and since the onset of the drought we've doubled our efforts. i grew up in the forests out in this area and honestly it's heartbreaking to see all these trees dying. what guides me is ensuring that the public is going to be safer and that these forests can be sustained and enjoyed by the community in the future. this is "gps," the global public square. welcome to all of you in the united states and around the world. i'm fareed zakaria. today on the show, borders, migrants and public sentiment. i'll start by talking to the united nations human rights chief, zaid ron el hussein. what is his take on u.s. policy regarding children at the border?

what about president trump's apparent fix after the uproar? also, why immigration, why now, why such passion on both sides of the argument? i have a great panel to discuss. and a new arms race in space. this week, president trump announced a sixth branch of the u.s. military, a space force. >> we are going to have the air force and we are going to have the space force. separate by equal. >> what would it do, and is it a good idea? the great neil de grasse tyson helps us understand. >> it would be nice if peace in space led the way to peace on earth. but first, here's my take. democrats are exulting that donald trump had to reverse his policy of separating immigrant families at the border. and there is good reason to celebrate. the policy was mean-spirited and

unnecessary. but i do wonder whether trump's retreat will prove to be as damaging to the president as liberals think. the president's cruelty made it easy to oppose his policy, but in their delight, the trump administration's latest missteps, democrats may be walking into a trap. the larger question is surely, should the country enforce its immigration laws, or if si circumvented, should we just give up? according to a u.n. report, last year the united states became the world's leading destination for asylum-seekers with a 44% increase of central americans who compromised almost half the total at about 140,000. david frum suggests in the atlantic that most of these people probably come to escape poverty rather than violence, which is actually declining, and that many hope bringing children will help them avoid punishment. that's why when asked in 2014 about the tens of thousands of

unaccompanied children who had come to the border, hillary clinton responded. >> we have to send a clear message, just because your child gets across the border, that doesn't mean the child gets to stay. so we don't want to send a message that is contrary to our laws or will encourage more children to make that dangerous journey. >> immigration has become an issue that motivates a large group of americans passionately. perhaps like no other. some of this might be rooted in racism. but it also represents a kind of heightened nationalism. in an era of rampant globalization, people want to believe that they still maintain some sense of stability and control. nationalism has been around for centuries. but it is now in a sense the last doctrine standing. the great story of the 20th century was the loss of faith between the asen can'ts of science, socialism and secularism, people lost their ability to put their trust in

the dogmas and duties of religion. but this didn't change the reality that people wanted something they could believe in, something with which they could have a deep, emotional bond. nationalism has increasingly become that substitute. being endowed with a strong and almost mystical attachment. and immigration has become the litmus test of nationalism. perhaps because other sources have faded or become politically unmentionable. as western societies became more diverse and as minority groups within them asserted their own identities, it became more difficult to define nationalism by ethnic or religious terms. so what is left? how does one define a nation? for americans, political ideas and ideology have always been at the heart of nationalism. that's why being a communist could be thought of as unamerican. but beyond ideology, there has always been, be even in america, a more emotional conception of

the nation. and immigration has become a proxy for that gut feeling, the sense the country must be able to define itself, choose whom it will allow to come in, and privilege its own citizens over foreigners. in politics, people remember a few simple things. to illustrate that point, a poster in the 1980s once told me a story. a focus group asked a man whom he would vote for in the 1984 elections. ronald reagan or his democratic opponent, walter mondale. reagan, the man replied. monday dale is a communist. it was explained this wasn't actually true. the man replied, well, maybe. i'll still vote for reagan. one thing i know, nobody has ever thought he was a communist. donald trump might have lost this round, but no one will ever think he is soft on illegal immigration. for more, go to cnn.com/fareed and read my "washington post" column this week. and let's get started.

the policy of separating children from their parents at the border didn't, of course, just arouse passions in the united states. the pope spoke about it, backing u.s. catholic leaders who called it immoral. macron, trudeau, even the supreme leader of iran criticized the policy. and my guest, the u.n. human rights chief, said it was unconscionable and called on the practice to be halted. he joins me now from geneva. you quoted the american association of paediatrics and said this is essentially government-practiced child abuse. government-sanctioned child abuse. the administration's response, even though it has now reversed policy, has been to say, look,

we cannot allow people to come in here deliberately to break the law. these people are coming in illegally, and the country has to be able to protect its borders. how do you respond to that? >> well, the point that you made i think was an important one, fareed. that the problem across the world was very clear. there must be a humane way by which those seeking asylum can access not just legal help, but are entitled to individual assessment. and if there are conditions of detention, they must be a last resort. and the detention must be kept to a minimum, especially where children are concerned. and clearly, the separation of children from families is absolutely prohibited under international human rights law, and even if the u.s. is not party to the treaty that governs this, it needs to respect international standards. and so as you said, we were

pleased to see that the president has reversed course on this. >> you point out the u.s. has actually not -- has not signed the convention on the rights of the child. in your view, should it? >> oh, yes. the u.s. is the only country not to have exceeded to it. and certainly it should. but, again, even if it doesn't carry that obligation, it should meet and respect the international standard. and it's simply -- of course, not good for the reputation of the united states worldwide. the united states has been a chief architect of the human rights system that we have in place, that was put together after the second world war. and so to be taking such measures is clearly -- it doesn't do itself any credit. and, again, i think the response that you cited is demonstrative of that.

>> it's been a tough week for the human rights council in other ways. the united states has withdrawn. i think the first member state to ever do this. and nikki haley and the administration officials argue that, look, this is a -- this is a rights council that makes a mockery of the name. you have countries like cuba and venezuela and saudi arabia, known human rights abusers on it. do they have a point that these -- if these countries are under, the whole thing is a sham? >> well, there is certainly a point to be made on composition. and we ourselves have said that especially if you have members who are not cooperating with my office, which is distinct from the human rights council, or other human rights mechanisms, the -- then they, of course, should -- their whole membership -- our membership needs to be revisited.

and we agree. and i have cited, for example, in the past the examples of venezuela and ber undebeing members not cooperating with the council and therefore their membership needs to be reviewed. >> what happens when the most powerful country in the world is absent from the council? you try to present very tough reports. you have this one on venezuela. you have this one on kashmir against a very powerful country, the government of india. presumably not having america at the table is going to make it less likely that these reports are taken seriously. >> well, i think you've hit -- the nail right on the head. you're absolutely right, fareed. we produced our second report on venezuela. it is a hard-hitting report. my office produced it. and the human rights council is a place of destination.

that's where the report would norm normally be considered informally because it hasn't been asked of me to produce it. and when we look in the past, we did the same on yemen, for example. we produced a succession of reports, and after three years, the human rights council produced an investigation, an international investigation. and we've asked now the same for venezuela. we've asked the same for the situation in kashmir on both sides of the line of control. and like that, you're absolutely right. if the u.s. is not at the table to discuss these issues, then it's hard to see how you can move them forward. and so one hopes that the u.s. will reconsider its position. it seems to be premised almost entirely, if one were to speak openly, about the issue of the item seven, the so-called item seven, where there's a singular agenda item for the occupied

palestinian territories. and israel feels that, of course, and from a view of the united states, that it's being singled out. but that seems to be the principle cause for its departure. >> and what's the response? what response do you have to the argument that the council focuses too much and too obsessively on israel and that occupation? >> well, i think the record shows that while this may have well been the case, you know, 10 to 15 years ago, over the last ten years, the number -- the number of resolutions focused on israel has dropped. and others -- you know, our viewing of other crises and other human rights situations have expanded. and clearly if there was a political horizon in terms of advancing the peace process and i think the movement of the u.s. embassy to jerusalem has complicated the possibilities of coming out with a result. and now it does look very

difficult. admittedly, i don't see an easy way to resolve that particular problem. but my hope is that the u.s. would reevaluate its position and come back. and we still have a lot of important work to do, and yes, the u.s. does play an important role. >> pleasure to have you on. >> thank you, fareed. next on "gps," we'll dig in deeper. just why is immigration such a hot topic in america, and who won this round? the left or the right? when we come back, nick kristof, be linda chavez and ray han sa juan. ♪ bright copper kettles and warm woolen mittens ♪ ♪ brown paper packages tied up with strings ♪ ♪ these are a few of my favorite things ♪ ♪ ♪

♪ these are a few of my favorite things ♪ join t-mobile. and get netflix included for the whole family. so you can get lost in space in your own backyard... or get pumped up for your grand entrance. only t-mobile lets you watch your favorite movies and shows in more places, without paying more. get an unlimited family plan with netflix on us. and right now at t-mobile, buy one samsung galaxy s9 and get one free.

(male friend) thanks for the invite! (anna) front row? nobody puts baby in a corner. yippee ki yay movielovers. (vo) download the atom app and get $5 off your first ticket. billions of problems. sore gums? bleeding gums? painful flossing? there's a therabreath for you. therabreath healthy gums oral rinse fights gingivitis and plaque and prevents gum disease for 24 hours. so you can... breathe easy, there's therabreath at walmart. if you have moderate to severe or psoriatic arthritis, little things can be a big deal. that's why there's otezla. otezla is not an injection or a cream. it's a pill that treats differently. for psoriasis, 75% clearer skin is achievable with reduced redness, thickness, and scaliness of plaques. and for psoriatic arthritis, otezla is proven to reduce joint swelling, tenderness, and pain.

and the otezla prescribing information has no requirement for routine lab monitoring. don't use if you're allergic to otezla. otezla may cause severe diarrhea, nausea, or vomiting. tell your doctor if these occur. otezla is associated with an increased risk of depression. tell your doctor if you have a history of depression or suicidal thoughts, or if these feelings develop. some people taking otezla reported weight loss. your doctor should monitor your weight and may stop treatment. other side effects include upper respiratory tract infection and headache. tell your doctor about all the medicines you take and if you're pregnant or planning to be. ♪ otezla. show more of you. so just why has immigration

become such a divisive topic in america today and which side of the aisle has the upper hand politically? joining me to talk about that and more, nicholas kristoff is an op-ed columnist. and the executive editor of the national review. linda, you are a conservative republican. he worked for ronald reagan on these issues. and i'm wondering what you think has changed? because ronald reagan was once asked something about illegal aliens, and he said, i have another word for illegal aliens. it's willing workers. a long way from today. >> that's exactly right. and in fact, i think he would be mystified by what's going on. and by the way, illegal immigration when ronald reagan was president was actually at a higher level than it is to see. so this whole idea that there is this huge infusion of people coming across the border, it's a crisis, we have to do something about, we've got to build walls, we've got to keep people out,

simply doesn't comport with the facts. and unfortunately, i think that the republican party has seized on this issue as a way to galvanize working class whites to try to turn their economic anxiety into a kind of fear of immigrants, that immigrants are stealing their jobs. and i think that's bad for the republican party, bad for conservatism and bad for america. >> so nick, does that suggest a kind of increased -- inevitable polarization where the republican party is going for this white working class vote that is anxious economically and culturally, the democratic party trying to build this coalition of immigrants, and therefore can't imagine any kind of sensible measures that will restrict it? >> you know, i think that may have been true historically. i do think that there are a couple of things now that will create more opportunities and one is the fact that, look, we're down to a 3.9% unemployment rate. i'm from an area in rural oregon

where there was deep resentment in the white working class at immigrants, perception that they were partly to blame for the deep economic troubles there. but it's a lot harder to feel that resentment when unemployment is this slow, when there are jobs available, signs everywhere. and i think the other thing that has really changed is, indeed, the fact that president trump is in office and that there is this very deep revulsion at the family separation. and i don't think immediately, but i do think that creates some opportunity over time to try to actually address these issues. >> let me ask you, because you've generally been on the more conservative side on immigration. nick's argument, and he's made it in his column, that the family separation is so brutal, that it's immoral in his view and unconscionable, but also it might back fire politically for the republicans. >> i think there's definitely

something to that. of if you look at the anti-war movement when george w. bush was president, it was large, it was vibrant, it was very powerful and influential. as soon as barack obama was inaugurated, however, that anti-war movement really receded very, very quickly. oftentimes in our politics you see a kind of thermostatic reaction in which when you have the other party in power, you polarize the rest of the public against a given position. so before donald trump was on the political scene, the american public was somewhat more restrictionist. once donald trump came on the scene, the american public has actually moved very quickly and very drastically towards a more favorable position towards immigration. the question is whether or not that's actually durable when you think about some of the larger issues. and one of the larger issues, i dare say, is what happens to immigrants after they have been in the country for 10 or 20 years. the emphasis right now is on harrowing stories at the border and ennobling sacrifices they

make. you see a silent crisis that no one wants to talk about. fareed, you and i both live in new york and have lived in new york city for many years. you now see a rash of suicides among mostly men who have been in the country for 20, 30-plus years. these are people who have seen very little if anything in the way of earnings growth. these are people who are not fresh and new and bright-eyed. these are not people who believe in the american dream. these are people who have had their dreams deferred, and in some cases feel their dreams have been betrayed. these are people the right doesn't talk about, because they do not speak to immigrants. and these are people the left, particularly the pro immigration left, doesn't want to talk about, because then you see he that integration is a real challenge is a stratified, unequal society. >> we are going to have to come back and talk about exactly this, integration and assimilation. census data says that white americans will constitute less than 50% of the population in fewer than 30 years and it is

statistics like that that stoke fear and anger among trump's pace. linda chavez has been studying this for years and we're going to ask her for her conclusions when we come back. with tripadvisor, finding your perfect hotel at the lowest price... is as easy as dates, deals, done! simply enter your destination and dates... and see all the hotels for your stay! tripadvisor searches over 200 booking sites... to show you the lowest prices... so you can get the best deal on the right hotel for you.

dates, deals, done! tripadvisor. visit tripadvisor.com it's these new fresh-fx car air fresheners from armor all. each scent can create a different mood in my car. like tranquil skies. armor all, it's easy to smell good. ♪ now that i'm on my way ♪ do you still think i'm crazy standing here today ♪ ♪ i couldn't make you love me applebee's 2 for $20, now with steak. now that's eatin' good in the neighborhood.

i'm a small business, but i have... big dreams... and big plans. so how do i make the efforts of 8 employees... feel like 50? how can i share new plans virtually? how can i download an e-file? virtual tours? zip-file? really big files? in seconds, not minutes... just like that. like everything... the answer is simple. i'll do what i've always done... dream more, dream faster, and above all... now, i'll dream gig. now more businesses, in more places, can afford to dream gig. comcast, building america's largest gig-speed network.

and we are back with nick kristof, linda chavez and rayhan salan. there has been a concern, rayhan mentioned it, and many others have, that assimilation is not working as it should. you have studied assimilation for many, many years now. and let me tell you the specific one i remember, my old dissertation adviser, sam huntington, had, which was about mechani mexicans. and his argument was generally assimilation in america works great but there are too many mexicans, they too many too fast, they live too close to the border, it's too easy to go back and forth and that has produced a huge problem. and clearly there is the political reality that people did feel that way. do the numbers bear this out? >> well, i -- admiring of samuel huntington. he has been -- was a terrific

public intellectual and scholar. he was simply wrong about mexican-americans. and one of the things that always amused me is that he used new mexico as his example of hispanics who have not assimilated. well, they weren't immigrants, number one. they were people like my family that came in the 1600s, settled in the state, and it is true that you can go to little towns in northern new mexico and find older people whose first language is still spanish, and by the way, it's the 17th century version of spanish. it's not what's spoken in mexico today. hispanics are integrating. i wrote a book about this in 1991 and did a lot of research and data on what happens. part of the problem is that it's obscured -- the numbers are obscured, because we have so many new people coming in. it's like taking a snapshot of the lower east side in 1913 and assuming the jews were never going to amount to anything. when you have lots of people coming in, the numbers overall are going to show a depressed

level. what's important to look at is the second generation. and for hispanics, second generation hispanics who were born here in the united states, 97% of them speak english. they attend college at rates comparable to those of whites, and they're moving into the middle class. >> what about central americans who are even poorer than mexicans? >> actually, cato institute just did a study and shows exactly the same rates. in fact, they show college graduation rates for second-generation central americans the same as that of americans overall. >> nick, you -- people by now have realized this. but you are the child of immigrants, and from ukraine. >> i'm the newbie here. >> did you feel like -- is there a challenge that people don't realize when you were growing up? >> i mean, i do think that kids tend to be sensitive to any way in which they're different. and so, you know, i remember

being sensitive to my dad having a strong accent. this kind of thing. you know, i hope that we're getting to the point when we look around and realize that what immigrants bring is strength to the economy. strength to the society. and every bit of economic analysis tends to bear that out. that immigrants contribute more to social security. >> but there is some data that they depress the wages of poor, black and hispanic workers, for example. >> so, yeah. in terms of low-wage american-born workers there is ambiguous data. i think it's reasonable to suspect that there may be some issues there that overall economy benefits that low wage workers, people who dropped out of high school, maybe only have a high school degree, may face difficulties. and it's a fair criticism that elites making policy weren't sensitive enough to the issue and didn't try to address it.

but i think if we look at overall policy, then we have to look at the benefits. and i think it's also worth noting that, you know, between the u.s. and mexico now, according to pew, net migration is, if anything, toward mexico. and what we've been seeing -- >> in other words, more people are going back than are coming to the united states from mexico. >> that's correct. and central america has been a real source of immigration across the southern border. but that's because of huge violence in honduras, el salvador, guatemala, and violence -- it seems to be going down again. so there is some reason to think that we are still living with the consequences of the terrible gang violence there. and that, you know, over the next few years that may no longer be as salient an issue as it is today. >> final thought. is this immigration crisis going to peter out if nick and linda are right, there isn't as big a problem, it's getting better. this is not going to dominate american politics.

>> i'm afraid not. i see things quite differently for this reason. when we talk about assimilation as people learning to speak english, it is absolutely proceeding a pace. however, immigration is a differentiated phenomenon. people bring with them different skills, networks and opportunities to the united states. and what we are seeing is a bifurcation. immigrants flourishing and entering the mainstream and other immigrants being ghettoized and racialized. people finding themselves trapped in enclaves and also who are neglected, precisely because their stories aren't heart warming stories, so their stories are forgotten. this is a big issue now, it will be a bigger issue in the future. this is going to be something we are going to deal with for many decades to come. the question is, will we deal with it realistically and thoughtfully. >> we have to close on that. and we will definitely revisit this issue. thank you all. fascinating. next on "gps," why are

countries from scandinavian to poland restarting military drafts or even welcoming the u.s. military in ways they have never done before? i will give you a hint. it has all to do with a big bully that is close by. when we come back. hi.i just wanted to tell you that chevy won a j.d.power dependability award for its midsize car-the chevy malibu. i forgot. chevy also won a j.d. power dependability award for its light-duty truck the chevy silverado. oh, and since the chevy equinox and traverse also won chevy is the only brand to earn the j.d. power dependability award across cars, trucks and suvs-three years in a row. phew. third time's the charm... you made moonshine in a backwoods still. smuggled booze and dodged the law. even when they brought you in, they could never hold you down. when i built my family tree and found you, i found my sense of adventure. i set off on a new life, a million miles away.

i'm heidi choiniere, and this is my ancestry story. now with over 10 billion historical records, discover your story. get started for free at ancestry.com discover your story. introducing the world's first sthe new ego string trimmer. with powerload™ technology. feed the line. push the button. and get back to work. with an industry first, carbon-fiber shaft... lawn care has never been this easy... ...or this powerful. the new ego power+ string trimmer with powerload™ technology. exclusively at the home depot and ego authorized dealers. anyone can get you ready,

holiday inn express gets you the readiest. because ready gives a pep talk. showtime! but the readiest gives a pep rally. i cleared my inbox! holiday inn express, be the readiest. holiday inn express, you don't want to live with mom and dad forever, do you? i'm making smoothies! so, how can i check my credit score? credit karma. don't worry, it's free. hmmmmm. credit karma. give yourself some credit.

hello. let's go for a ride on a peloton. let's go grab a couple thousand friends and chase each other up a hill. let's go make a personal best, then beat it with your personal better than best. let's go bring the world's best instructors right to you. better yet, let's go bring the entire new york studio - live. let's go anytime, anywhere, with anyone who's willing. and let's go do it all right here. ready to go? peloton. now for our what in the world segment. the widely popular norwegian television thriller "occupied" has been described as homeland

for anxious europeans. set in the not so distant future, it imagines a country turned upside down by what it most fears. in this case, that's not islamist terror, it is a russian invasion. now you may think it's just a tv show, but a look at what's happening in the region suggests that art is imitating life. norway has asked the united states to more than double the number of marines training in the country to about 700, and station them nearer to the border with russia. an action that has riled moscow. finland welcomed marine tanks and training exercises for the first time in history and increased the size of its army by 20%. and peace-loving sweden, conflict free for the past 200 years, issued pamphlets last month to households, readying them in case of war. last year it brought back the draft. and it's not just scandinavian that's been beefing up defense. poland has offered the united states up to $2 billion to set

up a military base there. and last week, the u.s. army and nato completed saber strike 18, a massive 18,000-troop training exercise. there's more. lithuania and latvia increased military spending by 21% last year, romania increased spending by 50%, according to the stockholm international peace research institute. what do all these countries have in common? well, they're all pretty vulnerable to a giant pro vac tour next door. the change for this region came when russia annexed crimea. that was a wake-up call for its neighbors, many of which had been cocooned in a post world war calm. and only emboldened russia. sweden and finland, neither of which enjoy the protection of nato membership have both

complained of russian incursions in their air space. nato says from 2013 to 2015, russian air traffic close to its european members air space increased by about 70%. in 2013, russia simulated a nuclear attack against sweden, according to nato, and russian fighter planes have lately been flying dangerously close to american aircraft in the region. and then there are the war games. in september, russia conducted a massive military exercise with belarus under putin's watchful eye. russia said 13,000 troops were involved but the united states and nato say the number was closer to 100,000. you might say that military exercises are mere saber rattling, but similar exercises immediately preceded russia's offensives in georgia and crimea according to the endowment for international peace. and russia's immediate neighbors are woefully outgunned. russia's army is among the

largest in the world. it spent $66 billion on defense last year. sweden, finiland and norway combined spent less than $16 billion. the baltic states weren't even close. it's easy for americans to look at the russian threat through the prism of partisan politics. russian aggression can feel abstract, more of a nuisance an an urgent concern. some charge that the kremlin influenced trump's campaign in secret meetings, which is at the heart of a long u.s. investigation. it certainly meddled in the elections by marshalling an online army, one we could not see. but for countries in eastern europe, some of which are within an hour's drive of st. petersburg, things look very different. even with nato's presence, russia could capture them in a matter of days, according to a recent rand report. so they are all doing a lot more than making tv shows about it. up next, does america need another branch of the armed services? well, if the army, navy, air

force, marines and coast guards weren't enough, the space force will soon be coming to a galaxy near you. but is it a good idea? i will ask neil de grasse tyson. ! with lobster and shrimp together in so many new ways. like new cedar plank seafood bake, roasted to perfection. or new caribbean lobster and shrimp. but hurry in. lobster & shrimp summerfest won't last. you're smart,eat you already knew that. but it's also great for finding the perfect used car.

you'll see what a fair price is and you can connect with a truecar certified dealer. now you're even smarter. this is truecar. like concert tickets or a new snowboard. matt: whoo! whoo! jen: but that all changed when we bought a house. matt: voilà! jen: matt started turning into his dad. matt: mm. that's some good mulch. ♪ i'm awake. but it was pretty nifty when jen showed me how easy it was to protect our home and auto with progressive. [ wrapper crinkling ] get this butterscotch out of here. progressive can't protect you from becoming your parents. there's quite a bit of work, 'cause this was all -- this was all stapled. but we can protect your home and auto when you bundle with us. but we can protect your home and auto join t-mobile. and get netflix included for the whole family.

so you can get lost in space in your own backyard... or get pumped up for your grand entrance. only t-mobile lets you watch your favorite movies and shows in more places, without paying more. get an unlimited family plan with netflix on us. and right now at t-mobile, buy one samsung galaxy s9 and get one free.

at the marine mammal center, the environment is everything. we want to do our very best for each and every animal, and we want to operate a sustainable facility. and pg&e has been a partner helping us to achieve that. we've helped the marine mammal center go solar, install electric vehicle charging stations, and become more energy efficient. pg&e has allowed us to be the most sustainable organization we can be. any time you help a customer, it's a really good feeling. it's especially so when it's a customer that's doing such good and important work for the environment. together, we're building a better california.

>> space force, space force! >> space force. space force! so we have the army, the navy, the air force, the marines, the coast guard. but we have the air force. now we're going to have the space force. >> the crowd apparently loves the idea of a space force, as does the president. that was from a wednesday neutrally in minnesota, two days after trump announced the creation of a sixth branch of the united states armed forces. but the announcement raised more questions than it answered, so we called our favorite astro physicist, neil de grasse tyson, head of the haden planetarium and author of "astrophysics for people in a hurry," which has been a best seller knew for almost 60 weeks. neil, pleasure to have you on. >> great to be back, fareed.

thanks. >> so is this a good thing? that trump has announced? >> i've thought a lot about it. but i don't have a strong opinion. the idea of a space force is not a fundamentally odd, when you consider that the army, 70 years ago, birthed the air force. there was the army air force. and once we realized that technology and war fighting capabilities evolve -- >> and was going to take place up -- >> in the air space rather than the ground space, then it was sensible to suggest that perhaps this should be an entire branch of the military unto itself. so today all space capabilities of the military are handled by the air force. that was the natural extension of what the air force people did. and it's huge.

air force controls gps -- >> right. most people don't realize -- >> i know someone who has a show called "gps." >> most people don't realize that gps, which is really now basically the underpinnings of the digital economy -- >> yes. >> everything we do in terms of location. >> billions of dollars of commerce -- >> is funded on the back -- of an infrastructure sustained, run by the u.s. air force. >> by the u.s. air force, that's correct. and there's an entire place where that happens in colorado. the point is that we, as a nation, have assets in space of incalculable value. and so when you think of what a military does, as a minimum, they would protect a nation's interest, a nation's assets, and space is another place. you have the ground, you have the air and you have space. so it's not a weird idea to say we perhaps should have a space force. the question is, does the air force think that they can't

handle it under the current administrative, bureaucratic structures. and if not, then maybe it's a good idea. but if the generals say we've got this, then i don't see the need to force it on them. >> what i also have noticed in the last few months is that the chinese and the russians have gotten more active, in very interesting ways. so the chinese went up and destroyed one of their old satellites. and the russians went up and essentially deactivated one. and i thought that they were in some sense signaling, you know, we have the capacity to go up into space and to screw around with stuff or to destroy it entirely. the fact they could do it to theirs means they could just as easily do it to >> every single thing you do in space is a capability, okay? can you send people into space? can you dock in space? can you space walk? can you stay in space for

months, for a year? can you retrieve a satellite? can you store a satellite? you make note of this. once you have this checklist, then yourself as well as your adversaries will look to see whether any of these can be sort of weaponized or used for nefarious purposes. >> do you think it's inevitable that space becomes an arena for conflict? >> the u.n. space treaty that promises peaceful uses of outer space. by the way, there's more than no nukes in space, if there's astronauts in need from another country, you're obligated to assist them. it's a very nicely worded document. but there's a part of me that always says, why do we promise we'll treat each other nicely in space? if that's successful, why don't we have a peaceful use of earth treaty? if it works there, it seems to me it should work on earth, and if we can't get it to work on

earth, why should i have any confidence at all that somehow we're in space and we'll all be friends. >> why should the arena matter? it's political tensions that cause the rivalry. >> human nature scares the hell out of me. so i'm -- so i don't know. i think -- it would be nice if peace in space led the way to peace on earth. that would be kind of good. when you're in space you have a very different view of earth. earth is like, whoa. how come i don't see the color-coded countries that were in my school room globe? oh, because we made those lines. they're artificially created. we're humans on the speck of a planet we call earth. >> and it seems so small and fragile. >> because it is small and fragile, it doesn't seem that way, it is small and fragile. by the way, i serve on a board

of the pentagon, the defense innovation board, but i'm not speaking for that board nor, obviously, for the pentagon. by the way, there are future needs and concerns of what a space force would have to think about, such as asteroid defense. that's a complete space-based threat to the livelihood, not only of the nation but of the world. and it may be that the cooperation of the world in space is to save civilization. and that could be the greatest force of peace there ever was. >> neil degrasse tyson, thank you very much. >> thank you. a theme-based park about

corruption. where it would go when we come back. high performance line. experience exhilaration crafted to the extreme. experience amazing at your lexus dealer. and that's how he intended to keep it. then he met the love of his life. who came with a three foot, two inch bonus. for this new stepdad, it's promising to care for his daughter as if she's his own. every way we look out for those we love is an act of mutuality. we can help with the financial ones. learn more or find an advisor at massmutual.com

we can help with the financial ones. ♪ ♪ i love you baby applebee's 2 for $20, now with steak. now that's eatin' good in the neighborhood. by staying in rhythm. and to keep up this pace, i drink boost optimum. boost optimum with 5 in 1 advanced nutrition helps support muscle, energy, bone, normal immune function, and vision. boost optimum. be up for life. ...most people. but on the inside, i feel chronic, widespread pain. fibromyalgia may be invisible to others,

but my pain is real. fibromyalgia is thought to be caused by overactive nerves. lyrica is believed to calm these nerves. i'm glad my doctor prescribed lyrica. for some, lyrica delivers effective relief from moderate to even severe fibromyalgia pain, and improves function. lyrica may cause serious allergic reactions, suicidal thoughts or actions. tell your doctor right away if you have these, new or worse depression, unusual changes in mood or behavior, swelling, trouble breathing, rash, hives, blisters, muscle pain with fever, tired feeling, or blurry vision. common side effects: dizziness, sleepiness, weight gain, swelling of hands, legs and feet. don't drink alcohol while taking lyrica. don't drive or use machinery until you know how lyrica affects you. those who've had a drug or alcohol problem may be more likely to misuse lyrica. with less pain i can do more with my family. talk to your doctor today. see if lyrica can help.

talk to your doctor today. does your business internet provider promise a lot? let's see who delivers more. comcast business gives you gig-speed in more places. the others don't. we offer up to 6 hours of 4g wireless network backup. everyone else, no way. we let calls from any of your devices come from your business number. them, not so much. we let you keep an eye on your business from anywhere. the others? nope! get internet on our gig-speed network

and add voice and tv for $34.90 more per month. call or go on line today. and now for my question of the week. what nation just became only the second in the world to set up a legal market for recreational marijuana? canada, colombia, the netherlands or sweden. stay tuned and i'll tell you the correct answer. my book of the week is "american immigration: a very short introduction" by david gerber. it took a scholar to write this balanced primer on a controversial topic. he succeeds admirably, highlighting the contributions of immigration to america, but also noting the downsides which are also focused on illegal immigration. amidst all the noise on this

topic, if you want clarity, read this very short book. now for the last look. welcome to corruption park in kiev. come on in, have a blast and learn about corruption in the process. this, you'll notice, is a golden dome, a tongue-in-cheek reference to a solid gold loaf of bread left by victor who fled kiev in 2015. after he was overthrown, his people discovered he had lived in a lavishly decorated palace, now a museum complete with a private zoo and a vintage car collection. and he wasn't the only one with scars. this bmw cost $300,000 examiand belonged to a corrupt official. also is an explainer, breaking down how much gas was caused by normal ukranians.

it continues to cost the country and the world big money. i and others have put estimates at 2% gdp. bribery alone shaves about 2% off gdp growth. with so much at stake, we're hoping we see exhibit like corruption park pop up all over the world, including the united states. viewers should feel free to tweet or e-mail us and tell us what they would like to see at the exhibits. the answer to my gps challenge question this week is a. canadian prime minister justin trudeau fulfilled one of his campaign promises by legalizing the consumption of marijuana for personal use as well as a nationwide recreational market for the drug. uruguay led the world on pot, but canada was the first to canada's weed market is

expected to grow to $4.5 billion and generate $3 billion in taxes. legalization goes into effect october 17. thanks to all of you for being part of my program this week. i will see you next week. hello, everyone. thanks so much for joining me this sunday. i'm fredricka whitfield. we start with a kchaos unfoldint an outrage building in mexico. right now as more than 2,000 children in u.s. custody still wait to be reunited with their parents, protesters are gathering on the border in southern texas. they are demanding families split up to be more immediately brought back together. >> the people throughout the country, people of every different