tv Erin Burnett Out Front CNN June 18, 2018 4:00pm-5:00pm PDT
4:00 pm
please be sure to tune in later tonight, cuomo primetime. it airs at 9:00 p.m. eastern, right here on cnn. among chris's guests, the white house counsellor, kellyanne conway. thank you very much for watching. "erin burnett outfront" starts right now. ♪ "outfront" next, breaking news, homeland security secretary under fire, questioned about the controversial immigration policy that's led to the separation of thousands of children from their parents. kirstin nielsen on the stand today. and another meeting between team trump and a russian. the man who set it up, michael caputo is "outfront." and republicans could move to hold rod rosenstein in contempt in days. let's go "outfront." good evening, i'm erin burnett. "outfront" tonight, the breaking news, the white house tonight struggling to contain growing outrage over separating families at the u.s./mexico border.
4:01 pm
after repeatedly delaying the white house press briefing, first one hour, then it was two, then another. and then it was four hours after the scheduled briefing time, until it started. the homeland security secretary krif kirstjen nielsen started the session. she was hit with the basics, questions about the well-being of children in detention centers, questions about what's happening inside those detention centers. questions she should have been able to answer. >> have you heard the audio clip of these children wailing, that just came out today? >> i have not seen something that came out today. >> why is the government only releasing images of the boys who are being held? w where are the girls? where are the young toddlers? >> i don't know. i'm not familiar with those particular images. >> do you know where the girls are? where the toddlers are? >> we have children in dhs care, both. but as you know, most of the
4:02 pm
children after 72 hours, are transferred to hhs. so i don't know what pictures you're referencing, but i'd refer you to hhs. >> we've seen the boys, but not the girls, any of the young toddlers. and you're saying they're being well cared for, so how can you make that claim if you don't know where they are? >> it's not that i don't know where they are. the vast majority of children are held by health and human services. we transfer them after 72 hours. i don't know what pictures you're speaking about. >> they've been aired all over national television. >> by? okay, let's find out from hhs. >> you know, kind of a basic thing, where are all the girls and the toddlers? and what about if they're siblings with the little boys? the reality of it is, dhs is implementing the trump administration's zero tolerance policy that has led to the separation of thousands of children from their parents. the separation of families is something even some republicans are calling immoral, cruel, and
4:03 pm
traumatizing. our zjeff zeleny asked straight up, is this child abuse? >> how could this not be child abuse, for the people who are taken from their parents? not the ones who are sent here with their parents' blessing with the smugglers, the people who are taken from their parents? >> unfortunately, i'm not in any position to deal with, you know, hearsay stories. if someone has a specific allegation, as i always do when i testify, i ask that they provide that information to the department of homeland security. we will look into it. of course we do not want any situation where a child is not completely adequately taken care of. >> again, not in any position to deal with hearsay. even if she couldn't answer some of the simple questions that the trump administration knew would come at this briefing, could nielsen admit that the president could be using this issue as leverage in his immigration fight? >> madam secretary, can you definitively say, are athe children being used as pawns for a border wall? >> the children are not being
4:04 pm
used as a pawn. we're trying to fre protect the. >> the truth in terms of congress, it doesn't need to act for the government to stop splitting up families. attorney general jeff sessions announced this zero tolerance policy back in april, and the president at any moment could order sessions to stop. caitlyn collins is "outfront." caitlyn, this briefing, there was high drama, delay, delay, delay, delay. hours went by. kirstjen nielsen finally to the podium. how is this briefing playing inside the white house? >> reporter: well, it doesn't seem to be playing out well. kirstjen nielsen was brought out to the briefing room to answer questions to this and quiet a lot of the criticism that the trump administration has faced in recent days, as these images have flashed across television screens and been printed on the front page of newspapers. that's precisely why the press secretary, sarah sanders, said she wanted nielsen out there on
4:05 pm
this, because she's the expert. if you were a reporter in the room, she didn't do a lot to quiet that criticism or answer any questions. in fact, she contradicted some things that past administration officials have said, including that she didn't believe this was a policy meant to deter people from crossing illegally, even though that's what her mentor john kelly, the person who convinced the president to give kirstjen nielsen this job, replacing him after he became chief of staff, said just last march on cnn that it was his thinking that it would deter people from crossing the border illegally. she couldn't answer basic questions about where the young girls are in these detention facilities. she said she visited them but she couldn't explain that. she always refused to acknowledge it as a policy of the trump administration, mvp going every other way around it to avoid saying it was a policy, even though it clearly is what their policy is. and we saw the attorney general jeff sessions say as much when he unveiled it just last month.
4:06 pm
so several things there. she also was blaming congress repeatedly. we've seen that from the administration several times in recent days, a lot of blame for democrats here even though republicans in congress haven't gone that far. basically the bottom line here, erin, she left a lot of people questioning what exactly it was that she accomplished by coming out and speaking with reporters almost in an upbeat mood today, i should note, when she really didn't answer that many questions. >> no, she didn't. all right, thank you very much, caitlyn. i want to go now to the national affairs correspondent for the nation, co-founder and chair of the pro trump pac and april ryan. you were in the room, asking a question about the children and whether they were being used as pawns, your word. what was the vibe in that briefing room, after waiting for, what, four hours? secretary nielsen comes to the podium and everyone saw a little bit about how she answered questions. >> yeah, typically when we are
4:07 pm
waiting for hours and they push it back, well, they push it back quite a bit. but when you start at 1:15, then you go to 3:30, then it's pushed back even further to 5:00 p.m., they're trying to make moves to fix something or they're bringing someone out. that's indeed what happened. this is a very hot topic. the mood in this room was very different. it was off. prior to the briefing, we were watching the very riveting audio. watching and listening to that audio with the children crying at the border and being separated from their family. and then later on, during the time where the secretary of homeland security was answering questions in the q & a, a reporter who has identified herself on twitter, olivia newsy decided she was going to play the audio so that the secretary would hear it. and i could hear it in the third row. she was way in the back of the room. and once i went back in my
4:08 pm
office here at the white house to do my job, to do my reports, i could clearly hear it on the audio. so my question is, did the secretary -- did madam secretary, and did the white house press secretary hear it? it was loud enough. and the mood in the room -- >> you could hear it in the background listening to the conference. >> yeah, so the mood in the room, we wanted answers. because when you have a president whose base is upset, who the religious right, when you have franklin grim, you have a lot of people, who are in his camp, and even his own wife who is not happy about this, and all the living first ladies, this is a big issue. and when you deal with children, the nation rises up even if they are not children of america. these are children nonetheless, no matter where they come from. >> and children as we all know are children no matter where they come from. i'll play the audio in just a moment, but let me go to you. the president of the american
4:09 pm
academy of pediatrics said this morning, the practice of separating families and specifically young parents from their children is child abuse. jeff zeleny asked about it. let me play kirstjen nielsen's response again. >> how is this not specifically child abuse for these innocent children who are indeed being separated from their parents? >> so, i want to be clear on a couple other things. the vast majority -- vast, vast majority of children who are in the care of hhs right now, 10,000 of the 12,000, were sent here alone by their parents. that's when they were separated. we now care for them. we have high standards. we give them meals, we give them education. we give them medical care. there's videos, there's tvs. i've visited the detention centers myself. that would be my answer to that question. >> she denies it's child abuse. >> it's child abuse. >> if you take her numbers and say whatever you want to say about the 10,000 whose parents
4:10 pm
sent them here, even by her math, that leaves 2,000 children -- >> we know there were 2,000 children that the trump administration separated from their parents. it's child abuse. we're both moms. there's a long literalure about early separation between parent and child, what it does to the child long-term. even if it's brief, it's scary. especially if it's extended. i could not believe that she sat there and denied it. she knows nothing about conditions. everything that she was asked specifically about conditions in these facilities, she couldn't tell us a thing. so how can she say they're well cared for. we're hearing stories that children are not -- they can't be hugged by these professionals, because it's kind of a jail atmosphere, not a daycare atmosphere. they literally can't be hugged or picked up when they're crying for their mom. there's a story that a young teenager had to change the diaper of a toddler because the people in charge didn't feel like they were authorized to change diapers. they don't have the right people in place. they are not doing the right
4:11 pm
thing. they don't have the right facilities. this is child abuse. and it's being done in our name and it's got to stop. >> amy? >> well, i think it's horrific that we're having to go through this, erin. i mean, as a mom, i feel for these kids. my gosh, when i left atlantic last night, i cried leaving my dog. so america is compassionate. we do care, but the fact of the matter is, this is congress's responsibility. i don't care if you say it's republicans or democrats. fix the damn problem and fix it now. that's what we need to do. >> you got a point in that congress needs to change the law. i get that. but in the meantime, the president has complete, 100% jurisdiction on whether he goes go ahead and does this. >> this is not a law, it's a policy. [ all speak at once ] >> and this is up to their discretion. >> why is he doing that? >> erin, he tried to fix this problem back in the spring,
4:12 pm
earlier this year, when we went to the democrats. the democrats don't want to fix this problem. they want this to be their issue going into the mid terms because higher taxes and less jobs is not a winning proposition for them. they don't want to fix the problem opini problem. that's the real issue here. >> this is a bipartisan bill. [ all speak at once ] >> erin? >> they refuse -- the trump administration refused to sign it. they made clear they wouldn't sign it. >> are both sides using the children as pawns? >> let me say this. this president and the head of homeland security could easily reverse this. >> tonight. >> and they could easily do it right now. but at the issue, sarah huckabee said, when i asked the head of homeland security definitively, is this about children being used as pawns for a wall? she said no, but sarah huckabee sanders came back when another reporter asked, can you just do it on this piece if you work with congress? she said it's all or nothing. so they want the wall included. >> do you have a problem with
4:13 pm
the wall, april? >> excuse me! >> why do you have a problem with it? >> i am a reporter, i could care less about a wall. [ all speak at once ] >> don't put this on me. this is your president. why don't you talk about the people back there? >> secure our borders. >> don't accuse me, i'm a reporter, i'm asking questions. okay, let's get that straight. it's not about politics. but the bottom line is, when you have children crying and you're hearing reports that these kids are being -- you don't know who's changing diapers, there's something wrong. i'm not weighing in one side or the other, i'm saying there's something wrong and this president can fix it. he can easily fix it. >> they're using children as hostages to get their wall. >> that is not true, joan. >> it's absolutely true. >> this president ran on securing the border. >> they're calling it a bargaining chip. [ all speak at once ] >> what does securing the border have to do with separating toddlers from their mothers? why put those in the same sentence? >> why were you not concerned
4:14 pm
about this when the obama administration did this? >> the obama administration did not do this. >> yes, they did. >> well, give us the paper. don't say it blindly. give us the facts. show me. prove it. >> the press came out and was running pictures of what happened in 2014. when they were called out on it, they back pedalled. now here we are. >>. [ all speak at once ] >> this is a issue about humanity, not politics. emily this is about humanity, not politics. >> you're right it is about humanity. we're also a nation of laws and secure the damn border. >> you have franklin graham, whom the president loves -- >> the border is not secure. >> -- who said this is about family and talkin religion. you talk about you have children and dogs. >> i have a question for you. we all have children, right? and i want to know, would any of you send your -- any one of your
4:15 pm
children thousands of miles away without you, not knowing what's going to happen? >> no, i would not, but -- [ all speak at once ] >> we're talking about toddlers that come with their parents. >> that's a totally different category. >> erin, let me say something. >> no, let me respond to you. since you brought me into this. since you brought me into this, no, i would not do that to my child. i'm with my children as much as i can be. but guess what, we don't have the circumstances that some of these people have. i am not living, trying to duck and run. so you don't know what people are going through, until you walk in someone else's shoes, don't say what you would do. >> i agree with you, but let me say something. if people are truly seeking asylum, then you go to a port of entry entryaoao. >> you don't know what these people are doing. >> 114% of -- >> you cannot assume. you cannot assume. >> i'm not assuming anything. [ all speak at once ] >> you said, they had to walk across the border. >> joan? >> they're being brought in by
4:16 pm
cartels and coyotes. that's who are bringing them in. 10,000 of the 12,000 that are being detained right now have been brought in, they're not with their parents. >> we're not talking about them. >> we need to secure the border, fix the problem. >> to this point, amy, we're talking about the 2,000 children who come with their parents and are then taken away from their parents. that's the group we're talking about. you keep mentioning the other children. we're talking specifically about that group. >> i challenge you to listen to this audio that came out today, amy. you listen to it. >> i heard it. >> these are not smugglers, they're not coyotes. and secretary nielsen did something kind of evil tonight by introducing that new line of reasoning that, oh, these are smugglers, these are traffickers. no, you hear people calling for mommy, mommy, and daddy, daddy, these are not traffickers. this is a new lie. every night there's a new lie. >> it's not a lie. >> every night there's a new lie. >> it's not a lie. this is what the democrats want to run on, because they can't
4:17 pm
run on -- >> oh, my god. >> -- higher taxes and less jobs. >> admit it, 2,000 of these children have been pulled from their parents. if you're saying it's a lie, you're saying she's lying also. >> let's close the loophole, erin. >> what loophole? >> what about the emergent issue now? what about the emergency of now? >> right. congress needs to fix it. they can fix it tonight. >> fix this, but you want everything, you want a wall, you want everything. but what about the emergent issue? >> only donald trump can fix it tonight, he can end this policy. it's not a law. he can do it himself. >> you want them taken care of, amy, if you get a wall, that's what you're saying? >> i want both of them. it doesn't have to be one or the other, erin. >> but they can remain -- [ all speak at once ] >> you're saying, don't do anything unless you get the wall? >> they can remain in a bad situation and hurt until you get a wall, that could be years, months, but the hurt will continue, is that what you're saying?
4:18 pm
>> no, that's not what i'm saying. don't try to put words in my mouth. >> that's what you just said. you said it. >> we could have fixed it a long time ago. >> i also want to play that shocking audio as we get ready to talk to jeff merkel at the front of this. this is the audio from inside a facility where some of these children have been separated from their parents. listen in. [ crying ] [ speaking foreign language ] >> senator jeff markly has been inside the detention centers, he's going to talk about that. plus, two trump confidants suddenly remembering a meeting with a russian who promised dirt on hillary clinton. how could they have forgotten? one of them is going to come "outfront" and tell his side of the story. also breaking, the fight escalating between republicans
4:19 pm
4:20 pm
roasted to perfection. or new caribbean lobster and shrimp. but hurry in. lobster & shrimp summerfest won't last. and we're committed to improving every ride.t to you starting with features designed to make it easy for your driver to find you. taking the stress out of pickups. and we're putting safety at the heart of everything we do. with a single tap, we're giving you new ways to let loved ones know you're on your way. uber has new leadership, a new vision and is moving in a new direction... forward. how could they have forgotten?
4:21 pm
there are multiples on the table: one is cash, three are fha, one is va. so what can you do? she's saying a whole lotta people want to buy this house. but you got this! rocket mortgage by quicken loans makes the complex simple. understand the details and get approved in as few as eight minutes. by america's largest mortgage lender. i thought i was managing my moderate to severe crohn's disease. then i realized something was missing... me. my symptoms were keeping me from being there. so, i talked to my doctor and learned humira is for people who still have symptoms of crohn's disease after trying other medications. and the majority of people on humira saw significant symptom relief and many achieved remission in as little as 4 weeks. humira can lower your ability to fight infections, including tuberculosis. serious, sometimes fatal infections and cancers, including lymphoma, have happened; as have blood, liver, and nervous system problems, serious allergic reactions, and new or worsening heart failure.
4:22 pm
before treatment, get tested for tb. tell your doctor if you've been to areas where certain fungal infections are common, and if you've had tb, hepatitis b, are prone to infections, or have flu-like symptoms or sores. don't start humira if you have an infection. be there for you, and them. ask your gastroenterologist about humira. with humira, remission is possible. proven to protect street skaters and freestylers. stops up to 97% uv. lasts through heat. through sweat. coppertone. proven to protect. merkley. breaking news, the audio obtained by propublica from inside a u.s. border facility, you will hear it in full. children crying for their parents. one 6-year-old girl pleading for someone to call her aunt. listen. [ speaking foreign language ]
4:23 pm
4:24 pm
jeff merkley, who's been speaking out. he's been down to the border and seen the detention facility first hand. senator, you saw obviously what was happening in one detention center and now this audio is getting a lot of attention tonight. the homeland security secretary was asked about it today, it was played in the background of the entire briefing. does what we just heard reflect what you witnessed and saw? >> well, what i saw at the processing center were children who had been assembled into a 30 by 30 chain link fence space who had been, many of whom had been separated from their parents within the previous hours or previous day. they weren't sobbing while i was there. i did ask about these painful separations. they said it happens, some, yes, there. a lot of separations occur before people get there. i mean, the kids don't know what's going on. they don't know where they're headed. they don't know how long they're going to be separated.
4:25 pm
they don't know when they'll see their parents again. and their parents don't know what's going on either. everybody who works with these kids is bringing forward how -- what type of irreparable harm is done in these separations. it just rips your heart apart. >> the chief of the american association of pediatrics said it was akin to child abuse. reporters asked kirstjen nielsen, the homeland security secretary about whether the kids were being used as pawns, leverage, to get you guys in congress to pass an immigration bill that would include funding for the president's wall. here's the exchange. >> are you intending for this to play out as it is playing out? are you intending for parents to be separated from their children? are you intending to send a message? >> i find that offensive, no. because why would i ever create a policy that purposely does that? >> perhaps as a deterrent. >> no. >> your response, senator?
4:26 pm
>> she told a lot of whoppers at that press conference. she said there's no strategy of deterrence, yet that's exactly what john kelly and jeff sessions argued was the purpose of this, to send a message to families overseas, not to come to america. she said this is about smugglers. clearly when children are safely in the united states, they're not as risk of smugglers. that was a whopper. she said this is not being used as a pawn for legislation. yet that's exactly what the president said it was, that this was legislative leverage. she did not -- she told a whopper of omission as well. and that's that she said that people should just simply go to the ports of entry. but the ports of entry for those seeking asylum have been blocked. i went out there yesterday with a group of six other members of congress. we saw the border guard standing there checking papers and only letting those across the bridge
4:27 pm
who already had visas to come into the united states, or american passports and so forth. they were blocking those who didn't have papers, who would be asserting themselves for asylum. so they're essentially forcing people to cross the border illegally, or leave them stranded in these very dangerous mexican side of the border. >> they keep making the point that, well, congress, you guys could change this, via a law. and this is a nation that enforces its laws. there's a point. you want to say, we enforce this one, but not that one. that's not what a democracy should do. they're using that argument to say, it's on you. you all need to change the law. all they're doing is enforcing it. what do you say? >> well, they have a choice here of doing a civil infraction or a criminal infraction. they chose to launch a zero tolerance, criminal prosecution. they have chosen to make it very difficult for people at ports of
4:28 pm
entry to assert asylum. so it's a big, coordinated strategy to result in tearing, well, children away from their parents to send a political message, or to create legislative leverage. that is not acceptable under any moral code, to hurt children and parents in that fashion. not acceptable in any religious tradition. and if she's going to tell whoppers like that and keep repeating them, she simply needs to step down. we need somebody there with integrity. >> do you think she should resign as senator hirono and senator harris have called for? >> absolutely. 100%, because she's not being honest with americans, and it's so absolutely clear. she's contradicting her president. she's contradicting her chief of staff. she's contradicting the attorney general. and just making up these arguments as she goes. so, yeah, absolutely.
4:29 pm
>> senator merkley, thanks so much for your time. >> you're welcome. and next, the trump campaign asked to fork over millions in exchange for dirt on hillary clinton. that offer coming from a man with a heavy russian accent, but his team forgot about the russian request -- until now? one of the men involved, whose memory failed him, is going to come and answer our questions. plus, the justice department sperkt general speaking out about president trump's claim that its recent report exonerates him. does it? hi.
4:30 pm
it's me. your sleep number 360 smart bed... checking in. last night i warmed your feet so you fell asleep faster. i sensed you roll over and automatically softened your side to melt away pressure points and keep you sleeping blissfully. at 2am, this happened. so, i took care of it. does your bed do that? i'm the new sleep number 360 smart bed. now you can wake up to smarter sleep. let's meet, only at a sleep number store. i am totally blind. and non-24 can throw my days and nights out of sync, keeping me from the things i love to do. talk to your doctor, and call 844-214-2424.
4:31 pm
4:32 pm
i'm a small business, but i have... big dreams... and big plans. so how do i make the efforts of 8 employees... feel like 50? how can i share new plans virtually? how can i download an e-file? virtual tours? zip-file? really big files? in seconds, not minutes... just like that. like everything... the answer is simple. i'll do what i've always done... dream more, dream faster, and above all... now, i'll dream gig. now more businesses, in more places, can afford to dream gig. comcast, building america's largest gig-speed network. new tonight, two more cases of team trump forgetting russian contacts.
4:33 pm
the two are roger stone, president trump's long-time associate, and michael caputo, a former trump campaign communications official. now, stone now admits he met with a russian who wanted $2 million in exchange for dirt on hillary clinton. and stone says he failed to include this when he testified before the house intelligence committee. the person who set up the meeting for stone, michael caputo, who also didn't mention the incident when he testified before the house intelligence committee. so why are we just learning about this russian offer and meeting now? well, text messages in short. according to a text thread obtained by "the washington post," caputo asked stone, how crazy is the russian? wants big money for the info is and waste of time. caputo then texts, the russian way, anything at all interesting? stone, no. this exchange, of course, in text is a far cry from what the two men said just a year ago.
4:34 pm
here's stone. >> i didn't talk to anybody who was identifiably russian during the two-year run-up to this campaign. >> and caputo also made his position very clear. here he is speaking to our drew griffin. >> did you bring any russians to that campaign? did you talk about russia, or the possible help the russian government could give the campaign? >> never once. never once. >> definitive. michael caputo is here tonight, he wants to set the record straight and he's "outfront." good to have you back. we've spoken before, you've been a straight shooter when we've talked about these things. your testimony before bob mueller, as just an example. the context here, of course, is forgetting russia links is something we've seen a lot. jeff sessions forgot about meetings with the russian ambassador. jared kushner forgot about the trump tower meeting on his fbi security clearance forms. michael flynn forgot about contacts with with the russian ambassador and pleaded girgetuio
4:35 pm
perjury because of it. do you understand why people are suspicious of your forgetting? >> no doubt it isn't a good look for me, but it happens also to be a fact. by updating my testimony from july 2017, i fulfilled my obligation to the house of representatives select committee on intelligence. this was something that i didn't remember, an answer to a question where i should have responded to this, i said, not that i recall. this i do recall now, i recalled it when i was preparing for my testimony in may and then last month. i started preparing in mid april, and through a process that my attorney put me through in preparation, kind of a moot practice, it's something he said, you know, that i recalled
4:36 pm
during that process. and he said, well, listen, you gotta amend your testimony to the house investigation. it's closed now, but you gotta do it. you also have to reveal this to the senate if they ask and the mueller team if they ask. i prepared to do both of those things. at the first, the senate, nobody asked me something to where this would be responsive. remember, to this point, i thought this was just some guy who called me and i passed him off to roger stone. it was about two minutes of my life, and i still thought at that point that it was nothing. and then i went to mueller on may 2nd -- go ahead. >> i was curious, because from your timeline is you recalled it preparing for testimony to the senator and to mueller, not during either of those. >> right. no, no, not at all. >> what made you recall? what made it come to mind? >> i have a great attorney, dennis vaca was u.s. attorney in western new york, and new york
4:37 pm
attorney general. he has a pretty rigorous process to prepare somebody for this kind of an event, and it was during that process that i recalled it. to me, it was just one call from some guy and it went on from there. so when i went to the senate, they didn't ask. i went to mueller, and the mueller team asked me the exact same question that was in my house hearing. i mean, as far as i could tell, word for word. did any russian ever offer you information about the hillary clinton -- >> did they have the proof basically? >> they did. but when they asked me that question, i said yes. i was approached by a guy named henry greenberg. i think he was of russian descent, but an american citizen. he offered information, i bounced him over to roger stone. and roger stone met with him and figured out that he was a crack pot and he moved along. when i answered that way, i could tell that the color wlawy
4:38 pm
was questioning me, his face just fell. it was clear they avoided a perjury trap. because they thought that if i didn't answer it with the house correctly, that i wasn't going to answer it correctly with them. but since i had been through the exercise with my attorney, i recalled it when they asked. and i realized they knew more about this meeting than i did. >> right, because i know you're saying, you weren't at the meeting. we have the text messages afterwards, when stone told you he wants big money for the info. waste of time. did your lawyer get these messages? i'm curious what would make you remember if it was so insignificant, suddenly you remembered it? >> well, it was more along the lines of anything insignificant is important now, michael. it was that kind of a question. it was such a minutia that i guess over a process of a couple of weeks, i realized it was something i had to disclose. but in fact, when they asked me when it happened, when mueller team asked me when it happened, i said i thought it was in late june. i didn't know quite when. that's when they presented the
4:39 pm
text messages which confirmed that had happened right before may 29th, the date of the text messages. >> so i'm curious, because you say that this guy calls you, that you presume to be of russian descent. of course it turns out he's russian, not of russian descent. "the washington post" is talking about him having a thick russian accent. why at the time did this not trigger anything in your mind? someone with a trick russian accent calling, offering dirt on hillary clinton for money? that would be illegal. nothing triggered a red flag that you would have remembered it when you testified in front of the house? >> the timing of when the informant contacted me, it was in may when nobody was talking about russia as well. if i had been contacted by a french canadian, i would have still bounced him over to roger stone. our antenna weren't up for russia contacts at all in, in the media, in the hillary clinton campaign or in the trump
4:40 pm
campaign. >> were you open to then somebody from any place, friend or foe, providing information for money? that was on the able, you were open to it? i don't understand any other way to interpret this. >> this gentleman presented himself as an individual, not a person from the government of russia. and then if you read "the washington post" article, he was offering private information from a former employee of the clinton foundation. this isn't an approach from a government at all. except it's an approach from the united states government by an fbi informant who was working for the fbi for 17 years. >> what is your evidence of that? i guess i'm torn, because it doesn't in a sense matter if the person is an informant or not. what would matter was your intent and belief when you talk that phone call. at the time you didn't think -- >> well, i think it does matter. >> okay, why do you think it matters? >> it matters because right now we're going with the fallacy, this whole investigation started in late july. this is late may. it's two months earlier.
4:41 pm
so it would matter if an fbi informant contacted me, and indeed he did. so as far as i'm concerned -- >> what evidence do you have that this person was an fbi informant at that time? that's a very specific question. >> i don't have evidence. that wouldn't be available -- that wouldn't be available to me. the reason i know he was an fbi informant for the 17 yiears prir is because he's sworn affidavit out in california court to try to get another visa from the fbi. i mean, and then he always included, which is on my website, democrat dossier.org, where i have my stuff posted, democrat dossier.org, there are at least 17 informant visas get granted by the fbi in that dossier. as far as i'm concerned, he was -- and as far as a sworn affidavit under oath is concerned, he was an fbi informant for 17 years. the matter of whether or not he took, after that long career as an informant, if he took his day
4:42 pm
off and came to meet roger stone, i guess maybe he did. but now the onus is on the fbi to prove that he was not an fbi informant at the time he approached the trump campaign. >> hope hicks, back in november of 2016, she told the associated press at the time, spokesperson for the president, she said there was no communication between the campaign and any foreign entdty during the campaign. the president has echoed that sentiment again and again. here he is. >> i have nothing to do with russia. to the best of my knowledge, no person that i deal with does. >> back to this fundamental point, michael, 14 trump associates we now know had contacts with russians during the campaign or during the transition. does this concern you? i mean, i still find it hard to understand how, if a meeting was so insignificant, you then remembered it later? did you not, i guess prepare at all for the house testimony? is that the best way to explain it? >> no, not at all.
4:43 pm
i prepared for the house testimony the same way i prepared for the senate and the mueller testimony. but it's a two-minute conversation, two years before. so i know it's not a good look, but at the end of the day, i met my obligation for the house permanent select committee on intelligence, and i have no legal exposure here. in fact, this is an interaction that amounted to nothing. it's not even germane. the only thing we're talking about is whether i misrepresented myself on the select committee on intelligence. what we should be talking about is why the comey fbi decided to send a violent, russian, criminal, illegal alien, under their watch into a white collar investigation? i don't understand it. i think we need to find out -- we gotta get to the bottom of that. this guy was convicted of a gun crime in california. spent ten years in prison in russia. and yet he's working for the fbi. >> we're talking about henry greenberg. and again just to make the point
4:44 pm
that obviously you don't know at the time whether he was working or not. but the assumption you're making -- >> we need to know. >> we do not know. michael caputo, thanks so much, i appreciate your time tonight. >> thanks, erin. appreciate it. and next, cnn just learning republicans could hold the d deputy attorney general ros rhodrode rosenstein in contempt. plus, the trump administration defending its policy of separating children from parents at the border. tonight, you'll meet a family. you get another day in paradise. get a sunset on a sunday. get more stories to share. get more from your summer getaway with exclusive hilton offers. book yours, only at hilton.com ...to give you the protein you need with less of the sugar you don't. i'll take that. [cheers] 30 grams of protein and 1 gram of sugar. new ensure max protein. in two great flavors.
4:45 pm
you introduce the all-new ford ecosport and surprise people with how much they can get in a small suv. that means more standard features and more upgrades for a lot less than expected. the all-new ecosport. it's the big upgrade in a small package. from ford, america's best-selling brand. see what you can get for under 20 grand with the all-new ecosport.
4:46 pm
i thought i was managing my moderater 20 grand to severe crohn's disease. then i realized something was missing... me. my symptoms were keeping me from being there. so, i talked to my doctor and learned humira is for people who still have symptoms of crohn's disease after trying other medications. and the majority of people on humira saw significant symptom relief and many achieved remission in as little as 4 weeks. humira can lower your ability to fight infections, including tuberculosis. serious, sometimes fatal infections and cancers, including lymphoma, have happened; as have blood, liver, and nervous system problems, serious allergic reactions, and new or worsening heart failure. before treatment, get tested for tb. tell your doctor if you've been to areas where certain fungal infections are common, and if you've had tb, hepatitis b, are prone to infections, or have flu-like symptoms or sores. don't start humira if you have an infection. be there for you, and them. ask your gastroenterologist about humira. with humira, remission is possible.
4:47 pm
i'm 85 years old in a job where. i have to wear a giant hot dog suit. what? where's that coming from? i don't know. i started my 401k early, i diversified... i'm not a big spender. sounds like you're doing a lot. but i still feel like i'm not gonna have enough for retirement. like there's something else i should be doing. with the right conversation, you might find you're doing okay. so, no hot dog suit? not unless you want to. no. schedule a complimentary goal planning session today with td ameritrade®.
4:48 pm
but prevagen helps your brain with an ingredient originally discovered... in jellyfish. in clinical trials, prevagen has been shown to improve short-term memory. prevagen. the name to remember. breaking news contempt, a source telling cnn tonight that congress can move in days to hold deputy attorney general rod rosenstein in contempt. refusing to hand over all the documents is outraging all the republicans. manu raju is out front. >> reporter: they have been demanding documents for some time. this relates to a subpoena that was issued in march.
4:49 pm
clinton e-mail, clinton foundation. any records surveillance with carter page. they have been getting a lot have them but they are asking for a whole lot more. i am told there is a closed door meeting on friday. three committee chairman, they all said they need this information by this coming friday and if not, they are warning of quote consequences f for rod rosenstein. and some want to go further and
4:50 pm
impea impea impeach rod rosenstein. >> thank you. i want to go straight to carrie cordero. >> first the house would have to actually vote. if the house passes the ruling on contempt, then the house would have to go to court to enforce it. first of all, if they voted that could persuade the justice department into complying, the threat of contempt. the judge could have rod rosenstein fined. he or she could hold him, and threaten jail. so there is potentially harsh consequences. the more likely scenario is that the judge would negotiate some type of agreement in terms of what documents would be
4:51 pm
provided. >> the repercussions, the threat would be significant. trump said the inspector general report totally exonerates him. he is talking about russia. so today in the hearing, the man who wrote the report, michael horowitz was specifically asked whether trump was exonerated and here is the exchange. >> there is nothing in the report that says it exonerates the president, is that correct. >> we did not look into collusion questions. >> pretty clear. he is saying they did not look into collusion, but trump is saying he is totally exonerated and saying it loudly and widely. does the president have a leg to stand on with that claim? >> no. i read the report. this report was about the fbi's handling of the hillary clinton
4:52 pm
e-mail investigation. and it had nothing to do with the inquiry into russian interference in the election or anything related to the campaign. it is not true. it is not what this report is about. >> thank you, very much. i appreciate it. good to see you. >> and next, the breaking news, the white house standing by and defending the policy of separating young children from their parents. see what the personal effect this policy is having. (vo) we came here for the friends.
4:53 pm
and we got to know the friends of our friends. and we found others just like us. and just like that we felt a little less alone. but then something happened. we had to deal with spam, fake news, and data misuse. that's going to change. from now on, facebook will do more to keep you safe and protect your privacy. because when this place does what it was built for, then we all get a little closer.
4:54 pm
wi'm really grateful that usaaq. was able to take care of my family while i was overseas serving. it was my very first car accident. we were hit from behind. i called usaa and the first thing they asked was 'are you ok?' they always thank you for your service, which is nice because as a spouse you serve too. we're the hayles and we're usaa members for life. see how much you could save with usaa by bundling your auto and home insurance. get a quote today. the toothpaste that helps prevent bleeding gums. if you spit blood when you brush or floss you may have gum problems and could be on the journey to much worse. help stop the journey of gum disease. try parodontax toothpaste. ♪
4:56 pm
4:57 pm
rosa flores is "outfront." >> reporter: this is what family separation looks like. a father taking sanctuary in a mexico search. ignacio is desperate. his wife and four children detained. and held in three different detention centers in three different u.s. states. the family asked for asylum at the border last month and now their future together looks grim. attorney general jeff sessions limited asylum protections. protections ignacio's family was counting on when they left guatemala. every time he dials his three youngest kids 3,000 miles away
4:58 pm
at a new york detention center. after several unsuccessful tries, his video finally connects. his two youngest boys ages two and six don't want to talk to their dad. a therapist tell him his kids feel abandoned and blame him. he tried to clean up his increasingly dangerous neighborhood in guatemala leading a civil police patrol. arming themselves with clubs and machetes. but protecting his community put him and his family in the cross hair of gangs. i am asking if they protected their identities.
4:59 pm
joined the migrant caravan with plans of seeking asylum in the u.s. his 20-year-old was sent to a detention center in san diego. his wife maria ended up in a detention center in texas with three youngest boys. only to be split again when the boys were sent to a new york detention center two weeks later. i.c.e. says she has a criminal record for lying about being a u.s. citizen in 1999. spending 25 days in a u.s. prison. his voice breaks after saying goodbye to his son. now if you are wondering why this dad stayed in a mexico church, he said he made the
5:00 pm
decision of staying behind because he got deported. and -- several years ago. and sent his wife and children hoping that asylum laws would protect them. >> thank you for joining us, anderson starts now. >> good evening, top administration official says we are a country of compassion, a country of heart. as she said it, children were being held behind chain linked fencing. as she spoke of compassion, people of all strides were being watched. in the last six weeks, upwards of 2,000 children experienced this trauma. so we begin tonight
193 Views
1 Favorite
IN COLLECTIONS
CNN (San Francisco) Television Archive Television Archive News Search Service The Chin Grimes TV News ArchiveUploaded by TV Archive on