i want to begin tonight's rally by addressing the suspicious devices and packages that were mailed to current and former high-ranking government officials. my highest duty, as you know, as president, is to keep america safe. that's what we talk about. that's what we do. the federal government is conducting an aggressive investigation and we will find those responsible and we will bring them to justice. hopefully very quickly. any acts or threats of political violence are an attack on our democracy, itself. no nation can succeed that tolerates violence or the threat of violence as a method of political intimidation, coercion, or control. we all know that. such conduct must be fiercely

opposed and firmly prosecuted. we want all sides to come together in peace and harmony. we wan can do it. we can do it. we can do it. it will happen. more broadly, there's much we can do to bring our nation together. for example, those engaged in the political arena must stop treating political opponents as being morally defective. have to do that. the language of moral condemnation and destructive routine, these are arguments and disagreements that have to stop. no one should carelessly compare political opponents to historical villains, which is done often. it's done all the time. got to stop. we should not mob people in public spaces or destroy public

property. there is one way to settle our disagreements. it's called peacefully at the ballot box. that's what we want. that's what we want. as part of a larger national effort to bridge our divides and bring people together, the media also has a responsibility to set a civil tone and to stop the endless hostility and constant negative and oftentimes false attacks and stories. have to do it. they've got to stop. bring people together. we're just 13 days away from a very, very important election. it's an election of monumental,

just if you look at it, monumental importance. isn't it? wouldn't you say monumental importance? there are dramatic differences between our two political parties. that, we know. it is essential for democracy to draw a sharp contrast between the two different platforms put before the american people. and we have a chance to do that right now in many states and on november 6th. we need more, not less, debate about policy issues in our country. but what we cannot do is let our -- >> the president speaking in wisconsin. speaking quite hypocritically, i just have to say. he talked about explosive devices being sent to former government officials. he made no mention of an explosive device sent to this building behind me. the headquarters of cnn. a news organization he routinely

attacks. he calls reporters the enemy of the american people. and, yet, he said it's the media's fault for the kind of reporting that media organizations have been doing. what happened today was an act of terror. terror designed to kill or maim, to scare, or to silence. now, thankfully, none of those targeted were hurt nor were any of the people who handled the explosive devices, i'm talking about postal workers, couriers, security guards. they weren't hurt or killed, either. if the devices were designed to kill, they failed. they were designed to scare and to silence reporters or politicians. they failed at that as well. we here at cnn are thankful for the sharp eyes and the quick thinking of the men and women who protect us every single day in this building and around the country and the world and for the quick response and expertise of the new york city police department and all the other agencies now involved in what is a massive and ongoing

investigation. terror only works when it produces fear. we are not afraid. we are here and we will be here tomorrow and we'll be here the day after and we'll be here the day after that. we have a job to do.y ied to do here today, it only makes our resolve that much stronger. tonight the search is on if ffoe person or persons who tried to murder and might have murdered a string of high-profile political figures including former secretary of state and two former presidents of the united states. five bombs. one is yet possible bomb which is still being assessed and just moments ago word of yet one more suspicious package. the first went to billionaire liberal financier george soros. the rest were discovered in the last 24 hours all addressed to people that president trump, himself, has singled out for verbal abuse. one targeting a former cia director was sent, as i said, to the building behind me. the new york headquarters of

cnn. >> these are no longer suspicious packages. >> reporter: shortly after 10:00 a.m., cnn is givining an updaten suspicious packages mailed to democratic politicians. >> that's a -- excuse me, that sounds like a fire alarm ear. we'll keep you posted on that. >> we're going to jump in, there's a fire alarm here. >> might have heard it in the background. >> reporter: the time warner center home to cnn's new york office was abruptly evacuated. >> we are outside safely. all of our cnn colleagues that we know of are outside right now. everyone is safe. >> reporter: the package was sent to cnn's mailroom, addressed to former cia director john brennan, who's become a frequent critic of president tru trump's. brennan whose name is wrongly spelled on the package works as an analyst for nbc news, not cnn. this week, alone, six devices were found by authorities, four of them intercepted just today. all addressed to democratic politicians, donors, or in our case, the news media. >> was clearly an act of terror,

attempting to undermine our free press and leaders of this country through acts of violence rp a . >> reporter: on monday a bomb was found inside the mailbox of george soros, soros recently accused by president trump of paying ro te ining protesters tr anti-kavanaugh demonstrations during his confirmation hearing. . on tuesday a package was found at the clintons' home in chappaqua, new york. it also contained an explosive device. on wednesday, secret service intercepted another one sent to former president barack obama. please say these bombs all seem to be connected. >> as you've heard, there is a number of devices and there's a pattern, apparently, to the number of devices. we wouldn't be at all surprised if more devices show up. >> reporter: two additional suspicious packages were sent to former attorney general eric hole holder and california democratic congresswoman maxine waters.

the package sent to holder wound up at the office of democratic representative debbie wasserman-schultz in florida. she was listed as the return address for the package. which is the same return address listed for bombs sent to cnn, the obamas, and the clintons. six suspicious devices intercepted in just one week. and authorities fear there may be more on the way. meantime, two of the intended victims have spoken out. want to tell you about that. hillary clinton earlier today and john brennan just a short time ago. >> i recognize that there are a lot of raw emotions and feelings in this country and very strong feelings for individual political parties, as well as individual politicians. but this country was founded upon the foundation of freedom and liberty and freedom of speech. and if i and others are being

targeted because we're speaking out, and we're living up to our responsibilities as citizens, i think that's, again, is a very unfortunate turn of events. >> we are fine. thanks to the men and women of the secret service who intercepted the package addressed to us long before it made its way to our home. every day, we are grateful for their service and commitment and obviously never more than today. but it is a troubling time, isn't it? >> it is, indeed. for more on the investigation, let's get to the latest on the investigation. including this latest and newest suspicious package. i want to turn to cnn's pamela brown who's been working her sources from the very beginning. pamela, what's the latest, what have you learned? >> we're learning, anderson,

about a second suspicious package addressed to democratic congresswoman maxine waters, this time in california. this is according to my colleague, mary kay malany who was reporting that atf as well as the lapd are on their way to a postal facility in south-central l.a. to look at this package that is very similar to the packages, the suspicious packages, that were examined in florida, as well as d.c. and new york. we know earlier today, there was another package addressed to maxine waters that was recovered at a facility in maryland. so this is yet a second one. the fbi is still examining the earlier package that was addressed to maxine waters, but they all share this similarity of the manila envelopes, the six forever stamps, the computer-generated labels. all of these are clues to investigators that these packages are linked. and the fbi just earlier today released this statement asking the public for help saying that there could be more packages that are out there. and we know, anderson, that at

least one of the devices, this pipe bomb, contained sulfur, an explosive material. pipe bombs are notoriously unstable, anderson, and could explode just through handling it, so in some ways, officials i've been speaking with say it's remarkable that nothing was set off here. >> yeah, i mean, it would have very easily, one of these been detonated just by a postal carrier. >> yep. >> or in a sorting room somewhere. just in terms of the investigation, i assume the fbi is in charge and they're the ones who -- they don't already have all the devices, they soon will. >> that's absolutely right. all the devices will eventually make their way to the fbi's facility at quantico, and the fbi is looking at this as an act of domestic terror. that is, an individual who acts through an extremist ideology, whether it be political, social, racial, in nature, and in this case, you look at the targets, and it appears that there's a political motivation here.

these are -- these targets are high-profile democrats, many of whom served under the obama administration. so that is a clue to the fbi. they're looking at in terms of who might be behind this, understanding what is part of the mindset here. now, my colleague, jeff zeleny, asked president trump earlier today whether he believed this was an act of domestic terror. he would not answer that question, anderson. >> should also point out not just high-profile democrats, also john brennan, former high-ranking, you know, head of the cia and obviously cnn as well. all people that this president has verbally targeted and encouraged others to criticize as well. pam, i appreciate the reporting. the fact that none of these bombs went off, obviously, gives investigators an awful lot to work with in terms of potential evidence. as pam said, they're all said to be similar. this happens to be one that came here to cnn. authorities released the photo.

i'm not showing you anything that i shouldn't be showing you. the authorities released this photo. so no one gets any ideas. neither the authorities or we are going into great detail about the devices, themselves, about how these things are made. you obviously see in the photo a sill lind cylinderical container, wires out of each end, what appears to be the face of a small clock. the package is addressed to former cia chief john brennan. his name is misspelled. president trump has called mr. brennan, who's dedicated his life, frankly, to public service, quote, a very bad guy. he actually doesn't work for cnn. the return address is debbie wasserman-schultz. formerly the dnc in sunrise which is also miss spelled, florida. the bomb was taken to the new york police department's facility in the bronx. and, again, as pam mentioned from there, it goes to quantico, virginia, where the fbi will study it. i want to talk more about the many roads that could lead investigators to whoever did this. with me right now, retired nypd,

darren, he teaches here in the new york area. also joining me is former fbi supervisory special agent, josh campbell. he's cnn law enforcement analyst. and former senior counterterrorism official, phil mudd joins us as well. darren, just from what the fact all of these devices are now in the hand of authorities, there are many potential clues that could be in these devices. >> absolutely. when we look at these investigations into explosive ordnance, i like to figure it out as a three-legged stool. the first leg of the stool is the actual ordnance, what is the signature connected with this ordn ordnance. >> a bomb maker often has a signature, a particular way they make a bomb over and over. >> exactly. this is something law enforcement stores and look to moving forward. the second leg to the stool is the delivery system. we've had different delivery systems in connection with this particular ordnance. here at cnn, for example, we had a courier that delivered it.

we had other locations where u.s. mail delivered this particular ordnance. you -- the u.s. mail service has a record. they take a snapshot of all packages that go through the system. and the third leg to the stool is the actual target. when i say the target, meaning who was the intended victim here? we want to look at the commonality factor in connection with threats. we had eight to ten people that had these packages mailed to them. we want to see if we had consistent threats to these individuals by one person. so we take those three legs to the stool and that's how the investigation moves forward. one of the things we have to take into consideration are the teachable moments that law enforcement has experienced in the past such as what happened earlier this year in march. when we had the austin bomber. we'll look at the way that bomber progressed and law enforcement is going to use that, such as widening the video. we even saw how we have pictures from the fedex location. the second teachable moment would be we go back to 2001,

when we had the anthrax scare here in new york city. the nypd had hammer teams that went to different locations. coupled with the fbi joint terrorist task force. and the third, and i want to say the most significant piece, is the unibomber, ted kaczynski. those three components are going to triangulate and we're going to focus on this particular investigation moving forward. >> josh, you were formerly with the fbi. right now what stands out to you about what we have seen take place here? >> well, so there are two aspects. there's obviously the forensic commonalities we've been talk ig about that a number of devices all have the same construction, the same make kbruup. obviously, we're dealing with the same person or group of people that are constructing them but also as investigators try to get into the mind yn sse this person or group of people are still at large, they have not been caught. investigators are essentially racing against the clock to determine who these people are, to get in their mind. obviously if you look at the number of targets, they all have those commonalities. these are democrats, progressives or people who have received the ire from the president and his allies.

so, again, politicians will look at that and say, well, that's politics, let's not talk about that.ing about that. again, they're trying to get to the bottom of what is motivating this person, inspiring this person to do this. i'll tell you, when i mentioned, anderson, it's a race against the clock. we don't have people in custody. we don't know if there are other devices out there. e with don we don't know if this person will act again. i spoke to someone a while ago, we've been working local law enforcement sources, it was described by a source, this is the most important investigation for the united states government right now. we are dealing with the attempted assassination of two former presidents, and a number of officials. it's very serious and so far, you know, the clues are continuing to work, but they don't yet have the leads that will get them to that person. it's all hands on deck right now, and snd. >> phil, you also have handwriting on the packages, misspellings on some of the packages. anybody in public life probably, i know i have folders full of letters from, you know, all variety of people who have written over the years.

threats or whatever it may be. those are all things, certainly anybody who's president of the united states probably has boxes and boxes full or the secret service already has boxes and boxes full of handwriting analysis on thousands of people. >> i think that's right. one of the things -- you're looking at a joint terrorism task force led by the fbi. you might consider that because that says fbi, that it's mostly fbi individuals involved there, but the elements there include people like the postal service who's going to be looking at where stuff like this was mail . they are excellent at tracking packages. you mentioned the lettering on the packages. josh was talking about the targets. one of the elements of the joint terrorism task force is the secret service. in addition to asking questions like who was that courier that delivered something to the time warner building today, the secret service would ask, do we have people on file who have sent stuff like this in the past or who have this list of potential targets and who have approached targets like this in the past? i tell you, one of the things

that strikes me about this, anders anderson, is there are so many clues here from targets, to packages, to devices, potentially we don't know if there are fingerprints or dna on those packages. i don't think this person is going to be free for long. there are too many clues here. >> do you agree with that, i mean, there's just a bonanza of potential clues? is. >> absolutely. one of the things we take into consideration, a place like new york city, the average citizen is videotaped or photographed 100 to 200 times a day and goes back to when we look at the apprehension of the bomber in austin, texas. the way that person is caught is because we captured him on joid in austin, texas, entering a fedex facility. i think the same thing is going to happen here. i believe this is a an amateur. this is a rudimentary device, black powder. something that's more sophisticated like anthrax, you have a more targeted approach. here i believe it's a matter of time and we will catch this person moving forward. >> darren, thanks so much, josh campbell as well, phil mudd as well. sorry we were talking under

these circumstances. next, president trump speaking tonight in wisconsin. we showed you a little bit of that but we learned he has actually not called any of the bombing targets to express his concern to them or to give them any information. talking about former presidents. we'll talk about that. later, more on what kind of person does something like this, what motivates a bomber. we'll learn from a former top fbi profiler who joins us. we'll be right back. before discovering nexium 24hr to treat her frequent heartburn, claire could only imagine enjoying chocolate cake. now she can have her cake and eat it too. nexium 24hr stops acid before it starts for all-day, all-night protection. can you imagine 24 hours without heartburn?

for all-day, all-night protection. this is not a screensaver.game. this is the destruction of a cancer cell by the body's own immune system, thanks to medicine that didn't exist until now. and today can save your life. ♪ ♪ . what the president said at the top of the hour about today's attempted bombings is notable for what he left out.

namely, any of the intended victims. president trump, a former secretary of state, and two ex-presidents are in his words merely former high-ranking government officials. he gave no names. nothing to indicate he sees them as individual human beings and distinguished former publicer s serva servants. as two former presidents of the united states. he also made what me appears to be a first attempt at something familiar, putting the perpetrator and victim on equal footing. he also made no mention either of the bombs sent to the offices right behind me here, at cnn. it was striking and it bears repeating what he said. take a look. >> i want to begin tonight's rally by addressing the suspicious devices and packages that were mailed to current and former high-ranking government officials. my highest duty, as you know, as president, is to keep america safe. the media also has a responsibility to set a civil

tone and to stop the endless hostility and constant negative and oftentimes false attacks and stories. have to do it. have to do it. they've got to stop. >> that was the president of the united states tonight responding to the attempted bombings that occurred today. more controversy earlier as well. the president's comments. cnn's jeff zeleny joins us now with that. so, jeff, explain what the president did and did not say today throughout the day. >> reporter: anderson, one thing the president did not say, he did not say that this was an act of domestic terrorism. that is something that the new york mayor said. it's also something republican speaker paul ryan said shortly before the president arrived there in wisconsin. he quieted down the crowd of supporters and said make no mistake, this is an act of terrorism. i tried to ask the president about that in the east room

earlier today. if he believed it was. he looked me square in the face and did not answer the question. he did not athsay that again th evening if he does or does not believe this. that's one thing he did not say. he also did not take responsibility at all for any of the heated rhetoric. tonight you could hear him spreading around the blame and talking about the media there, saying stop the hostility. what he's looking for is someone who agrees are with him. that is not in the 1 s amendmen at all. that is not our jobs, quite frankly. we did not hear the president accept any sport of responsibility for something he and his supporters do and lead. he uses the bully pulpit, has the unique ability with the bully bupulpit to set the tone here. we learned tonight exactly how he's going to do it. it's not what he said earlier today, a call for unity. >> he also said at the rally tonight that politicians should stop vilifying one another. i mean, the president has called opponents he doesn't evil.

i mean, he calls maxine waters low i.q. i mean, the idea that he is not the -- i mean, you know, you talk in h past administrations about presidents having a bully pulpit. he literally uses it as a bully pulpi pulpit. >> reporter: he does, he absolutely uses it as that. if the president decided to follow his own example tonight, and not talk about opponents in those terms, i can tell you, anderson, his rallies would be much shorter. he would not be giving e ining e speeches like the other night in houston. if he was to take that out of his speech, that's basically what his program was built on. his supporters like it. this is coming 13 days before the midterm elections. we do not know where this is going to go. no question. the president has been successful in doing one thing. undermining the credibility of the press. you could hear some of his supporters behind him there applauding him. so, you know, he, again, did not follow the example he set

earlier today that people should come together. that, to me, did not sound like a rallying speech to come together. >> i mean, he didn't even acknowledge in those remarks that cnn was sent a bomb today. and in fact, the only thing he said right about the media was that the media needs to be nicer to him, essentially. i mean -- >> reporter: exactly. >> that's incredible. righ right. >> reporter: he never went from suspicious packages, what we thought earlier, to an actual pipe bomb. also, anderson, i was very surprised to learn this evening that he did not reach out, this white house did not reach out to president obama specifically, to the former secretary of state, the former president, bill and hillary clinton. yes, they're rivals, but at times like this, sometimes you reach out. they did not update them at all. so that underscores the lack of civility, if you will, in the president's words. anderson? >> jeff zeleny, thanks very much. cnn's kaitlan collins is at the rally for us.

kaitlan, so the president seemed to at least in part blame democrats and certainly the media for what happened today. >> reporter: well, he came out, he made these remarks which we weren't sure, anderson, entirely, if he was going to address it again after addressing it for the first time at the white house earlier today. but after paul ryan came out here, scott walker, all on stage, condemning these attacks, president trump got up and that was one of the first things he said. he talked about these attacks. he called for civility. said you should settle your disagreements at the ballot box. that was one key line. but anderson, you're right, those two lines you can't ignore that trump said that those engaged in the political arena must stop treating political opponents as being morally defective. now, some critics of the president might raise questions about things he said about his political opponents. on stages like the one he's on right now behind me including on maxine waters, john brennan, those type of people as well that he's often criticized. a lot of his big targets here. another thing he did say, he

talked about the media saying they need to set the tone, they need to stop with the hostile attacks, the false attacks, and we know, anderson, from reporting on this president for two years now that that is often how he perceives any kind of negative media coverage. he thinks it's a false attack afternoon him because people are upset he's president. not because it's accurate or something he said. he essentially believes it's negative and not true, that the media is making it up. which of course isn't true. it's accurate reporting of what's going on in his white house. it was an interesting way to mention the media in a speech like that, especially after he has not acknowledged that one of those packages today was sent to a media organization that he regularly goes after. but he did use his platform, anderson, to go after these attacks once again and to say that they shouldn't happen. >> i mean, when you label the american media the enemy of the people, somebody's going to listen to that and act

accordingly to that. we'll see as this investigation continues. kaitlan collins. i hope i'm wrong. thanks very much. as we widen the conversation with our veteran team of political analysts, i just want to bring you very quickly this network's view of the kind of climate that the white house is contributing to. and i'm reading now from a statement by cnn worldwide president jeff zooker. i'm quoting, "there's a total and complete lack of understanding of the white house about the seriousness of their continued attacks on the media. the president and especially the white house press secretary should understand their words matter. thus far, they have shown no comprehension of that." that was a statement he made earlier today and can essentially be repeated after what the president just said tonight at that rally. still, no seeming comprehension. former senior obama adviser and longtime friend of the obamas, david axelrod joins us. also cnn political analyst

gloria borger and david gergen who joins me here. david, of course, served presidents in both parties including bill clinton. david gergen, i mean, you hear what president trump said tonight, did you expect him to at least acknowledge two former presidents had their lives threatened today? >> i expected far more than he did. yes, he should have acknowledged both presidents. jeff zeleny was right, he should have reached out to the former presidents, assured them of the continued help from the fbi and others and a secret service. but i think most of all, he should have taken some responsibility. he completely refused to do that. he hasn't taken an ounce of responsibility or accountability for this whole thing. i think what he needs to understand is donald trump unleashed the dogs of hatred in this country from the day he declared he was running for president and they've been snarling and barking at each other ever since. it's just inevitable. there are going to be acts of violence that grow out of that. a president's duty, he says, first duty, is to provide for

the safety of the country. how do you make the country safe here at home? you keep us together. you keep us in a civil conversation. you try to unite people. he's failing in that. if he understood it, he could completely change the tone of this country, but i'm sorry, right now, i think jeff zucker had it nailed, as did jeff zeleny, we're in a situation where president of the united states on a really important issue, when people's lives are at stake, is not stepping up to his responsibility. >> i mean, david axelrod, you know, everybody who received one of these devices, i mean, you can't ignore the fact that time and time again, this president has rhetorically gone after that person or that organization. >> didn't say that. >> and, you know, wanting john brennan's security clearance revoked. i mean, a lot of people wouldn't know who john brennan is if it wasn't for president trump putting him front and center or

maxine waters or, you know, some of these other people. >> well, there's no question about it. i mean, what is the thing that links all of these people together? it was interesting to me that the nypd said they'd already sent someone over to cnn to warn them about the possibility that a package might arrive. why? because cnn has been the target of the president's fulminations at these rallies. you know, you can't deliver homilies about unity in the oval office during the day, and then run off to rallies at night where you deliver extemporaneous j jeramiads about the evil opposition and media as the enemy of the people. anderson, let's remember, it was just a week ago that the president was exalting the fact a congressman had body slammed a reporter. if you glorify violence in your speeches, people are going to hear that. we don't know who delivered these bombs, but odds are they

were someone who's heard the president's message and acted on it. so he bears responsibility for this. he, you know, directly or indirectly influencing the climate in our country. and it's a terrible thing. we had five -- we had two former presidents, a secretary of state, a former cia director, and a congresswoman today who were almost -- threatened with assassination and you would think that that would be a bracing message for the president, but he sees political advantage in exploiting these passions and whipping them up. he thinks it's working for him headed into this election campaign. his rallies have become more and more vituprative, charges more and more as the day goes on. this is at his doorstep. >> gloria, i mean, to this exact point, understand that there's

some new reporting, some new reporting about how the white house is responding. >> yeah, our colleague, pamela brown, is reporting that the white house -- there's not white house officials saying we're not to blame. he should not be blamed for crazy things that violent people want to do. and a senior official told pam that we're not a doormat. and, you know, anderson, to what david axelrod was just saying, the president tonight said leaders must stop threatening opponents as if they're morally defecti defective. i'm old enough to remember the kavanaugh hearings when the president said that the opponents of kavanaugh were evil. he used that word, evil. is that morally defective? i would think so. and the press being the enemy of the people, crooked hillary, lyin' ted. so you have the white house coming out with a statement

saying, you know, it's not us, but this is the president of the united states. his words matter. his words echo throughout not only this country, but the world. and i don't think, you know, look at all the people who were attacked. including as david points out, you know, former secretary of state. former president, maybe another former president. somebody wanted to kill them. and this reads like a donald trump enemies list. and i was actually at that rally in miss zul oula, montana, last. president trump applauded a congressman for body slamming a reporter and he got applauded in the audience and said, you know, he's my kind of guy. what signal does that send to americans? i mean, it's not a good signal. so the white house can say not our fault, not to blame. this is the leader of the free world. or supposed to be. >> yeah. and david, david gergen, this

doesn't go anywhere better. i mean, this only devolves from here. i mean, it's, you know, multiple pipe bombs today. >> yes. >> somebody is going to get k killed. >> somebody is. we don't know how many other bombs may be out there tonight. i'm sure there are efforts being made by secret service to pin down whatever they can. this will be -- this serves as an invitation to others. he couldn't get this done. this crazy person over here, but maybe i'll try it. and maybe i'll be glorified in some way. there are crazy people out there. donald trump is not directly responsible for individual crazy people. >> sure. >> but he bears indirect responsibility and ought to acknowledge and step up to that. that's a serious, brave president would do. a man of integrity would do. >> or even acknowledge, you know what, i called people evil, i demagogued people, i made them less than human. >> he ought to calm it down. you know, if he just cooled it for a little bit, it would make a big difference. >> david axelrod, very quickly. >> i was struck by -- i was

struck by something he said to lesley stahl about why he taunted dr. ford after having said nice things about her and he said, well, we wouldn't have won if i hadn't done that. that is donald trump. he thinks that this works. he thinks he is profiting from it politically. he will stop if he believes that he will -- he isn't profiting politically from it. he is not making moral judgments here. he is not thinking about his responsibility as president. he's thinking about his needs and his -- and his benefits as a politician. that's a terrible, terrible thing right now. >> yeah. david axelrod, gloria borger, david gergen, thank you very much. there's more to cover in this hour. more on the investigation, specifically how pieces of evidence come together to make a portrait of the suspect. i want to talk with former fbi profiler. whooo! want to take your next vacation to new heights? tripadvisor now lets you book over a hundred thousand tours, attractions, and experiences in destinations around the world!

like new york! from bus tours, to breathtaking adventures, tripadvisor makes it easy to find and book amazing things to do. and you can cancel most bookings up to 24 hours in advance for a full refund. so you can make your next trip... monumental! read reviews check hotel prices book things to do tripadvisor we've hadfor a long time.is in san francisco and half-measures haven't fixed it. homelessness doesn't just hurt homeless people. it hurts all of us.

that's why we're all voting "yes" on c. the plan is paid for by corporations that just got a massive tax break. it's time for them to give back by helping all of us to fix our homeless crisis. with more affordable housing... expanded mental-health services... clean restrooms and safe shelters. vote "yes" on c. it helps all of us. given the breaking news if the last however, alone, it's not lost on anyone here a would-be bomber is still on the loose or perhaps more than one and the search for him or her or them is on. joining me now to talk about it, what's unfolding, cnn law enforcement analyst, charles ramsey. also former fbi profiler, mary o'too o'toole. so, chief ramsey, you were the d.c. police chief during the d.c. sniper attacks.

can you just explain the difficulty investigations like this can be, how long they can take, or sort of what's happening right now? >> well, i mean, they can take time. i remember back in 2002 during the d.c. sniper which ironically was october of 2002. right around this time of year. it does take time. but there's an awful lot of pressure to find out very quickly or at least as quickly as possible who's responsible so that you don't wind up in this case with anyone actually being killed because right now we're very fortunate. they found so far six devices, i believe. none of which went off. that doesn't mean there are not more out there. so there's a tremendous amount of pressure to make sure that they identify this person as quickly as possible. >> mary ellen, you profiled the unibomber, ted kaczynski. looking at how this individual or individuals sent these packages, is there anything you can tell in terms of what kind of a person it could be behind this? >> well, it would all be very

preliminary, but what becomes important is taking a look at all of those devices to see, number one, if they are forensically linked, and then number two, how are those devices put together? and are they actually functional? and are they functional to become lethal? and what that will show is the . e person's -- you heard people over the last 24 hours talk about a cig csignature in this. that means how does he crimp the wires, how does he apply the powder? that becomes important and tells us something as well. and here's the final thing that i think is really important. looking at the package for the one that went to cnn in new york, there was an awful lot of tape on there. there were six stamps. and then there was the envelope that had to be connected. so there's a real good possibility that forensic

evidence is going to be obtained off of those devices. the fact that he can put together a pipe bomb does not mean that he's forensically sophisticated. if people don't realize it, even if a device explodes, you can still obtain somebody's dna off of one of the components. so that's what here is going to become so critical. so he can put it together, but it doesn't mean he's sophisticated. >> chief ramsey, can you just explain how all the law enforcement agencies actually, you know, the fbi, the nypd, would be working together behind the scenes? it's got to be an enormous undertaking. >> it is an enormous undertaking but they work together all the time. the joint terrorism task force was put together for this very reason. so you'll have members of the nypd, members of atf, you'll have the fbi. you'll have all of the law enforcement agencies that need

to be part of this investigation working seamlessly together. not only that, they're reaching out to law enforcement agencies across the country, jttfs across the country, to make everybody aware. remember, we got the midterm elections. you got a lot of very heated campaigns going on now around the country. everyone needs to be very sensitive to this, and paying very close attention to any packages that they may receive because this thing isn't over yet until that person is in custody and we can rest assured that any packages that still may be out there have been recovered. >> yeah. chief ramsey, mary ellen o'to e o'toole, i appreciate your expertise tonight, especially tonight. thank you. joining us now is former director of national intention, james clapper. he's foa former colleague of jo brennan's and a fellow verbal target, rhetorical target of the president from time to time. director clapper, as someone who's also born the brunt of the president's attacks, what went

through your mind as you watched these events unfold today? >> well, obviously, very disturbing that we reached this point and it's frankly, on one hand, disturbing, but at the same time, really not terribly surprising. just given the uncivil state of political discourse in this country, i figured it's a question of time before something like this would happen. fortunately, to this point, there have been no loss of life or injury. >> i'm wondering, i don't know if you heard the president's remarks at the beginning of this broadcast and when he's speaking at that rally. not even mentioning that two former presidents could have been killed today. that a former secretary of state. he just described former government officials. no mention of media organization

being targeted. just that the media needs to be nicer in their reporting of him. >> well, i was -- it's not the first time. i'm very disappointed. i really, in the first instance, question the appropriateness of even staging this rally. on a day like today with attempts to murder. that's what it is. two former presidents and other officials and, of course, what is an attack on the media. and so i couldn't help but fantasize and that's all it is, the president canceled the rally and given a straightforward and statesmanlike address to the nation from the oval office. and acknowledge his

responsibility and his part in this very negative discourse, the result of which, i think, is inevitable. and it's almost as though he is completely outside this and bears no responsibility for it and i'm just extremely disappointed. >> i heard you say earlier that you had a conversation, i think it was with the former head of your security detail today. can you say what precautions s you've had to take in the wake of this news, or have you? >> i'm sorry, anderson, i didn't hear the question. can you repeat it? >> are you taking precautions in the wake of what we saw today? >> yes, absolutely. my wife and i were traveling today, so first when i started hearing these reports and i got

e-mails from people saying, you know, you're a potential target as well, and i called our next-door neighbor whom we're very close to who normally take care of our mail for us. and it was very disconcerting to have to tell her, hey, be careful. in fact, you may just want to avoid our mailbox. and that was actually very disturbing to me to have to do that. so, yes, we're taking precautions. >> james clapper, i appreciate talking to you. thank you very much. we got some breaking news right now with josh campbell. i want to go to him. josh, what are you learning? >> reporter: anderson, our law enforcement sources are telling myself and colleague there's a new development into the ongoing investigation of the missing packages. it involves former president joe biden. we're not sure if the specific

device i'm about to describe, or package, rather, is actually connected to the serious es of packages we saw today. what law enforcement sources are telling us, as we speak, officials are trying to track down a package that was originally addressed to an old address of the former vice president in delaware. now, the package was apparently returned to sender. it didn't really alert officials at that point as being suspicious, but after the developments today, obviously became of interest. and whether it was a witness that called the police, or it was some type of electronic detection that alerted them to this package that was out there. we still don't know. but we're told that right now, law enforcement officials are trying to track down this package due to what they're describing possibly similarities in the description of the packages sent today and, again, this package that was addressed to former vice president joe biden. so it's very much an effort, all hands on deck by law enforcement officers to determine if this package does contain a device similar to what we've seen. it does have a description enough that has alerted to them to, you know, obviously move

forward in a concerted effort to try to identify it. we'll continue to ping our sources and bring you further developments, anderson. >> all right. josh, we'll continue to follow this very closely. josh campbell. i appreciate that breaking news. we're going to take a short break. up next, more on what the pieces of the bombs uncovered so far may reveal. we saved hundreds on our car insurance when we switched to geico. this is how it made me feel. it was like that feeling when you're mowing the lawn on a sunny day... ...and without even trying, you end up with one last strip that's exactly the width of your mower.

when you're done, it looks so good you post a picture on social media. and it gets 127 likes. geico. fifteen minutes could save you fifteen percent or more on car insurance.

monitor their blood glucose every day. which means they have to stop. and stick their fingers. repeatedly. today, life-changing technology from abbott makes it possible to track glucose levels. without drawing a drop of blood, again and again. the most personal technology, is technology with the power to change your life. life. to the fullest. we have more on the breaking news, that josh campbell just brought us right before the break, to tell you about law enforcement officials are trying to track down a package addressed to former vice president joe biden. now considered suspicious because of similarities to other packages. the package was misaddressed and

returned to cinder. it was not clear if the return address was debbie wasserman-schultz or some other address. a former counter terrorism agent at the state department joins us, also, rick deloria. when you look at these new x-ray photos of the device, i'm wondering what you see and what stands out to you from what we've learned so far? >> good evening anderson. a pleasure to be with you tonight. the investigators will be looking for similarities between the bombs. what fragments may be inside the bombs, and what the similarities are. i'm sure once an initial assessment of the bombs has been made, they'll be on a plane to quantico, virginia. >> how true is it -- everyone

talks about a signature the bomb makers have? is that universally true, that every bomb maker has a signature? >> i believe the fbi lab at quantico has a database to look for any connections. and i have great faith that the fbi analysts and agents and executives at the lab will do a great job in pulling this all together. >>. >> what does it tell you? i mean, the fact that they didn't detonate. that's obviously going to help investigators in terms of, with the sheer number of potential clues. >> it certainly will, anderson. >> sorry, go ahead. >> it certainly will, the fact that it didn't detonate to me, is fascinating, it could be a firing train malfunction there. or the actual intent could be nothing more than panic and fear. and the bomb maker possibly is watching to see what the next

move might be on law enforcement's part, very similar to what we saw unfold here in austin, texas, not too long ago. where the bomb maker adjusted his plans and targeting an m.o., predicated on the news coverage. >> how much of a concern are copycat attacks. it's something we always think about when reporting on some like this. how often does that happen. >> there are various manuals on the internet that show how to make bombs. and what the investigators are looking for is what inspired this individual or individuals to try to commit these hain ouls acts. what inspired them, we know the al awacky's inspired the internet sites. they will be looking for that as well as technical clues and forensic clues in the bombs

themselves. >> i think it was you who tweeted earlier today, envelopes, packages, ieds are a treasure trove of forensics. what else can investigators determine from the packaging that was sent at the device. >> the amount of forensics are unbelievable. you look at chase evidence, how wires are crimped and cut, that traditional signature like you will see with all bomb makers. the other aspect here i heard nobody talk about is, there's no doubt in my mind coming from the protective intelligence field that this individual is known to the u.s. authorities. he's in their databases. >> that's fascinating. >> there's handwriting analysis as well, there's handwriting evidence with misspellings. i appreciate your expertise. the news continues with cuomo prime time right after this short break. hey guys, up there. ...or to laugh out loud.

♪ but when it matters most, you count on tracfone to keep you connected for less. ♪ our smartphone plan gives you talk, text and data with unlimited carryover starting at $15 a month, no contract. all with nationwide 4g lte coverage. get top smartphones or bring your own phone. tracfone. for moments that matter.

i'm chris cuomo, welcome to prime time. it's good to have you with us, this has been an important day. someone tried to terrorize us today. to target the people that the president doesn't like, and it was a moment that meant a lot on different levels and certainly gave us pause. it's a moment that should make us