that's megan mullally had a tweet of her own in response. if you guys need me, i'll be in a whole in the ground. a reminder, please don't miss anderson's show, full circle, a daily interactive broadcast on facebook, always great to watch. hand it over to chris cuomo, cuomo prime time. welcome to prime time, we're having a day that this president will not want to remember. and it is one that we can never forget. the man charged with keeping our country safe, defense secretary jim mattis is out. not retiring as the president claims. he quit in protest of the president of the united states. a four-star general is here to help make sense of the moves. mattis exit comes on a day of epic uncertainty. insisting on the wall in a house vote when many in the senate have already left.

border politics. did you see louie gutierrez storm out of the house hearing. he's here. and so is the one republican trump supporter in congress that i could get to come on. has matt gates gotten a wakeup call about this presidency? the time is now, my friends, let's get after it. no less than bob corker once said, there were three men separating our country from che ogs. rex tillerson, john kelly and james mattis. all three gone or going. just think about the last 36 hours. early yesterday morning in a surprise to his own state department and the pentagon, the president decided alone to pull our troops out of syria, falsely declaring the war against isis there won. the only person happy about the decision, vladimir putin. republicans raked their president over the coals.

>> i think we're going to pay a price for it if it's not reversed. >> it's hard to imagine any president would wake up and make this kind of decision with this little communication. with this little preparation. >> to say they're defeated is an overstatement and is fake news. >> that was just the beginning. >> later yesterday morning, the president seemed to choose workers over that imaginary wall and backed out of the shutdown. but then he reversed course today. really catching senators in the lurch. and in this moment of crisis, who makes the case to the country about ending two major military actions? a shutdown looming over christmas and a border crisis? this guy. right now as we speak, there is a surge of illegal immigration heading authored our country that presents a national crisis now. not a month from now, not a year from now, right now. >> on a day like this you send out the man who is the metaphor for what people question about your judgment?

thank god the markets were closed by then. by 4:00 p.m. eastern, another 464 points knocked off the dow. the nasdaq below its lowest point in august. then came 5:21 p.m. eastern, the gut punch, the real wall, the man who stood between the president and his petulence went to the white house and said to the president, you have to listen to me, you can't do that. in that moment, he decided. this is as good as it gets. he left, he put out a scathing letter a total rebuke of the president's world view saying, my views on treating allies with respect and also being clear eyed about maligned actors. informed by over four decades of emersion in these issues, because you have the right to have a secretary of defense whose views are better aligned

with these and better subjects, i believe it is right for me to step down from my position. cnn learned late this evening once again this president will double down on a controversial decision. the military has been ordered to withdraw half the troops in afghanistan. if your head's not spinning, you're not listening. i want to bring in wesley clark and phil mud. we need to steady the ship, give me a sense of the proportion of what's going on in our government right now? >> i think the -- this is a really dangerous time for the u.s. government, it's christmas holidays. you have a lot of snap decisions being made by a president who is famous for snap decisions. these are consequential decisions. he's under tremendous pressure, obviously from the mueller investigation. the rumor is coming out of the middle east are astonishing, when you listen to them, that he's looking for a way out. that he's taken huge bribes from

foreign countries and mueller has some or all of this in the works, his children are in danger. so i mean, trump's head is spinning, you have to look at these decisions as not only dangerous in themselves, but probably part of his bargaining strategy for how he wants to exit the u.s. government and try to avoid impeachment or criminal indictment for himself and his family. this is a really dangerous time. >> keeping it to the specifics of the impact of the military moves, the idea of the war being over with isis. what's the risk and the reality 1234. >> well, the war is not over with isis, and you handed the field to russia and the iranians which is odd considering president trump has been so hard on the iranians, that's clearly a bad move. in afghanistan, we've been -- we've never put the resources in there from the beginning to try

to really work that mission. i don't know who's coming out, we'd have to look at what the structure is, can you do? how much can you do with half the troops gone? you can still do something. i always felt that biden's plan was a workable idea back in 2009, we went the other way with trying to reinforce it, but we never put enough troops in to do a good job. the afghanistan is a question mark. i do think that secretary mattis did the right thing for himself and for the country. he's been disempowered by having been ignored, his advice ignored by the president. he can't be effective in that role, he can't be effective with allies, he can't be effective with the white house. and so it's the -- he's doing the smart thing and the right thing. i know it's upsetting for the country. the country has to face the consequences of the election of 2016 and deal with the reality

of the man that's in the white house. >> so let me bring phil in here, let me read another excerpt of the letter and get your take, this may be frightening in the moment, somehow might be cleansing overall. one core belief i've always held, our nation is linked to the strength of our comprehensive system of alliances and partnerships. the u.s. remains the leader in the free world, we cannot maintain that without maintain ing strong relationships with allies. >> this is not too thinly veiled if you're in the business i'm in. this is a message to the president that says, i'm out and you're dead wrong. look at the three basic pieces of that letter. you just mentioned on alliances, world war i, world war ii ancient history. how about afghanistan, iraq, how we counter with nato, russian

activities in places like eastern ukraine and crimea. the president went out of his way publicly to embarrass nato. so i think if you look at nato and the alliances as historical, they're not. we use them in places like, after 9/11 and afghanistan, we might use them in the future against russia. two quick comments in addition to that. the former secretary of defense or soon to be former secretary of defense also said, forget about our allies, what about our adversaries, i disagree with you on how you deal with potential adversaries, including china and russia. find me the sentence in that letter where the former four-star general tells his command in chief, i appreciate the opportunity to serve you personally, the president of the united states. he doesn't say it. that letter is tough. >> the democrats want to get out of syria, they want to get out of afghanistan. one of the big surprises of barack obama's election was that he ran on getting out of iraq, and went into afghanistan.

how do you think this plays with them or how should it? >> should we get out of these places eventually. we've been at war in afghanistan for 18 years, yes. let's talk about style for a moment. transgender policy in the pentagon, exercises with the north koreans, retreating from syria and afghanistan. can you explain to me what the process was to coordinate with the secretary of defense and the national security council about how to talk to people like the turks, the jordanians, our kurdish allies in the syrian fight? i can't speak for the secretary of defense. part of the question is not just what we're doing, but how do we do policy by tweet? how do we coordinate this. that's what i would ask. >> general mattis reportedly was not in favor of that big meet and greet with kim jong-un, this is not the way we get these guys to do anything. and sure enough, today they said, we're not giving up

anything until everything is gone. kelly is gone, mcmaster is gone, and now mattis is gone. now what? >> we're in a new world here, but mattis is not gone for another six or eight weeks, the congress has its say. and we've got to come to terms with the character of the president and how he makes decisions. and congress has to assert itself. the democratic leadership in the house will assert itself, will the republican leadership in the senate assert itself? >> that's the big question, general. >> this is the time we need help. >> they have been sitting back and watching. even on the house side, you had paul ryan, people with great ambitions for him. i always remained myself, and that's my tip to everybody else. no, he didn't. he sat back and watched this president do things he used to call out in president obama. he's not alone. do you think this is a tipping

point? do you believe that republican men and women of good will who raise their hand and took an oath are going to step up? >> i think it's the start of the tipping point. i mean, it's really two things, it's the behavior of the president, and the information that's continuing to leak out through court indictments and hearings and other things like this. president trump is being slammed from both directions here. and he's fighting back, and this is his nature. this is the time that -- especially the united states senate has to step up its responsibilities. >> well, with all due respect to you both. if he were a real fighter, he would be where you are right now, addressing the american people, he would be going through the media and saying, hold on, everything's fine. let me tell you why i did what i did. and how it fits in and what it means. i am your president, i will reassure you. he did the opposite. he put out that guy who's a part of a real extreme part of trumpism. he showed why today, instead of

doing it himself, he put out a proxy who is not his best foot forward. the question becomes, the stock markets, border politics coming over, you may have a shut down over christmas, now you have these military moves. do you believe this is bottom for this presidency, phil? >> i do not. when i'm looking at the congressional response today, including issues for funding on the border wall. you see this evening, how many people are out especially from house republicans saying, i disagree with the president giving us a bunch of moving around on the issue of how we're going to fund the government. i see very little response over the past two years from congressional republicans on everything from the president lying to us on air force one about how he fund ed a pole dancer for $130,000. clearly he lied, to whether we were safe in north korea. i don't care about what he did, in terms of his payment to somebody he had a relationship

with. i care about moving forward our congressional republicans, his judgment is appropriate when we deal with issues like north korea and iran. the answer is, they're not going to do it. despite his best efforts, the government and its institutions are bigger than any one branch. it is interesting to she whether or not this will be the moment you heard men and women on both sides say quiet, no more. general, thank you so much. phil mudd, appreciate your perspective. we have much more on what this mattis exit and the troop exit from two major theaters means for our collective safety. and also the border war is raging, and there is no solution in sight. the lawmaker who called the dh secretary a liar to her face is here to tell you why. share the love event,

we've shown just how far love can go. (grandma vo) over one hundred national parks protected. (mom vo) more than fifty thousand animals rescued. (old man vo) nearly two million meals delivered. (mom vo) over eighteen hundred wishes granted. (vo) that's one hundred and forty million dollars donated to charity by subaru and its retailers over eleven years. (girl) thank you. (boy) thank you. (old man) thank you. (granddaughter) thank you.

i need a cookbook for my best friend. beginner or advanced? advanced. sweet or savory? both. apple strudle or spicy jammy? strudle! how's this? perfect. how'd you do that? it's what i do. nobody knows foodies like we do... barnes & noble. life isn't a straight line. things happen. and sometimes you can find yourself heading in a new direction. but at fidelity, we help you prepare for the unexpected

with retirement planning and advice for what you need today and tomorrow. because when you're with fidelity, a partner who makes sure every step is clear, there's nothing to stop you from moving forward. ♪five golden... ♪six golden rings... ♪seven golden rings! little things can be a big deal. that's why there's otezla. otezla is not a cream. it's a pill that treats moderate to severe plaque psoriasis differently. with otezla,75% clearer skin is achievable. don't use if you're allergic to otezla. it may cause severe diarrhea, nausea, or vomiting. otezla is associated with an increased risk of depression. tell your doctor if you have a history of depression or suicidal thoughts, or if these feelings develop.

some people taking otezla reported weight loss. your doctor should monitor your weight and may stop treatment. upper respiratory tract infection and headache may occur. tell your doctor about your medicines and if you're pregnant or planning to be. otezla. show more of you. ito take care of anyct messy situations.. and put irritation in its place. and if i can get comfortable keeping this tookus safe and protected... you can get comfortable doing the same with yours. preparation h. get comfortable with it. while the trump administration is on the brink of shutting down the government, the politics of the border are boiling over, the death of a 7-year-old girl a flash point. you remember her, from guatemala, she died this month while in u.s. custody. homeland security secretary kirstejn nielsen explained it this way. >> this is a sad example of the

dangers of this journey. this family chose to cross illegally. it took our border control folks a couple times to get them all. >> pointing the finger of blame at the family. today she felt the heat. >> shame on everybody that separates children and allows them to stay at the other side of the border fearing death, fearing hunger, fearing sickness. shame on us for wearing our badge of christianity during christmas and allow the secretary to come here and lie. >> you're calling me a liar. i'm not a liar. >> any family i encountered in the interior i would separate. any family i found at a port of entry i would separate. every single family i found illegally crossing we would separate. we did none of those. what we did do is uphold the laws that congress has passed and prosecuted those who choose to come here illegally. >> that's not a time lapse.

that was congressman gutierrez walking out on nilsson. >> let's deal with the urgency and we'll get into the context of the overall plan. >> sure. >> forget what i said, i'm not going to have a cr if there's no wall attached to it, the house gives him the vote. the senate side, a lot of them are gone, so where do things stand? is there going to be a shutdown or not? >> i believe there is going to be a government shutdown. it's unfortunate and totally unnecessary. the senate made a proposal and let's remember the senate is controlled by republicans. we were ready to work, democrats were ready to bite the bullet today, we may not have been happy with the total context of the bill coming over, but we were ready to keep the government open, i think it's kind of sad, chris, that you have members of the republican party in the house saying, well, you know, those government employees, it comes with the territory, when they take a government job that they should expect to be on furlough from

time to time, when the government closes. yeah, well, mr. congressman, lady congressman, you get your chuc check, you're going to have a wonderful christmas. and you're going to have your health care. the callousness with which we treat our fellow americans, is really repugnant. >> what's the brass tax here. what would you have to give to get it done? >> we already said they could have a couple billion dollars in border enforcement. smart border enforcement. border enforcement that's going to help keep america safe. everybody knows you can't use the technology from the chinese in order to get a solution today. so look. it's old technology, let's use modern technology, smart technology. we are putting on the table $2 billion for border security so that we can continue to protect -- >> what do they want? >> they want a wall, and i just want to say this, chris, we've

been on the program before talking, do you remember the hostage taking of the dreamers and the democrats response was $5 billion? >> right. >> and then they increased and so we said, how do -- what do we do with the kidnappers of our dreamers? what is the ransom, bernie sanders, elizabeth warren, dick durbin went and offered this president $25 billion? what did he say? no. because it isn't about the wall, it's about destroying our immigration system. it's about destroying and stopping this being a nation -- a welcoming nation. they want to destroy immigration as we know it, the foundation of america, that's what they want to destroy. until they destroy it, they will not be happy, the wall is simply one element. one symptom. >> what got you going today was the secretary proposed a plan where you can come here and apply for asylum, but you will stay in mexico pending the review of the application. the policy judgment being there if they get inside this country,

there's going to be an attrition rate, catch and release is what it's called, you're not going to be able to find these people again. why don't you like that solution? >> we have asylum laws, refugee laws, those are the laws of our nation, those are the laws well established and i think that this new criteria being proposed of saying to people fleeing violence, death, gangs, murder, god, why should they have to wait on the other side of the border, when they can be victimized once again when they are 1,000 -- you know what we're going to have there, you're going to have illness, more murder, more rape, more harm coming to people that are fleeing. so i guess today, chris, you know, look, i'm a catholic, so i went to my first communion, my confirmation. maybe they didn't religiously teach us the bible all the time, but you know, there was

something fundamental, it's christian, don't call it that, don't say happy holidays, say merry christmas, they want to emphasize their christianity. >> you have reason -- >> you know what, it's christmas. >> i get the idea of what the spirit of the season is, but compassion can also have an integrity to it, and the laws have enabled something we've never seen before. these mascara vans are being organized by some good people, some bad people. go with your kids you will get in. go in big groups you can get in. the system cannot handle the flow. the rules have to change to enable people to treat others humanely. they can't do it right now. that's what that little girl's death tells you. the system did, they can't handle the flow. you have to do something, louie. >> here's -- chris, understand something, what does the richest, most powerful nation in the world do with the resources and the abundance that we have?

what do we do? we say only 100 people can come at each point of entry. you're really telling me that's the capacity of the united states of america? that that's our humanity. >> you'll have backlog for years? >> i disagree with you respectfully, there are people there and it is part of a process that has been engineered to make the crossing of the -- okay, chris, when are we going to deal with the fact that the de bill taking of honduras, el salvador, guatemala is directly linked with the consumption of illegal drugs in the united states? we here in the united states through our consumption of those debilitate those economies. shouldn't we be working on both sides of the border to establish countries in which -- >> yes. >> everyone thinks you dial 911, chicago it may take 20 minutes.

>> you should be taking on all of this stuff. >> that is the kind of comprehensive plan we need to engage in. we need to open up offices in each one of our embassies, if you fear and have an asylum case you'd like to bring, bring it to us and prepare it. >> bring it in. >> good, change the rule. >> we can put the kinds of outposts. we can say to the government of mexico, listen, we're going to help you, because this is the united states of america, and we're going to put a place where people can be treated humanely. i'm sorry, chris, but they keep telling us, oh, stop saying happy holidays, it's merry christmas. during the christmas season what would have been a baby jesus if we built a wall and he couldn't flee bethlehem. >> the moral imperative is action. you can have the spirit of christmas in your heart, you guys are of have to do more than fight about it. >> that's what you're saying,

fight about it. you know this better than most, the speaker of the house was a chief proceed poen end of comprehensive re230r78. he came to chicago with me, stood with me at the city club to say we need a comprehensive. he signed on the bill i introduced in 2004, and then he becomes speaker of the house, i promise you i will never bring up a solution to our immigration issue. that is what they are doing. and then we have a president -- >> you got the ball now. >> we do, you know something, and we're going to use it. and we are going to use it constructively. it's sad we have lost the john mccains. it's really sad, and you know what, i still remember working with president bush the son. i remember working with him and bringing down his secretary. that does not exist any more. >> it's got to. >> that's what i hope today means to you guys. >> ronald reagan in 1984 was the

pro immigrant force. what's happened to this republican party? they have used immigrants as a scapegoat and a tool for their own political gains. that's unfortunate. >> we're going to stay on it, we wish you the best for christmas, i hope everyone remembers the reason for the season. >> thank you. >> thank you. now, i keep asking, is this bottom for the president? everybody tells me no, by the way. general wesley clark said, wait until russia enters ukraine, if that happens, then you have a big shoe to drop. we know where we are. where do we go from here. how do we get the cooperation that louie was just talking about? that's the start for the great debate next. ♪ it's the time of the season for loving ♪

for a limited time, $50 for them $10 for you. applebee's. now that's eatin' good in the neighborhood. the scenery never changes. that's why this is the view for every other full-size pickup. and this year, it's déjà vu all over again. 'cuz only the ford f-150 gives you best-in-class torque, best-in-class payload . . . and you got it, baby . . . best-in-class towing. this is the big dog! this is the ford f-150. it doesn't just raise the bar, pal. it is the bar. and now, you can get a ford f-150 with zero percent financing for 72 months. only at your ford dealer.

financing for 72 months. ♪ there's no place likargh!e ♪ i'm trying... ♪

yippiekiyay. ♪ mom. ♪ new information on this day of disruption. it's time for our leaders to stand and be counted. one more just has. mitch mcconnell says this. i believe it is essential that the united states maintain and strengthen the post world war ii alliances that have been carefully built by leaders in both parties. we must maintain a clear eyed understanding of our friends and foes. i was sorry to learn that secretary mattis will soon

depart the administration. i am particularly distressed he will leave his post. you have to pick someone else, and hopefully when you do, the guy's like mattis. there is secretary majority leader mcconnell weighing in. he's been at the head of the stand by parade when it comes to watching what president trump does. let's debate where we are, and where we're going to go. thanks to both. mike, is this a low moment for you guys on the right? seeing the fruits of disruption? the hope was, trump being disruptive would shake up the system and bring about something better. what's going on with this potential shutdown over christmas, withdrawing the troops this way, you can't be happy. >> you know, i think what you're seeing is, people that have

followed the president will tell you that there's a lot of things he issues that are not top of the list for him. health care, taxes are not the things he's talked about for years. when he ran on what he believes, what he and steve bannon worked together on. was changing our trade policy, changing our immigration policy and changing our policy overseas. they knew they wouldn't be able to do it without massive disruption. i think what you're seeing is the president finally getting to the point where he's like, i'm going to carry out the policies that i ran on. and i don't really care how much chaos you think there is, that's what's going to happen when you're changing things. that's not necessarily even republican or democrat thing. there's republicans that are more for involvement in the middle east. barack obama ran on bring all the troops home everyone end all of our wars. is that is a populous nationalist presidency that is

finally doing the things he always said he was going to do. we're seeing the consequences of what he's keeping his promises on. >> so it's all going according to plan, begala? >> i wish, i would sleep so much better. i don't believe the president had a strategy at all. this is a guy that runs on impulse and grievance and whatever he saw this morning on fox and friends. the government is about to shut down because the president, who a day or two said he was okay with continuing the current funding until february 8th, now all of a sudden has flip-flopped on that, it's the chaos that causes these crisis. it's not that he has a strategy, i wish he did. he has impulses and grievances. and he's acting on them. the notion that he has these grievances against general mattis, is particularly upsetting. i was happy to see senator

mcconnell stand up on his hind legs, as if he didn't run a co equal branch of the government. maybe this is a bit of a turning point. you have -- there's the mueller investigation looming. you have the government about to shut down. you have the stock market really dropping dismally in the last five sessions. the government's going to shut down now, maybe -- maybe you'll see republicans on the hill begin a check and a balance on this unchecked and unbalanced president. >> we've never seen a resignation like this this way. >> i share the concerns, i'm an air force brat, i have a tremendous amount of respect for general mattis. i think he served the president well. if the president brings in someone like mattis, it will calm everybody down and make them not as worried about it. i do believe there's a difference in policy here, and the policy difference is, that general mattis and people like marco rubio and mitch mcconnell and lots of republicans are more in favor of our alliances over

seas, there's a populous sort of movement in the country that president trump represents that says we should disentangle ourselves on those alliances, and spend that money at home. there's plenty of democrats that agree with that. >> i don't like that mattis and mcconnell both took time to mention russia in their letters and they don't think the president gets it, about russia. that's always been the central question, paul, and now to hear someone like mcconnell bring it up, today had nothing to do with russia, other than putin liking us getting out of syria, and that being a strategic advantage for him. they both went out of their way to mention the president's obvious point of disagreement with them on russia? >> russia is a threat. back, way back, i owe this to our audience, in 2012. m.i.t. romney said russia was our greatest threat. i jumped on his back as well, i was wrong. mitt was right. i hope he continues his focus on russia, what you're seeing today

is swlad mere poeten gloating. his economy is a tenth of ours. his military is a tenth the size of ours. >> a lot of it is lined up on the border of ukraine right now. >> i look and i see that israel is angry and russia is happy. i start to think -- i'd much rather be alied with israel than russia. they're a democracy, they share our values. russia is none of those things, and yet -- that suggests to me that this very impulsive policy is bad. >> let's not get too carried away, that's why it's really important to see who comes in to lead the defense department, the policies of this administration have been stronger against russia than obama's policies against russia. we armed ukraine, we have armed ukraine to fight them with weapons, deadly weapons which russia didn't want. biden said to the russians, said to the ukrainians, come into crimea, don't fight.

we put sanctions on the russians, we kicked out all their diplomats when they poisoned someone in london. there's been a pretty harsh policy agenda to push back on russia, it's not the same as the rhetoric we hear. a lot of that has come from the defense department. it would be interesting to see how much you have a strong anti-russia person put in -- >> you're just -- >> you dropped the sanctions. >> he dropped the sanctions yesterday, he was forced to do the sanctions by congress, he didn't want to. he complained about it, privately and publicly. and he will not say a negative word about vladimir putin, when the guy insults everybody else on the face of the planet? >> i've been on the air and said i disagree with the tone and the rhetoric of the helsinki conference, but i focus on the policy. the policy has been much more anti-russian than barack obama's policy -- >> not leaving syria. how is leaving syria being tough

on russia? you're did giving them the playing field. >> i don't agree with it. i think that we are -- we should -- the president's been successful in syria up to this point, that's what's amazing about this, he has done things. we bombed a portion of syria directly against the wishes of the russians and we went right against them and carried out the mission anyway. we have put troops on the ground in russia. we did bomb the syrians when they used chemical weapons, which president obama would not do. up until this point he's been strong on his syria policy. i think that's the right policy. >> you don't see this as a bottom? you don't see this as a point where your party is going to have to make a judgment about what it is and what it isn't? >> you sit back and look at this analytically, there's a movement of people that have a populous nationalist agenda, they elected the president to carry out that agenda. they always knew there woe be people on here saying, 24 is chaos. that's what theyen watted to see happen. they wanted the system of the

way things were done on trade, immigration and foreign -- putting our military needs to be blown up, needs to be changed. and the president is carrying out exactly what he ran on. >> choices create opportunities and they're going to fall right on your plate coming in in january, paul. there's a plus/minus to that. you guys are coming into power at a good time, in terms of having a table set with problems, we have problems here. what you'll do about it, what choices you'll make, we'll see. what do you think the biggest ambition will be for democrats? >> the very first bill they're going to introduce is on voting writes. the president promised to drain the swamp. i think reforming that system to make it work for the middle class is really important. then they're going to move to things like health care, the president says he wants to reduce the cost of prescription drugs, he's done nothing about it. the president should call his bluff on that. >> what you're going to see, you're going to see the democrats controlling the house,

passing bills that help the american middle class, that help them get to work easier. help them pay their prescription drug bills, help them pay their insurance bills. and then they're going to kick it over to the republicans, and they're either going to pass it or wish they had. the democrats won the biggest landslide in a midterm they've won in 40 years, they won it because they ran on middle classclass iss issues. many people who had faith in him have been conned by don. that's -- >> here's what their agenda is. investigate and impeach, a lot of establishment democrats are nai naive. we've been through it in our party. they're starting to see what happens when the left wing of your base pushes you to the place where you can't go back from. you have presidential candidates in iowa being asked, what about this investigation, what do we do? >> they're going to overplay their hand just like they did in the kavanaugh hearings. >> mike's smarter than me on

everything. >> i know what the democrats plans are better than my republican -- >> we've lived through the changes that you haven't lived through yet. >> working people in this country who donald trump has buy trade with all of his policies. >> you're both right in one way. paul, you have to see which ways you guys are going to evolve on this. mike, you say you've lived through it, i don't know that's true. you have to figure out where you are. if i don't hear from you before that, merry christmas. >> be well. all kinds of chaos erupting in the season finale of the 2018 version of the trump show. will his base continue to stand by him if he doesn't get the wall? is it so important it's worth risking everything? eks with mav, i was cured and left those doubts behind. i faced reminders of my hep c every day. but in only 8 weeks with mavyret, i was cured.

even hanging with friends i worried about my hep c. but in only 8 weeks with mavyret, i was cured. mavyret is the only 8-week cure for all common types of hep c. before starting mavyret your doctor will test if you've had hepatitis b which may flare up and cause serious liver problems during and after treatment. tell your doctor if you've had hepatitis b, a liver or kidney transplant, other liver problems, hiv-1, or other medical conditions, and all medicines you take including herbal supplements. don't take mavyret with atazanavir or rifampin, or if you've had certain liver problems. common side effects include headache and tiredness. with hep c behind me, i feel free... ...fearless... ...and there's no looking back, because i am cured. talk to your doctor about mavyret. not long ago, ronda started here. and then, more jobs began to appear. these techs in a lab. this builder in a hardhat... ...the welders and electricians who do all of that.

the diner staffed up 'cause they all needed lunch. teachers... doctors... jobs grew a bunch. what started with one job spread all around. because each job in energy creates many more in this town. energy lives here.

the president's abrupt withdrawal from syria has general mattis walking. he is no longer the secretary of defense. and now a defense official with direct knowledge tells cnn the military has been ordered to withdraw half of our troops from gang stan. even before we get to whomever the president picks as the next

secretary of defense, there are questions about congress's role in all of this. let's get to that with matt gates who sits on the armed services committee. merry christmas to you and the family. >> merry christmas to you too, chris. >> scary day for you? >> not a scary day. i think it's always concerning when there's a major change in an area as volatile as syria. we've only trained up 20% of the forces necessary to secure the northern portions of the country and then in southern syria, i don't know what the answer is to ensure there's not permanent iranian presence that threatens our ally israel. syria has been a powder keg, we've been successful in driving out isis, you have turkey there, russia there, and i think it's a difficult situation. >> given our past conversations, i'm betting president gates doesn't make this move? you don't leave syria right now, you don't think isis is over. you don't think that war is over. and you think there's a lot of wood left to chop. how do you explain this?

>> i would not remove u.s. influence in syria. i think there are ways we can exercise that influence that don't necessarily require a tremendous troop deployment there, i think the utilization of contractors to engage in more of a train and equip mission for local forces working with our allies to set up safe zones for people that are really trapped in a humanitarian crisis. those are things we can work with our allies on, work with the international community on. when i'm with the president, i can tell you, he is not someone who wants to maintain a foreign presence that is outsized for the united states of america. i think he wants to see more of america's moms and dads at home, and less of our treasure being spilled decade after decade in the middle east with little to show for it. >> the concern is about whether or not leaving means have you to go back in a bigger way. we've lived this story now twice. obama made a mistake doing this, president george w. bush made a mistake doing it this way.

it seemed that secretary mattis didn't want to be part of not learning that lesson. how concerned are you he's leaving? >> he's a great american, he's a patriot. i've enjoyed working with him, the department of defense was operating effectively and efficiently under his leadership. there are other folks that can be secretary of defense. i'm not scared or frightened that he's leaving. the president is intitled to a secretary of defense that is more in line with his world view. >> the generals are gone, and they've been such a big selling point for the president, don't worry, we'll be fine, look at all these generals i have around me. now there are none left. >> i think there are few generals that work for the president of the united states. >> all of them work for the president of the united states. we'll have to see who replaces them now. having steven miller come out to calm the american people on a day like today. let me ask you this, the

shutdown is also royaling things, are you comfortable with a shutdown over christmas, because of a wall that comes down to a dollar amount. >> i don't think this is about the wall, i think it's about depriving the president of a win on a campaign issue that was central to his election. the hypocrisy among senate democrats is ridiculous. 10 senate democrats have voted on the appropriations package that includes $25 billion for border security. they're not i'd yo logically opposed. our local governments we had to save them from being overrun. >> it's true. >> again, i don't think this is really even about immigration, i think here at the end of republican control, the president wants to squeeze out another westein, his base expec that reasonably. >> i think you have to be honest about what's happening, though. the wall is a farce the way it's presented by the president. as you know, you've done your

homework on this. they want more barrier systems. sometimes it's that big fence with the slots, other times it's masonitis, other times it's different kinds of wire. they need different things in different places. fair enough, that's what they need. the cell on the wall was a brand new wall, the whole stretch of the thing and mexico's going to pay for it. that was never ever going to happen. doesn't he have to let that dream die and replace it with the reality of getting as much money as you can to secure the border. >> if you've heard the president's remarks this last week, he's focused on the family that needs to feel safe in their communities. if the senate will pass what they passed out of committee with 10 votes, 25 billion more for border security. i would encourage the president to take that. >> why won't he? >> well, look, that has not been offered. i don't think the senate is willing to do that dhs package

with the full 25 billion for border security. if they're willing to do 25 billion for border security. >> they brought that to him and he backed away because republicans wanted to tack on more different types of aspects of legal immigration curtailment as well. . >> there are elements of legal immigration that still need a great deal of reform, increasing in some areas, decreasing in others, what's less strategic for the u.s. economy. the question is whether or not you view immigration as some social engineering project or whether immigration ought to be an economic development tool for the country. i think for democrats it's more about the social engineering, for republicans we want the folks here that we need to have a thriving dynamic -- >> what does that mean, social engineering -- >> well, i'm talking about the chain migration where we're not necessarily bringing the most qualified, competent people -- >> you mean the way the first laidy got her parents into the country? >> i'm not saying that people who followed the laws as they were written did anything wrong. i'm saying that's not the most

strategic economic development path. i know plenty of people who've come here from chain migration. that doesn't mean it was the best choice for the country. >> right. but as a policy -- what you've done right now is we have a stalemate, right? on the border. you have a flow that the system can't handle. and you're now all caught up in the politics of a wall which is at best one part of a very complex set of solutions. >> no, that's not true. we've tried to pass e-verify. the senate won't take it up. we've tried to change the country caps so that people from one country aren't penalized because not enough people from another country have been let in the country -- >> mcconnell runs the senate. >> i don't think he's running it all that well. if he were really serious about delivering on this we'd take the votes we have and pass this bill -- >> so what's going to happen if it shuts down? what are you going to tell people over christmas? >> i think we need to give the american people a sense of comfort that in january, in 2019 the government will be open. i think the president could make that assurance if he chose to.

but that he could keep every senator and every member of the house here over the break, over christmas, working to do everything we possibly can in these final moments to use your favorite sports metaphor, run through the tape or go through the echo of the whistle to make sure we get the most out of the republican majority we have. i know this, chris. from the standpoint of my voters we're not going to get a better deal when nancy pelosi is speaker. we're invested in trying to get the most border security we can. >> i tell you what. it's an interesting solution about forcing their hand to keep them. the problem you have is everything that's happened like today, this president doesn't have the ability to keep your party in town in the senate. they left. they left with smiles on their faces. >> i think they're coming back. >> we'll see. matt gaets. the best to you for christmas. i'll be talking to you soon. >> all the same to you, chris. >> be well. the dysfunction we're seeing goes far beyond any of the president's decisions. it is time for the people in congress to do the job they were put there to do. we're going to give you a closing argument on that. that's the solution. next.

if i built a van, it would carry my entire business. i'd make it available in dozens, make that thousands of configurations. it would keep an eye on my fleet. [ beeping ] and an eye out for danger. with active brake assist. if i built a van, i'd make it available in diesel and gas. and i'd build it right here, in south carolina. introducing the all new sprinter starting at $33,790. built in the usa. mercedes-benz. vans. born to run. mauntil i held her.diabetes wasn't my top priority. i found my tresiba® reason. now i'm doing more to lower my a1c. once daily tresiba® controls blood sugar for 24 hours for powerful a1c reduction. tresiba® is a long-acting insulin used to control high blood sugar in adults with diabetes. don't use tresiba® to treat diabetic ketoacidosis, during episodes of low blood sugar, or if you are allergic to any of its ingredients. don't share needles or insulin pens. don't reuse needles. the most common side effect is low blood sugar, which may cause dizziness, sweating, confusion, and headache. check your blood sugar.

low blood sugar can be serious and may be life-threatening. injection site reactions may occur. tell your prescriber about all medicines you take and all your medical conditions. taking tzds with insulins like tresiba® may cause serious side effects like heart failure. your insulin dose shouldn't be changed without asking your prescriber. get medical help right away if you have trouble breathing, fast heartbeat, extreme drowsiness, swelling of your face, tongue or throat, dizziness or confusion. i found my tresiba® reason. find yours. ask your diabetes care specialist about tresiba®. with retirement planning and advice for what you need today and tomorrow. because when you're with fidelity, there's nothing to stop you from moving forward.

unparalleled disruption. even the most ardent trump folk are a little quiet. many of you said you liked idea that trumpism would shake things up, mess with the system. dynamic disruption. well, this is what that looks like. happy? the moment as metaphor. in the dark hour as economic and foreign and domestic policies implode in support of trumpism, among republican ranks goes quiet, who comes out to represent the white house, to address this anxious country? this guy. steven miller. a young man who has come to represent much of what people reject about trumpism. why him? the president should have been out there. he should be out there right now. and you know what? he knows it. he knows that the president should be talking to me. he should be talking to all of you. and telling us why this will be okay. what his plan is. that he he has an explanation. instead he posted a video of

himself singing "green acres" just minutes before mattis resigned. a shutdown over the wall, the stock market plummeting certainly in part because of trumpism. and then came the big quit. the break point for mattis deserves notice. the president cuts and runs in syria, reportedly as turkey told him to get out of the way and as putin gave him a pat on the ass on the way out. trump's response? i think i'll do it again. in afghanistan. didn't you see what happened with bush and obama? you really think we've won the war against isis? there are tens of thousands of them still out there. and more importantly, it's in the vacuum of our presence. when we're not there. that's when we've seen taliban, al qaeda, isis, the weak and the marginalized fall under their control. just like in iraq after "mission accomplished." like in afghanistan with the taliban. so where does it all leave us? the generals are gone. the real wall, the one between this president and his poorest instincts is gone. who now? who do we look to?

the new chief of staff mick mulvaney, sturdy conservative from congress, but also the man who referred to our president as a demagogue, who embarrassed him during the election and gave childish and simplistic answers. that man is now arguably his closest counsel. how long can that last? but here's the part too many are missing in all this trump mania. our government does not begin and end with the presidency. certainly not this one. this is the moment for congress, left and right, to take back the power and start doing its job. standing back, watching, has not served you or your constituents well. you can pass laws. you can do it vetoproof. budget issues, immigration. is it really so far-fetched, so hard to imagine that 2/3 of you can agree on what america is about? issues like syria, afghanistan, they're actually easier. we all believe it's all about the president because you've led us to that misbelief.

you have surrendered your power to this president and others. the constitution gives you the duty to declare war, not the president. you've run from it. because you're afraid of what happened when you voted for the war in iraq. you don't want to own it. and frankly, it was going on before that. do your duty. stop talking about it and do it. review the authorization for the use of military force. demand that the president come to you as the law and the constitution commands. this moment is a low point for this president. but his inadequacy is not your excuse. this moment means something for you, congressmen and women, as well. you are on notice that you must do more. i know you're all leaving to go be with your family. we'll see what happens with the shutdown. but that's the way it looks. while you're there, think about what they expect. just shaking your head and those uneasy laughs that we all have these days about how crazy everything is in d.c., it's not

enough. you wanted power. you have it. you raised your hand. now use it. and get things done. history is being written and you are wrong to think that the beginning and end of the story will be president trump. what will history say about you in this moment? thank you for watching. "cnn tonight" with d-lemon starts right now. >> it's like the wizard of oz, chris. seriously. and once you expose the man behind the curtain you see what you get. we saw in the oval office with nancy pelosi and chuck schumer that -- and all of these lawmakers seem to be afraid of him when their greatest power is if they stand up to the president and to the rule of law and to the constitution. >> they have a duty to do so. this last election reinforced that mandate. they shouldn't have needed that example for it to be made manifest in their own actions. you saw mitch mcconnell come out tonight. a little strong for him.