>> sickening trend. we'll continue to follow, of course. before we go, i want to take a moment to remember the sacrifices those known and those not known made by the men and the women of the military who defended our country and protected our freedoms for generations. veterans, we honor you. to those who've made the ultimate sacrifice, we remember you, thank you for your service. we are forever grateful. never forget. the news continues. i want to hand it over to chris for "cuomo primetime." chris? >> beautifully said, anderson, thank you for that. i am chris cuomo. welcome to "primetime", everybody. another key race was just called. not good news for republicans. meanwhile, the florida recount is getting ugly, may get worse. what is true? what is trite? we don't need more opinions from pundits about what might be going on. we need the players and have them on both sides making their cases directly to you. what are their issues? what proof do they have of the same? then you decide. the president has weighed in. is he really proposing breaking

the law in two different states? facts first. straight ahead. and this story, this photo blowing up online. what the heck are these high school boys doing? a nazi salute with a black classmate in attendance? and also as veterans -- as anderson just reminded us, it's veterans day. thank you. we will never forget. tonight's show is in your honor. we have a special closing tonight that you're not going to want to miss. there's only way to start the week, my friends. let's get after it. all right. there's just been another concession as i said. democrats picked up a seat in the united states senate. in arizona. republican martha mcsally just conceded the race to democrat kyrsten sinema. here's some sound. >> everybody, i just called kyrsten sinema and congratulated her on becoming arizona's first female senator after a hard-fought battle. i wish her success as she rests arizona in the senate.

>> mcsally handled it with dignity. dog seemed okay with it as well. sinema is the first woman to represent arizona in the senate. we'll have more on that milestone in a moment. first let's get to florida. the recount fight has gotten toxic, in fact, the judge in one of the ongoing legal fights told both sides to tone it down. why? well, despite all the talk from people you're supposed to be able to trust, there is no proof of real fraud. that doesn't mean that there are not counting issues and legitimate concerns. tonight, we're going to test both camps that are going on in this ongoing counting, you know, situation. let's begin with brad todd, a senior adviser to the rick scott campaign. i didn't want to condemn the entire process, but look, it's always frustrating when we see the sausage being made. i want to ask you, do you agree with the judge, enough with the fraud talk? it should be open, it should be transparent, you should count every vote that legally should

be counted. save the implications until you have proof of the same. >> well, in the case you referenced today in broward county, the judge also agreed with the rick scott campaign that the ballots needed to be more secure. he's requested three more sheriff's deputies be assigned to the ballots when they're not being used in the recount which was really the remedy we were seeking. and so i -- >> you were asking to impound the machines. you also asked for more security. the judge said you go come up with a plan, you said we want more deputies. you already had people watching them. in fact, you had people there in advance of the voting in broward county. the democrat side, rick scott and senator nelson's side, agreed to this remedy. fair points? >> that's fair point, but chris, you know, the real problem in broward county here is that the county election supervisor, brenda snipes, has not complied with the law. we have these laws in place to prevent fraud. when you don't comply with the law, we can't be certain there is no fraud. >> she wasn't complying then the judge told her she had to.

she missed the initial deadline to do so last friday at 7:00 but then comply. you looked at it, it actually -- >> wait a minute, chris. wait a minute, chris. tuesday night, she's supposed to issue a count of how many votes she has left to count. >> right. >> she can still -- by the way, many other states you have to actually have those early votes already counted by the time the election ends at 8:00. she merely has to tell us how many she had. >> right. >> the numbers she gave us she did not abide by. she continued to find 70,000 votes over the next few days. >> right. >> you can't find votes. that's her entire job. she has two years to prepare for this, to be in position to tell us how many votes there are to be cast. >> i hear you on that. >> that's concerning. >> i have a question for you, actually i have two on this. one is, just to be clear, what that democrat -- let's call her that. >> she was elected. >> she is. she was also asked to start the job by governor bush. >> correct. >> she's been on there with governor scott for eight years. if he really had a problem, he could have asked her -- she's got to be elected. he could have suspended her if he wanted to.

he chose not to. the case was about conspiracy, not fraud. the judge didn't find any fraud. no allegation that was credible about fraud. it's about transparency. that matters as well. i want to be clear about it. >> no, chris, the reason we have that law if place, the reason you have to tell us exactly how many more ballots there are to be cast, is so we can make sure you don't add some after you find out -- >> i totally hear it. i totally hear it. >> that's a very important law to abide by. >> 100%. >> she did not abide by it. >> it's also referenced in your constitution. so there's no question that it is a really important mandate and it needed to be adhered to. you went to court. you won. i have another question, though. she found more votes. all right. let's put that into the true context. all right? voting is sloppy. it's certainly sloppy in your state. it doesn't matter what kind of upgrades we do, we know that anywhere you look, anywhere in this country, if a race is close, you're not going to love the process. but there's something that i

keep hearing that i don't know how legitimate it is. we should count every vote. we should count every vote. every legal vote, i want counted. got to be full clear, open. so now you're saying they're slow, there are real legal legitimate votes that they have. they may not make their deadline, but they are real legal, legitimate votes and you're saying don't count them? >> i'm saying you don't know what votes were delivered to the elections office by the time the polls close, and if any of those votes were added at a later time. you don't know that because she had not abided by the laws that are designed to prevent fraud. she also, by the way, brenda snipes admitted on television she co-mingled ballots that were invalid and potentially fraudulent -- >> potentially. >> they'd been deemed invalid and potentially fraudulent by the canvassing board. she co-mingled -- >> not potentially -- she has a hard date. she gets the date. i respect the date. >> wait a minute. she admitted she co-mingled them and said it was my decision. she counted ballots. >> she said it was a mistake.

>> she knew at the time that she put them in the bucket with the legal votes they were not legal. >> i have not seen anywhere that she or any county commissioner has admitted to wrongfully and intentionally co-mingling votes. i don't think you have, either. i just don't think you need to put a fraudulent spin on things. it's bad enough as it is. there's going to be a lack of faith in this outcome regardless. >> well, chris -- >> then we still have to see what the governor does about it. >> question certainly ought to have a little lack of faith in brenda snipes. a judge already found her guilty of destroying ballots illegally. >> true. >> she has a history of poor administration of elections in broward county. >> not in this race -- the people keep electing her. >> tonight on anderson cooper's show earlier, a democrat from broward county refused to say that he would fully support her continuing in that job. that tells you that she has proven that she's not quite capable, not quite up to this job, and her entire job performing that job --

>> why didn't governor scott make a move on her and suspend her? >> governor scott takes his responsibility on honoring the will of the voters very seriously. that is not a step any governor should take hastily. he did send monitors to broward county. he tried to surround the situation. no governor should immediately willy-nilly overturn the will of the voters of the state. >> you say that -- >> you have to absolve her -- >> you say that. hold on a second. you say that and got some high ground given where she is and her past. no question. you're projecting the past onto the present. before we put a halo on the governor's head, he came out with allegations of fraud, he didn't have a damn bit of proof. he told the florida law enforcement people to look at it. they went to the secretary of state who's a republican, and he said, i have no specific allegation for you to look at. so these are all republicans. the florida law enforcement goes, they say, we have nothing to look at. they reconfirm that this weekend. no halo for the governor on this. he said there was fraud, it was trying to be stolen from him, that there was cheating. you can't prove any of that.

>> chris, the reason we have anti-fraud laws is to make sure fraud doesn't happen. when you don't abide by the anti-fraud laws, that's how fraud happens. >> that's different than saying there is fraud. you have to have proof to say there is fraud. you want transparency, otherwise there's a chance of fraud. but you can't say there is fraud -- >> we want you to abide by the laws that are designed to prevent fraud. it's that simple. she has two years to get ready for this. it is not a complicated job to be supervisor of elections. she's an experienced supervisor. >> i got you. >> she's been through many elections. >> i'm not saying she did the job well. i'm saying let's assume she didn't do the job well. let's say she didn't. let's say the job's not being done well. you now have the canvassing board there which includes local judges so if you take away confidence in the process from this point forward, you're taking away confidence from these judges and this canvassing board as well. you don't want to do that, i'm sure. you now have your monitors there. it's been added to by the judge today. so now you have eyeballs on it. but what i'm saying is, don't say there's fraud when you can't

show there is fraud. >> let's talk about the fraud the democrats are trying to commit out in the open. right now, a lawyer for the democratic side on this, he is asking the state of florida to overturn the florida procedures for verifying absentee ballots. >> yes. >> now, that's fraud in the open. he's asking for them to count ballots that canvassing boards have already deemed invalid or fraudulent. >> right. >> and that is the -- by the way, it's the same lawyer who two years ago objected to this process. the florida law. >> right. >> during the hillary clinton campaign. he was -- >> do you have a legal right to appeal the decisions of the canvassing board? >> you do, but he -- >> all right. >> hold on. >> how is that -- >> hold on, chris. he went to court during the 2016 election. >> right. >> he objected to florida's absentee ballot verification laws. >> right. >> the judge in the case, an appointee of obama, judge walker, gave him the remedy he sought. florida abided by that. the legislature in a bipartisan and unanimous fashion -- >> right. >> -- codified his answer.

they put his procedures in place from that case. >> right. >> those are the procedures we have followed -- >> he says they weren't followed. that's the whole point of the law. >> those are the procedures that we have followed. >> i understand. their argument of the lawsuit is you're not handling them uniformly in different counties. >> he has had 16 -- that was going to always be the case after the judge's order and in the statute. he doesn't like the statute that he asks for. >> right. can't argue it both ways. it's that you're admitting they don't do it uniformly and well and you're saying, well, this is the rule he asked for. he's asking for a further modification because it's still not done well. >> he waited to see whether his side won or loss before he decided which side he'd be on in the lawsuit. >> he doesn't have the right to create that kind of lawsuit and get the rule right. >> it's wrong for bill nelson to try to overturn the will of florida's voters. you know what's going to happen on thursday, on thursday at 3:00, this machine recount's going to end. rick scott is going to be ahead. still the will of the florida voters to send him to the senate. >> maybe. maybe. he's up, like, 12,000 votes.

>> bill nelson is going to have to decide, does he want to end his career paying legal bills as a sore loser or does he want to go out as someone who dignifies and respects -- >> if politicians didn't pay lawyers when things were tight and they had fights to make, none of you guys would be anywhere. what i'm saying is this, you talk about having to make a decision, the governor has a decision to make. he is supposed to certify, i believe it's him and one or two members of the legislature have to certify these results. at some point in the future. is he going to do that or will he recuse himself because of his own conflict in this? >> the governor respects the process. he respects the law. >> even if he loses? >> he has only asked that the law be followed in florida. that is his job. >> what if he loses? >> governor scott has always been someone who's abided by the law. he's not going to lose unless they steal it from him in court. >> what if he loses and he thinks they stole it from him -- >> it's the will of the florida voters that he be elected senator. it's been done in the count -- >> i hear that. i heard what the president said.

the president says you should have stopped counting on election night. imagine if that had happened. you wouldn't know who won the race. we wouldn't have any idea who won this race if you stopped counting on election night because you know those are all raw estimates and people don't even have their ballots in hand. that's the president. you don't have to answer for him tonight. >> in florida, you continue to count the ballots you announce on election night and the days following. >> that's exactly right and it's like that in most states. you'd think the president would know that, but, again, he's not on your tab tonight. the president is -- he speaks for himself. the governor is going to have to decide whether or not he certifies this because if he has the position you're outlining right now, if they tell him, hey, they won their lawsuit, we have to review these signatures, it turns back -- we contacted the people and they verified that these are their ballots, we're going to count them. if he were to lose and he thought it was unfair, would he still certify the results? >> chris, the governor is going to be the senator. he is focused right now on what he needs to do for the people of florida in washington. he's won this election fair and square. he's going to win the recount.

it's the question that's only in senator nelson's court. is he going to abide by the will of the voters -- >> they both are going to have to deal with the moment when they're going to have to accept results they may not like. that's why i'm asking you. i'll give you the spin tonight on it because we're still early in the process. we'll talk about this again. you're invited back. give our best to the governor. >> i will. >> may the man with the most votes win. and i look forward to having you back. >> thanks a lot, chris. >> all right. be well. that's brad todd. he represents governor scott. this is going to be an ongoing process and, again, the governor at the end of it, he's got to certify the results under florida state law. what happens there. all right. let's take a little breather then the other side. an attorney representing florida's democratic party, he's a veteran of that 2000 infamous ballot showdown. can he defend the complaints about democratic officials and the counting? next. at t-mobile, forty bucks gets you an unlimited plan and a new samsung galaxy s9 included for every line. this is what you get with your $40 plan at verizon.

recap! with t-mobile, you get this: four lines four phones for forty bucks. with verizon, you get this... the choice just got a whole lot more obvious. get more because you deserve it. only at t-mobile. for just fifteen ninety-nine at red lobster. you get all the shrimp you want, any way you want them. and now savory parmesan shrimp scampi is back! new sesame-ginger shrimp is here, too. but hurry in, endless shrimp ends november eighteenth. douglas! we're running dangerously low on beans. people love your beans, doug. they love 'em. doooooooooug! you want to go sell some tacos? progressive knows small business makes big demands. doug, where do we get a replacement chili pepper bulb?

so we'll design the insurance solution that fits your business. it's a very niche bulb. it's a specialty bulb. that fits your business. mopping robotthe from irobot. its precision jet spray and vibrating cleaning head loosen and scrub stains. all while navigating kitchens, bathrooms and those hard to reach places. you and braava jet from irobot. better together. you're still here? we're voya! we stay with you to and through retirement. i get that voya is with me through retirement, i'm just surprised it means in my kitchen. so, that means no breakfast? voya. helping you to and through retirement.

hi susan!hs) honey? i respect that. but that cough looks pretty bad... try this new robitussin honey. the real honey you love... plus the powerful cough relief you need. mind if i root through your trash? new robitussin honey. because it's never just a cough. no matter how many times the president tweets or speaks about election fraud in florida, just know this. there is no proof. a judge said it today. the secretary of state has said it. florida law enforcement has said they haven't been asked to investigate any specific allegation. all right? the secretary of state is a republican. just know that. my next guest is in the thick of all of this going on. he is on the democratic side. he was a special counsel during 2000. he is now special counsel to the florida state democratic party.

his name is mitchell berger. sir, good to have you on the show. >> wonderful to be here. thank you for having me. >> all right. so the mainline allegation is this. that your opponent can sustain. boy, does this democrat in charge of broward county stink a the her job. she can't get anything done on time. she co-mingled ballots. she wouldn't abide by the law of transparency. she made them have to go to court. she's doing a sloppy job and now we have doubts about her accuracy. >> okay. well, look, the lawsuit that was won against the supervisor of elections was a public records request. she was given 24 hours to comply while at the same time everyone was asking her to count the ballots. to say that she is -- we would prefer more efficiency is absolutely correct, but she's still got all of her votes counted before phoenix got their votes counted.

no one is condemning phoenix for the orderly process they went through. in urban areas, you have trouble when there are extra votes. we had about a 20% higher turnout than was expected. we don't put the budgets in to help. that doesn't mean that she shouldn't be doing it more competently and efficiently, but it does mean there is no fraud. i was in front of the canvassing board yesterday and i said after coming out of testing the machines with my republican colleague that everyone is working hard, everyone is doing a good job. while we'd prefer for it to be moor efficient, neither my republican colleague nor i who inspected the machines found any fraud. >> all right. >> it is dangerous -- it is dangerous to the process to constantly say the system isn't working. >> no, understood. >> it is. >> understood. you need to have confidence in the system. that comes through efficiency

and finding ballots that weren't supposed to be co-mingled that were co-mingled hurts the confidence in the process. and now we're hearing that they may not have all the votes counted -- >> that was -- >> -- this time. >> that was 22 ballots. i'd like to have that efficiency in my checkbook every year. it was 22 ballots. >> i don't know. i don't know that it's that casual a thing. if there are 22, how many did they not find? that's the problem with inaccuracy. >> well, no, i appreciate that, but -- but the real reason fraud is being talked about in broward county is a precursor to have an argument that went the 25,000 under-votes if broward county -- >> under-votes are those where people filled out ballots but didn't vote in every race they were supposed to. it's called an under-vote. an over-vote, they voted twice in one race. those are ballots that may be examined in certain recount situations. go ahead.

>> correct. so in the machine recount, during a machine recount phase, the under-votes, if the machines weren't calibrated correctly, the under-votes are going to be counted. in broward county in a particular area, 25,000 people did not vote for the united states senate who voted in the governors race. >> right. >> that's an anomaly that's hard to explain. so the governor's people are constantly picking on broward county and saying, fraud, fraud, fraud, because they are concerned at the 25,000 votes turnout to be correctly voted when the machine recount is completed, they want to have something to say about those votes. and the only thing they're going to be able to say other than if the votes are legitimate and come through bill nelson's way is that they were created by fraud. and why discredit the system? why do that when all we need to

do is calmly and succinctly do a machine recount, which is required by law? >> that is what's going to happen, and we're going to monitor it and we're going to watch it and we're going to test it. i'm going to bring you back and we're going to discuss the issues as we move forward. >> thank you. >> all right. counselor mitchell berger, thank you very much. appreciate it. the way you got to do it, you got to hear from both sides, what they're putting out there not just theories about what's going on and feelings about it because you've been there before. let them make the case to you. let's see how the facts fall on the bones on both sides. we'll go from there. so, you know, you're going to hear this mud slinging. you've been hearing it on tv all day. you're going to hear it for days to come. the facts in florida. i threw a lot of information at you there. let's do a facts first. we're going to lay out everything that needs to happen and when. next. this is big! t-mobile is offering the awesome iphone xr with an unlimited plan for just $40 bucks a month. unlimited. with the new iphone xr?! yeah, iphone xr included.

for $40 bucks?! that is big. at booking.com, we can't guarantee you'll good at that water jet thingy... but we can guarantee the best price on this hotel. or any accommodation, from homes to yurts. booking.com booking.yeah

so, let's talk about conference calls. there's always a certain amount of fumbling. a lot of times it doesn't work. we have problems. comcast business goes beyond fast. by letting you make and receive calls from any device using your business line. and conference calls you can join without any dial-ins or pins. (phone) there are currently 3 members in this conference. i like that. i like that too. i would use that in a heartbeat. get started with innovative voice solutions for a low price when you get fast, reliable internet. comcast business. beyond fast. all right. this big news about what just happened in arizona gives us a different perspective than what we had on election night. 51-47. the runoff in mississippi and what's happening in florida. even if both of those go to the republicans, you wind up having

a 53-47. they will have netted two seat. they picked up two seats. think about it. the president's getting all these pats on the back that he won, too, and got his base out. manchin won in west virginia, right? that place is all trump, all the time. tester won in montana. all trump all the time. in arizona, that was jeff flake's seat. they should have been able to keep it and didn't. so as this story has evolved since last tuesday, it's not looking as good as it was for the president. 53-47. look, that's a much easier passage point for them the next time a judge comes up if it's on his watch. remember this, the map worked to their advantage in the senate this time on the republican side. in 2020, it worked to the democratic side. so good they get some those seats back, maybe/maybe not. it's a long way away. that's arizona. let's turn to florida. officials are racing to finish a recount into three statewide races if florida. senate, governor and agriculture commissioner. here's what you need to know and watch for. 3:00 p.m., all right?

3:00 p.m. thursday, thursday is going to be a big day. state law mandates that all 67 counties have to have their votes counted. 8.5 million votes. it's a big population surge in florida. can they handle it? seems, no. and they're going to have to recount, get it done, give it to the secretary of state. all right? all of these races are going through this recount because they're within .5%. that's the state law that triggers an automatic machine recount. now you heard the argument. in the senate race, hold on a second, what if in broward county, you do have these votes that the machine miscalibrated. if they can show that and it goes through and scott can't stop it legally, you could have a change there. other than that, 12,000 votes, even out of 8 million, that's not easy to overcome. all right. now, if any of these recount results, though, go from .5% to .25% or less, then you get a hand recount. more time, but more exacting, right? i know. machines are supposed to be

better. not when it comes to voting. they want to do it by hand. look at all the different ballots especially with the mind on two things. under-votes and over-votes. what are those? they are ballots in which voters either didn't pick a candidate for every race, okay, or over-votes is when they choose more than a candidate in a race. the under-votes are the ones the democrats are playing to right now and saying maybe the machine got it wrong. did that come up in 2000? it did, but it wound up going to the supreme court. we know what happens. all right. so it seems pretty straightforward, but here's the problem. many are wondering why is florida so bad at this? 2000 all over again. not really. okay? here's why. some perspective. you show me the state. we're in a tight race. when they reveal their process, it doesn't reveal a lot of warts along with it. we have a problem in the arcane way that we vote. it's just true. you know, it's, look, it's important -- it's an important part of our lives and it's the only one that has not been significantly upgraded by tech

technology. think about it. the problem in florida now as i preferred to earlier is volume. these deadlines were put if place when florida's vote pool was about 5 million. this thursday, they're going to have to count 8.5 million votes. it's a lot more votes. they don't have more staff. they don't have different budgets. you don't have the manpower. you're going to get caught short. that's what's going on. you have more ballots on the way, all right? this is something important. one of the reasons the president got pushed back so aggressively is not only because it's absurd to say that the voting should have been over on election day, they don't count all the votes then. those are estimates that come in in almost every state. especially in states sometimes where it's like by pail. mail. they could have never done it. if you stopped then, you would have totally gypped overseas and military ballots because they're due later under law so you couldn't have stopped on tuesday. would have been unfair to the men and women fighting for our freedom somewhere else right now. the counties are going to have to submit their final returns by this sunday. the state is set to certify the election results by next tuesday, november 20th.

so thursday, then the weekend, then the 20th. okay? those are the big dates. the big date on the 20th is going to be a really big deal. i'll tell you why. there are lots of problems. you got the palm beach county supervisor coughing up the issue to old machines. you saw that argued for you tonight. the only recount that might be done in time is the senate race. lawsuits are mounting. the governor is a candidate in the close senate race and also has to certify the results on november 20th. what happens if he doesn't like the result, what if he decides he doesn't want to certify them? the democrats sued him to recuse himself given the conflict. will they win? some 20,000 provisional and mail-in ballots are also at stake. there's a hearing this wednesday to determine whether those votes will count. the law says that they can't, but you have the right to appeal. will they win? we'll see. so, now, the last point, you've got the governor his republican supporters and even the president have made allegations of fraud without proof.

see what happens when i test them on that. they don't have the proof. we say we suspect there could be fraud because the transparency wasn't in place. that's different than saying there is fraud. you have to be able to show it. we only know what you can show. so, just think about it. it's the governor's race, the senate race and also the agriculture commissioner, so what does that mean that the fix was in so deep by democrats in a republican-led state that they even fixed the agriculture commissioner race? does that sound compelling? now, none of that stopped the president. he loves making up voter fraud and he went the farthest saying the election should be decided by the votes tallied last tuesday. no state had a real tally last tuesday. just know that. okay? yes, he's the president, yes, you got to respect the office but don't have to respect everything he says because a lot of it is just bogus and this is one point of proof of that. all right? the process never ends on election day. by law anywhere. the president is dead wrong, again.

facts first. all right? so trump is now trying to raise money off his fact-free claim that the elections are being stolen. what do you think about that? stolen or legit? you really want to put democracy to that kind of test? let's put it to the test in a great debate, next.

to our great debaters, jennifer granholm and ken cuccinelli. let's see if we can start out on a point of mutual agreement. does anybody agree that the election should have ended last tuesday and all counting stopped on that day?

do we all agree that is an absurd notion? yes, yes, yes? good. we'll move on. ken, i'll give you silence as acceptance. >> if all the ballots are there. >> they're not all there, though. that's the point. the president was not over his skis or looking to create chaos instead of consensus. all right. let's talk about the matters at hand. in florida, jennifer granholm, you democrats are sloppy, you're sloppy in charge of that broward county. >> hey, don't broad brush all of us. >> palm beach. all with the same brush. you represent them all today. good for you. so do they have a point that there was a lack of transparency? they had to sue to get information they should have had under law and there is a right and a right reason for republicans to be worried about the authenticity of the votes? >> i think that they are right in that it must be transparent, but as you pointed out, this is not about -- that is not fraudulent. that she couldn't get it out in time is not -- does not mean

that there are improperly cast ballots or ballots that are being miscounted or added. and that is a huge difference. a mistake or an inability to abide by it because of the speed of which -- with which the law requires is totally different than saying that there's corruption, that votes are being stolen, that there is fraud. that, to me, is beyond the pale. this president is cutting the legs out from under our election system overall by casting doubt on this, and, hey, isn't that why we're doing a recount to begin with? the recount has a republican and a democrat looking at every vote. you got to take anything to a judge. it is all transparent. it's being watched. that's why we should let every vote be counted and then accept the results. >> like the judge said today, relax, ken. you guys, enough with the fraud talk. tone it down. let's see what happens. >> yeah, look, let's talk about

this in terms of justice. as we do the court system. there are two elements to it. there's being right and the -- and everyone else on the outside having confidence that the conclusion is right. of course, we want the right vote count, but the way this has unfolded, as jennifer just said, you know, it encourages a certain lack of confidence to say the least. the president certainly has jumped on that, but the lack of transparency in violation of their own laws -- >> he's gone beyond that -- >> by a person who has a track record of that, creates real doubt. >> she's an easy target. >> in an environment like we live in today -- let me finish, chris. >> go ahead. >> in an environment like we live today, that kind of doubt is viewed on the other side as negatively as it can be and that shouldn't surprise anyone. >> well, but that doesn't make it responsible, especially from a governor and a sitting president. right? it's one thing to say, hey, the transparency's off, ken. they should have been better, they went to court, she lost,

good on them for bringing the suit. governor scott said there is fraud. the democrats are cheating and trying to steal the election. he has no proof of any of that. the president went even farther. in truth, i don't want to entertain what the president said. i don't like that this day has come, but he is so ridiculous in what he said. he has so little basis for it that it's not really worth our time. so, ken, i get you on the transparency. 100%. i get you on wanting the monitors and more monitors. 100%. but you said there was fraud. >> well, and obeying the law. >> you have no proof. >> and obeying the law. >> that is not proof of fraud. >> right. but you're zeroing in on the loss of confidence just to lack of transparency, but there's more than that. there's violation of their own law. there's a court ruling against them so far. and this is an office that has a track record of this sort of -- >> all understood and granted, i'm just saying, jennifer, that it's one thing -- everything ken just said it true. it's all true, but they said something else. they said, and, therefore, there is fraud, and they are stealing

votes and they are cheating and trying to win the election. we've seen no proof of any of that. >> right. i mean, talk about undermining confidence in the election system, ken. you've got now a judge who's a republican judge, this morning, who said there is no proof of fraud. you've got the elections division saying in florida those are appointed by rick scott, there is no proof of fraud. even in arizona, the president was saying the same thing. their elections managers are saying there is no proof of fraud. so what you have is a president who is trying to undermine confidence in the electoral system and what if rick scott wins? what if -- what does that mean? so he ends up winning and the president has completely trashed florida's -- >> so we end up -- >> -- election system and have people wondering whether he's legitimately there. >> ken? >> we had him do this on election night in 2016 in the run-up to it and he sat in the same result except it was his

own election and here it's -- here it's florida now, and florida inevitably, we're going to be looking at florida two years from now in the next presidential election as well, and yet we see competency issues that the whole country has seen for a long time in florida that are the responsibility interestingly enough -- >> only because we examine it. >> more of local officials in florida than, say, where i live in virginia. >> i bet you if we looked at virginia -- >> that's right because they're continually at the point of the folkram, chris. >> right. >> constitution does give primary responsibility for elections to states. >> no question. >> florida keeps falling down on the job here. >> i think it's also they get examined because they're so important. >> i'm not arguing against a recount. i've had them myself. >> they may have two. look, in virginia, if tim kaine hadn't been running against a bigot, and the race has been really close, we started looking at virginia's tally down there,

i bet you would have seen it as well. i think it's a function of examination, not of anything endemic to florida. look, all of us are voting in arcane systems. technology rules our laws everywhere -- >> yes. >> -- except when it comes to the franchise, which is odd. you know, just to give one -- >> chris, they're not all arcane systems. they're not. >> who votes online? >> they're good reliable systems that count quickly. >> who votes online? >> nobody. >> nobody. >> that's my point. that's where you pay your mortgage. that's where all your money is. it's all digitized. you haven't seen a stack of whatever you've been able to -- you know, to put together. we all trust everything to online services, but not this. that's all i'm saying. >> preach it. preach it. i love that. >> no, look, i know we have -- >> we have technology -- >> i know. i know. people say no way, but it's okay for all of our banking. it's okay for the fed. it's okay for the treasury. you know, they have their gold back. >> not our elections. >> they're doing so much online. not our election. fine. conversation for another day. but just imagine, you know, when it comes to confidence, ken and

gov, jennifer, i'm glad that we started on this, you know, the president came out, i know he likes to swing big. i know that voter fraud is ripe for the picking because people already don't trust the process 100% and with good reason to a certain extent. for him to say in arizona it should have ended on tuesday, they vote by mail, ken. they vote by mail. you would have three quarters of -- >> three quarters of them vote by mail. yeah, three quarters of them vote by mail in arizona. i don't like that. i don't appreciate it, but that's their system. >> do you appreciate him being so grossly incorrect in what his remedy was for this situation? >> back to my earlier, where there's correct and the appearance of being correct, first of all, i appreciate being correct. and mcsally obviously conceded today. >> yes. >> because she's comfortable with the way the process has gone. >> right. >> and really, she's the ultimate judge of her own race. >> true. >> i think we need to accept that.

and i agree with you about the comments that are really out of bounds under the circumstances. i will tell you, i was a person who watched that count roll in. and then immediately started making calls into arizona. why did this stop? and they did have some hang-ups. they're within the boundaries of their own -- >> 100%. >> -- law. >> i'm just saying -- >> 100% as far as i know and that gives you a lot more confidence in the final outcome. >> well, look, you know what gives confidence? confidence gives confidence. don't knock it. don't say there's fraud. don't say there's bad things. let the process play out. ken, jennifer, thank you very much. and you know, they're not just -- they're good on tv. ken was an a.g., jennifer was a governor. they understand this process. >> and an a.g. >> and an a.g. thank you. of course you're better than ken. i knew that going into it. all right. >> oh! i heard that. >> a time of great concern about the rise of white nationalism in america. okay. this is real. this isn't just about what the president says or what he gives some confidence to. all right? it is real. it's on the rise and there's a photo that surfaced that demands an explanation.

a disturbing prom picture of all things, next. if your moderate to severe ulcerative colitis or crohn's symptoms are holding you back, and your current treatment hasn't worked well enough it may be time for a change. ask your doctor about entyvio®, the only biologic developed and approved just for uc and crohn's. entyvio® works at the site of inflammation in the gi tract,

and is clinically proven to help many patients achieve both symptom relief and remission. infusion and serious allergic reactions can happen during or after treatment. entyvio® may increase risk of infection, which can be serious. pml, a rare, serious, potentially fatal brain infection caused by a virus may be possible. tell your doctor if you have an infection experience frequent infections or have flu-like symptoms, or sores. liver problems can occur with entyvio®. if your uc or crohn's treatment isn't working for you, ask your gastroenterologist about entyvio®. entyvio®. relief and remission within reach. we've frozen out...out... and forgotten... by a white house and washington mired in special-interests politics. but we can take our country back with a democratic agenda for the people. that means lowering healthcare costs, increasing pay through rebuilding america, and cleaning up corruption. and it means having the strength to stand up for our values.

it's time to make washington work for the people again. omar, check this out. uh, yeah, i was calling to see if you do laser hair removal. for men. notice that my hips are off the ground. [ engine revving ] and then, i'm gonna pike my hips back into downward dog. [ rhythmic tapping ] hey, the rain stopped. -a bad day on the road still beats a good one off it.

-tell me about that dental procedure again! -i can still taste it in my mouth! -progressive helps keep you out there. -i can still taste it in my mouth! ingenious space- neat nest™ by fasaving design. so you can go from this... to this. farberware neat nest™. stacked & intact™ all right. here's the photo i wish i didn't have to show you. okay? it's from a high school in wisconsin. it's going viral. we blocked their faces for obvious reasons. it was taken last spring, it just emerged. those are dozens of high school kids giving the nazi salute. one boy even appears to flash a white power hand sign that looked kind of like an okay sign. he's dead in the middle of your screen in the first row on the bottom. the school says the photo was not taken on school property or a school-sponsored event. like that ends the problem? there's an investigation into the circumstances. it's going on right now.

this morning the auschwitz memorial organization responded to a photo with a message on twitter. they wrote this and it's something to listen to. "this is why every single day we work hard to educate. we need to explain what is the danger of hateful ideology rising. auschwitz with its gas chambers was at the very end of the long process of normalizing and accommodating hatred." let's bring in d. lemon on this. don, one student in the picture who wished to remain anonymous, said the photographer, instructed the boys to raise their hands. that's their excuse. >> uh-huh. well, i don't know, when i was -- how old are they, 17, right? i wouldn't have done it when i was 17. i don't know why -- why do we have to block it out? >> because a lot of them are minors. >> they put it on social media. >> i know. >> they put it on social need what for everyone to see, so why do that? >> because sometimes you protect people even from themselves. >> i don't know why you do that. if they're old enough and bold enough to do a nazi salute symbol and to say the things

that i've heard, if you look at the comments under that and also other young people, some of them anonymous, some of them not, talking, making the claims of what happens at that school, allegedly. >> right. >> and how some of the school officials overlook bigotry and talk of hatred and on and on. >> there was also a suggestion that during the election that same community was getting propaganda from white nationalists as well. so they may have a problem there because, look, let's, to your original point, it's not the kind of thing that just pops into your head to do in a prom picture. you know, if you're going to do a spoofy prom picture, even if you don't want to be serious, even if you don't mean it, that's still not the first thing to pop into your head. >> no, it's not the first thing to pop in your head. if someone tells you to do that and you go wait, what? listen, i have gone back and forth about this all day. thinking about it. know how i feel about what they did. i'm waiting for the excuse to

people say why ruin their lives. they did it to themselves. by the time you are that age you should know better when it comes to these matters. they have to learn it. the things i hear they're saying allegedly. they have a real problem there. they're learning this and they're learning this behavior from someone else. it doesn't happen in a vacuum. >> right. >> it wasn't just a bunch of kidding come around saying, oh, let's do this. they learned it from their parents and from people they're in close proximity with. >> right. >> this is just -- it's a whole new crop of bigots that they're creating with these young people. >> i understand, and that school, they may say it didn't happen here. it wasn't at one of our functions. it's not the end for them either. they have a duty to teach these kids, and it's going to have to be something they deal with one way or the other. d. lemon, i've got to jump. i'll be with you at the top of the hour. >> valerie jarrett coming up to talk about michelle obama's new book, the former first lady.

>> strong. >> yeah. see you. all right. when we come back, veterans day yesterday. we celebrate it today. what does it mean to new what does it mean to me? they may be a little bit different. i'm going to tell you a story when we come back that i haven't told you before. i have shared it in the past, but it really matters today.

this is big! t-mobile is offering the awesome iphone xr with an unlimited plan for just $40 bucks a month. unlimited. with the new iphone xr?! yeah, iphone xr included. for $40 bucks?! that is big.

[ neighing ] [ neighing ] [ sigh ] it's bring your own phone, not pony. so i could've taken the bus? yeah. bring your phone. switch your carrier. save hundreds a year with xfinity mobile. call, click or visit a store today.

veterans day, born on the cease-fire, the armistice, on the 11th hour of the 11th day of the 11th month, 1918. that marked the end of fighting in world war i. our fighting men and women and their families gave so much then and ever since. in fact, we honor them twice officially, now and of course on memorial day for special homage for those who have made the ultimate sacrifice. here's the problem. if you're honest about it, for too many of us, these occasions have become increasingly passive. it's a day off. it's a long weekend. memorial day is the unofficial start of summer. thank a vet. support the troops. never forget. these are phrases, and they're good phrases, and we should say them. but often they carry no further connection and certainly no further commitment. less and less of us have kids,

siblings, loved ones in the service. but this isn't about casting blame, and it's only a touch about shame and mostly on me. really it's about me asking myself and all of you to walk the talk. we have over 100,000 troops right now around the world. we have close to 15,000 in syria and afghanistan. they're in nasty situations. i don't report on it much, especially afghanistan, because you don't care enough to watch. now, that's kind of a copout, and i'm going to address that in a moment. but our men and women are fighting, and they're sometimes dying over there in afghanistan. we've had 100 lose their lives in the last few years. 100. advise and assist, the missions are called. that gives you a wrongly benign thought about the reality. i told you about major taylor. remember him, the utah mayor? seven kids, the youngest one, caroline, is 11 months. he died defending elections in afghanistan and he asked us all to vote.

he's just one who are over there who sacrificed everything. now they go home. the pledge we and so, so many politicians make is to give the vets the very best, and it falls short way too often. the v.a., that's an obvious one for you. it's not where it needs to be. there's controversy surrounding the trump administration handling of who runs it, how it operates. 80,000 vets have not gotten g.i. bill payments recently because of i.t. errors. you know how important that money is to them? congress was messing with veterans' ability to use those benefits for their own families. cost-cutting on their backs. tens of thousands of vets battle homelessness. did you know that? many of their families struggle financially when deployed. 20 service members a day commit suicide, a problem that we haven't been able to reduce in recent years despite efforts. we just don't match our talk with our walk. that's what i'm arguing. just care more. me too.

especially me. i have more ability to do what i'm asking from you, and i am going to do more, whether you watch or not. it matters. i'm making a mistake not doing it. it's not why i do the job. now i also have a special debt that many of you don't. i've been in many conflicts abroad since 9/11. i've seen ugly realities and i have a special reason to give back. back when i was in iraq, i was there with my photographer and a producer, and you're going to see what happened. now, this was just after there had been a big argument about having up armored doors on humvees and whether they made a difference. it saved us in a very, very way. that's me there. we were in a convoy that got the business end of a very big ied, a body bomb in iraq. we were firsthand witnesses and beneficiaries of american excellence. and then there was the part that i've just never forgotten. after what they did for me, these men and women, they sent me, the one they kept safe, the

one who did nothing to help protect his own life -- they sent me a combat pin and a flag from the vehicle that i was in and a congratulatory letter. the irony. these soldiers told me that i was one of them now, that i had seen combat, and then there was a note. we just want you to know we went right back to the same place the next day, and we were hit again, and we'll keep going. and they did. they fought on. i don't know how many ultimately made it back and how many were hurt that day. i'll never forget what they showed me and what they did for me. i owe them, and i will do more. i promise you that. i promise you that. so to the troops, to the men and women who serve us, to the sacrifices of their families, thank you so much for what you do for all of us and what you did for me and my family. i will never forget. thank you for watching. thank you for thinking about it. i appreciate that. we've got "cnn tonight with don lemon" straight ahead. >> well stated, my friend. never forget. you know, i remember that.

some people forget. i mean those were horrific, horrific times. they saw the images coming out of it, but you actually experienced it. i remember your colleague, bob woodruff -- >> they saved his life. >> saved his life. >> and he made one of the most miraculous recoveries that medicine has ever seen. he's better looking than me now, after the explosion, and he started the bob woodruff foundation. they do stand up for heroes. they change fallen and injured and recovering troops' lives. if people want to give money, if you have that, go to that foundation. they do god's work in that place. >> and what you said is all the more important, that we support our men and women in uniform, support our veterans when they come home, make sure they're taken care of, make sure they have the best hospitals, the best of the best because not everybody in this country makes