the wifi even farther, past anything that stands in its way. ...well almost anything. leave no room behind with xfi pods. simple. easy. awesome. click or visit a retail store today. good evening. today the president of the united states dared the speaker of the house to disinvite him from giving the state of the union address to congress next week, so she did. this has never happened before. there is no getting past it, and there is no overstating how

utterly essentially totally bonkers it is. but keep in mind it's also a sideshow. so 33 days into a government shutdown we begin instead tonight with a suggestion. if you want to know about the state of the union, the president of the united states is not the one to ask. these people are. >> you have a 9-year-old. so how is this affecting your family? >> for him to come home and ask are we poor now, i don't need my extra milk at lunch. a 55 cent milk. >> i was sitting at home literally thinking what child, my kids or my grandkids, who's life insurance do i cash in to stay above water. >> we need to decide are we going to let our mortgage fall behind, or car payments so we can feed our children. >> when school was ready to start back here in atlanta, and she said mom, i don't have to have a snack. excuse me. it's very upsetting. >> i'm worried every day about how much food i have in my house. >> rather than go to the hospital and risk the bills from that, you just decided to take

that gamble? >> husband didn't even know i was rationing. i just -- it's sick, but the thought of having more debt was scarier than the thought of maybe dying in my sleep. >> in her case, she was rationing her insulin. that's the state of the union tonight. and so is this, an official at the union for air traffic controllers, who are on the job actually saying air safety is now being compromised. >> it is already less safe than it was a month ago when we shut down. we have critical components to safety that are not there. we have processes not there. training not taking place, distraction in the workplace. we have controllers actually reporting to us that they're making mistakes when they are giving clearances, clearing planes in places where they shouldn't be clearing them in conflict with other airplanes because they're so stressed out about how they are going to take care of their family. their livelihood is threatened at this point. this cannot go on for months and

years. it's not sustainable. >> not sustainable, yet a prolonged shutdown appears to be exactly what the white house could be planning on. according to late reporting "the washington post," white house chief of staff nick mulvaney has asked agencies for a list of highest impact programs if the shutdown continues into march and april. last night we reported that the tsa is asking screeners to relocate to fill in for other screeners who are calling in sick to work paying jobs that is the state of the union. president trump wants money for his border wall, and he is not backing down. democrats have offered money for border security, but not a wall, and they're not backing down. the president, as you know, said he was proud to take the mantle, as he called it, for this. and yet more polling tonight suggest they agree, he owns the shutdown. according to a new survey out late today, 60% say he bears a great deal of responsibility for it. that's far more than either republicans or democrats in congress. and he said he would gladly take

the blame. of course he later said the buck stops with everyone, not with him. and now he says it stops with nancy pelosi. the reality is whatever you think of walls, beaches and all the rest, the bucks have truly stopped, for people who badly need them. before this began, the president said many have told him they're happy to make sacrifices for his wall. he hasn't been saying that lately. however, his campaign adviser and daughter-in-law still are. >> so in terms of the workers who are coming to work and not getting paid, what would you say to them? >> listen, it's not fair to you, and we all get that, but this is so much bigger than any one person. it is a little bit of pain, but it's going to be for the future of our country. >> a little bit of pain, which is a lot easier to say when you're not worried about paying the bills while directing air traffic or screening bags or stopping the next terror attack or just doing the jobs we want done and doing it for free. more now from cnn's abbey philip

who joins us from the white house. does the white house think they have the upper hand in all this right now? >> anderson, this isn't exactly how the white house thought this would all end. they decided today after a week of sitting on nancy pelosi's initial letter to call her bluff, force her hand to decide whether she wanted to disinvite president trump or allow the state of the union to go forward. it turns out she decided to disinvite the president, and now the white house has to figure out what to do here. they are scrambling to figure out whether the president should even another speech, and now president trump, as you saw in his remarks earlier today is blaming democrats and really ramping up his attacks on pelosi, a sign of the frustration that he's been feeling in the last several weeks as so much of the blame has fallen on him for this shutdown. and yet again nancy pelosi seems to have the upper hand. >> and just in terms of alternate venues for the speech, do you know what they're considering? >> well, the white house aides have been considering venues either here at the white house, perhaps the oval office or the east room, or outside of the white house, perhaps on the

border, a campaign-style rally. but anderson, one of the problems that they're encountering is one what kind of venue will give the president the same kind of gravitas that he might get from the halls of congress. they are concerned, for example, that if he does a campaign-style rally, that people will simply dismiss that as a political speech. so they have pretty limited options. president trump also was not particularly happy with his last oval office address, thinking that he looked stilted and stiff. this time around they need to find a venue that will give him the same kind of oomph that he might get with all the members of coming on both sides, sitting in the audience, perhaps in some cases applauding or standing during his speech. >> he wants feedback i guess in realtime. i understand there is renewed talk about the president taking executive action to build a wall. >> it's a sign of frustration, anderson, on the part of the president, as the negotiations have basically stalled. a source close to these discussions have told cnn that the president is once again thinking about some kind of executive action. now this would be different from a declaring a national

emergency, but it would do essentially the same thing, taking money from one part of the government, applying it to the border wall. but we are also learning that in his meeting this afternoon with conservative leaders that he convened for this purpose, the president was noncommittal about declaring any kind of executive action. he didn't suggest it, though it was brought up by others in the room. what we're seeing here is conservatives really pressuring the president as well to do something. the shutdown has gone on for so long, they see the political damage, and they are also concerned that president trump might be tempted to compromise with democrats, granting, for example, what they call amnesty for dreamers. so a lot of people frustrated on both sides, but the president still not willing, it seems, to take that additional step either declare a national emergency or use some sort of executive action for now. anderson? >> abby phillip, a lot to cover. next to the capitol and cnn's manu raju. what are you thinking about speaker pelosi's thinking behind

cancelling the state of the union? >> democrats are in no mood to have the president come here to the house chamber and lecture them about the government shutdown, especially since they believe this is all the president's fault. the president said himself that he would own this, and pelosi in fact said to her caucus today in a closed door meeting i'm told, there is no point of even bringing your family here to washington next week. people took that as a sign that the state of the union was never going to happen, even before the back and forth of the letters today. now you recall the initial letter in which she urged the president to delay the state of the union until after the shutdown. she first cited security concerns, but then the president came back and his own department of homeland security said they could secure the state of the union perfectly fine. she then said it was really about furloughed employees and the fact that they're not getting paid. it's not fair for them to have to be forced to secure such an event with all these high profile public officials. in today's letter, she made mention of none of that. she said very clearly the

government needs to be reopened first before we do the state of the union. so it's clearly a point of leverage she hopes to use in the talks going forward, given the standoff we're in here heading to the fifth week of the shutdown. >> this may be a dumb question, but could he just show up and give the speech in the rotunda? could he deliver it there instead of the floor of the house? >> the short answer is no. he is going to need permission from democrats to do it in the rotunda. he is going the need permission from democrats to do it in the senate as well. he does have floor privileges to walk on to the senate floor, but to actually deliver a speech, you would need some support within the senate, because that institution operates on a concept called unanimous cons t consent, meaning everyone needs to agree. and in this environment, it's hard to see that happening. so the president is going to have to find another venue off capitol hill. >> well, definitely no unanimous consent. manu raju, thanks very much. for perspective doug brinkley and david axelrod who served as

a senior adviser to president obama. david, i wonder, could you imagine any kind of scenario under which john boehner would have blocked president obama from giving his state of the union address? >> no. i mean, you know, decorum was beginning to erode. it wasn't the state of the union, but the president made a health care speech, you'll remember, and members stood up and shouted at him. but, no, i could not conceive of that, but i also could not have conceived of a 34-day or 33-day shutdown. and it comes at a time when pelosi is the new sheriff in town. she's asserting her primacy and the institution's primacy. so it's kind of a caustic mix. >> doug, how unprecedented is this? is there anything in american history to compare it to? >> well, look, the original state of the union used to always be a handwritten message all the way up to woodrow wilson up in 1913. wilson started this tradition of it. it's really fdr who calls it the

state of the union. and then it goes from being an afternoon event to being a tv extravaganza. the big thing that donald trump's losing ostensibly is his 50-plus million viewers mandatory tv watching. but it can be postponed. i mean, ronald reagan postponed the state of the union address because of the challenger disaster, and waited a week later to do it. and of course you could go and there have been weird moments like gerald ford in 1975 actually went and said the state of the union is not good. that's what we're dealing with right now, not a good situation. >> david, this afternoon you tweeted after two years of bullying at real donald trump has found himself nose to nose with an opponent willing and able to push back, but the government remains partially shuttered, and to what end. >> yes. >> what about that? to what end does the government remain shut down? >> well, you know, here's where the democrats have a bit of a high ground, because they've offered to reopen the government and continue to negotiate on the

wall. and the president wants the leverage of a closed government to get his proposal around the wall. but, you know, i think one i think genuine and legitimate criticism is i don't think that the speaker would suggest that he not come because she was worried about security. i think she suggested he not come because she didn't want him to use the platform of the state of the union to spend an hour repeating the same argument he's made in other national addresses now, trying to make the case for why he has shut the government down and why he is fighting for the wall. as doug mentioned, she said he can come back when this is over, and she is using this as a bit of leverage to try and force the president's hand. >> doug, i mean, the president calling pelosi's decision on the state of the union a great blotch on the incredible country that we love.

this the great blotch, or the fact that 800,000 federal workers not getting paid the greater blotch on the country? >> obviously it's the 800,000. you know, look, admiral karl schultz of the coast guard having to make a plea that we're treating our coast guard servicemen and women so shabbily, so terribly that they have to go to food kitchens and the like this. is a horrific moment in american history. this is the great trump shutdown. his poll numbers are starting to go in the backwards direction. by all indications, he's being blamed for this, and i think the president needs to now respond by doing a written state of the union. if he wants to go give a campaign-like rally, he can do it. fox news will cover it. i doubt the big networks and cnn will probably cover something like that. as you mentioned, he already had a state of the union several weeks ago about the wall and networks carried it.

trump so give the written version and pelosi should invite donald trump later before summer recess to come and respond and talk to a full congress. >> david, doug is talking about polls. the fact that far more americans blame the president for the shutdown than even republicans or democrats in congress. he said he would take the mantle for shutdown. he later backtracked on that and said it's everybody's responsibility. the buck stops with everybody. it looks like he's gotten his wish. he has the mantle of it. >> there is no doubt about it. he is taking on a lot of water here, and he is steadily -- his poll numbers are declining. he is clearly being blamed for this. he needs an offramp here that he can walk without being called a quitter by his base. and i think they're frantically searching for it. but by the same token, i think that there is some -- there is some toll on the institution of washington itself, of congress itself. i'm sure democrats are beginning to get a little bit uneasy as

well, because every night the news has led with stories like the one doug spoke of. everyone knows people in their community. i was in the airport today and saw the poor beleaguered tsa people who haven't been paid, and the pressure is mounting. i think democrats are in a better position. trump is in a terrible position. both of them probably could use an exit strategy for this drama. >> what happens if president trump does show up on tuesday evening? is that even a possibility? would speaker pelosi literally turn the president away from the capitol? >> he might try to do an outdoor event by the capitol for all we know. he might force people to try to tell him he can't enter the building. he's going to do something. donald trump i doubt is going to try to just do a read texts off a teleprompter from the oval office and beignet works to cover this. but i guess he'll try to use it to rally the american people to say, hey, this is the first state of the union delivered in ohio, or, you know, arizona or

something like that. i think in movement, donald trump has his best chance right now, not just to be sequestered in the white house while the doors of congress have been locked. >> doug brinkley, david axelrod, thanks very much. >> good to be with you. >> a lot more to talk about tonight, including michael cohen backing away from testifying to congress and the key questions surrounding that question, did the comments from the president of the united states loudly and clearly scare him out of it? sam donaldson joins me and tells me what he sees when he looks at the white house today. "anderson cooper 360" brought to you by the 2019 lincoln nautilus. [indistinct conversation] [friend] i've never seen that before. ♪ ♪

i have... ♪ i have... with advil liqui-gels, what stiff joints? what bad back? advil is... relief that's fast. strength that lasts. you'll ask... what pain? with advil liqui-gels. (ba♪y crying) ♪hold on, i'm comin' ♪hold on, i'm comin' ♪hold on don't you worry,♪ ♪i'm comin' ♪here we come, hold on♪ ♪we're about to save you i'm comin', yeah♪ ♪hold on don't you worry,♪ ♪i'm comin'

okay heryeah!he deal. you're unbelievable. oh, that was a good time. turn up your swagger game with one a day gummies. one serving... ...once a day... ...with nutrients that support 6 vital functions... ...and one healthy you. that's the power of one a day. we're all under one roof now. congratulations. thank you.

how many kids? my two. his three. along with two dogs and jake, our new parrot. that is quite the family. quite a lot of colleges to pay for though. a lot of colleges. you get any financial advice? yeah, but i'm pretty sure it's the same plan they sold me before. well your situation's totally changed now. right, right. how 'bout a plan that works for 5 kids, 2 dogs and jake over here? that would be great. that would be great. that okay with you, jake? get a portfolio that works for you now and as your needs change from td ameritrade investment management.

♪now i'm gonna tell my momma ♪that i'm a traveller transitions™ light under control™ transitions™ presents four new colors style colors by transitions™ the man everyone's waiting to hear from, michael cohen said today he is out. the president's former lawyer and fixer canceled his testimony to congress and cited ongoing threats to his family as the reason. threats he says from the president of the united states and the president's tv lawyer rudy giuliani.

so let that sink in for a second, and while you do, i want you to read a portion of the united states criminal code, title 18, section 1512. whoever uses intimidation, threatens, or corruptly per suedes another person or attempts to do so or engages in misleading conduct towards another person with intent to influence, delay or prevent the testimony of any person in an official proceeding, also quoting again, whoever intentionally harasses another person and thereby hinders, delays, prevent s or dissuedes any person from testifying, that is witness tampering. with that in mind, here is some of what the president has been saying. >> and in order to get a his sentence reduced, he says i have an idea. i'll give you some information on the president. well, there is no information, but he should give information maybe on his father-in-law, because that's the one that

people want to look at, because where does that money, that's the money in the family. and i guess he didn't want to talk about his father. he is trying to get his sentence reduced. so it's pretty sad. you know, it's weak, and it's very sad to watch a thing like that. i couldn't care less. >> what is his father-in-law's name? >> i don't know. but you'll find out and you'll look into it. >> i will. >> because nobody knows what what's going on over there. >> judge janine is going to look into it. that's the nation's chief executive who article 2 of the constitution shall, and i quote take care that the laws are faithfully executed, calling on law enforcement to relegate a potential witness against him, and doing it more than once. >> let me tell you the other thing. his father-in-law is a very rich guy, i hear. his father-in-law i thought was the guy that was the primary focus. well, what did he do? did he make a deal to keep his father-in-law out? did he make a deal to keep his wife, who supposedly -- maybe i'm wrong, but you can check it.

did he make a deal to keep his wife out of trouble? >> still waiting on judge janine to check it. he is also tweeting about it, quoting a negative report on cohen and adding this, lying to reduce his jail time. watch father-in-law. now for starters, we should say that cohen's father-in-law, fema schusterman once plead guilty to a financial crime relating to his taxi business, and that was that years a was that years ago. is he saying he ought to be? who knows. whatever the case, according to legal experts could very well run afoul of that witness tampering criminal code that we just read. one legal expert, if he could be called that said hey, no problem. >> so it's okay to go after the father-in-law? >> of course it is. if the father-in-law is a criminal and the southern district of new york in the plea wanted him to go to jail and said he's lying, they don't buy the special counsel's approach. they say he's lying because he's

holding back information that is far more damaging than the lies that he's sharing with them now. what's that information about? it's about his father-in-law. we talked about ukrainians. his father-in-law is a ukrainian. his father-in-law -- has millions and millions. it comes from the ukraine. the reason that's important is he may have ties to something called organized crime. when somebody testifies against your client, you go out and you look at what's wrong with them. why are they doing it if they're not telling the truth? he's not -- he's doing it because he's afraid to testify against his father-in-law because the repercussions for that will be far worse than the repercussions for lying here. >> i'm not sure what that was about. it doesn't sound nice, does it? anyway, when giuliani and the president aren't seemingly reminding michael cohen of the consequences of testifying, the president is openly quoting and praising someone who is not cooperating, and i'm reading from the tweet. i will never testify against

trump. this statement was recently made by roger stone, essentially saying that he will not be force bade rogue and out of control prosecutor to make up lies and stories about president trump. nice to know that some people have guts. keeping them honest, none of this is even remotely normal. cnn's contributor and former white house counsel john dean could only recall one other similar incident, his old boss telling alexander haig that dean who had just testified before congress must be destroyed. president nixon never said it in public or anything like that, nor has any president before or since, none. nixon was caught on tape, and witness tampering became part of the articles of impeachment against him passed by the house judiciary committee in july of 1974. president trump, whether he is committing a crime or not, whether it's an impeachable offense or not is doing what he is doing in plain sight and seems to have worked. the house oversight committee is seeking michael cohen's testimony. so the question now is what will that committee do next? joining us now is a committee member, congressman gerald connolly, democrat of virginia.

congressman, thanks for being with us. >> good to be with you, anderson. >> to blame for michael cohen cancelling his appearance before your committee, or it is more complicate than that? >> i think clearly there is a concerted effort from the white house led by mr. trump and his hired gun rudy giuliani to not only discredit this witness, but to by insinuation and no proof, bring even more attention to the cohen family and to thereby to intimidate mr. cohen and discard his testimony. and it worked. my understanding is the family of mr. cohen is very upset and concerned by the climate, the toxic climate trump has created for mr. cohen and discouraged him strongly from testifying in open session. >> yeah, the irony is you have

rudy giuliani bringing up the idea that the father-in-law may be involved in organized crime. and, again, he is working for donald trump, you know, who knows a thing or two about new york real estate. do you believe that the president or rudy giuliani, that they've actually engaged in witness tampering? that's obviously something specific and legal. >> if they haven't crossed that line, they've come perilously close. and their behavior, ironically, when they're talking about the mob, looks a lot like how mob behavior looks like. and it's a shameful moment when the presidency of the united states. >> congressman connelly, if you would just stay with us, i'm joined by jeff toobin and gloria borger and dana bash. >> should mueller investigate this, should he add this to the things he is investigating? >> jeff, i think a lot of what we're concerned about has actually happened in front of

our own eyes. for example, obstruction of justice. and yeah, they went on television and did this. and it's had an impact, and i think it is absolutely worthy of examination by the special prosecutor before he completes his work. >> does it make it less of a crime that someone does it in public as opposed to in secret? >> no. it's just maybe a little more clever because a lot of us can't see what's in front of us. it's almost like -- it's almost like that story of the king with no clothes. it's happening in front of you, so you don't see it. but hopefully mr. mueller does see it. >> do democrats on the committee want to subpoena him now? >> yeah. >> do they think that this is important enough and would set a bad enough precedent for them as you take over the congress and you want the talk to whistle-blowers, et cetera, is a subpoena in the offing right now? >> i think it's highly likely, and i personally do support issuing a subpoena to compel the

testimony. we got to remember, mr. cohen was a voluntary witness. in fact, he chose our committee, and that ven you to testify. he was not at all compelled. and his testimony would be in open and under oath. this new threat has given him second thoughts, and his lawyer sect thoughts. so i think we need to compel the testimony while providing him lots of security. but his story needs to be told. the public needs to hear the whole story with some carve-outs in terms of what's going on with mr. mueller, but they haven't heard that so far. i think -- i think you're seeing fear coming out of mr. trump and his white house because they know how much mr. cohen knows and they know how important his relationship was with the trump organization. >> congressman, what can you do to ease michael cohen's concerns about these threats? is there something that you can say? is there something -- a letter that you can write to anything?

is there anything you can actually do as members of this committee who want to compel him to come and tell his story? >> dana, i think it's a very reasonable question, but on the other hand, it doesn't lend itself to an easy answer. we're not on the security business. we're members of congress trying to do our job and provide oversight. we have a witness who says i have reason to fear. we witnessed the same thing you just showed in terms of mr. trump and mr. giuliani seemingly deliberately instilling that fear and stoking those fires of resentment toward this witness. so we've got to make sure he has full protection when he is on the hill. >> do you think his fear is physical safety or do you think his fear is prosecution of his family? >> it's probably both. my understanding today is his family had real reason for physical fear. >> i see. >> but given the toxic social media environment in which we live. >> do you know, i mean had you

planned -- i don't know if you kind of organized what his testimony was going to be, but do you know what the scope of it was going to be able to be? was he going to be able to talk about things related to russia, things that he had discussed with mueller or the southern district? or were your staffers going to have a chance to essentially preinterview him so that when it was actually public testimony, it could be much more focussed? >> probably yes to the latter. the rules of engagement with mr. mueller had not yet been defined. my understanding is we made overtures, the committee staff, to the mueller organization. we have not had a definitive response from mr. mueller. and that's a work in progress. but clearly, there will be some boundaries, and we will respect them. because we don't want to jeopardize the criminal investigation. >> yeah, congressman, i appreciate your time. thank you. >> my great pleasure. thank you for having me. >> everyone else is going to stay was here. we have a lot more to discuss about the conversation, this remarkable day.

later, we'll get veteran white house correspondent sam donaldson's take, a new report kellyanne conway and leaks. our broccoli cheddar is made with aged melted cheddar, simmered broccoli, and no artificial flavors. enjoy 100% clean soup today. panera. food as it should be. kick off the new year with the new iphone included from t-mobile. the amazing iphone xr is perfect for all those new year, new you selfies. and only t-mobile has unlimited with iphone xr included for just 40 bucks.

so get the iphone you love most from the most loved in wireless. bring your family to t-mobile and get the amazing iphone xr included for just $40 per line.

it's not often you hear the allegation of ongoing threats aimed at the president of the united states and his attorney rudy giuliani concerning congressional testimony from michael cohen. testimony that's now on hold. but as you know, that's exactly what happened today. back now with jeff toobin, dana bash and gloria borger.

you were raising a point if you're threatened by a mobster, you can go into witness protection. >> exactly. that's what happens. that's why the witness protection program exists because bad guys make threats against witnesses and their families. what makes this situation in many ways worse is that the guy making the threat is in charge of the witness protection program and the justice department and the fbi. so donald trump, you know, is saying why don't they investigate the father-in-law. well, whose in charge of that? he is. it is the most clear abuse of power that you can imagine. and, you know, we've become so inured to this. it's oh, it's just trump talking. but this is not how the system is supposed to work. >> but as we've been saying all day, this did work. rudy giuliani and donald trump scared michael cohen enough one way or another to get him to back off, at least for now. >> which makes it even worse.

>> fearful of his family being prosecuted? >> i think he is fearful of his family. he is fearful that he will be in jail and not be able to protect his family, that he, according to the people i talked to who are close to him. and the more this went on, the more nervous he got. as you heard the congressman say at first he was a really willing person who wanted to come and tell his story to the american people. and now i think he is afraid to do it the question i have and one of the reasons i ask the congressman this, if it's fear of security, that's one thing. he said that is part of it. but if it's fear that his father-in-law is going to be prosecuted, now that it is so out in the open and giuliani and the president were so transparent about you know, wink, wink, nod, nod. it wasn't a wink nod, it was mega phone, maybe the father-in-law is something going on. you would think it essentially protects him because what u.s.

attorney or prosecutor is going to then oh, thanks, mr. president. i'm going to go after this guy. >> but that's where the norms have disappeared. >> you're right. >> talk about mccarthyism. >> absolutely. >> was there one word what the father-in-law actually did? >> he is ukrainian. >> ukrainian. >> which millions of people are guilty. >> and he has been prosecuted before. so therefore he is guilty of everything. >> but it's like something -- i hate comparing stuff to movies, but it is like something out of a moe where they're look at the father-in-law. it's like we're living in one of the -- i don't want to denigrate any country, but like one of the stands. we're living in this place that ruled by a little ruling family. >> to further explain michael cohen's dilemma, he is going to jail in march. >> right. >> just a few weeks from now. and it is true. you can be subpoenaed out of jail and forced to testify even

though you're incarcerated. it does raise the question of how he's going to deal with his family because he is not available. >> i still think that because this is all out in the open, because the cohen legal team and his family obviously put the brakes on this and shined a light on exactly what giuliani was trying to do and what the president was trying to do, perhaps there is a better chance now that he will go and testify, because it is now so obvious, so talked about what is going on. >> and if he does testify, don't forget, the republicans are not going to go easy on him either. everything that donald trump is talking about you can be sure will come out in talking points from some republicans on that committee. and it won't be easy for him. it will not be easy for him. and he knows it. >> nor should it be. >> right. >> he is convicted felon. he should be cross-examined by the republicans, but he shouldn't be threatened. >> exactly. >> out of testifying in the first place. >> exactly. and that is exactly what has occurred in broad daylight.

>> is this witness tampering? >> well, i mean, you know, it sure looks that way. the -- people who are under investigation certainly have the right to say the accuser is a liar, is a terrible person, and there is nothing wrong with that. that's perfectly appropriate defense. what makes this different is that the person making those statements is a person with the power to prosecute those family members. >> but that's what i was saying. now that it's out in the open, i feel like it's so much harder, even though it is his purview and it is his job and those people work for him, harder to see it through. because everybody is going to know what's going on. >> those are two separate questions. one is whether the family will actually be prosecuted. >> right. >> the other question is he intimidating cohen out of, and that's the crime. the crime is intimidating someone out. >> but your question is very

obvious what he's doing. >> your question is would the attorney general force someone to take a look into this? and when barr was testifying, what he says was, you know, there is no problem with the president asking us to look into something. but there is a question to dana's point about whether we would perceive. >> so much for the white house ever saying we want everybody to cooperate. >> oh my god, that was so 2017. that wasn't even 2018. >> that was like two months. >> that was like three lawyers ago. >> it was three lawyers ago. so do you think he would be subpoenaed? connelly was saying he'd like him to be. >> i think he will be. >> what about testifying behind closed doors. would that be worse or would that be better? >> the committee was already planning on examining him behind closed doors. but oversight, connelly's committee was supposed to testify, is supposed to have him testify in public. i suppose that is one way you could address the problem. i mean, don't kid yourself.

the democrats want this to be a spectacle too. >> also made the point that in the best hearings, they usually preinterview, the staff preinterviews people so that once the hearing is public, they don't have to go in this meandering journey. they can just zoom in. >> correct. and one of the many questions outstanding is if he agrees to testify, will he agree to that sort of preparation. now he will be conveniently located in federal custody, so they'll know how to find him. but the question is will he agree while he's in custody to meet with staff and go over what he's going to say. and of course another issue that remains outstanding, and connelly said this had not been resolved either is how much will mueller object to certain areas being offlimits to testifying and the southern district too as far as i understand it is an unresolved issue. >> jeff, dana, gloria, much appreciated it. ahead, an excerpt from a new

book from a former trump aide who says some pretty extraordinary things about kellyanne conway. going to get some perspective from legendary journalist sam donaldson, next. with expedia, i saved when i added a hotel to our flight. so even when she grows up, she'll never outgrow the memory of our adventure. unlock savings when you add select hotels to your existing trip. only with expedia. psoriasis or psoriatic arthritis, little things can be a big deal. that's why there's otezla. otezla is not an injection or a cream. it's a pill that treats differently. for psoriasis, 75% clearer skin is achievable, with reduced redness, thickness, and scaliness of plaques. for psoriatic arthritis,

otezla is proven to reduce joint swelling, tenderness, and pain. and the otezla prescribing information has no requirement for routine lab monitoring. don't use if you're allergic to otezla. it may cause severe diarrhea, nausea, or vomiting. otezla is associated with an increased risk of depression. tell your doctor if you have a history of depression or suicidal thoughts, or if these feelings develop. some people taking otezla reported weight loss. your doctor should monitor your weight and may stop treatment. upper respiratory tract infection and headache may occur. tell your doctor about your medicines and if you're pregnant or planning to be. otezla. show more of you. ♪ [ telephone ringing ] -whoa.

[ indistinct talking ] -deductible? -definitely speaking insurance. -additional interest on umbrella policy? -can you translate? -damage minimization of civil commotion. -when insurance needs translating, get answers in plain english at progressiveanswers.com. ♪ -he wants you to sign karen's birthday card. it's a high honor. -he wants you to sign karen's birthday card.

your favorite restaurants now it doesn't matter dash. where you are. ♪ it doesn't matter what you're hungry for. it doesn't even matter how many you are. ♪ restaurants come to you. delicious at your door. download doordash. first order, $1 delivery fee. a cartoon villain brought to life. that's how a former trump aide describes kellyanne conway in a new look at the infighting, the leaking, and the gossiping that have been part of the fabric of the trump white house. the former aide whose name is

cliff simms wrote about all of it in a book that comes out next week called "team of vipers: my 500 extraordinary days in the white house." "vanity fair" has published an excerpt. simms writes about one particular day he was writing an excerpt on her laptop. for 20 minutes he could see the text conversations conway was having with at least half a dozen reporters from all over the place she and the president call fake news, and that she was trashing jared kushner, reince priebus, steve kornacki and sean spicer. simms writes that conway also recounted private conversations she had with the president and talked about him like a child she had to set straight. we reached out to kellyanne conway for reaction for a statement, have not gotten a response. legendary reporter sam donaldson covered the white house for decades. he joins me now. sam, every white house has leaker, as you know better than almost anyone. how often is such a prolific

leaker in such a high level position? >> well, i've not seen anything like kellyanne conway. i mean, she and the president are symbiotic in their relationship. they look in the mirror, they see each other. they're both narcissists. they both want media spotlight on them. they don't mind trashing anyone. she trashed him. morning joe for instance. he trashes people, and they both lie. what more do you want? in a leaker, though, do you want the straight stuff if you're going to publish it? you don't want to pass along something that's not right. so kellyanne has to be very careful. and when she covers herself by saying well, these are alternative facts. no. it's not alternative facts or alternative truth. you can't buy that. >> if president trump hates leaks, as he claims, and kellyanne conway is a serial leaker, i guess, then, why is she still there? either he doesn't believe she is a leaker, or she has some sort of tacit green light to do it,

even if it includes, you know, bashing his son-in-law. >> no, but she leaks good things for him. good things for him. he hates leakers unless they're leaks that he wants. >> right. >> presidents are all kind of alike. the others too. ronald reagan said i'm up to my ea keister in leaks, but he didn't mind if the leak served the purpose of the administration. so i think that's okay. why is she still there? he likes her. an as i say, they have a relationship that's, well, mongoose and cobra. >> mongoose and cobra. just in terms of where we are with this shutdown and the state of the union, you covered reagan, speaker o'neill, clinton, speaker gingrich. this relationship between the president and speaker pelosi, it really seems to be in a league of its own. >> i think it is. i mean, he is used to having his way, the president. he is used to ruling over people. he is used to demanding things and getting them, and he has now met big tommy d'alesandro's

daughter. big tommy was the last big city mayor of baltimore. he had an eighth grade education, but he's taught his daughter nancy and his other children about politics, and she is a maid of steel. and she is not going to give up. and so far she has won this fight. now we'll see what the president does. >> that would seem crazy. >> he's not that foolish. >> the guards -- what would a guard do when they can't admit people who are not admitted by the house of representatives in the senate to a joint session. he says i'm coming in. does the guard say, i'm not. no, it's a situation that the great riot in the east room after the elections this fall. when the president created a riot and joined in.

among reporters. we're human. i think. but it's just something that couldn't happen. i don't know what he's going to do. he'll do something. you're right. he'll try to be the spotlight. he has the problem of appealing to people other than the base. the base doesn't care where he goes or what he says. but a lot of other people do and that's important. >> is there any kind of in a statesman like a george mitchell or jim baker who can bridge the gap or at least get the two sides seriously talking, or z that no longer exist in washington? >> if they exist, i'm not familiar. you mention a couple great ones. there are many others who could do that and bridge the gap between republicans and democrats and conservatives and liberals. but the town is so poisonous. we're so poisonous. the american people are at each other's throats and hate each other instead of just arguing about politics. i'm not sure there's anyone that could bridge the gap.

the president has to win. he's got to win for two reasons. because he always wins and you can't not and because he's got. to build that wall or maybe a few of his base will say, hey, it's a con man. i've been conned. if he has that. he's lost. >> it's always great to talk to you. >> krit chris cuomo. "prime time" at the top of the hour. eight minutes from now. what are you working on? >> i did a show with sam donaldson. there was a segment called stump sam. he never got stumped. when he said mono-goose and cobra. it's true. there he is. nobody got a hat. mongoose, what was the name of the famous mongoose and cobra that fought. in the famous child's cartoon. and what was the snake's name?

>> three letters. >> nag. >> i did not know that. >> do i get a bonus? >> i expect it. you're our best. you rise to the occasion once more. we'll try to take your lead. we'll get inside the intrigue and call out o why the shutdown has gotten so bad. the head of the air traffic controllers union wants to come on the show to tell people how concerned he is. we both know that's very rare. we're giving them time to do that. we'll look at how legitimate to threat to cohen's safety is. and i believe there's something that could unite washington. it's going on right now. it involves your favorite thing, football. >> really? >> they haven't seen those pictures of you playing linebacker. i have.

>> we're on the old pig skin. >> yes, sir. >> thanks very much. up next, more kellyanne conway, she's asked a simple question about the overwhelming majority of people. the word that followed it is nearly shakespearen. we're going to play if for you next. ♪[upbeat music]

♪now i'm gonna tell my momma ♪that i'm a traveller transitions™ light under control™ transitions™ presents four new colors style colors by transitions™ transitions™ presents four new colors so lionel, what does 24/5 mean to you?rade well, it means i can trade after the market closes. it's true. so all... evening long. ooh, so close. yes, but also all... night through its entirety. come on, all... the time from sunset to sunrise.

right. but you can trade... from, from... from darkness to light. ♪ you're not gonna say it are you? turn up your swagger game with one a day gummies. one serving... ...once a day... ...with nutrients that support 6 vital functions... ...and one healthy you. that's the power of one a day. but they can be welreally expensive. a puppy, so to save money i just found them a possum. dad, i think he's dead. probably just playin' possum. there he is. there's an easier way to save. geico. fifteen minutes could save you fifteen percent or more on car insurance.

now it's about the time we sometimes end the program with something we call the ridiculist. usually takes explaining and contest. humor thrown this. every once in a while, but every once in awhile, every once in a super blood wolf moon, the ridiculist just writes itself. tonight is that night. 71% say the border wall is not worth the government shutdown, a pretty clear signal. abbi phillip tried to ask

kellyanne conway about such poll and with that, we invite you to behold the self-writing ridiculist. >> the new poll out showing 71% of -- >> do you have the poll question? i just want to see the question. >> the question was is the wall worth the government shutdown? >> so why would that be the question? >> what is the president -- >> i'm asking why you're still saying wall when the president said you can call it whatever you want. >> he call it is a wall himself. >> i was in the situation room and he said to leader schumer that -- it's a great slogan. build a wall and crime will fall. >> why can't we call it a wall? >> steel slat barrier, physical barrier, anything. in other words, we need a physical barrier that you can't crawl under, climb over, drive through or walk around. that's why i have doors in my house. i assume you do also.

and they have locks. in other words, it's to protect people on the inside. i don't understand why it's so difficult to get. beyond what you all want to make a four-letter word wall when the president said to chuck schumer and since publicly call it what you want to call it. but let's secure our border. >> i never called it a wall. why did you call it a wall? who is calling it a wall? day ever say a wall? i didn't say a wall. i don't think i ever said a wall. time to say bye. or so long. or see you later. or call it whatever you want. just keep talking. if you don't want to address the topic at hand, in other words, cuomo "prime time" starts now. >> very well done, anderson. that did write itself. i am chris cuomo. welcome to "prime time". now the president has create ed a real crisis. he's created a real one. a warning from five former