unconstitutional. a federal judge in texas strikes down obamacare. the law stands for now but will it survive this latest legal challenge? the special counsel isn't done. cnn learns robert mueller still wants to interview the president. and cnn is in guatemala with the family of the little girl who died in the custody of u.s. border patrol. live from the cnn center here in atlanta, i'm cyril vanier. it is great to have you. at this hour, the law that brought health care to millions of americans has been struck down by a u.s. judge. affordable care act or obamacare

as its known it was barack obama's signature piece of legislation but a judge has ruled it unconstitutional. right now it remains in effect. that means those who want it can still sign-up, but that ends in just hours on saturday evening. if the judge's decision is upheld many may end up losing their health care. president donald trump who tried to repeal this legislation earlier in his presidency ruled it was not surprising and was great news for america. why the top in the house promises to reject the republican efforts to destroy the affordable care act. >> former assistant attorney in los angeles david katz joins me for an in-depth look at this. what's different this time around? >> well, there were about 70

efforts to repeal it. it's also been litigated. it's gone up to the united states supreme court, and it's been affirmed. but that was the earlier version. so what just happened now is not going to be the last step, but it's a troubling first judicial step. it's troubling for 130 million americans with pre-existing conditions. it's very disturbing to 12 million people who are on obamacare as of 2018. and tomorrow is their signup day, so it's critical people realize they need to go tomorrow and sign-up because this is not the last word and many people think the appeals will succeed and that this district court, trial court ruling will be struck down. >> so obamacare has been found -- you say obamacare was affirmed. it was found to be legal by the supreme court and lower courts. the individual mandate, because that's what's at issue here, the individual mandate was found to be legal by the supreme court.

and finding people who did thought purchase people who did not purchase health care, that's the individual mandate, that was also legal. but once that fine was set at 0 by congress as it has been, then this whole thing becomes illegal? that's the basis for the judge's thinking, right? >> well, the republicans tried to get rid of obamacare. the aca, a million different ways. and if these zealots were really clever maybe they did it. maybe they booby trapped it in a way that the judge said, you know what, now the whole package is unconstitutional. but that's very dubious, cyril, whether that's really going to stand up. >> detail the argument for me. i want to make sure i understand it. >> the argument goes like this. the supreme court ruled 5-4 that the aca was constitutional not because the commerce clause there were five votes to say it was no good, it was unconstitutional under our

federalist commerce clause. but five justice were willing to say including chief adjustjusti roberts it was a tax. >> if we consider the individual mandate as a tax, then that is legal? >> yes, that certainly was the ruling 5-4 that it functioned as a tax. that if you didn't buy the insurance, you had to pay a tax. and that was within the taxing power of the united states federal government even though -- >> so what changed this texas federal judge? >> well, as of next year there is no more individual mandate. that was what the republicans put in the new aca, and so that's why i say maybe they have booby trapped it in a way that at least satisfied that trial judge down in texas. now, mind you there's 1,000 trial judges in america. this case was in front of the dream judge, the go-to judge for the zealots who were challenging obamacare. and the case was heard by a

judge who's ruled against obamacare provisions before. he's a conservative republican appointed by george w. bush. and as i say this particular judge had ruled agains obamacare, so people don't think it's a total accident that the state attorneys general ended up in front of him. and then the trump administration refused to defend the legislation although it's the law of the land. that's why democratic states governors and attorneys general came in like california's and defended it. so that's who the appellants are going to be. and of course pelosi said that the democrats once they're in power are also going to ask to intervene in the lawsuit. so it'll be as appellants the ones challenging what the texas trial judge just did, it'll be the house of representatives once it's democratic and a couple of states like california with their states attorneys general and planning that other

state citizens can't get obamacare and this ruling is wrong to throw out obamacare. >> this comes from the white house statement, this law stands as we speak, right? the quote is this from this statement. we expect this ruling will be appealed through the supreme court pending the appeal process, though, the law remains in place. so that's important for everyone to know. we don't have a conclusion right now. the law is still what it is and what it was before this ruling. look, donald trump has appointed two conservative justices to the supreme court. does that mean if this case goes all the way back to the supreme court it is more likely to be struck down than last time? >> well, it's a little frightening as i say in terms of the people who need this care. we don't want to return to the days -- republicans say we're going to return to the days when people had choice. but the reality was 20 million americans, poor americans, in particular people who had pre-existing conditions, the only choice they had was to go

to the emergency room and hope they could get care when they were -- >> but there's a matter of law in this new supreme court with a new bench? >> well, scalia voted with the four. so gorsuch or kavanaugh will vote as scalia did, let's say. the question is will one of them vote like kennedy? if one of them votes like kennedy there's the four. then what will chief justice roberts do? you have to look at the new law as a whole. and i don't buy it that it's not a tax. i believe it's still a tax. it still has punitive aspects if you don't get it if you look at the law as a whole. on top of that i've always thought they were wrong about the commerce clause. if you look at the new act i believe it is within the commerce clause. in america the idea is that the states have all these rights and they retained a lot of rights and the federal government has to be careful not to encroach on the states. but the idea of controlling health care, it's the biggest

part of the economy. it's a huge part. the idea they're reaching into everyone's life regarding some trivial matter, this is the most important matter in many, many peoples lives, their health care. >> david katz, thank you so much. >> my pleasure, thank you. cnn has learned that special counsel robert mueller still wants to speak with president trump, but his lawyers are dead set against it. pamela brown has the details from washington. >> reporter: special counsel robert mueller's team continues to be interested in interviewing the president, two sources familiar with the matter tell me. now mueller stance on interviewing the president has been constant for a year and a half. we're told nothing has changed in that sense from the first day the sources said. the president and his lawyers are still very much opposed to any potential interview. in the weeks since the president responded to written questions, mostly regarding collusion and the time period before the inauguration, these sources said. and the two sides have agreed to

hold off on discussing any interview while the president wrote responses to the questions, which were returned just before thanksgiving. that was seen as a first step to concluding more than a year of back and forth between the two sides. and the president's lawyers had hoped it would bring mueller closer to finishing his probe. but we're told mueller's talk with the president continues and it includes asking questions about the pez aboutpri the president's state mind. and asked if mueller had follow up questions to the written responses, the source declined to comment. now the president's attorney rudy giuliani reiterated that opposition to me stressing the mistrust by the president's lawyers of mueller's investigation in their view. he said i am pretty disgusted with them. the office of the special counsel declined to comment.

pamela brown, cnn, washington. >> i will not be the villain of his story, the words of michael cohen. donald trump's former attorney gave his first interview since pleading guilty in a case stemming from the russia probe and he told abc news he's done being loyal to the u.s. president. he said friday that his then boss directed him to pay hush money to women who alleged affairs with mr. trump. he said the scheme was directly tied to mr. trump's presidential ambitions. >> he's saying very clearly that he never directed you to do anything wrong. is that true? >> i don't think there's anybody that believes that. first of all, nothing at the trump organization was ever done unless it was run through mr. trump. >> he was trying to hide what you were doing, correct? >> correct. >> and he knew it was wrong? >> of course. >> and he was doing that to help his election? >> he -- you have to remember at what point in time that this matter came about, two weeks or so before the election, post the

billy bush comments. so, yes, he was very concerned about how this would affect the election. >> president trump denies ordering those payments but cohen says he's lying and prosecutors have evidence supporting his claims. meanwhile, president trump has picked an acting white house chief of staff. there he is. he announced mick mulvaney will take the job at the end of the year after current chief of staff john kelly leaves. a senior administration official says there's no time limit for mulvaney to remain as chief of staff. cnn political commentator and republican strategist alice stuart joins me now. she's also the former communications director for ted cruz who ran against donald trump in 2016 and more recently against beto o'rourke for a senate seat in texas. that will become relevant later on in this conversation.

let's start with mick mulvaney. he'll be the acting chief of staff now for donald trump. do you think this changes anything to the trump presidency? >> not really, cyril. i think evidently two jobs weren't enough for him so he needed to have one more. we always knew this was an unconventional presidency. and in terms of who holds what job and what job title people have, this is going to be different than what we've seen in the past and i wouldn't be surprised if we keep him in this interim position for quite some time. i will say this, of all the names that have been run out there in terms of who would fill the slot mulvaney is a good one. he's been a loyal soldier to president trump in whatever position he has had. he is a good advocate for this president and his policies and and he's someone certainly very well respected amongst the staff. >> so loyal and respected but not a heavyweight.

crist christy was in the running and he withdrew his name. nick ayers made some waves earlier, some high profile congressmen as well. he flies under the radar when you compare. >> and that's not a bad thing. this person who fills this role is going to be different than when the president came in. with all going on certainly as we're moving closer to 2020 this person has to be someone who can work with congress and understand the legislative aspect of the role. he has to be political and manage those aspects as we're moving towards 2020, and now that the mueller probe is really tightening and he has to understand the investigative part of the role moving forward and work with the staff to oversee the staff, the staff part of that role. so this is -- the dynamics have changed with the administration, which means the dynamics of the chief of staff are changing. so you don't need to be heavy-handed. you just need to be able to do exactly what the president

wants. >> absolutely. work with the staff and first and foremost work with this president. the president tweeted, for the record there are many people who wanted to be white house chief of staff. mick m. will do the right job. that's sort of eyebrow raising when you know three people withdrew their names. it's been a terrible week for the president. nobody wanted to be his chief of staff for a while. his former associates falling one by one. we saw michael cohen going to jail after implicating the president now in felonies. donald trump's friend david pecker at ami cooperating with investigators. trump's ininaugural committee has been under investigation. has this been one of the worst weeks for the president so far? >> i think a lot of fridays that is a statement of the week. >> i have asked the statement before. >> but this has been a certainly busy and troublesome week as the mueller probe zeros in. but i can tell you this, i was

at the white house today for the meetings, and i can tell you that the staff there are focused on their mission at hand. whether they're dealing with the economy and creating jobs and pushing that agenda or whether they're focusing on immigration and building the wall or whether they're looking at foreign policy issues. they are not being sid tracked by a lot of what they view as the palace intrigue as to who fills what position. >> it's beyond palace intrigue when we're talking about people going to jail implicating the president or about criminal investigations. it's beyond palace intrigue. >> i agree with you on those issues. i totally agree with you, that is serious and that is a concern. i'm referring to the chief of staff and how and when that position will get filled. and that view that as people getting too wrapped up in the day to day staffing positions. but all of those other issues, absolutely yes. those are serious. and we don't know what will happen with michael cohen, the

new revelations with him and the mueller probe is getting closer. and that is serious. but i'm just referring to their job inside the white house. they're looking at their individual job and responsibility, and they're not getting sidetracked. but, yes, the mueller probe is certainly becoming an issue, and it's something that not just the president but a lot of those inside the white house will be focusing on in the days and weeks to come. >> thank you very much, alice stewart, for joining us. the u.s. opens an investigation as a family mourns the girl who died in u.s. custody. we'll hear from her family when we come back.

♪ can you feel it there's endless fun with great toys and games for everyone at amazon, with low prices and free shipping on millions of items. for everything you need this holiday, visit amazon. ♪ now you can, with shipsticks.com! no more lugging your clubs through the airport or risk having your clubs lost or damaged by the airlines. sending your own clubs ahead with shipsticks.com makes it fast & easy to get to your golf destination. with just a few clicks or a phone call, we'll pick up and deliver your clubs on-time, guaranteed, for as low as $39.99. shipsticks.com saves you time and money. make it simple. make it ship sticks.

get stronger... get closer. start listening today to the world's largest selection of audiobooks on audible. and now, get more. for just $14.95 a month, you'll get a credit a month good for any audiobook, plus two audible originals exclusive titles you can't find anywhere else.

if you don't like a book, you can exchange it any time, no questions asked. automatically roll your credits over to the next month if you don't use them. with the free audible app, you can listen anytime, and anywhere. plus for the first time ever, you'll get access to exclusive fitness programs a $95 value free with membership. start a 30-day trial today and your first audiobook is free. cancel anytime and your books are yours to keep forever. audible. the most inspiring minds. the most compelling stories. text "listen9" to 500500 to start your free trial today.

australia's prime minister says his government now recognizes west jerusalem as the capital of israel. scott morrison says australia will moves its embassy from tel aviv when it's practical to do so. >> fundamentally it's the right of every country to determine its national capital. that is why the government are asked the question about the

position we have long adopted in relation to jerusalem. >> the u.s. department of homeland security is investigating the death of a 7-year-old guatemalan girl who died while in u.s. custody. she died two days after being detained by border patrol agents for crossing into the u.s. illegally with her father. family members back in her hometown of guatemala are in mourning. they say she and her father have to go to the u.s. to support them. >> translator: i would like my husband to stay and work in the u.s. because the resources are scarce for us to be able to pay the bills. it's not easy. >> translator: i'm not going to speak that much because i can barely take it. it's difficult for us. this happened because we are very much in need. the girl would jump in happiness she would get to go to united states, very happy and content. but she didn't know. for us it's difficult.

>> border patrol agents say they did everything they possibly could to try and save her life, but the 7-year-old girl's death is still under investigation. cnn's ed lavandera reports. federal officials say the 7-year-old would have likely died in the desert had border patrol agents not intervened with medical help. but despite that calls for an investigation into what happened in the hours she was in custody before her death are growing. the girl had just celebrated her 7th birthday three days earlier when she and her father made the difficult journey through treacherous terrain. >> this is just a very sad example of the dangers of this journey. >> reporter: according to dhs customs and border patrol agents apprehended her and her father november 6th along with a group of migrants turning themselves into the u.s. agents. it was there dhs says her father

first told the agents her daughter was not in good health. he does not speak english. the father and daughter waited for hours before boarding the bus to a nearby border station. dhs says on the way to new mexico 95 miles away the girl ran a high fever and started vomiting. at one point she stopped breathing. agents revived her and called ahead for emergency medical help. just over an hour after reaching the border station she was airlifted to providence children's hospital in el paso, texas, 160 miles away. her father traveled there separately. the girl suffered cardiac arrest in the hospital, was revived but did not recover. she died on the morning of december 8th. the coroner has not ruled on her cause of death. >> this family chose to cross illegally. what happened here they were about 90 miles away from where we could process them. we gave immediate care. we'll continue to look into the

situation, but again i cannot stress how dangerous this journey is when migrants choose to come here illegally. >> does the administration take responsibility for a parent taking a child on a trek through mexico to get to this country? no. >> reporter: not far the group network for border rights takes issue with the trump administration blaming the girl's father. >> this is not the america mat we used to believe, the militarization of the border, this situation is going to come and haupt trm the rest of our society. this is not what america is about. >> reporter: they will launch an internal investigation and the findings of that report will be made public. but critics are also wondering why it took dhs a week to talk about the death of this young girl and why it took a news report to bring this story to light. cnn, el paso, texas. millions of americans may

find themselves without health care if a judge's ruling is up held. could it be a last stand for obamacare? stay with us. say hello to the braava jet mopping robot from irobot. its precision jet spray and vibrating cleaning head loosen and scrub stains. all while navigating kitchens, bathrooms and those hard to reach places. you and braava jet from irobot. better together.

...and i found out that i'ma from the big toe lian. of that sexy italian boot!

so this holiday season it's ancestrydna per tutti! order your kit now at ancestry.com ♪ there's no place likargh!e ♪ i'm trying... ♪ yippiekiyay.

♪ mom. ♪ watching "cnn newsroom." let's look at her headlines this hour. legislation that brought health care to millions of americans has been struck down by a u.s. judge. he ruled the affordable care act better known as obamacare unconstitutional. legal experts say the ruling won't immediately affect american's health coverage. an appeal is expected. u.s. president donald trump has chosen mick mulvaney to be

his chief of staff. he will keep that job as well. the current chief of staff john kelly is leaving at the end of the year. russia is criticizing the u.s. for putting a decades old nuclear missile treaty in jeopardy after the u.s. threatened to withdraw. in support of the intermediate range nuclear forces treaty the u.s. says it will leave unless russia complies with the deal. moskow denies any violations of the treaty. and britain's labor party is calling for a brexit vote before christmas after prime minister theresa may failed to gain concessions from the eu in brussels. downing says a vote could take place in january, but the eu is skeptical a vote could be approved and are moving forward with plans for a hard brexit. i want to take a closer look at our top story this hour. a u.s. judge has struck down the affordable care act. it was barack obama's signature piece of legislation. it brought health care to

millions. it also brought the wrath of conservatives who have been trying for years to dismantle it. let's bring in peter matthews, political professor at cyprus college. do you think a judge in texas could be the end who ends up fulfilling at least the first part of that promise, repeal? >> well, the repeal, yes. but there'll be a supreme court hearing later on and that'll be the final decision. there's two different philosophies here. one is health care a human right that should be guaranteed for all as one side believes, or the other side believes it's a privilege you have to earn individually. it's a whole different clash on the foundation of the issues. >> you're telling me about the politics of it, but it could end up decided as a legal matter. it already has been by the supreme court. and the legal argument in court to your point is actually

totally different from the politics of it and how you look at health care and whether it should be free market based or a right for everyone. so it could end up being just a legal issue. >> that's right. because it has to deal with the individual mandate and turned on the tax cuts of 2017 that trump brought in and those tax cuts eliminated the penalty for not having health insurance. and the court decided that because of that individual mandate is no longer valid and therefore congress can no longer stand on it because that was a tax. and twice before that this was upheld saying that the individual mandate is valid because it's a tax. it was actually a technical issue, you're right about that. >> but now the tax, it's disappeared. it's been taken down to zero in the new tax law, and that was the basis for the legal argument of the texas judge saying if

it's zero its it's not a tax and therefore it becomes illegal. that's his argument. i want to read for you the president's tweet. as i predicted all along obamacare as been struck down as an unconstitutional disaster. now congress must pass a strong law that provides great health care and protects pre-existing conditions. mitch and nancy, get it done. so here's my question. is this -- is this a boom for the president? is this what he's wanted all along or is it actually going to get him stuck in a rut because the law could fall, and if he doesn't have a replacement then he's going to own that? >> the latter. the president is going to be in big trouble if the entire law does continue to be struck done because millions will have to give up their health care, and it'll create a disaster. he may just have the whole baby thrown out with the bathwater.

that's a real problem for him. >> okay. but the counter argument is perhaps, perhaps this congress counter intuitively may be a better congress to work with than the previous one because the democrats may want to keep some form of health care they like and the senators in -- the republican senators are more moderate an the republican congressman were before, so maybe they can agree with a democratic win. >> it's very possible to come up with a compromise and for sure the house is much more progressive on this because they have 40 new members and it could happen. and in that case they could get the republican senate maybe to compromise. >> by the way, potentially if that happens that would be a huge political success, wouldn't it? >> it would be a success, certainly. but the thing is can they get it done? there's a momentum now for a single payer universal health care system, a public insurance company that i think a lot of democrats are pushing in the house. let's see if that can come into

fruition. it may take a couple of years, though. >> and i see another danger on the horizon politically, which is and we saw it already manifest itself in the mid-terms. democrats already used this issue and they used it to good effect. they won lots of seats in the house campaigning on health care. they could do that in 2020. >> that's right, especially when the pre-existing part gets taken up. millions will feel it. and then it'll be a big issue that hurt the republicans over all. 75% of americans support guaranteeing pre-existing conditions coverage. and that's a lot of people. so this a losing side that the trump administration is on and so are the republicans in the senate, on the wrong side and in the house as well, on this one. >> well, and donald trump appears to be one of those 75% because he wants congress also to defend and guarantee pre-existing conditions. i'm just reading his tweet here.

that's what he wants. that's his political objective. he's asking congress to get it done. we'll see if it happens. peter matthews, thank you for joining us. >> let's see. thank you so much. donald trump changing his story about an alleged hush money scheme again. this after his former attorney accused him of lying about the payments. we'll have a look at the president's evolving explanations when we come back. ♪ can you feel it ♪ can you feel it ♪ can you feel it put a smile on everyone's face this holiday, with great gifts from amazon.

with low prices and free shipping on millions of items, for everything you need this holiday, visit amazon. now you can, with shipsticks.com! no more lugging your clubs through the airport or risk having your clubs lost or damaged by the airlines. sending your own clubs ahead with shipsticks.com makes it fast & easy to get to your golf destination. with just a few clicks or a phone call, we'll pick up and deliver your clubs on-time, guaranteed, for as low as $39.99. shipsticks.com saves you time and money. make it simple. make it ship sticks.

donald trump is facing new scrutiny over his involvement in hush money payments to two women who allege affairs with him. after his former lawyer accused mr. trump of ordering the payments the president and his legal team are trying to change their story once again. brian todd breaks things down for us. >> reporter: president trump's hush money payments to stormy daniels and karen mcdougal, they once have seemed embarrassing personally but now they threaten

to harm him legally. experts say that may be why the president's story keeps changing, going from i didn't know, to its not my fault to it's not illegal. in a new administer view with abc michael cohen says trump directed him to make the payments to them and doing it with a specific purpose in mind, winning the presidency. >> to help his campaign. >> to help him and the campaign. >> reporter: that experts say would be a violation of campaign finance law, which may be why the president is now blaming his lawyer for bad advice. tweeting thursday morning i never directed michael cohen to break the law. he is a lawyer and he's supposed to know the law. just hours after tweeting that trump told fox news cohen barely did legal work for him. >> that was his title. >> very low level work. he did more public relations than he did law. >> reporter: but back in april the president had a different

view of cohen on air force one when he denied ever knowing about the stormy daniels payment. >> mr. president, did you know about the $130,000 payment to stormy daniels? >> no. >> why did michael cohen make this, if there was no truth to her allegations? >> you'll have to ask michael. mike's my attorney and you'll have to ask michael. >> reporter: his story changed again. >> later on i knew, later on. but you have to understand what he did, and they weren't taken outs of campaign finance. >> reporter: experts say that argument may not hold water especially because the president according to a source was at a meeting in august of 2015 discussing hush money payments with cohen and david pecker, the ceo of the national enquirer's parent company. does it give him an out to say that i knew about it later? >> no, it doesn't give him an out if he knew about it later.

once he knew about it, he was party to the violation. >> reporter: another shift in the story comes from trump's legal advisor rudy giuliani. on may 2nd giuliani told fox that cohen who had taken out a home personal equity line was paid back by trump. >> has the president reimbursed that. >> that the an admission trump knew about the payments earlier? >> yes, that's an admission he knew about it earlier. why would trump reimburse him if he never knew about the payments? >> reporter: he said it meant trump hadn't violated campaign finance laws. >> that money is not campaign money. sorry, i'm give yugoslavia a fact you don't know. it's not campaign money. no campaign finance violation. so they funneled it through a law firm and the president repaid it. >> reporter: experts say the repayment of cohen which prosecutors now say came in the form of fake retainer payments to him in the trump organization

still means there probably were campaign finance violations and may have violated other laws, too. that may be why trump suggested another version of the story on thursday when he denied paying back media conglomerate ami, for its roll in hush money payments to mcdougal. >> i don't think they even paid any money to their tab blad. >> by not paying back you have a straight out corporate contribution to the campaign. >> reporter: all of it begs the question are all these shifting stories taken as a whole a crime? >> the idea he's committed crimes, whether it is the willful violation because he's trying to hide it, showing he knows there's something wrong here, and there also can be an element of objukz of justice. that he's trying to influence other witnesses, that he's trying to influence the jury with lies. >> reporter: but experts caution there's also the possibility of all these shifting stories in totality may not prove

obstruction of justice simply because we don't know everything that trump and his legal team may have told prosecutors. and they say trump and his team could make the case the president was confused about the law, confused about what obstruction really means, even though he's always had lawyers to tell him that. >> political analyst and former federal prosecutor renato mariotti joins me now. let's start with this idea that trump could plead ignorance. in other words, he didn't know the law so he can't have broken it. >> generally speaking ignorance of the law is not a defense. but in some very rare circumstances, for example, when someone is being charged with an offense related to the tax code or the campaign finance laws, in order to criminally punish the person they had to have known they were breaking the law. so for example if you just in

your taxes, if you maybe claimed a deduction you weren't supposed to, as long as you didn't know you were doing something unlawful, you might get audited, you might have to pay some money but you won't go to prezzen. that's the idea here. but there's some pretty good evidence that would point to the fact the president didn't know this was unlawful. i suspect prosecutors would be pointing to that evidence as they continue to make their case. >> yeah, and he was surrounded by lawyers. this happened during the campaign in the final closing stretch of the presidential campaign. he was surrounded by lawyers. i would assume that would factor in. what is donald trump's best defense in this particular matter, i mean the matter of the actual payments to stormy daniels and karen mcdougal? >> i think the best defense is going to be the one we just spoke about. he's going to say that because michael cohen was a lawyer and he was involved that he assumed it must have been legal because there's no way a lawyer would

have gotten involved in something if it was illegal. the problem for him is that cohen wasn't really acting as a lawyer in this situation. it's not like trump went to cohen for legal advice. you know, he was a fixer, he was dealing with the situation. i think it would be hard for trump to claim as he did i think on twitter the other day that this is an advice of counsel defense. that's one for example my clients come to me and they say what's your advice on something and they follow my advice and they get in trouble. this isn't a situation like that. here is the fixer, you know, creating shell companies and funneling payments and creating false statements in the books and records of the president's company. it's just very hard to see this as rendering legal advice. >> something else. our sources tell us that special counsel robert mueller would still like to interview the president. and it's about donald trump's state of mind when he did certain things that are being

investigated as possible obstruction of justice. why does state of mind matter in that regard? >> so in that context if you're trying to prove obstruction of justice, a prosecutor has to prove that the person acted with what's called a corrupt intent. so very specific sort of intent. and the idea is that, you know, for example, it's lawful for the president to fire the fbi director if the president thinks he's doing a bad job. you can always fire somebody for poor performance. but if you fire somebody with a purpose of undermining a lawful investigation, then that is a corrupt intent. and that's really what -- >> couldn't donald trump say that was not my intention, i wasn't doing this in order to obstruct justice or impede the russia investigation. i was doing this because i thought that james comey was a bad fbi director? >> no question he could say that. and then what robert mueller would do is follow up with

additional questions. well, what about when you told lester holt something different? what about this e-mail, what about this tweet? what about your anger at attorney general sessions for recusing himself? you know, all of these times when the president has said things that sure looked like he wants to shutdown or undermine or cut short the investigation. >> one more thing, michael cohen has been sentenced, michael flynn is about to be sentenced. where does that tell us where robert mueller is in his investigation? does that mean he's wrapping things up? >> i say he's finishing certain pieces of the investigation. but there's a huged blacked out portion, there's at least one case left to go there. and the michael cohen sentencing memorandum, the special counsel's office was very cagey about what more cohen could do, what his cooperation could yield. and similarly when they were in

open court in new york the prosecutor who worked for bob mueller was very, very vague about exactly what cohen had done. so suggested to me that there's still some bombshells left to fall here. >> and that's a good point with the redactions. there appear to be some entire areas of legal interest we're just not privy too. so worth keeping in mind. thank you for joining us. >> thank you. and france is bracing for another weekend of protests that could rock paris and other parts of the country. when we return why some protesters say the concessions made this week by president macron are still not enough. these folks, they don't have time to go to the post office they have businesses to grow customers to care for lives to get home to

they use stamps.com print discounted postage for any letter any package any time right from your computer all the amazing services of the post office only cheaper get our special tv offer a 4-week trial plus postage and a digital scale go to stamps.com/tv and never go to the post office again!

says it's facilitating talks between the u.s. and afghan taliban on monday. said the u.s. made the request. a spokesperson for the u.s. embassy in islamabad says pakistan is fundamental to the afghan peace process. to france now. france is bracing for a fifth weekend of yellow vest protests throughout the country. calling for a return to calm and order. ee also made concessions earlier

this week by canceling the fuel tax which sparked the fuel tax in the first place and promising to raise the minimum wage. but many say it is not enough and they plan to keep on demonstrating. our ben wedemen reports. >> reporter: the honking is not annoyance, just a show of support for the yellow vest protesters at the roundabiliout rural normandy northwest of paris. because my pension is melting in the sun, he tells me, there's nothing left. and what does he want for president emmanuel macron. this is the other side of the protest at hundreds of round

abilities acro abouts across the country there's people every day making their message clear and there's none of the drama and tension of saturday's in paris. the atmosphere is upbeat. they've put up a sign-on their shelter after the official residence of the french president. and draped yellow vests over a fence which surrounds a castle built by richard the lion hearted built 820 years ago that looms over the roundabout. luncheon this day is barbecued sausages and baguette. this 33-year-old lost her part time job caring for handicapped children last august and spoke to us just before she headed out to join the protests.

she's been a regular since they began a month ago. i think the politicians are truly disconnected to their people of limited means and rural areas, she says. we're really forgotten. with them she's found solidarity, support and friendship. it really brings us together, she says. the protests were sparked by anger over proposed increases to fuel taxes, now scrapped. but they've taken on a life of their own. did president macron's monday speech make a difference? he says crap, she says. he said things that don't interest us at all. we want him to reduce taxes, raise the minimum wage and pensions. so they'll brave the cold and carry on. ben wedemen, cnn, france. and we'll go live to paris next hour as those protests will

be getting under way. you're watching live pictures of central paris, the champs-elysees. if you've visited the french capital you have been there. we'll take a look next hour. stay with us. we've got more news at the top of the hour. you ok there, kurt? we're about to move. karate helps... relieve some of the house-buying... stress. at least you don't have to worry about homeowners insurance. call geico. geico... helps with... homeowners insurance? been doing it for years. i'm calling geico right now. good idea! get to know geico. and see how easy homeowners and renters insurance can be.

♪ the whole world's coming ♪ iftogether now ♪nd ♪ can you feel it ♪ can you feel it ♪ can you feel it ♪ can you feel it box: woah! ♪ can you feel it woman: delivery ♪ can you feel it

woman: alexa, turn on the lights. ♪ can you feel it ♪ can you feel it now you can, with shipsticks.com! no more lugging your clubs through the airport or risk having your clubs lost or damaged by the airlines. sending your own clubs ahead with shipsticks.com makes it fast & easy to get to your golf destination. with just a few clicks or a phone call, we'll pick up and deliver your clubs on-time, guaranteed, for as low as $39.99. shipsticks.com saves you time and money. make it simple. make it ship sticks.

a u.s. federal judge rules the affordable care act known as obamacare is unconstitutional. the blow to democrats and a cause for celebration for the u.s. president. plus donald trump makes a surprise announcement and names an acting chief of staff just days after saying he didn't want an acting chief of staff but a permanent one. and protesters expected to take to the streets in france for a fifth weekend. this comes just days after the french president announced concessions to try and end the demonstrations. we are live from the cnn center here in atlanta. i'm cyril vanier. it's great to have you with us. >>