>> reporter: jeanne moos, cnn, new york. >> the hand motion is somehow so special. thank you for joining us. bye-bye. for hundreds of thousands of people tonight, it is not a good evening. a good evening would be knowing that tomorrow, friday is payday and the bills are being taken care of. this evening, though, they've got empty pay stubs and growing troubles. many are furloughed. many are working without pay. coast guard officers, tsa screeners, air traffic controller, u.s. marshals guarding drug lord el chapo, border agents. yes, border agents. day 20 of the government shutdown over border wall funding, and some of the men and women president trump met today on his visit to mcallen, texas, are on the job but not getting paid. now back home, he is reportedly getting closer to declaring a national emergency to get the wall built. and according to new cnn reporting, the administration is examining the idea of funding the wall with disaster relief

money. you heard that right. the trump administration is examining, actively examining the notion of using unspent money earmarked for disaster reconstruction in puerto rico, texas, california, florida, and elsewhere. keeping them honest, that idea is a long way away from president trump's recent claim that unspecified economic gains from the replacement for nafta would supposedly and indirectly pay for the wall. it is even farther away from the oft repeated promise that mexico would pay for the wall. lest we forget, cue the montage. >> i promise, we will build the wall. >> and who's going to pay for the wall? who's going to pay for the wall? >> mexico! >> who? >> mexico! >> it's going to be a great wall. mexico is going to pay for the wall. >> mexico is going to pay for the wall. >> mexico will pay for the wall. >> so that was a lie, perhaps the most widely repeated one since "the check is in the

mail." mexico is not going pay for the wall. now perhaps puerto rico will. and speaking of checks in the mail, before leaving for the border today, and once again after he arrived, the president said this. >> when you say mexico is going pay for the wall, you never expected that they would write you a check. but during your campaign -- >> i don't expect. excuse me. when i say mexico's going to pay for the wall, do you think they're going to write a check for $20 billion or $10 billion or $5 billion or two cents? no. they're paying for wall in a great trade deal. >> silly us. he didn't say mexico should just write a check. i mean, how stupid can you be to even think that? and what kind of dummy can believe that after looking at the president's campaign website and reading the words, and i'm quoting from the campaign website, it's an easy decision for mexico. make a one-time payment of $5 billion to $10 billion to make sure that $24 billion continues to flow into their country, year after year. that's right. just one easy payment. operators were standing by. but wait, there is more. how about some tex-mex word

salad. >> they say a wall is medieval. well, so is a wheel. a wheel is older than a wall. and i looked at every single car out there, even the really expensive ones that the secret service use, and believe me, they are expensive. i said do they all have wheels? yes. oh, i thought it was medieval. the wheel is older than wall, you know that? and there are some things that work. you know what? a wheel works and a wall works. nothing like a wall. >> nothing like a wall, he says. as we like to point out, the merits of a wall aren't for us to say. they're for you to decide. but the president is supposed to make the case for it honestly. anyone who is working without pay deserves to know why, deserves not to be treated like a pawn or used in a photo op or have their paycheck sacrificed on their behalf without their say so. at the end of the day, no matter where you may stand politically,

we all deserve a president who even if you disagree with him, takes responsibility for his decisions. and to his credit, that's what president trump did in that meeting with senator schumer and speaker pelosi. he told them on camera about the shutdown, quoting, i will take the mantle. i will be the one to shut it down. i am not going blame you for it, unquote. it's like when harry truman said of himself "the buck stops here." it's strong stuff, except we learned today the president never meant that. >> the buck stops with everybody. >> yeah, not me. everybody. the buck stops with everybody. the whole idea of the buck stopping is that it stops with one person, the leader, the person in charge. not with this president. for a guy who has spent his life hoarding money, this is one buck he clearly does not want, which is weird, because during the campaign i seem to recall him saying how he and he alone was the only one who could solve the nation's problems. if only we had another montage. >> i alone can fix it.

>> nobody builds walls better than me. >> this is so easy. >> we're going to fix it. >> who can fix things better than me? >> i'll fix it. >> i'm the only one who can fix it. >> i'm the only one, believe me. i know them all. >> the only one that knows how to fix it. >> i alone can fix it. >> i guess that means that he alone can work the tower at kennedy and run the national parks and rescue boaters and run the nih and screen the bags and guard el chapo. more on the breaking news that the president is considering a national emergency and that the money to build a wall might be money that was originally earmarked to rebuild disaster areas. barbara starr joins us from the pentagon with that. so this is new to me. what are you learning about this whole notion that money for disaster areas could go to the wall? >> i think it's new to everybody tonight, anderson. what we are hearing from administration officials is indeed they are looking at unspent disaster recovery funds from floods and some of the bad storms and hurricanes that we've

had, places like puerto rico, texas, florida, california, looking at some of the money that was earmarked for disaster relief to specifically help the people that need the help the most and see if they can legally take that money, shift it over to their plan to build this wall. it's a bit of uncharted territory. the president would have to declare that national emergency first. he may run into legal challenges. but the law is there. and by all accounts, they are looking very seriously tonight at trying to take advantage of it. looking not just at disaster recovery money, but military construction projects at bases across the country that are aimed at keeping the military ready. so the bottom line, if you're going to take money from any of these places, something is not getting done. anderson? >> so just to be clear, the president may be taking money away from areas hit by disasters, areas like puerto rico, in order to build the

wall? i'm surprised that that is really under consideration. >> under consideration, look, is a negotiating tactic. is it really going to happen? how will congress and the courts react to all of this? but this is what's on the table, and they're looking at the potential of a 300-mile construction project, possibly using military troops, contracts, or the army corps of engineers. a lot of questions still to be answered. it seems like they want to get their hands on the money, if you will, and then figure out all of these answer after that. >> so if the president does declare a national emergency, how soon could construction on a wall begin? >> it would be about anal i 18-h project. but some officials are saying they could begin building that high steel slat wall that they're talking about within 45 days. but there are still other complications. there are areas where potentially the federal government does not own the land. they would have to invoke eminent domain, take that property away from private property owners potentially. that may take them right into

court. so all of this very theoretical. you say 45 days? it could be stuck in the courts for some time, barbara starr, thank you very much. >> sure. >> the president's trip according to a report in "the new york times," the president said he did not even want to make. that's what he reportedly told news anchors in a background briefing before his trip tuesday. he said he was talked into going by his advisers and dismissed it as pointless. we'll go next to jim acosta in act allen, texas. how much closer is the president tonight to declaring a national emergency, jim? >> well, he said, anderson, he is still thinking about it. he told reporters earlier today that his adviser, lawyers at the white house have told him that he could do this, he could declare this national emergency and that it would stand up in court. one thing that his advisers have been telling him is that the more he talks about this being a crisis and an emergency and so on, that would actually strengthen their case. anderson, the president may see declaring this national emergency down on the border as a way out of this fix he has gotten himself into. essentially, he has painted

himself into a corner on this wall fight. and basically, by reopening the government but declaring a national emergency, he knows democrats will take him to court. it will be tied up, as barbara said, for some time. but at the same time, he could go back to his base and say see? i reopened the government. i got things going again, but at the same time, i took things as far as i could go in terms of getting emergency funding for a wall on the southern border with mexico. but at this point, anderson, it's not exactly clear the president will pull that trigger. he keeps talking as if he might do it, but we haven't gotten a firm sense as to whether he will actually go to that drastic measure. >> and talk about the president's visit to the border today. what happened? >> well, it's interesting, anderson. as much as i guess the president grumbled privately that he shouldn't make a trip down here and he thought it was waste of time, i guess there were some other officials we talked to who have heard the same thing and said the same thing, the president came down here, met with border patrol agents, met with other law enforcement officials, and at one point said

that the nation is under attack down here on the border. now, anderson, i can tell you here in act allmcallen, texas, community has consistently been ranked one of the safest communities in the country. so the president picked sort of a curious spot to make that case. and anderson, just so you know, there is not a wall all along mcallen, texas. there are various spots where there is no wall at all. there is fencing, there is chain-link fencing. i went to an rv park this evening where there are rvs right along the river where people can play shuffle board and drive around in their golf carts, and they're not being besieged by convoys and caravans of migrants coming in and causing all kinds of crime and mayhem. so what you saw earlier today, anderson, is the president hyping this case for a wall on the border, just as he has been spreading other misleading statements. for example, as you were saying earlier. and he said this time and again when he was down here in the border area talking with law enforcement officials. he said, well, i never said we would write a check to mexico,

when of course his campaign put out statements saying mexico can end this once and for all and make a one-time payment of $5 billion to 10 billion to the united states. so yes, the president did try to make this case down here, half hearted as it may have been. but also, many points throughout the day, anderson, making a lot of misleading statements because he knows he's kind of running out of time in making this case to the american people that he should have this wall on the border. anderson? >> jim acosta, jim, thanks. i want to dig deep were kirsten powers, former trump campaign aide and david gergen, who has advised presidents dating back to the nixon administration. steve, the president today saying i never said mexico would, you know, write a check for $5 billion or whatever. his website actually did say that. i mean, he repeatedly said mexico will pay for it, and they specifically pointled out that it could be a one-time payment. >> right. well, look, i think mexico still

will pay for it. i think that's very viable. >> he lied about it today saying he never said that when he does, he did? >> you would have to ask him. but i think the most sensible way to get them to pay for it is a tax remit tense. i think that's a very painless way. >> it doesn't concern you that the president just lies like water flowing down a river? >> no, hold on. i think you need to be careful when you say lies. when he said mexico was going to write a check, that was hyperbole, clearly, an applause line at rallies. >> it was actually a line on a website that nobody was applauding for. >> right. but that's not from him. >> there it is. >> look, i don't think any serious -- i don't think any serious person believed that mexico was going to hand us a gigantic check with "wall" in the memo. you don't pay for the wall up-front. >> you don't think thousands of people who heard him say and who themselves chanted "mexico is going to pay for it" and read that website in which he says it will be a one-time payment, you think people just don't think that he is making it up? >> i think that -- i think that americans whether they're border

patrol agents, whether they're people all across america who care about our sovereignty, i think they want first of all border security. secondly, it does make sense for mexico to pay. i think it's fair and just that they pay. whether they pay up front or over time, to me doesn't make very much difference. >> kerstin? to you, does it seem that the president has just lied about this? and today lied about lying about it? >> yeah, i just don't understand, steve, you're basically saying we shouldn't expect that what he said would happen would happen. he said this over and over. i mean, you've seen the montage. you've seen the website. so i guess if that doesn't bother you, i think it was pretty clear that he was saying mexico would pay for it. and the reason he is saying that is because it's really, really expensive. and if he wasn't saying that, he would have to say i'm going to spend, you know, 10s of billions of dollars of your money, americans, building this wall. and that's not what people wanted to hear, because it's not something that, a, we even need.

it's a manufactured crisis. there is no crisis no matter how many times they say it at the border. this has been debunked over and over. it's not going to stop any terrorists from coming in. it's not going to stop the drugs that he claims are coming through there, because they're not coming through that way. they're coming through ports of entry. people fly into the country. so i think it does matter that he said this, and he's gotten himself in a real bind because of it, because of making a promise that he can't keep. >> david, if it is so insulting for you to say that it's a manufactured crisis, because you know who doesn't believe it by the way? >> oh, god. heerp we go. >> who cares about my opinion. the front line cops who are guarding the front door of america, customs and border protection. they tell us it's a crisis. their union wants a wall. 89% of the union in polling tells us they want a wall. i don't know how we can sit in tv studio and pontificate to them and tell them it's not a crisis. >> literally nobody else can

have an opinion about it except for them? there can be no other facts how drugs come into the country or how terrorists come into the country? >> i'm saying their opinion is incredibly important, and it shouldn't be -- >> no, you're saying it's the only thing that matters. there actually are other facts. >> it's not the only thing. but i think it's incredibly important and perhaps the most important opinion of all is what do the frontline cops who are protecting america, what do they say the swieituation is like. >> i don't hear you saying we got to listen to the frontline troops, the privates, the sergeants, the master sergeants and the generals when donald trump says -- attacks his generals. by your argument, the military folks on the ground are the main people we should listen to. donald trump certainly doesn't believe that in the case of the military. >> tell me what situation you're talking about. i don't know what you mean. >> making fun of mcmaster,

making fun of mattis, not listening, not taking their advice. that's not listening to the people on the frontlines. him attacking the guy whose running the war in afghanistan. >> look, he is the commander in chief. whether it's the border, whether it's syria or afghanistan, the decision rests with him. >> but he is saying he knows more than those people. why does he know more than generals, but he doesn't know more or nobody knows more than these unnamed border patrol officers who work very hard who we're talking about? >> right. they're not a name, first of all. brandon judd has been all over television telling us. >> a union official. >> what i'm saying -- right. and his membership, by the way. but what i'm saying is this. customs and border protection, which is the most hispanic agency in the federal government, which has been unfairly demonized constantly by the left, that group has told us this is the resource we need to secure the border. on top of that, it just makes

sense for anybody who looks. >> i don't think they said this is the resource. in fact, they're understaffed right now. and so i'm sure there are plenty of border officer. >> o. >> it's not the resource. david gergen, we haven't heard from you. if the president does declare a national emergency and order a border wall built, which is where this seems it's headed, to get the government reopened, is that the best option at this point? because then it ends up in the courts. how do you see that? >> well, from trump's point of view i guess it's the best of a bad set of options. he's got himself in a corner. he is desperately looking for a way out. he is turning to this ridiculous idea of taking money away from puerto rico and california and other places and putting it on what is not a serious crisis. look, the most important -- there are all sorts of people around this country, special interests who have got their hands out all the time for money from washington. the most important people in this case are the members of congress. they are the ones who decide how money should be spent, what sort

of priorities we should set in terms of spending. and the president had a republican congress, republican senate and a house for two years, and we never dealt with this as an emergency. there was no effort to get them to come up with the money, and now that he can't get a consensus, he ought to do what most presidents do. he ought to go back to the drawing board, try to form a new consensus, find a compromise and not go down this crazy road we're going on right now. he is treating the money that congress puts forward on specific things, he is treating like a piggy bank that he the president can come and over the top of the heads of whatever congress and spend it. that is not what the constitution says. this is an end-run around the constitution. it's an end-run around the congress. and ought to be very clear about that. >> kerstin, it is kind of incredible, if in fact they do take money for reconstruction in puerto rico or elsewhere. we didn't hear from the white house there is a crisis in

puerto rico for the months and the months and the months that people were dying in the wake of the storm. i'm not talking about in the immediate storm itself. >> yeah. >> in the months after the storm, the thousands of people who we now know died because they didn't get a ventilator or they couldn't get their medication for diabetes or for asthma or whatever it was, the thousands of people that died, you didn't hear them every single night from the white house, a drumbeat saying this is a crisis, this is a crisis. thousands of people have died, and they weren't saying on the news every night this is a national crisis. >> yeah. >> now they're going to take money from those people, from the people in puerto rico for this? how is that going to play? >> it's outrageous to take money really from frankly anything to pay for the wall. the campaign promise he made was mexico is going to pay for the walls. we have to always remember that. this was never supposed to be

coming out of -- being paid for by the taxpayers and certainly not being taken from very important things like disaster relief. and so i think that, you know, and the fact that we have people that are right now going without pay, having to work for free and with no end in sight, and the president keeps claiming that he's negotiating, but all he is really doing is saying give me what i want. give me what i want. that's my negotiation. >> well, we got to leave there it. kirsten powers, david gergen, thank you. the voices against declaring a national emergency over this. also the potential safety impact for just about every important federal worker from the baggage screeners to air traffic controllers. and later michael cohen's new starring role. what he might say in his upcoming testimony before a house committee. we learned that today. he is going to testify publicly in front of the house february 7th. what his old client, the president, has to say about the news that he will, tonight.

it's tough to quit smoking cold turkey. so chantix can help you quit "slow turkey." along with support, chantix is proven to help you quit. with chantix you can keep smoking at first and ease into quitting. chantix reduces the urge so when the day arrives, you'll be more ready to kiss cigarettes goodbye. when you try to quit smoking, with or without chantix. you may have nicotine withdrawal symptoms. stop chantix and get help right away if you have changes in... behavior or thinking, aggression, hostility, depressed mood, suicidal thoughts or actions, seizures, new or worse heart or blood vessel problems, sleepwalking, or life- threatening allergic and skin reactions. decrease alcohol use. use caution driving or operating machinery. tell your doctor if you've had mental health problems. the most common side effect is nausea. quit smoking "slow turkey."

talk to your doctor about chantix.

more breaking news on the border showdown. it comes on top of cnn's reporting that the trump administration is weighing the possibility of tapping into disaster relief moby to build the border wall. the president declares a national emergency. moments ago "the wall street journal" posted a new story on white house aides telling the president not too. michael binder joins us by phone. what's your reporting on this? >> hey there, anderson. as much as the president is talking about his intention to declare emergency, there is some real questions about this inside the white house. kellyanne conway has been public for a couple days now saying it lets congress off the hook. we're reporting now that jared kushner has urged caution inside the white house. what he's saying in oval office meetings is listen, this cannot

be a pr stunt. if we're trying to do this to win the day on democrats, it's the wrong move. what his message has been if we do this, we have to be ready to build the wall. it has to be a means to an end and has to be the wall, not the shutdown. >> so kushner is saying don't declare a national emergency? >> well, he's saying if we -- if the white house, the administration is ready to move dirt and ready to act on a border wall, then he suggests -- he would be -- fall in line with this. but remember, this is a trump white house where messaging often runs the day. you look at the senior staff in the white house right now. i could come up with close to half a dozen people who are just messaging communications press books. that's because this president puts a lot of emphasis on

winning the pr message. and what kushner is saying here is let's slow down. even though we're three weeks -- approaching the three-week mark on the shutdown, a national emergency should only be used if we're actually willing to start moving dirt and putting up the barrier. >> what about the acting chief of staff mulvaney. do we know where he is on this? >> mulvaney, from my reporting has been, i would say, among the most consistent and most persistent, if not loudest voices in favor of this. and that goes back -- this predates his new title of acting chief of staff goes back to when he was omb chief, office of management and budget. and what we're reporting too is that -- is that it's helped. about two months ago, then secretary defense jim mattis

told trump you can declare a national emergency and the pentagon will help build the wall. and from what i'm told, this is -- that was at mulvaney's urging and mulvaney's research that led to that. so he's been among the most consistent voices in the white house urging trump to -- encouraging trump to do this. >> interesting. michael bender, thank you. the reporting is from "the wall street journal" right now. last night i reported on wendy and mark schnyder, both air traffic controllers. she has been furloughed. he is working without pay. today they got a preview of their pay tomorrow. her pay stub came to zero dollars and zero cents. mark's came $3.73. he told randi kaye he had no idea why that exact amount. air traffic controllers marched in washington today. they were joined by tsa workers since airline pilots captain joe pete is president of the airline pilots association

international. he recently wrote to the president to end a shutdown that he says is affecting the safety of the u.s. airspace. >> the president said this could go on for months or years, and in congress there is certainly no signs oa compromise. at this point do you feel discouraged? i know you were at the rally earlier today. >> yes. >> and you said things are getting very serious. >> yes. well, you know, serious, anderson, because the primary mission of the airline pilots association, our number one focus is on safety. and it concerns me as this becomes prolonged that the implication may be that it begin to affect the safety, security, and the overall efficiency of the airspace system. we have the safest airspace system, the envy of the world really right now. and it has a lot -- that ecosystem has a lot of moving parts to it. and it concerns me because, i mean, when you look at the number of people who now will go without a paycheck tomorrow, it

becomes quite serious. >> in your letter to the president, you wrote that the government shutdown is, quote, adversely affecting the safety, security and efficiency of our national airspace system. >> right. >> do you really belief right now travelers are less safe? >> no, not right now. let me put it to you this way. you know, just take the shutdown aside for a moment. pilots constantly make decisions on whether or not take an aircraft into the sky or going into a mission or looking at anything, whether it's safe or not. we're basically risk experts when it comes to stuff like that. and the same thing for the air traffic controllers. but it is difficult to judge if something like this is prolonged as to what affect it might have on the system. >> can you break down for us what happens in a government shutdown for, you know, for employees that you represent, for air traffic controllers, for tsa people? >> sure. >> obviously, we've been reporting on tsa personnel, you know, calling in sick, needing

to in some cases look for other jobs. and air traffic control is certainly a huge example. >> oh, it is. and i think that is really the sad part, because really what's at stake here from tlaiber, and i am a labor leader obviously as well, the impact it has on the livelihood of these individuals, and the stressors they are under right now. so it doesn't surprise me that after coming to work with not being paid and the long hours that they're facing right now, that's the impact. so there is impact -- it has a bad impact on them and their lives and a bad impact on the safety and security, like i mentioned, and also on the future of their profession. it probably will affect people's willingness to want to step into a profession like that and possibly experience the same thing. >> it's also hard to calculate the impact, you know, just the anxiety, the concern about making payments on your house. >> right. >> about sending your kids to day care.

all of the day to day financial decisions somebody has to make when all of that is up in the air. we're all distracted. >> you're absolutely right. and here at the airline pilots association, we have programs to help our members do it. and the impact on the aviation economy is going to be great. and what worries me is the impact on safety. and you know, anderson, pilots do their jobs every day, and so do controllers. what we're asking and the reason i sent that letter to the president of the united states and also to congress is to make them or ask them to do their jobs. it's just a shame because we, again, we are the envy of the world in terms of the efficiency and safety of our aviation system. we have moved 2/3 of the world's population when you think about it, and america, listen very closely here. this is really important. safely to their destination without any fatalities since 2009. and when you consider that we're

putting people in metal tubes in the lower stratosphere, that's an enviable record. and we do that through a very aggressive -- we used to take a forensic approach towards trying to figure out what went wrong on a flight or anything like that. now it's a risk predictive model. now it's even more important to have everybody at their station with the resources they need to do that mission. >> captain depete, i appreciate your time tonight. thank you. >> thank you. >> one note. we reached out to the faa about the concerns raised over air safety, and they said in part the traveling public can be assured that our nation's air system safe. our air traffic controllers and technicians who maintain the nation's airspace system continue to work without pay to fill a critical mission to ensure the public's safety. we sincerely thank faa employees who are working to keep the traveling public and our skies safe. when we come back, michael cohen is going to go to capitol hill.

he has agreed to testify before the house oversight committee next month. the latest on that. [clap, clap] ♪ hey, jen, which tie says, "trustworthy but also fun"? gold down, oil up. oil down, gold up. this is too busy. we need to make sure people can actually use this stuff. which one says, "hours of free live streaming coverage without cable or subscription fees"? aluminum, aluminum? you ready, zack? oh, we're ready. welcome to the show. let's make finance make sense. ♪ back pain can't win. thankfully there's aleve back and muscle pain. aleve targets tough pain for up to 12 hours with just one pill. aleve back & muscle.

all day strong. all day long. we're finally going on the trip i've been promising. because with expedia, i saved when i added a hotel to our flight. ♪ so even when she outgrows her costume, we'll never outgrow the memory of our adventure together. unlock savings when you add select hotels to your existing trip. only when you book with expedia.

tap one little bumper and up go your rates. what good is having insurance if you get punished for using it? news flash: nobody's perfect. for drivers with accident forgiveness, liberty mutual won't raise your rates due to your first accident. switch and you could save $782 on home and auto insurance. call for a free quote today. liberty mutual insurance. ♪ liberty. liberty. liberty. liberty. ♪ the democrats have only been

in charge of the house for a week. four weeks from today the president's former lawyer michael cohen will testify publicly before the house oversight committee. two sources tell cnn that cohen consulted with the special counsel's office before agreeing to testify. our senior white house correspondent pamela brown joins us now with the latest on this. what more do we know about this testimony? >> well, for the first time, anderson, michael cohen, the president's former attorney and long-time fixer will be testifying publicly in front of the house oversight committee, and michael cohen is a key figure. he is the first person close to trump, connect odd the russia probe that the house oversight committee has called before them, and he can offer a wealth of information. of course, as you know, he pleaded guilty to the hush money story, the presidential campaign paying off two women to silence them. he said that he did that at the direction of donald trump, and he was with donald trump for more than a decade, involved with the trump organization. finances, trump tower moscow.

so it is expected that congress members will be asking michael cohen about all of these topics. and michael cohen has been sort of taunting president trump today about this. he has been tweeting retweets about what he could discuss with congress about russia, about the hush money payments. and let's not forget, he has been the target of attacks by president trump and rudy giuliani, the president's attorney, over the last several months since he has been cooperating with robert mueller and sdny prosecutors. they say he is a liar. they say he is weak. so michael cohen wants to use it as an opportunity to publicly testify in an effort to clear his name before he heads off to prison the following month in march. anderson? >> are there limitations -- can he talk about anything related he's told mueller? can he talk about stuff he told the southern district of new york? or can he go into trump organization stuff? >> that's the big question, because that is still under investigation.

and we don't know when the mueller probe is going to wrap up, but there is a very good chance it could still be ongoing when he testifies in early february. but the expectation is that at the very least, he will be speaking to lawmakers about the russia probe behind closed doors that is something that michael cohen's lawyer has communicated to congress members about sort of the parameters of any testimony, because a lot of what he knows, the knowledge he has on the russia probe is still very much under investigation. and as you said there in your lead-in to me, he did consult with mueller's team before agreeing to testify to the congress members. >> pamela brown. pamela, thanks. with me now jeffrey toobin and former prosecutor jennifer rodgers. >> oh, my gosh, you think people are going to watch this? >> i clear mid calendar for the whole week. >> february 7th, boy. this is going to be amazing. >> i haven't seen you this

excited. >> come on. >> since i don't know when. >> you know, this is going to be showtime. >> but are there things he won't be able to talk about? >> probably the russia stuff is going to be in closed session with the intelligence committee. i assume the transcript will be released at some point after that. but i don't think he'll be able to talk about that in public. sorry. i didn't mean to scare you. >> no, no, i'm interested how excited you are. jennifer, things like trump organization financial history, taxes, is that all open? >> it might be. here's the one questionable part. you know, he may have some exposure there himself. he know he didn't become a full-fledged corporate with the southern district, and the reason was reportedly he wasn't willing to give up all his own criminal conduct and others close to him. >> he might have been -- >> he may have more exposure. if that conduct relates to the trump organization, then i think he might not be willing to talk about that. and the other thing is that might still be under investigation by the southern

district of new york. they may have investigations into the trump organization. they may have asked him and his lawyers that he not disclose that publicly. but if those two things are not the case, we then yes, we may hear a lot about the trump organization. >> i think the big story here is going to be something that goes on behind the scenes. when you prepare a witness for trial or for testimony, it's extremely time consuming. ten hours of preparation sometimes for every hour in the courtroom or the hearing room. will he sit with investigators and staff of the oversight committee before he testifies in public so they can organize their questioning in a way that is productive and revealing? i don't know the answer to that is whether he'll agree to do that, but if he doesn't, i think he could actually be somewhat disappointing. but if he does, all the great testimony in history in congress, oliver north, to a certain extent, but certainly john dean and all the watergate witnesses, alexander butterfield, the person who

revealed the white house tapts existed in watergate, all of that had been prepared by staff. and that's going to be very important. >> and michael cohen can decide that for himself whether or not he wants to do that? >> probably. i think that's right, although it will be a negotiation to a certain extent. i think jennifer is raising a lot of these issues. they may want to put certain subjects offlimits. if they do, then he'll agree to a negotiation. >> michael cohen has said that he sees himself as a john dean type figure. >> yeah. i think he's looking to be cooperative. that's certainly what he is saying. if he means that, i think he will sit down with them. he is going to prison. he may want to cut that time short. he is still looking to cooperate in a lot of ways. hopefully as jeff says he will. >> if he really wanted to cooperate, to your point, there were things -- he wasn't a full cooperating witness. >> he had a very bizarre situation when he pleaded guilty. most people plead guilty, and they either have an agreement or they don't.

he pleaded guilty. he agreed to cooperate, but he didn't have an agreement. it's an unusual situation. but it's quite clear that he is trying to appear cooperative now. and my certainly sense from talking to people involved in this case is that he wants to sort of come clean about everything now. and i expect he will try. now let's keep in mind the republicans are going to go after him like crazy. first of all, he is a convicted felon for lying, among other things. as rudy giuliani points out all the time, this is a lawyer who taped his client, which is a bizarre thing to do. so, i mean, democrats are going to treat him like he's st. francis of assisi. the republicans are going to go after this guy as, you know, the criminal that he is. >> right. although, talk about donald trump as a street fighter, michael cohen patterns himself in the same way, whether or not he is the tough guy that he claims. >> oh, yeah. we've heard him on tape talking

to reporters and stuff when he was acting as the fixer. he knows how to fight back. and he's got the goods. depending what he is able to talk about, he is going to have a lot of detail. he is going to have a lot of information. a lot of it is going to be very incriminating against the president. they can go after him all they want, but if he keeps coming back with the facts and maybe recording, whether they were appropriately made or not, that's going to be very damaging. >> no hearsay problems. what did he say? what did the president say? what did donald trump say? you're going to hear that over and over again, and he can answer those questions all he wants. >> jeff toobin, jennifer rodg s rodgers. already on your calendar. barr has already weighed in on whether or not he thinks the final mueller report should be made public when it's done. we'll talk about that ahead. y s. with all that usaa offers why go with anybody else? we know their rates are good, we know that they're always going to take care of us. it was an instant savings and i should have changed a long time ago.

it was funny because when we would call another insurance company, hey would say "oh we can't beat usaa" we're the webber family. we're the tenney's we're the hayles, and we're usaa members for life. ♪ get your usaa auto insurance quote today. walking a dog can add thouswalking this many?our day. that can be rough on pam's feet, knees, and lower back. that's why she wears dr. scholl's orthotics. they relieve pain and give her the comfort to move more so she can keep up with all of her best friends. dr. scholl's. born to move.

introducing zero account fees for brokerage accounts. and zero minimums to open an account. we have fidelity mutual funds with zero minimum investment. and now only fidelity offers four zero expense ratio index funds directly to investors. because when you invest with fidelity, all those zeros really add up. ♪ so maybe i'll win ♪ saved by zero

final mueller report should be

president trump today declined to say if he would commit to a full public release of any mueller investigation -- the mueller investigation report, telling reporters, quote, we'll have to see. there has been no collusion whatsoever. his nominee to be the next attorney general, william barr of course would have authority over that investigation, including whether to make the conclusions public. barr met with democrats on the senate judiciary committee this afternoon, including minnesota democrat amy klobuchar. she says he told her he would support releasing some information, but wouldn't guarantee a total release of the report. i spoke with the senator just

before air time. senator, when president trump says we'll see about any report from robert mueller becoming public, how does that square with what baltimore barr told you today? >> that does not square well with me. it makes me very concerned. i'm glad i finally got my meeting with mr. barr. he was originally not meeting with most of the democrats on the committee, and so i had to send out a public tweet and invite him to coffee, but it did work. and we had a lengthy meeting. and of course one of my play juror focuses was this report. when you have the white house talking about perhaps not releasing it, i think we have a major problem on our hands, because the public needs to know. now bar did pledge that he thought the public should get information that was public, but he seemed to equivocate and kind of hedge his bets about saying, well, i'd want to look at the rules. and to me the concern there is he's talking about his rather expansive view of executive power. and if he interprets it in a way

that somehow limits that report, then the public is never going to see that report. and so that's why -- that's something that i'm really going to be pushing on at the hearing. >> and i mean obviously there is a big difference between some information being made public and the entire report released in unredacted form. did you get a sense if he were deferred if he would defer to president trump on that? >> it's a 19-page memo, a private citizen, what the white house has said where he opined on obstruction of justice and how really a broad view of executive power, similar to what we saw from justice cavanaugh. so my concern is that the white house is hand picking people that have these views and now we are zeroing in on the moment, where after this lengthy investigation, where we've had dozens of indictments and clear

connections between the trump campaign and russia, the public has to notice. >> so just to be clear, he did not commit in anyway today to making sure that the whole report would be published? >> he committed to making, as his words as much as he could make public, those kind of things. here's the problem when you are the attorney general, you can perhaps limit, issue an opinion for what comes out. that's what bothers me about this. there may be grey area in between where he will make determination. we can't see the whole report. >> in true to michael cohen's testimony, be tfr house oversight committee. you want top question him, yourself. what do house colleagues do ask him? that is potentially fascinating testimony? >> i guess so. i think we want to know what he knows. you know, there is all stories we know that he taped certain things, i think we want to know or what his involvement was with

campaign or what he as much as he can possibly tell the committee that doesn't interfere with the investigation, i do find it interesting, you would think somehow as he is facing this prison sentence that the prosecutors involved in the mueller investigation must have allowed this to continue, but i would think there are, there may be some things that he can't reveal. i think we are about to find out. >> just ask for the shutdown, they are increasing a natural emergency to build a wall with military funds, at this point if it gets the government reopened, would you prapsz begrudgingly be okay with that? >> no one is happy with the president circumventing the law the congress and the house and senate at various times in december the house now has said, look, we need to reopen the government without a shutdown or

get this done without this wall. we want to give you money for security in the mix of things, like seeing some of the fencing that's there. using the best technology. there was already $1.3 billion in one of the bills. $1.6 billion in the other. they haven't spent what they spent last year. i think it's a direction from congress. for him to circumvent it to me is just wrong. i know there will be major legal challenges to that as well as perhaps legislative challenges. >> nor klobuchar, we appreciate your time. >> thank you to be on. >> let's check in with chris for what he is doing for cuomo prime time. >>boy, oh boy, if the special counsel is looking at misleading or contradictory statements to the press as evidence of obstruction of justice the president has problems. i have two guys tonight who made these kind of cases for the government to talk about how realistic that is and how it would work, also putting into

context what these manafort revelations mean, mueller talked to one of the pollsters. what does that mean for the big probe, then the big question about the national emergency, is not these legalities. would it be legal, would it not be for the president to declare? that's not the big question, the question is where would the money come from? i have some answers on that that will be very troubling for people. >> all right. chris, we'll see you in about six minutes from now. we look forward to that. coming up, an update to a story we brought to you earlier in the week, waiting for life saving experimental product. we'll be right back. days. five deals. for fifteen dollars get a different deal every weekday til six pm like endless shrimp monday admiral's feast tuesday four course feast wednesday and more. five days. five deals. fifteen dollars. see you before six.

turn up your swagger game with one a day gummies. one serving... ...once a day... ...with nutrients that support 6 vital functions... ...and one healthy you. that's the power of one a day. my lineage was the vecchios and zuccolis. through ancestry, through dna i found out that i was only 16% italian. he was 34% eastern european.

so i went onto ancestry, soon learned that one of our ancestors we thought was italian was eastern european. this is my ancestor who i didn't know about. he looks a little bit like me, yes. ancestry has many paths to discovering your story. get started for free at ancestry.com whooo! want to take your next vacation to new heights? tripadvisor now lets you book over a hundred thousand tours, attractions, and experiences in destinations around the world! like new york! from bus tours, to breathtaking adventures, tripadvisor makes it easy to find and book amazing things to do. and you can cancel most bookings up to 24 hours in advance for a full refund. so you can make your next trip... monumental! read reviews check hotel prices book things to do tripadvisor our big idaho potato truck and we're going to find it. awe man. always look for the grown in idaho seal.

we're going to update you on an interview we did tuesday night with a couple who's son is suffering from a rare disease, their son max is suffering from

pekan. a trial was being delayed. well, the head of the fda was watching and contacted us within minutes to find out what was going on. the fda told us the shutdown is impacting trials like this. so it is impacting food safety inspections. the fda reached out to sarah and has been offering assistance and device. we don't know why the timing of the trial was being affected by the shutdown. the person who indicated that to her declined to show us any correspondence or anything where they got that information. so the good news is the fda has been incredibly responsive in following up on a mom trying to save her child. the bad news is it's not something they, themselves can fix. though they tell us they will continue to try to get her answers and help her explore any possible treatment options and wish her the best. a reminder, our daily interactive newscast, get all the details, watch it week

nights 6:25 eastern facebook/anderson cooper. i want to hand it over to chris cuomo for "prime time." >> hey, i am andrew cuomo. and this is "prime time." is mueller is looking at misleading public statements to those to the press as proof of obstruction of justice as was just reported the president of the united states has trouble. we have two men who know the law and how to prosecute obstruction cases for the government. and they're here for cuomo's court. and to tackle the meeting between mueller and one of trump's campaign pollsters. how big a deal is it that manafort gave polling to a connected russian. plus the big news that michael cohen, the president's personal lawyer is going before congress and mueller said he's free to talk about whatever they want. and another big headline, the president now saying he will