia's involvement in elections and how to stop it. instead of doing that, we appointed a special counsel whose job was to find crimes, whether there were crimes or not, we still don't know. collusion is not a crime. obstruction of justice may not be a crime if the president engages in it as part of his constitutional authority. so i still take the position

that it was a mistake to appoint a special counsel, that an investigative commission would have been better. the fact that the president quotes me is noting? i control. >> do you want to see the president order rod rosenstein to fire mueller? >> no. i think it would be a terrible mistake to fire the special counsel. there's a big difference between making a mistake in appointing one and then firing one who is very much in the process of conducting a investigation. that would be a terterrible, terrible mistake and i think it would raise serious constitutional and other ethical questions. >> jeff, was it a mistake to have mult mueller in the first place? >> not only was it not a mistake, it was mandatory if we want to have a legal system that deserves any respect. let's think about what robert mueller has done. on january 24th, michael flynn lied to the fbi as he admitted. he pleaded guilty. could we have had jeff sessions prosecute michael flynn? they campaigned together for donald trump. that's why we needed a special counsel.

george papadopoulos, same thing. he worked for jeff sessions in the trump campaign. could jeff sessions have prosecuted him? of course not. alan, i don't know what is going on with you, but this is so obviously a conflict of interest, and this was the only way to resolve that. >> there's another way to resolve it. you have the justice department with a recused attorney general do a standard investigation. the deputy attorney general is not recused. he could have conducted the investigation. career people in the justice department could conduct the investigation. the big difference is when you appoint a special counsel, you put a target on the back of individuals. he had better find crimes, or else he's wasted the taxpayers' money. that's not true of the justice department. the justice department does an investigation and finds no crimes, that's a ho hum story. but if the special counsel does an investigation and doesn't find crimes, that's a big deal. that's why he has to go after the low-hanging fruit. he has to go after friends, associates. that's what happened with

clinton. they couldn't find anything with whitewater, so they went after him for an affair in the oval office and perjury during a deposition. that's the problem with special counsel. it's not a good thing. that's not me speaking. half the academic world has been opposed to the special counsel. half the judiciary has been opposed to special counsel. >> your position is there should never be a special counsel, ever, for any case? >> almost never. in fact, what i'd like to do is see the justice department have a special unit that is separate from the attorney general's office. most countries don't need special counsel because they have a director of public prosecution that is apolitical. we have a situation where the attorney general is both an adviser to the president and the chief prosecution officer. that's the only reason we need special counsel. we're the only democracy in the world that has special counsel, and it's a bad approach to justice. >> how does this come about that in every situation over the past year, you have been carrying water for donald trump? this is not who you used to be,

and you are doing this over and over again in situations that are just obviously rife with conflict of interest, and it's just -- like what's happened to new. >> what conflict of interest? i attacked president trump -- >> not you. i'm not talking about your conflict of interest -- >> i attacked president trump for his banning of muslims. i attacked president trump for leaking material about -- to russia. i've attacked president trump for many, many things. i'm not carrying his water. i'm saying exactly the same thing i said for 50 years. and, jeffrey, you ought to know that. you were my student. i have never deviated from this. i have never deviated from this point. the fact that it applies to trump now, rather than applying to bill clinton, is why people like you have turned against me. don't you understand that principle requires bipartisan and non-partisan, and that's who i am, and i've always been. >> but we have a system in place where, you know, you don't like grand juries.

you don't like special counsels. >> i don't. i'm a civil libertarians. civil libertarians criticize the law. >> but you are criticizing it in the context of position after position that is in support of exoneration of donald trump. >> it's not in support of -- look, i have no interest in whether donald trump is exonerated or not. if the evidence is against him, i will be the first person to call him out on it. i am asking for non-criminalization of political differences, narrow construction of the criminal law, civil liberties to apply equally to democrats and republicans. what you accuse me of is not being partisan. you want me to have a different standard against donald trump than i did in relation to the clintons and with everybody else. i said the same thing about bob menendez. i said the same thing about everybody who has been prosecuted. i'm saying the same thing about benjamin netanyahu in israel. i think there's criminalization and political differences there. i have been utterly and

completely consistent and non-partisan, and jeffrey, you haven't. >> professor dershowitz, let me ask you. you talked about having a sort of non-partisan permanent office in the department of justice, not going outside with the special prosecutor. but given all the attacks by this president on the department of justice, on the fbi, all the criticisms of a deep -- allegations of a deep state, if there's a permanent bureaucratic class within the department of justice which is doing these investigations, that seems like it's a ripe target for those who want to make accusations about a deep state. >> well, the president's wrong about that. i wish -- i have to tell you i wish john brennan, who is the former director of the fbi and who i have a lot of respect for, i wish he hadn't come out and suggested -- >> cia. >> cia. maybe they have something on president trump because if a media person does that, that's fine. but the former head of the cia who knows all the secrets and

has had access to all the wiretaps? when he says maybe it's possible they have something on him, he damn well better be right. >> professor dershowitz -- >> because if he's not right, he's creating an impression that because of what position he held, he really knows what he's talking about. now, i'm not in favor of all this conspiracy talk about the deep state. i want to see a system where everybody is treated exactly the same whether they're a democrat or a republican. i want to see a non-partisan approach -- >> and that's the system we have with independent counsel. >> we don't have that. >> or special counsels. look at -- you know, it's fine to talk about robert mueller in the abstract, you know, the risks of -- >> i like him as a person. i think he's a very good person. >> let me finish, alan. look at the record of what he's compiled. cases for making false statements. cases for conspiracy to defraud the united states. these are routine cases, routine statutes used by prosecutors.

>> exactly my point. >> that's right. and because he is applying -- >> any justice department -- >> let me finish, alan. >> any justice department official could have done that. you don't need a special counsel to go after low-hanging fruit like that. >> rod rosenstein, who you were suggesting could have supervised this, rod rosenstein was the person who said, i can't supervise this. i need to appoint an outsider. rod rosenstein, who is a professional prosecutor, career person, he understood that even though sessions was allegedly recused, although he seems awfully involved in these cases for someone who is recused, but he understood that for the integrity of the justice system, for the perception of fairness, there had to be a special counsel, an outsider, and that was right. >> i got to jump in and end this. i'm sorry. it's like a master class at harvard. you don't even need to pay tuition for harvard. you can just -- >> jeffrey still gets an a-plus. >> jeff toobin, professor

dershowitz, thank you very much. coming up, after the president was elects, the president decided he would make the white house staff sign nondisclosure agreements. the ndas were signed may not be enforceable. the latest on why and what the administration is saying about them. also ahead, we'll hear from the attorney representing karen mcdougal, the woman who said she had a ten-month affair with president trump. hey! it's me! your dry skin! i'm craving something we're missing. the ceramides in cerave. they help restore my natural barrier, so i can lock in moisture... and keep us protected. we've got to have each other's backs... and fronts. cerave. what your skin craves. ♪ ♪

they read more. e have one thing in common. how do they find the time? with audible. audible has the world's largest selection of audiobooks. books like peak performance... and endurance. books that energize and inspire for just $14.95 a month. less than you'd pay for the hardcover. with audible, you get a credit-a-month - good for any audiobook. if you don't like, exchange it at any time. no questions asked. you can also roll your credits to the next month if you don't use them. audible members use the free mobile app to listen anytime, anywhere. on the go or in the car.

the audible app automatically keeps your place. no bookmarks required. so you'll pick up right where you left off, even if you switch your phone to your echo at home. get more books in your life with audible. join audible now and get $50 off an annual membership and a free echo dot. just text echo deal to 500500 audible. listening is the new reading.

if you'd have told me three years ago... that we'd be downloading in seconds, what used to take... minutes. that guests would compliment our wifi. that we could video conference... and do it like that. (snaps) if you'd have told me that i could afford... a gig-speed. a gig-speed network. it's like 20 times faster than what most people have. i'd of said... i'd of said you're dreaming. dreaming! definitely dreaming. then again, dreaming is how i got this far. now more businesses in more places can afford to dream gig. comcast, building america's largest gig-speed network.

in a further sign that the president is trying to run the united states government, the same way he ran his business, we're learning that he made his white house staff sign nondisclosure adreemts. there is a catch. these ndas were drafted by white house counsel don mcgahn and were described to cnn as watered down, unenforceable agreements. 9 president was told early on it wasn't a workable idea for federal government employees but he wouldn't let it go. his leaks started coming fast and furious as soon as he took office. when the story first broke a few days ago, the white house called it, quote, completely false. today "the new york times" published a more detailed account of the nondisclosure d

>> so far the white house is not willing to acknowledge that these things exist. i asked to review a copy and they wouldn't provide one. >> there are oversight statutes and disclosure laws that all federal government employees are subject to. so those caveats are all in this nondisclosure agreement. as you said, don mcgahn, the white house counsel, explained to the president that it wasn't like the real estate world. it wasn't like the entertainment world where you can bind someone by one of these agreements and hold them to a very steep financial penalty if they violate it in the government. it's not that simple. but the president was determined

to impose something on his staff that he thought might deter them from either submitting to interviews or writing tell-all books that would be embarrassing to him. so this is what they came up with. >> do you know more about the details of the documents? were there financial penalties associated? can somebody, you know, if kellyanne conway leaves, can she write a book if she's one of the people that signed this thing? >> from everything i've heard from the people who signed it and saw it, there were no actual penalties specified within the document itself. again, it was very basic, sort of general document, and there are no penalties specified. we already know that the former has given lots and lots of bus,- interviews to a person who is writing a book about chiefs of staff, detailing in specific terms his first six months and donald trump's first six months in the white house. as far as i know, he's not facing any charges. it seems like don mcgahn was right, that it's not enforceable and they're not intending to enforce it. but it does exist, and they had

people sign it. >> ambassador eisen, is this even legal? is there a compelling government purpose? it sounds like maybe these were more just to make the president feel better. >> well, anderson, they're not legal. unlike when mr. trump was occupying trump tower, in the oval office, the united states constitution applies to agreements that he compels his employees to sign. under the first amendment, there's an exception for classified information, attorney-client privileged information. but beyond that, the first amendment protects white house employees' ability to speak when they leave the white house. so it is a first amendment problem, and i think it's a problem that they wouldn't give julie and "the new york times" a copy of the thing. if it's so benign and unenforceable, why won't they share a copy so we can all see whether it's enforceable or not?

it doesn't sound enforceable to me. >> i wonder what this says about how the president views his presidency and how his staff deals with him and how he views his staff. >> it's interesting because i think it's one of the reminders that we have that this president really views his role in the white house has not that different from being an executive in private business. this is about his personal reputation. this is about him wanting to impose secrecy and use pressure to bind his employees to basically protect him and his reputation. and so he felt that it was very important to give people a disincentive essentially to make him look bad. and that's not a way that most presidents view their role. it's not a way that most white houses operate. but clearly it is the way that this president views it. and it's also another example of the ways in which the white house staff really tries to manage the president and sort of present to him the ways in which his job is actually different

than that of a corporate executive and gets pushed, you know, in various ways by mr. trump to do things that really aren't in the tradition of the white house and have very little to do with the conventions of the presidency. >> ambassador eisen, all of it does sort of -- it's sort of part and parcel of a larger reality the president seems to have struggled with, which is the federal government does not operate like a private business. >> well, anderson, his apparent contempt for the first amendment here is of a piece with the larger pattern that you point out. starting with the first unconstitutional muslim ban. his engagement with former fbi director james comey that, for heaven's sake, has landed him under investigation for obstruction of justice. a long pattern of official action that's been enjoined by the court. his private business was the same, anderson. he pushed the law. but when you're the chief law enforcement officer, you're going to get in a lot of trouble if you do that. and his staff is not tough enough on him.

when i was in the white house, if president obama told me this is a spurious agreement. it constricts the first amendment. now, go get people to sign it. i would have told him respectfully, sir, sign it yourself. i'm out of here. these staff are enablers, and there's some point at which they have to leave. and above all, the white house counsel, don mcgahn, his fingerprints are on every scandal in this white house, and is not doing any good for his client or for the united states. >> norm eisen, appreciate your being here. coming up in the next hour of 360, an exclusive interview with facebook ceo mark zuckerberg. what he has to say about reports that a data firm used by the trump campaign accessed information from about 50 million facebook users allegedly without their knowledge. but first breaking news in the texas serial bomber case. the suspect dead, but police say he left behind a 25-minute recorded confession. details of that in a moment. g.

your top-rated thing. that five stars, two thumbs up, 12-out-of-10, would recommend thing. because if you only want the best thing, you get the #1 thing. directv is rated #1 in customer satisfaction over cable. switch now and get a $200 reward card. more for your thing. that's our thing. call 1.800.directv broccabbage! beans! get your vegetables without a side of gas. the activated charcoal in charcocaps adsorbs gas for fast gas relief, without passing the gas. charcocaps. put less boom in the room.

had a little incident witht kia moped in bermuda.e. oh. even with insurance, we had to dip into our 401(k) and it set us back a little bit. sometimes you don't have a choice. but it doesn't mean you guys can't get back on track. great. great. yeah. no judgment. just guidance. td ameritrade. you made moonshine in a backwoods still. smuggled booze and dodged the law. even when they brought you in, they could never hold you down. when i built my family tree and found you, i found my sense of adventure. i set off on a new life, a million miles away.

i'm heidi choiniere, and this is my ancestry story. now with over 10 billion historical records, discover your story. get started for free at ancestry.com

there's breaking news from austin, texas. police say they have discovered a 25-minute confession recorded on a cell phone by the serial bomber where he describes the bombs that he constructed. authorities say the 23-year-old mark anthony conditt killed himself by exploding one of his bombs as police closed in on him. we are using his name and photos only because police are asking if you knew this young man, to please call them and share what you know. as you know, we wouldn't

normally do that. investigators say he was responsible for five homemade pipe bombs that exploded in and around austin the last three weeks, killing two people, injuring four others. law enforcement says a key break in the case was this surveillance video of a bomber at a fedex location days ago wearing a hat, a blonde wig and gloves and mailing two packages. early this morning, police surrounded the suspect. randi kaye has details. >> reporter: before dawn in round rock, texas, about 20 miles outside austin, authorities are closing in. this is where the string of bombings began, and soon this is where it will end. investigators are working on a tip they received about a person who by now had officially become a suspect. >> we ultimately located the vehicle that this suspect was known to be driving. we found that at a hotel right up the road here in round rock. >> reporter: law enforcement surrounds the hotel while they wait for backup from ballistics

and tactical units. they don't contact the suspect, but suddenly around 4:00 a.m., he drives away, though it's unclear if he had noticed he was being watched. police follow him. his car goes into a ditch. >> the vehicle ended up stopping in the bard ditch on the side of the road behind us. >> reporter: at about 4:45 a.m., a showdown is under way. >> as members of the austin police department s.w.a.t. team approached the vehicle, the suspect detonated a bomb inside the vehicle. >> reporter: a bomb inside his own vehicle taking his life. during the confrontation with the suspect, a s.w.a.t. officer was knocked back from the blast, and another fired on the suspect. by 6:00 a.m., the official announcement, the suspect is dead. authorities later identify the suspect as mark anthony conditt, a 23-year-old white male from pflugerville, texas, just outside austin. they believe he's responsible for all the bombings in the area

since march 2nd. still, whatever motivated the suspect to terrorize his community is still a mystery. >> that's the one thing we don't have right now is a motive behind this. >> reporter: police are trying to figure out if he was working alone, interviewing his family and roommates. the suspect was home schooled and briefly attended austin community college but did not graduate. his grandmother described him to cnn as very quiet, low key, and peaceful. on his record, a single traffic violation, nothing that ever would have indicated something as terrifying as this. >> so, randi, i understand the bomber had an online blog. what do we know about that? >> we got access to that blog from austin community college. he attended that college until 2012, and the blog is on a range of topics. he blogs against the idea of free abortion, suggesting women shouldn't have sex if they don't want to have a baby. in another blog post he suggests doing away with the sex offender registration, arguing that all

it does is cause people to shun that person and keep them from getting a job. and in another blog, he actually argued against same-sex marriage saying if that's protected by law, then bestiality and pedophilia should be protected as well, anderson. >> randi, thanks very much. up next, of the three current legal cases involving the president and women, one involves a former playboy model, an alleged ten-month affair, and an accusation that a tabloid bought her story just to bury it in order to protect the president. tomorrow on the program, i'll speak with karen mcdougal. up next, we'll hear from her attorney about what's at stake. ♪ the fastest samsung ever demands t-mobile, the fastest network ever. because fast should be fast. ♪ right now get the new samsung galaxy s9 for half off. ♪

claritin and relief from of non-drowsy symptoms caused by over 200 allergens. like those from buddy. because stuffed animals are clearly no substitute for real ones. feel the clarity and live claritin clear.

when it comes to travel, i sweat the details. late checkout... ...down-alternative pillows... ...and of course, price. tripadvisor helps you book a... ...hotel without breaking a sweat. because we now instantly... ...search over 200 booking sites ...to find you the lowest price... ...on the hotel you want. don't sweat your booking. tripadvisor. the latest reviews. the lowest prices. not necessarily after 3 toddlers with boundless energy. but lower back pain won't stop him from keeping up. because at a dr. scholl's kiosk he got a recommendation for our best custom fit orthotic to relieve his foot, knee, or lower back pain, from being on his feet. by reducing shock and stress on his body with every step. so look out world, dad's taking charge. dr. scholl's. born to move.

we have one to two fires a day and when you respond together and you put your lives on the line, you do have to surround yourself with experts. and for us the expert in gas and electric is pg&e. we run about 2,500/2,800 fire calls a year and on almost every one of those calls pg&e is responding to that call as well. and so when we show up to a fire and pg&e shows up with us it makes a tremendous team during a moment of crisis. i rely on them, the firefighters in this department rely on them, and so we have to practice safety everyday. utilizing pg&e's talent and expertise in that area trains our firefighters on the gas or electric aspect of a fire and when we have an emergency situation

we are going to be much more skilled and prepared to mitigate that emergency for all concerned. the things we do every single day that puts ourselves in harm's way, and to have a partner that is so skilled at what they do is indispensable, and i couldn't ask for a better partner. tomorrow night on the program, i'm going to be speaking in an exclusive interview with one of the women who says she and donald trump had an affair. former playboy model karen mcdougal is suing the company that owns the "national enquirer" which bought the rights to her story just so it could kill it apparently to protect the president according to the lawsuit. the publisher of the enquirer's parent company is a longtime friend of president trump. peter stris is karen mcdougal's attorney and i spoke to him before air time tonight. can you explain the deal that karen mcdougal signed with ami, which is the parent company of the "national enquirer"?

it's not a hush agreement like some others have signed. >> no, it's not a hush agreement. so it's a good question because, you know, what is the deal or what are people saying the deal is? so the deal was amended right after the election to allow karen to respond to any legitimate media requests. >> right. >> so in that respect, it's not a hush agreement at all. >> right. >> before that, the deal was a modeling and writing contract where she would write columns. she would be on two covers, and she would be paid. and she would sell the limited rights to her story. >> to her life story? >> yeah. >> so essentially ami was buying the rights to her life story, so she couldn't tell her life story or sell her life story to anybody else, and they would also give her a number of columns, and she could appear on the cover of the magazine a couple of times? >> that's right. but the way it unfolded is

extraordinary because it shows how this was a coordinated effort to catch and kill negative stories about the president. >> this term catch and kill, which a lot of people maybe don't know about, the allegation is that ami, one of their magazines is the "national enquirer," that the man who owns it is friends with the president. and they would buy the rights to people's stories that were going to say something unflattering about the president, perhaps, they would buy the rights but never write the story, never publish the story. that's where the term catch and kill comes from. >> that's right. let me tell you how this unfolded. karen hired a lawyer in 2016 because her story was starting to leak. the lawyer was supposed to be representing her. now, it turns out that he has a relationship with michael cohen, donald trump's fixer, where he negotiates hush deals. he was stormy daniels' lawyer for -- >> this is keith davidson. >> that's right. karen had no idea about this. >> she didn't know that he was representing stormy daniels and others? >> didn't know he was representing stormy daniels,

didn't know that there was the idea that he was coordinating with someone associated with trump. no clue. he also has a relationship with ami, and so when she retained him and thought he was representing her, he took her to abc, and that was not to be paid. in other words, she was going to go and do a legitimate journalistic piece where she would tell her story. >> mm-hmm. >> he also took her to ami. he told her that ami was going to pay her millions of dollars for this story. they sat down. she said everything that, you know, she had to say, and they said her story was worthless. when she got close to actually going on with abc, all of a sudden, ami resurfaced. >> ami has put out a statement, and i want to read what they said. they said, karen has been free, has spoken freely and remains free to speak regarding her story since the amendment made to her contract in 2016. the only thing she's limited from doing under her contract with american media is selling her story rights to another publisher or media outlet.

that is not silencing karen. so they're saying, yes, her contract was amended to allow her to respond to legitimate media inquiries through another attorney in 2016, and since then she's been able to speak. it's just they own the -- they still own the rights to her life story. >> and it sounds terrific. it's just not how they've behaved in private. ronan farrow did a story about ami catching and killing that prominently featured karen, and she was terrified. she didn't sit down for an interview. she just answered some questions. she verified some things. and in the wake of that, they made clear -- they said further disclosures would breach her contract and cause considerable monetary damages. i mean there's no mistaking it. we have plenty of evidence to back up the fact that there was a year of intimidation, not physical intimidation, but giving karen the impression that if she did what the contract, we

believe, says she could do, that there would be economic or reputational consequences. >> you say you want her just out of this contract because they're saying she's free to talk now, but you're saying, that's what they're saying publicly. we're afraid two years from now when there's not attention on this, they're going to say something different. >> that's exactly right. and karen's willing to put her money where her mouth is. she will give the money back if that's the issue. if they're worried that at some point someone's going to do a story and there's going to be money, she will assign it to a nonprofit. she does not want ami to profit from or control her through this contract. it's an illegal contract. it was obtained through fraud. it should be unwound. and if anyone's worried about her motives, we will address that. we will make it perfectly clear that her motive is to be free from this company. >> appreciate talking to you. thank you. >> thank you. >> out of fairness, we've asked for an on-camera interview from ami's ceo, david pecker. we have not gotten a response yet. cnn also obtained a statement

from karen mcdougal's former attorney, keith davidson, which said he can't discuss the matter during to attorney-client privilege but he doesn't believe the assertions in the complaint are a fair and accurate description of the situation. you can tune in tomorrow to 360 for my exclusive interview with karen mcdougal. that's tomorrow at 8:00 p.m. eastern right here. just ahead, a cnn exclusive. mark zuckerberg speaking out in the middle of the storm of questions about the role facebook played in the election and how it deals with users' data and privacy. the ceo tells his side of the story next. om trips you may have overactive bladder, or oab. ohhhh... enough already! we need to see a doctor. ask your doctor about myrbetriq® (mirabegron). it treats oab symptoms of urgency, frequency, and leakage. it's the first and only oab treatment in its class. myrbetriq may cause serious allergic reactions. if you experience swelling of the face, lips, throat or tongue,

or difficulty breathing... stop taking myrbetriq and tell your doctor right away. myrbetriq may increase blood pressure. tell your doctor right away if you have trouble emptying your bladder or have a weak urine stream. myrbetriq may affect or be affected by other medications. before taking myrbetriq, tell your doctor if you have liver or kidney problems. common side effects include increased blood pressure, common cold symptoms urinary tract infection, constipation, diarrhea, dizziness, and headache. need some help managing your oab symptoms along the way? ask your doctor if myrbetriq is right for you, and visit myrbetriq.com to learn more. broccabbage! beans! get your vegetables without a side of gas. the activated charcoal in charcocaps adsorbs gas for fast gas relief, without passing the gas. charcocaps. put less boom in the room.

gas, bloating, constipation and diarrhea can start in the colon and may be signs of an imbalance of good bacteria. only phillips' colon health has this unique combination of probiotics. it helps replenish good bacteria. get four-in-one symptom defense.