a lot of money. in a crowded field, that gives you a real edge. >> whether she runs or not, that still becomes a major edge in terms of her ability to fund-raise for other democrats. it will wield power. >> nothing against iowa corn dogs but i'm a fenway frank guy. jim sciutto is in for wolf. he starts right now. have a great day. hello. i'm jim sciutto in for wolf blitzer. it's 1:00 p.m. in washington. wherever you're watching from, thanks for joining us. any minute now, defense attorneys will get their final chance to make ex-trump campaign chairman paul manafort a free man. prosecutors made their closing argument just a short time ago this morning. it took them some 90 minutes. and they methodically laid out their case. the prosecutor tells jurors at one point, quote, mr. manafort lied to keep more money when he had it and he lied to get more money when he didn't. this is a case about lies.

cameras are not allowed inside that alexandria, virginia, courtroom, but we've had reporters inside from start to finish detailing and dissecting every word. shimon prokupecz has been following this trial for uincluding being inside there. shan wu, former federal prosecutor turned defense attorney. he previous served as attorney for manafort's former business partner rick gates. shimon, the final word from the prosecution here, emphasizing that word lies. >> yeah. quite a number of times. and really this is what this case has been about. tax fraud, frank fraud, lies. lies on documentings. lying in e-mails, lying to accountants. >> and lying for money. >> lying for money. hiding money. not wanting to pay taxes. one of the more interesting things and probably perhaps more greater color from this closing argument was how the prosecutors treated rick gates. at one point telling the jury,

you don't need to like him. trying to deal with this issue of the fact that he had an affair. he was stealing from paul manafort. all of those, obviously, are going to be -- >> pleaded guilty to lying and also pleaded guilty for his own charges relating to it. the other thing they made a point of, it's all about documents. we've all made a big point that rick gates is the star witness here. prosecutors said, no, the star witness is the documents. look at the documents. if there's something you don't believe or something you question about rick gates, all of that is supported by the documents. so, clearly, that to them is an important part of this case. and the bank fraud is really an important part of this case. that's where paul manafort has the most exposure, where he can really face significant time. >> if you can, help us handicap this case here now. you did have the unusual circumstances where the defense did not bring any defense witnesses. closed their case. now they'll make their closing arguments. is this an open and shut case

for this jury? >> i don't think so. not at all. it's always hard to handicap. any white collar case with this amount of documents, it's an uphill battle. not that unusual for them not to put on a case. i think it shows a measure of confidence that they think they've scored some points on cross-examination. they built some credibility for themselves. they promised the jury we're going to show you gates stole which at the time was a basit oa bombshell, but they delivered on that. and he ple guilty to false statements. they've made some points on cross-examination. on bank fraud some arguments that they their may have been this notion of the quid pro quo, it doesn't mean manafort submitted false information to the bank. they've got some things to hang their hat on. >> i wonder what they're going to do here. give the jury the tax fraud and then really ham or the bank fraud. i think that's where he has the

most exposure and there is some argument to be made under the law, certainly to the jury that perhaps the prosecutor did not meet their burden of proof. the tax fraud he'll have a hard time with. >> on the bigger issue of the broader focus of the mueller investigation, russian interference in the election, it came out of the trial, reaffirmed last week when gates didn't reveal but confirmed he'd been interviewed by the special prosecutor, his team, some 20 times. that investigation still ongoing. do we have a sense of gates' importance to mueller's investigation on the russia portion of this probe? >> we know from what's come out publicly here. we can infer the fact he got a very generous plea offer here. but i think we've seen little hints that there is a lot of debriefing going on. we've seen some of the examples come out. 20 times is a lot of time to spend with prosecutors. >> and they don't waste their

time. he's cooperating. he had a lot of charges against him, gates. to get that cooperation deal with the promise it appears of just probation, not jail time, and if the prosecution says they didn't really need gates to convict manafort, does that then presume that he is cooperating on the other issues under investigation, and providing value? >> right. generally the prosecution is not going to give someone a good cooperation deal unless they feel it's valuable. i'm not speaking from anything confidential or privileged but that's just the way it goes. in the manafort trial, there's this atmospheric that it's possible there's a jury nullification issue going on where they might think, you know, he did so many wrong things and they've given him such a good deal that maybe it's not entirely fair to mr. manafort. and sometimes juries will go that route or you really only need one person to go that route. >> one person who doesn't believe it meets the standard of beyond a reasonable doubt. shan and shimon, thanks. among the mountain of

evidence in the paul mafrnafort trial is an e-mail exchange from jared kushner. manafort e-mailed kushner recommending a bank chairman for secretary of the army. at the time, that bank was providing millions of dollars in loans to manafort. the e-mail included two other recommendations for possible trump appointees. kushner responded, quote, on it. there's no indication the trump team in the end considered those suggestions or that kushner was aware at the time of those millions of dollars in loans to manafort. jim heinz of connecticut is a member of the house intelligence committee and he joins us now from stamford, connecticut. thanks for taking the time. >> good afternoon, jim. >> so that e-mail there was an example of manafort's continued influence or perceived influence with the trump administration because three months after he left as chairman he felt he had the influence at least to request a job for his banker.

how concerning is that to you? >> well, it's ugly. it's very ugly. the american people should have the confidence of knowing that their secretary of the army or their under secretary of commerce didn't get that job because he wanted to -- he was willing to extent a loan to paul manafort. that's not the way a government should work. and it just really -- talk about the swamp not being drained. it is the ultimate in influence trading. now surprise, right. no surprise. this is an administration that sort of makes a hobby of influence trading and so i'm not surprised by it, but again, it's further example of the reason why the american people have record low regard for washington, d.c. >> we're, of course, witnessing a continuing public assault by the president and his allies on the special counsel, the investigation. just a short time ago, the president's personal attorney rudy giuliani had more particularly pointed words for mueller about this probe. and i'm going to quote him here.

he told bloomberg, if he doesn't get it done in the next two or three weeks, he's speaking about mueller here, we'll just unload on him like a ton of bricks. right the damn report so we can see it and rebut it. what is he threatening here to unload on the special counsel who was appointed by a deputy attorney general appointed by this president. what is he implying there? >> well, you know, i mean, my god, so much to unpack there. first of all, the president has been unloading on bob mueller a vietnam war hero, respected by pretty much everybody, for over a year. i don't know what he means by we're going to unload. we're at the tail end of a year plus of the president and the president's people doing all they can to delegitimize bob mueller and the fbi. this has one objective. when mueller comes out with his report which i anticipate he'll do in due course, whenever he thinks that justice is served by

releasing that report, not whenever rudy yell july or donald trump want it to come out. he will come out with a report that the white house will, over the course of a year and a half, have delegitimized in the eyes of some minor ity of the americn population. the american people ought to scratch their head and say what other subject of an investigation gets to decide when the prosecutor wraps up their case? the president is not above the law and neither is his attorney. >> i wonder, the president has been perpetuating this attack on mueller for some many months. he's made a lot of veiled and not so veiled threats against the special counsel against his attorney general jeff sessions. but he hasn't pulled the trigger on -- he could fire him, jeff sessions. he could fire the deputy attorney general. we know from our own reporting he's had a lot of internal pressure not to take that step. in light of how long he's done this without actually moving, do you think this is more for public consumption and that these are, in the end, empty

threats from the president? >> yeah, look. at the end of the day, the recourse against the president is political. we have a long conversation of the legal intricacies of whether a sitting president can be indicted. the bottom line is that's never been tested and so the answer to this question of, is donald and so, therefore, if his base believes, as they do today because of his -- donald trump's throwing mud at mueller, at the fbi, at the department of justice, if he believes that the entities are corrupt and bob mishlgs mueller, despite all the evidence and many guilty pleas is somehow serving the interest of hillary clinton which is insane on the face of it given what happened prior to the november 2016 election, the president can count on a number of republicans to regardless of what happened, this is, remember, i can shoot somebody on fifth avenue president, the president can rely on republicans to defend him, regardless of the fact pattern because he has so delegitimized

bob mueller. >> there's a new poll from quinnipiac university. it says more than half of republicans now agree with the president's assertion, alarming assertion, offensive assertion that the enemy is the press of the people. just 36% said the news media had an important part of our democracy. now among democrats, very different numbers. just 5% said the media is the enemy of the people. that's more than half of people who describe themselves as republicans who say that the media is the enemy of the people. language from an authoritarian regime. how alarming should that be? >> right out of -- you know who says that kind of stuff? josef stalin said that kind of thing. dictators say that kind of thing. and sadly, and i do mean sadly. i've got lots of terrific republicans in my congressional district in connecticut. lastly it's just demonstrates the extent to which the

republican party has abandoned all its principles, whether that's fiscal responsibility, whether that's not supporting tariffs, you name it, being decent. and become really a cultive personality around donald trump. and it's a really interesting question to ask yourself. what happens to the republican party post-trump. what are my colleagues who gave up their constitutional responsibility to serve as a check and a balance on the president of the united states. how are they going to answer for that on the back end of donald trump's presidency? >> congressman jim hunt, thanks for joining us today. >> thank you, jim. well, the white house press secretary says she cannot guarantee that a tape does not exist of the u.s. president using the "n" word. we're going to discuss that next. plus, turkey now retaliating against president trump's tariffs. and still refusing to release an american pastor held there. the standoff spooking the markets today as fears of a global financial crisis, that's right, a global financial crise,

i at least fears of that, expand. in more than 300 priests accused of abusing more -- wait for this -- 1,000 young children in just one state. today, not a word yet from the pope. i'm going to speak with one survivor of that horrendous crime who says the war against the catholic hierarchy is just beginning. unlimited ways to be you. unlimited ways share with others. unlimited ways to live for the moment. all for as low as 30 bucks a line. unlimited for you. for them. for all. get unlimited for as low at 30 bucks per line for four lines at t-mobile.

oh! oh! ♪ ozempic®! ♪ (vo) people with type 2 diabetes are excited about the potential of once-weekly ozempic®. in a study with ozempic®, a majority of adults lowered their blood sugar and reached an a1c of less than seven and maintained it. oh! under seven? (vo) and you may lose weight. in the same one-year study, adults lost on average up to 12 pounds. oh! up to 12 pounds? (vo) a two-year study showed that ozempic® does not increase the risk of major cardiovascular events like heart attack, stroke, or death. oh! no increased risk? ♪ ozempic®! ♪ ozempic® should not be the first medicine for treating diabetes, or for people with type 1 diabetes or diabetic ketoacidosis.

do not share needles or pens. don't reuse needles. do not take ozempic® if you have a personal or family history of medullary thyroid cancer, multiple endocrine neoplasia syndrome type 2, or if you are allergic to ozempic®. stop taking ozempic® and get medical help right away if you get a lump or swelling in your neck, severe stomach pain, itching, rash, or trouble breathing. serious side effects may happen, including pancreatitis. tell your doctor if you have diabetic retinopathy or vision changes. taking ozempic® with a sulfonylurea or insulin may increase the risk for low blood sugar. common side effects are nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, stomach pain, and constipation. some side effects can lead to dehydration, which may worsen kidney problems. i discovered the potential with ozempic®. ♪ oh! oh! oh! ozempic®! ♪ (vo) ask your healthcare provider if ozempic® is right for you.

you may be learning about, medicare and supplemental insurance. medicare is great, but it doesn't cover everything ...only about 80% of your part b medicare costs. a medicare supplement insurance plan may help cover some of the rest. learn how an aarp medicare supplement insurance plan, insured by unitedhealthcare insurance company might be the right choice for you. a free decision guide is a great place to start. call today to request yours. so what makes an aarp medicare supplement plan unique? these are the only medicare supplement plans endorsed by aarp because they meet aarp's high standards of quality and service. you're also getting the great features that any medicare supplement plan provides. you may choose any doctor that accepts medicare patients. you can even visit a specialist. with this type of plan there are no networks or referrals needed. also, a medicare supplement plan... ...goes with you when you travel anywhere in the u.s.

call today for a free guide. welcome back. if you've been keeping track, the white house still not denying that president trump may have used the "n" word during his time on "the apprentice." is it because like you and perhaps like uthe white house isn't sure who to believe. do you trust omarosa, the reality tv villain turned white

house aide or put your faith is katrina pearson, the trump campaign staffer who signed an nda meaning if the president said that vile word, she couldn't confirm it. perhaps jake tapper summed it up on the air best. >> we honestly have a story where there are like 30 liars. >> yeah, yeah, yeah. not credible. nobody. >> nobody is credible. >> they're all changing their stories. omarosa, katrina pearson, the president. they're all changing their stories and we don't know what to believe. that's why omarosa has these tapes. >> want to bring in cnn politics reporter chris cillizza. help us keep track of this. we often say there are changing stories. that's not a new thing with this administration. but these stories have changed remarkably. >> changed remarkably and changed remarkably quickly. remember, we're dealing from monday to wednesday. let's go through it. let's start, obviously, katrina pearson and omarosa. what katrina said on fox news. that did not happen.

she's talking about the "n" word tape. it sounds like omarosa is writing a script for a movie. let's stop there. fast forward to tuesday morning when omarosa is on cbs and plays some audio of a conversation she secretly recorded between she, and pearson and another. >> i'm trying to find out the context it was used in to help us maybe figure out a way to spin it. >> i said, well, can you think of any time this has happened and he said no. >> well, that's not true. >> how do you think i should handle it? and i told him what you just said which is, well, it depends on what scenario you're talking about. and he said well, why don't you just go ahead and put it to bed. he said it. no, he said it, he's embarrassed. >> katrina pierson comes out

with a more formal statement. we never had a call confirming that frank lutz, a republican pollster directly heard president trump say this word on a tape. that doesn't mean the tape sdnc doesn't exist. they were denying frank heard donald trump. wait, there's more. katrina pierson two hours later in her secret tape recording of me it was many times i'd placate omarosa to move her along. and one more time on those same thi thing, with erin last night. the complete epitome of annoying where you have to finally give in to get on about your day. four explanations. less than 24 hours, jim, and the last explanation that katrina pierson has settled on is she lied on that recording to placate omarosa because she just wanted to move on with the

conversation. what did she lie about? the fact that donald trump likely said, in their mind, the "n" word on a tape or that it existed. that's a big thing to just say something because you want to move the conversation along. but that's where katrina pierson has landed. and that's why we just can't get to the bottom of this. so many stories. so many changing stories. back to you, jim. >> won't know unless we do find there's a tape. chris sills cillizza, thank you. sarah sanders having an opportunity to clarify remarks from yesterday when she was asked whether the president is on the tape using the "n" word. here is the response that got so much attention yesterday. >> can you stand at the podium and guarantee the american people they'll never hear donald trump utter the "n" word on a recording in any context? >> i can't guarantee anything, but i can tell you that the president addressed this

question directly. i can tell you that i've never heard it. >> just to be clear, you can't guarantee it? >> look, i haven't been in every single room. >> joining me now is julie hirschfield davis. listening to sarah sanders there. that's not the first time you see the white house spokesperson protect themselves a bit. one say, well, the president has said this. it's not me. the president has said this but also really can't rule it out because she can't rule it out. >> in a job like that, her one task is to be able to convey accurately what she knows to be the truth. and she has gotten burned time and time again on so many of these issues that have arisen for the president, whether it be stormy daniels and his involvement with her and trying to silence her. whether be it a policy issue of what was happening at the border with children and families. where she says something that later proves not to be able to be borne out. we do see her now retreating more and more into this space of, here's what i know to be

true. i really can't speak to bebeyond what i've been told. it leads to this situation you have today where you'll have to come back at this and give an answer that may be more satisfying to people who are trying to get to the bottom of what is a fairly simple question. >> it's interesting they've added this was not until now a scheduled briefing. do you read into that that the white house is going to make another shot at clarifying this? >> i guess i would assume that they would. we've gotten to the point and it's pretty unusual in the annals of white house coverage where it's not a foregone conclusion there will be a regular briefing at the white house. when there is, sometimes it's an occasion. and it's often a surprise. and i think actually that's also by design. that allows the white house to control and sort of narrow the scope of questions because people never know whether you'll get a crack at the white house to actually ask about the issues of the day, the questions the president himself may have raised with a tweet or whatever else. >> when is the last time he's done an actual full press

conference as opposed to the briefings. >> it's been more than a year except for on foreign soil. >> on correcting the record, it was a rare instance yesterday where the white house press secretary sarah sanders admitted she had made a mistake in yesterday's press briefing, this related to job figures. she had said yesterday that trump had been responsible for far more black jobs than president obama. have a listen to the claim. >> this president, since he took office in the year and a half he's been here has created 700,000 new jobs for african-americans. that's 700,000 african-americans that are working now that weren't working when this president took place. when president obama left, after eight years in office, eight years in office, he'd only created 195,000 jobs for african-americans. >> only problem with that figure is it just wasn't true. sanders admitted that later tweeting, correction from today's briefing. job numbers for president trump and president obama were

correct. but the time frame for president obama wasn't. i'm sorry for the mistake but no apologies for the 700,000 jobs for african-americans created under president trump. the economy added about 3 million african-american jobs while obama was in office. and 140,000 new jobs attributed to trump were actually added while obama was still president. did the correction actually correct the record on this? >> well, actually not. the 700,000 figure that she provided as you point out includes a couple of months under -- when president obama was still president. and the figures she was comparing it to for president obama when she said were for eight years were for the first 20 months of his presidency which included several months when george w. bush was still president and had been in the aftermath of a huge financial meltdown. so, no. she didn't actually correct the record but more notable is the fact that the trump administration actually does have a positive story to tell on this front. put aside the comparison with

president obama. when you go into the briefing with a talking point to that, to have it be that shoddy and that devoid of checking and sort of nailing down the details, which is what the counsel of economic advisers does is extraordinary. >> you want to get the stats right. >> they have a positive story to tell here but they were trying to fudge the numbers by starting it at the inauguration. >> it gives president obama a knock for something that wasn't his responsibility. >> sometimes it can be to your advantage to stick to the facts. imagine that. julie, thanks very much. coming up, a damning grand jury report on predator priests. raping, that's right, raping little boys and girls. some of them as young as 18 months old. why, quote, men of god did nothing. the shocking allegations of a coverup spanning some decades.

we'll speak with a survivor. stay with us. with two times more detail than any other dna test... you can get a new taste of your heritage. only $59- our site's lowest price ever.

i'm a small business, but i have... big dreams... and big plans. so how do i make the efforts of 8 employees... feel like 50? how can i share new plans virtually? how can i download an e-file? virtual tours? zip-file? really big files? in seconds, not minutes... just like that. like everything... the answer is simple. i'll do what i've always done... dream more, dream faster, and above all... now, i'll dream gig. now more businesses, in more places, can afford to dream gig. comcast, building america's largest gig-speed network. brace yourself for one of the most alarming stories we'll do today. from men of god to monsters. a new grand jury report out of pennsylvania says that more than 300, quote, predator priests, end quote, have been credibly accused of sexually assaulting more than 1,000 children.

1,000 children in one state. the cases are disturbing. the details horrific. not only that, the report revealed what was essentially a playbook of how the catholic church in pennsylvania protected themselves, protected those predator priests, even after they found out what they had done. jim van sickle testified before the grand jury in this case. his alleged abuser is named in the report and was charged earlier this year with abusing two boys. this between 2010 and -- 2002 and 2010. mr. van sickle, thanks for joining us. we appreciate you giving us the opportunity to talk to you about what a disturbing thing. >> thank you for having me. >> i want to ask you how you're doing and what kind of support you're getting, if any, to handle the pain that you went through. >> i can tell you that the

announcement yesterday was a huge victory for all survivors in pennsylvania, as well as the united states and across the world. i came out in february or march of this year for the first time after 36 years of silence. that event in and of itself was very healing. since then i've been reaching out through my facebook page by my name jim van sickle and hundreds and hundreds of people have reached out and i've been able to talk to victims and survivors, and that's been healing. yesterday's announcement and the work that the attorney general's office, josh shapiro, dan dye, the whole office, the work they put in uncovering the truth and allowing our truth to be sold in this report is just breathtaking. it's been so validating, so exciting. and so healing. but i do have to mention that there's a hole in my soul that

may never go away. and i realize that. and it's something i have to live with for the rest of my life. >> a hole in your soul. part of this is the abuse of trust, right? you trusted this priest. you considered him a mentor and he horribly abused that trust in abusing you. what would you want to say to him? >> i actually had the opportunity through a catholic woman who contacted me who had acce access. and basically what i told her was that i was being led by the holy spirit and jesus christ in this process and that i really just want to pray for his eternal soul. >> the sad fact, i'm sure, i was amazed when i read this and i'm sure our viewers will feel the same way. these cases, for the vast majority of them, the state statute of limitation prevents

any legal action, even documented legal action, credible legal action against these predators involved. but you and the people you're working with, you're trying to change that now. how can you do that? >> well, our next fight, which will start here in september, we're supporting representative mark rozzi and his new bill he just put forth here to change the statute of limitations and actually abolish it. the key point to the whole piece of legislation is a look back window for those people who are outside the statute of limitations. and you're right, jim. this report shows many, many, many abuses, but there's only been two convictions. my predator being one of those. >> two convictions. over a thousand children. so many others who aren't getting that justice. pope francis, the head of the catholic church, he's been more forward leaning on this issue

than his predecessors. many public comments. he's met with victims. there's been no official comment from the vatican yet on this case. are you disappointed by that? >> yeah, i am. you know, i think josh shapiro laid it out pretty clearly what needed to happen as far as the support from the bishops, the cardinals here in the u.s., as well as, obviously, pennsylvania. we're asking for them to call off their lobbyists, the insurance lobbyists, the catholic lobbyists and let us pass this bill. i think for these people and a look back window to be able to face their predator in court will be a huge step to healing. and it will also be an accountability that fits the crime that allows the church to have to purge itself and holds them accountable in a way that they will purge themselves of

this heinous action that's going on within the catholic church. >> and one challenge for cases like this, it is difficult. it's painful to come forward and recount these crimes because, as you said, it leaves a hole in your soul. what advice would you have for other survivors today? would you encourage them to come forward? >> i have. as a matter of fact, i spoke to a victim over the weekend in my hometown. very afraid to come forward. we met at night in a closed strip mall, and we just shared stories and he was able to share his story, and i was able to just basically listen to him. the next day he called and met with my family and a close friend of mine who is also a survivor. drove down from buffalo to bradford, p.a., and met with him. and today i spoke with him about

his desire to speak out, and i connected him with another network and he's going to be calling them to make a statement. and he's so excited. but he's also afraid. the thing about it, how many people are outside of this statute of limitations? being outside makes you feel like, if i do come forward, nothing is going to happen. there is nothing that's going to happen, and why subject myself to openly coming forward if there is nothing that can happen. that's why the statute of limitations in pennsylvania is ridiculous. i had two years to come forward when i was abused. i didn't even know what the statute of limitations was at the time. didn't even know they existed. my predator spent time after trying to reach out to me to kind of get me past that period of time because he knew if you got me past that period of time, the laws of pennsylvania protect

the predator and not the victim. so the anger that you may see or the emotion that you may see is a lack of healing that can't be healed. you can't even come forward and go after these predators, and it's sad, and it's frustrating. and the tears i think you saw from that stage, although they were out of extreme happiness that this report came out, there's still a little bit of a cloud there because there's nothing we can do. >> two-year statute of limitation then depends on children coming forward because they'd still be minors, i'd imagine, in many cases. >> jim van sickle, really appreciate you being brave to share your story and the work you're doing. i went through 12 years of catholic school myself and watching this is particularly disturbing. wish you the best. >> can i say one more quick thing? >> sure. of course. >> i want people to know that we're not after the religion and we're not after the faithful inside the catholic church.

we're after the predators and the people who cover them up. and i think the catholic voice can be strong here by turning to their pastors, turning to the hierarchy and speaking out with us to force change inside the catholic church. >> well said, jim. thanks very much. >> thank you. i appreciate it. >> best of luck to you. still ahead -- an american pastor at the center of another escalating standoff that's bringing down the markets around the world right now. how turkey is retaliating to president trump's tariffs. i'm captain obvious and hotels.com

rewards me basically everywhere. so why am i hosting a dental convention after party in my vegas suite? because hotels.com lets me do me. who wants to floss me? hotels.com. you do you and get rewarded.

-morning. -morning. -what do we got? -keep an eye on that branch. might get windy. have a good shift.

fire pit. last use -- 0600. i'd stay close. morning. ♪ get ready to switch. protected by flo. should say, "protected by alan and jamie." -right? -should it? when you bundle home and auto... run, alan! ...you get more than just savings. you get 'round-the-clock protection.

november 6th, less than three months away, is the day voters decide who controls the house, senate and 38 governors seats. in turn those winners help determine the future of the trump presidency. just last hour, cnn released a new poll on which party leads the race and on what issues matter the most to voters. cnn national correspondent john king is here to break it down. the so-called generic ballot numbers have been tightening but now a big lead for which party? >> the democrats, jim. big lead. look at the numbers in our brand-new poll. a double-digit lead for the democrats. 52% of registered voters want the democrats when asked who you'll vote for when it comes to congress. 41% say republicans. democrats need 23 seats net to pick up control of the house. if this stays in double digits by election day, anywhere near

double digits, democrats get to 23 and more. democrats started the year with even a bigger double-digit lead. as we get into the spring, this was essentially a dead heat. 47/44 just in may. as we get closer to the election, democrats opening this double-digit lead. 12 weeks to go. the republicans have a problem. if the election were today, numbers like that, guess what? the democrats would retake the house and then some. we also asked voters, what are you thinking about? what's moetivating your votes. first, republicans, what is extremely important to you. president trump, taxes and immigration are the top issues. not all that surprising. republicans hope to run on taxes. the campaign trail.t that way on this is how republicans look at the top issues. a little different when you ask democrats. health care and immigration. and this is interesting. immigration, we usually identify as a republican motivating

issue. because of the family separation issue, democratic anger at president trump. immigration, normally an issue that works for republicans might this election motivate the democrats. >> interesting to watch the ads in these races. a lot of democrats focusing on issues over the president. a lot of republicans focusing in on that old favorite target nancy pelosi. is that a big motivating factor for the gop base? >> our poll is very interesting on this. you can put the numbers up on the screen. as a national issue, it's not working for the republicans just yet. only 34% of republicans say nancy pelosi is extremely or very important to their vote when thinking about voting for congress. 60%. this is among republican voters. 60% say it's not that important. it's working for us in ohio or in montana. this is a national poll. we have to be careful. most of these individual house

races will be decided in the states. if republicans think nancy pelosi is a great national motivator, our poll tells you, they're down in the generic ballot double digits and trying to make pelosi their big motivating force as a national issue, they're not passing the test, at least not today. >> john king, master of the polls, thanks very much. just moments from now, the white house press secretary is holding her first press briefing since not being able to guarantee that the president is not on tape using a horrible racial epithet. plus, the defense's closing argument is under way right now in the trial of the former trump campaign chairman paul manafort. stand by for the latest. exact moment ... i'm beating this. my main focus was to find a team of doctors. it's not just picking a surgeon, it's picking the care team and feeling secure in where you are. visit cancercenter.com/breast

essential for the cactus, but maybe not for people with rheumatoid arthritis. because there are options. like an "unjection™". xeljanz xr. a once-daily pill for adults with moderate to severe ra for whom methotrexate did not work well enough. xeljanz xr can reduce pain, swelling and further joint damage, even without methotrexate. xeljanz xr can lower your ability to fight infections, including tuberculosis. serious, sometimes fatal infections, lymphoma and other cancers have happened. don't start xeljanz xr if you have an infection. tears in the stomach or intestines,

low blood cell counts and higher liver tests and cholesterol levels have happened. your doctor should perform blood tests before you start and while taking xeljanz xr, and monitor certain liver tests. tell you doctor if you were in a region where fungal infections are common and if you have had tb, hepatitis b or c, or are prone to infections. needles. fine for some things. but for you, one pill a day may provide symptom relief. ask your doctor about xeljanz xr. an "unjection™". there's also a lot to know. the most important thing? medicare doesn't pay for everything. yep...you're on the hook for the rest. so consider an aarp medicare supplement insurance plan, insured by unitedhealthcare insurance company. a plan like this helps pay some of what medicare doesn't. so you could end up paying less. and these are the only plans of their kind endorsed by aarp. selected for meeting their high standards of quality and service. call unitedhealthcare insurance company now to request this free decision guide,

and learn more. like, medicare supplement plan, give you the freedom to go with any doctor who accepts medicare patients. it's nice to have a choice. and your coverage goes with you, anywhere you travel in the country. we have grandkids out of state. they love our long visits. not sure about their parents, though. call unitedhealthcare and ask for your free decision guide today. call unitedhealthcare booking a flight doesn't have to be expensive. just go to priceline. it's the best place to book a flight a few days before my trip and still save up to 40%. just tap and go... for the best savings on flights, go to priceline.

tariff turmoil. turkey hitting back at the u.s., announcing new tariffs on several american products, including cars, alcohol and tobacco. the tariffs intensifying as a turkish court rejects a second appeal to release an american pastor, andrew brunson who turkey believes was part of an attempted coup in turkey in 2016, all of this contributing to a tumbling turkish economy. you can see the dow down more than 200 points. here with me now, columnist nor the "washington post," josh rogan. this pits strong-willed men against each other, erdogan and trump. what backs them off the edge? by the way, turkey is a nato ally. >> it wasn't so long that trump called erdogan a friend. and now he's escalating not only a tariff and trade war, but a sanctions war against our nato

ally. and he's demanding the release of american pastor andrew brunson, who was arrested on october 16th under trumped charges of espionage, trying to overthrow the government with little evidence that's true. now, why has the president committed to this one case, when there are other americans in prison in turkey and everywhere around the world? it so happens that brunson and his family are represented by the president's personal attorney, the american center for law and justice, the organization that he runs. so they have a special access, and the president and the vice president have taken this as their personal cause. there were negotiations. now there aren't. they're not going to back down. they want brunson released or the trade war and tariff war, and sanctions war with turkey will continue. >> it is driving the same time turkey closer to russia, is it not? this, again, a nato ally. >> sure, because wars have consequences and collateral damage. and a bad turkish economy is bad for the region. and there's not a clear way out. it's really easy to inflict on

turkey's economy. hard to get them to change their behavior. and what will happen for sure is that they will see the united states as an unreliable ally. they're already acting like an unreliable ally and that pushes them closer to russia and iran, also facing u.s. sanctions and it's not clear what the off-ramp is. right now we're just escalating, escalating, escalating, with no end in sight. >> josh rogan, thanks very much. under way now, the defense begins its closing arguments in the trial of president trump's former campaign chairman, paul manafort. this after the defense declined to present a case or call any witnesses. plus, the white house briefing just moments away. these are live pictures from the briefing room. stand by. baby boomers,

here's something you should know. there's a serious virus out there that 1 in 30 boomers has, yet most don't even know it. a virus that's been almost forgotten. it's hepatitis c. hep c can hide in the body for years without symptoms. left untreated it can lead to liver damage, even liver cancer. the only way to know if you have hep c is to ask your healthcare provider for the simple blood test. if you have hep c, it can be cured. for us, it's time to get tested. it's the only way to know for sure.

for us, it's time to get tested. does your business internet provider promise a lot? let's see who delivers more. comcast business gives you gig-speed in more places. the others don't. we offer up to 6 hours of 4g wireless network backup. everyone else, no way. we let calls from any of your devices come from your business number. them, not so much.

we let you keep an eye on your business from anywhere. the others? nope! for a limited time, when you get fast, reliable internet, you can add voice for just $24.95 more per month. call or go online today. call or go on line today. hi there, i'm brooke baldwin. you're watching cnn. thank you for being with me. the white house briefing is set to begin any moment there, as the defense is about to give its final pitch to the jury in the fraud trial of the president's former campaign chairman. and as a verdict on paul manafort draws near, questions of race and this president are drawing even more controversy. all of this and trump's attorney is making a pointed threat toward the special counsel, robert mueller. rudy guiliani telling bloomberg news, if mueller doesn't finish the russia investigation in, quote, unquote,