Skip to main content

tv   Cuomo Primetime  CNN  July 25, 2018 10:00pm-11:00pm PDT

10:00 pm
you can watch full circle weeknights at 6:25 p.m. eastern at facebook.com/andersoncooper full circle. i know it just flows off the tongue. facebook.com/anderson cooper full circle. follow that page to get posts from the show. i'll see through tomorrow at 6:25 p.m. eastern. at 8:00 p.m. of course here right here on cnn. the news continues. i want to hand it over to chris. "cuomo prime time" starts now. chris? >> more you. i love it. can't get enough. thank you, my friend. all right, everybody. i'm chris cuomo. welcome to "prime time." we brought you the secret trump-cohen tape last night, and now there is a debate raging about who said what and why. teams cohen and trump disagree on a key part. partisans are of course doing what they do worst. just taking sides. so let's do something better. all right? let's get as close as we can. let's get up. come on, always take a picture of me, never just my chest. let's try and get as close to the truth as we can here. this is what we did for you.
10:01 pm
we enlisted a top forensic expert to do what happens in court cases that hang on audiotapes all the time. sweeten the audio as they call it, they improve it to try to make sense out of it. his name is ed primeau. he's coming to us from his house where he actually does this work. good to see you, ed. he's testified as an expert witness in hundreds of cases. he uses all kinds of digital tools to filter out noise. and he's been poring through every millisecond of the tape all day. he is confident that he knows what the president was saying and what michael cohen was saying. we're going to bring him in, of course. but first i want to play some of the audio as it was and how he enhanced it for us. let's start with the original. okay? this is the original recording we played for you last night. the relevant part. >> i need to open up a company
10:02 pm
for the transfer of all of that info regarding our friend david, you know, so that -- i'm going to do that right away. i've actually come up and i've spoken -- >> give it know and -- >> and i've spoken to allen weisselberg about how to set the whole thing up with -- >> so what do we have to pay for this? >> funding. yes. it's all the stuff. >> i was thinking about that. >> because you never know where that company -- >> maybe he gets hit by a truck. >> correct. so i'm all over that. and i spoke to allen about it. when it comes time for the financing, which will be -- >> wait a sec, what financing? >> we'll have to pay him something. >> pay with cash. >> no, no, no, no. >> check. >> how are you? >> we're going to ask primeau about what his read is on that. but the part you heard at the end, that's the most disputed part of the tape. trump's lawyer rudy giuliani, part of the team, says it was cohen, reportedly he said that cohen wanted this to be a cash deal for a potential payment to the "national enquirer's" parent
10:03 pm
company to keep karen mcdougal's story from going public. now he says his position is simply that trump wanted the deal done right. now, cohen's lawyer says it was the president who suggested to pay in cash. now, why does that matter? cash could indicate an intention to hide the transaction. but it could also not mean that. and we're going to deal with what it could matter and why. but first let's deal with what is. all right? we're going run that portion of this one more time. let's just run it again. this is the important part. okay? >> wait a sec. what financing? >> well, i'll have to pay him something -- >> pay with cash. >> no, no, no. >> check. >> how are you? >> and in the end is the -- who the new call. said what? this is the enhanced version. okay? >> what financing? >> i'll have to pay him something -- >> pay with cash. >> no, no, no, i got -- no. >> hey, how are you? >> i'm going to play it for you
10:04 pm
again. what do you hear the president say? >> what financing? >> well, i'll have to pay him something. >> pay with cash -- >> no, no, no. i got -- >> check. >> hey, don, how are you? >> did you hear the president say we'll pay with cash or did you hear him say do not pay with cash? does it matter? yes. but we'll get into that later. first let's bring in expert ed primeau. ed, thank you very much for working on in the way you have. i know you had to drop things to get to this. so thank you. let the audience know, how long have you been doing this? >> you're welcome, chris. this is my 34th year as of may this year. 2018. >> okay. 34 years in the business. how certain are you about what you believe you hear on this tape? >> i'm fairly confident, chris. sound perception, we all have different abilities of hearing sound and hearing speech the way we perceive it. i was in the room all day today.
10:05 pm
i enhanced the recording. i listened to the words and i typed them as i heard them. i didn't know anything about this story prior to starting. so remaining unbiased was a key into the work that i did. and i stand behind what i've transcribed and presented tonight for your show. >> okay. we have you on record saying that. what do you think trump says about cash? >> i'm hearing the words "so we'll pay with cash" or "so i'll pay with cash." and then cohen comes back with the "no, no, no" right after that. >> all right. so that's how you believe that you hear it. now, a couple of quick questions here for you. what did you learn from the metadata of the clip? data in the file and how it was saved. >> well, the clip is incomplete. we've got the beginning, i believe, because i can see a
10:06 pm
start signature at the beginning of this recording. in other words, when the recorder was engaged. and where the dialogue just abruptly ends and some new conversation comes in, there is a but splicer, an edit there. those two pieces are cut together there. and i can clearly see that and i'm certain any other forensic expert with the same qualifications would agree with me. >> what does mean to the -- >> what i saw -- that means this is not an original, it's not a master, and it is not a complete recording. >> it means that their conversation may well have continued beyond that abrupt ending and that other call that comes in. >> that's a high degree of probability that that's the case, chris. >> and i think that matches common sense as well. it seems like they're having a conversation and then something happened to the recording. what it is, we don't know and we can't tell from this. it seems to end on the word "check."
10:07 pm
now, another question for you. that answers it. the abrupt end, you subscribe of the fact of how it was edited because this isn't an original and it was clipped at the end. we don't know what that means in terms of content. but in terms of orchestration of putting it together it's something people should know. something interesting about you they should know. you have not been following the news about the tape and who said what and why. is that true? >> that's true. i was not in front of a tv. as a matter of fact, i've had a lot of family activity going on in the last week, and i don't think i've had the television on in over a week now. >> that is relevant because your ears weren't biased in terms of what you've been told you should be hearing. >> that's correct. >> that's interesting. in terms of what they call in your business a clean palette. you came in without any preconceived notions. now, i want to play it again for the audience. just the cash part. here's the enhanced version of what primeau provided us.
10:08 pm
>> what financing? >> well, i'll have to pay him something. >> pay with cash -- >> no, no, no. i got -- check. >> you hear the president saying i'll pay cash. and cohen says no, no, no. and then the word check. what the other side says. this is what primeau says. you see it on your screen right now. this is how he believes he recognizes the sound. rudy giuliani, i told him what your findings were, and he had a response. and i want to put that up for the audience, please. we had it written up in the interest of fairness. "dueling experts can come to different conclusions. in context, using cash would make no sense because the transaction is between corporations." now, i want to remind you of the transcript as they believe it. put that up for the audience. i will get that and we will put it up for you because the key part is they believe the trump -- the president says do not pay
10:09 pm
with cash. now, let's be fair. rudy's right. dueling experts -- i've been in so many cases and so have you where experts come to different conclusions and the jury has to avail themselves of a lot of argument about context and what makes sense. is it fair to argue in this case that someone equally qualified to you, mr. primeau, could hear it and say eh, could be, do not pay with cash. >> it's fair to say that, chris. and if you consider the fact that there's two people talking, they're different proximities away from the recorder. when i listened to this key part of conversation, i can hear the words consistently which i believe president trump is saying at a certain distance. so it's the same level. it's the same amplitude. when you hear cohen speak, he's a little bit louder and he's more dominant with the conversation. i used a key tool, an izotope
10:10 pm
rx6 called dialogue isolate to help me separate those voices and to analyze them. and that's what i base my opinion on, is that analysis. >> what do you think that people should take away from this tape? what matters to you most about it? >> i think what matters to me most is it's incomplete. so we've got the end of a piece of conversation and now i understand why it's important. and i'm very curious what the rest of this tape might have because we seem to hear -- i'm interpreting it as a ck. i'm not hearing the whole world check although it could be as fast as they're talking could be the word check. >> and both sides stipulate to that. it's unusual that the sides agree to much in this. but they both stipulate that the word "check" was said. so we'll give them that at their reckoning because neither gets benefit from that construction of it. you also believe you heard the president on this tape say 150 grand, that he knew how much money was being considered before cohen ever said anything
10:11 pm
to him about that amount of money. that will be relevant to people because you can't really hear it clearly on the tape. you clean it up for us. and that goes to what he knew and when. so ed primeau, thank you for spending the time. i appreciate your efforts. it is helpful to us. >> it's my pleasure, chris. >> a few things for you to take away from this. i'm a lawyer. i talk like a lawyer. he's been in trials. this is not a verdict. there is no case closed here. even at trial i cannot tell you how often something that may sound very clear to you doesn't to the ears of different jurors and it gets complicated. you heard the opinion of an expert as our guest. we always want you -- in fact, on this show we depend on you drawing your own conclusions. now, let me tee up the main question. does this matter to investigators? should this matter to you for political determinations? yes. and we will argue why. in the past 24 hours we've been
10:12 pm
able to isolate what should matter in all of this, and i'm going to lay it out for you next. welcome to holiday inn! thank you! ♪ ♪ wait, i have something for you! every stay is a special stay at holiday inn. save up to 15% when you book early at hollidayinn.com
10:13 pm
save up to 15% when you book early but i am a simple farmer.bas! my life is here... [telephone ring] ahoy-hoy. alexander graham bell here... no, no, my number is one, you must want two! two, i say!! like my father before... [telephone ring] like my father before... ahoy-hoy! as long as people talk too loudly on the phone, you can count on geico saving folks money. fifteen minutes could save you fifteen percent or more on car insurance. so chances are, you've seen us around the house. or... around the yard.
10:14 pm
on the shelf... or even... out in the field. your mom knew she could always count on us... and your grandma did too. because for over 150 years, we've been right by your side. advancing the health of the people, plants and pets you love. so, from all of us at bayer... thank you for trusting in us. then... and now.
10:15 pm
all right. now that we've had a chance to have an audio expert enhance the sound, now you have a better sense i think it's fair to say about who said what. now we get into the why and what it could mean. let's start with michael cohen. he could be in trouble. why? because the taping is illegal? no. not in new york. you've got to check the state where you are. this is a one party consent state, which means the other person doesn't have to know. is it because it's illegal to tape a client? no. unethical, grounds for disbarment? possible but unclear. why? the rules changed in 2001 about what is allowed ethically by the bar. you're going to have to do a case-by-case analysis. the biggest blow is not legality. it's credibility. this looks bad. and cohen's sell is that he was doing things for trump that he
10:16 pm
now says he wanted protection from. but you will immediately arrive at a question. then why did you do them in the first place? all right. let's get to trump. "the new york times," that reference about unsealing documents related to trump's divorce from his first wife, ivana. i want you to pay close attention to trump's response. part one. play. >> so we got served from the "new york times," i told you, to unseal the divorce papers with ivana. we're fighting it. kasowitz is going to -- >> they should never be able to get that. >> never. kasowitz says -- >> get me a coke, please. >> a woman that doesn't -- >> it's been going -- >> for two, three weeks. >> all you've got to do is delay for -- >> even after that it's not going to be opened. >> it's much more comprehensible now. one side note. get me a coke.
10:17 pm
that's the meme that's blowing up the internet with all of the impact and import in this tape. ah, twitter. what did we hear in there? the president said, "all you have to do is delay it for" dot, dot, dot. cohen interjects. "even after that it's not going to be open." by the way, they were making a sound legal argument. there wasn't a strong case for opening up those divorce papers and it didn't happen. but the relevance to you is this. state of mind. this is two months before the election. and then candidate trump was clearly thinking about how to keep things quiet to make it through to the election. why is that relevant? because of where it takes us. one of the most important parts of the tape, where we hear about the company that cohen discussed creating to buy the rights to the mcdougal story from american media. let's listen to that. part two. >> i need to open up a company for the transfer of all of that info regarding our friend david,
10:18 pm
you know, so that -- i'm going to do that right away. i've actually come up and spoken -- >> give it know and -- are. >> i've spoken to allen weisselberg about how to set the whole thing up with -- >> so what are we going to pay? 150? >> some names in there. david. who's that? we believe it's a reference to the ami boss david pecker, american media, that is the owner of the "national enquirer," the parent company. first of all, hold the prompter. no allegation or suggestion that pecker did anything wrong. okay? sometimes people get? some stink on them from being part of this conversation. that is not a point of proof for us on this show. but we do believe that's who they're talking about. and for every reason of common sense and fact that is who they were talking about. all right? now, the second name is allen weisselberg. he is the cfo of the trump organization. why does his name matter? well, cohen said it. and in the context it implied that trump's company could have been involved in cohen's hush money efforts. we don't know for sure. but it seems like he was talking to him about it.
10:19 pm
the legalities. it would be all about money movements on one level. and we know of no transaction that ever actually happened. they're talking about doing it, but we don't believe it was done. the company was set up. and then it was closed down and another one was set up. and that second one was done for stormy daniels. that was a different corporation. but it was set up with the same kind of dynamic, which is why we care about this dynamic because it sheds light on what could be a pattern. now there's something that's not getting a lot of notice. if this were just about mcdougal, why did cohen say "all the stuff from a.m.i." listen to this. >> what are we going to pay? >> funding -- yes. and it's all the stuff -- >> i was thinking about that. >> all the stuff. because here you never know where that company -- you never know what he's -- >> maybe he gets hit by a truck. >> correct. >> maybe he gets hit by a truck. that's trump speculating about why they have to be careful to secure what they want.
10:20 pm
and what is that? is it just mcdougal? i don't think so. why? because he keeps referring to it in the plural which raises a question. is there a trove of stuff that had been accumulated to insulate trump which they wanted and which theoretically is still out there? now, another important part of this audio is when trump says so what do we got to pay for this? 150? that's a reference to $150,000 that a.m.i. paid mcdougal for her story. a fact that trump appears to remember without prompting. he says the number. cohen doesn't say it. so if that's true, and it is, how is it that just before election day, after this recording, two months, when the secret deal by the "national enquirer" to buy the silence of mcdougal was uncovered, trump's campaign said this.
10:21 pm
"all aspects of this story are totally untrue. we have no knowledge of any of this." that's what hope hicks said at the time. now, that is inconsistent with what we just heard, and it is important for you to know. today the president refused to answer cnn's repeated questions about our exclusive audio. they then disinvited the reporter who was asking the questions from the next event. they can do that. but it does not make the questions go away. and we're going to take them up in our great debate next. hello. what about him? let's do it. ♪
10:22 pm
come on. this summer, add a new member to the family. at the mercedes-benz summer event. lease the glc300 for $429 a month at your local mercedes-benz dealer. mercedes-benz. the best or nothing. it's these new fresh-fx car air fresheners from armor all. each scent can create a different mood in my car. like tranquil skies. armor all, it's easy to smell good. man: are unpredictable crohn's symptoms
10:23 pm
following you everywhere? it's time to take back control with stelara®. for adults with moderately to severely active crohn's disease, stelara® works differently. studies showed relief and remission with dosing every 8 weeks. woman: stelara® may lower the ability of your immune system to fight infections and may increase your risk of infections and cancer. some serious infections require hospitalization. before treatment, get tested for tuberculosis. before or during treatment, always tell your doctor if you think you have an infection or have flu-like symptoms or sores, have had cancer, or develop any new skin growths, or if anyone in your house needs or recently had a vaccine. alert your doctor of new or worsening problems, including headaches, seizures, confusion and vision problems. these may be signs of a rare, potentially fatal brain condition. some serious allergic reactions can occur. do not take stelara® if you are allergic to any of its ingredients. man: are you fed up with crohn's symptoms following you? talk to your doctor today, and learn how janssen can help you explore cost support options. remission can start with stelara®.
10:24 pm
well, esurance makes finding the right coverage easy. in fact, drivers who switched from geico to esurance saved an average of $412. that's auto and home insurance for the modern world. esurance. an allstate company. click or call. esurance. an allstate company. where we're making the next generation of multiscreen welcadvertising possible.ght, we have the broad and targeted reach you need to access the customers you're looking for on tv and digital platforms. then we connect you to our team of media experts, who are ready to help you maximize your budget while elevating your advertising effectiveness. sounds like an advertising opportunity knocking. visit comcastspotlight.com today. visit comcastspotlight.com today. i'm a small business, but i have...
10:25 pm
big dreams... and big plans. so how do i make the efforts of 8 employees... feel like 50? how can i share new plans virtually? how can i download an e-file? virtual tours? zip-file? really big files? in seconds, not minutes... just like that. like everything... the answer is simple. i'll do what i've always done... dream more, dream faster, and above all... now, i'll dream gig. now more businesses, in more places, can afford to dream gig. comcast, building america's largest gig-speed network. what does the tape prove? that's a matter of debate. reasonably you could say it proves that cohen could not be trusted by trump. but you can also say that now there's a legitimate question about whether or not you can trust the president when it comes to telling the truth. is it okay that he was coordinating this type of payment as is clear from the tape? let's bring in great debaters
10:26 pm
ana navarro and steve cortez. good to see you both. let's start with some sound. here is rudy giuliani making his case of what this means for the president. and that will be butted up to actual dialogue between trump and cohen on the same point. >> i agree with you the tape is a little hard to hear, but i assure you that we listened to it numerous, numerous times. and the transcript makes it quite clear at the end that president trump says, quote, "don't pay with cash." >> what financing? >> we'll have to pay -- >> no. pay with cash. >> we'll have to -- >> pay with cash. >> ana navarro, what do you hear, and why does it matter? >> chris, this reminded me so much of that debate earlier this year about yanni or laurel. do you hear yanni or do you hear laurel? some people definitely heard yanni. some people definitely heard laurel.
10:27 pm
look, if you are a defender of donald trump, you hear what you want to hear. if you are an opponent of donald trump you clearly hear that he wants to pay cash to bury the story of this playmate. and you put the pieces together. in and of itself this tape doesn't prove anything except to prove that there are other tapes. this is just one piece in the very large puzzle that bob mueller is putting together. look, michael cohen, if he recorded one tape, you better believe this is like cockroaches, man. where there is one there is more. >> oh, believe me, i'm well aware -- it's about the relevant of each one. let's start with this one. steve cortes, let me bump up ana's vig on this. this tape does prove pretty reasonably that the president wasn't hearing about these efforts to get around the karen mcdougal payment for the first time. he knows the dollar amount involved. he's familiar with the construction. he's familiar with what cohen is
10:28 pm
going to do. he has an opinion about how to do it. these are all elements we were told by his campaign and by the white house he knew nothing about. >> from what we heard of that tape, and by the way, that's a carefully edited part, it seems like it. it does. >> what do you mean carefully edited? >> by the way, i agree with ana. how do we know? we don't know what preceded -- >> he didn't say what are you talking about, what corporation. why am i doing this? >> i'd like to hear all of it. but here's the thing. i agree with ana. to me when i hear it with my ears it sounds like the president is talking about cash. by the way, talking about cash, it always reminds me, you and i, chris, are roughly the same age. i just think of the wu-tang clan and cash rules everything about me. that came out when i was in college. >> strong reference. steve cortes with wu-tang. >> i never thought i'd be talking about it in presidential politics. listen, here's my point. who cares? how does it matter?
10:29 pm
if they talked -- if that's correct, if the president mentioned, the then president-elect -- or excuse me, candidate mentioned cash and it seems to me he did, so what? what does that change? >> the change is one he didn't know anything about this. yes, he did know about it. and it shows he was all in favor of figuring out how to keep this stuff quiet. and that's a -- hold on, steve. ana, what's your point? hold on, let's see what ana says. >> is there actually anybody in america who believes or believed that donald trump did not know about this? look, there's such a thing as people who don't want to believe the truth. but really if you look at yourself in the mirror, you know the guy lied. you know he's a liar. he is a pathological liar. there is no room in newspapers to print all the lies that he says on a daily basis. so is it a surprise to anybody
10:30 pm
that he lied about an affair with a "playboy" bunny after his wife had just given birth? color me shocked. this is my face of shock that donald trump lied. which is why it doesn't have that much of a political significance. now, could it have a legal significance? hell yes. just ask john edwards. but it depends what else there is. >> there was no transaction, ana. and that's going to be a big hole in the potential illegality argument. they never bought the assets back as far as we know. so it's hard to say this was a campaign finance violation -- >> this time. >> -- on this one. stormy daniels could be something else. steve cortes, you were making a little best a gas face there when ana said everybody thinks he lied. you don't think he lied about karen mcdougal? >> no. look -- >> then you believe that he didn't know anything about it until after it happened? >> hold on. >> because that's what -- >> i don't care. >> i don't care. >> that's a different question. >> i really don't.
10:31 pm
i think it's totally irrelevant. and the american people think it's -- >> truth is irrelevant? >> nobody voted -- no, hold on. nobody voted for donald trump believing that they were voting for a saint. believing they were voting for john the baptist, believing that in the 1980s -- >> that's the bar? john the baptist, saint, or all this crap we're hearing about? >> nobody believed that and -- >> they also didn't think they were voting for hugh hefner. >> no laws were broken. and by the way, here's the thing too. here's the flip side of that too. and here's where it becomes really moral is this man has done nothing but project -- protect religious liberty for america in both laws and supreme court nominees. he has actually been the best friend to christian america that he could possibly be and that's why -- >> because he has to -- >> they're willing to forget past sins and they're not relevant to why they voted for him. for you, honestly, chris, to drudge up cohen, who is a reprehensible character, who's somebody who taped a lot of people, at least according to
10:32 pm
the "wall street journal," including you, surreptitiously, this is a man who really operated like a snake in many ways including versus the president. and for us to make a big deal about his actions and to really reveal to the world what was already known, i think, again, any reasonable person -- >> well, let's unpack that real quick as a final point here. i take your point. but -- >> i think that's completely true. the reason a lot of the christian right is willing to call this a mulligan and look the other way when they weren't willing to do the same for a bill clinton is because of a gorsuch, because of a kavanaugh, because donald trump is shutting down the rights of lgbtq, because he doesn't support or does not recognize pride month, buzz he sides with the -- >> what has he done to lgbtq, by the way? >> all those things make those people happy. oh, come on. what has he done to lgbtq? first thing his administration did was curtail the rights of transgender students in public
10:33 pm
schools. he doesn't even recognize pride month. something that practically every administration has done for years since before trump. and you know why he has to do it? because he's on very thin ice. number one, buys full of flaws and full of sins. yeah, nobody thought we were voting for john the baptist. but did you think you were going to vote for hugh hefner? but also because he knows he's a hypocrite. he's playing evangelical right. he's playing republican. >> no, he's not. >> he has a -- >> he's delivering on -- >> he's delivering on what they want. >> tariffs? tariffs? slobbering to putin? >> no, no, no. the promise to get rid of roe v. wade. the promise to do those value culture war issues they care about. but steve cortes, know this. there's a big difference between giving them the policy positions they want and delivering what they used to say they needed, which was a man of character, a woman of character, and they used to define it differently than they do today.
10:34 pm
steve cortes, ana navarro, thank you both. appreciate the debate. all right. we have breaking news tonight. republicans are moving to impeach deputy attorney general rod rosenstein. what does this mean to the russia investigation? senator tim kaine weighs in next. ♪ if you have moderate to severe plaque psoriasis, little things can be a big deal. that's why there's otezla. otezla is not an injection or a cream. it's a pill that treats psoriasis differently. with otezla, 75% clearer skin is achievable after just 4 months, ... with reduced redness, thickness, and scaliness of plaques. and the otezla prescribing information has no requirement for routine lab monitoring. don't use if you're allergic to otezla. otezla may cause severe diarrhea, nausea, or vomiting. tell your doctor if these occur. otezla is associated with an increased risk of depression. tell your doctor if you have a history of depression or suicidal thoughts,
10:35 pm
or if these feelings develop. some people taking otezla reported weight loss. your doctor should monitor your weight and may stop treatment. other side effects include upper respiratory tract infection and headache. tell your doctor about all the medicines you take and if you're pregnant or planning to be. ♪ otezla. show more of you. sharper vision, without limits. days that go from sun up to sun down.
10:36 pm
a whole world in all its beauty. three innovative technologies for our ultimate in vision, clarity, and protection. together in a single lens. essilor ultimate lens package. purchase the essilor ultimate lens package and get a second pair of qualifying lenses free. essilor. better sight. better life. -we're in a small room. what?! -welcome. -[ gasps ] a bigger room?! -how many of you use car insurance? -oh. -well, what if i showed you this? -[ laughing ] ho-ho-ho! -wow. -it's a computer. -we compare rates to help you get the price and coverage that's right for you. -that's amazing! the only thing that would make this better is if my mom were here. what?! an unexpected ending!
10:37 pm
10:38 pm
all right. so what does this secret cohen tape tell us about president trump? how real is tonight's gop move to impeach rod rosenstein? and did the secretary of state allay concerns on capitol hill today? it's a lot to handle. but guess what, democratic senator from virginia tim kaine is in the center of all of it. so let's get after it. >> senator tim kaine, welcome to "prime time." >> chris, good to be with you. thanks. >> let me get your take on breaking news. articles of impeachment against acting deputy attorney general, or deputy attorney general rode rosenstein. we got a headline here from congressman meadows. congressman jordan. and nine co-sponsors. articles of impeachment against rosenstein because he has not
10:39 pm
been serious about accountability and transparency. your reaction. >> this is a concerted effort by folks to attack those who are investigating the president. it's -- you know, chris, i lived in honduras, a military dictatorship, 40 years ago. and the regime wants to go after their critics. and that's what these guys are doing. we've got to protect rosenstein, protect mueller, protect the investigation, and this strongarm tactic is going to be seen by americans for what it is, a desperate white house getting their quislings up here in congress to get their work for them. >> first on the merits, do you believe there is no case to be made against rosenstein for thwarting efforts to get disclosure on different investigations to congress? >> absolutely none. he has been very forthcoming and very scrupulous and fair. and the only reason the house guys are going after him is because they're trying to help
10:40 pm
the president cover up whatever it is 9 president's trying to cover up. >> until we get more, let's leave it there. thank you for your comment. now, the secret tape of president trump made by his former attorney michael cohen, i'm sure you're aware of it by now. is there anything in it that is news to you? >> well, look, i'm not that interested in the president's personal life. but i will say the thing about the tape that is the most important is it suggests real questions about the president's truthfulness. his team said right before the election in november, late october 2016, that he knew nothing about these allegations or about an attempt to try to cut a deal and get hush money and quiet a story bay relationship he'd had. this tape shows that he knew a lot. and the only reason you wouldn't remember that is if you'd had a lot of conversations like that. most people would remember a conversation about hush money with somebody who is claiming they had had an illicit
10:41 pm
relationship. so that tape i think is very, very damning. and it points out real problems with the president's truthfulness. and of course, chris, that would extend to many other issues. >> is it still damning even though there was never ultimately any transaction, none of these assets as they were being called, the stuff as michael cohen says on the stuff, was ever purchased from american media as far as we know? >> if it's the case that there was never any transaction, you know, that would close off one really important inquiry, which is there's some kind of a federal election campaign violation. but it still goes to the president's truthfulness. he and his team claimed before the election in 2016 that they knew nothing about this. oh, no, this president was deeply involved in very detailed discussions about what should be done. so on the truthfulness question it still raises major, major problems with the president's
10:42 pm
account of these events. >> in terms of truthfulness let's turn to the secretary of state. big news today. big hearing. he took a lot of heat from senators. were you satisfied with what secretary of state pompeo said? >> no. and on the truthfulness side, look, he may have been truthful and really not known anything, but bottom line, here's what we learned in the testimony today. the administration had sent no one to brief anyone in congress about the singapore discussion with kim jong un, which was now nearly two months ago. what we learned today from secretary of state pompeo is that there is zero evidence to suggest that north korea has made any commitments to denuclearization. move to helsinki. he was asked repeatedly. he really couldn't explain or wouldn't explain what president trump and putin talked about. but here's, chris, what really worries me.
10:43 pm
at helsinki he stood up and took putin's point of view over our intelligence community. he suggested he might dangle handing over a u.s. ambassador, ambassador mcfaul, suggesting that he could take russia's position over our diplomatic community. but now let's talk about our military. pompeo acknowledged today that the head of the joint chiefs of staff, general dunford, had not even been briefed about what happened in helsinki a week after that discussion, while the russian press and defense ministry have been reporting that military deals were made. the head of our american joint chiefs of staff wasn't even aware what had been discussed. >> but you know what? we'll leave it there. the conversation you guys need to have is with the president. he's the only one who knows his own head. >> absolutely. >> not the secretary of state. and i'm sure you can get the access. senator tim kaine, welcome to "prime time," and thank you. >> good to be back with you, chris. thanks. >> that's not some throwaway line to the senator.
10:44 pm
they should go and deal with the president. enough with the walls. enough with the partisan bickering. go and talk to the man. he's our president. ask him where his head is. talk to him. engage. find ways to do things for you. so now that we have this new form of political expression, which is if you don't like somebody prosecute them, we're going to debate this gop offensive against rod rosenstein. a far superior legal mind to my own, republican state attorney general, former, ken cuccinelli is here. cuomo's court will be in session. man 1: this is my body of proof. woman 1: proof of less joint pain... woman 2: ...and clearer skin. woman 3: this is my body of proof. man 2: proof that i can fight psoriatic arthritis... woman 4: ...with humira. woman 5: humira targets and blocks a specific source of inflammation that contributes to both joint and skin symptoms. it's proven to help relieve pain, stop further irreversible joint damage,
10:45 pm
and clear skin in many adults. humira is the #1 prescribed biologic for psoriatic arthritis. avo: humira can lower your ability to fight infections, including tuberculosis. serious, sometimes fatal infections and cancers, including lymphoma, have happened; as have blood, liver, and nervous system problems, serious allergic reactions, and new or worsening heart failure. before treatment, get tested for tb. tell your doctor if you've been to areas where certain fungal infections are common, and if you've had tb, hepatitis b, are prone to infections, or have flu-like symptoms or sores. don't start humira if you have an infection. woman 6: need more proof? woman 7: ask your rheumatologist about humira. man 1: what's your body of proof? at crowne plaza, we know business travel isn't just business. there's this. a bit of this. why not? your hotel should make it easy to do all the things you do. which is what we do. crowne plaza. we're all business, mostly.
10:46 pm
crowne plaza. we have a question about your brokerage fees. fees? what did you have in mind? i don't know. $4.95 per trade? uhhh and i was wondering if your brokerage offers some sort of guarantee? guarantee? where we can get our fees and commissions back if we're not happy. so can you offer me what schwab is offering? what's with all the questions? ask your broker if they're offering $4.95 online equity trades and a satisfaction guarantee. if you don't like their answer, ask again at schwab. chicken! that's right, chicken?! candace-- new chicken creations from starkist. buffalo style chicken in a pouch--
10:47 pm
bold choice, charlie! just tear, eat... mmmmm. and go! try all of my chicken creations! chicken!
10:48 pm
simple proposition. impeach rosenstein, yes or no? cuomo versus cuccinelli, former a.g. of virginia. here's my position on it. it's a non-starter. not because of the merits of the case but because you don't prosecute your political enemies and that's what this is. >> well, i don't agree with that, chris. or in cuomo's court judge chris. but the real impetus for this i think is that they don't have any other options. and as you implicitly noted there, this is not actually a
10:49 pm
prosecution. impeachment is different. it hasn't been used much. and frankly, it's fallen into disuse. i don't think it's been used enough. and here when the house cannot get materials, for instance, they can't get their subpoenas responded to -- >> they have gotten a ton of materials. they haven't gotten everything they want. continue. >> i agree with you. i agree with you. but they've been wrestling for some of this for a long time. and even paul ryan, you know, not with respect to impeachment but with respect to the fact that they've been stonewalled, has sided with his fellow house members -- >> it's not a new beef with the doj, ken cuccinelli. >> let me finish one point. >> go ahead. i'm just trying to check it along the way. please. >> the house has to go to the department of justice to enforce its subpoenas. well, that's just not tenable here. and we saw this under the obama administration. same problem, different administration. >> right. but we didn't impeach there. >> if you're the house you literally only -- that's true.
10:50 pm
i actually think it's a more sincere undertaking when it's within the same party. this is the house standing up for itself institutionally. they don't have any other options. >> that's false. they of course have different options. they have an option not to do this. to take the information they have. just because rosenstein is supposedly a republican. times have changed. the republican party isn't what it was anymore. you have trump and everybody else. rosenstein is in the everybody else category. even in the same party. it's a dangerous
10:51 pm
i take the other side from you, i think they should not do it at all. >> well, let's go back to an easier example. loise learner. why wasn't she impeached? i think the founders envision this being used a whole lot more than about the 15 or 20 times it's been used in the entire history. >> in this current climate if we're allowed to have this and this is going to be a prosecution. they're going to go into the committee -- unless he marks it -- >> it's going to be a trial. it's going to be ugly and then it's going to go to the senate and die. i don't think it gets us anywhere. it's a fruitless, extra layer on top of the a process that everybody says is unnecessary. why keep adding more legal process to a legal process that you don't any is necessary? >> i think they are looking for ways to actually take action. you declare that doing nothing is doing something. >> litigate the subpoenas. >> the people who litigate that on behalf of the house are the
10:52 pm
department of justice. that's who handles those. that's the ordinary course when there is -- >> you could go outside that. there's other options. we're too comfortable prosecuting our enemies right now. it's not good for either side or you or me. we have to leave it there. you're a better arguer than i am. i'll give it to you. thank you for doing it with me tonight. >> my pleasure. i have some final thoughts for you tonight on the trump-cohen tape. advice i think is helpful to all of us. we're being tested about what basis we should use to believe things. next. what will you discover with a lens made by essilor? sharper vision, without limits. days that go from sun up to sun down. a whole world in all its beauty. three innovative technologies for our ultimate in vision,
10:53 pm
clarity, and protection. together in a single lens. essilor ultimate lens package. purchase the essilor ultimate lens package and get a second pair of qualifying lenses free. essilor. better sight. better life. gathered here are the world's finest insurance experts. rodney -- mastermind of discounts like safe driver, paperless. the list goes on. how about a discount for long lists? gold. mara, you save our customers hundreds for switching almost effortlessly. it's a gift. and jamie. -present. -together we are unstoppable. so, what are we gonna do? ♪ insurance. that's kind of what we do here.
10:54 pm
man: are unpredictable crohn's symptoms following you everywhere? it's time to take back control with stelara®. for adults with moderately to severely active crohn's disease, stelara® works differently. studies showed relief and remission with dosing every 8 weeks. woman: stelara® may lower the ability of your immune system to fight infections and may increase your risk of infections and cancer. some serious infections require hospitalization. before treatment, get tested for tuberculosis. before or during treatment, always tell your doctor if you think you have an infection or have flu-like symptoms or sores, have had cancer, or develop any new skin growths, or if anyone in your house needs or recently had a vaccine. alert your doctor of new or worsening problems, including headaches, seizures, confusion and vision problems. these may be signs of a rare, potentially fatal brain condition.
10:55 pm
some serious allergic reactions can occur. do not take stelara® if you are allergic to any of its ingredients. man: are you fed up with crohn's symptoms following you? talk to your doctor today, and learn how janssen can help you explore cost support options. remission can start with stelara®. cost support options. any paint can change the way a room looks. but only one can change how it feels. century, from benjamin moore, is the first-ever soft touch matte finish paint. its revolutionary texture unlocks 75 unprecedented colors,
10:56 pm
each with exquisite depth and richness. it's a difference you can see, touch, and feel. that's proudly particular. century. only at select local paint and hardware stores. century. does your business internet provider promise a lot? let's see who delivers more. comcast business gives you gig-speed in more places. the others don't. we offer up to 6 hours of 4g wireless network backup. everyone else, no way. we let calls from any of your devices come from your business number. them, not so much. we let you keep an eye on your business from anywhere. the others? nope! get internet on our gig-speed network and add voice and tv for $34.90 more per month. call or go online today. the truth is also a sign.
10:57 pm
i say it a lot. i think it's the key to finding common ground. common ground is a position of strength, not weakness. it's the first step of getting something done for you. on the issue of truth, the president said these words yesterday, "what you're seeing and what you're reading is not what's happening." he said that after days ago saying that we, journalists, are
10:58 pm
the enemy of the people. those two statements taken together are untrue and un-american. thankfully, you guys agree, largely. a new poll says that 70% of you see the media for what it is, an essential part of our democracy. does that mean we're great? of course not. you're right to criticizing the media for not covering it the way what you think matters. it's fair criticism that we can chase the president almost obsessively because he matters so much. in that consistency there can be lack of focus. the cohen-trump tape, does it matter in of course. it represents truth on an important situation. so does the good news that trump says he's backing off tariffs and make won't need to soak you for $12 billion as make good for voters. he seems to be doing the right thing with the eu. that's the truth also. both matters. everything is not equal. don't be deceived. believe your eyes and your ears. the only enemy for us is ignorance. seek information. stay open.
10:59 pm
the president, i believe, thinks that he benefits from controlling what you believe about him. that's his call. i'm not telling you what to believe. i work hard to give you a better sense of what is true and then you decide what to believe. in a time when people are closed and inconsiderate and indecent, be open. be aware. if you can do that, it will help all of us be bigger. important note, rudy giuliani, the president's lawyer will be here tomorrow night to make the case to you directly. that case will be tested. thank you for watching us. thank you for helping us get after it here on cuomo primetime. cnn tonight don lemon starts now. you have to keep perspective, chris when you're
11:00 pm
doing this. you talked about backing off of tariffs, that's good news. you have to remember if he hadn't proposed them, then he wouldn't have to back off of them. >> you have to remember, maybe if he hadn't proposed them, he wouldn't have gotten the lever age to get it into the eu guy to get him where he is now. >> maybe. we have little information about what's happening now. you also have to remember. we want the people watching us, the american people to critique us, give us feedback. we welcome it. when we get it wrong, we apologize and correct it. >> that's what you're supposed to do. >> this administration doesn't do that. >> that's a rare commodity politically here. i'm happy you are back. you had no more back. you were like, you're not really sure. you called me naive. >> it's just i think we keep

71 Views

info Stream Only

Uploaded by TV Archive on