week nights at 6:45 p.m. on facebook. it's our daily newscast on facebook. you get to vote on what stories we cover. you get the details. watch it week night 6:25 eastern at facebook.com/anderson cooper full circle. that's it for us. the news continues. hand it over to chris for cuomo "prime time". >> thank you, anderson. this is cuomo primetime. cohen is going to prison. people say his story is far from over. you can't look at this like a political story with opinions and pundits. you need to look at the facts. the legalities, and you have to see how the cases are developing. we can do that right now. the man who was by trump's side for a decade, cohen had eyes and ears on personal and campaign events that could affect several big questions for investigators. cohen referred to dirty deeds, plural. what else did he cover up? speculation? no. remember the tape we played for you here? cohen said, we're paying for all

the stuff, after the president asked if it was just about the two women. what other stuff? the president is said to be seething after the sentencing. calling cohen a liar. well, if that's true, then the company behind the enquirer is lying, too, because just out today, they admit to acting with his campaign to break the law. and investigators hinted there may be more there. what more might a.m.i. ceo david pecker spill? he is cooperating. could he be even more crucial than michael cohen? we'll tell you why that could be. so much to test. we've done the work. let's get after it. this is not just about michael cohen. there is mounting evidence that federal prosecutors are zeroing in on others involved in hush money crimes to help get donald trump elected. a deal was reached with the parent company of the "national enquirer" run by a long-time friend of the president backing

up michael cohen's story and leaving the president isolated. today, cohen became the first person in the president's inner circle to be sentenced to significant jail time. he got three years for what the judge called a smor guess board of fraudulent conduct that includes crimes committed at the direction of the president, a president who still calls cohen a liar, even though his own justice department corroborates cohen's account. and so does a.m.i. it's also about lying to banks and about his taxes, that is not related to the president. now, before learning his fate, the president's former personal attorney gave a statement to the court that was full of animus for the man he once said he'd take a bullet for. he agreed with the president's take that he is weak, but, quote, for a much different reason. he said it was time and again i felt it was my duty to cover up his dirty deeds. again, plural. he will cover up for the president no more. he is still cooperating with the special counsel, and he has teed

up more to be revealed in the public in time. listen to this quote. i'm committed to proving my integrity and ensuring that history will not remember me as the villain of this story. there's lots of other news breaking in this drama with a.m.i.'s cooperation today. the feds say, listen to this language. as long as they continue to cooperate, a.m.i. won't be prosecuted. what does that mean? that suggests that it wasn't just about corroborating what cohen told them. what else could be there? what else do they know? and it says in the agreement they have to continue making the contributions and making the concessions that are asked for. so there's got to be more there. what? let's gavel cuomo's court into session. barrett burger and jim schultz. let's start with the assumption there's more. michael cohen knows more. we all know what rule 35 is under the federal court of civil procedure, that within a year,

even more actually, but within a year, investigators can come forward and say, he's been of substantial help on other things. his sentence should be reduced. every bit of language, every bit of reporting i've gotten from the people around him who say he is banking on that. do you buy it? >> i'm sure he knows more. it's an odd strategy to not give everything to the prosecutors right away in order to get sort of the full-blown cooperation agreement and to, instead, give things piecemeal and cross your fingers in a hold out for a rule 35 motion. but, of course, you can't completely rule it out. but i do agree with you, there is more out there. i think there's certainly other names that are circling, and i think there are other institutions, particularly the trump organization, that could come into the focus of this investigation. >> you know, jim, i'm as quick as anybody to shrug my shoulders, but that a.m.i. deal, you know, they have a cooperation deal, essentially, a nonprosecution deal with prosecutors. but the prosecutors went out of

their way to say, as long as you keep cooperating, as long as you keep giving us what we ask you to give us, what else is there? >> we don't know what there is. there's certainly more from cohen, and we must expect that there's more from a.m.i.. and we don't know -- it's a really strange deal, very odd. barrett was right about that on cohen. he put himself in a lot of risk by not coming to some agreement on cooperation early. and the fact that the southern district of new york hammered him today, and the judge hammered him today because, quite frankly, they don't think he helped enough. so that's telling. i don't know what's coming. none of us know what's coming, but certainly there's more. >> so, when we look at what happened today, why he got sent away, he has these unrelated offenses, there's no question about that. but it's clear federal prosecutors believe what was done to hush people up during the campaign goes beyond a lawyer and his overzealous representation. now we see a pattern, barrett.

that's why you can't look at this like a political story. i stay away from panels on this. i don't give a dam what journalists think about this. you have to look at the facts and where they can lead. you have flynn, manafort and cohen who all say now the same thing in different context. yeah, yeah, i said it, it wasn't true, shouldn't have done it. but i was talking to people at the -- fill in the blank -- administration, in the campaign, at the same time, they knew. cohen most notably saying that about doing this deal on the hush money, during his congressional testimony, that people knew about it, that he was consulting -- those people must be exposed, no? >> absolutely. i think the message you hear from all of this is that both for the campaign and for the administration, the truth just doesn't matter. you see this time and time again, people lying either on behalf of themselves, but as michael cohen said, really doing it on behalf of the president. that's a dangerous pattern and one that will certainly ensnare people like michael cohen and flynn who have fallen in to be part of it.

>> i've heard people say compellingly -- hold on, jim, i'm going to tee this up for you. cohen is a liar. they can't rely on him. the president said it didn't happen, he's president of the united states. cohen said it did, he's a liar, he's going to jail. remember the tape. we played it first. i fought like hell to get this tape because i knew it was going to be valuable down the road for the exact reason it is tonight. let me remind you of what was said. >> um, i need to open up a company for the transfer of all of that info regarding our friend david, you know, so that -- i'm going to do that right away. i've spoken to allen weisselberg about how to set the whole thing up -- >> so what are we going to do? >> with funding. >> what funding? >> we'll have to pay -- >> cash? >> no, no -- no, no, no. >> now, there's actually more to the tape. but what that showed early on, jim, was the president knew dam

well what was going on here and he knew they had to come up with a sneaky way to get it done, keep it out of the public eye, and there was nor at the end of the tape where he says we're going to deal with the women, trump says. cohen says, no, no, all the stuff. i knew when i heard about the existence of this tape i knew i had it. because i knew down the road it would become relevant and now it is. the president said first, i don't know anything about this, right? then he said it was a simple private matter. it's neither of those things, jim. >> so, what it comes down to in terms of the federal election commission issues, what did the president know? okay, let's assume for a second that the president knew that this was -- that there was going to be a transfer, that there was going to be a payment made. did he know that that was something that needed to be through the campaign? was it required to go through the campaign? the real question as to whether this is a personal payment. would this have happened irrespective of the campaign? is something the f.e.c. would look at, whether it's a personal payment. there might be other reasons.

personal reasons, he might not want that information to get out because of his businesses, personal reasons because of family. there could be a whole lot of reasons why he doesn't want this information to get out. and everybody is distinguishing the edwards issue. >> i got you. edwards, we learned a lot from you guys. edwards is not a great analogy. >> okay, but it raises the questions, okay, what did the president know, what was he advised by his lawyers as to whether or not this needed to be paid by the campaign or not. what was he advised by the campaign? did the campaign talk with folks and not the president as it relates to how this is all going to happen? these are interesting questions, but we don't know the answers. >> right, but some of them aren't the relevant questions either. john edwards is not a good example. there was time there. there was an obvious personal motivation there because of what he was dealing with with his wife. this had been something he was trying to figure out long before the period of his campaign and still got charged. he won at trial.

put up the full screen for you, barrett, to bring you in on this. in or about august 2015, david pecker, the chairman and ceo of a.m.i. met with like l cohen and at least one other member of the campaign. why is there a campaign person involved in something that was just a private matter? barrett, my point is this. i don't know if it's an f.e.c. violation. i know michael cohen pled guilty to it. i think he did that for several reasons. and i don't care. i care about the lying to federal prosecutors. the president lied to the american people about this. we know he did. i can prove it to you with that tape and his contemporaneous statements that contradict known fact. but the lying could be what exposes him all the way down the line on this and other things. that's my concern, barrett. >> yeah, absolutely. and we've seen that time and again, like you were saying earlier. it really is the cover up that is worse than the crime. that is what keeps getting

people in this case. and just to jim's point, it is important to mention it doesn't have to be the sole motive of somebody committing one of these crimes that can be for a campaign purpose. it could be a dual purpose. it could also be because you don't want to be personally embarrassed or you don't want your spouse to find out. as long as a motive that helps your campaign -- >> why would david pecker say -- why would allen weisselberg confirm it -- what i say is this. i feel for guys like you and rudy in this situation. he lied about it. these guys have no reason to lie about this. they're trying to get themselves out of trouble. david pecker, allen weisselberg, they would have like to have said nothing else but we know for a fact it was a personal matter. right, michael cohen's freedom might have hinged on that answer. >> chris, is the issue here whether the campaign has exposure or whether the president has exposure, or whether individuals on the campaign have exposure? those are the big questions and

a lot of those -- a lot of those are -- you get the answers there by the answers to the questions that i asked earlier about who had knowledge and who was advising as to how the transaction needed to take place. and fundamental question. for instance, you can't pay out of your campaign coffers for clothing and other things to bolster your -- to bolster -- >> bran dish -- >> they're considered personal. >> i wouldn't hyper analyze it. the reason i'm bringing this out and i wanted your minds to put to it and you served us excellently, thank you, it's about the lying. he lied about it. i don't care if it's a crime or not. i don't think he's going to be prosecuted. but i'm telling you, i wanted this tape when i heard about it because this is -- this president lies about one thing the way he lies about everything. and these are federal prosecutors. i don't need to tell you guys this. this is your world they come from. you can't lie to them the way that you lie to us. and i'm worried that that is the

story we're all going to have to tell down the road. jim, barrett, thank you for helping me put meat on the bones. i'll bring you back when we learn more. we all know that's going to happen. barrett berger, jim schultz. we've got to look deeper in this. there are certain arguments you can make. to hide it from his wife, understandable. also to kind of help his campaign. that's about legal analysis. i'm looking at something broader investigatively. the president has a pattern of saying things that aren't true to protect himself. that's fine here, it's fine if he wants to play you for a sucker and deal with it in the campaign. not with federal investigators. what more could be coming from michael cohen that exposes that the president knew things that he won't own? he says michael cohen, i ain't going down as the villain. there are many more ways he could damage the president, or at least expose the president to have to own things he doesn't want to. i will lay them out for you next.

we can't do it! i'm telling you, it can't be done! we are doing it! it's the holidays! t-mobile is offering the awesome iphone xr, with unlimited, for just 40 bucks a month. wooooo! unlimited, with the new iphone xr included? no one else is doing that! so they get unlimited, with iphone xr included, for just 40 bucks? the new iphone xr, that's bananas! at t-mobile get unlimited with iphone xr included for just 40 dollars. ♪ can you feel it ♪ can you feel it put a smile on everyone's face this holiday,

with great gifts from amazon. with low prices and free shipping on millions of items, for everything you need this holiday, visit amazon.

michael cohen, the president's former personal attorney, is set to spend three years in prison, maybe. i know what the judge said, but it's not over. the sentence could change based on what more michael cohen can offer, and there's reason to believe he can do exactly that. in court, cohen said, recently, okay, the president tweeted a statement calling me weak, and he was correct. but for a much different reza -- reason than he was implying. it was because time and time again i felt it was my duty to cover up his dirty deeds. dirty deeds. it makes you think about a. cdc. but these were not done cheap. what are the dirty deeds? we know he spent hundreds of thousands of dollars on some of them. as trump's long-time lawyer and personal pitbull, the samantha

-- the man was excluded from nothing, including these key events in the mueller investigation, all right. the trump tower meeting. we know don junior expected to get damaging information on hillary clinton. but the question remains, how much did the president know about that meeting before or after? remember, at that time the campaign was being run out of the trump tower offices. trump was there with the president literally at his seat every day. what does cohen know as a set of eyes and ears, right at the feet of the president for months, as this was all going on? then you have the trump's long-sought real estate deal in moscow. it was going on or ten plus years they were trying to get it done. it wasn't some new fickle thing. it wasn't cohen off on a lark. it was real. and it showed the extent of the trump organization's communications with russia. cohen has admitted he initially lied to congress about how long negotiations went on. who knew he would lie? remember, he says in his proffer, and mueller says it in there, that he's been helpful with the coordination and

development of that testimony. who did it did it with? does it include people close to the president, does it include the president himself? were the talks that wernt on until june 2016 the same month the tower meeting took place why trump was so friendly with russia from the get go? uh now today, trump's hush money payments were confirmed as campaign efforts by american media, inc. that's the company that publishes the "national enquirer." here's what they say. the company paid 150 grand to keep former play boy karen mcdougal's play boy play mate her claims of an affair with trump quiet. remember trump repeatedly denied he knew anything about that payment until cohen's attorney gave us this recording. >> and i've spoken to allen weisselberg about how to set the whole thing up with -- >> what are we going to pay? >> funding -- yes, and it's all the stuff --

>> all the stuff. what's all the stuff? hold the prompter. let's just be very clear about something. i don't care about any of this personally. you can judge me morally if you want. that's fine. i'm not in that business. i don't care if it's an f.e.c. violation or a crime. i still don't know how they indict a sitting president of the united states given the current guidance. they can change the guidance, but i don't know that's going to happen. i'm talking about the lying. we know the president was lying about this 100%. if he lied like this to federal prosecutors about what he knew and how close things get to him and what else was covered up, it could be a problem. what could all the stuff be that a.m.i. had? why do prosecutors say they're not going to prosecute a.m.i. as long as a.m.i. coops with them and gives them what they need. what else is there? what other knowledge on this subject other than these two women? reportedly s.d.n.y., southern district of new york, say there

may be more criminal exposure here. that's what they say. that's got to come down to truth telling on some level. in cohen's court filings, prosecutors mentioned several unnamed trump organization executives and employees involved in the scheme to pay cohen back for the hush money payments. we know from the tape and we know from reporting one of those is allen weisselberg, the cfo. he's cooperating. who else? the only people who can authorize those kind of payments are the president himself, the children, or the organization cfo, allen weisselberg. and he's cooperating. who else or what else did a.m.i. cover up? who else was in on this? what else is the president denying? what did he deny to mueller? mueller didn't ask him any questions about before the election. the more people go down for lying, the less likely others are to keep up a lie. remember that. one of the reasons that the mueller probe -- let's use the right word -- rewarded michael flynn is because he came forward

early and they said in their papers, when others would not. the more people go down, the less people hold up lies because they get scared. odds are cohen has more to share, there is more to learn. if the president continues to lie as a first response, it seems reflex with him. the more the lies effect a federal investigation the higher the price the president may have to pay. that's why i'm interested in this stuff. the patterns of mendacity. as president nixon taught us during watergate, it is not the crime, it is the cover up that gets you. will the lies come back to haunt this president? and will his boasting about shutting down the government be the win he thinks it will be? great stuff for a debate. great debaters. navarro and cortez next. ♪ there's no place like home ♪

argh! i'm trying... ♪

yippiekiyay. ♪ mom. ♪ michael cohen received a prison sentence today of three years. he's also implicating the president in crimes. how is trump feeling about his one-time personal attorney putting him on the spot like this? according to a source, the president doesn't like it. he's seething with rage insisting cohen is a liar. if he's lying, why do federal prosecutors believe him? why do the people who he did the transactions work echo his claims? why did a federal judge echo his plea on those bases?

are they all wrong? we start our great debate with anna navarro and steve cortez. the yours truly of who is lying here. i believe it is the central question because we're talking about a federal investigation, not a political matter. lying is different in politics. it's about how good you are at it, how much you do of it, what it exposes you to. not with federal prosecutors. what do you make of the mendacity moment we're having? >> it's surreal. it really is like being stuck in some sort of latin american surrealism novel by garcia marques. look, of course donald trump has to be bothered. of course, he needs to be nervous. anybody getting investigated should be nervous. and particularly, there are so many people in your close orbit who are cooperating and are talking. i think the problem that donald trump has here is that when you've got people who have been

as close to him as the cfo of his company, alan and michael cohen, michael cohen was his personal lawyer for over a decade. you realize that's more time than he spent with at least one of his three wives, right? married to one of his three wives. he knows michael cohen and michael cohen knows him. michael cohen knows where the dirty laundry is. not only that, michael cohen has receipts. the important part about the tape you obtained several weeks ago is the fact michael cohen is showing he has receipts. remember, they raided his office, they raided his hotel room. they got the paperwork. i guess the reason they are believing somebody has lied in the past is because there is corroborating truth and corroborating evidence not only in what he has, but what some of the other people are saying you've got a deal here where you've got two liars -- donald trump is a liar, we've seen him lie time and time and time again and michael cohen has lied time

and time and time again. but now michael cohen, the guy who is going to take the bullet has the gunpointing at him and is in a real bind and i bet you he's got some evidence. he's got more to show than just his work. >> sources close to him say that's exactly what's going on, that he has more to tell. it is of relevance to congress, relevance to the merrill probe on all that, steve. just to be clear, i'm not saying the president is guilty of campaign finance. i don't think it's a stretch. that's not my point. when you're dealing with a federal investigation, the rules aren't like what they are here. i find you guys to be honest, and they're not the rules of politics. if you lie to federal investigators, that's what i'm wondering, are you worried for the president on that level? >> i'm not, and i'm glad you're making that distinction by the way. all politicians stretch the truth to be cliend all -- to be kind. all politicians do, including this president.

but stretching the truth in a political realm is not a crime. lying to investigators, lying under oath is a crime. that's what michael cohen did and had to plead guilty to. mueller told congress he lied to them in the sentencing proffer. this is a known liar. a snake who betrayed the president who secretly recorded his own client -- taping his houfl how awful he's taping his client. client, unbeknownst to the client. it shows you what kind of character he is -- >> or it shows you how worried he was. he goes out of his way to name allen weisselberg. some part of him thought, this is some dirty stuff, i better cover myself because this man won't cover me, and he's right. >> as you know, as a lawyer he has an obligation to not do those things. >> true. >> the s.d.n.y. tries to say that he directed -- the president, then candidate trump then directed him to commit a felony. i would flip that the other way.

he was relying on his lawyer for good legal advice. if his lawyer gave him what is an illegal path, i don't think it is. for the sake of argument if the s.d.n.y. is right, his lawyer gave him an illegal path, that's as much on the lawyer as the client. >> anna, when you listen to the tape -- i knew it was going to be instructive just on the line. there's too much there, because there's too much weird language used. i knew there was suggestion it involved campaign officials. that's the worst fact in terms of the federal election violation. it didn't involve cohen, there was an election official involved. i know what they're going to say, campaign violations, that's what this is about? no, it's about the president's pattern of lying to in response to questions by investigators. we know he was lawyered up, but he has good lawyers. he put it in writing because he was afraid to face mueller man-to-man and deal with it under oath. he didn't want to expose himself to his mouth so he did it in writing.

we don't know if they got their story right because we don't know if he knew what mueller knew from manafort and cohen. >> it's obvious bob mueller has been doing a lot of homework. he's been setting this case up and he's been doing so with, you know, minutiae in mind. listen, chris, i don't think the american people or the american political class has got the stomach, just a little squeamish about going after a guy over sexual pick dill lows. means campaign violations. we saw it with clinton. he committed perjury over sexual p icad ilos. john edwards was indicted for campaign violation. when i hear about it, it almost reminds me of al capone where they couldn't quite make the case for something else. >> they get you on your taxes. >> they couldn't get him on

something else so they got him on the taxes. that's what this is looking like. we don't know what else there is. and from so many people in trump's closed orbit talking and cooperating, closed orbit for so long -- look, in politics, in life, in business, the people around the principal are a very accurate reflection of that principal. you see it all the time. so the reason that he is surrounded by all these rats is because he's a rat. >> look, that's what he's going to have to answer for. questions about -- who told flynn to talk to kislyak? did flynn just do that on his own? two weeks they were processing that situation. what did the president know, what did those around him know about flynn? he didn't do this on his own. he didn't want to blow his representation up. he's a family guy. a character guy. what people, what did the president know, who was meeting with manafort, why?

that stuff gets sticky, steve, and it gets sticky fast. >> right. chris, i'll be the first to say, there's so much we don't know. i'd like the people to know all of that which is why i would tell certainly mueller to quote the fabulous thunder birds. wrap it up. this has been two years. it is time for him to issue his report and put his cards on the table. a slow drip and inuendo. on team trump we have been boxes ghosts for long. it's hanging like a cloud. it's time for mueller to put the cards on the table and us not to be emotional. anna called him a rat, compared him to a murder rust racist, a pig. enough of the smearing and name calling. we can talk about this like adults. you may really disagree. he's the president. >> be nice if the president shared your sentiments.

>> tell you what, when you tell the president to stop calling black athletes sons of pitches, when you tell the president to stop calling maxine waters and other congress people dumb as rocks, when you start telling the president to stop insulting don lemon and lebron james and people like me, then maybe, maybe, maybe i will listen to you. but until you do that, don't come here and lecture me on how i should talk when you got -- when you are a -- >> i just did. >> -- a follower and supporter of a guy who insults all sorts of americans for no other reason than not agreeing with him. >> if i called, if i were to call barack obama -- i would be fired by the commercial break, okay. yet you're allow today call donald trump that and i think it is insanely disrespegtful. it's revealing -- it's revealing of the obsession that you and many have where you are incapable of looking at the president and judging the president on true merit rather than just on your emotion. and that's why i'm saying lay the facts out so we can take a

cold dispassionate look. >> i judge him on the children at the border. i judge him on calling african countries shut holes. that haitians have aids. i judge him on calling athletes sons of pitches. i judge him on telling nancy pelosi to shut up. him calling lebron james, somebody who has done much more than he dumb as a rock. i judge him equating neo-nazis to those protesting against them. >> and breathe. okay? i let it go a little bit because there's a lot of emotion in this. steve, look, you're hoisted on your own pitard. the bomb you wear you go up with it. you can't ask for decency because the man you support falls below the level we set. the lower it gets he doesn't meet it. when he decides to lead on that issue, it will give him and his supporters high ground to ask others to do the same. your song i like, the fabulous thunder birds. remember the second line, wrap

it up, i'll take it. will you be ready to take it when mueller offers up what he has? steve, look, i appreciate you being here. >> i'm an american before a trump supporter. >> we'll see. anna navarro, thank you very much. to bothful you, have a good night. whew. the president declared he was totally cleared after federal prosecutors implicated him in campaign finance crimes. at the time i said, he's never been more wrong. i got attacked for t. we all know he was wrong and we're only one step into the process. we want to talk about what is a crime and what isn't when it comes to campaign finance. you need to talk to this man. he was the f.e.c. commissioner. what is a crime? what isn't? what do you need to show? and what legal questions does he have going forward? perfect guest. thank you for being here, sir. be with him in a second. with all the selection you'll find at bass pro shops and cabela's, deciding on the perfect gift

can be challenging. ♪ [instrumental "oh christmas tree"] that's why we've made it easy with a selection of gift cards for everyone on your holiday list. ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪

what do we know for sure? michael cohen's going to jail, in part, for his role with the two campaign finance violations. what's not clear is what else trump's long-time personal lawyer knows and did for his boss who is now president. he pledged today, michael cohen, to continue to assist investigators to make matters worse for the president, his favorite tabloid company has flipped on him, too, admitting it helped the trump campaign make a hush money payment and in no uncertain terms, they said we did this to help his campaign. let's talk about this with trevor potter, president of the nonpartisan campaign legal center, a former republican chair of the f.e.c. it's great to have you, sir. >> thank you. good to be here. >> merry christmas in advance. okay. so, under these facts as you understand them, exposure for the president? >> i think clear down the line legal exposure. you and i both know the justice

department has a current policy that it would not indict a sitting president. so he is basically in the situation that richard nixon was in watergate of being an unindicted participate in all of this. what they called then a coconspirator. >> he is individual one. >> he is individual one. and according to cohen's testimony, he directed what cohen did. >> and a.m.i., the parent company, and david pecker, his friend, seems to suggest the same. they also have allen weisselberg, the cfo who was involved in this. he's been cooperating. who knows what he's been saying? the push back from the president's attorneys? >> well, today's big news is the a.m.i. because we read this in the press. it had not been confirmed by the prosecutors. and the importance of that is there is now someone other than cohen. for a while, the president has been saying basically he's a liar and there's no proof. it's my word against his. now you have a corporation and its executives, plural

apparently, who were in meetings with candidate trump and cohen, and a lot of conversations -- and we know from the reporting that there are e-mails, there are texts, so forth. we don't know if there are tapes on it, but there is now suddenly a lot of corroboration of the facts here that go beyond just what cohen says happened. >> right. and we know the tape that we've had of cohen talking to trump about this and saying that it was all being set up, trump says to him, so we're going to do that to pay for the women. and he says, no, all the stuff. so that takes us to this next question, which is s.d.n.y., southern district of new york, seems to think there's more there with a.m.i. you've got a nonprosecution agreement as long as you continue to cooperate. and as long as you continue to give us what we ask you for. what else is there? they just put the guy in jail. they're not going to do that with a.m.i. or david pecker. what is the rest? >> well, of course, partly we don't know so we're speculating. >> right.

>> what we do know is that cohen has said in his plea agreement that he coordinated his activities with senior officials of the campaign. presumably a.m.i. was in those discussions as well because part of the deal here is that a.m.i. would purchase the story, front the money, which is itself a campaign violation because it's corporate funds, it can't be used for this, would be reimbursed. there was an agreement all drawn up, a phony invoice that was going to say it was for services rendered. >> trump said he never paid them back. you can't prove that he knew that this was money that his campaign was supposed to pay but didn't. he relied on his lawyer for that. and you have to show that in his head he knew that he was doing this in violation of that law and you have none of that. >> so, you start with the question with what does ami say about that, we know -- we're in some

of the meetings with trump because going all the way back to 2014, there was a personal meeting between pecker and trump where a.m.i. said it would be helpful to his campaign -- not to donald trump as a new york real estate developer. so you start there. and so the question becomes, in those conversations, can a.m.i. tell us what was said about why they were doing it in october of the election year? why it was so important to do it in a rush? and, of course, the question is can they say anything that ties it directly to candidate trump, now candidate trump as opposed to just cohen. we don't know that yet. >> another push back, john edwards, same thing, he beat it at trial. this is the same thing john edwards did. >> you start with the fact that john edwards was indicted, prosecuted for this. that a federal judge held that this was a crime, if committed by edwards, so it could go to the jury. paying hush money to somebody.

the factual difference is, i think here, are harmful to trump. because the factual differences are the edwards payments were to someone who had just had his child. >> right. >> and so edwards argued it was child support. there was no threat to go to the press by her. there was no hush money agreement. there was no, i'll give you the money if you sign something saying you won't tell anyone. it's set up as a support payment at a time before the first primary had even occurred. in fact, the last payment is made as he's leaving the race. >> right. >> as opposed to the trump situation where it's in october. >> i think you do a great job of distinguishing the facts of the two cases. thank you for doing that. >> well, i think the jury would do a -- would look at these facts and say they're quite different. >> right. >> the key thing in the edwards prosecution, which i think the president's lawyers ignore, is

the judge specifically found as a matter of law that it wasn't sufficient to say that one of the reasons that edwards did this was so his wife wouldn't know. the judge said if any of this decision was made to influence the campaign, that's enough for there to be a violation. >> now, let me ask you something. you're not coming at this as some crazy lefty who wants to see the president go down. when you look at the overall probe, what are your concerns going forward? >> well, you just have a sense looking at this, all of these prosecutors. mueller and the southern district of new york know a lot more than we know, and there are other shoes to drop. so i worry that we are seeing piece by piece people coming forward who are going to be put into position where they are going to be questioned by prosecutors, and either have to tell the truth in a way that will be harmful to the president

and show that he has lied about all of these matters, and may provide evidence that he has broken the law in a criminal fashion, that he knew what he was doing. or if they lie, they would be prosecuted for lying. and the people we're talking about at this stage are the people that cohen referred to as senior officials of the campaign. now, who were those? there's manafort, until he left. a lot of this happened after he left. but it's the president's son-in-law. it's don junior. the president's legal counsel. there were a lot of people who qualify as senior members of the campaign who may have been part of these conversations with a.m.i. that's what we don't know, but you can be guaranteed that's what the prosecutors have already been looking at. they're close to the president. >> thoughtful and thankful. i appreciate having you on the show. best for christmas. we'll do it again. >> appreciate it, thanks. >> so, we're learning lots of

new things about the president, including a secret just revealed by his son don junior. this is a turn towards some levy -- levity just so we can all take a breath next. if your moderate to severe ulcerative colitis

or crohn's symptoms are holding you back, and your current treatment hasn't worked well enough it may be time for a change. ask your doctor about entyvio®, the only biologic developed and approved just for uc and crohn's. entyvio® works at the site of inflammation in the gi tract, and is clinically proven to help many patients achieve both symptom relief and remission. infusion and serious allergic reactions can happen during or after treatment. entyvio® may increase risk of infection, which can be serious. pml, a rare, serious, potentially fatal brain infection caused by a virus may be possible. tell your doctor if you have an infection experience frequent infections or have flu-like symptoms, or sores. liver problems can occur with entyvio®. if your uc or crohn's treatment isn't working for you, ask your gastroenterologist about entyvio®. entyvio®. relief and remission within reach.

all right. i have a pretty heavy closing for you tonight. let's have a bit of breather in between. christmas is the time of gift giving. it's also the time of re-gifting. let's be honest. you know people who do it. my family, i don't think anybody does it more. but the president? does he regift? you don't have to take my word for it. you can listen to his own son. >> i'm the name sake, so i got regifted all of the things that were monogrammed for him at times. so there was one christmas where he may or may not have given me the gift that i had given him the year before because i monogrammed it, and it was like oh, here. i know you didn't get this. how do you know this? because i gave it to you last year. >> not an easy guy to pin down.

d. lemon, the regifter in chief. do you give him a pass? >> yeah, of course. i don't mind regifting. it sounds weird. i don't really care about gifts. like i have everything that i want, and so nobody -- no one ever has to give me a gift. i won't be insulted or whatever. you can take your money and spend it on other people, spend it on better things. but also i'm the worst gifter of all. because i wait until the last minute or wait so late that i don't buy one. the last two years you didn't get a christmas present, chris. >> you ever regift me anything? >> no, i didn't regift you at all. i don't regift. i'm a terrible gift giver. >> i don't regift. i have been regifted. in my family it's rampant. >> is it can ls? >> i love candles. my father would get this stuff with cuomo on it. and my brother gets stuff with

cuomo on it. they would hand it onto you. or give you nice plates or something. on the back you see what it is. my mother she's the most generous person. she is a regifting renegade. and the family laughs about it. it was a will the of nice stuff. it wasn't socks. >> it is about the thought. it's a cliche. it is about the thought. >> now i'm desperate for that stuff. anything from my pop i want. >> you let me borrow your pops pocket square. which was kind. everywhere i go do you know what people talk about? >> the hand off between us on the show. >> every single place. i was at the event tonight in town. i saw the former president. everybody was calling the forever president barack obama. he looks good. i don't have a care in the world. >> no stress. >> that's all people talk about.

i'm sorry you're sick. i saw you and chris talking. you're bromance. i don't like the guy at all. >> listen. you're smart enough to know who's out of your depth. i respect it's real brother, they know we're friends. we're just crazy enough to do it the same way on tv. >> nanchuck went over well. >> yours was great. nanchuck was perfect. >> i'm going to be better. just because we did this i'm going to be better at gifting this year. i'm still not good at christmas cards. >> i'll see you at the top of

the show. >> we've got a lot coming up. i won't even go there. you shocked me. you're a bad dad. get out of here. >> i want to get back to what really is heavy here tonight. again, i'm not trying to dismiss legal exposure. i'm trying to be practical about what happens in these kinds of investigations. when you lie, you lose with federal investigators. you see it time and again. what did flynn get? it's just lying. that's all it was. there was no deeper crime. they let him go on lobbying stuff, trump, you're going to see cohen. so i'm going to show you where it can lead next. [woman 1] this... [woman 2] ..this... [man 1] ...this is my body of proof.

[man 2] proof of less joint pain... [woman 3] ...and clearer skin. [man 3] proof that i can fight psoriatic arthritis... [woman 4] ...with humira. [woman 5] humira targets and blocks a specific source of inflammation that contributes to both joint and skin symptoms. it's proven to help relieve pain, stop further irreversible joint damage, and clear skin in many adults. humira is the number one prescribed biologic for psoriatic arthritis. [avo] humira can lower your ability to fight infections. serious and sometimes fatal infections, including tuberculosis, and cancers, including lymphoma, have happened, as have blood, liver, and nervous system problems, serious allergic reactions, and new or worsening heart failure. tell your doctor if you've been to areas where certain fungal infections are common and if you've had tb, hepatitis b, are prone to infections, or have flu-like symptoms or sores. don't start humira if you have an infection. [woman 6] ask your rheumatologist about humira. [woman 7] go to mypsaproof.com to see proof in action. this is big! t-mobile is offering the awesome iphone xr,

with an unlimited plan, for just $40 bucks a month. unlimited. with the new iphone xr?! yeah! iphone xr included. for $40 bucks?! that is big.

♪ there's no place likargh!e ♪ i'm trying... ♪ yippiekiyay. ♪ mom. ♪ we are told the president is seething and calling michael cohen a liar. that is a common response from

him about his former lawyer. >> what he's trying to do is get a reduced sentence, so he's lying about a project that everybody knew about. he's got himself a big prison sentence, and he's trying to get a much lesser prison sentence by making up a story. so very simply, michael cohen is lying. >> it's not new as a tactic, but i've always harped on the president's lying, and now you're going to see why. investigators like the ones involved here feed on lies, and the president is exposed to more trouble from the southern district and the broader mueller probe because of his insistence on denying what can now be shown as fact. take the instant situation. what could cohen be lying about with respect to the president? did cohen pay the women to help himself? it's absurd. did he lie about the president knowing? we played you the tape on this show, which prosecutors have and which proves 100% that trump knew. here was the lie. >> mr. president, did you know about the $130,000 payment to

stormy daniels? >> no. no. >> then why did michael cohen make it if there was no truth to the allegation? >> well, you'll have to ask michael cohen. michael is my attorney, and you'll have to ask michael cohen. >> do you know where he got the money to make that payment? >> i don't know, no. >> he lied. the tape proves it. ami, the enquirer's parent company, confirmed it to investigators. they hid the stories to help the campaign, and the president knew, and he lied. the president's cover stories have gotten more obvious now that he has to own the obvious truth that he was all about the payments during the campaign. he tells a new cover story. it was a simple, private transaction. only a civil case. he could have paid these women off a long time ago if it was just to keep it private, but he did it during the campaign, and there was nothing simple about it. cohen had dummy corporations. he had a financing scheme. ami had a whole system of hiding and cutting deals, taking payments. that's that. that has nothing to do with

russia. well, let's look at russia. is cohen lying about trying to get this deal? then why do the investigators have so many communications from him with russians about trying to get this deal that might have involved financing from russian institutions that were under sanctions? why did the president sign the letter of intent? why did the president say to you that he decided not to do the deal himself if there never was a deal? this was the lie. >> i have nothing to do with russia. to the best of my knowledge, no person that i deal with does. >> best of my knowledge. that's not true either even as a hedge. you see, calling things a lie or fake appears to be this president's way of saying that something threatens him, of trying to make it go away. it doesn't work with federal prosecutors. flynn, manafort, and now cohen all say that while they were doing what they were doing, they're lying. they were in touch with people close to the president, sometimes the president himself. what did cohen say to mueller about what he knew? his lawyers are good. so what did the president say in his responses?

he's got good lawyers. but did he coordinate a story with manafort or cohen or flynn? they had some joint defense agreements for a while, but not the whole time. did they coordinate a story that mueller later disproved without his lawyers knowing? what did cohen hear him say about wikileaks? about the trump tower meeting? what did flynn tell him about his calls with the russians? who asked michael flynn to do those? if he lies about these things, the prosecutors can expose it. is it a crime? who knows? but we know for sure it can lay out damning facts that can test our elected officials and the rest of us as well. we may be about to have a real conversation in this country about the value of truth and its connection to justice. president nixon, he wound up foretelling his own fall when he said on tape, it's not the crime, it's the cover-up that gets you. lying to insulate yourself can be a trap. that's what this president faces now, and he is particularly vulnerable to this because of a habit he has developed over

many, many years. the president lies as a reflex. sometimes it works. sometimes it doesn't. he does a dance of hyperbole for his rallies that is intoxicating to them. he does it with the media in a way that they chase and are effective about it. but at the end of the day in this context, it spells nothing but trouble. thanks for all of us tonight. thanks for watching. "cnn tonight with don lemon" starts right now. >> my mom says, tell chris your sister -- i won't say her name, my sister, who does hair by the way, your sister is a regifter with gifts she gets from her clients. so there's a lot of regifters out there. >> i think it's fine. >> you do? >> i think as long as you're giving, it's all good. i thought she was going to say something about my hair. >> no. not everybody is obsessed with you as you are, chris. listen, let's talk about michael cohen. >> yes. >> michael cohen gets to go to

prison for being, according to the prosecutors -- for doing what donald trump told him to do. >> there's no question that if michael cohen weren't connected to the president of the united states, he would not be in this situation today. it's not to say that he didn't two things that are wrong. he admits that. it's not to say he didn't do things that are wrong that are unrelated to his role with the president. but there was a hyperfocus on him. they were harsh on him. they wanted him to cooperate. he didn't give them what they wanted, at least not soon enough, and he's paying a big price. >> can you imagine, though, you're the attorney. you're being guided by your client, do whatever you think is right, what have you. then you do it, and all of a sudden you end up going to jail, but your client does not end up going to jail, or the person that directed you to do it doesn't end up going to jail, or not even that. doesn't face any repercussions