jane, jane, we can't wait to meet you. congratulations. a wonderful family. i'm wolf blitzer in "the situation room." erin burnett "outfront" starts right now. "outfront" next, meddling in a federal investigation. president trump reportedly trying to get a political supporter to oversee the investigation into michael cohen. is this obstruction of justice? plus, the trump campaign calling democrats socialists. is it true? and he spent more than $100 million of his own money toward impeaching trump. tom styey r is not done tonight. let's go "outfront." good evening. i'm erin burnett. "outfront" tonight, cheating the system. new evidence that president trump may have obstructed justice and this in a whole new way. let me explain. "the new york times" reporting that president trump tried to derail the federal investigation into his former mixer, michael

cohen. how? by pressuring then-acting attorney general matt whitaker to put a trump supporter and former transition adviser in charge of it. someone who trump may have thought would have kept him in the clear. let's be clear, this is an explosive charge. and the president knows it. tonight, moving quickly to deny the charge. >> did you ask acting attorney general mad tthew whitaker to change the investigation into michael cohen? >> no, not at all. i don't know who gave you that. more fake news. there's a lot of fake news out there. >> quite a pause there, wasn't it? and then the old fake news excuse. just to be clear about this, the u.s. attorney that trump purportedly wanted in charge of the cohen case is a guy named geoffrey berman. he is a trump supporter. he donated $5,400 to the trump campaign. he served in the trump

transition. and even over at fox news, friend of the president says that if these charges are true, that trump tried to put berman in charge of the cohen investigation, this is bad. >> would that be obstruction? >> yes. it -- well, it would be attempted obstruction. >> attempted obstruction. according to the "times," there's no evidence that whitaker actually went through with this because berman actually had already recused himself from the cohen investigation. but the thing is, whitaker knows being pressured by the president of the united states to put a supporter of his in charge of a criminal case that may involve the president is a huge problem. but under oath, whitaker denied he'd ever been pressured by trump to interfere with an investigation. here he is in his own words. >> at no time has the white house asked for, nor have i provided any promises or commitments concerning the special counsel's investigation

or any other investigation. >> tonight, that answer is under scrutiny by house democrats for possible perjury. pamela brown is "outfront" live outside the white house. and pamela, the president knows this is a huge charge. and this would possibly be obstruction in a whole new way. there was that long pause we heard when he was asked about it. and then, of course, he went back to the fake news crutch. he's trying to deny it. >> reporter: yeah. that's right. you heard the question asked to him, and he, after he paused, denied that he ever made this ask of former a.g. matt whitaker to have the u.s. attorney geoffrey berman unrecuse and oversee the cohen probe. now, this denial is in response to this "new york times" reporting today that, in fact, he did make that ask because he viewed berman as an ally. sources tell me and my colleague, laura jarrett, that the president was upset about the cohen probe. his former fixer. and how it implicated him in the payments to two women during the election and did fume to matt whitaker about it over the

phone. the president thought that whitaker should do a better job controlling the investigators in the probe that whitaker oversaw as acting attorney general. and if you read that justice department statement carefully, there isn't a denial that president trump and whitaker discussed the sdny probe. and during recent congressional testimony, whitaker would only say he wouldn't discuss conversations with the president when he was asked whether he did speak to him about the sdny investigation. in contrast, he told the committee he never spoke about the mueller probe to president trump. so you look at the comparison, how he answered those two questions about the mueller probe, saying he never talked about it with trump, compared to sdny saying he's not going to talk about those conversations. this latest reporting, erin, about trump, fits into the pattern where he believes officials in the justice department roles should show loyalty to him and do his bidding. as you'll recall, the president was furious when jeff sessions recused himself from the russia

probe and never got over it. erin? >> he certainly never did. of course, still taking the opportunities to take shots at him now that he's gone. thanks very much, pamela. "outfront" now, i want to go to jack weiss, former federal prosecutor, former democratic member of the los angeles city council. carrie cordero. and david gergen, former presidential adviser to four presidents. jack, if the president pressured his attorney general at the time, matt whitaker, to put a trump supporter, trump donor, trump transition adviser, in charge of the michael cohen criminal case, is that obstruction of justice? >> it is. and i think is because the stakes here, the criminal stakes for trump, are much higher, arguably, than in the mueller case. because here you have michael cohen who knows where all the dirty laundry is, where all the bodies are buried inside trump tower. the trump family. trump business dealings. every crooked land deal. every bit of money laundering they did for russian oligarch who bought a condo in florida. everything the trumps did wrong or may have done wrong before

trump was elected to office, michael cohen has been singing about. and that has trump petrified. that's why if we believe what "the new york times" reported, and i do, because my guess is matthew whitaker told someone at the justice department, hey, trump asked me to do something about berman, what do i do? if it's correct, then i think it's potentially devastating for trump. >> potentially devastating, carrie? >> it certainly is. i mean, look, in terms of his political exposure, i think it is. it's not clear that he would be charged because justice department policy says that he wouldn't actually be charged. but i think this is now the third investigation that has been revealed that he tried to obstruct. the first was the michael flynn case when he asked former director comey if he could make the case go away. the second was the overall russia investigation and we could look to the firing of director comey and a whole host of other activities and pressure

that the president placed on investigators and justice department officials to try to make that investigation go away. then this would be the third investigation if the allegations are true that the president tried to replace the leadership with the goal of making the investigation go away or be limited or be cabined or stay away from any exposure that he may have in it. >> so, you know, david gergen, the "times" also reports as pamela was talking about, the president's desire for loyalty and feeling that everybody around him should be loyal to him. the "times" quotes mr. whitaker saying, this is the quote from the article, i'm sorry, qhe privately told associates part of his role at the justice department, here's the quote from whitaker "jump on a grenade for the president. "david, is that the role of the attorney general? >> it has never been in the past. at least it certainly hasn't been when the government has conducted itself honestly and with integrity. i think here, erin, listen, if

the report is correct, and i'm assuming that it probably is correct because it's a very, very thorough piece. it's got four names on it from "the new york times." i don't think they would go with this kind of story unless they were very confident. but still, people have to come under -- now have to be brought in and testify under oath because what you see happening here with whitaker and with the president is they may be very carefully parsing what happened. let's say the president called and said, matt, would you consider the possibility of berman, just explore it and get back to me? the president could say i never asked. he simply suggested. i never asked. and we have whitaker issued a statement saying he doesn't address the question whether he was asked or even whether he got a call. he simply says i was never pressured. might have been a suggestion.

i was never pressured and made no commitment the. what he said under oath to the house and what he said here publicly. for most americans, that kind of call from the president of the united states would look like an ask. >> yes. this is the -- >> clever lawyers, yeah, if gyo got clever lawyers, say, no, he could say, look, i'm telling the truth, he never asked. >> carrie, what's the standard here for obstruction? i think as david's saying, yes, we all would know getting a call like that especially from someone like donald trump, you know, i've been on a receiving end of a phone call from him once years ago when he wanted me to come over and do something with "the apprentice" taping, the timing of taping and the guy wouldn't give up, right? he wanted something and he wanted something. this is the president of the united states we're talking about now. there's no such thing that just a suggestion that isn't pressuring, is there, when it comes to obstruction? >> the key with obstruction, it is an intent crime so the prosecutors, if an obstruction case were prosecuted, they'd have to show the individual had

corrupt intent. again, the president isn't probably going to be charged with obstruction, given doj policy. it certainly is something that congress should look at from the perspective of these are now three cases that he potentially has tried to obstruct, and those are impeachable offenses. >> jack, obviously, we know we're talking about, right, he ordered robert mueller to be, you know, fired back in 2017. right? there was that. right? there's the possible role in the jim comey firing. and he has said before, jack, that he will get involved if he needs to in these investigations. here he is. >> what's happening is a disgrace. and at some point, i want it to stay out, at some point, if it doesn't straighten out properly, i want them to do their job, i will get involved. >> impeachable, jack? what we're now seeing when you look at the pattern and this latest report?

>> i think it's indictable. i think once he's out of office, he likely will be indicted for this conduct because the statute of limitations on this runs for another five years. look, he's not a subtle guy. whatever he said to matt whitaker, i would be shocked and amazed if it was subtle. what congress needs to do now is get to the bottom of it and when they get to the bottom of it, my suggestion would be this new congress needs to end the practice of having members ask the questions. the democratic congress needs to hire professional prosecutors to put witnesses under oath and under professional examination so you won't end up with this sort of parsing defense that, perhaps, matthew whitaker has based on the clip you saw a few moments ago. >> so, david, one last thing i want to ask you, this article also gets into the president's issue with the truth when it comes to public statements versus reality, which could matter for mueller. the example they give is michael flynn and sean spicer who was then the press secretary. he was supposed to go out and tell everyone what happened.

the white house had said flynn submitted his resignation, it was voluntary. the president didn't want spicer to say that. the reporting is, "say that, mr. trump ordered. was that true, mr. spicer pressed?" trump told, asked for the resignation. "say i asked for his resignation, mr. trump repeated." didn't care what the truth was or sean spicer was in the job of telling the truth to the press. >> right. absolutely. that was a major part of this story. the president basically ordered a false story. a false tale to be told to the press. it's very similar to what happened on the tower meeting when they were in the airplane and he dictated his statement about what happened. and very likely what happened in the last few hours. with "the new york times" story that has broken. this is a pattern we've seen. it's very, very distressing to see it because it shows, underlines the fact that you can't really believe anything.

on face value. there's always another story behind the story. >> it also shows, erin, just -- it also shows that so many of the things the president does in public actually is what's going on behind the scenes. when he appointed matt whitaker as acting attorney general, most justice department veterans were astounded because it was someone who had never been confirmed by the senate when there were a whole host of senate confirmed assistant attorney generals and others who could have been appointed to that position. . it was so unusual that the only reason it looked like he was appointed was to be able to do something improper and now based on this reporting, it looks like that's what the president tried to do. >> all right. well, thank you, all, very much. i'm just remembering that time on air force one right when he was asked if he knew about the payments to stormy daniels and he said, no, quickly. that obviously was false, it was a lie. now there was a long pause today. and i wonder if that pause was his mind wondering, can i do it again? "outfront" next, bernie sanders jumps in the race and the president's quick to use the socialist label. >> the democrat party has never

been more outside of the mainstream. they're becoming the party of socialism. plus, house democrats launching an investigation accusing trump of siding with saudi arabia and its crown prince over top national security officials when it comes to news. what is it with trump and saudi arabia? and the billionaire who made a name for himself by calling for trump's impeachment is now taking on democrats and saying step it up. gether doing important stuff. the hitch? like you, your cells get hungry. feed them... with centrum® micronutrients. restoring your awesome... daily. feed your cells with centrum® micronutrients today.

just as important as what you get out of it? feed your cells with our broccoli cheddar is made with aged melted cheddar, simmered broccoli, and no artificial flavors. enjoy 100% clean soup today. panera. food as it should be. (danny) after a long day of hard work... ...you have to do more work? every day you're nearly fried to a crisp, professionally! can someone turn on the ac?! no? oh right... ...'cause there isn't any. here- (vo) automatically sort your expenses and save over 40 hours a month. without you, we wouldn't have electricity. our hobby would be going to bed early. (vo) you earned it, we're here to make sure you get it. (danny) it's time to get yours! (vo) quickbooks. backing you.

(clapping) every day, visionaries are creating the future. ( ♪ ) so, every day, we put our latest technology and vast expertise to work. ( ♪ ) the united states postal service makes more e-commerce deliveries to homes than anyone else in the country, affordably and on-time. (ringing) ( ♪ ) the future only happens with people who really know how to deliver it.

the future only happens [music playing] jerry has a membership to this gym, but he's not using it. and he has subscriptions to a music service he doesn't listen to and five streaming video services he doesn't watch. this is jerry learning that he's still paying for this stuff he's not using. he's seeing his recurring payments in control tower in the wells fargo mobile app. this is jerry canceling a few things. booyah. this is jerry appreciating the people who made this possible. oh look, there they are. (team member) this is wells fargo. we're finally going on the trip i've been promising. because with expedia, i saved when i added a hotel to our flight. ♪ so even when she outgrows her costume, we'll never outgrow the memory of our adventure together. unlock savings when you add select hotels to your existing trip. only when you book with expedia.

tonight bernie sanders is in. senator sanders officially announcing he's running for president. says he'll win this time because the democratic party is now more like him. >> you may recall that in 2016, many of the ideas that i talked about, medicare for all, raising the minimum wage to $15 an hour, making public colleges and universities tuition-fleree. all those ideas, people said, bernie, they're so radical, they're extreme, american people won't accept those ideas. you know what's happened in over three years? all of those ideas and many more are now part of the political mainstream. >> the trump campaign seizing on this saying, "bernie sanders has already run the debate in the democrat primary because every candidate is embracing his brand of socialism." "outfront" now, mia love, former republican representative from utah and bob reish, former labor

secretary under president clinton. also the author of "the common good." thank you, both. mia, is the trump campaign right? democrats, socialists, same thing? >> well, i think -- well, we have to make -- they have to try and stay away from that. if that's what they want to do. let's remind people what socialism actually is. socialism is an economic system in which the ways of making a living, whether it's working through a factory, office, are actually owned by society and not by personal or private individuals. so if they're going to -- if they're going to move away from socialism, they need to talk about that. if they're going to move toward free market system, they have to talk about that also because they will be painted as socialists or socialism type -- implementing socialism-type policies if they don't make that very clear. >> and robert, they -- trump is trying to do that. he's trying to brand them with just that. here he is. >> to those who would try to impose socialism on the united states, we, again, deliver a very simple message.

america will never be a socialist country. the democrat party has never been more outside of the mainstream. they're becoming the party of socialism. we are alarmed by the new calls to adopt socialism in our country. >> he clearly thinks, bob, of making it -- calling it -- using the word is scary and going to upset people. >> well, this is not a new republican tactic, erin. in 1935, republicans accused franklin d. roosevelt of being a socialist for proposing national security. in 1965, republicans s accused lyndon johnson of being a socialist for proposing medicare. many republicans accused barack obama proposing the affordable care act. this is a label republicans have used for at least 80 years every time the democrats propose

something that turns out to be remarkably popular and durable. >> so -- >> but i don't see anybody moving away from that. i don't see any of the democrat candidates moving away from that title and that's all i'm saying is that, you know, i remember the days of just listening to people saying, look, free markets have taken people out of poverty. more people out of poverty than any other economic system in the history of the world. i don't see anybody talking about that. what they are talking about are socialist policies which is going to make it a lot easier for them to paint them as socialists. >> no, i think the -- 70% of americans right now are in favor of medicare for all by four different polls. two-thirds of americans, right now, are in favor of free college tuition at public universities. you go down the list. we have over 50% of americans want a $15 minimum wage. these policies are not -- call them whatever you want to call them, they are fair. people believe in them. i don't think that the labels

mean anything. >> i will tell you, robert, though, that they cost money. you tell people medicare for all, until, guess what, you're going to lose your private insurer possibly. free college for all isn't free, someone has to pay for it via taxes. >> look, paying for things complicates the whole issue a little bit. >> well, it does. i think -- >> say all of these things -- >> i think democrats do need to say we're pragmatic and we got to cut the bloated military spending and got to -- that $1.9 trillion tax cut for big corporations and the wealthy, we've got to repeal that. we can't afford that. with we're going to put that money instead into education and health care. >> so can i just -- >> one second. >> in terms of people running away from the label, some of them have. let me just play elizabeth warren and kamala harris. here they are. >> i am a capitalist. come on. i believe in markets. >> i will tell you, i am not a democratic socialist. >> all right. so they're running away from it, mia. >> okay. okay. but -- >> then you hear things -- okay.

go i a hehead. >> it's one thing to say those things. another thing to say how you're going to implement some of these policies that are actually taking away -- how do you pay for the free college? how do you pay? it sounds great. how do you pay for that? >> i just mentioned -- >> how do you pay for medicare for all? >> i mentioned a lot of ways to pay for it. i just mentioned several ways of paying for it. also let -- >> remember. hang on a second. let me finish. >> excuse any. >> let me finish. let me just finish because you have to remember that i am a product of my father who came to this country with absolutely nothing and he had three jobs in order to make ends meet. the people who actually gave him the jobs are people that are said they're not paid enough or they're not taxing people enough. what i'm afraid of is there's going to be a point where you tax somebody so much that the people that don't end up getting the jobs that they need are the ones that really want to help their families. the ones that need another leg up. another -- the ones that want to go from the lowest common demom nader up to the middle class and beyond. if they choose.

those are the people that are going to get hurt. >> mia, nobody is talking about -- democrats i know are not talking about increasing taxes on the middle class or the poor. they're talk bing about increasing taxes on the very wealthy. doing exactly the opposite that donald trump and the republicans have done in terms of that $1.9 trillion tax cut. >> the tacts -- >> the other people, i want to get in very, very quickly, if i can, medicare for all is actually -- it's shown -- a number of studies have shown it's cheaper than our current for-profit private medicare system that tries to avoid sick people. it's the most expensive per capita in the world. and it actually, americans' living standards and length of time that we are alive, it turns out, is shorter than many other advanced industrial countries. everybody else has a -- has a system that looks like medicare for all. a single-payer system. it's crazy we don't. >> all right. i'm going to hit pause there. a lot more to talk about. i didn't get to play it. i'll leave everyone with this thought. amy klobuchar running for the

democratic nomination. if i was a genie, give it to everyone, i would. on free college. she says it's not affordable. conversation to be continued. next, did the trump administration go against the advice of top national security officials, try to give saudi arabia nuclear technology? plus billionaire businessman tom steyer is my guest, spent millions trying to impeach president trump and now he's targeting democrats who he says don't have the courage to do it. don't get mad. get e*trade, dawg.

heyi'm craving somethingkin! we're missing. the ceramides in cerave. they help restore my natural barrier, so i can lock in moisture... and keep us protected. we've got to have each other's backs... and fronts. cerave. what your skin craves. when cravings hit, hit back. choose glucerna, with slow release carbs to help manage blood sugar, and start making everyday progress. glucerna. to be nobody but yourself in a world which is doing it's best

to make you everybody else... ♪ ♪ means to fight the hardest battle, which any human being can fight and never stop. does this sound dismal? it isn't. ♪ ♪ it's the most wonderful life on earth. ♪ ♪

want more from your entejust say teach me more. into your xfinice remoteh. to discover all sorts of tips and tricks in x1. can i find my wifi password? just ask. [ ding ] show me my wifi password. hey now! [ ding ] you can even troubleshoot, learn new voice commands and much more. clean my daughter's room. [ ding ] oh, it won't do that. welp, someone should. just say "teach me more" into your voice remote and see how you can have an even better x1 experience. simple. easy. awesome. new tonight, whistle-blowers pointing the finger at president trump for helping saudi arabia go nuclear. democrats launching an investigation based on the

report that you see here. it details claims from multiple whistle-blowers saying team trump ignored repeated warnings from top national security officials. warnings saying not to provide saudi arabia with nuclear technology. i want to be clear that saudi arabia is not a nuclear country, right? they're not in the nuclear club. so enabling them down that path is a big, big deal. and despite the warnings of the top security officials, according to the whistle-blowers, trump plowed ahead, anyway. and the report concludes that those efforts may still be ongoing today. now the saudi nuclear plan, we learn here, was pushed by trump's former national security adviser michael flynn and the company at the center of it was founded by former american generals. it's a plan that one current official says was, quote, a scheme for these generals to make some money. so why didn't president trump stop it? i mean, what is it about saudi arabia and its crown prince and trump? saudi arabia was the first country that donald trump visited as president. >> hundreds of billions of dollars of investments into the

united states and jobs, jobs, jobs. so i would like to thank all of the people of saudi arabia. >> trump's sycophancy toward saudi arabia of course reaching new heights as he stands in open defiance of an american congressional deadline to officially state whether the odd saudi crown prince mohammed bin salman was behind the murder of "washington post" journalist jamal khashoggi. a conclusion that trump's own cia reached pretty much immediately. this is not hard. except for trump who has said mbs is a friend. for him, this is hard. >> i hate the crime. i hate what's done. i hate the cover-up. and i will tell you this, the crown prince hates it more than i do, and they have vehemently denied it. >> again, what is it about trump and saudi arabia? kara, you know, as we go through this report, how concerned were security officials about this plan to provide this technology

to saudi arabia, this nuclear technology? >> i mean, erin, they were worried. they were so worried that they at least half a dozen times based on the findings in the report. the national security council staff, they were worrieded about a couple things. they said they were worried about conflicts of interest that would exist because of the private company founded by the general the and michael flynn who had worked for one of the subsidiaries of that company. they were worried about the conflicts that could be illegal if making money off the administration. they w requires and has limitations on how much the u.s. can export technology to a foreign country without the approval of congress. the nse staffers raised these concerns to their ethics folks internally and then also to the legal department. then they brought them even to the top lawyer on the national security council. he told them to stop working on the plan. but they didn't. michael flynn and his aides continue to push for this plan.

again, these concerns were raised. michael flynn's team was wanting to get this private plan before donald trump, before he met with saudi officials. that was the goal and these internal -- the staffers said, hold on a minute, this doesn't make sense. they brought it, again, to the top lawyer. the lawyer said to stop working on it then after michael flynn was fired, top aides at the security council were continuing to push this plan. and all we know really from this report is the first three months of the administration, but it's these concerns that were raised by the whistle-blowers covering just that beginning period that have cummings' committee very concerned and want to get to the bottom of whether the u.s. and the administration is working in the best interest of u.s. national security or in the interest of lining the pockets of those that were close to the administration, erin. >> all right, thank you very much, kara. i want to go now to the chairman of the house armed services committee, democratic congressman adam smith. congressman, i appreciate your time. so, you know, congressman, michael flynn and other top white house officials were pushing this plan, right, to

transfer this nuclear technology to saudi arabia. you know, you hear they're saying there were at least half a dozen times that it was raised that this at best could be inappropriate and unethical, at worst, illegal. do you have any concern there were quid pro quos here? >> absolutely. i mean, this is the big problem with president trump having the business interests that he continues to have and not disclosing them. there's no transparency. we know that trump industries, the companies, they're done business with saudi arabia. they've gotten money from saudi arabia. just like they've gotten money from russian interests as well as part of their private industry. we don't know the details. when something like this comes up, you have to ask yourself the question, is the president looking after the interests of the united states or looking after his own personal business interests? then you mix in michael flynn and all these others who have been getting paid. michael flynn was paid, that's part of the reason he's going to jail, by sovereign funds from -- by the russian government, i believe by the turkey government as well. is it the u.s. interests or is

it the business interests of donald trump and the people around him? and we don't moe. >> we don't know. of course, when you talk about it impacting policy, talk about transferring technology, also talking about this whole situation, you know, with this horrible dismemberment of american journalist jamal khashoggi. >> right. >> the president has deep ties to saudi arabia. this has been going on for a long time. he visited, his first trip as president, as i mentioned, $110 billion arms deal with the ku b country announced at that time. jared kushner apparently hangs out with the crown prince until 4:00 in the morning once. talks to him regularly on a first-name business. the murder of jamal khashoggi, the president refuses -- he won't hand over -- won't say that it was done at the direction of the saudi crown prince though his own intelligence has said it. in fact, he takes the crown prince's side publicly repeatedly like this. >> i spoke with the crown prince yesterday, and he strongly said

that he had nothing to do with this. they deny it. they deny it every way you can imagine. i hate the crime. i hate what's done. i hate the cover-up. and i will tell you this, the crown prince hates it more than i do, and they have vehemently denied it. >> how much looking into does this warrant? i mean, obviously -- >> a great deal. >> -- we talked so much about russia. sorry. go ahead. >> particularly when you're talking about the murder of khashoggi, i mean, it's slam dunk as far as the intelligence community is concerned. saudi arabia obviously did it. they fully believe that mbs was involved. so ignoring that is just wrong. and, again, points up to the conflict. now, i will point out one fact that you ought to know. we have negotiated. we've negotiated with the united arab emirates on a similar deal regarding nuclear power. >> yes. >> and the agreement is, you know, they don't get to generate anything. the nuclear material has to come in from the outside. has to be disposed.

>> right. >> so this type of an agreement can be negotiated with, as we did with the uae, with saudi arabia. but here, there's such a conflict. when you hear the president dismissing the obvious facts of what saudi arabia has done, it gives considerable concern. >> right. of course, there's that nuclear power facility near abu dhabi. i want to ask you about the president declaring a national emergency to secure funding for the wall, chairman. i know this is very important to you. 16 states have now sued to stop it. the president today says, hey, i'm not worried about it at all. here he is. >> i think in the end, we're going to be very successful with the lawsuit. so it was filed. it was filed in the ninth circuit. and i actually think we might do very well even in the ninth circuit because it's an open and closed case. >> the ninth circuit has ruled in his favor recently regarding the wall. is he right, this is open and closed? >> no, it's absolutely not. if reports are to be believed, his own lawyers have told him

that he's wrong on this. look, tloohere's a degree of nuance. first of all you can argue over whether or not this is actually an emergency. the real part of this that's clearly illegal, the national emergency statute from 1976 does give the president broad authority to declare an emergency, but when he's going to take money from other agencies, it is very prescriptive about where that money has to go. and the money that he wants to take out of dod, i mean, let's not forget for the moment that even if he could do this, it's still a terrible idea. it is not our top national security priority to build a wall at our southern border that people will go under and over, anyway. taking money out of the department of defense for this purpose makes us less safe. but it's also illegal because the law says that you can only use money from the military construction budget to build something that is going to provide protection for u.s. armed forces. and president trump has made it clear, this wall is to stop people coming across the border

and threatening the country. it has nothing to do with force protection within the military. and, therefore, i think the slam dunk goes the other way. this is clearly an illegal action. >> all right. chairman, thank you very much. >> thank you. and next, tom steyer, the billionaire businessman who's been leading the call for trump's impeachment, is now targeting specific democratic members of congress. steyer is "outfront." and elizabeth warren's newest message to voters. >> for those of you who may leave here and think, oh, my gosh, i must be turning into a nerd. >> is nerding out the answer to beating trump?

run with us on a john deere 1 series tractor. beacuse changing your attachments, should be as easy as... what about this? changing your plans. yeah. run with us. search "john deere 1 series" for more. yeah. run with us. whooo! want to take your next vacation to new heights? tripadvisor now lets you book over a hundred thousand tours, attractions, and experiences in destinations around the world! like new york! from bus tours, to breathtaking adventures, tripadvisor makes it easy to find and book amazing things to do. and you can cancel most bookings up to 24 hours in advance for a full refund. so you can make your next trip... monumental! read reviews check hotel prices book things to do tripadvisor

now audible members get free fitness and wellness programs to transform your mind and body. download the audible app and start listening today. ♪ when your flight gets in late, it's never too early for coffee. oh no no no. your new boss seems cool, but she might not be sweatpants cool. who is that ready this early? it's only 7 am. somebody help me. close call. not quite ready to face the day? that's why we're here with free hot breakfast and a warm welcome. book at hampton.com for our price match guarantee. hampton by hilton.

tonight, the push to impeach, the billionaire tom steyer who flirteded with a presidential run and put $120 billion behind democrats in the midterms is taking on the person who would launch impeachment proceedings against president trump. hosting a town hall tonight to force jerry nadler, powerful chair of the house judiciary committee, to take action. tom steyer is "outfront." good to have you back, tom. i know, obviously, you've got your town hall tonight. why do you think this impeachment right now, this conversation, is still democrats' top priority, or should be their top priority? >> well, erin, i believe that we have a crisis in the united states. the crisis is the president of the united states. and that the constitution gives us one solution, which is to impeach him and remove him from office.

and until that happens, the country's at risk. people are going to be suffering and we'll not be doing the right thing. so i think it's the crisis and, therefore, we should deal with it directly. >> all right. so when you say it's the crisis, look, you're being very clear where you stand. so you're holding this event in the district of congressman jerry nadler. now, jerry nadler is very important, right? he's the chairman of the committee that would initiate the impeachment proceedings and he's been extremely careful, as you are probably painfully aware, to not jump on the impeachment train. here's his reason. >> you don't necessarily launch an impeachment against the president because he committed an impeachable offense. there are several things you have to look at. one, whether an impeachable offense is committed, how many, et cetera. secondly, how important were they? do they rise to the gravity where you should undertake an impeachment? >> he's saying to be impeachable, you need to have a crime, a crime of gravity. not everything would reach that level. it would happen during the presidency of president trump and if it isn't, there won't be the votes to impeach. why is he wrong?

>> say that again, erin? >> i said -- >> why is he wrong? >> why is jerry nadler wrong? >> well, i think what he's saying is true and actually we have a president who has committed impeachable offenses and they do rise to the level of impeachment, and if you simply look at the last week, you look at his fake state of emergency, you see a president who's willing to go directly against the constitution, to continrave congress' right to allocate the money in our society because he didn't get his way and he threw a fit. so, in fact, what we've seen is a president who's going at the most important issues that a president can do. the separation of powers that mr. nadler has actually specifically referenced, if a president goes after the separation of powers, that's an impeachable offense. >> yet, chairman nadler is not starting impeachment proceedings and showing no signs of doing so. he's seeming to be much more cautious. what are you going to do about it? >> well, what we're trying -- we

have 7.3 million people who've signed our petition. 26,000 of them are in congressman nadler's district. in fact, we polled his district and 96% of the democratic primary voters think this president is unfit for office. so we have -- what we're trying to say is this is a movement of americans across the whole country. >> yeah. >> very specifically in his district and they are demanding action from their congress and their congressman. >> so would you primary him? is that the -- that sounds like what you're saying, you're saying, look, 96% of your primary voters would support this, so if he doesn't do it, you could fund someone to challenge him in a primary? >> actually, what we're doing, erin, is something much earlier than that. we're making the point that, in fact, his constituents, the people who have put him in office, did so for a very specific purpose as they want action and they want this president held to account. and we're just evidencing that and trying to show that and that's why we're in his district

so that he can understand how much his constituents are asking him to do this and we believe he will do it. >> all right, thank you very much, tom. good to talk to you again. >> thanks, erin. >> tom steyer in his town hall, as i said, happening tonight. next, elizabeth warren's new 2020 strategy. >> so now we're going to get wonky for just a minute. plus jeanne on why the race for 2020 has already gone to the dogs. at fidelity, we make sure you have a clear plan to cover the essentials in retirement, as well as all the things you want to do. and on the way, you'll get timely investment help to keep you on the right track, without the unnecessary fees you might expect from so many financial firms. because when you have a partner who gives you clarity at every step, there's nothing to stop you from moving forward. who gives you clarity at every step, (door bell rings) it's ohey. this is amazing. with moderate to severe ulcerative colitis,

are you okay? even when i was there, i never knew when my symptoms would keep us apart. so i talked to my doctor about humira. i learned humira can help get, and keep uc under control when other medications haven't worked well enough. and it helps people achieve control that lasts. so you can experience few or no symptoms. humira can lower your ability to fight infections, including tuberculosis. serious, sometimes fatal infections and cancers, including lymphoma, have happened; as have blood, liver, and nervous system problems, serious allergic reactions, and new or worsening heart failure. before treatment, get tested for tb. tell your doctor if you've been to areas where certain fungal infections are common, and if you've had tb, hepatitis b, are prone to infections, or have flu-like symptoms or sores. don't start humira if you have an infection. be there for you, and them. ask your gastroenterologist about humira. with humira, control is possible. at&t provides edge-to-edge intelligence, covering virtually every part of your manufacturing business.

& so this won't happen. because you've made sure this sensor and this machine are integrated. & she can talk to him, & yes... atta, boy. some people assign genders to machines. and you can be sure you won't have any problems. except for the daily theft of your danish. not cool! at&t provides edge to edge intelligence. it can do so much for your business, the list goes on and on. that's the power of &. & this shipment will be delivered... every insurance company tells you they can save you money. save up to 10% when you bundle with esurance. including me, esurance spokesperson dennis quaid. he's a pretty good spokesperson. ehhh. so when i say, "drivers who switched from geico to esurance saved an average of $412," you probably won't believe me. hey, actor lady whose scene was cut. hi. but you can believe this esurance employee, nancy abraham. seriously, send her an email and ask her yourself. no emails... no emails. when insurance is affordable, it's surprisingly painless. (clapping) every day, visionaries are creating the future.

( ♪ ) so, every day, we put our latest technology and vast expertise to work. ( ♪ ) the united states postal service makes more e-commerce deliveries to homes than anyone else in the country, affordably and on-time. (ringing) ( ♪ ) the future only happens with people who really know how to deliver it.

new tonight, elizabeth warren with a new idea. this item, universal child care. is there any way for the numbers to add up? well, warren is counting on the careers of professor to give her cred. mj lee is outfront. >> i'm going to nerd out with you and say oh, man, it's a good bill. >> when massachusetts senator elizabeth warren hits the campaign, his style on full display. >> can i get an amen from an electrician on that? >> now we're going to get wonky for a minute. >> for those of you who leave and say i must be turning into a nerd. >> the former lawyer and bankruptcy expert regularly responding like this to

questions from voters on everything from net neutrality. to renewable energy policies. >> do you have any proposals we can move past this antiquated system of inaermg? >> so, you want me to wonk out for a minute here, right? you want me to get this crowd up on net metering. do i have any net metering wonks here. >> a less than a yerout, warren has unveiled a pair of major policies. first, she called for a wealth tax on americans with assets of $50 million or more. >> reforms that close loopholes and giveaways to the people at the top. and an ultra millionaires tax to make sure that rich people start doing their part for the country that made them rich. >> today, she released a sweeping universal child care plan, guaranteeing child care for all parents for the moment

trar children are born until they enter school. >> families are buckling under the weight of it. it holds people back. they decide they can't work because they're worried about the cost of child care. >> advisers and friends say warren's knack for the town hall style question and answer format traces back to her years in the classroom. she taught special needs children in the 1970s before eventually becoming a law professor, most recently at harfered law school. one former student, katie porter, says warren's approach in the classroom mirrors her style on the stump. >> the metric of elizabeth as a teacher is she's able to grasp really technical information, down in the details of bankruptcy how works and what subsection 2-b22 means and she's able to bring it back up to what is the real world impact this law is having. >> that view echoed by another former student, massachusetts congressman joe kennedy who endorsed warren at her official campaign announcement earlier this month.

>> her classes were known as the hardest classes at school. not necessarily because of the subject but because of the teacher. she had you drinking from a fire hose in that class. it was really something to be part of. >> she showcased those instincts during a visit to the university of puerto rico last month. >> anybody else worried about the rising tuition? >> in an increasingly crowded field featuring plenty of star power, warren is hoping her policy chops will set her apart. >> yes. >> you have already hit -- >> it's a nerd thing. >> now, warren says that her universal child care plan is going to be paid for by the revenue from her wealth tax and her advisers tell cnn she is going to have other proposals that are also going to be paid by the same revenue. erin, it goes to show how central this yietd is going to be to her entire platform. >> the tax. all right, thank very much. appreciate it. >> next, jeane on the canines upstaging the candidates.

♪ when cravings hit, hit back. choose glucerna, with slow release carbs to help manage blood sugar, and start making everyday progress. glucerna.

new made for all lip color from maybelline new york. tested on 50 skin tones. sensational on all. new made for all. only from maybelline new york.

♪ e*trade core portfolios is an easy, automated way to get invested. we'll save you time by building, monitoring and managing a portfolio for you and provide all hands-on deck support when you need it helping you become top dog. ♪

this is moving day with the best in-home wifi experience and millions of wifi hotspots to help you stay connected. and this is moving day with reliable service appointments in a two-hour window so you're up and running in no time. show me decorating shows. this is staying connected with xfinity to make moving... simple. easy. awesome. stay connected while you move with the best wifi experience and two-hour appointment windows. click, call or visit a store today. here's jeanne. >> there's something about a

candidate having a dog. that seems to scratch an itch whether you're a long shot candidate, pete budde ajudge with two shelter dogs or well known senator elizabeth warren. >> say hello, bailey. say hello. >> more than happy to talk baby talk to a golden retriever. >> that's our bailey. >> who she's been introducing along with her husband. >> i thought i would bring the two guys in my life, bruce and bailey. >> supporters can't keep their hands off. >> oh, hi. >> candidate and spouse stroll off holding hands and a leash. some candidates put their dogs in commercials. >> that's why we approve this message. >> and even campaign merchandise, but there are perils to promoting pets. when kerstin gillibrand posted her labradoodle, someone tweeted, if maple isn't a rescue, i take issue. someone else suggested a new

collar, trump take a walk. beto o'rourke has two dogs. among the dogless contenders, amy klobuchar, bernie sanders, and kamala harris, though she tries to make up for it by posting canine supporters. cory booker got put on a spot by a kid. >> did you ever have a dog? >> no dog, but booker made a quick save. >> if i should become president of the united states, would you help me get a dog? would you help me? >> president trump says he doesn't have time for a dog. >> how would i look walking a dog on the white house lawn? would that be -- feels a little phony. >> he prefers to call his opponents dogs, while would-be opponent joe biden posed recently with a shelter dog, major. that he adopted to keep his old german shepherd champ company. >> he's -- watch this. champ, you want to play golf. >> even president trump might like a dog that doubles as a

golf partner. >> where's the golf club. >> jeanne moos, cnn. >> go get the golf ball. >> new york. >> and thanks so much to all of you for joining us. see you back here tomorrow. ac 360 starts now. good evening. in a moment, the man who had to grapple first-hand with the question that no one in his position has never had reason to ever ask. could the president of the united states be acting as the agent of a hostile power? former acting fbi director andrew mccabe is here and that's just one stunning headline from the story he's telling. there's others, no less striking. we'll talk at length with him about all of it in minutes. first though, in depth reporting from "the new york times" touching on some of the same moments and themes that mr. mccabe does and robert mueller is believed to be focusing on. the entitle is intimidation, pressure, and