says they are beginning to recognize patterns of cyber activity by people trying to interfere with u.s. elections. >> clearly, the u.s. military cyber command, they know what they're doing. barbara starr at the pentagon, thanks very much, and thanks to our viewers for watching. "erin burnett outfront" starts "erin burnett outfront" starts right now. -- captions by vitac -- www.vitac.com "outfront" next, president trump says he's a nationalist and he's sticking to it. does he really not know what that word means to so many people? plus, president trump says he's, quote, shattering the blue wave and he's not letting up in the days before the election. here to respond, dnc chairman tom perez and our race of the day. could a 26-year-old tape stop stacey abrams from becoming the country's first black woman governor? let's go "outfront." good evening, i'm jake tapper in for erin burnett tonight. trump, the nationalist, the president of the united states is tonight embracing the

controversial term, nationalist. it's a term he used twice just today within a matter of two hours. >> call me a nationalist if you'd like. >> call him a nationalist if you'd like. it's a broad term with many definitions, but most politicians in this country avoid using it because it's a word loaded with the baggage of bigotry. european nationalist parties with anti-immigrant and anti-semitic rhetoric. today, white nationalists in the u.s., which is really just a polite name for white supremacists and white separatists. racists. but when asked this afternoon by cnn's jim acosta about theories out there that the president's embracing this term as a dog whistle because of possible racist or xenophobic insinuations, president trump said he was surprised to hear that. >> i never even heard that. i cannot imagine that. you mean i say i'm a nationalist -- i never heard that theory about being a nationalist. i've heard them all. but i'm somebody that loves our

country. i'm proud of our country, and i am a nationalist. it's a word that hasn't been used too much. people use it, but i'm very proud. i think it should be brought back. >> now, the president went on to try to explain that he was using the term to convey his love of country, his desire for fair trade deals, and the need for american allies to pay their fair share when it comes to their own defense. but here's the thing. when the president first used the term last night in texas, he acknowledged that some folks might find the term offensive. he said, quote, we're not supposed to use that word. >> you know, they have a word, it sort of became old-fashioned. it's called a nationalist. and i say, really,s we're not supposed to use that word. you know what i am? i'm a nationalist, okay? i'm a nationalist. >> the president's embrace of the term comes not only with the baggage of the word but the baggage of the president. for instance, his current campaign attacks on the migrant

caravan and made-up accusations that, quote, unknown middle easterners are in that caravan. whether it's claiming a judge born in indiana can't do his job fairly because of his mexican heritage or the president's frequent refusal to call out white supremacists, it's going to be difficult for lots of americans to see this term, nationalist, through the president's brand-new definition of it. >> we're building a wall. he's a mexican. we're building a wall between here and mexico. >> if you are saying he can't do his job because of his race, is that not the definition of racism? >> no, i don't think so at all. >> will you, unequivocally, condemn david duke and say that you don't want his vote or that of other white supremacists in this election? >> well, just so you understand, i don't know anything about david duke, okay? i don't know anything about what you're even talking about with white supremacy or why is supremacists. >> i guess the question from the

antidefamation league is, even if you don't know about their endorsement, there are these groups and individuals endorsing you, would you just say, unequivocally, you condemn them and you don't want their support? >> well, i have to look at the group. i think there's blame on both sides. you look at -- you look at both sides. i think there's blame on both sides and i have no doubt about it and you don't have any doubt about it either. >> by the way, speaking of former klan leader david duke, he praised trump on twitter today for using the term nationalist, saying he's defending the rights and heritage of white people and white people love him for it. the reaction from the other side, democratic congressman gregory meeks, for instance, not so positive. >> it reminds me of the kind of words that came from people like hitler who thought that in germany, he was a nationalist. that language that the president is utilizing is a very dangerous

language. >> now, we don't know. we aren't sure how the president truly, in his heart, defines this word. but we do know, from his saying, we're not supposed to use that word, that he recognizes many americans might find it offensive. and that's because the president knows many americans think that the word he is now embracing is one that is hostile to them, even though they, too, are part of this nation. pamela brown is "outfront" live outside the white house. pamela, what's the back story behind president trump really digging in his heels on using this word, nationalist? are you hearing that there's a serious strategy behind it? >> reporter: well, jake, i just spoke to a senior white house official who said, no, this wasn't part of a serious broader strategy ahead of the midterms, and this official basically said that he doesn't know where it came from. it appears that this was the

president playing to the crowd, seeing how it worked with the crowd. first using this label, calling himself a nationalist at this houston rally last night while stumping for ted cruz, and after he labeled himself that, the crowd started cheering, chanting, usa, usa, and so it appears that the president thought that it worked well with the crowd and you heard him say it again today for a second day in a row, calling himself a nationalist. but as you pointed out, he knows it's a controversial word. he said, this is probably a word i shouldn't use, given the historical baggage, the fact that it's been used in relation to naziism, white nationalism. now, he rejected that notion, saying he meant the word as he wants to protect american jobs, using it in relation to his trade deals he's been working out with canada and mexico, so it's clear, jake, that the president is not backing down, and he thinks that this is a word that works well with his base ahead of the midterms.

>> all right, pamela brown, thanks so much. "outfront" now, wesley lowry, pulitzer prize winning reporter for the "washington post," david gergen, former adviser for four presidents, democrats and republicans, and andre bauer, former governor of south carolina. wes, you've covered race relations in this country extensively. what's your reaction to this -- president trump, you know, doubling down, tripling down, calling himself a nationalist. >> well, first of all, it was really interesting watching this whole riff where he's talking about globalists versus nationalists and in many ways, it's language that echoed steve bannon, and for anyone who's read breitbart.com, that's the exact type of framing and language that's often used, very often anti-semitic undertones to it, racist undertones. so you have two things. the president was giving voice and word and a term to his

policies and how he's run his campaign. he started his campaign disparaging mexican immigrants as possibly rapists, refooused to condemn white nationalists and white supremacists. he resurfaced the term america first as a campaign slogan. so he was, in some ways, owning the term that really does encapsulate who he is both in the ways he plays footsie with these dark, racist forces in our society but also in terms of how he campaigns and mobile isles -- mobi mobilizes his base, us versus them. so it is fitting that he acknowledged what he is. >> andre, president trump says this is just about trade. this is just about making sure that american allies pay their fair share. that's kind of a new definition of the term. do you think the president is truly just trying to redefine what the word means or is he trying to tap into something else? >> well, couple things, jake. number one, i went back and looked at a tape.

in 1988, on oprah's show, he said, i'm so tired of seeing our country ripped off. then i went and pulled the definition from webster. it says, loyalty and devotion of a nation. google defines it as advocacy of a political independence for a particular country. i truly believe, as a trump supporter, our president is in his 70s. he has loved this country for many, many years, talked about trade imbalances for decades, and he truly believes, and the crowd even started chanting, usa. they are people. there are so many people in this country that feel like, for too long, we've supported other countries that voted against us in the u.n., that ripped us off in trade imbalances, and we have had unfair deals where we feel like we have been not treated fairly and so there are a lot of people in the country that there's nothing racist whatsoever. they truly believe that when you elect a leader for that country, they should look out for that country first and foremost and the people that live in it. >> david gergen, take a listen to what vice president biden had to say today. >> no president has ever led by fear. not lincoln, not roosevelt, not

kennedy, not reagan. this president is more like george wallace than george washington. >> more like george wallace than george washington. wallace, of course, a former governor of alabama, former democrat, he supported segregation, was a vocal opponent of the civil rights movement. is that fair? >> i frankly think it goes a little far. i don't think that donald trump is george wallace. i do think he plays upon the resentment and the anxieties of white americans and when he calls himself a nationalist, you can almost hear the preface or the prefatory word, white. because that's the message he's sending. we all know that. it is true that there are many, many americans who love this country, but the distinction that has been historically accepted about the difference -- there's a difference between patriotism and nationalism. this is something george or well wrote about in a book on nationalism, and patriotism is about love of country. patriotism is about being loyal

to country. nationalism is about a search, an obsession with power, power for the country and indeed for the strong man and so you associate the day with people like hungary, the authoritarians who have risen in our midst, they are almost a person who is considered nationalists. that's why this sends a worrying signal across the political landscape. >> in addition, wes, to the baggage that the word has, the president has some baggage himself when it comes to issues having to do with race. on april 18th, he tweeted about sanctuary cities, writing, there's a revolution going on in california, so many sanctuary areas want out of this ridiculous crime-infested and breeding concept. when tweeting about caravans, he said, act now, congress, or our country is being stolen. last august, of course, in the wake of the charlottesville riots, he said, sad to see the history and culture of our beautiful country being ripped

apart with the removal of our beautiful statues and monuments. talking about confederate monuments. how do you think he views this? does he really believe this? does he see this as a means to an end? what's going on in his mind, do you think? >> certainly. it's difficult to ever surmise exactly what may be happening in anyone's mind, much less president trump's, but it's clear, after this amount of time, it's not as if no one has ever walked into president trump and said, hey, by the way, everyone thinks these things you're saying are kind of racist and here's why. i'm sure someone in the white house has done that, whether it be after charlottesville or the tweets about the caravans or the tweets. i'd like to give the president credit for being shrewd. he was elected on a white grievance platform. his coalition was largely white, aggrieved americans, many of whom believe very earnestly that there is a major immigration crisis, that these are sincerely held beliefs for many americans

but the reality is that coalition, that support is the politics of white grievance and the president, time and time again, plays it up. he's not just talking about immigration and jobs. he's using specific language about who these people are and why they might be coming, stealing our country away and what we know is that our history has a long and pretty ugly moments where immigrants of all sorts have been described this way and the president, time and time again, uses very similar language to that. >> andre, obviously, the president is trying to get republican voters to the polls, the election is in two weeks. and so, i'm quite sure he thinks that this is going to help motivate people. i do wonder, do you have any concerns that this might turn off some people that republicans need as well? i'm thinking specifically about the voters who are putting all these congressional districts up for grabs, college educated women, many of whom are republican. >> well, again, i don't believe that's what the president intended to do.

i think some people are now trying to turn that. jake, the president, for five decades, worked in one of the most diverse cities in the world. he worked with blacks and whites and people of all races and colors with unions and elected leaders from across the board and nobody ever said this about him. he got things done. >> well, andre, he was sued by the nixon administration. >> you couldn't get these things done if you were that racist. >> he was sued for discrimination in housing by the nixon administration. >> again, he was one of the most successful developers that new york city's ever had. how did he become so successful and working with all these groups if he was that way? i disagree. look, you asked me my opinion. you don't have to agree with me but i'm on here to give a different perspective. i'm telling you, i don't think he meant that. webster has not changed their meaning of being a nationalist so i think people look through the certain type of lenses they want to get a story but the president knows his base is going to come out. i don't think he's going to do anything to stir the pot the

other way to come out. >> david gergen, final idea on whether or not this will help or hurt him. >> i think it gets in the way of his message. i think it scares some of the people but he ought to be out campaigning on jobs and the progress that's been made on the economy and every day he waikz up and goes out and hits the mexicans and hits this nationalist chord, does the horse face stuff. it just clouds the issues, and i think it ultimately hurts him >> all right, everyone, stick with me. we have a lot more to talk about. "outfront" next, the woman running to be georgia's next governor, speaking out after this video emerged of her as a college student burning georgia's former state flag, a flag that included a confederate symbol at the time. plus, be afraid. that is a message that we're hearing from the campaign trail. how are democrats fighting back against the republican push? the chairman of the dnc, tom perez, is my guest. and the u.s. is revoking the visas of suspects in the murder of a "washington post" journalist. is that the severe punishment president trump has been promising? stay with us.

♪ when the moon hits your eye ♪ like a big pizza pie ♪ that's amore ♪when the world seems to shine ♪like you've had too much wine ♪ that's amore ♪ bells will ring ♪ ting a ling a ling ♪ ting a ling a ling more to love. applebee's new neighborhood pastas. now that's eatin' good in the neighborhood.

[woman 2] ..this... [man 1] ...this is my body of proof. [man 2] proof of less joint pain... [woman 3] ...and clearer skin. [man 3] proof that i can fight psoriatic arthritis... [woman 4] ...with humira. [woman 5] humira targets and blocks a specific source of inflammation that contributes to both joint and skin symptoms. it's proven to help relieve pain, stop further irreversible joint damage, and clear skin in many adults. humira is the number one prescribed biologic for psoriatic arthritis. [avo] humira can lower your ability to fight infections. serious and sometimes fatal infections, including tuberculosis, and cancers, including lymphoma, have happened, as have blood, liver, and nervous system problems, serious allergic reactions, and new or worsening heart failure. tell your doctor if you've been to areas where certain fungal infections are common and if you've had tb, hepatitis b,

are prone to infections, or have flu-like symptoms or sores. don't start humira if you have an infection. [woman 6] ask your rheumatologist about humira. [woman 7] go to mypsaproof.com to see proof in action. introducing ore-ida potato pay. where ore-ida golden crinkles are your crispy currency to pay for bites of this... ...with this. when kids won't eat dinner, potato pay them to. ore-ida. win at mealtime. is my competitive edge. it senses our movements and automatically adjusts to keep us both effortlessly comfortable. so i'm at my best for this team... and the home team. sleep number proven quality sleep, from $999. you want relief fast. only new thermacare ultra pain relieving cream has 4 active ingredients, to fight pain 4 different ways. get relief fast with new thermacare ultra pain relieving cream.

and then, more jobs robegan to appear.. what started with one job spread all around. because each job in energy creates many more in this town. a race of the day now. tonight, an 11th hour twist in one of the most closely watched governor's races until the country as democrat stacey abrams just started her first debate tonight against republican brian kemp. footage has emerged from 1992 when abrams was a freshman in college, showing her burning georgia's former state flag. it was an act of protest against the confederate battle symbol.

kaylee hartung is out front with our race of the day. >> we cannot ignore the power of racist symbolism. >> reporter: hours before the first gubernatorial debate in georgia, democrat stacey abrams defending her presence at a 1992 protest on the steps of the georgia capitol. the old georgia state flag, burning before her. in a statement, abrams' campaign saying her actions, while a student at spellman college, were part of a permitted peaceful protest. 11 years after the protest, the confederate battle flag emblem was removed from the state's flag but the raw emotions of that debate still linger. >> i love that flag. i still do. >> reporter: the episode surfacing with two weekends until election day in one of the most hotly contested races in the country, splitting an ar sharply divided electorate. >> i was pretty distraught that somebody that i knew was dishonest and is running a dishonest campaign would have done something like that even though it was in her younger years. >> i think that burning the flag

is a sign of protest and i think we have a right to protest, and each person has that right to do that. as far as stacey abrams, i think she'll make a fantastic governor. >> stacey abrams. >> reporter: georgia's heritage, a recurring theme in this race. abrams, who would be the first black female governor in the country, has called for the giant carving on stone mountain, a confederate memorial, to be removed. republican brian kemp has vowed to protect it and other historical monuments from, quote, the radical left. kemp's messaging strategy is consistent. >> stacey abrams, too extreme for georgia. >> reporter: casting abrams as an out of touch liberal, attacking her big money endorsements from out of state and her progressive policies on health care and immigration. in a changing georgia, some voters say they prefer abrams' agenda. >> georgia is a progressive state. and for us to grow, we need to change. her being elected as the governor, i think that would be good for the state of georgia. >> i don't want anyone to vote

for me because i'm black. i don't want anyone to vote for me because i'm a woman. but because i'm a black woman, you know i've done a lot of good to get to where i am. >> reporter: with early voting under way, the test for abrams will be to keep the focus on her core issues and not the flag. >> we don't know how this is going to motivate voters one way or the other, but one thing we can almost certainly say, and that is with just two weeks to go until election day, this is not the sort of distraction that stacey abrams would choose to have to deal with. >> reporter: this debate sponsored by the atlanta press club began at the top of the hour. stacey abrams was asked about that 1992 incident right out of the gate. she said she is a proud georgian and she protested as such. earlier today, brian kemp's campaign told me he wouldn't be issuing a statement in reaction to the news as it broke, they said any statement about the incident would come from him tonight during this debate but he has not yet had an

opportunity to address it. >> kaylee, thank you so much. i'm back with wes, david, andre, also joining us, simone sanders, communication consultant for priorities usa and former national press secretary for bernie 2016. let me start with you, simone. i want to ask you, stacey abrams has confirmed she participated in the burning of the state flag of georgia. it had confederate symbolism at the time. do you think that this is going to affect anything in the race? could this cause moderate voters to lean away from her? >> well, jake, i think that voters that if the confederate flag was their only issue, i don't think stacey abrams was going to win them anyway. i do think that the abrams campaign is not allowing this distraction and this attempt at the 11th hour of opposition research, frankly, to derail their campaign. i will also note that in 1956, the georgia assembly changed the flag to the flag -- the former flag that was seen in that video as a direct affront to

integration. that's what this was really about, and so stacey abrams stood by her participation in that protest earlier in the debate tonight, and i do believe that is, in fact, why. >> that's right, democratic governor marvin griffin who had campaigned as the white man's candidate with a promise to prevent the state schools from being integrated, quote, come hell or high water is chiefly responsible for the flag having the confederate symbol on it, and there is that context, which is very important. you can see the flag that was burned there on the left and the current flag on the right. andre, what do you think? >> i think, actually, it's probably good that this is the video that's out and not one where she's seen against the second amendment in georgia. i think it's a huge issue as well as where she's quoted as saying she's sick and tired of hearing about the free market being the solution. i think those affect moderate voters much more than the flag. i don't think the flag, one way or the other, moves a lot of people that were either for or

against her but i think some of these other issues that deal with second amendment rights or business or free market, i think those move moderates one way or the other because make no mistake, both of these candidates have been extreme candidates, and so that's why this is such a up in the air race. this is a hugely republican state when you look at 14 of the congressmen, 10 of them are republicans, two u.s. senators republican, every constitutional officer republican. both houses republican. so it's a little shocking that the race has gotten this close. i think towards the end, it will move a little bit more to the "r" side but the main issues that are folks that swing either way, i think those are ones that she would be more afraid of than the flag. i really don't think the flag has that big a bearing on the voters that could go either way. >> david gergen, a big issue, bigger than this flag issue, is brian kemp, the republican, he's also the georgia secretary of state, has been facing weeks of criticism and a lawsuit for allegedly suppressing minority

voters. there is this thing in georgia, the exact match law, and an associated press study revealed that 53,000 or so voter registrations, many of them filed by african-americans, have been flagged and these have not gone through. that's a big issue. do you think that could have an effect? >> oh, yes, i do. and i think the problem for stacey abrams is this story appearing just on the eve of the -- of this debate is going to give an awful lot of ammunition to her republican opponent. he's going to be a keeper on the defensive in the early part of the debate at a very time when she would want to be on the offense about voter suppression. because there are real changes that have taken place in georgia that are very concerning, and you know, the number of polling booths there, polling places over the last six years has been reduced by almost 10%. and the further away you put those polling booths from people who don't have a car, have to

take a bus, do whatever, the less likely it is that they'll vote. the only counter, jake, is i do think what i hear from people close in georgia is that the way the republicans have done this and the way that they -- the attacks they have made on her democratic base, so i think andre's right. this is going to go down to the wire. i'm not going sure it's going to tilt a republican at the end, but i think there are issues on both sides, a very tough race and a fascinating race to boot. >> another tough race going on south of georgia in florida, and wes, i want you to take a listen to this shocking robo call that the "huffington post" got their hands on. it's against andrew gillum, the mayor of tallahassee. it's put out by a white supremacist group in idaho. i want to warn viewers at home, it's disturbing and appallingly racist. let's play some of them. >> well, hello there. i is the negro andrew gillum and

i'll be asking you to make me governor of this here state of florida. my esteemed opponent who done called me monkey is doing a lot of hollering about how expensive my plans for health care be, but he be thinking of the white man's medicine, which is very expensive, because it uses science and whatnot. >> i mean, it's almost from a different era, like from the 1920s or something. >> well, the music in the background is literally from "amos and andy". i pulled a clip from it. what was interesting, you know, the conversations being ahead about stacey abrams, this is a little different than this with andrew gillum and this organization in idaho has historically put up these types of robo calls against black candidates in other states as well. this is their schtick. but in some ways, the tactics are similar. the hope here is not to sway some type of moderate voter who was going one way or the other. this is the idea that if this is a base vote, stacey abrams or andrew gillum, their coalition, which is going to be black, brown, young, much more liberal,

against a more conservative southern coalition that is going to include in these states someone who might be scared by that type of robo call or someone who might feel very strongly about someone burning the confederate flag. the hope is to scare them enough that they show up to vote if perhaps they weren't going to. >> gotv, get out the vote. final thoughts? >> i have been saying this and i'll say it again. if the closing argument for republicans in this midterm election is fear and scare tactics, i don't think they're going to do too well. democrats are out here talking about the issues and i, frankly, am looking forward to calling stacey abrams governor and right along there with andrew gillum as well. >> and just to underline it, the republican candidate in the governor's race condemns this ad and has nothing to do with it. wes, david, simone, thanks so much. "outfront" next, president trump on the campaign trail attacking democrats. >> the democrats have launched an assault on the sovereignty of our country.

>> the dnc chairman will be here to respond. plus, trump's mysterious new tax cuts. is all this talk an admission that his last tax cut didn't do enough for the middle class? stay with us. but some give their clients cookie cutter portfolios. fisher investments tailors portfolios to your goals and needs. some only call when they have something to sell. fisher calls regularly so you stay informed. and while some advisors are happy to earn commissions whether you do well or not. fisher investments fees are structured so we do better when you do better. maybe that's why most of our clients come from other money managers. fisher investments. clearly better money management. not in this house. 'cause that's no so-so family. that's your family. which is why you didn't grab just any cheese. you picked up new kraft expertly paired mozzarella and parmesan for pizzahyeah! kraft. family greatly.

president trump's on the campaign trail, trying to motivate the republican base to get out and vote. >> democrats want to massively raise your taxes, impose socialism on our country. we'll be another venezuela. the democrats have launched an assault on the sovereignty of our country, the security of our

nation, and the safety of every single american. you know how the caravan started? i think the democrats had something to do with it. >> there seems to be something of a spring in the president's step these days with republicans telling cnn that the white house is more confident that the gop will keep the senate and keep losses in the house to a minimum. now, that may or may not be true, but ultimately, a blue wave is no longer a sure thing. "outfront" tonight, the chairman of the democratic national committee, tom perez. mr. perez, good to see you as always. >> good to be with you, jake. >> the "wall street journal" poll shows president trump's approval rating at 47%. it's the highest ever and higher than where president obama was at this point in his presidency. are you worried that the president's message is working? >> well, those approval ratings are about what president obama was at in 2010 and we know what happened in 2010. i don't sit here and think about one poll or another poll. i think about what we're doing

and what we've been doing is organizing everywhere, and we're talking about the issues, jake, that people care most about. we're talking about health care. we're talking about the fact that they want to cut health care. they want to cut coverage for people with preexisting conditions, and now we know from senator mcconnell they want to cut medicare, medicaid, and social security. those are the issues that are on people's minds. and that is what is bringing people out. that's what brought ralph northam to victory last year and in the run-up to those elections, you saw the politics of fear and division, lies, you saw those in those campaigns and this is a staple of the trump campaign and what we're doing is we're focused like a laser on improving people's lives in those critical ways that i've outlined. >> the president is obviously confident, making immigration a main focus on the campaign trail will work. take a listen. >> the democrats would rather destroy american communities

than defend america's borders. the democrats don't care about what their extremist immigration agenda will do to your communities, to your hospitals. what about your hospitals? and to your schools. democrats want to open borders, which equals massive crime coming into our country. republicans want strong borders and we want no crime. >> and now the president is making a big issue of the caravan, of migrants and refugees making its way north. the president says that caravan is not going to be allowed to come into the united states. what's the democrats' message on the caravan? >> well, let's talk about the facts first, jake. as a result of policies that president obama put in -- and let's deal with the facts -- border crossings in fiscal year 2017, which started in 2016 when barack obama was in office, were at the lowest level since the 1970s. that was the trend data.

that is what is happening on the ground. caravans are not new. they have been happening for a number of years, and they are happening because the conditions in these countries are horrific. this is not something new. but donald trump is talking about this because he wants to distract voters from the fact that they want to cut medicare, they want to cut social security, they want to cut medicaid, and they want to make sure that if you have a preexisting condition, you're going to be out of luck. they hope that voters aren't thinking about that on election day. it's distracting donald once again. >> what's the -- but this caravan is coming up. it's about 7,000 people. it's, i think, a few thousand miles away from the bortlder rit now but it will ultimately reach the border. what's the democratic party's message about the caravan? are they going to block them from entering the country or let them come in and apply for r refugee status? what's the message? >> we are a nation of laws and the laws that are on the books deal with issues of refugee and

asylum status and those are the laws that have always applied. they were applied when george w. bush was president, when barack obama was president. they've been in place for decades. and again, yes, you correctly point out, they are a couple thousand miles or a thousand miles away from the border, and they are walking. it's a humanitarian issue of significance, and our laws require that people be treated with dignity and given that process. but donald trump isn't bringing this up for any reason other than to distract people. it's his closing argument. when he's in the biggest trouble, the biggest dog whistle he blows is the immigration dog whistle, and the good news is they tried to do that last year in virginia and new jersey, it depende didn't work, and people understand that. we saw a democratic primary turnout go up 80% from 2014 and we're going to continue to focus on the issues that people care about. we're not going to get distracted. >> chairman perez, okay, it didn't work for the republicans in new jersey and virginia last

year. but it sure as heck worked for president trump in 2016. there's a new poll today from the "washington post" about key congressional battleground races. democrats only have a 3-point edge over republicans, the margin of error is 3 points so this can be seen as a dead heat. we're just two weeks away from election day. what happened to all the momentum of the blue wave? >> well, i never used the term blue wave because human progress never rolls in on wheels of inevitability and the reason why it's difficult and i'm still very confident that we're going to take the house and i believe that we're going to surprise a lot of people in the u.s. senate as well. and the reason why it's hard to win 60, 70 seats is because in the vast majority of states, the districts are so heavily gerrymandered. we know when we get a fair shake, like in states like pennsylvania, where the districts are fair, democrats are going to do very, very well. but it's hard to get to 60 or 70 when you have so many states like ohio and elsewhere where

there's such a heavy gerrymandering. but notwithstanding that, people understand their health care is on the ballot. they understand that medicare and medicaid and social security are on the ballot and frankly our democracy is on the ballot. they're sick and tired of lies. they're sick and tired of the politics of division, and that's why i continue to have a lot of confidence. this is the blocking and tackling phase, jake, and that's exactly what we're doing, getting that vote out. >> dnc chairman tom perez, thanks so much for your time. "outfront" next, president trump's mysterious new tax cut. >> it's going to be a tax reduction of 10% for the middle class. >> but is that real or just a pre-election ploy? plus, president trump calling the murder of jamal khashoggi the, quote, worst cover-up ever. so then why is he giving the saudi leaders so much slack? stay with us. your company is constantly evolving. and the decisions you make have far reaching implications. the right relationship with a corporate bank

who understands your industry and your world can help you make well informed choices and stay ahead of opportunities. pnc brings you the resources of one of the nation's largest banks, and a local approach with a focus on customized insights. so you and your company are ready for today. coaching means making tough choices. jim! you're in! but when you have high blood pressure and need cold medicine that works fast, the choice is simple. coricidin hbp is the #1 brand that gives powerful cold symptom relief without raising your blood pressure. coricidin hbp. beburning, pins and needles of diabetic nerve pain, these feet... ...grew up the youngest of three kids... ...raised a good sport... ...and became a second-generation firefighter. but i couldn't bear my diabetic nerve pain any longer. so i talked to my doctor, and he prescribed lyrica. nerve damage from diabetes causes diabetic nerve pain. lyrica is fda approved to treat this pain, from moderate to even severe diabetic nerve pain. lyrica may cause serious allergic reactions,

suicidal thoughts or actions. tell your doctor right away if you have these, new or worse depression, unusual changes in mood or behavior, swelling, trouble breathing, rash, hives, blisters, muscle pain with fever, tired feeling, or blurry vision. common side effects: dizziness, sleepiness, weight gain, swelling of hands, legs, and feet. don't drink alcohol while taking lyrica. don't drive or use machinery until you know how lyrica affects you. those who have had a drug or alcohol problem may be more likely to misuse lyrica. now i have less diabetic nerve pain. if you're eligible, you could pay as little as $25 a month. visit lyrica.com. minutes can mean the difference between life and death. proposition 11 saves lives by ensuring medical care is not delayed in an emergency. proposition 11 establishes into law

the longstanding industry practice of paying emts and paramedics to remain on-call during breaks and requires they receive fema level training and active shooters and natural disasters. vote yes on 11 to ensure 911 emergency care is there when you or your love one need it.

"outfront" tonight, what new tax cut? president trump has been touting a new tax cut for the middle class, saying he's going to have something to show the american public within the next week or two. take a listen. >> it's going to be a tax reduction of 10% for the middle class. business will not enter into it. we're putting in a resolution, probably this week. i think you folks know about it, and kevin brady's been working on it very hard, really, for a couple months. we'll put that in and start the work sometime after the

midterms. >> okay. so, first, congress is out of session, so introducing a bill would be difficult. and second, congressman kevin brady, the house ways and means chairman said in a statement today that he would work with the white house, quote, to develop an additional 10% tax cut to be advanced as republicans retain the house and senate. retaining the house and senate. that's a big question mark. it means this as of now phantom tax cut isn't happening any time soon, certainly not before the midterms, if at all. "outfront" now, catherine, a columnist for the "washington post" and stephen moore, an informal white house adviser and author of "trumponomics." the plan seems to have taken some people by surprise. a congressional source tells cnn there is no serious plan at the moment but what do you know about what might happen? >> well, let me go back to the campaign. one of the things that trump used to say on the campaign a

lot is if you elect me president, i'm going to cut taxes every year so i think this was harkening back to the campaign of keeping the tax message going and look, i don't actually even know what the 10% tax is. i did a lot of and everybody's kind of tight-lipped but i think the politics of this are good. the democrats are running around the country saying, elect us and we'll repeal the president's tax cut of last year, the big one and now republicans say, look, we want to cut taxes, they want to raise them. that's not a place for republicans to be politically. >> what's your take? i mean, if republicans keep the senate, who knows what's going to happen with the house, it is possible that there will be some movement and you might be able to pick off some democrats. >> i think it's very unlikely at this point. as far as we can tell, trump may have just made this up on the fly. when the -- >> no. >> i know, unheard of. when kevin was asked by reporters today about this tax cut, what analysis did you do, he said, ask trump. he's the one who's talking about it. >> interesting.

>> so, we don't actually know. well, and i'm sorry, the -- your question was -- >> the question is, like, i mean, if trump pushes -- let's say there's a democratic house and republican senate or it's 50/50 or whatever, there is an idea, there is an argument that trump could get a 10% tax cut targeted at the middle class. why would democrats vote against that. >> democrats have, in fact, proposed middle class tax cuts. kamala harris came out with a proposal to essentially expand the eitc and other democrats are on board for that. the problem is we've basically spent all of our fiscal space on this massive $2 trillion tax cut for the wealthy so it's not like there's a lot of room to give the middle class and lower income earners the tax cut that they actually would need. you would have to raise taxes on the high end in order to pay for it. >> this is exactly, i think, why trump is doing this. because the narrative that catherine just described, which i disagree with, which is a giant tax cut for the rich, that has taken hold with a lot of voters. >> it's because it's true.

>> but you know, when you ask them, oh, this is a tax cut for the rich. this is where i kind of blame republicans, jake. i don't think they've done a -- they've got this spectacularly strong economy. it's not that hard to basically say to people, look, we passed this tax cut so we could get a strong and prosperous economy with a lot of jobs and they haven't done a very good job of connecting the dots so they have is to say, we're going to do another tax cut. >> they can't sell what they've got because if you look at every single outside analysis of this tax cut from the tax policy center, from the tax foundation which openly flavors lower taxes, they all say the biggest gains went to the very wealthy and to corporations. i mean, this is not a talking point. this is a fact. >> but you know, like i helped write the plan. the whole idea was to try to make america more competitive place to create more jobs, to have higher incomes for the middle class and so far, we see some good signs for that. look, when you have 7 million more jobs than you have people to fill them, that creates a tight labor market. >> that's a continuation of

previous trends. again, if you look at every single outside analysis of the tax cut -- >> how do you explain what the wall stre "wall street journal" reported, which is they found the biggest wage gains have gone to the lowest americans. >> because they're always the last in every recovery to see gains. you can't attribute that to the tax cut. we are nine years into one of the longest recoveries on record. you can't attribute that to the tax cut. >> one thing i'm hearing from both of you, though, you're saying bad messaging and you're saying bad policy, but you're both saying the reason this is being talked about is because not enough voters think that the tax cut helped the middle class. >> because they're well informed on this point. >> you think it's bad messaging. >> and i think, look, they should be running on a prosperous economy and saying, this isn't a continuation of obama. this is a full-fledged economic boom and you're right, it's not just the tax cut.

it's all of trump's>> just as a there talking a lot about the caravan, about immigration, about he's a nationalist. he's not talking about -- i know a lot of republicans would agree with you 100%. >> trump actually does talk a lot about the economy. it's the republicans on the campaign trail that aren't good at selling it. >> the other issue is even if it were the case that republicans were out there touting the tax cut more aggressively or whatever, it's still not clear that's going to be a winning political message. if you look at polling amongst americans about what they like about the tax code, it's not their own tax liability. they think it's fundamentally unfair. >> thanks so much. great to have you guys. >> out front next, president trump rips into the saudis' h d handling of jamal khashoggi's murder. >> the cover-up was one of the worst in the history of cover-ups. >> so what should the president do now?

former intel chief james clapper is my guest. plus, trump's second sitdown with putin could be weeks away. a basketball costs $14. what's team spirit worth? (cheers) what's it worth to talk to your mom? what's the value of a walk in the woods? the value of capital is to create, not just wealth, but things that matter. morgan stanley

benjamin franklin capturedkey lightening in a bottle. over 260 years later, with a little resourcefulness, ingenuity, and grit, we're not only capturing energy from the sun and wind, we're storing it. as the nation's leader in energy storage, we're ensuring americans have the energy they need, whenever they need it. this is our era. this is america's energy era. nextera energy. - [narrator] at athene, we think it's time for the financial world to stop acting the same old way. in today's complex world, you need a partner that is driven to provide you with better solutions for these challenging times, one that is willing to disrupt the industry, and break free from conventional thinking. (thudding)

we are a different kind of financial company. we are athene, and we are driven to do more. the roasted core wrap. 3, 2, 1... not cool. freezing away fat cells with coolsculpting? now that's cool! coolsculpting safely freezes and removes fat cells with little or no downtime. and no surgery. results and patient experience may vary. some common side effects include temporary numbness, discomfort, and swelling. ask your doctor if coolsculpting is right for you. and visit coolsculpting.com today for your chance to win a free treatment. and visit coolsculpting.com lojust use priceline.ls on travel? you can save up to 60% on hotels. that's like $120 a night back in your pocket. go to priceline to get deals you won't find anywhere else.

breaking news.

a total fiasc co and the cover-up was horrible. that's what president trump was saying of the murder of journalist jamal khashoggi. but the president continues to echo the denials from top saudi leaders who say they had nothing to do with it. >> i would say it was a total fiasco from day one. the cover-up was horrible, the execution was horrible, but they should have never been an execution or cover-up because it should i never happened. the crown prince yesterday, he strongly said that he had nothing to do with this. this was at a lower level. >> outfront now, former national intelligence director under president obama, general james clapper. good to see you. thank you for being here. it seems the president is calling out the saudis for a botched cover-up or a bad operation, but he still gives the crown prince the benefit of the doubt. is that the right line to walk, you think? >> i don't think so. i keep wondering, where is the

moral outrage, which i think should have been the first, any statements we made would be that. and you know, the superfinancial things like they didn't cover it up very well, again, that just emphasizes a lack of moral outrage here. >> let me ask you a question because you were director of national intelligence when saudi arabia launched its war against yemen during the obama administration, and it's gotten worse and worse and worse. they dropped an american-made bomb on a school bus full of yemeni kids a few months ago, under the trump administration, not the obaumpa administration, but some people out there might think that's even more of a moral outrage. >> well, yes. it's maybe not as dramatic or attention getting at this thing with the reporter. and you know, we're kind of implicated in yemen and have

been. we have been trying to assist and help advise the saudis so with respect to targeting and targeting accuracy and all that, but there's, i think, a moral issue there as well. >> the state department says 21 saudis suspected in khashoggi's det have had their u.s. visas revokes or will be ineligible for u.s. visas. it's a strong signal the murder will not be tolerated. >> we're taking appropriate actions which includes revoking visas, entering visa outlooks and other things. we will not tolerate this ruthless action to silence mr. khashoggi through violence. >> that's kind of going along with the saudis' version of events that's it's a bunch of lower level people and the crown prince is not culpable at all. so do you think that's enough? >> no, i don't.

i think that's certainly necessary to take that step, but i don't think it's going to get them where -- the individual to get them where they live very much. i think frankly, much more serious diplomatic actions should have been taken, such as breaking diplomatic relations with saudi for a while or declaring our ambassador png or something like that, but to simply remove visas, that doesn't feel right given the despicable nature of what's happened. >> i want to ask you also about this possible meeting president trump is going to have with president putin in paris on november 11th. i think it's fair to say that the helsinki summit did not get the kind of reviews the president thought it would. do you have any concerns about a

second summit? >> well, i would hope that this would be an opportunity maybe to recover from what happened in helsinki. i think it would be appropriate to talk about the inf treaty, for example. i think the two, since this was signed by two leaders, gorbachev and reagan at the time, if we're going to end it, there should be, you know, dialogue between the two leaders now. >> this is the treaty the u.s. is talking about pulling out of? >> right. exactly. >> because russia has been violating it. >> right. >> has russia been violating it? >> yes, they have. that was clear to us in the last administration. they have been in violation of it since about 2014. >> is there anything wrong with him pulling out? >> there's an already for him pulling out of it. there's a dimension of china, for example, who is not bound by it. so perhaps if china were to

agree to bye-bye the inf treaty, i doubt they will do that, so yes, that's what it's about. and there may be a case to be made for it. >> all right, general clapper. always good to see you. thanks for joining us. "ac 360" starts right now. >> good evening. late today, the president of the united states spoke to reporters. he made a string of false and unsupported claims, the kind that stoke fear in many americans just 14 days before elections. he trotted out vice president pence to back up some of those claims which the vice president, as you'll see, wasn't really able to do. then after doubling and tripling down on his still unsupported claims, he said this -- >> there's no proof of anything. there's no proof of anything. >> he was talking there about his claims that the caravan of central american migrants walking north through mexico is infiltrated by middle