all of us here in "the situation room" send our best wishes. look at how cute she is. thanks very much for watching. stay with cnn later tonight for election night in america continued. that starts in one hour, 8:00 p.m. eastern. "erin burnett outfront" starts "erin burnett outfront" starts right now. -- captions by vitac -- www.vitac.com "outfront" next, a top national security official headed for the door after the first lady, in a stunning move, publicly called for the firing. why did melania trump issue this extraordinary statement? plus a federal judge granting cnn a hearing after the network sued trump over revoking jim acosta's press kcredentials. and alexandria ocasio-cortez. good evening, i'm erin burnett. "outfront" tonight, fired cnn reporting. president trump has decided to fire deputy national security adviser after melania trump's

public demand to do so. it's an extraordinary move and the first lady's office issued a statement calling for his firing. the unprecedented public statement reading in part, "it's the position of the office of the first lady that he no longer deserves the honor of serving in this white house." that was a public statement. the unprecedented public slam of a senior white house staffer dropped literally moments after this. you see her smiling. she's standing just a few feet away from her boss, the president of the united states during an event at the white house. moments after that, the first lady drops this statement. now, one source is telling cnn that the first lady's feud with her took off after a battle over seating on melania trump's plane during her recent trip to africa. and the "wall street journal" is reporting that this is deeply personal, saying the first lady's team told president trump that she is suspected of planting negative stories about the first lady. now, this top firing would be

top news in and of itself, especially with the first lady's unprecedented calling for it but this firing may not be the only one about to add to the white house chaos. cnn reporting president trump is unhappy with kirstjen nielsening the secretary of homeland security and specifically her handling of the border and when asked today if he's calling for her resignation, this is what happened. >> mr. president, do you plan to replace secretary nielsen. >> are you firing secretary nielsen? >> are you going to take things to that level? >> three times he was asked, and three times, he appeared to ignore the question. also tonight, we are learning that the president's chief of staff, john kelly, could be finally about to go. we're reporting the president is already discussing his replacement. and these folks may be among a group about to leave. it's something the president himself is expecting and seems to be proud of. >> people leave.

they come in, they're here, it's a very exhausting job, although i love doing it. i must tell you. but it's exhausting for a lot of people. i'm surprised at a lot of people. they start off, they're young people, they're there for two years and they're old by the time they leave. it's quite exhausting. but i love doing it. everybody wants to work in this white house. we are a hot country. this is a hot white house. we are a white house that people want to work with. >> only he could sell it as a hot white house. i mean, any white house is a hot white house. jeff zeleny is "outfront" live at the white house. hot white house aside, what are you learning? yeah, we've got all these headlines of possible firings and this unprecedented story with melania trump. >> reporter: erin, tonight the white house was hot but maybe in a different way. in a very unusual way. for all the staff shake-ups that happened here and we have seen a lot of them, we have never seen this cross firing from the east wing of the white house from the

first lady's office to the west wing of the white house where the national security advisers are. it was very unusual to get that type of a statement from the first lady. she doesn't issue that many statements at all, certainly not about the deputy national security adviser so the reality here is there has been a lot of rumors and some discontent about the deputy national security adviser. john bolton, the national security adviser, brought her in. he's known her for a long time. she has a long history at the pentagon on capitol hill. she apparently has rubbed a lot of people the wrong way, including the first lady. when she was traveling earlier this year, she was not pleased with what some of her staff was doing to her, et cetera, so the reality here, though, so many staff shake-ups. we did learn today the president is going to dismiss her, but what we don't know is what comes next. secretary nielsen, the homeland security secretary, we are now learning tonight is going to the border tomorrow to see what's going on there in terms of the u.s. soldiers on the border.

she is widely believed, we've been talking to officials here, to be the next cabinet secretary to go. what does that mean? will it set off a set of dominos? will white house chief of staff john kelly leave after that? he, of course, is her mentor in many respects. she worked under him. so the question is, is this the beginning of a lot of shake-ups? the answer seems to be yes. one person i talked to earlier today said really the only people who seem secure of their jobs are ivanka trump and jared kushner, of course related to the president. so, i think in the next coming weeks or so, before we hit january, a lot of new faces here at the white house, erin. >> jeff, thank you very much. i want to go to marc short, the former white house director of legislative affairs for president trump. and he did sign an nda after leaving the white house. always important, marc, just to note that so our viewers understand. paul, former white house counselor to president clinton and kate bennett, our white house reporter who has traveled with the first lady, including on this most recent trip which seems to be at the heart, perhaps, kate, of what is

happening now. i mean, when we say a stunning and unprecedented move, we've never seen anything like this from a first lady. she could have privately gone to her husband and talked about this or demand this. that is not how she chose to do it. this woman standing next to the president today and a few minutes later, this unbelievable statement comes out from melania trump. what happened here? >> well, i mean, i think a few things happened here. and i think, you know, it is true, historically, first ladies typically -- some of them do weigh in. some more than others. nancy reagan famously did as well. they did it behind the scenes. this happened very publicly. my source is telling me this is not the first time the first lady had expressed her displeasure about this particular staffer to her husband, that it happened many times before after this africa trip where there was a dust-up, certainly something happened that upset the first lady who is very loyal to her very small staff. the complaint here is that ricardel perhaps was not treating her staff well. this thing happened in africa.

she talked about it. she wanted it fixed. she wanted the president to perhaps do something about this. that didn't happen. today, we got this statement. i think the charge here from the first lady's office, from the east wing, is that there was something brewing, ricardel was trying to plant stories or shine a negative light on the first lady and her office and that's the type of thing, historically, with this particular first lady, who, jeff was right, is very, very quiet, doesn't release a lot of statements. that's the sort of thing that in the past has gotten her ire up and certainly we've seen these fiery moments come through her spokesperson but unprecedented for sure. >> marc, unprecedented and look, i'm not -- we don't know 100%, but obviously, what kate's saying is she said to the president to do this before. it sounds like he ignored her because she had to put it out publicly for him to do it. is what we're seeing actually a riff between the president and the first lady? is that what this is about?

>> no, i don't think that's what this is about. i think the first lady is an incredibly kind and gracious flar first lady and i think there's probably more to the story that will come out later. the fact that she hasn't weighed in on other personnel decisions is an indication of that so this is probably something that's more exceptional and as you and your audience have noted before, nancy reagan did fire ronald reagan's chief of staff so yes, it was not public in the way it was here, but i think you'll find out over time that this is probably an exception and that the first lady probably had reason. >> paul, what do you make of it? reason or not reason and also, of the fact that she asked her husband to do it and he didn't do it so she put it out publicly. >> that's what's extraordinary. first ladies have always had power and marc's right that first lady nancy reagan did, in fact, persuade her husband to fire his chief of staff, don regan, but to do that through the press, it suggests that this is the only way to talk to our

president, that he's chauncey gardner from "being there." he's going to look back on the first two years which we think was like bizarro world. those were the good old days. he's now going to be faced with legislation on things from voting rights to minimum wage to child care to equal pay. he's going to have to deal with a democratic congress that's sending him bills that are very popular that he may not want to sign but might have to. then there are the investigations. then there are all the foreign threats we learned today about a dozen new north korean missile sites. all of those threats are coming and meanwhile, he's got his own first lady attacking him through the press. it's unbelievable. >> marc, is there something to this, that this is the only way to be heard to this president. he may pillory the press, for god's sake, we know that's what he thrives upon, that's the oxygen in the room, but yet, until we say i want, it doesn't

matter. >> i think the reality is in this case, i think what the more appropriate action is for the national security adviser, if he's been directed to remove her, that it's his decision. i think unfortunately what makes this more complicated is the national security adviser actually oversees travel with the vice president so ideally, this is something that would have happened when john bolton was here and it would have been his to make that decision and take care of that action more so than the president. >> kate? >> i will say the first lady has become more and more vocal about her influence on the president. she did say in an abc news interview in africa that she does tell the president when she doesn't trust people on his staff and she said -- she was asked, well, what happens, and she said, some of those people don't work here anymore. and you know, i think for sure, if she felt strongly -- i don't necessarily find it's a rift between the president and the first lady. i think this is certainly the first lady really making her case that she's very, very unhappy and i think it really points to that delineation between the east wing and the west wing. this east wing operates on its

own, completely independently of the west wing. i mean, i would imagine that the west wing probably didn't get a heads up or wasn't able to do anything if they did get a heads up before this statement came out about a west wing staffer. so, certainly, this is something very, very new and it shows the difference between the two sides of the building. >> i mean, marc, it is shocking. you would think that the first lady and the president would have had -- i mean, it is shocking that it happened this way, right? you have them standing together, and then the first lady says, fire her. i mean, you would agree with that optically, right? >> yeah, erin, i think i said that this is unprecedented and it's something that ideally would have happened when ambassador bolton was back, but again, to suggest that this represents two different east wing and west wing not talking to each other, every staff meeting we had the first lady's chief of staff was -- >> how does it not represent that? if they were talking, there would be no need for this to happen. >> i think it's the exception.

i think the way it's being presented is as if it was the rule. >> the first lady never has to approve anything from her tweets to her statements from the west wing. we've reported that. this is -- she's done it on her own. i specifically asked, does the first lady need to, you know, run this by the president or the west wing before she does something and the answer i have gotten several times is no. >> and all i know is all the events that we did, we coordinated that closely with the first lady's office and it was a very cordial and close relationship. >> all right. also, even when it came to the jacket, you know the one about i don't care, i mean, they had two different stories coming out about that. paul, let me ask you, though. secretary mattis on the west wing side, defense secretary, was asked if he agrees with the first lady about ricardel, obviously important person, senior official with national security and when he was asked whether she should leave, here's how he responded today. >> do you agree with the first lady that mira ricardel should

leave? >> i don't comment on other people's staffing issues. >> paul, what do you read into that? is that a slam on how this was handled. obviously he would be very familiar with her. >> i think general mattis is a great warrior and he just proved himself to be a great diplomat. barbara starr reported earlier there were a lot of negative comments from mattis land in the pentagon about ms. ricardel. that's the way to handle it, though. i think it's great that the first lady has influence. i think she should. i think the president needs somebody who can give him unvarnished advice and truth. i think it's great. but if you're going to go public, ma'am, this would be my advice. you have to go all the way. in other words, if you say that ms. ricardel is unworthy to serve our country, you better tell us why. >> that's the big question. marc, do you have any idea why? the other thing we've been reporting and this comes to the line of jim mattis, is that she was very loyal. mira ricardel to the president and she would say, don't let jim

mattis hire this person or that person, they're not loyal to you, bush people or whatever it is, that the president may have had some loyalty to ricardel. >> my experience with mira was that she was always very professional, erin, so i don't know what transpired in the last couple months. as i said, i think it's obviously unprecedented but my experience with the first lady as well is that she was always incredibly kind and gracious and for her to take this step would mean she felt very strongly about something that occurred. >> i would say, to paul's point, that we do have a right to know. if someone's going to come out and say, unfit the serve the country, you're going to besmirch someone's person and their career in that manner, we would all deserve to know why. >> i agree with that. >> and certainly we've reached out to get her side of the story. we have not heard that yet. but we have, of course, reached out for comment. >> and i think we all can agree it's very important for all to know if that's going to be put out there what it is. thank you all so very much. next, a second court challenge just filed saying

trump's appointment of acting attorney general matt whitaker is unconstitutional and congressman adam schiff with a warning. plus a judge granting cnn a hearing tomorrow in its case against president trump and the white house. the lawsuit was filed today after the white house revoked jim acosta's press pass. an attorney is "outfront" in the case. and could it get any uglier? democrat bill nelson now filing a lawsuit in the florida recount, looking to extend the deadline. did you get a whole thanksgiving? well you remember what happened last year. you can't bring a backup thanksgiving to my sister's house. it's not like we're going to walk in with it. we'll bring it in as we need it. ...phase it in. phase it in? yeah, phase it in. phase it in? irobot has your everyday whatsolution.mess,

roomba vacuums up dry debris and pet hair throughout your home. and for wet messes, say hello to the braava jet mopping robot. its precision jet spray and vibrating cleaning head loosen and scrub stains from your hard floors. braava jet is designed to navigate kitchens, and could it get any uglier? so you can enjoy cleaner floors and a fresher home everyday. you, roomba and braava jet from irobot. better together. ( ♪ )

coaching means making tough choices. jim! you're in! but when you have high blood pressure and need cold medicine that works fast, the choice is simple. coricidin hbp is the #1 brand that gives powerful cold symptom relief without raising your blood pressure. coricidin hbp. and i'm still going for my best even though i live with a higher risk of stroke due to afib not caused by a heart valve problem. so if there's a better treatment than warfarin, i'm up for that. eliquis. eliquis is proven to reduce stroke risk better than warfarin. plus has significantly less major bleeding than warfarin. eliquis is fda-approved and has both. so what's next? seeing these guys. don't stop taking eliquis unless your doctor tells you to, as stopping increases your risk of having a stroke. eliquis can cause serious and in rare cases fatal bleeding.

don't take eliquis if you have an artificial heart valve or abnormal bleeding. while taking eliquis, you may bruise more easily and it may take longer than usual for any bleeding to stop. seek immediate medical care for sudden signs of bleeding, like unusual bruising. eliquis may increase your bleeding risk if you take certain medicines. tell your doctor about all planned medical or dental procedures. eliquis, the number one cardiologist-prescribed blood thinner. ask your doctor if eliquis is what's next for you.

breaking news, a judge scheduling the first hearing in cnn's lawsuit against president trump. cnn suing the trump white house after it revoked our chief white house correspondent jim acosta's press pass, the white house pulling the pass last week after an exchange with president trump about the migrant or van. >> they're hundreds of miles away. they're hundreds and hundreds of miles away. that's not an invasion. >> honestly, i think you should let me run the country. you run cnn. and if you did it well, your ratings would be much better. >> if i may -- >> that's enough. that's enough. >> mr. president, i -- i was going to ask one other -- the folks -- pardon me, ma'am, i'm -- mr. president. >> excuse me. that's enough. >> "outfront" now, one of the attorneys representing cnn in its case against the president and ted, i appreciate your time tonight. so, there is this hearing now tomorrow. how significant is it? >> it's a very significant and

important hearing. we were very pleased that the court ordered it to happen so quickly. that's what we had asked for. it's a request that we've made for what's called a temporary restraining order. we're asking the judge to immediately restore jim acosta's press credentials because he's being -- he and cnn are being harmed every day because he's barred from doing his job. he's barred from covering the news. and so, the immediate request is for those credentials to be returned and then the case can play out going forward if necessary. so, it's an important hearing. >> so, look, the white house has come out and said this is all a bunch of, you know, their words, grandstanding. that's what cnn is doing. quote, grandstanding. what's your response to that? >> my response is cnn did not want to have to go to court simply to cover the white house and to cover president trump. we tried to work it out. we reached out from the highest levels of cnn to the white house and got nothing and got no response. and this isn't about cnn and jim

acosta, really. it's about the american people's ability to get information about its government, and one of the big arguments we make in our case is that the d.c. circuit, the highest court of appeals in washington, has held many years ago, regarding press credentials at the white house, there needs to be a process. you can't just take them away because you get mad at what a reporter is asking, because you don't like the content of the news. so it's a very important principle that goes far beyond this particular dispute. >> now, look, the president loves this sort of thing, okay? and he has in particular singled out jim acosta many times. he's called him crazy and he's also said things like this. >> i'll tell you what, cnn should be ashamed of itself, having you working for them. you are a rude, terrible person. i think jim acosta is a very unprofessional man. i think -- he does this with everybody. look, i don't think he's a smart person, but he's got a loud voice. >> do prior comments like those

about jim acosta play into this suit, ted? >> they -- the prior comments that president trump has made, including in the press conference on november 7th, and many before and about cnn are also important parts of our suit, because the supreme court said many times that courts and government officials, no one in government can discriminate or punish people based on their viewpoint and based on what their reporting if they're journalists and that's a core part of our suit, and we argue that it's clear, the reason jim acosta's press credentials were taken away is because president trump doesn't like him, doesn't like what he's reporting and that's the president's prerogative but that's what the first amendment protects. it protects that sort of vigorous reporting that sometimes can be very irritating to government officials, but that's keeping them honest. >> all right, thank you very much, ted, i appreciate your time. >> thanks again for having me. all right, "outfront" now,

our chief media correspondent, reliable sources anchor brian stelter along with april ryan, white house correspondent for american urban radio networks and author of "under fire: reporting from the front lines of the trump white house" and april's you're important in all this. the president's called you out specifically by name as a loser, asking nasty questions. as part of this whole brouhaha. brian, let me start with you, though, because this has gotten to the point of a lawsuit. but you just heard one of cnn's lawyers there saying that they tried to not have it go to that point. they tried to get the press pass back. tell us what you know about that. what did they try to do? >> the goal was a quiet resolution. this happened last wednesday night, the press pass gets revoked, it happened out of nowhere, the white house did not follow the established procedures in the event that a press pass was going to be taken away. so, thursday, the head of this network, jeff zucker sent a letter to john kelly, the chief of staff, said this was an illegal action, you gave us no

notice, we demand the credential be restored right away. that's thursday. then friday, then saturday, nothing happened for days and days. that's why cnn eventually decided it had to go to court. this was essentially the last step in the chain, and now this court battle will begin tomorrow as we mentioned, a hearing tomorrow afternoon. cnn would like a quick response by the judge to reinstate the press credential via a temporary restraining order. we'll see if that happens. >> april, cnn says this is about much more than jim acosta and cnn and obviously the president often uses cnn as a boogeyman but they've used other news networks and other individuals, you among them. you've long been a target. you know, he's threatening to take away more press credentials when he was talking about this overall issue or friday, he sort of brought your name up out of the blue. >> out of the blue. >> didn't say he was taking your press credential away but he called you nasty and a loser, i believe. so is that a threat? do you think you're next if this

will continue? >> well, erin, you know, right after he talked about jim, he talked about me. i wasn't even there and i was on his mind. he was talking because someone asked him about the press credential and if he would indeed restore it or what have you, and the president talked about jim acosta and then he went into this diatribe about me. i wasn't there, and then he was talking about the respect for the office and the presidency. i don't know where that comes from, just for asking a question. and you cannot, whether you're president or a principal, you cannot dictate what we ask. we are part of the u.s. constitution, the first amendment. you know, part of the accountability piece where we ask questions that give america the answers and the cnn lawsuit is critical, not just for me and not just for jim but for others because if they have a whim at any moment to say i don't like what this person asks, because

they have been upset with me since january when i asked the president, are you a racist. they've been very upset and trying to find a way to pull me out of there. i've done nothing wrong and neither has jim and neither has anyone else there. but if, indeed, they're allowed to do this, they could go down the road and even pull the people out that they like at fox news if the president decides that he doesn't like them anymore. this is a dangerous game. >> and brian, i think to april's point, you know, some people watched that exchange with jim acosta and they say, well, he kept interrupting, shouldn't the president be allowed to have other people ask questions. the answer is, sure, he should, but every reporter from every network, including fox news, tries to push and say, let me get another question, you're not answering my question. that's the way it goes and i think people need to understand that. that is not a unique moment, far from it. that is the way it operates every day. >> right. >> with every reporter. friendly or not, right? they try to get more questions in. >> definitely. >> and you do see it from fox news reporters so i think people need to understand that, to not have in any mind to confuse what respect means for the office.

>> and i get that acosta, you know, he has an aggressive style, some people think it's off putting. i like that different reporters in the white house have different styles. that's parking lt of a free pre. notice how the white house's explanations have shifted over the past week. first was a lie about grabbing, putting his hands on an intern, obviously, he was being very respectful, he said, pardon me ma'am, as he was trying to hold on to the mike. sarah sanders has backed away from that placed his hands on a woman line. however, the white house is continuing to say that he was rude and unprofessional. but that is not the legal issue here. the legal issue is whether the procedures were followed and they weren't. and look, i know trump has a lot of loyal fans out there. but most americans don't want any president choosing who gets to pick -- who gets to cover the white house. >> they should understand it goes both ways. april, before we go, quickly, though, bob woodward, obviously, now works at nbc news but "washington post" reporter.

he says the lawsuit is negative. his quote was, trump is sitting around saying, this is great. when we engage in trump's strategy, we are taking his bait. a word used by the "daily beast" was the president is giddy, right, to see a headline in a lawsuit, cnn versus donald j. trump. do you think the president is benefitting? >> you know, with this president, he believes any kind of press is great press, whether it's negative or positive. but what i will tell you is, the president can be giddy but i really don't believe he really fully understands the ramifications of what this is about. maybe he does and he doesn't want people to know. this is not necessarily about us. yes, this is a lawsuit by cnn for the other -- and all the news organizations, to keep us in that room, free and unfettered, without them taking our badges because they don't like the questions. >> just follow the rules. >> yeah, yeah. following the rules. and actually, what this really does, if they oppress and

suppress us, it is about the american public not getting information, free-flowing transparent information, not from a government spin but from reporters who are doing their job, and following the u.s. constitution. it's about the american public and their information first and foremost. >> all right. thank you both very much. and next, president trump defending his acting attorney general, matt whitaker. there's a new legal challenge tonight saying the appointment is unconstitutional. congressman adam schiff is "outfront." and alexandria ocasio-cortez, one of the rising stars in the democratic party, arriving at capitol hill for the first time after her win and her first order of business, picketing nancy pelosi. opportunity is everywhere. like here. and here. see? opportunity. ev-er-y-where. about to be parents. meeting the parents. and this driver, logging out to watch his kid hit one out of the... (bat hits ball)

opportunity is everywhere. all you have to do to find it is get out...here. ♪ ♪ the greatest wish of all... is one that brings us together. the lincoln wish list event is here. sign and drive off in a new lincoln with $0 down, $0 due at signing, and a complimentary first month's payment. only at your lincoln dealer.

and a complimentary first month's payment. so, let's talk about conference calls. there's always a certain amount of fumbling. a lot of times it doesn't work. we have problems. comcast business goes beyond fast. by letting you make and receive calls from any device using your business line. and conference calls you can join without any dial-ins or pins. (phone) there are currently 3 members in this conference. i like that. i like that too. i would use that in a heartbeat. get started with innovative voice solutions for a low price when you get fast, reliable internet. comcast business. beyond fast.

breaking news, another legal challenge to the president's appointment of acting attorney general matt whitaker. this is the second motion saying that the appointment is unconstitutional. president trump's response? well, two senior administration officials telling cnn tonight, he's fighting. that trump plans to keep whitaker in the job. "outfront" tonight, adam schiff, top democrat on the intelligence committee so he's slated to become the chairman of that committee in the next congress. great to have you with me, congressman. i really appreciate your time. do you think whitaker's appointment is unconstitutional? would you go that far? >> you know, on balance, i think it probably is.

i think the court, a neutral court, and i hope that's what we have, will find that it violates the requirement that a principal officer only be confirmed with the advice and consent of the senate. there is a olc, office of legal counsel, justice department opinion that is several years old that the justice department may rely on but i think that's a poor judgment, constitutionally. the vacancy reform act, which they're making this appointment under, a statute, cannot trump the constitution and there are some pretty powerful precedent and language from current members of the supreme court that i think indicates strongly that this will be struck down. >> now, when you say they may rely on, right, you know, something they had done a couple years ago, they were expected, the justice department, to issue an opinion today, right, from their office of legal counsel and it was going to be a defense of this entire thing. matt whitaker's appointment. they didn't do that. it didn't come out.

it's been delayed until at least tomorrow. do you read anything into that? >> i'm not sure what to read into it. i wouldn't be surprised if there was a debate going on within the justice department that, okay, yes, we can rely on a decision we made before but it looks like the decision we made before has been superceded by what we see in different opinions of the supreme court and in the concurring or dissenting opinions that that earlier judgment may now no longer be valid. so, that debate may be happening. they may also be trying to figure out what they're going to do about the recusal issue that is obviously a separate legal question, and in that respect, i think that issue looks far more clear cut that whitaker has to recuse himself. >> he has made comments before and i'm going to play those in a moment but let me ask you on this, because when it comes to that issue of the mueller investigation, from what we know, right, we're talking about weeks here, maybe months, but the president does plan to appoint someone else to the attorney general position

permanently, so if that's the end game, why do you care so much about whitaker and these next few weeks or months. do you think something so dramatic could happen in that time? >> well, i do. it's entirely possible that whitaker takes action to interfere with mueller, to hobble the investigation, tells mueller, essentially, you cannot look into this issue or if mueller is ready to issue a report within the next couple months, that whitaker may make the judgment that report will not be sent to congress or it will not be made public, so those are obviously key decisions, but also, whitaker could serve as the back channel to trump and his lawyers in a way that no matter who fills that job later, you can't undo the damage that is done by compromising the investigation. >> okay. all right. so, that's a point of permanent damage that you're making. but look, you want whitaker to recuse himself from the mueller investigation, at least, and you mentioned things he said. so let he just, you know, familiarize our viewers with some of those things that whitaker has said about mueller.

here he is. >> there's no evidence of anything illegal happening in the 2016 election related to the trump campaign and the, you know, russian government or their associates. an effort by jim comey to get this put in place and have somebody that he's very familiar with and bob mueller conducting the investigation, so i don't know. i think it smells a little fishy. why don't these folks hurry up? i mean, it is not helping this administration. >> i mean, look, he doesn't like the investigation, he's made it clear. you know, but the republican chairman on the senate side of the investigation, richard burr, known for being measured, running a respected and thorough investigation, just said this afternoon, congressman, quote, i didn't have any concerns with sessions or whitaker. so, he's saying he's fine with it. do you really think whitaker, given -- especially given that he said those things would have the nerve to try to end the mueller investigation? >> well, look, you know, whitaker made it plain that he was taking this gig as a

commentator for the express purpose of auditioning for the president and it looks like it had its intended effect, that he was chosen specifically as basically what the president said he wanted, which was his own roy cohen in the justice department and even if he's replaced later, that replacement has to go through santa barbaen confirmation where you can exact pledges not to interfere, you can determine whether they made commitments or promises to the president about how they'd handle the investigation before taking the job. obviously, that can't be done at this point with whitaker. in terms of comments from senator burr, who i have a lot of respect for, frankly, the only one we have seen with any consistent willingness to stand up to the president was john mccain and we lost him, terrible to lose him, but terrible time to lose him also because he had the stature to stand up to this president. i have no doubt that if a democratic president were putting someone in place that had made comments like that about an investigation in which

that democratic president may be implicated, the republican chairs would be screaming to the rafters right now and they should. >> i'm sure they would be. if they're honest about that, they would admit that's true. i want to ask you one question, congressman, about our other top story tonight before we go. melania trump. apparently she's asked her husband, she doesn't like the department national security adviser, mira ricardel. that department national security adviser appears with him today, moments later, this unprecedented statement comes out that she's unfit to serve the united states from the first lady about mira ricardel. what do you make of this? >> well, that's a pretty rare step for a first lady to make a public statement that somebody needs to get fired. clearly, there's some bad blood there. but i do think it's indicative of the fact that sessions may have been the first head to roll, but there are other heads that are on the chopping block, and what's more, the first family takes this job very

personally. you're either with the trumps or you're against them and if you're against them, it doesn't matter what your record is. it doesn't matter whether you're looking out for the interests of the country, as in the case of russia, sessions actually was doing his job, and he was following the ethics rules. the president certainly is only about the president, but it was surprising to see the first lady also weigh in on a personnel matter to this degree. >> as you say, an unprecedented moment to see that, the way she chose to do it. thank you so much, congressman schiff. >> thank you. and next, the battle royale over florida's senate seat just went defcon tonight. democrats say rick scott needs to recuse himself and a top adviser will respond. plus 125 women elected to congress, a record, and a lot of races still too close to call. today, though, the women arrived on capitol hill ready to work. >> do you know your way around? >> not quite yet. it's a very big building. (chime)

- [narrator] meet shark's newest robot vacuum. it powerfully cleans from floors to carpets, even pet hair, with ease, and now for cleaning surfaces above the floor, it comes with a built in shark handheld. one dock, two sharks. the shark ion robot cleaning system. up here at the dewar's distillery, all our whiskies are aged, blended and aged again. it's the reason our whisky is so extraordinarily smooth. dewar's. double aged for extra smoothness.

we've frozen out...out... and forgotten... by a white house and washington mired in special-interests politics. but we can take our country back with a democratic agenda for the people. that means lowering healthcare costs, increasing pay through rebuilding america, and cleaning up corruption. and it means having the strength to stand up for our values. it's time to make washington work for the people again.

breaking tonight, a legal battle royale in the state of florida. democrat bill nelson's campaign just filing a federal lawsuit seeking to extend the deadline for the statewide recount. and in his first public appearance since the election, nelson calling for his opponent, rick scott, to formally recuse himself from the recount.

>> it's become obvious that mr. scott cannot oversee the process in a fair and impartial way and he should remove himself from the recount process. >> "outfront" now, gail, senior adviser to governor rick scott's senate campaign. good to have you with me. you just heard bill nelson, federal lawsuit. what's your reaction? >> well, it just makes no sense with chuck schumer and with bill nelson asking governor scott to recuse himself. this is a made-up talking point by some pr person in d.c. who clearly doesn't understand state lay in florida. what state law in florida actually says is that there are 67 counties. each one of those 67 counties has an elected official who is in charge of their county elections. rick scott has -- doesn't -- isn't in charge of any of them. so, there would be nothing for him to recuse himself for.

the argument just doesn't make sense and neither did that press conference today. it just continues to be another d distractive tactic that democrats are trying to use. >> you're saying as governor of the state, even though he is governor of the state where this is all happening in those counties that he has -- it's impossible to recuse himself. you're saying it's actually impossible to recuse? >> well, that's correct. yeah, he's not -- the people who are in charge of these elections have been elected by the people, and they're -- they are elected by the people in those 67 counties. >> so he would have no role whatsoever in certifying or allowing or anything. >> none. >> okay. all right. >> that's correct. >> so -- >> other than that, their argument makes perfect sense. >> on the recusal, okay, so let me ask you, though. governor scott has had a point of view on this, right? he hasn't been an innocent bystander because he's running, first of all, and because he has used the word -- he's talked about voter fraud, said votes are being, quote, stolen from him. just a few things, gail, that he

has said. >> senator nelson is clearly trying to try to commit fraud to try to win this election. we don't know how many more votes they're going to come up with, but this sure appears they're going to keep finding as many votes as it takes to win this election. bill nelson is clearly a sore loser. he's just here to steal this election. >> are you comfortable with that word? steal? >> i'm completely comfortable. what governor scott has said is exactly what's happening. we've seen bill nelson and his legal team file a ridiculous lawsuit yesterday that would actually ask the state to count votes that were -- that came in after the election was over. that is a very true fact. his lawyer filed a lawsuit that wants to count -- that wants to count ballots that came in illegally. >> right, but -- but my understanding is if you are overseas or you're in the military, as long as your ballot's postmarked by the election day, then it should be counted, right? so they wouldn't get it until after the election. those votes should be counted. are you saying they shouldn't be? >> our side has -- erin, our side has been very clear about

this. we want every single legal ballot to be counted legally. bill nelson is his legal team want illegal ballots to be counted, and i can give you several examples of that. number one, his legal team sat in a room and asked for an illegal immigrant's ballot to be counted. that is a violation of the law. and then this lawsuit yesterday where illegal ballots that would be brought in after the election was over should be counted toward his total as well. that is a violation of the law. so, there's any number of examples where bill nelson is trying to do whatever he can to hold on to this power. so, he has a choice. when this election or when these ballots are counted, he's going to have a choice. he can choose to go out after his long legacy in the senate and he can go out the way that he's trying to go out, by holding on to power. or he can accept the will of the people of florida, which is they elected rick scott. >> okay. quickly, though, before we go, i mean, you know, rick scott

oversees the elections commission and they have found no evidence of fraud whatsoever, and yet you just heard him there talk about fraud. he said senator nelson is trying to commit fraud. he oversees, and i know you're uncomfortable with that word but he oversees that election commission that has found no fraud whatsoever. why is he saying that? >> back up for a second. there are examples of fraud. so, first of all, brenda snipes -- >> so he does not agree with what his own election commission has concluded? >> i'm not going to put words in the governor's mouth but what i will say is that he's exactly right to have asked the fdle to investigate this because brenda snipes was on national tv and your network carried it where she said that she mixed in illegal ballots with legal ballots and now they don't know which wupz are legal and which ones aren't but they want to count all of them and that's just one of many examples of what's happened that have been in violation of the law since this whole recount process started.

there are laws in place to prevent this kind of fraud, and since the -- since this recount has continued, we've seen over and over again the democrats and broward and palm beach county officials completely failing the state of florida. >> all right. thank you very much, gail. i appreciate your time. >> thank you, erin. and next, the record breaking new class of women elected into congress have arrived, and they are speaking out plus, jeanne moos on the real winner in arizona's senate race. you're looking at him/her. we've been helping you prepare and invest for retirement since day one. why would we leave now? because i'm retired now. so? we're voya. we stay with you to and through retirement... with solutions to help provide income throughout. so you'll still be here to help me make smart choices? well, with your finances that is. we had nothing to do with that, uh, tie. or the suit. or the shirt. voya. helping you to and through retirement.

it's a revolution in sleep. the new sleep number 360 smart beds are on sale now during sleep number's veterans day sale. it senses your movement, and automatically adjusts to keep you both comfortable. it even helps with this. so you wake up ready to put your pedal to the metal. it's the final days of our veterans day sale where the queen sleep number 360 c4 smart bed is only $1299 - save $400. plus, 24-month financing on all beds. ends sunday. sleep number. proven, quality sleep i think it will fit.

♪ want a performance car that actually fits your life? introducing the new 2019 ford edge st. capability meets power. in the first suv from the ford performance team. the new 2019 ford edge st. if you're waiting patiently for a liver transplant, it could cost you your life. it's time to get out of line with upmc. at upmc, living-donor transplants put you first. so you don't die waiting. upmc does more living-donor liver transplants than any other center in the nation. find out more and get out of line today.

just moments after arriving on capitol hill as the youngest congresswoman-elect, the rising democratic star, alexandria ocasio-cortez was picketing, piblgti picketing none other than nancy pelosi who had an issue with it. because she's a woman. wo well, ocasio-cortez is joining a record 101 other women who are going to be members of the house of representatives. which doesn't include a handful of race that are still too close to call so it could change a little bit. sunlen serfaty is "outfront." >> my gosh. >> reporter: from the victory stage, to the halls of the u.s. capitol. >> do you know your way around? >> not quite yet, it's a very big building. >> reporter: the new class of women elected into congress have arrived in washington.

>> i guess we're members-elect now. >> reporter: how does it feel to say that? >> still it's a mouthful. it's strange, but i'm sure i'll get used to it. >> reporter: or the squad as one of them put it. >> we're all ready to buckle down and get to work. >> reporter: the women who ran, who won, and will now usher in a new record-breaking makeup of capitol hill. with at least 125 women in congress, at least 40 of them newly elected and 15 of those women of color. >> there's some incredibly talented people coming in in the freshman class. >> reporter: the class includes ilhon omar and rashida talib, the first muslim american women. deb holland. the first native american women. >> tonight we made history. >> reporter: lucy mcbath who lost her son, jordan davis, to gun violence. former cabinet secretary donna shalala. >> i haven't been a freshman for a long time. >> reporter: the youngest member to be elected in congress, 29-year-old alexandria

ocasio-cortez. do you feel like this is the first day of school? >> oh, totally. >> reporter: what are your emotions? you nervous? >> you know, i have butterflies, but i'm excited. >> reporter: and air force veteran chrissie houlihan among others. >> congress school. it does feel a little bit like that. get a backpack and school splice and feels like everything is new. >> reporter: new members did get something of the new backpack which some showed off on social media as they checked in for new member orientation in washington this week. >> seeing a bank of cameras is kind of ridiculous. i've never had that happen to me. >> reporter: meeting their colleagues. finding their sea legs. >> i came through the regular entrance. a capitol police officer was like, no, you need to go through the members entrance. didn't know that. >> reporter: and hoping to move forward. >> i hope we're never continu s continuously talking about the firsts. thank you. >> reporter: that's a sentiment we certainly heard from so many

new members up here on capitol hill, yes, the celebrating of all these records is a good thi thing, at some point they're going to have to move past that and of course start doing the work up here on capitol hill. first up, though, tomorrow, erin, is the class photo then electing new leadership in their caucuses. erin? >> all right, thank you, sunlen. and next, jeanne moos on the real star, martha mcsally's concession video. it is a beautiful star. having moderate to severe plaque psoriasis is not always easy. it's a long-distance journey, and you have the determination to keep going. humira has a proven track record of being prescribed for over 10 years. humira works inside the body to target and help block a specific source of inflammation that contributes to symptoms. most adults taking humira were clear or almost clear and many saw 75% and even 90% clearance in just 4 months. and the kind of clearance that can last. humira can lower your ability to fight infections, including tuberculosis. serious, sometimes fatal, infections and cancers, including lymphoma, have happened, as have blood, liver and nervous system problems, serious allergic reactions

and new or worsening heart failure. before treatment, get tested for tb. tell your doctor if you've been to areas where certain fungal infections are common, and if you've had tb, hepatitis b, are prone to infections, or have flu-like symptoms, or sores. don't start humira if you have an infection. join over 250,000 patients who have chosen humira. ask about the #1 prescribed biologic by dermatologists. humira... and go.

comcast business built the nation's largest gig-speed network. then went beyond. beyond chasing down network problems. to knowing when and where there's an issue. beyond network complexity. to a zero-touch, one-box world. optimizing performance and budget. beyond having questions. to getting answers. "activecore, how's my network?"

"all sites are green." all of which helps you do more than your customers thought possible. comcast business. beyond fast. a republican concedes, it happened 24 hours ago on this show. and boomer, the dog, consoles. here's jeanne. >> reporter: it was a concession speech -- >> i wish her all success. >> reporter: -- that we have to concede succeeded. even representative martha mcsally's dog, boomer, wanted to shake her hand. >> everybody who voted for me, i'm so grateful for you. my wing men and my wing women in this journey. >> boomer is now my nominee for best performance by a dog in a senate election concession speech. >> reporter: boomer's appearance was a triumph on twitter. this is how everyone should concede, with a dog. would vote for that dog for senate. though he has larceny in his past and likes to be bury

things. >> my mom was visiting, we had her pajamas disappear. all of a sudden a few weeks later we have -- we find tops, bottoms, and socks all rolled up together behind the tree. >> reporter: the canine concession -- >> my staff and volunteers -- >> reporter: wrankled some. stop using dogs to humanize yourself. the arizona republican had boomer carry her ballot when she voted. >> they say if you want a friend in washington, get a dog. well, meet my friend, boomer. >> reporter: the two cavorted in a pickup in this campaign ad. >> boo boo, come on. >> reporter: tweeted one cynic, "if only mcsally had campaigned like the person her dog thinks she is." boomer has himself run for elective office, though he skipped making his own concession speech. last year, he ran for cutest dog on capitol hill. losing to another former shelter dog by the name of ellie. but boomer is a winner when it comes to sitting on a couch like a human. >> our best days are still yet

to come. >> reporter: boomer's best days are right now. jeanne moos, cnn, paw, new york. >> and thanks for joining us. our special coverage "election night in america continued" begins right now. we're live here in washington. one full week after america voted. the 2018 midterms continue with cliffhanger contests still unfolding and new results about to come in from california. we back to welcome our viewers here in the united states and around the world. i'm wolf blitzer with jake tapper. we're here in the cnn election center. over the last seven days, we've gotten a fuller picture of the first nationwide vote of the trump presidency, and the historic power shift that's happening right here in washington. democrats retaking